Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;9:e51889. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51889

Figure 4. Frequencies of CSP-specific memory B cell subsets are greater in the DFD regimen than in the STD regimen at later time points.

PBMC were cultured for 5 days in the presence of PF-CSP and PF-16 antigens and analyzed for frequencies of B cell maturation subsets: switched memory (SM: CD20+CD10CD27+IgDIgG+), switched activated memory (sAM: CD20+CD10CD21lowCD27+IgDIgG+) and Ki67 expression on total memory (Mem: CD20+CD10CD27+) B cells in DFD (n = 29) and STD (n = 14) regimens at T5, T6 and T7. (A–C) The scatter plots show PF-CSP-specific SM (A); sAM (B) and Ki67+(C) memory B cells. (D–F) PF-16-specific SM (D); sAM (E) and Ki67+(F) memory B cells. Data for the protected group are represented as dark blue open circles for DFD (P DFD, n = 25) and as light blue open circles for STD regimen (P STD, n = 10) and non-protected as red open circles (NP, n = 10) for both regimens. Statistical analysis was performed using the generalized linear mixed-effects model via Penalized Quasi-Likelihood to accommodate repeated measurements over time. Statistical significance is shown as: *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.

Figure 4—source data 1. PF-CSP-specific SM B cells: DFD vs STD (Figure 4A).
Figure 4—source data 2. PF16-specific SM B cells: DFD vs STD (Figure 4D).
Figure 4—source data 3. PF CSP switched activated memory B cells: DFD vs STD (Figure 4B).
Figure 4—source data 4. PF 16-specific switched activated memory B cells: DFD vs STD (Figure 4E).
Figure 4—source data 5. PF CSP-specific Ki67+ memory B cells: DFD vs STD (Figure 4C).
Figure 4—source data 6. PF 16-specific Ki67+ memory B cells: DFD vs STD (Figure 4F).

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Gating strategy for the B cell subsets.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Live (Aqua) cells were gated from the singlets followed by gating for the CD3CD20+B cells from live lymphocytes. Mature B cells were identified as CD10CD20+ B cells. From the mature B cells, total memory B cells were identified as CD20+CD27+ cells. On the basis of the expression of CD21, CD27 and IgD, B cell maturation subsets were identified as naïve (CD21hiCD27IgD+) B cells, resting memory (RM: CD21hiCD27+) activated memory B cells (AM: CD21lowCD27+) and atypical memory B cells (aMBC: CD21lowCD27). On the basis of the IgD and IgG expression, unswitch and switch memory B cells were identified as IgD+IgG (UM: unswitch) and IgDIgG+ (SM: switch). Switch memory B cells in total memory, RM and AM were designated as SM, sRM and sAM, respectively, while unswitch memory B cells were designated as UM, uRM, uAM for total memory, RM and AM, respectively. All B cell subsets were gated for the expression of the proliferation marker Ki67.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. CD80 expression on the total B cell, RM and AM subsets.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

CD80 expression was analyzed in ex vivo B cell subsets at all the timepoints by flow cytometry. Data were compared longitudinally and also between the P (green line; n = 35) and NP (red line; n = 10) groups at each timepoint. (A) Representative flow cytometry dot plot for CD80 staining of B cells. (B, D, F) Line graphs with error bars, indicating mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), for frequencies of CD80 expression on total (B), RM (D) and AM B cells (F). (C, E, G) Scatter plots comparing CD80 expression between the DFD and STD regimens at T5, T6 and T7 for total (C), RM (E) and AM (G) B cells. Data for the protected group are represented by dark blue open circles for DFD (P DFD) and by light blue open circles for the STD regimen (P STD), whereas data for the non-protected group are shown as red open circles (NP) for both regimens. Statistical analysis was performed using the generalized linear mixed-effects model via Penalized Quasi-Likelihood to accommodate repeated measurements over time. Differences between timepoints in P and NP and between P and NP at each timepoint are not statistically significant.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. CD80 expression on B cell subsets.
(B) CD80+ B cells (% of CD20+ B cells). (C) CD80+ B cells (% of CD20+ B cells). (D) CD80+ RM B cells (% of RM B cells). (E) CD80+ RM B cells (% of RM B cells). (F) CD80+ AM B cells (% of AM B cells). (G) CD80+ AM B cells (% of AM B cells).
Figure 4—figure supplement 3. Higher atypical memory B cells (aMBC) at T5 and T6 in the DFD group.

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

PBMC were cultured for 5 days in the presence of PF-CSP and PF-16 antigens, and atypical memory B cells (aMBC) were identified as CD3CD20+CD21lo/negCD10CD27 by flow cytometry. (A, B) Scatter plots showing aMBC specific to PF-CSP (A) and PF-16 (B). Data from the protected group are indicated as dark blue open circles for the DFD regimen (P DFD) and as light blue open circles for the STD regimen (P STD), whereas data from the non-protected group are represented as red open circles (NP) for both regimens. Statistical analysis was performed using the generalized linear mixed-effects model via Penalized Quasi-Likelihood package to accommodate repeated measurements over time. Statistical significance shown as: *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.
Figure 4—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Ki67+ aMBC specific to PF-CSP and PF-16.
(A) PF-CSP-specific Ki67+ aMBC (% of aMBC). (B) PF-16 specific Ki67+ aMBC (% of aMBC).
Figure 4—figure supplement 4. CSP-specific memory B cell subsets in P and NP subjects.

Figure 4—figure supplement 4.

PBMC were cultured for 5 days in the presence of PF-CSP and PF-16 antigens, and B cell maturation subsets and Ki67 expression on B cell subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. Line graphs with error bars indicate mean cell frequencies ± standard errors of the mean (SEM) for B cell subsets in the P (green; n = 35) and NP (red, n = 10) subjects for (A) SM, (B) sAM and (C) Ki67+ mem B cells. (D–F) Frequencies of PF-16-specific (D) SM, (E) sAM and (F) Ki67mem B cells. Statistical analysis was performed using the generalized linear mixed-effects model via Penalized Quasi-Likelihood to accommodate repeated measurements over time. Statistical significance is shown as: *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.
Figure 4—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Mean frequencies of mory B cell subsets between P and NP subjects.
(A) Frequencies of PF-CSP-specific SM B cells (% of memory B cells). (B) Frequencies of PF-CSP-specific sAM B cells (% of AM B cells). (C) Frequencies of PF-CSP-specific Ki67+ memory B cells (% of memory B cells). (D) Frequencies of PF-16-specific SM B cells (% of memory B cells). (E) Frequencies of PF-16-specific sAM B cells (% of AM B cells). (F) Frequencies of PF-16-specific Ki67+ memory B cells (% of memory B cells).