Abstract
Background/Aims
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second-most common primary liver malignancy, arising from the peripheral intrahepatic bile duct epithelium. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) may be involved in the development of ICC. We explored the prognostic value of hepatitis virus infection, as well as other prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with ICC.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with ICC between August 2005 and December 2018 at Konkuk University Medical Center. We identified a total of 131 patients with ICC. Overall survival rates of patients with and without hepatitis were determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to estimate factors influencing survival outcomes.
Results
A total of 17.6% (23/131) of patients were positive for HBV or HCV. Hepatitis B positive ICC patients were significantly younger with higher albumin and higher α-fetoprotein than those without hepatitis viral infections. The median survival of hepatitis-positive and hepatitis-negative groups was 280 and 213 days, respectively. Survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.279). Multivariate analyses indicated that lower serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) (p < 0.001), lower T stage (p = 0.042), the absence of lymph-node metastasis (p = 0.043), and receiving curative surgery (p = 0.033) were independent predictors of better outcomes.
Conclusions
While hepatitis influenced a number of clinical features in ICC patients, it did not affect survival rate. Prognostic factors influencing survival outcomes with ICC were CA 19-9 level, T stage, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and curative surgery.
Keywords: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, Survival rate
INTRODUCTION
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the second-most common primary hepatic tumor (after hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), accounts for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors and 10% to 15% of primary liver malignancies [1,2]. The incidence and mortality rates of ICC have been increasing globally in recent decades. ICC is a lethal malignancy, with a median survival of 6.5 months from the time of diagnosis in untreated patients [3]. However, the etiology of cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear. The primary risk factor for ICC is primary sclerosing cholangitis. Obesity, inflammatory conditions of the biliary tract, ulcerative colitis, smoking, Caroli’s disease, exposure to radiopaque medium thorium dioxide (Thorotrast, Testagar & Co. Inc., Detroit, MI, USA), and diabetes have also been proposed as risk factors [1,3]. Hepatitis viruses, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), are causative agents of HCC. Recent studies have shown that both HBV and HCV infections can cause ICC [4,5], which may explain its increasing incidence. Regardless of etiology, surgical resection offers the only prospect of cure; however, only a small percentage of patients with ICC have resectable cancer at the time of diagnosis.
Given the increasing incidence of ICC, its poor prognosis, and the lack of adequate treatment options, further studies exploring its risk factors, prognostic indicators, and outcomes are required. While several recent studies have indicated that HBV and HCV infections have prognostic significance for ICC [6,7], the prognostic impact of such infections remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study of all patients with ICC treated between 2005 and 2018 at a single institution to evaluate the prognostic value of hepatitis virus infection status and to identify other prognostic factors that affect survival in patients with ICC.
METHODS
Patients
A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with ICC between August 2005 and December 2018 at Konkuk University Medical Center. All patients with an intrahepatic mass were evaluated for operability by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ultrasound-guided biopsies were performed to confirm the pathologic diagnosis when patients were assessed with unresectable ICC by radiologic examination. Patients with HCC-cholangiocarcinoma mixed type, intraductal papillary biliary neoplasm, periductal infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma, or intraductal growing type were excluded. Only the mass-forming type was included. Patients with extrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, or sarcoma were excluded. Serologic tests were performed for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HCV, indicators of liver function, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and α-fetoprotein (AFP) level. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of ICC was performed according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems. Surgical procedures were divided into major and minor resections. Major resection included hemihepatectomy and central bisectionectomy, while minor resection included sectionectomy and segmentectomy. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Konkuk University Medical Center (KUH 1010778). Written informed consent by the patients was waived due to a retrospective nature of our study.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Survival of patients in the study group was measured from the time of diagnosis. The study groups were compared using the chisquare test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test for continuous variables. Overall survival with HBV infection status was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were used to assess differences. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazards model, with the backward Wald procedure.
RESULTS
Of the 635 patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma during the study period, 131 patients had ICC (Fig. 1). Table 1 describes the clinical features of the patients in the study group. It included 74 males and 57 females, with a mean age of 66.6 ± 11.7 years. Among these, a total of 17.6% (23/131) were positive for either HBsAg (19/23) or anti-HCV (4/23). The distribution among the seven different AJCC stages was as follows: I (14.5%), II (9.9%), III (2.3%), IVa (34.4%), and IVb (38.9%). Of the 131 patients, 37 underwent curative surgery (29.1%). In 16 patients (12.7%), surgery was followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The median overall survival of patients with ICC was 213 days.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of selection and disposition of patients. KUMC, Konkuk University Medical Center; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the study group
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Total patients | 131 |
| Age, yr | 66.6 ± 11.7 |
| Sex | |
| Men | 74 (56.5) |
| Female | 57 (43.5) |
| Hepatitis | |
| HBV | 19 (14.5) |
| HCV | 4 (3.1) |
| TNM stage | |
| I | 19 (14.5) |
| II | 13 (9.9) |
| III | 3 (2.3) |
| Iva | 45 (34.4) |
| IVb | 51 (38.9) |
| Curative surgery | 37 (29.1) |
| Chemotherapy | |
| Adjuvant | 16 (12.7) |
| Palliative | 62 (49.2) |
| Survival, day | 213 (104.0–440.0) |
Values are presented as mean ± SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).
HBV, hepatitis virus B; HCV, hepatitis virus C; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
The clinical features of hepatitis-B-associated ICC are listed in Table 2. Hepatitis B-associated ICC patients were significantly younger (6.75 [interquartile range, IQR, 60.5 to 76] vs. 57 [IQR, 52.0 to 64.0], p = 0.002) with higher albumin (3.6 [IQR, 3.3 to 4.0] vs. 3.9 [IQR, 3.4 to 4.3], p = 0.044) and higher AFP (3.0 [IQR, 2.5 to 5.0] vs. 7.0 [IQR, 3.0 to 190.8], p = 0.016) than those without hepatitis. There were no significant differences in other clinical indices, including bilirubin level, CA 19-9 level, or TNM stage. Hepatitis-C-associated ICC patients were not significantly different in clinical indices.
Table 2.
Clinical features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with hepatitis B virus infection and without hepatitis virus infection
| Variable | Without hepatitis | With hepatitis B | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total patients | 108 (82.4) | 19 (14.5) | |
| Mean age, yr | 67.5 (60.5–76.0) | 57.0 (52.0–64.0) | 0.002 |
| Sex | |||
| Men | 61 | 10 | NS |
| Women | 47 | 9 | |
| Bilirubin, mg/dL | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | NS |
| Albumin, mg/dL | 3.6 (3.3–4.0) | 3.9 (3.4–4.3) | 0.044 |
| CA 19-9, mg/dL | 81.1 (16.5–877.6) | 149.3 (19.5–756.3) | NS |
| AFP, mg/dL | 3.0 (2.5–5.0) | 7.0 (3.0–190.8) | 0.016 |
| CTP score | 5 (5–6) | 5 (5–5) | NS |
| TNM stage | NS | ||
| I | 15 (13.9) | 4 (21.1) | |
| II | 10 (9.3) | 2 (10.5) | |
| III | 3 (2.8) | 0 | |
| IV a | 37 (34.3) | 6 (31.6) | |
| IV b | 43 (39.8) | 7 (36.8) | |
| Mean survival, day | 213 (105–435) | 302 (96–686) | NS |
| HBV viral load, IU/mL | 231 (20–409) | ||
| Antiviral treatment | |||
| Yes | 8 (42.1) | ||
| No | 11 (57.9) |
Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).
NS, no statistically significant; CA 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; AFP, α-fetoprotein; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; HBV, hepatitis B virus.
Overall survival rates of ICC patients with and without hepatitis were not significantly different (p = 0.279). In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival with HBV infection status (p = 0.164) (Fig. 2). Table 3 describes the prognostic factors for survival identified in the study group. In univariate analyses, factors associated with survival included age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.005), albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL (p = 0.025), CA 19-9 ≥ 100 ng/mL (p < 0.001), T stage (T1–T3) at diagnosis (p < 0.001), presence of lymph node invasion (p < 0.001), presence of metastases at diagnosis (p < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery (p = 0.004) and curative surgery (p < 0.001). The median survival of ICC patients with and without hepatitis was 280 and 213 days, respectively. Survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.279). In addition, the median survivals of patients with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and without hepatitis were 302, 128.5, and 213 days, respectively. Survival rates did not differ significantly among the three groups (p = 0.166 vs. p = 0.603). In multivariate analyses, CA 19-9 < 100 ng/mL (p < 0.001), T stage (T1–T3) at diagnosis (p = 0.042), the absence of lymph node invasion (p = 0.043), and curative surgery (p = 0.033) were significant and independent predictors of a more favorable outcome.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection status. There are no significant differences in overall survival between the groups with and without HBV infection (p = 0.164).
Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with the survival of all patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
| Variable | Number | Median survival | Univariate analysis p value | Multivariate analysis |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p value | ||||
| Age, yr | |||||
| < 65 | 55 | 302 | |||
| ≥ 65 | 66 | 183.5 | 0.005 | 1.415 (0.856–2.339) | 0.176 |
| Hepatitis | |||||
| No | 98 | 213 | |||
| Hepatitis B | 19 | 302 | 0.166 | ||
| Hepatitis C | 4 | 128.5 | 0.603 | ||
| Hepatitis B or C | |||||
| No | 98 | 213 | |||
| Yes | 23 | 280 | 0.279 | ||
| CTP score | |||||
| < 7 | 100 | 216.5 | |||
| ≥ 7 | 21 | 139 | 0.570 | ||
| Albumin, g/dL | |||||
| < 3.5 | 40 | 119.5 | |||
| ≥ 3.5 | 81 | 268 | 0.025 | 0.875 (0.522–1.467) | 0.612 |
| Bilirubin, mg/dL | |||||
| < 3.0 | 111 | 217 | |||
| ≥ 3.0 | 10 | 71 | 0.209 | ||
| CA 19–9, ng/mL | |||||
| < 100 | 60 | 291 | |||
| ≥ 100 | 55 | 180 | < 0.001 | 2.378 (1.499–3.773) | < 0.001 |
| T stage | |||||
| T1–T3 | 77 | 338 | |||
| T4 | 44 | 124 | < 0.001 | 1.811 (1.022–3.210) | 0.042 |
| Lymph node | |||||
| Negative | 45 | 386 | |||
| Positive | 76 | 159 | < 0.001 | 1.756 (1.018–3.027) | 0.043 |
| Distant metastasis | |||||
| No | 76 | 291 | |||
| Yes | 45 | 122 | < 0.001 | 1.219 (0.729–2.038) | 0.449 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | |||||
| Yes | 15 | 612 | 0.004 | 0.615 (0.230–1.642) | 0.322 |
| No | 105 | 194 | |||
| Palliative chemotherapy | |||||
| Yes | 60 | 248.5 | 0.713 | ||
| No | 60 | 194.5 | |||
| Curative surgery | |||||
| Yes | 36 | 538 | < 0.001 | 0.426 (0.194–0.934) | 0.033 |
| No | 84 | 144.5 | |||
| Tumor size, cm | |||||
| < 5 | 20 | 538 | |||
| ≥ 5 | 12 | 561.5 | 0.518 | ||
| Surgical procedure | |||||
| Major resection | 16 | 406 | 0.282 | ||
| Minor resection | 16 | 612 | |||
| Resection margin | |||||
| Negative | 26 | 406 | |||
| Positive | 7 | 612 | 0.959 | ||
| Tumor differentiation | |||||
| Well or moderate | 22 | 579.6 | |||
| Poor or un-differentiation | 10 | 1242.3 | 0.252 | ||
| Perineural invasion | |||||
| Yes | 4 | 962 | 0.726 | ||
| No | 29 | 518 | |||
| Portal vein invasion | |||||
| Yes | 5 | 280 | 0.379 | ||
| No | 27 | 612 | |||
| Microvascular invasion | |||||
| Yes | 13 | 377 | 0.150 | ||
| No | 19 | 588 | |||
| Histologic cirrhosis | |||||
| Yes | 4 | 744.5 | 0.687 | ||
| No | 29 | 518 | |||
Median survival is expressed in days.
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; CA 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9.
DISCUSSION
The incidence of ICC is increasing, generating clinical interest in improving outcomes and identifying prognostic factors. Recently, many studies have indicated that HBV and HCV infection are statistically associated with ICC [4,5,8]. HBV and HCV infection are endemic in Korea. In our study, 17.6% of patients with ICC (23/131) were positive for HBV or HCV infection. Although we explored the prognostic value of hepatitis virus infection, we found no significant difference in overall survival between ICC patients with and without hepatitis, although some clinical features did differ between the two groups.
Cholangiocarcinoma is more common in older patients [9]. ICC typically presents sporadically as a discrete intrahepatic mass in patients over 65 years of age [10]. In our study, the mean age of patients at the time of ICC diagnosis was 66.6 years; in patients with underlying HBV infection, ICC diagnosis occurred at an earlier age, with a mean age at presentation of 57.0 years (p = 0.002) (Table 2). Although these patients were diagnosed at an earlier age, most had metastatic disease or unresectable tumors at the time of diagnosis. This may be due to specific mechanisms induced by hepatitis virus infection, but this remains unclear. In several recent studies, HBV nucleic acid and HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) have been identified in cholangiocarcinoma cells. These findings indicate that hepatitis viruses may induce cholangiocyte proliferation and dysplasia that leads to ICC development [11-14]. AFP is the most common marker for fetal hepatoblasts, hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs), or HCC. This study found that serum AFP levels > 20 ng/mL were present in about 30.4% of hepatitis-positive ICC patients [15]. HBV and HCV cause viral hepatitis and may cause cancer by inducing chronic inflammation in both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, leading to high levels of serum AFP. Recently, two clinical studies implied that both hepatitis-associated ICC and HCC share a common carcinogenesis process and that both arise from HPC [11,15]. In this study, the incidence of AFP > 20 ng/mL was much higher in hepatitis-associated ICC than in ICC patients without hepatitis (30.4% vs. 9.3%). These findings may imply that, during the process of malignant transformation, HPCs retain their ability to produce AFP.
Based on gross morphological features, ICC can be classified into three subtypes: mass-forming, periductal-infiltrating, and intraductal. Etiologies involving distinct molecular pathways may be associated with ICC subtypes. For example, ICC associated with hepatolithiasis and Clonorchis sinensis infection nearly always has an intraductal growth pattern [16]. In our study, although six patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria, we found that hepatitis-associated ICC tended to be of the mass-forming type (23/29). As noted above, it has been suggested that hepatitis-associated ICC and HCC share a common disease mechanism.
In our study, approximately 75% of patients had TNM stage III or IV and unresectable tumors at the time of diagnosis. Better survival was observed in patients with CA 19-9 < 100 ng/mL, with T stage 1 to 3 at diagnosis, and without lymph node invasion. In addition, curative surgery was better for survival if curative surgical resection was possible. Tumor size, tumor differentiation, anatomical resection, perineural invasion, presence of vascular invasion, and cirrhosis, which have been reported to be associated with prognosis in previous studies, were not statistically significant in our study [17-22].
In conclusion, ICC is associated with a poor prognosis; therefore, an improved understanding of the factors that determine patient outcomes is required. In many recent studies, HBV and HCV are possible risk factors for ICC development. In this study, we did not find a prognostic value for hepatitis virus status in ICC patients; however, patients with hepatitis-associated ICC showed several clinical features that differed from those in patients without hepatitis. The limitations of this study include its small sample size and retrospective nature. Therefore, a larger prospective study is needed to clarify the prognostic role of HBV and HCV infection for ICC.
KEY MESSAGE
1. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) may be involved in the development of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
2. While hepatitis influenced a number of clinical features in ICC patients, it did not affect survival rate.
3. Prognostic factors inf luencing survival outcomes with ICC were carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, T stage, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and curative surgery.
Acknowledgments
We would like to show our greatest appreciation to all professors of the Konkuk University Medical Center, who provided helpful comments and suggestions.
Footnotes
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
REFERENCES
- 1.Zhang H, Yang T, Wu M, Shen F. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and surgical management. Cancer Lett. 2016;379:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lafaro KJ, Cosgrove D, Geschwind JF, Kamel I, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Multidisciplinary care of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: updates in management. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:860861. doi: 10.1155/2015/860861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bergquist A, von Seth E. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29:221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Li B, et al. Hepatitis viruses infection and risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: evidence from a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matsumoto K, Onoyama T, Kawata S, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infection is a risk factor for the development of cholangiocarcinoma. Intern Med. 2014;53:651–654. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Z, Sheng YY, Dong QZ, Qin LX. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus play different prognostic roles in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3038–3051. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou HB, Hu JY, Hu HP. Hepatitis B virus infection and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5721–5729. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i19.5721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee TY, Lee SS, Jung SW, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Korea: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1716–1720. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01796.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shimada M. Highlights of topic “Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: recent advancements in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment”. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:91–93. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dhanasekaran R, Hemming AW, Zendejas I, et al. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2013;29:1259–1267. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee CH, Chang CJ, Lin YJ, Yeh CN, Chen MF, Hsieh SY. Viral hepatitis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma shares common disease processes with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1765–1770. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Perumal V, Wang J, Thuluvath P, Choti M, Torbenson M. Hepatitis C and hepatitis B nucleic acids are present in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas from the United States. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1211–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen RF, Li ZH, Zou SQ, Chen JS. Effect of hepatitis C virus core protein on modulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005;4:71–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Torbenson M, Yeh MM, Abraham SC. Bile duct dysplasia in the setting of chronic hepatitis C and alcohol cirrhosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1410–1413. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318053d122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou H, Wang H, Zhou D, et al. Hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma may hold common disease process for carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1056–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu ZF, Yang N, Li DY, Zhang HB, Yang GS. Characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatitis B virus infection: clinicopathologic study of resected tumours. J Viral Hepat. 2013;20:306–310. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hanazaki K, Kajikawa S, Shimozawa N, et al. Prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic resection: univariate and multivariate analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:311–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kawarada Y, Yamagiwa K, Das BC. Analysis of the relationships between clinicopathologic factors and survival time in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2002;183:679–685. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00853-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Song GW, Lee SG, Lee YJ, et al. Analysis of survival and factors affecting the survival after surgical resection of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: 318 cases in single institute. Korean J Hepatol. 2007;13:208–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Endo I, Gonen M, Yopp AC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248:84–96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176c4d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shirai K, Ebata T, Oda K, et al. Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32:2395–2402. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9726-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yuan L, Luo X, Lu X, et al. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a largescale retrospective study. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7:615–622. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]