Abstract
A diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) approach has been used to functionalize 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids through a one-pot procedure involving a ring-closing enyne metathesis (RCEYM) and a Diels–Alder reaction on the resulting diene, under microwave irradiations. Taking advantage of the propargyl alcohol moiety present on commercially available steroids, this classical strategy was applied to mestranol and lynestrenol, giving a collection of new complex 17-spirosteroids.
Keywords: diversity-oriented strategy, 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids, ring-closing enyne metathesis, spirosteroids, steroids
Introduction
Diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) is a powerful approach to access collections of structurally diverse compounds in a few synthetic steps [1–7]. It can be more relevant when the chemical diversity is centred on biologically validated scaffolds [8–10], referred to as privileged structures in medicinal chemistry [11–14]. Spanning unexplored chemical space, DOS strategies have been successfully applied to the generation of biologically active libraries for screening, leading to the discovery of medicinally relevant compounds [15–17].
Once a biologically relevant scaffold has been identified, the diversity-generating workflow can basically follow two complementary approaches, either by de novo synthesis sequentially incorporating the diversity [15,18–19], or by late functionalization of easily accessible biologically relevant materials. This second strategy can take benefit of existing functional groups on the substrate, or rely on direct C–H functionalization [20–33]. Taking steroids as an example of highly targeted privileged structures, numerous diversity-oriented approaches were developed, generating diversity either at the construction stage (Scheme 1a) [34–35], or by transformation of the main steroidal core (Scheme 1b) [36–39].
Scheme 1.
Two diversity-oriented strategies: (a) Diversity installed during the construction of the skeleton; (b) Diversity installed lately by functionalization.
An important class of steroid medicines, also bearing a crucial propargylic alcohol function for our targeted strategy, lies on the 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids (Figure 1). They are commonly used as contraceptive while their skeleton is structurally diversified, especially at ring A. They are thus synthetically relevant as starting materials in a DOS approach. Indeed, after installing an alkenyl ether on the propargylic alcohol, the resulting enyne is a good substrate for ring closing enyne metathesis (RCEYM) towards new diene substrates [40–42], which can be employed in Diels–Alder reactions with a variety of dienophiles (Figure 1) [43–54]. This strategy has been previously used to generate medicinally relevant diversity in other compound series [49,55–58]. However, it has surprisingly never been applied to 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids.
Figure 1.
Structure of four 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids 1–4 (top) and how they could be used to generate diversity (down).
Most steroids bind cytosolic receptors that are then taken up into the nucleus to modulate gene transcription, or directly bind nuclear receptors [59–61]. In principle, steroids could thus be used as cargo molecules to deliver new chemical entities inside the nucleus, highlighting the potential of hybrid steroid molecules [62]. For example, De Riccardis designed steroid scaffolds directly fused to a cytotoxic anthraquinone moiety and obtained positive, yet limited, cytotoxic activities [63–64]. Furthermore, a steroidal anti-estrogen–doxorubicin conjugate was synthesized by Hanson, showing a 70-fold increase of activity compared to doxorubicin in inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting cell death [65]. Today, the research on steroids is still extremely active thanks to their huge medicinal potential [66–67].
In this context and owing to the commercial availability of 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids, we decided to apply a DOS approach to the synthesis of steroid analogues based on mestranol (1) and lynestrenol (2). By using the sequence of RCEYM/Diels–Alder reaction, we rapidly synthesized "17-spirosteroid" compounds, orthogonally linking a non-steroidal polycyclic moiety to the steroid part at position 17. Spirocyclic systems play an important role in current medicinal chemistry thanks to their characteristic 3D geometry [68]. In particular, with 17-spirosteroids [69–76], the three dimensional complexity of the steroid CD-ring system is expected to be substantially affected.
Results and Discussion
The first goal of this work aimed at synthesizing spirocyclic derivatives of several steroidal skeletons, starting from available 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroid compounds 1–3 (Scheme 2). Alkylation of the alcohol function proceeded well under classical conditions (NaH then RCH2Br in DMF), either in the presence of allyl bromide or of 4-pentenyl bromide. Mestranol (1), lynestrenol (2) and desogestrel (3) gave alkylated products 5–7 in good yields and were readily engaged in the RCEYM reaction.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of spirocyclic steroid derivatives by the RCEYM reaction. Conditions: (a) NaH (2 equiv), allyl or 4-pentenyl bromide (2 equiv), DMF, 0 °C→rt; (b) Second-generation Grubbs catalyst (G-II), toluene, under microwave at 120 °C (5a, 6a, 7) or 170 °C (5b, 6b).
The RCEYM reaction was then undertaken post alkylation. In fact, these quaternary propargyl ethers are particularly hindered. For such hindered substrates, we previously employed the Stewart–Grubbs catalyst combined with microwave heating at 120 °C (allyl ethers) or 170 °C (4-pentenyl ethers), demonstrating improved yields [77]. These temperatures were needed for the reaction to quickly go to completion. With 17-O-allylmestranol (5a), a rapid screening of the Stewart–Grubbs (SG), second-generation Grubbs (G-II) and second generation Hoveyda–Grubbs catalysts (HG-II) (Figure 2) showed that all catalysts are efficient at performing the RCEYM transformation into 8a, with the best performance by SG (93%). However, the less costly catalyst G-II worked well and was retained for the next study (Scheme 2). Thus, in the presence of G-II in toluene and under microwave heating, the reaction provided 17-spirosteroid dienes 8–10 in good yields (67–82%).
Figure 2.
Structure of metathesis catalysts.
Spirocyclic vinylcyclopentene substrates 8a,b and 9a,b were engaged in Diels–Alder reactions with a variety of dienophiles (11–15). The reaction proved efficient when adding the dienophile and heating in the same pot just after the RCEYM (Scheme 3). From mestranol derivative 5a, endo cycloadducts 16a–e were obtained in good to excellent yields. However, the reaction with maleic anhydride (12) gave a poor yield attributed to the reactivity of the obtained succinic anhydride derivative (16b) upon purification. Other unsymmetrical dienophiles (methyl acrylate, methyl propiolate) gave complex mixtures of regio- and/or stereoisomers. The reaction of lynestrenol enyne 6a with N-phenylmaleimide was also performed to furnish compound 17a in 84% yield.
Scheme 3.
One-pot RCEYM/Diels–Alder reaction strategy applied to the mestranol and lynestrenol cores. Notes: aIsolated among other unseparable stereoisomers (overall cycloadduct yields: 65% and 50%, for the respective reactions).
Concerning the use of oxepane-type dienes 8b and 9b, none of the attempted Diels–Alder reactions proved efficient, systematically leading to a mixture of diastereoisomers and difficult purifications. Only cycloadducts 16f and 17b could be isolated in minute amounts (Scheme 3).
Finally, the structure and stereochemistry of the products were determined by 2D NMR analysis. Taking 16b as an example, the key NOESY correlations between proton H-4' at 2.79 ppm and steroid protons H-12 at 1.33/1.65 ppm demonstrated that H-4' is on the α-face of the cyclohexene (Figure 3a). The endo character of the Diels–Alder cycloadducts was demonstrated thanks to NOESY correlations observed between protons H-4', H-7'α at 2.30 ppm, H-8' at 3.46 ppm, and H-9' at 3.54 ppm, all on the same cyclohexene α-face. Overall, the facial selectivity of this Diels–Alder reaction seems controlled by the steric hindrance imposed by the steroid skeleton on the dienyl tetrahydrofuran α-face, imposing orbital interactions with the dienophile from the β-face (Figure 3b). All these structures have an extended skeleton, with the steroid part being perpendicular to the cycloadduct moiety thanks to the spiro junction.
Figure 3.
Rationale for the observed stereochemistry: (a) NOESY correlations observed on compound 16b, showing key correlations between protons of the cyclohexene α-face and both protons H-12 (the dotted line indicates a weak correlation); (b) Model to explain the diene–dienophile interaction during the Diels–Alder reaction.
Conclusion
A one-pot RCEYM/Diels–Alder reaction sequence was used to generate a new type of structural diversity in steroids, taking benefit of the propargylic alcohol group of 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids. After an alkenylation of the alcohol present on the commercially available steroids, providing with enyne substrates, the one-pot reaction manifold enabled the anchorage of non-steroidal spirocyclic moieties at C-17. The procedure proved efficient and stereoselective with mestranol and lynestrenol derivatives incorporating a 2-tetrahydrofuranyl spirocycle at C-17. It was more difficult with 2-oxepanyl structures due to the poor diastereoselectivity of the Diels–Alder reaction in this case. Finally, we expect to apply this strategy to complementary reactions like the Pauson–Khand reaction that may be useful to cyclize enyne substrates like 5–7 and expand the spirosteroid diversity. All compounds will be engaged in biological screening campaign in the near future.
Experimental
General procedure A for alkylation of 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids
To a suspension of 17-ethynyl-17-hydroxysteroids (1 mmol) in dry DMF (10 mL), NaH (2 mmol, used as a 60% stabilized mixture in oil) was added at 0 °C. After stirring for 1.5 hours, the alkyl bromide (2 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 hours. The reaction was quenched by the addition of water (10 mL). The solution was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 20 mL), the combined organic layers were then washed with water (20 mL), brine (20 mL), and dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by chromatography on silica gel, using a 98:2 petroleum ether/EtOAc eluent, to afford the alkylated compound.
General procedure B for ring closing enyne metathesis
The enyne substrate (1 mmol) was dissolved in dry toluene (c 0.03 M). The solution was placed in a sealed microwave tube containing a magnetic stirrer under argon. The Grubbs second generation catalyst (2 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 17-allyloxysteroids, or at 170 °C for 17-(4-penten-1-yloxy)steroids, for 1 h under microwave irradiation. The solvent was removed by evaporation, and the resulting crude material was purified by chromatography on silica gel (petroleum ether/EtOAc 99:1) to afford the spirocyclic diene.
General procedure C for one-pot RCEYM/Diels–Alder reaction
The enyne (1 mmol) was dissolved in dry toluene (c 0.03 M). The solution was placed in a sealed microwave tube containing a magnetic stirrer under argon. The Grubbs second generation catalyst (2 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 1 h under microwave irradiation. The microwave tube was opened and the dienophile (1.2 mmol) was added in one portion. The mixture was stirred at 150 °C for 35 min. The solvent was removed and the crude material was purified by chromatography on silica gel (petroleum ether/EtOAc 8:3) to afford the product.
Supporting Information
General experimental details, compound descriptions, 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Alain Blond and Alexandre Deville are gratefully acknowledged for NMR spectra, and Dr. Sophie Bourcier for HRMS spectra.
Funding Statement
We thank the CNRS "Fondation pour le développement de la Chimie des Substances Naturelles et ses Applications" for granting a PhD fellowship to BL from 2013 to 2016, and SATT Lutech for funding the internship of MLS in 2017
References
- 1.Schreiber S L. Science. 2000;287:1964–1969. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burke M D, Schreiber S L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:46–58. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tan D S. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:74–84. doi: 10.1038/nchembio0705-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kaiser M, Wetzel S, Kumar K, Waldmann H. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:1186–1201. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7492-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kumar K, Waldmann H. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:3224–3242. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Galloway W R J D, Isidro-Llobet A, Spring D R. Nat Commun. 2010;1(1):80. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.O' Connor C J, Beckmann H S G, Spring D R. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(12):4444–4456. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35023h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Breinbauer R, Vetter I R, Waldmann H. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:2878–2890. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020816)41:16<2878::aid-anie2878>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wetzel S, Bon R S, Kumar K, Waldmann H. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:10800–10826. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bon R S, Waldmann H. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43(8):1103–1114. doi: 10.1021/ar100014h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Evans B E, Rittle K E, Bock M G, DiPardo R M, Freidinger R M, Whitter W L, Lundell G F, Veber D F, Anderson P S, Chang R S L, et al. J Med Chem. 1988;31(12):2235–2246. doi: 10.1021/jm00120a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.DeSimone R W, Currie K S, Mitchell S A, Darrow J W, Pippin D A. Comb Chem High Throughput Screening. 2004;7:473–493. doi: 10.2174/1386207043328544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Welsch M E, Snyder S A, Stockwell B R. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010;14:347–361. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim J, Kim H, Park S B. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:14629–14638. doi: 10.1021/ja508343a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pelish H E, Westwood N J, Feng Y, Kirchhausen T, Shair M D. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:6740–6741. doi: 10.1021/ja016093h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Švenda J, Sheremet M, Kremer L, Maier L, Bauer J O, Strohmann C, Ziegler S, Kumar K, Waldmann H. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2015;54(19):5596–5602. doi: 10.1002/anie.201500112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pavlinov I, Gerlach E M, Aldrich L N. Org Biomol Chem. 2019;17(7):1608–1623. doi: 10.1039/c8ob02327a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nielsen T E, Schreiber S L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:48–56. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garcia-Castro M, Zimmermann S, Sankar M G, Kumar K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55:7586–7605. doi: 10.1002/anie.201508818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huigens R W, III, Morrison K C, Hicklin R W, Flood T A, Jr, Richter M F, Hergenrother P J. Nat Chem. 2013;5:195–202. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rafferty R J, Hicklin R W, Maloof K A, Hergenrother P J. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:220–224. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang J, Wu J, Hong B, Ai W, Wang X, Li H, Lei X. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4614. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen Q-F, Wang F-P, Liu X-Y. Chem – Eur J. 2015;21:8946–8950. doi: 10.1002/chem.201500839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tejedor D, Delgado-Hernández S, Carballo R M, Dapueto R, Mena-Rejón G J, García-Tellado F. J Org Chem. 2017;82(10):5328–5336. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tang H, Chen Q-F, Liu X-Y, Zhang H, Chen D-L, Wang F-P. Tetrahedron. 2016;72:1357–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.01.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morrison K C, Hergenrother P J. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:6–14. doi: 10.1039/c3np70063a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Robles O, Romo D. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:318–334. doi: 10.1039/c3np70087a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Balthaser B R, Maloney M C, Beeler A B, Porco J A, Jr, Snyder J K. Nat Chem. 2011;3:969–973. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li J, Cisar J S, Zhou C-Y, Vera B, Williams H, Rodríguez A D, Cravatt B F, Romo D. Nat Chem. 2013;5:510–517. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hutt O E, Doan T L, Georg G I. Org Lett. 2013;15:1602–1605. doi: 10.1021/ol400385w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ding C, Zhang Y, Chen H, Wild C, Wang T, White M A, Shen Q, Zhou J. Org Lett. 2013;15:3718–3721. doi: 10.1021/ol4015865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grenning A J, Snyder J K, Porco J A., Jr Org Lett. 2014;16:792–795. doi: 10.1021/ol4035269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Michaudel Q, Journot G, Regueiro-Ren A, Goswami A, Guo Z, Tully T P, Zou L, Ramabhadran R O, Houk K N, Baran P S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;53:12091–12096. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sünnemann H W, Hofmeister A, Magull J, Banwell M G, de Meijere A. Org Lett. 2007;9(3):517–520. doi: 10.1021/ol062878m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sünnemann H W, Banwell M G, de Meijere A. Chem – Eur J. 2008;14:7236–7249. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wessjohann L A, Voigt B, Rivera D G. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44:4785–4790. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Charaschanya M, Aubé J. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):934. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03248-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pérez-Labrada K, Méndez Y, Brouard I, Rivera D G. ACS Comb Sci. 2013;15:320–330. doi: 10.1021/co400028e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao C, Ye Z, Ma Z-x, Wildman S A, Blaszczyk S A, Hu L, Guizei I A, Tang W. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11976-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Spandl R J, Rudyk H, Spring D R. Chem Commun. 2008:3001–3003. doi: 10.1039/b807278g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pizzirani D, Kaya T, Clemons P A, Schreiber S L. Org Lett. 2010;12:2822–2825. doi: 10.1021/ol100914b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kandimalla S R, Sabitha G. Adv Synth Catal. 2017;359(19):3444–3453. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201700511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schürer S C, Blechert S. Chem Commun. 1999:1203–1204. doi: 10.1039/a903208h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lane C, Snieckus V. Synlett. 2000:1294–1296. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bentz D, Laschat S. Synthesis. 2000:1766–1773. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rosillo M, Casarrubios L, Domínguez G, Pérez-Castells J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42(40):7029–7031. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)01313-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rosillo M, Domínguez G, Casarrubios L, Amador U, Pérez-Castells J. J Org Chem. 2004;69(6):2084–2093. doi: 10.1021/jo0356311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moreno-Mañas M, Pleixats R, Santamaria A. Synlett. 2001:1784–1786. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Duboc R, Hénaut C, Savignac M, Genet J-P, Bhatnagar N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:2461–2464. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)00177-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Saito N, Sato Y, Mori M. Org Lett. 2002;4:803–805. doi: 10.1021/ol017298y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Banti D, North M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:1561–1564. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4039(02)00009-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guo H, Madhushaw R J, Shen F-M, Liu R-S. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:5627–5637. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4020(02)00548-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lee H-Y, Kim H Y, Tae H, Kim B G, Lee J. Org Lett. 2003;5:3439–3442. doi: 10.1021/ol035194c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Evanno L, Deville A, Bodo B, Nay B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:4331–4333. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.04.107. See for an intramolecular version of this strategy. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Basu S, Ellinger B, Rizzo S, Deraeve C, Schürmann M, Preut H, Arndt H-D, Waldmann H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6805–6810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015269108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Basu S, Waldmann H. Bioorg Med Chem. 2014;22:4430–4444. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kaliappan K P, Ravikumar V. Org Biomol Chem. 2005;3:848–851. doi: 10.1039/b418659a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sayyad A A, Kaliappan K P. Eur J Org Chem. 2017:5055–5065. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201700599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Belfiore A, LeRoith D, editors. Principles of Endocrinology and Hormone Action. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018. ((Endocrinology)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Whirledge S, Cidlowski J A. Steroid Hormone Action. In: Strauss J F III, Barbieri R L, editors. Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 115–131.e4. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Litwack G. Human Biochemistry. London: Academic Press; 2018. Steroid hormones; pp. 467–506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Borah P, Chowdhury P. Curr Drug Ther. 2017;12:3–22. doi: 10.2174/1574885512666170109143715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.De Riccardis F, Izzo I, Di Filippo M, Sodano G, D'Acquisto F, Carnuccio R. Tetrahedron. 1997;53(31):10871–10882. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4020(97)00693-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.De Riccardis F, Meo D, Izzo I, Di Filippo M, Casapullo A. Eur J Org Chem. 1998:1965–1970. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0690(199809)1998:9<1965::aid-ejoc1965>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dao K-L, Sawant R R, Hendricks J A, Ronga V, Torchilin V P, Hanson R N. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23:785–795. doi: 10.1021/bc200645n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kim W S, Du K, Eastman A, Hughes R P, Micalizio G C. Nat Chem. 2018;10:70–77. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kim W S, Shalit Z A, Nguyen S M, Schoepke E, Eastman A, Burris T P, Gaur A B, Micalizio G C. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2448. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10415-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zheng Y, Tice C M, Singh S B. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:3673–3682. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.06.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Paryzek Z, Blaszczyk K. Can J Chem. 1987;65:229–233. doi: 10.1139/v87-037. See for examples of 3-spirosteroids and 17-spirosteroids. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tietze L F, Wölfling J, Schneider G, Noltemeyer M. Steroids. 1994;59:305–309. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(94)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kanchithalaivan S, Kumar R R, Perumal S. Steroids. 2013;78(4):409–417. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Morrow D F, Hofer R M, Culbertson T P. J Med Chem. 1967;10:133–138. doi: 10.1021/jm00314a001. See for 17-spirosteroids. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sólyom S, Szilágyi K, Toldy L. Steroids. 1980;35:361–380. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(80)90138-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nemoto H, Fujita S, Nagai M, Fukumoto K, Kametani T. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:2931–2938. doi: 10.1021/ja00217a040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rouillard F, Roy J, Poirier D. Eur J Org Chem. 2008:2446–2453. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200701077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Djigoué G B, Ngatcha B T, Roy J, Poirier D. Molecules. 2013;18:914–933. doi: 10.3390/molecules18010914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Laroche B, Detraz M, Blond A, Dubost L, Mailliet P, Nay B. J Org Chem. 2015;80:5359–5363. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
General experimental details, compound descriptions, 1H and 13C NMR spectra.






