Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2020 May 5;8:334. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00334

FeCoNi Sulfides Derived From In situ Sulfurization of Precursor Oxides as Oxygen Evolution Reaction Catalyst

Wanqing Teng 1, Mengtian Huo 1, Zhaomei Sun 1, Wenrong Yang 1, Xiangjiang Zheng 1,*, Caifeng Ding 2,*, Shusheng Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC7215084  PMID: 32432081

Abstract

It is highly promising to design and develop efficient and economical electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline solution. In this work, we prepare FeCoNi sulfide composites (including FeS, Co3S4, and Ni3S4) derived from in situ sulfurization of precursor oxides on carbon cloth (CC), which are used to become an OER catalyst. Such catalyst shows excellent OER performance, low overpotential, small Tafel slope, and high electrochemical stability, and it is a promising electrocatalyst for OER in alkaline media.

Keywords: oxygen evolution reaction, electrocatalyst, FeCoNi sulfides, nanowires array, in situ sulfurization

Introduction

The excessive consumption of fossil energy and the resulting serious environmental problems have triggered strong demand for renewable alternative energy (Chow et al., 2003; Zheng et al., 2014). Hydrogen energy is regarded as a clean and ideal energy carrier that could replace fossil energy (Dresselhaus and Thomas, 2001; Zheng et al., 2017, 2018b). Electrochemical water splitting provides us a promising strategy to largely produce hydrogen (Turner, 2004; Lu et al., 2017). However, hydrogen evolution is seriously restricted by anodic water oxidation due to the multi-electron transfer process and high activation energy barrier (Yin et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2017; Ke et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2018a; Tang et al., 2019). Therefore, efficient catalysts to reduce activation energy should be developed to boost the water oxidation process. Noble metal oxides (RuO2 and IrO2) exhibit excellent catalytic characters in oxygen evolution reaction (OER), but their widespread applications are limited due to scarce resources and high costs (Lee et al., 2012; Reier et al., 2012). Hence, it is necessary to develop efficient and economical OER electrocatalysts.

In recent years, transition-metal oxides and hydroxyl oxide have attracted great interest for catalysts (Lu et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Jin et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). Specifically, ferric oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) has shown efficient activity for the OER process (Chemelewski et al., 2014; Luo et al., 2017; Park et al., 2017). Regardless of its abundant reserves and low cost, its performance for OER has certain disparities in comparing with the noble metal catalysts. Many ways have been taken to improve catalysis performance, such as enhancing the conductivity of materials, increasing the specific surface area of materials, doping heteroatom modification, and so on (Feng et al., 2016a,b; Kuang et al., 2017; Li F. et al., 2018). Research shows that transition metal sulfides have better oxygen evolution catalysis performance than oxides because transit metal sulfides have diverse element composition, controllable electronic structure, and fast charge transfer speed (Liu et al., 2016; Chai et al., 2018; Li H. et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018).

In this manuscript, we design and develop FeCoNiS sulfides derived from in situ sulfurization of precursor oxides on carbon cloth (CC) through two-step hydrothermal methods. At first, FeCoNi-FeOOH nanoarray on CC is prepared through hydrothermal method. Secondly FeCoNiS sulfides derived from in-situ sulfurization is prepared through the second hydrothermal method. It shows excellent OER activity needing overpotentials of 220.5 and 269.9 mV to attain current densities of 10 and 100 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH. It is a promising electrocatalyst for OER in alkaline media.

Results and Discussions

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of these catalysts are shown in Figure 1A. There are two broad diffraction peaks on the bottom curve, which are the amorphous peaks of CC. The middle curve is the XRD pattern of the precursor oxides without sulfide treatment. The peaks at 11.95, 16.87, 26.91, 35.26, 46.69, 56.21, and 64.78° can be indexed to the (110), (200), (310), (211), (411), (521), and (541) planes of FeOOH phase (PDF No. 97-003-1136). The XRD pattern of the product after sulfide treatment is on the top. The diffraction peak intensity is obviously lower than that of the middle curve. For better structural analysis of the product, the powder of the precursor oxides and sulfide products scrapped from CC are characterized by XRD again. XRD curves are shown in Figures 1B,C. The main component of precursor oxides is still FeOOH. Considered that Co and Ni are in the precursor, we name the precursor as FeCoNi-FeOOH. The XRD curve of sulfide product shows that there are new phases, including Fe3O4 (PDF No.97-005-0272), FeS (PDF No. 04-003-4477), Ni3S4 (PDF No. 97-003-6721), and Co3S4 (PDF No. 00-047-1738). Part of FeOOH is reduced to Fe3O4, so the product is named FeCoNiS-FeOx.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of different oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts. (B) XRD patterns comparison of different catalysts powder. (C) XRD pattern of the product after sulfidation treatment.

Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) pattern of the precursor (FeCoNi-FeOOH) is shown in Figure 2A. There are specific and uniform nanowires array on the surface of CC. SEM pattern of FeCoNiS-FeOx is shown in Figure 2B. Obviously, the precursor (FeCoNi-FeOOH) nanowires are smooth, and the product (FeCoNiS-FeOx) is relatively rough. This means that the product has structural change after sulfidation, which corresponded to the XRD patterns in Figures 1B,C. The catalyst nanowire feature is also shown in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization (Figure 2C). Image taken from the product shows about 50-nm-thick nanowires. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) reveals that the product is highly crystallized with well-resolved lattice fringes (Figure 2D). The interplanar spacing of 0.331 nm could be assigned to the (310) plane of FeOOH.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) SEM pattern of precursor (FeCoNi-FeOOH). (B) SEM pattern of FeCoNiS-FeOx. (C) TEM pattern of FeCoNiS-FeOx. (D) HRTEM pattern of FeCoNiS-FeOx.

The corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) elemental mapping images of FeCoNiS-FeOx are shown in Figure 3A, which demonstrate unique distribution of Fe, Co, Ni, and S elements. EDX pattern is shown in Figure 3B, which exhibits types and relative amounts of different elements based on the position and intensity of element spectral lines.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping images of FeCoNiS-FeOx. (B) EDX element distribution pattern.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of FeCoNiS-FeOOH is shown in Figure 4, which was performed to characterize the chemical states of different elements. Figure 4A is full-scale XPS spectrum, further revealing the presences of Fe, Co, Ni, S, and O elements in the catalyst. As shown in Figure 4B, high-spin Fe3+ of FeOOH contains unpaired electrons and therefore exhibit multiplet structures in Fe 2p3/2 area. The characteristic peaks of Fe 2p1/2 is at 725.8 eV. The satellite peaks (identified as “Sat.”) are at 719.3 and 732.3 eV, which are relevant to Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 of FeOOH (Biesinger et al., 2011; Zeng et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2018). There are two peaks at 714.4 and 723.9 eV, which are relevant to Fe3O4. In Figure 4C, there exhibit two spin-orbit doublets. The first doublet is at 778.6 and 793.5 eV, assigned to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 of Co3+, and the second doublet was at 781.9 and 797.8 eV, arising from Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 of Co2+. In addition, two broad peaks located at 803.6 and 786.7 eV are attributed to the satellites, which indicated the presence of Co3S4 (Xiao et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2018; Wang X. et al., 2018).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of FeCoNiS-FeOx catalyst. (A) Survey spectrum. (B) Fe 2p. (C) Co 2p. (D) Ni 2p. (E) S 2p. (F) O 1s.

In the Ni 2p spectrum (Figure 4D), there exist two main peaks at 855.7 and 873.5 eV assignable, respectively to Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 spin orbit doublets and two satellite peaks (862.4 and 880.1 eV). By deconvolution of the two main peaks, the Ni 2p3/2 orbit comprises two peaks with binding energy of 853.6 and 856.7 eV, which corresponded, respectively to the Ni2+ and Ni3+ oxidation states, and the Ni 2p1/2 orbit can also be fitted into two peaks belonging to Ni2+ (871.5 eV) and Ni3+ (875.2 eV) (Hu et al., 2015; Qin et al., 2016; Sivanantham et al., 2016). There show S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 peaks at 161.7 and 162.8 eV in Figure 4E, which can be related to S2− (Wang H. et al., 2018). The component peak at 164.1 eV is characteristics of a metal–sulfur (M-S) bond (Ning et al., 2018). The peaks of 168.9 and 170.1 eV can be attributed to SO42- due to air oxidation (Cheng et al., 2015). In the O 1s region (Figure 4F), the peaks of 530.0, 531.9, and 533.8 eV are observed on the surface of the catalyst, which are corresponding to O2−, hydroxyl group, and adsorbed water molecules, respectively (Luo et al., 2017).

The catalysis performance of the catalyst in water oxidation reaction is evaluated by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), shown in Figure 5A. For comparison, LSV curves of different catalysts with similar loading amounts, including CC, RuO2, FeCoNi-FeOOH, FeCoNi-FeOx, FeCoNiS-FeOx, are also evaluated. Overpotentials in the same current density are often used to estimate the OER performance. FeCoNiS-FeOOH/CC exhibits outstanding OER performance with driving 100 mA cm−2 at a low overpotential of 269.9 mV, which is superior to RuO2/CC and FeCoNi-FeOOH under the same conditions. FeCoNi-FeOx is prepared through second hydrothermal method without sulfurizing reagent. The OER activity of FeCoNi-FeOx is lower than FeCoNi-FeOOH. The existence of Fe3O4 will not enhance catalytic reactivity. The main active site of FeCoNiS-FeOx is FeCoNi sulfides. Tafel plots of different OER catalysts were shown in Figure 5B, which are used to evaluate the catalytic kinetics. The Tafel slope of FeCoNiS-FeOx is 45.1 mV dec−1, lower than that of RuO2/CC (52.3 mV dec−1). It demonstrates that the FeCoNiS-FeOx catalyst has more rapid reaction velocity in OER catalytic reaction.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of different oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts. (B) Tafel curves of different OER catalysts. (C) LSV curve of FeCoNiS-FeOx catalyst and another curve after 500 CV cycles. (D) Time-dependent current density curve of FeCoNiS-FeOx OER catalyst under constant potential.

Another important performance, stability of catalyst, is investigated by cyclic voltammetry and potentiostatic method. As shown in Figure 5C, there shows a comparison of two polarization curves, including original curve and another curve after 500 CV cycles. When the potential is 1.5 V, the current density is only 3% decrease after 500 cycles, which demonstrates that the FeCoNiS-FeOx catalyst has a good cycle life. In Figure 5D, the electrochemical stability of FeCoNiS-FeOOH/CC is tested by potentiostatic electrolysis at a constant potential of 1.48 V for 30 h. There is only 5% decay of current density, which demonstrated the good long-term durability of the catalyst. Multistep chronopotentiometric curve of FeCoNiS-FeOx is shown in Figure 6. There are 12 steps and the increment of current density is 20 mA cm−2 per 500 s. In every step, the corresponding potential remains constant. These results indicate that the catalyst has excellent conductivity and good mass transportation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Multistep chronopotentiometric of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst. The current density started at 60 mA cm−2 and finished at 280 mA cm−2, with an increment of 20 mA cm−2 per 500 s without ohmic potential drop (IR) correction.

Conclusions

In this paper, a two-step hydrothermal routine is adopted to prepare FeCoNiS-FeOx catalyst. At first, hydroxide nanowire array precursor is prepared. The precursor nanowire arrays serve as backbones for the catalyst not only constructs effective conductive channels but also provides rich active sites. Secondly, the final product is prepared via anion exchange and redox reactions with Na2S as sulfurizing reagent. The catalyst shows excellent OER activity needing overpotentials of 220.5 and 269.9 mV to attain current densities of 10 and 100 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH. Typically, the catalyst also shows long-term electrochemical stability for at least 30 h. The good catalysis performance is due to FeS, Co3S4, and Ni3S4. CC as substrate could enhance the conductivity of the material. Nanowire structure could increase the surface area of materials and expose more active sites. Most importantly, transition-metal sulfide could optimize material structure and give a full play to the synergy effect between different elements. FeCoNiS-FeOx catalyst is a promising electrocatalyst for OER in alkaline media.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Ferric nitrate [Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, Mw = 404.00], nickel nitrate [Ni(NO3)2.6H2O, Mw = 290.79], cobalt nitrate [Co(NO3)2.6H2O, Mw = 291.03], ammonium fluoride NH4F, Mw = 37.0), urea [CO(NH2)2, Mw = 60.06], potassium hydroxide (KOH, Mw = 56.1) are provided by Shanghai Aladdin Ltd. Sodium sulfide (Na2S, Mw = 78.04) and ruthenium chloride (RuCl3.3H2O ≥ 43%) are bought from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. CC is supplied by Jingchong electronics technology company. The surface must be free from oil and dirt, then acetone, hydrochloric acid (3 mol/L), ethanol, and ultrapure water are used to clean the surface of CC. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ.cm) is used to prepare all aqueous solutions in this work. None of the reagents as received are further purified.

Preparation of Precursor

Fe(NO3)3.9H2O 0.323 g, Ni(NO3)2.6H2O 0.058 g, Co(NO3)2.6H2O 0.058 g, NH4F 0.03 g, CO(NH2)2 0.12 g are added to 20 ml ultrapure water to form mixture solution after 30 min stirring. The final solution and the pretreated CC are sealed in a 30-ml Teflon-lined stainless-steel high-pressure reactor and maintained at 120°C for 5 h. Then, the product is naturally cooled to room temperature. The product is taken from the reactor and washed for three times with ultrapure water and ethanol successively. Dried under 60°C for 2 h.

Preparation of FeCoNiS-FeOx Nanowire

First, 0.035 g sodium sulfide is added to 20 ml ultrapure water with stirring. The formed solution and the precursor are sealed in a 30-ml Teflon-lined stainless-steel high-pressure reactor and maintain at 120°C for 3 h. After naturally cooling to room temperature, the product is washed with ultrapure water and ethanol successively. At last, the product is dried for 2 h under 60°C.

Characterizations

A diffractometer (RigakuD/MAX 2550, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å) is used to perform XRD characterization. The scan range is from 5 to 80° with a scanning rate of 5°/min. SEM characterizations are realized on a MERLIN compact SEM with the accelerating voltage of 20 kV. TEM characterizations are realized on TEM of Zeiss Libra 200FE with operation voltage of 200 kV. An ESCALABMK II X-ray photoelectron spectrometer is used to measure XPS spectrum with Mg as the exciting source.

Electrochemical Measurements

A CHI 660E electrochemical analyzer (CH Instruments, Inc., Shanghai) is used to perform all the electrochemical tests. In order to better characterize the electrode reaction, a three-electrode system is adopted. The catalysts/CC is used as working electrode. Mercuric oxide electrode (Hg-HgO) is as contrast electrode. Graphite rod is as auxiliary electrode. Potassium hydroxide solution (1.0 M) is used as the working electrolyte solution. All experiments are realized at 25°C. All potentials for LSV curves are calibrated on reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale [E (RHE) = E + 0.059 × 14 + 0.098]. Unless stated otherwise, all LSV potentials are calibrated with ohmic potential drop (IR) due to solution resistance. Overpotentials (ΔE) are calculated based on the equation ΔE = E (RHE) - IR - 1.23.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article.

Author Contributions

WT has done the experimental work. MH, ZS, and WY helped in characterization. XZ has written the manuscript. CD and SZ have revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014BL025).

References

  1. Biesinger M. C., Payne B. P., Grosvenor A. P., Lau L. W. M., Gerson A. R., Smart R. S. C. (2011). Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surface Sci. 257, 2717–2730. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chai Y.-M., Shang X., Liu Z.-Z., Dong B., Han G.-Q., Gao W.-K., et al. (2018). Ripple-like NiFeCo sulfides on nickel foam derived from in-situ sulfurization of precursor oxides as efficient anodes for water oxidation. Appl. Surface Sci. 428, 370–376. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.122 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chemelewski W. D., Lee H. C., Lin J. F., Bard A. J., Mullins C. B. (2014). Amorphous FeOOH oxygen evolution reaction catalyst for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 2843–2850. 10.1021/ja411835a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng N., Liu Q., Asiri A. M., Xing W., Sun X. (2015). A Fe-doped Ni3S2particle film as a high-efficiency robust oxygen evolution electrode with very high current density. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 23207–23212. 10.1039/c5ta06788j [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chow J., Kopp R. J., Portney P. R. (2003). Energy resources and global development. Science 302, 1528–1531. 10.1126/science.1091939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dresselhaus M. S., Thomas I. L. (2001). Alternative energy technologies. Nature 414, 332–337. 10.1038/35104599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng J. X., Xu H., Dong Y. T., Ye S. H., Tong Y. X., Li G. R. (2016a). FeOOH/Co/FeOOH hybrid nanotube arrays as high-performance electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 55, 3694–3698. 10.1002/anie.201511447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng J. X., Ye S. H., Xu H., Tong Y. X., Li G. R. (2016b). Design and synthesis of FeOOH/CeO2 heterolayered nanotube electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 28, 4698–4703. 10.1002/adma.201600054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao Z., Chen C., Chang J., Chen L., Wang P., Wu D., et al. (2018). Porous Co3S4@Ni3S4 heterostructure arrays electrode with vertical electrons and ions channels for efficient hybrid supercapacitor. Chem. Eng. J. 343, 572–582. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo X., Kong R.-M., Zhang X., Du H., Qu F. (2017). Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles embedded in conductive microrod array: an efficient and durable electrocatalyst for alkaline oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 8, 651–655. 10.1021/acscatal.7b03406 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu Q., Ma W., Liang G., Nan H., Zheng X., Zhang X. (2015). Anion-exchange reaction synthesized CoNi2S4 nanowires for superior electrochemical performances. RSC Adv. 5, 84974–84979. 10.1039/c5ra18625k [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jin Y., Huang S., Yue X., Du H., Shen P. K. (2018). Mo- and Fe-Modified Ni(OH)2/NiOOH nanosheets as highly active and stable electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 8, 2359–2363. 10.1021/acscatal.7b04226 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ke Z., Wang H., He D., Song X., Tang C., Liu J., et al. (2018). Co2P nanoparticles wrapped in amorphous porous carbon as an efficient and stable catalyst for water oxidation. Front. Chem. 6:580. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuang M., Wang Q., Ge H., Han P., Gu Z., Al-Enizi A. M., et al. (2017). CuCoOx/FeOOH Core–shell nanowires as an efficient bifunctional oxygen evolution and reduction catalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 2498–2505. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00835 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee Y., Suntivich J., May K. J., Perry E. E., Shao-Horn Y. (2012). Synthesis and activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 399–404. 10.1021/jz2016507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li F., Du J., Li X., Shen J., Wang Y., Zhu Y., et al. (2018). Integration of FeOOH and Zeolitic imidazolate framework-derived nanoporous carbon as an efficient electrocatalyst for water oxidation. Adv. Energy Mater. 8:1702598 10.1002/aenm.201702598 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li H., Chen S., Zhang Y., Zhang Q., Jia X., Zhang Q., et al. (2018). Systematic design of superaerophobic nanotube-array electrode comprised of transition-metal sulfides for overall water splitting. Nat. Commun. 9:2452. 10.1038/s41467-018-04888-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu D., Lu Q., Luo Y., Sun X., Asiri A. M. (2015). NiCo2S4 nanowires array as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for full water splitting with superior activity. Nanoscale 7, 15122–15126. 10.1039/c5nr04064g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu T., Sun X., Asiri A. M., He Y. (2016). One-step electrodeposition of Ni–Co–S nanosheets film as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient water splitting. Int. J. Hydr. Energy 41, 7264–7269. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.111 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu W., Liu T., Xie L., Tang C., Liu D., Hao S., et al. (2017). In situ derived CoB nanoarray: a high-efficiency and durable 3D bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall alkaline water splitting. Small 13:1700805. 10.1002/smll.201700805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu Z., Qian L., Xu W., Tian Y., Jiang M., Li Y., et al. (2016). Dehydrated layered double hydroxides: Alcohothermal synthesis and oxygen evolution activity. Nano Res. 9, 3152–3161. 10.1007/s12274-016-1197-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luo W., Jiang C., Li Y., Shevlin S. A., Han X., Qiu K., et al. (2017). Highly crystallized α-FeOOH for a stable and efficient oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 2021–2028. 10.1039/c6ta08719a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ning Y., Ma D., Shen Y., Wang F., Zhang X. (2018). Constructing hierarchical mushroom-like bifunctional NiCo/NiCo2S4@NiCo/Ni foam electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting in alkaline media. Electrochim. Acta 265, 19–31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.150 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Park G., Kim Y. I., Kim Y. H., Park M., Jang K. Y., Song H., et al. (2017). Preparation and phase transition of FeOOH nanorods: strain effects on catalytic water oxidation. Nanoscale 9, 4751–4758. 10.1039/c6nr09790a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Qin Z., Chen Y., Huang Z., Su J., Diao Z., Guo L. (2016). Composition-dependent catalytic activities of noble-metal-free NiS/Ni3S4 for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 14581–14589. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05230 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reier T., Oezaslan M., Strasser P. (2012). Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction, (OER). on Ru, Ir, and Pt catalysts: a comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACS Catal. 2, 1765–1772. 10.1021/cs3003098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sivanantham A., Ganesan P., Shanmugam S. (2016). Hierarchical NiCo2S4nanowire arrays supported on ni foam: an efficient and durable bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26:201600566 10.1002/adfm.201600566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tang Y., Zheng S., Xue H., Pang H. (2019). Regulation of the Ni(2+). Content in a Hierarchical Urchin-Like MOF for high-performance electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Front. Chem. 7:411 10.3389/fchem.2019.00411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Turner J. A. (2004). Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305, 972–974. 10.1126/science.1103197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang H., Yang J., Yang L., Zhang G., Liu C., Tang H., et al. (2018). FeCoNi sulphide-derived nanodots as electrocatalysts for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Funct. Mater. Lett. 11:1850058 10.1142/s1793604718500583 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang X., Liu C., Li Q., Li H., Xu J., Chu X., et al. (2018). 3D Heterogeneous Co3O4@Co3S4 Nanoarrays grown on Ni Foam as a binder-free electrode for lithium-ion batteries. ChemElectroChem 5, 309–315. 10.1002/celc.201701050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiao J., Wan L., Yang S., Xiao F., Wang S. (2014). Design hierarchical electrodes with highly conductive NiCo2S4 nanotube arrays grown on carbon fiber paper for high-performance pseudocapacitors. Nano Lett. 14, 831–838. 10.1021/nl404199v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang L., Xie L., Ren X., Wang Z., Liu Z., Du G., et al. (2017). Hierarchical CuCo2S4 nanoarrays for high-efficient and durable water oxidation electrocatalysis. Chem. Commun. 54, 78–81. 10.1039/c7cc07259g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yin Q., Tan J. M., Besson C., Geletii Y. V., Musaev D. G., Kuznetsov A. E., et al. (2010). A fast soluble carbon-free molecular water oxidation catalyst based on abundant metals. Science 328, 342–345. 10.1126/science.1185372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zeng L., Ren W., Zheng J., Wu A., Cui P. (2012). Synthesis of water-soluble FeOOH nanospindles and their performance for magnetic resonance imaging. Appl. Surface Sci. 258, 2570–2575. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.093 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang L., Zhang R., Ge R., Ren X., Hao S., Xie F., et al. (2017). Facilitating active species generation by amorphous NiFe-Bi layer formation on NiFe-LDH nanoarray for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution at alkaline pH. Chem. A Eur. J. 23, 11499–11503. 10.1002/chem.201702745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang S., Sun Y., Liao F., Shen Y., Shi H., Shao M. (2018). Co9S8-CuS-FeS trimetal sulfides for excellent oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis. Electrochim. Acta 283, 1695–1701. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.133 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao Q., Yang J., Liu M., Wang R., Zhang G., Wang H., et al. (2018). Tuning electronic Push/Pull of Ni-based hydroxides to enhance hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions for water splitting. ACS Catal. 8, 5621–5629. 10.1021/acscatal.8b01567 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zheng X., Song X., Wang X., Zhang Z., Sun Z., Guo Y. (2018a). Nickel–copper bimetal organic framework nanosheets as a highly efficient catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. N. J. Chem. 42, 8346–8350. 10.1039/c8nj01035h [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zheng X., Zhang J., Sun Z., Zhang Z., Xi D. (2018b). Fabrication of Amorphous Cu-Co-P Nanofilms on CuCo2O4 anoarrays by in situ electrochemical reduction for efficient hydrogen evolution in alkaline solution. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 3565–3569. 10.1002/ejic.201800492 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zheng Y., Jiao Y., Zhu Y., Cai Q., Vasileff A., Li L. H., et al. (2017). Molecule-level g-C3N4 coordinated transition metals as a new class of electrocatalysts for oxygen electrode reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3336–3339. 10.1021/jacs.6b13100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zheng Y., Jiao Y., Zhu Y., Li L. H., Han Y., Chen Y., et al. (2014). Hydrogen evolution by a metal-free electrocatalyst. Nat. Commun. 5:3783. 10.1038/ncomms4783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou Q., Chen Y., Zhao G., Lin Y., Yu Z., Xu X., et al. (2018). Active-site-enriched iron-doped Nickel/Cobalt hydroxide nanosheets for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catalysis 8, 5382–5390. 10.1021/acscatal.8b01332 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article.

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES