Skip to main content
Frontiers in Psychology logoLink to Frontiers in Psychology
. 2020 May 5;11:937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00937

Corrigendum: Leadership Training to Increase Need Satisfaction at Work: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Method Study

Susanne Tafvelin 1,*, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz 2,3, Andreas Stenling 1
PMCID: PMC7216307  PMID: 32431654

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. Autonomy support ratings for employees across the three time points were missing. There were also some minor formatting errors that have been corrected. The corrected Table 1 appears below.

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants at baseline and descriptive statistics of the study variables.

T1 (Baseline) T2 T3
Control Experimental Control Experimental Control Experimental
M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD
Managers
Age 45.06 7.25 42.50 9.21
Tenure as manager 5.53 8.84 6.45 6.58
Number of employees 24.29 11.88 24.2 10.31
Autonomy support* 4.19 0.50 3.85 0.36 4.17 0.49 3.75 0.45 4.08 0.51 3.86 0.30
Competence support 3.57 0.53 3.54 0.40 3.67 0.54 3.50 0.35 3.61 0.49 3.65 0.35
Relatedness support 4.31 0.55 4.18 0.43 4.15 0.50 4.04 0.34 4.23 0.49 4.05 0.36
Employees
Age 44.59 11.37 43.99 11.90
Tenure 9.61 8.74 9.45 8.33
Years with manager* 0.52 0.67 1.01 0.84
Autonomy support 3.72 0.87 3.85 0.82 3.80 0.79 3.85 0.84 3.79 0.81 3.84 0.78
Competence support 3.50 0.88 3.64 0.83 3.50 0.91 3.65 0.88 3.54 0.90 3.62 0.89
Relatedness support 3.97 0.85 4.09 0.83 3.99 0.83 4.06 0.84 3.98 0.84 4.00 0.86
Autonomy* 3.88 0.56 3.76 0.67 3.79 0.60 3.75 0.66 3.83 0.59 3.74 0.56
Competence 4.15 0.51 4.19 0.54 4.12 0.60 4.09 0.60 4.03 0.49 4.15 0.58
Relatedness 4.18 0.71 4.03 0.72 4.12 0.73 4.00 0.72 4.04 0.68 4.02 0.67
Job satisfaction 2.82 0.56 2.75 0.55 2.81 0.53 2.75 0.57 2.81 0.57 2.73 0.58
Vigor 4.50 1.00 4.33 1.09 4.39 1.13 4.19 1.20 4.39 1.07 4.19 1.18
Burnout 2.35 0.76 2.34 0.74 2.41 0.86 2.41 0.82 2.32 0.81 2.37 0.79
Work performance 7.77 1.35 7.68 1.41 7.52 1.48 7.47 1.75 7.53 1.57 7.58 1.54
*

Statistically significant difference between the control and experimental group at T1 (p <0.05).

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.


Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES