Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;9(5):giaa045. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa045

Table 3:

REAPR statistics showing the percentage of error-free bases in the assembly, N50s before and after breaking at breakpoints, the percentage decrease in scaffold N50 after breaking, and the fragment coverage distribution (FCD) errors including errors across gaps

No. Assembly name % error-free Original N50 (Mb) REAPR broken N50 (Mb) % reduction FCD errors
A1 w2rap 80.83 0.3 0.29 2 6,065
A2 w2rap + lmp 79.10 2.61 1.13 57 8,213
A3 10x 85.90 5.26 1.69 68 11,379
A4 10x + lmp 85.35 10.33 1.86 82 9,095
A5 w2rap + bionano 76.05 0.85 0.52 38 4,523
A6 w2rap + lmp + bionano 78.38 5.73 2.06 64 7,392
A7 10x + bionano 84.65 10.84 2.00 82 13,068
A8 10x + lmp + bionano 84.75 21.00 1.86 91 11,531
A9 w2rap + 10x 81.09 5.58 0.57 90 7,601
A10 w2rap + lmp + bionano + 10x 77.80 14.05 1.75 88 9,488