Abstract
Background
Increased access to heart valves through early surgery and progress in molecular microbiology have reduced the proportion of infective endocarditis (IE) with no microbiological documentation and increased the proportion of IE associated with unusual microorganisms.
Methods
We performed an ancillary study of a large prospective population-based survey on IE. Unusual-microorganism IE was defined as definite IE (Duke-Li criteria) due to microorganisms other than streptococci, staphylococci, or enterococci.
Results
Of 471 cases of documented IE, 46 (9.8%) were due to unusal microorganisms; the following were involved in >1 case: Candida albicans (n = 4), Cutibacterium acnes (n = 4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 3), Cardiobacterium hominis (n = 3), and Coxiella burnetii (n = 2). Cases were documented with blood cultures (n = 37, 80.4%), heart valve polymerase chain reaction (PCR; n = 5), heart valve culture (n = 2), PCR on vertebral biopsy (n = 1), or serology (n = 1). As compared with IE due to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci (n = 420), IE due to unusual microorganisms occurred more frequently in patients with previously known heart disease (69.0% vs 44.3%; P = .002), prosthetic valve (40.5% vs 18.1%; P = .0006), longer duration of fever (mean, 35.1 ± 46.8 days vs 12.5 ± 17.8; P = .003), and who were more often nosocomial (38.1% vs 20.2%; P = .02).
Conclusions
In this population-based study, 9.8% of IE cases were due to unusual microorganisms, with a predominance of anaerobes, yeast, and gram-negative bacilli. As compared with IE related to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci, IE cases related to unusual microorganisms were associated with previously known heart disease, prosthetic valve, longer duration of fever, and nosocomial acquisition.
Trial registration
ORCID 0000-0003-3617-5411
Keywords: Candida sp, Cutibacterium acnes, endocarditis, HACEK, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
In this population-based study, 10% of endocarditis were due to microorganisms other than staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci. These included anaerobes, yeasts, or Gram-negative bacilli, with an increased risk in patients with heart disease, prosthetic valve, prolonged fever, and nosocomial endocarditis.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening disease, mostly related to staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci, altogether responsible for 80%–90% of IE cases in large cohort studies from Europe, North America, or Oceania [1, 2]. In the recent European guidelines [3], empirical treatment of IE in acutely ill patients targets these gram-positive cocci, although other microorganisms are found in 5%–10% of IE. Unusual microorganisms, defined as those “other than staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci,” include (i) bacteria with documented tropism for cardiac valves, but accounting for a small proportion of IE cases (eg, HACEK group, Coxiella burnettii, Bartonella sp., Tropheryma whipplei); (ii) pathogens commonly encountered in other sites, but with very low propensity to affect cardiac valves (eg, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., strict anaerobes).
Unusual microorganisms have attracted limited attention to date and have mostly been reported as “miscellaneous” in cohort studies because of their heterogeneity and their low prevalence [4, 5]. However, better awareness of the risk factors for and the characteristics of these unusual microorganisms would be of interest, as some of them may not be susceptible to commonly used empiric antimicrobial regimens. We performed an ancillary study of a large prospective population-based survey on definite IE to better characterize IE due to unusual microorganisms.
METHODS
For this study, we analyzed the database created for the purpose of the French population-based epidemiological survey on IE in 2008, whose methods and results have been published elsewhere [6]. In brief, this survey was conducted in 7 regions of France (Paris, Lorraine, Rhône-Alpes, Franche-Comte, Marne, Ille-et-Vilaine, Languedoc-Roussillon), representing a population pool of 16 million inhabitants, 31.9% of the whole French population. All IE cases diagnosed in adults during the study period were reported. A standardized case report form (CRF) was prospectively filled out, and each case was validated by an adjudication committee, including screening for Duke-Li criteria, and confirmation of the causative pathogen. All IE cases that were not classified as definite according to the Duke-Li criteria [7] were excluded from further analysis.
The following information was collected: sex, age, previously known heart disease, comorbidities (including diabetes mellitus, cancer, dialysis, and immunosuppressive therapy), Charlson comorbidity index [8], procedures and other risk factors for IE, date of first symptoms, date of hospital admission, IE diagnosis, and treatment, signs and symptoms of IE, echocardiography, microbiology, imaging studies, treatment, and outcome. Location of IE was determined by echocardiographic findings and could be updated by surgical findings. The mode of IE acquisition was categorized on the basis of 3 mutually exclusive classes: (i) injection drug use–associated IE; (ii) community-acquired IE; and (iii) health care–associated IE, which included nosocomial and non-nosocomial IE, according to prior definitions [6]. Community-acquired IE was considered in patients whose symptoms had started before or within 48 hours of admission and who did not meet criteria for health care–associated infection. Health care–associated IE was considered nosocomial if the first symptoms developed >48 hours after admission and up to 30 days after discharge from the hospital (up to 1 year after implantation of valve prostheses and up to 3 years for coagulase-negative staphylococci-infected intracardiac devices). Health care–associated IE was considered non-nosocomial if the patient had developed signs or symptoms consistent with IE before hospitalization and had undergone health care procedures (intravenous therapy, wound care, specialized nursing care at home, hemodialysis, or intravenous chemotherapy) outside a hospital within the 30 days before the onset of IE.
Microbiological data included the total number of blood culture samples, the number of blood cultures with positive results, results of valve culture, results of serological tests, results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of resected material, and causative microorganisms identified using classical culture methods, molecular biology, and/or serology. Unusual-microorganism IE was defined as IE due to microorganisms other than streptococci, staphylococci, or enterococci. For the comparison between IE due to unusual microorganisms and IE due to usual microorganisms, we excluded polymicrobial IE. The study was approved by an institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Besançon, France). Patients were informed about the study but did not have to provide individual consent, in accordance with French legal standards.
Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± SD or as median and interquartile range (IQR). Qualitative variables were described as number (%). Continuous variables were compared using the Student test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The level of significance α was set at .05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
RESULTS
From January 1 to December 31, 2008, 497 patients were diagnosed with definite IE, with 471 cases (94.8%) being microbiologically documented: streptococci and other Streptococcaceae, n = 188 (37.8%), staphylococci, n = 180 (36.2%), enterococci, n = 52 (10.5%), other microorganisms, n = 42 (8.5%), and polymicrobial, n = 9 (1.8%). Among the 9 polymicrobial IE, 4 included at least 1 unusual microorganism: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Candida pelliculosa (formerly Pichia anomala), Candida albicans and Candida glabrata, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus capitis, Haemophilus spp., and Streptococcus gordonii. The characteristics of the 42 cases of definite nonpolymicrobial IE involving unusual microorganisms are summarized in Table 1, and the list of these unusual microorganisms is presented in Table 2. The following species accounted for >1 case: Candida albicans (n = 4), Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes, n = 4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 3), Cardiobacterium hominis (n = 3), and Coxiella burnetii (n = 2). Seven patients had HACEK IE due to C. hominis (n = 3), Haemophilus spp. (n = 3), and Aggregatibacter spp. (n = 1). Four patients had Enterobacteriaceae IE (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabilis, 1 case each). Most cases were diagnosed with blood cultures (n = 37, 80.4%). The 9 cases of blood culture–negative IE were diagnosed by cardiac valve PCR (n = 5), valve culture (n = 2), PCR on vertebral biopsy (n = 1), and serology (n = 1).
Table 1. .
Characteristics of Infective Endocarditis due to Unusual Microorganisms (n = 42, Polymicrobial Cases Excluded)
| Patients | |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 62 (51–70) |
| Male sex | 32 (76.2) |
| Comorbidity(ies) | 21 (50.0) |
| Previously known heart disease | 29 (69.0) |
| Prosthetic valve | 17 (40.5) |
| Pacemaker or intracardiac defibrillator | 9 (21.4) |
| Location of infective endocarditis | |
| Aortic | 16 (38.1) |
| Mitral | 13 (30.9) |
| Aortic and mitral | 5 (11.9) |
| Cardiac lesions | |
| Vegetation | 32 (76.2) |
| Abscess | 6 (14.3) |
| Dehiscence | 6 (14.3) |
| Complications | |
| Embolic events (extracerebral) | 11a (26.2) |
| Septic shock | 6 (14.3) |
| Spondylodiscitis or septic arthritis | 4 (9.5) |
| Treatment | |
| Duration of anti-infective treatment, d | 45.5 (36.5–72) |
| Cardiac surgery | 19 (45.2) |
| Time between anti-infective treatment start and surgery, d | 4 (1.5–14) |
Data are expressed as number (%) or median (interquartile range).
aNine splenic, 1 pulmonary, 1 peripheral.
Table 2. .
Unusual Microorganisms Documented by Culture, Serology, or PCR in Definite IE Cases (n = 46, Including 4 Polymicrobial Cases)
| Microorganismsa | Total | Blood Culture | Valve or Other Site (Culture/PCR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HACEK | |||
| Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Cardiobacterium hominis (i) | 3 | 2 | 1 (valve PCR) |
| Haemophilus spp. (i) | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Haemophilus parainfluenzae (i) | 1 | 0 | 1 (valve PCR) |
| Gram-negative bacilli | |||
| Acinetobacter ursingii (ii) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Campylobacter fetus (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Escherichia coli (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Francisella tularensis (ii) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Klebsiella pneumonia (i) | 1 | 1 | 1 (valve culture) |
| Proteus mirabilis (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ii) | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Serratia marcescens (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (ii) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Gram-negative cocci | |||
| Moraxella catarrhalis (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Neisseria elongata (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Gram-positive bacilli | |||
| Bacillus cereus (ii) | 1 | 0 | 1 (pacemaker culture) |
| Corynebacterium jeikeium (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Corynebacterium mucifaciens (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ii) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Gordonia bronchialis (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Lactobacillus rhamnosus (i) | 1 | 0 | 1 (PCR on vertebral biopsy) |
| Lactobacillus spp. (i) | 2 | 2 | 2 (valve culture) |
| Listeria monocytogenes (ii) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Anaerobes | |||
| Catabacter honkongensis (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Cutibacterium acnes (i) | 4 | 2 | 2 (valve culture) |
| Veillonella spp. (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Other bacteria | |||
| Bartonella quintana (ii) | 1 | 0 | 1 (valve PCR) |
| Coxiella burnetii (ii) | 2b | 0 | 1 (valve PCR) |
| Tropheryma whipplei (ii) | 1 | 0 | 1 (valve PCR) |
| Yeasts | |||
| Candida albicans (i) | 4 | 4 | 1 (valve culture) |
| Candida parapsilosis (i) | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Candida glabrata (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Candida spp. (i) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Candida pelliculosa (i) | 1 | 0 | 1 (valve culture) |
Abbreviations: IE, infective endocarditis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
aMicroorganisms were categorized as (i) endogenous; (ii) exogenous (environment, zoonosis).
bIn 1 case, diagnosis relied on serology.
The mean age of patients with nonpolymicrobial IE related to unusual microorganisms was 60.7 ± 14.2 years (median [IQR], 62 [51–70] years), and 32 patients (76.2%) were men. As compared with patients with nonpolymicrobial IE related to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci (Table 3), IE related to unusual microorganisms was more common in patients with previously known heart disease (69.0% vs 44.3%; P = .002), prosthetic valve (40.5% vs 18.1%; P = .0006), nosocomial IE (38.1% vs 20.2%; P = .02), and prolonged fever (mean ± SD, 35.1 ± 46.8 days vs 12.5 ± 17.8; P = .003). Comparison of staphylococci IE, streptococci/enterococci IE, and unusual-microorganism IE is presented in Supplementary Table 1.
Table 3. .
Comparison of Endocarditis due to Staphylococci, Streptococci, or Enterococci (n = 420) and Endocarditis Due to Unusual Microorganisms (n = 42), Polymicrobial Cases Excluded
| Staphylococci, Streptococci, or Enterococci IE (n = 420) | Unusual Microorganisms IE (n = 42) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients’ characteristics | |||
| Age, y | 62.8 ± 16.0 | 60.7 ± 14.2 | .42 |
| Male sex | 317 (75.5) | 32 (76.2) | .92 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 1.9 ± 2.2 | 2.3 ± 2.7 | .52 |
| ≥1 comorbidity | 196 (46.7) | 21 (50.0) | .68 |
| Cardiac history | |||
| Previously known heart disease | 186 (44.3) | 29 (69.0) | .002 |
| Prosthetic valve | 76 (18.1) | 17 (40.5) | .0006 |
| Intracardiac device (PM or ICD) | 53 (12.6) | 9 (21.4) | .11 |
| Mode of acquisition | .018 | ||
| Community-acquired IE | 313 (73.6) | 26 (61.9) | |
| Nosocomial IE | 83 (20.2) | 16 (38.1) | |
| Health care–associated, non-nosocomial IE | 14 (3.4) | 0 | |
| Clinical and biological features | |||
| Time to IE diagnosis <4 d after admission | 200 (47.7) | 15 (35.7) | .14 |
| Vegetation(s) | 375 (89.3) | 32 (76.2) | .13 |
| Fever | 367 (87.8) | 32 (76.2) | .77 |
| Fever duration, d | 12.5 ± 17.8 | 35.1 ± 46.8 | .003 |
| Outcome | |||
| Cardiac surgery | 182 (43.3) | 19 (45.2) | .81 |
| In-hospital death | 101 (24.0) | 6 (14.3) | .15 |
Data are expressed as number (%) of patients or mean ± SD. In bold: P values < 0.05.
Abbreviations: ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; IE, infective endocarditis; PM, pacemaker.
DISCUSSSION
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first population-based prospective study on IE due to unusual mircrooganisms. We found that 9.8% of documented IE involved unusual microorganisms, with C. albicans (n = 4), C. acnes (n = 4), P. aeruginosa (n = 3), C. hominis (n = 3), and C. burnetii (n = 2) being the most common unusual microorganisms. Previously known heart disease, prosthetic valve, nosocomial acquisition, and prolonged fever were more common in endocarditis due to unusual microorganisms, as compared with staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci. In our study, most cases of IE related to unusual microorganisms were diagnosed by blood cultures (n = 37, 80.4%).
Contrary to recent series of blood culture–negative endocarditis, largely dominated by 2 zoonotic pathogens, that is, C. burnettii and Bartonella sp. [5, 9–12], the spectrum of unusual microorganisms potentially responsible for IE appears broad, distributed in gram-negative bacilli (n = 11), gram-positive bacilli (n = 9), yeasts (n = 9), HACEK group (n = 7), anaerobes (n = 6), gram-negative cocci (n = 2), and others (n = 4). The proportion of IE related to strict anaerobes in our cohort (6/497, 1.2%) is in line with a recent prospective cohort in Spain [13], in which 0.9% of IE cases were due to strict anerobes, primarily C. acnes [14], as in our cohort. Likewise, the proportion of IE related to HACEK bacteria (7/497, 1.4%), Enterobacteriaceae (4/497, 0.8%), and P. aeruginosa (3/497, 0.6%) in our study is in the usual range for large cohort studies, such as the International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE), that is, 0.5%–3% of all IE cases [15–17].
Microbiological documentation of IE has dramatically improved over the last decades in developed countries, thanks to (i) the development of cardiac surgery during the acute phase of IE, which provides access to heart valves in up to half of patients with IE [6]; (ii) molecular biology, especially 16S rDNA PCR—the so-called “universal bacterial PCR”—which allows the identification of almost any bacteria encountered in IE, even when antibiotics have been initated before sampling [5, 11, 18]. These developments have reduced the proportion of IE with no microbiological documentation to <5% in contemporary cohort studies [6], while physicians and microbiologists are increasingly confronted with unexpected organisms identified by 16S rDNA on heart valves [18]. As about 20% of the unusual microorganisms were yeasts in our study, additional molecular tools targeting fungi, such as 18S and 28S rDNA PCR, may be of value.
We found that unusual microorganisms are more commonly encountered in patients with previously known heart disease, prosthetic valve, or nosocomial IE. This reflects that specific predisposing conditions as well as nosocomial acquisition enlarge the spectrum of pathogens potentially associated with IE. Candida spp. and P. aeruginosa, both closely associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections, were among the top 4 pathogens identified in our study. Patients with IE related to unusual microorganisms had longer duration of fever compared with patients with staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci IE. This may reflect (i) delayed diagnosis, due to longer time to positivity for blood cultures [19], or the need to wait for PCR on excised heart valves in patients with blood culture–negative IE; (ii) inactive empirical treatment, as most empirical treatment do not target unusual microorganisms; (iii) slower clinical response, even with appropriate anti-infective treatment, as may be expected with fastidious (ie, difficult-to-grow) microorganisms [4], or Candida spp. [20]. HACEK IE has been associated with prolonged fever and delayed diagnosis, as compared with IE related to other pathogens [15]. In our study, early diagnosis, as defined by time to diagnosis <4 days after hospital admission, tended to be more common for IE related to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci, as compared with IE related to unusual microorganisms (47.7% vs 35.7%; P = .14).
Our study has limitations. First, as the study was performed in 1 country, during a single year, its findings may not be generalizable, given that the epidemiology of infectious diseases, including IE, may vary with time and geographical areas [21]. Second, due to the limited sample size, our study was not powered to describe rare causes of IE. In addition, the comparison of IE related to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci and unusual microorganisms could only be performed on a limited set of variables and probably missed significant risk factors. Third, unusual microorganisms responsible for IE were highly heterogeneous, merging IE cases classically associated with a protracted disease course, and good prognosis (eg, HACEK group or C. acnes IE) [4] with IE cases of dismal prognosis (eg, Enterobacteriaceae [17] or fungal IE [20]), which complicates the interpretation of our findings. Finally, as our cohort was restricted to definite IE according to modified Duke criteria, some cases of IE related to unusual microorganisms may have been missed, as blood culture criteria are more stringent for unusual microorganisms. However, this is, to our knowledge, the first population-based study on IE due to unusual microorganisms that has avoided the selection biases associated with studies originating from referral centers [22]. Our study provides original data on the characteristics of IE related to unusual microorganisms and risk factors.
In conclusion, we found that 9.8% of documented IE involves unusual microorganisms, with a predominance of strict anaerobes, yeast, and gram-negative bacilli. As compared with IE related to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci, IE related to unusual microorganisms is associated with previously known heart disease, prosthetic valve, nosocomial acquisition, and longer duration of fever.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
Financial support. This work was funded by a research grant from the French Ministry of Health and the support of the Société Française de Cardiologie, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Novartis France. The sponsor was the Hôpital Universitaire de Besançon. The study was supported by the following professional organizations: Association Pour l’enseignement de la Thérapeutique, Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française, Société Française de Microbiologie, Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne, Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, Société Française de Gérontologie, Société Française de Cardiologie, Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire, Société Française d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, and Fédération Française de Cardiologie.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: no reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
APPENDIX
AEPEI Study Group on Infective Endocarditis. Principal investigators: B. Hoen and X. Duval. Other members: F. Alla, A. Bouvet, S. Briançon, E. Cambau, M. Celard, C. Chirouze, N. Danchin, T. Doco-Lecompte, F. Delahaye, J. Etienne, B. Iung, V. Le Moing, J. F. Obadia, C. Leport, C. Poyart, M. Revest, C. Selton-Suty, C. Strady, P. Tattevin, and F. Vandenesch. Coordinating investigators in the study regions: Y. Bernard, S. Chocron, C. Chirouze, B. Hoen, P. Plesiat, I. Abouliatim, C. De Place, P. Tattevin, M. Revest, P. Y. Donnio, F. Alla, J. P. Carteaux, T. Doco-Lecompte, C. Lion, N. Aissa, C. Selton-Suty, B. Baehrel, R. Jaussaud, P. Nazeyrollas, C. Strady, V. Vernet, E. Cambau, X. Duval, B. Iung, P. Nataf, C. Chidiac, M. Celard, F. Delahaye, J. F. Obadia, F. Vandenesch, H. Aumaître, J. M. Frappier, V. Le Moing, E. Oziol, A. Sotto, and C. Sportouch. Centre National de Référence des Streptocoques: C. Poyart and A. Bouvet. Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques: F. Vandenesch. M. Celard, and M. Bes. Investigators: P. Abassade, E. Abrial, C. Acar, N. Aissa, J. F. Alexandra, N. Amireche, D. Amrein, P. Andre, M. Appriou, M. A. Arnould, P. Assayag, A. Atoui, F. Aziza, N. Baille, N. Bajolle, P. Battistella, S. Baumard, A. Ben Ali, J. Bertrand, S. Bialek, M. Bois Grosse, M. Boixados, F. Borlot, A. Bouchachi, O. Bouche, S. Bouchemal, J. L. Bourdon, A. Bouvet, L. Brasme, F. Bricaire, E. Brochet, J. F. Bruntz, A. Cady, J. Cailhol, M. P. Caplan, B. Carette, J. P. Carteaux, O. Cartry, C. Cazorla, M. Celard, H. Chamagne, H. Champagne, G. Chanques, J. Chastre, B. Chevalier, C. Chirouze, F. Chometon, C. Christophe, A. Cohen, N. Colin de Verdiere, N. Danchin, V. Daneluzzi, L. David, P. De Lentdecker, F. Delahaye, V. Delcey, P. Deleuze, E. Donal, X. Duval, B. Deroure, V. Descotes-Genon, K. Didier Petit, A. Dinh, V. Doat, F. Duchene, F. Duhoux, M. Dupont, S. Ederhy, O. Epaulard, M. Evest, J. F. Faucher, B. Fantin, E. Fauveau, T. Ferry, M. Fillod, T. Floch, T. Fraisse, J. M. Frapier, L. Freysz, B. Fumery, B. Gachot, S. Gallien, I. Gandjbach, P. Garcon, A. Gaubert, J. L. Genoud, S. Ghiglione, C. Godreuil, A. Grentzinger, L. Groben, D. Gherissi, P. Guéret, A. Hagege, N. Hammoudi, F. Heliot, P. Henry, S. Herson, B. Hoen, P. Houriez, L. Hustache-Mathieu, O. Huttin, S. Imbert, B. Iung, S. Jaureguiberry, M. Kaaki, A. Konate, J. M. Kuhn, S. Kural Menasche, A. Lafitte, B. Lafon, F. Lanternier, V. Le Chenault, V. Le Moing, C. Lechiche, S. Lefèvre-Thibaut, A. Lefort, A. Leguerrier, J. Lemoine, L. Lepage, C. Leport, C. Lepousé, J. Leroy, P. Lesprit, L. Letranchant, D. Loisance, G. Loncar, C. Lorentz, P. Mabo, I. Magnin-Poull, T. May, A. Makinson, H. Man, M. Mansouri, O. Marcxon, J. P. Maroni, V. Masse, F. Maurier, M. C. Meyohas, P. L. Michel, C. Michelet, F. Mechaï, O. Merceron, D. Messika-Zeitoun, Z. Metref, V. Meyssonnier, C. Mezher, S. Micheli, M. Monsigny, S. Mouly, B. Mourvillier, O. Nallet, P. Nataf, P. Nazeyrollas, V. Noel, J. F. Obadia, E. Oziol, T. Papo, B. Payet, A. Pelletier, P. Perez, J. S. Petit, F. Philippart, E. Piet, C. Plainvert, B. Popovic, J. M. Porte, P. Pradier, R. Ramadan, M. Revest, J. Richemond, M. Rodermann, M. Roncato, I. Roigt, O. Ruyer, M. Saada, J. Schwartz, C. Selton-Suty, M. Simon, B. Simorre, S. Skalli, F. Spatz, C. Strady, J. Sudrial, L. Tartiere, A. Terrier De La Chaise, M. C. Thiercelin, D. Thomas, M. Thomas, L. Toko, F. Tournoux, A. Tristan, J. L. Trouillet, L. Tual, A. Vahanian, F. Verdier, V. Vernet Garnier, V. Vidal, P. Weyne, M. Wolff, A. Wynckel, N. Zannad, and P. Y. Zinzius.
Contributor Information
for the EI 2008 de l’AEPEI working group:
B Hoen, X Duval, F Alla, A Bouvet, S Briançon, E Cambau, M Celard, C Chirouze, N Danchin, T Doco-Lecompte, F Delahaye, J Etienne, B Iung, V Le Moing, J F Obadia, C Leport, C Poyart, M Revest, C Selton-Suty, C Strady, P Tattevin, F Vandenesch, Y Bernard, S Chocron, C Chirouze, B Hoen, P Plesiat, I Abouliatim, C De Place, P Tattevin, M Revest, P Y Donnio, F Alla, J P Carteaux, T Doco-Lecompte, C Lion, N Aissa, C Selton-Suty, B Baehrel, R Jaussaud, P Nazeyrollas, C Strady, V Vernet, E Cambau, X Duval, B Iung, P Nataf, C Chidiac, M Celard, F Delahaye, J F Obadia, F Vandenesch, H Aumaître, J M Frappier, V Le Moing, E Oziol, A Sotto, C Sportouch, C Poyart, A Bouvet, F Vandenesch, M Celard, M Bes, P Abassade, E Abrial, C Acar, N Aissa, J F Alexandra, N Amireche, D Amrein, P Andre, M Appriou, M A Arnould, P Assayag, A Atoui, F Aziza, N Baille, N Bajolle, P Battistella, S Baumard, A Ben Ali, J Bertrand, S Bialek, M Bois Grosse, M Boixados, F Borlot, A Bouchachi, O Bouche, S Bouchemal, J L Bourdon, A Bouvet, L Brasme, F Bricaire, E Brochet, J F Bruntz, A Cady, J Cailhol, M P Caplan, B Carette, J P Carteaux, O Cartry, C Cazorla, M Celard, H Chamagne, H Champagne, G Chanques, J Chastre, B Chevalier, C Chirouze, F Chometon, C Christophe, A Cohen, N Colin de Verdiere, N Danchin, V Daneluzzi, L David, P De Lentdecker, F Delahaye, V Delcey, P Deleuze, E Donal, X Duval, B Deroure, V Descotes-Genon, K Didier Petit, A Dinh, V Doat, F Duchene, F Duhoux, M Dupont, S Ederhy, O Epaulard, M Evest, J F Faucher, B Fantin, E Fauveau, T Ferry, M Fillod, T Floch, T Fraisse, J M Frapier, L Freysz, B Fumery, B Gachot, S Gallien, I Gandjbach, P Garcon, A Gaubert, J L Genoud, S Ghiglione, C Godreuil, A Grentzinger, L Groben, D Gherissi, P Guéret, A Hagege, N Hammoudi, F Heliot, P Henry, S Herson, B Hoen, P Houriez, L Hustache-Mathieu, O Huttin, S Imbert, B Iung, S Jaureguiberry, M Kaaki, A Konate, J M Kuhn, S Kural Menasche, A Lafitte, B Lafon, F Lanternier, V Le Chenault, V Le Moing, C Lechiche, S Lefèvre-Thibaut, A Lefort, A Leguerrier, J Lemoine, L Lepage, C Leport, C Lepousé, J Leroy, P Lesprit, L Letranchant, D Loisance, G Loncar, C Lorentz, P Mabo, I Magnin-Poull, T May, A Makinson, H Man, M Mansouri, O Marcxon, J P Maroni, V Masse, F Maurier, M C Meyohas, P L Michel, C Michelet, F Mechaï, O Merceron, D Messika-Zeitoun, Z Metref, V Meyssonnier, C Mezher, S Micheli, M Monsigny, S Mouly, B Mourvillier, O Nallet, P Nataf, P Nazeyrollas, V Noel, J F Obadia, E Oziol, T Papo, B Payet, A Pelletier, P Perez, J S Petit, F Philippart, E Piet, C Plainvert, B Popovic, J M Porte, P Pradier, R Ramadan, M Revest, J Richemond, M Rodermann, M Roncato, I Roigt, O Ruyer, M Saada, J Schwartz, C Selton-Suty, M Simon, B Simorre, S Skalli, F Spatz, C Strady, J Sudrial, L Tartiere, A Terrier De La Chaise, M C Thiercelin, D Thomas, M Thomas, L Toko, F Tournoux, A Tristan, J L Trouillet, L Tual, A Vahanian, F Verdier, V Vernet Garnier, V Vidal, P Weyne, M Wolff, A Wynckel, N Zannad, and P Y Zinzius
References
- 1. Duval X, Delahaye F, Alla F, et al. AEPEI Study Group Temporal trends in infective endocarditis in the context of prophylaxis guideline modifications: three successive population-based surveys. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:1968–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, et al. International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:463–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): the task force on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer. Eur Heart J 2009; 30:2369–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Berbari EF, Cockerill FR 3rd, Steckelberg JM. Infective endocarditis due to unusual or fastidious microorganisms. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 72:532–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brouqui P, Raoult D. Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14:177–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Selton-Suty C, Célard M, Le Moing V, et al. AEPEI Study Group Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in infective endocarditis: a 1-year population-based survey. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54:1230–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:633–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tattevin P, Watt G, Revest M, et al. Update on blood culture-negative endocarditis. Med Mal Infect 2015; 45:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fournier PE, Gouriet F, Casalta JP, et al. Blood culture-negative endocarditis: improving the diagnostic yield using new diagnostic tools. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e8392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fournier PE, Thuny F, Richet H, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic strategy for blood culture-negative endocarditis: a prospective study of 819 new cases. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:131–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Houpikian P, Raoult D. Blood culture-negative endocarditis in a reference center: etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2005; 84:162–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kestler M, Muñoz P, Marín M, et al. Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis (GAMES) Endocarditis caused by anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobe 2017; 47:33–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Banzon JM, Rehm SJ, Gordon SM, et al. Propionibacterium acnes endocarditis: a case series. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23:396–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Revest M, Egmann G, Cattoir V, Tattevin P. HACEK endocarditis: state-of-the-art. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2016; 14:523–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chambers ST, Murdoch D, Morris A, et al. International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study Investigators HACEK infective endocarditis: characteristics and outcomes from a large, multi-national cohort. PLoS One 2013; 8:e63181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Morpeth S, Murdoch D, Cabell CH, et al. International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators Non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:829–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shrestha NK, Ledtke CS, Wang H, et al. Heart valve culture and sequencing to identify the infective endocarditis pathogen in surgically treated patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99:33–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Weinstein MP. Emerging data indicating that extended incubation of blood cultures has little clinical value. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1681–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tattevin P, Revest M, Lefort A, et al. Fungal endocarditis: current challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2014; 44:290–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Watt G, Lacroix A, Pachirat O, et al. Prospective comparison of infective endocarditis in Khon Kaen, Thailand and Rennes, France. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 92:871–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS, Cabell CH, et al. Revisiting the effect of referral bias on the clinical spectrum of infective endocarditis in adults. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 29:1203–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.