Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 13;133(11):e663–e664. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.057

SARS-CoV-2 Induces Acute and Refractory Relapse of Systemic Capillary Leak Syndrome (Clarkson's Disease)

Marc Pineton de Chambrun a,b,c,, Fleur Cohen-Aubart b, Dirk W Donker a, Pierre-Louis Cariou b, Charles-Edouard Luyt a,c, Alain Combes a,c, Zahir Amoura b
PMCID: PMC7217792  PMID: 32405072

To the Editor:

The systemic capillary-leak syndrome (SCLS), also known as Clarkson's disease, is a rare condition characterized by recurrent episodes of capillary hyperpermeability in the context of a monoclonal gammopathy.1 We have previously shown that prophylactic treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) significantly reduces relapse and improves survival.2 , 3 SCLS episodes are thought to have an infectious trigger, especially mediated by viruses, and a flu-like viral syndrome was reported in more than half of the episodes in a large cohort of Clarkson's disease flares.4

A 45-year-old woman with a 7-year history of immunoglobulin G Kappa monoclonal gammopathy-associated SCLS was recently admitted to our hospital for a planned immunoglobulin infusion. She regularly received IVIg since her diagnosis of Clarkson's disease at an initial dosage of 2 g/kg, with progressive tapering to 0.5 g/kg of body weight monthly. This preventive treatment protected her from having any relapse. When she was admitted in March 2020, she complained about nausea and vomiting and a 10-kg increase of body weight. She had no fever or any respiratory symptoms, but she had hypotension (80/40 mm Hg) with elevated heart rate (110 beats per minute). Laboratory findings were typical for an acute episode (hemoglobin 19.1 g/dL, proteinemia: 42 g/L). Evolution was unfavorable, with severe hypovolemic shock, multiple organ failure, and 4-limb compartment syndrome cumulating into refractory cardiac arrest. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction turned out to be positive, as sampled by tracheal aspiration.

The pathophysiology of SCLS is unknown. Whether the monoclonal component contributes to the pathogenesis of the disease and the mode of action of IVIg remains elusive. Still, the role of viruses as a trigger for acute relapses of the disease has repeatedly been described, as holds particularly for the influenza virus. SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus that spread in early 2020 from the region of Wuhan in China, is characterized mainly by a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.5 In this patient, the viral infection, although poorly symptomatic, can be considered as the trigger of the relapse.

We believe that this report contributes to our mechanistic understanding of several urgent considerations. Firstly, our patient died from a severe episode triggered by a SARS-CoV-2 infection without demonstrating any signs of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondly, she did not experience any acute relapse during the previous 7 years while under preventive treatment with IVIg, yet she died after being infected with this new pandemic virus. Obviously, IVIg preparations contain virus-specific immunoglobulins that may protect patients with Clarkson's disease against seasonal viral infections. Yet, in the setting of this new pandemic virus, the protection generally granted by IVIg may vanish because of the lack of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulins in available preparations. Thirdly, conversely, an additional aspect of the immunoglobulin treatment in our patient might have been insufficient to prevent such a virulent virus, that is, the individual dosage. Therefore, an intensified IVIg treatment using increased dosages in all Clarkson's disease patients (2 g/kg monthly) should be considered, at least during the beginning of the pandemic. Lastly, SCLS patients should be considered at very high risk for an acute relapse while facing this new coronavirus, and maximal isolation should imperatively be advocated.

Footnotes

Funding: None.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Clarkson B, Thompson D, Horwith M, Luckey EH. Cyclical edema and shock due to increased capillary permeability. Am J Med. 1960;29(2):193–216. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(60)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pineton de Chambrun M, Gousseff M, Mauhin W. Intravenous immunoglobulins improve survival in monoclonal gammopathy-associated systemic capillary-leak syndrome. Am J Med. 2017;130(10) doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.023. 1219.e19–1219.e27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gousseff M, Arnaud L, Lambert M. The systemic capillary leak syndrome: a case series of 28 patients from a European registry. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(7):464–471. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pineton de Chambrun M, Luyt C-E, Beloncle F. The clinical picture of severe systemic capillary-leak syndrome episodes requiring ICU admission. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(7):1216–1223. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES