Abstract
Background: Hypertension (HT) is a serious noncommunicable disease that can lead to several health problems when it is not detected or is not properly diagnosed and treated in a timely manner, particularly in individuals living in poor economic and education conditions. The hill tribe population in northern Thailand is a vulnerable population with limited information available regarding HT. Methods: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of HT and to determine the factors associated with HT among individuals from hill tribes aged 35 years and over and living in northern Thailand. A cross-sectional study was conducted to gather essential information from six main hill tribe groups: the Akha, Lahu, Karen, Hmong, Yao and Lisu tribes in Chiang Rai Province. A simple random method was used to select 30 hill tribe villages (5 villages for each tribe). People aged 35 years and over who lived in the selected villages were invited to participate in the study. A validated questionnaire and a 5-mL blood specimen were used as research instruments. A face-to-face interview was conducted to collect data after informed consent was obtained, and 5-mL blood specimens were drawn to determine the lipid profiles of the participants. Logistic regression was performed to determine the factors associated with HT at the significance level of α = 0.05. Results: A total of 1,287 participants were recruited into the study: 60.5% were females, 30.4% were aged 35-44 years, 65.4% were illiterate, and 83.1% were married. The overall prevalence of HT was 24.3%, and the Yao tribe had the highest prevalence at 18.5%. In the multivariable analysis, three variables were found to be associated with HT: marital status, ability to read Thai, and exercise behavior. Those who were single and divorced had a 2.55 (95% CI = 1.23-5.06) and 2.69 times greater chance (95% CI = 1.10-6.59), respectively, of developing HT than those who were married. Those who could not read Thai had a 2.13 times greater chance (95% CI = 1.50-3.01) of developing HT than those who could read, and those who did not exercise and who exercised sometimes had a 1.96 (95% CI = 1.07-3.58) and 2.24 times greater chance (95% CI = 1.21-4.13), respectively, of developing HT than those who regularly exercised. Conclusion: A health screening program for the identification of new HT among the hill tribe population urgently needs to be implemented, followed by the introduction of a proper exercise program to reduce the risk of HT, particularly for those who are illiterate and for single or divorced people.
Keywords: Hypertension, hill tribe, associated factor, prevalence, noncommunicable disease
Introduction
Hypertension (HT) or high blood pressure is a serious medical condition that can lead to other severe complications, such as heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and kidney disease [1]. HT has been recognized as a major cause of premature death worldwide [1]. Moreover, the reduction of noncommunicable diseases is an urgent global agenda that has been commonly raised and discussed among the global health professional community [2]. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 1.13 billion people suffered from HT globally, and two-thirds lived in low- and middle-income countries [3]. The WHO also reported that males (25.0%) were at greater risk for HT than females (20.0%) and that 25.0% of individuals with HT could not control their blood pressure after treatment, particularly those people aged 35 years and over.
In 2018, approximately 23 million people (prevalence of 24.7%) were reported to suffer from HT in Thailand, and more than half did not know their HT status [4]. In 2019, more than 6 million individuals with HT were registered for treatment nationally, with the total cost of all medical expenses required being 48,000 million baht per year [5]. Many factors are known to cause HT in different populations, such as high-salt diets [6], stress [7], and low physical activity [8]. Regarding public health screening programs conducted for people with no symptoms living in the community, very few people in Thailand had HT that was detected, diagnosed early and treated properly, particularly among those who were from poor families and living in remote areas [9]. Persons who are at risk for HT are not only those with high socioeconomic status but also those with poor economic and education status [10,11], including the hill tribe people living in northern Thailand [12].
The hill tribe people have migrated from south China into the northern region of Thailand over the course of the century [13,14]. There are six main groups: Akha, Lahu, Hmong, Yao, Karen, and Lisu [15]. In 2018, there were approximately 3.5-4 million hill tribe people living in Thailand [16]. The hill tribe people have their own languages, cultures, beliefs and lifestyle, particularly regarding daily cooking styles and preferred flavorings. Moreover, they are now living under mobilization and globalization situations, meaning that they are exposed to people outside their villages for work or other purposes. As a result of several conditions related to changes in lifestyle, including mainstream advertisements from different food and beverage companies through various channels, such as television, Facebook, and other media, hill tribe people have become vulnerable to and suffer from HT. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of HT and to determine factors associated with HT among the hill tribe population aged 35 years and older living in Thailand. These findings could be used for policy and public health intervention development in the future to address HT among the hill tribe people in Thailand.
Material and methods
Study design
A cross-sectional study design was applied to collect data from the participants between April 2019 and August 2019.
Study setting
The study settings were randomly selected from the lists of the six main hill tribe villages in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand: Akha, Lahu, Hmong, Yao, Karen, and Lisu [16]. In total, 30 villages (5 villages for each tribe) were selected from 15 districts: Muang, Mae Suai, Wiang Chai, Doi Luang, Wiang Pa Pao, Mae Fah Luang, Chiang Saen, Waeng Kaen, Chiang Khong, Phan, Thoeng, Khun Tant, Mae Chan, Wiang Chiang Rung, and Pha Ya Meng Rai districts.
Study population
All the hill tribe people who were living in the selected villages at the time of data collection and were 35 years of age and over comprised the study population. Those who were unable to provide essential information related to the study protocols were excluded from the study.
Study sample
The study sample was calculated based on the standard formula for a cross-sectional study design [17]. Based on Z = 1.96, P = 0.15 [4], Q = 0.85, and e = 0.05, at total of 1,106 samples were required. Allowing for 10% error throughout the study process, 1,228 individuals were needed for the analysis.
Research instruments and measurements
A questionnaire was developed based on the information found in a review of the literature; the questionnaire consisted of four (4) parts. In part one, 9 questions were used to collect the general information of the participants. In part two, 12 questions were used to collect information regarding the health behaviors of the participants. In part three, 20 questions were used to collect information on the participants’ knowledge of and attitudes toward HT prevention and control. In part four, 8 items involved laboratory results.
Stress was assessed by the standard form developed by the Department of Mental Health, Thailand. This form includes five questions answered on a 4-point ranking scale (0-3), with a total possible score of 20 [18]. Those who scored from 0 to 4 were defined as having low stress, those who scored from 5 to 9 were defined as having moderate stress, and those scored from 10 or more were defined as having high and severe stress. Body mass index (BMI) was classified into three categories: ≤18.5 kg/m2 was underweight, 18.51-22.99 kg/m2 was normal, and ≥23 kg/m2 was overweight. Lipid profiles were detected for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) was one biomarker detected in the laboratory.
HT was defined according to the classification of the American College of Cardiology as diastolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg, systolic blood pressure ≤140 mmHg or both [19]. Blood pressure was measured three times in all participants at the 0-, 10-, and 15-minute points of the test.
The questionnaire’s validity and reliability were improved before its use by item objective congruence (IOC) analysis and a pilot test. The IOC analysis aimed to assess the validity of the questionnaire by three experts in the field: a medical doctor, a public health expert, and an epidemiologist. Questions with scores less than 0.5 were excluded, those with scores of 0.5-0.69 were revised, and those with scores greater than 0.7 were defined as acceptable to use.
A pilot test was conducted to assess the feasibility and order of the questions for examining similar characteristics among the 15 tribes of the study population who were living in two hill tribe villages in Mae Chan District, Chiang Rai Province. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.71 for part 3, knowledge of and attitudes toward HT prevention and control.
Data collection procedure
Permission to enter the villages was granted by the district officers. Afterward, all targeted village headmen were contacted and provided complete information about the study. The individuals in the study population who met the inclusion criteria were given essential information regarding the study protocols and procedures 5 days prior to data collection. An informed consent form was obtained from the individuals before data collection and blood specimen collection. Specimens were transferred to the Mae Fah Laung Medical Laboratory Center on the same day for laboratory analysis to identify biomarkers.
Data analysis
Data were double-entered into an Excel sheet before being transferred into the SPSS program (Version 24, Chicago, IL), which was used for the analysis. Both categorical and continuous data were properly analyzed to describe the characteristics of the participants. Logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with HT among the participants with a significance level of α = 0.05.
Ethical considerations
The complete study proposal and its protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Mae Fah Luang University (No. REH-61009).
Results
A total of 1,287 participants were recruited for the analysis. More than half of the participants were female (60.5%) and were married (83.1%). The average age was 52.2 years, and the proportion of participants among the different tribes was mostly the same (15.5-20.6%). A large proportion of the participants were Buddhist (52.8%) and illiterate (65.4%), but less than one-fifth were not employed (18.7%), and the median income level was 30,000 baht per year per family. Most participants were able to speak (57.9%) and understand (55.0%) Thai; however, three-fourths could not read (60.8%) or write (51.5%) Thai.
Less than half of the participants had been examined to determine their HT status in the previous year (45.5%). Only 6.1% and 9.8% knew the HT status of their father and mother, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics | n | % |
---|---|---|
Total | 1,287 | 100.0 |
Sex | ||
Male | 508 | 39.5 |
Female | 779 | 60.5 |
Age (years) | ||
35-44 | 391 | 30.4 |
45-54 | 360 | 28.0 |
55-64 | 336 | 26.1 |
65-74 | 152 | 11.8 |
≥75 | 48 | 3.7 |
Mean = 52.2, SD = 11.6, Min. = 35, Max. = 90 | ||
Tribe | ||
Akha | 265 | 20.6 |
Lahu | 212 | 16.5 |
Hmong | 202 | 15.7 |
Yao | 200 | 15.5 |
Karen | 208 | 16.2 |
Lisu | 200 | 15.5 |
Religion | ||
Buddhist | 679 | 52.8 |
Christian | 608 | 47.2 |
Education | ||
Illiterate | 842 | 65.4 |
Primary school | 267 | 20.7 |
Secondary to high school | 151 | 11.7 |
University degree | 27 | 2.2 |
Occupation | ||
Unemployed | 241 | 18.7 |
Agriculturalist | 659 | 51.2 |
Other | 387 | 30.1 |
Annual income (baht) | ||
≤40,000 | 897 | 69.7 |
40,001-79,999 | 239 | 18.6 |
≥80,000 | 151 | 11.7 |
Marital status | ||
Single | 54 | 4.2 |
Married | 1,070 | 83.1 |
Divorced | 26 | 2.1 |
Widowed | 137 | 10.6 |
Ability to understand Thai | ||
Little | 542 | 42.1 |
Yes | 745 | 57.9 |
Ability to speak Thai | ||
Little | 579 | 45.0 |
Yes | 708 | 55.0 |
Ability to read Thai | ||
No | 782 | 60.8 |
Little | 134 | 10.4 |
Yes | 371 | 28.8 |
Ability to write Thai | ||
No | 791 | 61.5 |
Little | 148 | 11.5 |
Yes | 348 | 27.0 |
Blood pressure examined in prior year | ||
No | 701 | 54.5 |
Yes | 586 | 45.5 |
Knowledge of father’s HT history | ||
No | 1,208 | 93.9 |
Yes | 79 | 6.1 |
Knowledge of mother’s HT history | ||
No | 1,161 | 90.2 |
Yes | 126 | 9.8 |
More than half of the participants (69.6%) had high LDL, 43.8% had high total cholesterol, 40.7% had high triglycerides, and 12.3% had an abnormal level of HbA1c (Table 2).
Table 2.
Biomarkers | n | % |
---|---|---|
Triglycerides (mg/dL) | ||
Normal (≤149) | 763 | 59.3 |
High (≥150) | 524 | 40.7 |
HDL (mg/dL) | ||
Low (<40) | 702 | 54.5 |
Normal (≥40) | 585 | 45.5 |
LDL (mg/dL) | ||
Normal (<100) | 391 | 30.4 |
High (≥100) | 896 | 69.6 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | ||
Normal (≤199) | 723 | 56.2 |
High (≥200) | 564 | 43.8 |
HbA1c (mg%) | ||
Normal (<6.0%) | 1129 | 87.7 |
Prediabetes (6.0-6.4%) | 64 | 5.0 |
Diabetes (≥6.5%) | 94 | 7.3 |
BMI (kg/m2) | ||
Underweight (≤18.5) | 73 | 5.7 |
Normal (18.5-22.9) | 393 | 30.5 |
Overweight (≥23.0) | 821 | 63.8 |
Regarding the health behaviors of the participants, 22.8% had quit or were current smokers, 29.6% had ever used or currently used alcohol, and 51.9% did not exercise. Approximately one-third of the participants used a high volume of salt (35.2%), monosodium glutamate (43.1%), and oil (30.1%) for cooking.
A large proportion of the participants had low knowledge (70.8%) and poor attitudes (86.3%) regarding HT prevention and control (Table 3).
Table 3.
Health behaviors | n | % |
---|---|---|
Smoking | ||
No | 993 | 77.2 |
Quit | 178 | 13.8 |
Yes | 116 | 9.0 |
Alcohol use | ||
No | 906 | 70.4 |
Quit | 258 | 20.0 |
Yes | 123 | 9.6 |
Exercise | ||
No | 668 | 51.9 |
Sometimes | 521 | 40.5 |
Regularly | 98 | 7.6 |
Salt use for cooking | ||
A lot | 452 | 35.2 |
Moderate | 727 | 56.5 |
Little | 108 | 8.3 |
Monosodium glutamate use for cooking | ||
A lot | 554 | 43.1 |
Moderate | 681 | 52.9 |
Little | 52 | 4.0 |
Oil use for cooking | ||
A lot | 387 | 30.1 |
Moderate | 703 | 54.6 |
Little | 197 | 15.3 |
Stress (ST-5) | ||
Low | 1,012 | 78.6 |
Moderate | 222 | 17.2 |
High and severe | 53 | 4.2 |
Knowledge of HT prevention and control | ||
Low | 911 | 70.8 |
Moderate | 226 | 17.6 |
High | 150 | 11.6 |
Attitudes toward HT prevention and control | ||
Poor | 1,111 | 86.3 |
Moderate | 146 | 11.3 |
High | 30 | 2.4 |
The overall prevalence of HT among the participants was 24.3%: 29.0% in the Yao tribe, 26.2% in the Hmong tribe, 25.2% in the Lisu tribe, 25.0% in the Lahu tribe, and 22.1% in the Karen tribe. Among the participants with HT, 21.2% were detected as new cases or incident cases that had never previously known their HT status. Of those who were being treated for HT control, 35.3% had uncontrolled blood pressure. There was some difference in HT prevalence according to sex: the prevalence was 25.8% in males and 23.4% in females. However, the HT prevalences according to different age categories were mostly the same (range = 22.2-25.7%).
In the univariate model, seven variables were found to be associated with HT among the participants: marital status, ability to read Thai, ability to write Thai, alcohol use, exercise, the volume of monosodium glutamate used for cooking, and the volume of oil used for cooking.
In the multivariate model, only three variables remained associated with HT: marital status, ability to read Thai, and exercise. Participants who were single and divorced had a 2.55 (95% CI = 1.23-5.06) and 2.69 times (95% CI = 1.10-6.59) greater chance, respectively, of developing HT than those who were married. Those who could not read Thai had a 2.13 times (95% CI = 1.51-3.01) greater chance of developing HT than those who could, and those who did not exercise and exercised sometimes had a 1.96 (95% CI = 1.07-3.58) and 2.24 times (95% CI = 1.21-4.13), greater chance, respectively of developing HT compared with those who exercised regularly (Table 4).
Table 4.
Factors | HT | OR | 95% CI | p-value | ORadj | 95% CI | p-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Yes | No | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
n | % | n | % | |||||||
Total | 313 | 24.3 | 974 | 75.7 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Sex | ||||||||||
Male | 131 | 25.8 | 377 | 74.2 | 1.14 | 0.88-1.45 | 0.322 | |||
Female | 182 | 23.4 | 597 | 76.6 | 1.00 | |||||
Age (years) | ||||||||||
35-44 | 98 | 25.1 | 293 | 74.9 | 1.00 | |||||
45-54 | 80 | 22.2 | 280 | 77.8 | 0.85 | 0.61-1.20 | 0.360 | |||
55-64 | 84 | 25.0 | 252 | 75.0 | 1.00 | 0.71-1.40 | 0.984 | |||
65-74 | 39 | 25.7 | 113 | 74.3 | 1.03 | 0.67-1.59 | 0.886 | |||
≥75 | 12 | 25.0 | 36 | 75.0 | 1.00 | 0.50-2.00 | 0.992 | |||
Religion | ||||||||||
Buddhist | 172 | 25.3 | 507 | 74.7 | 0.89 | 0.69-1.15 | 0.372 | |||
Christian and Muslim | 141 | 23.2 | 467 | 76.8 | 1.00 | |||||
Tribe | ||||||||||
Akha | 52 | 19.6 | 213 | 80.4 | 0.71 | 0.46-1.11 | 0.132 | |||
Lahu | 53 | 25.0 | 159 | 75.0 | 0.94 | 0.62-1.52 | 0.907 | |||
Hmong | 53 | 26.2 | 149 | 73.8 | 1.04 | 0.67-1.62 | 0.866 | |||
Yao | 58 | 29.0 | 142 | 71.0 | 1.20 | 0.77-1.86 | 0.432 | |||
Karen | 46 | 22.1 | 162 | 77.9 | 0.83 | 0.53-1.31 | 0.422 | |||
Lisu | 51 | 25.5 | 149 | 74.5 | 1.00 | |||||
Education | ||||||||||
No education | 232 | 27.6 | 610 | 72.4 | 1.08 | 0.45-2.60 | 0.852 | |||
Primary school | 51 | 19.1 | 216 | 80.9 | 0.68 | 0.27-1.68 | 0.398 | |||
Secondary to high school | 23 | 15.2 | 128 | 84.8 | 0.51 | 0.20-1.35 | 0.177 | |||
University degree | 16 | 25.9 | 20 | 74.1 | 1.00 | |||||
Occupation | ||||||||||
Unemployed | 65 | 27.0 | 176 | 73.0 | 1.00 | |||||
Agriculturalist | 168 | 25.5 | 491 | 74.5 | 1.41 | 0.97-2.06 | 0.069 | |||
Other | 80 | 20.7 | 307 | 79.3 | 1.31 | 0.97-1.78 | 0.077 | |||
Annual income (baht) | ||||||||||
≤40,000 | 218 | 24.5 | 679 | 75.5 | 1.24 | 0.81-1.90 | 0.314 | |||
40,001-79,999 | 64 | 26.8 | 175 | 73.2 | 1.42 | 0.87-2.31 | 0.162 | |||
≥80,000 | 31 | 20.5 | 120 | 79.5 | 1.00 | |||||
Marital status | ||||||||||
Single | 22 | 40.7 | 32 | 59.3 | 2.34 | 1.34-4.10 | 0.003* | 2.55 | 1.23-5.06 | 0.007* |
Widowed | 37 | 27.0 | 15 | 73.0 | 1.26 | 0.84-1.89 | 0.263 | 1.03 | 0.62-1.41 | 0.740 |
Divorced | 11 | 42.3 | 100 | 57.7 | 2.50 | 1.13-5.51 | 0.023* | 2.69 | 1.10-6.59 | 0.030* |
Married | 243 | 22.7 | 827 | 77.3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
Ability to understand Thai | ||||||||||
Little | 145 | 26.8 | 397 | 73.2 | 1.25 | 0.97-1.62 | 0.083 | |||
Yes | 168 | 22.6 | 577 | 77.4 | 1.00 | |||||
Ability to speak Thai | ||||||||||
Little | 153 | 26.4 | 426 | 73.6 | 1.23 | 0.95-159 | 0.112 | |||
Yes | 160 | 22.6 | 548 | 77.4 | 1.00 | |||||
Ability to read Thai | ||||||||||
No | 220 | 28.1 | 526 | 71.9 | 1.84 | 1.35-2.51 | <0.001* | 2.13 | 1.51-3.01 | <0.001* |
Little | 28 | 20.9 | 106 | 79.1 | 1.24 | 0.76-2.04 | 0.388 | 1.43 | 0.86-2.37 | 0.170 |
Yes | 65 | 17.5 | 306 | 82.5 | 1.00 | |||||
Ability to write Thai | ||||||||||
No | 217 | 27.4 | 574 | 72.6 | 168 | 1.23-2.29 | 0.001* | |||
Little | 32 | 21.6 | 116 | 78.4 | 1.22 | 0.76-1.97 | 0.405 | |||
Yes | 64 | 18.4 | 284 | 81.6 | 1.00 | |||||
Knowledge of father’s HT history | ||||||||||
No | 295 | 24.4 | 913 | 75.6 | 1.00 | |||||
Yes | 18 | 22.8 | 61 | 77.2 | 0.91 | 0.53-1.57 | 0.743 | |||
Knowledge of mother’s HT history | ||||||||||
No | 290 | 25.0 | 871 | 75.0 | 1.00 | |||||
Yes | 23 | 18.3 | 103 | 81.7 | 0.67 | 0.42-1.07 | 0.097 | |||
Triglycerides | ||||||||||
Normal | 173 | 22.4 | 550 | 77.6 | 1.00 | |||||
High | 140 | 27.1 | 424 | 72.9 | 1.29 | 1.00-1.66 | 0.054 | |||
HDL | ||||||||||
Low | 162 | 23.1 | 540 | 76.9 | 0.86 | 0.67-1.11 | 0.255 | |||
Normal | 151 | 25.8 | 434 | 74.2 | 1.00 | |||||
LDL | ||||||||||
Normal | 101 | 25.8 | 290 | 74.2 | 1.00 | |||||
High | 212 | 76.3 | 684 | 23.7 | 0.89 | 0.68-1.17 | 0.404 | |||
Total cholesterol | ||||||||||
Normal | 173 | 23.9 | 550 | 76.1 | 1.00 | |||||
High | 140 | 24.8 | 424 | 75.2 | 1.05 | 0.81-1.36 | 0.711 | |||
HbA1c | ||||||||||
Normal | 279 | 24.7 | 850 | 75.3 | 1.00 | |||||
Prediabetes | 10 | 15.6 | 54 | 84.4 | 0.56 | 0.28-1.12 | 0.103 | |||
Diabetes | 24 | 25.5 | 70 | 74.5 | 1.05 | 0.64-1.69 | 0.860 | |||
BMI | ||||||||||
Normal | 17 | 23.3 | 56 | 76.7 | 1.00 | |||||
Underweight | 84 | 21.4 | 309 | 78.6 | 1.12 | 0.62-2.02 | 0.716 | |||
Overweight | 212 | 25.8 | 609 | 74.2 | 1.28 | 0.96-1.71 | 0.092 | |||
Smoking | ||||||||||
No | 241 | 24.3 | 752 | 75.7 | 1.00 | |||||
Quit | 39 | 21.9 | 139 | 78.1 | 0.88 | 0.60-1.29 | 0.497 | |||
Yes | 33 | 28.4 | 83 | 71.6 | 1.24 | 0.81-1.91 | 0.324 | |||
Alcohol use | ||||||||||
No | 228 | 25.2 | 678 | 74.8 | 1.00 | |||||
Quit | 49 | 19.0 | 209 | 81.0 | 0.70 | 0.49-0.99 | 0.041* | |||
Yes | 36 | 29.3 | 87 | 70.7 | 1.23 | 0.81-1.87 | 0.329 | |||
Exercise | ||||||||||
No | 172 | 25.7 | 496 | 74.3 | 2.08 | 1.15-3.76 | 0.015* | 1.96 | 1.07-3.58 | 0.028* |
Sometimes | 127 | 24.4 | 394 | 75.6 | 1.93 | 1.06-3.52 | 0.031* | 2.24 | 1.21-4.13 | 0.010* |
Regular | 14 | 14.3 | 84 | 85.7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
Salt use for cooking | ||||||||||
A lot | 111 | 24.6 | 341 | 75.4 | 1.00 | |||||
Moderate | 180 | 24.8 | 547 | 75.2 | 1.01 | 0.77-1.33 | 0.938 | |||
Little | 22 | 20.4 | 86 | 79.6 | 0.79 | 0.47-1.32 | 0.359 | |||
Monosodium glutamate use for cooking | ||||||||||
A lot | 150 | 27.1 | 404 | 72.9 | 1.00 | |||||
Moderate | 156 | 22.9 | 525 | 77.1 | 0.80 | 0.62-1.03 | 0.092 | |||
Little | 7 | 13.5 | 45 | 86.5 | 0.42 | 0.19-0.95 | 0.037* | |||
Oil use for cooking | ||||||||||
A lot | 101 | 26.1 | 286 | 73.9 | 1.00 | |||||
Moderate | 177 | 25.2 | 526 | 74.8 | 0.95 | 0.72-1.27 | 0.739 | |||
Little | 35 | 17.8 | 162 | 82.2 | 0.61 | 0.40-0.94 | 0.025* | |||
Stress (ST-5) | ||||||||||
Low | 241 | 23.8 | 771 | 76.2 | 1.00 | |||||
Moderate | 54 | 24.3 | 168 | 75.7 | 1.03 | 0.73-1.44 | 0.872 | |||
High and severe | 18 | 34.0 | 35 | 66.0 | 1.65 | 0.92-2.96 | 0.096 | |||
Knowledge of HT prevention and control | ||||||||||
Low | 219 | 24.0 | 692 | 76.0 | 0.84 | 0.57-1.24 | 0.358 | |||
Moderate | 53 | 23.5 | 173 | 76.5 | 0.81 | 0.51-1.31 | 0.395 | |||
High | 41 | 27.3 | 109 | 72.7 | 1.00 | |||||
Attitudes toward HT prevention and control | ||||||||||
Low | 272 | 24.5 | 839 | 75.5 | 1.30 | 0.53-3.21 | 0.574 | |||
Moderate | 35 | 24.0 | 111 | 76.0 | 1.26 | 0.48-3.33 | 0.640 | |||
High | 6 | 20.0 | 24 | 80.0 | 1.00 |
Significant at α = 0.05.
Discussion
The prevalence of HT among hill tribe people aged 35 years and over was 23.4%, and higher proportions of HT were in some tribes than in other tribes, but the difference was not significant. Among the individuals with detected HT, 21.2% had never previously known their HT status, and 35.3% had uncontrolled blood pressure after treatment. Marital status, ability to read Thai, and exercise behavior were found to be associated with HT among the hill tribe populations. Individuals who were single or divorced were more likely to develop HT than those who were married. Participants who could not read Thai were more likely to develop HT than those who could, and those who did not exercise or exercised sometimes were more likely to develop HT than those who regularly exercised.
The Department of Disease Control, Thailand, reported that the overall prevalence of HT among the Thai population varies according to age categories and tends to increase with age [4]. The prevalence of HT among people aged 15 years and over is 24.7% [19]. However, among people aged 35 years and over, HT is more serious among the hill tribe population than among the general Thai population, with an average prevalence of 21.67% [20].
In our study, it was found that one-fifth of the study population did not know their HT status, and one-third had uncontrolled blood pressure after treatment. A study in Thailand [21] reported that 29.0% of people aged 15 years and over with HT who lived in the community were not diagnosed, which is greater than our findings for the hill tribe population. The difference in these two proportions might be due to the different ages of the study population (15 years and over versus 35 years and over).
Furthermore, Meelab et al. [22] reported that more than half (54.4%) of HT patients in Thailand could not control their blood pressure, which is greater than the proportion we found for the hill tribe population. However, this observation may be due to the large proportion of individuals with HT in the hill tribe population whose HT has not been detected and who are therefore not enrolled in a treatment process.
In our study, we also found that hill tribe people who could not use Thai fluently were more likely to develop HT than those who could read Thai. In the health care system and services in Thailand, including all messages delivered to patients, clients, and the general population, information is available only in the Thai language. Improvements in the health-related information provided to individuals could lead to improved personal attitudes and skills, especially in the prevention and control of public health problems such as HT. Without a doubt, under conditions of poor education, as is the case for the hill tribes, the understanding of essential information regarding HT prevention and control that is available in Thai only is severely limited; thus, these individuals become vulnerable to developing HT. This observation is consistent with those of several studies in different settings showing that the language used to deliver health messages and health education was a serious barrier to the improvement of many chronic noncommunicable diseases [14,23-25].
Marital status was indicated as a factor associated with HT in our study. Single and divorced individuals were more likely to develop HT than married individuals. A study conducted in Iran in 2019 [26] reported that among men, single men had a higher risk of developing HT than other groups; however, among women, married women had a higher risk of developing HT than other groups. A study in the United States [27] demonstrated that single women were at a higher risk of developing hypertension than other groups, but men who were married and men with a change in marital status had a higher risk of developing HT than other groups. In a study in Ghana [28], it was found that married women had a significantly greater risk of developing HT than other groups, while no association was found between marital status and HT development among men. The different associations between marital status and HT in different groups of people could be explained by the differences in culture and lifestyle in certain populations. In the hill tribes in Thailand, females do the majority of the cooking and preparation of food for family members [13,16,29,30], while those who are single or who are not in a relationship tend to consume food that is prepared outside of the family and are more likely to eat food from restaurants, where they cannot control the volumes of salt, monosodium glutamate and oil used, which may impact their health and HT status later.
Several intervention and observation studies have clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of exercise for reducing and preventing HT in different populations. A systematic meta-analysis [31] reported that aerobic exercise could significantly reduce both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as heart rate, among hypertensive patients. Lopes et al. [32] also reported that in the intervention group, exercise could reduce blood pressure and effectively help in the management of hypertension compared with the control group. Another systematic review [33] clearly showed that regular exercise could reduce blood pressure, particularly among individuals with chronic kidney disease.
There were some limitations throughout the study. First, the participants were asked about the volumes of salt, monosodium glutamate and oil used in their cooking. The answers provided might differ based on individual perception. Most people eat lunch from restaurants; thus, they cannot control the ingredients used. Second, some people could not clearly understand the questions, particularly those people aged 50 years and over. However, local translators who were fluent in both Thai and the local language were asked to help participants complete the questionnaire. Last, answers about the parental history of HT might not be accurate, particularly in participants older than 50 years, because in many cases, their parents had died, and no medical history was available.
Conclusion
The hill tribe people in Thailand live under poor education and economic conditions. Their understanding of health information released by health professionals is very limited due to their lack of proficiency in the Thai language, particularly in reading Thai. These conditions and the lack of understanding might make these individuals less empowered to improve their knowledge of and attitudes toward lifestyle behaviors that can protect themselves and their family from HT. Given their recent exposure to globalization and mobilization, the hill tribe people are becoming a new vulnerable population for HT, with a higher prevalence of HT among individuals aged 35 years and above than in the general Thai population of the same age. The unknown HT status of those living in the hill tribe community is a problem, and an effective public health screening program is urgently needed to identify these individuals and provide them with a proper prevention and treatment program. A treatment outcome monitoring program for those who are on medications is also critical for the reduction of disease complications.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the participants who provided us with essential information for the study. We also would like to thank the Health System Research Institute (HSRI), Thailand, and Mae Fah Luang University for their support grants.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Miller KS, Boyer CB, Cotton G. Centers for disease control and prevention. J Environ Health. 1997;59:16. [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization. A global brief on hypertension: silent killer, global public health crisis. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization. Hypertension: key facts. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Hypertension situation in Thailand. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Health Organization. Catalyzing multisectoral actions to reduce NCD risk factors: Thailand. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby LM, Ferrara G, Salama JS. Health effects of dietary risk in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393:1958–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Ferrie JE, Batty GD, Nyberg ST, Jokela M, Virtanen M, Alfredsson L, Dragano N, Fransson EI, Goldberg M, Knutsson A, Koskenvuo M, Koskinen A, Kouvonen A, Luukkonen R, Oksanen T, Rugulies R, Siegrist J, Singh-Manoux A, Suominen S, Theorell T, Väänänen A, Vahtera J, Westerholm PJM, Westerlund H, Zins M, Strandberg T, Steptoe A, Deanfield J IPD-Work consortium. Work stress and risk of death in men and women with and without cardiometabolic disease: a multicohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:705–713. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30140-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kiber M, Wube M, Temesgen H, Woyraw W, Belay YA. Prevalence of hypertension and its associated factors among adults in Debre Markos Town, northwest Ethiopia: community based cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:406. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4431-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Charoendee K, Sriratanaban J, Aekplakorn W, Hanvoravongchai P. Assessment of population coverage of hypertension screening in Thailand based on the effective coverage framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:208. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2996-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Armas Rojas N, Dobell E, Lacey B, Varona-Pérez P, Burrett JA, Lorenzo-Vázquez E, Calderón Martínez M, Sherliker P, Bess Constantén S, Morales Rigau JM, Hernández López OJ, Martínez Morales MÁ, Alonso Alomá I, Achiong Estupiñan F, Díaz González M, Rosquete Muñoz N, Cendra Asencio M, Peto R, Emberson J, Dueñas Herrera A, Lewington S. Burden of hypertension and associated risks for cardiovascular mortality in Cuba: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4:e107–e115. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30210-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Marcus ME, Ebert C, Zhumadilov Z, Wesseh CS, Tsabedze L, Supiyev A, Sturua L, Bahendeka SK, Sibai AM, Quesnel-Crooks S, Norov B, Mwangi KJ, Mwalim O, Wong-McClure R, Mayige MT, Martins JS, Lunet N, Labadarios D, Karki KB, Kagaruki GB, Jorgensen JMA, Hwalla NC, Houinato D, Houehanou C, Msaidié M, Guwatudde D, Gurung MS, Gathecha G, Dorobantu M, Damasceno A, Bovet P, Bicaba BW, Aryal KK, Andall-Brereton G, Agoudavi K, Stokes A, Davies JI, Bärnighausen T, Atun R, Vollmer S, Jaacks LM. The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries; a cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual level data from 1.1 million adults. Lancet. 2019;394:652–662. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30955-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rosengren A, Smyth A, Rangarajan S, Ramasundarahettige C, Bangdiwala SI, AlHabib KF, Avezum A, Bengtsson Boström K, Chifamba J, Gulec S, Gupta R, Igumbor EU, Iqbal R, Ismail N, Joseph P, Kaur M, Khatib R, Kruger IM, Lamelas P, Lanas F, Lear SA, Li W, Wang C, Quiang D, Wang Y, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Mohammadifard N, Mohan V, Mony PK, Poirier P, Srilatha S, Szuba A, Teo K, Wielgosz A, Yeates KE, Yusoff K, Yusuf R, Yusufali AH, Attaei MW, McKee M, Yusuf S. Socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in 20 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries; the prospective urban rural epidemiologic (PURE) study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e748–e760. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Apidechkul T. A 20-year retrospective cohort study of TB infection among the hill tribe HIV/AIDS populations, Thailand. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:72. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1407-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Apidechkul T, Laingoen O, Suwannaporn S. Inequity in accessing health care service in Thailand in 2015: a case study of the hill tribe people in Mae Fah Luang district, Chiang Rai, Thailand. J Health Res. 2016;30:67–71. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Apidechkul T. Epidemiology of the hill tribe HIV/AIDS populations, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99:702–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The hill tribe welfare and development center, Chiang rai province. Hill tribe population. The hill tribe welfare and development center. Chiang Rai: Ministry of Interior; 2018. pp. 15–22. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study design in medical research. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35:121–6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health. Stress-5. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 19.American College of Cardiology. Guideline for prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adult. 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roubsanthisuk W, Silaruks S, Ophascharoensuk V, Sirinak C, Phrommayon P. Hypertension in Thailand: a message from the Thai Hypertension Society on World Hypertension Day 2017. J Med Assoc Thai. 2018;101:705–6. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Annual report 2015. 2015 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meelab S, Bunupuradah I, Suttiruang J, Sakulrojanawong S, Thongkua N, Chatawiboonchai C, Chirabandhu P, Lertthanaporn S, Suwanthip K, Songsaengthum C, Keattisaksri B, Trakulsuk P, Pittapun A, Nata N, Rangsin R, Sakboonyarat B. Prevalence and associated factors of uncontrolled blood pressure among hypertensive patients in the rural communities in the central areas in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0212572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim EJ, Kim T, Passsche-Orlow MK, Rose AJ, Hanchate AD. Disparities in hypertension associated with limited English proficiency. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:632–639. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3999-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khatib R, Schwalm JD, Yusuf S, Haynes RB, McKee M, Khan M, Nieuwlaat R. Patient and healthcare provider barriers to hypertension awareness, treatment and follow up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of qualitative and quantitative studies. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gebrezgi MT, Trepka MJ, Kidane EA. Barriers to and facilitators of hypertension management in Asmara, Eritrea: patients’ perspective. J Health Popul Nutr. 2017;36:11. doi: 10.1186/s41043-017-0090-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ramezankhani A, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Association of marital status with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a long term follow up study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0215593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schwandt HM, Coresh J, Hindin MJ. Marital status, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and death among Africa American women and men: incidence and prevalence in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study participants. J Fam Issues. 2010;31:1211–29. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10365487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tuoyire DA, Ayetey H. Gender differences in the association between marital status and hypertension in Ghana. J Biosoc Sci. 2019;51:313–334. doi: 10.1017/S0021932018000147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Princess Maha Chakri Siridhorn Anthropology Center. Hill tribe. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chomchoei C, Apidechkul T, Khunthason S, Kullawong N, Keawdounglek V, Tamornpark R, Upala P, Yeedmard F, Wongfu C. Prevalence and factors associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus among middle-aged and elderly Lisu hill tribe people, northern Thailand: a cross-sectional study. J Health Sci Altern Med. 2019;1:17–23. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cao L, Li X, Yan P, Wang X, Li M, Li R, Shi X, Liu X, Yanf K. The effectiveness of aerobic exercise for hypertensive population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:868–76. doi: 10.1111/jch.13583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lopes S, Mesquita-Bastos J, Alves AJ, Ribeiro F. Exercise as a tool for hypertension and resistant hypertension management: current insights. Integr Blood Press Control. 2018;11:65–71. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S136028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thompson S, Wiebe N, Padwal RS, Gyenes G, Headley SA, Radhakrishnan J, Graham M. The effect of exercise on blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis for randomized controlled trails. PLoS One. 2018;14:e0211032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]