Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2018 Feb;159(2):342–350. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001102

Table 5.

Location Scale Models of Negative Affect as a function of Spouse Observed Pain Intensity, Pain Behavior, and Activity

DV: Negative Affect DV: Negative Affect DV: Negative Affect

B SE z p B SE z p B SE z p

Means
Intercept 10.34 .90 11.53 .000 Intercept 10.33 .92 11.23 .000 Intercept 10.40 1.00 10.45 .000
Time −.33 .04 −7.31 .000 Time −.33 .04 −7.32 .000 Time −.33 .04 −7.31 .000
Pain Intensity 4.48 .89 5.02 .000 Pain Behavior 3.88 .90 4.31 .000 Activity .61 1.01 .60 .548
  Between Variance
Intercept 4.43 .14 31.21 .000 Intercept 4.48 .14 31.60 .000 Intercept 4.64 .14 32.80 .000
  Within Variance
Intercept 3.48 .13 26.71 .000 Intercept 3.48 .13 26.29 .000 Intercept 3.48 .14 25.67 .000
Time −.25 .02 −12.05 .000 Time −.25 .02 −12.07 .000 Time −.25 .02 −12.12 .000
Pain Intensity .41 .13 3.12 .002 Pain Behavior .32 .13 2.47 .014 Activity .08 .14 .61 .540
Random Effects
Random Location (mean and variability) .85 .12 7.29 .000 Random Location .88 .12 7.49 .000 Random Location .94 .12 7.82 .000
Random Scale (remaining variability) 1.01 .07 13.78 .000 Random Scale 1.01 .07 13.78 .000 Random Scale 1.01 .07 13.78 .000

Note. DV indicates the dependent variable for the model.