Abstract
Objective
To investigate single muscle fiber contractile performance in muscle biopsies from patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), one of the most common hereditary muscle disorders.
Methods
We collected 50 muscle biopsies (26 vastus lateralis, 24 tibialis anterior) from 14 patients with genetically confirmed FSHD and 12 healthy controls. Single muscle fibers (n = 547) were isolated for contractile measurements. Titin content and titin phosphorylation were examined in vastus lateralis muscle biopsies.
Results
Single muscle fiber specific force was intact at saturating and physiologic calcium concentrations in all FSHD biopsies, with (FSHDFAT) and without (FSHDNORMAL) fatty infiltration, compared to healthy controls. Myofilament calcium sensitivity of force is increased in single muscle fibers obtained from FSHD muscle biopsies with increased fatty infiltration, but not in FSHD muscle biopsies without fatty infiltration (pCa50: 5.77–5.80 in healthy controls, 5.74–5.83 in FSHDNORMAL, and 5.86–5.90 in FSHDFAT single muscle fibers). Cross-bridge cycling kinetics at saturating calcium concentrations and myofilament cooperativity did not differ from healthy controls. Development of single muscle fiber passive tension was changed in all FSHD vastus lateralis and in FSHDFAT tibialis anterior, resulting in increased fiber stiffness. Titin content was increased in FSHD vastus lateralis biopsies; however, titin phosphorylation did not differ from healthy controls.
Conclusion
Muscle weakness in patients with FSHD is not caused by reduced specific force of individual muscle fibers, even in severely affected tissue with marked fatty infiltration of muscle tissue.
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common hereditary muscle disorders in adults, affecting 12/100,000 people.1 It is characterized by asymmetrical muscle involvement, with prominent weakness of the face, shoulder girdle, and foot dorsiflexors. In later stages, weakness extends to the hamstrings, trunk, and pelvic girdle.2 Disease progression is associated with atrophy and fatty infiltration of muscle tissue that can be visualized on MRI.3
The primary mediator of FSHD pathology is considered to be expression of DUX4, a gene epigenetically repressed in most somatic tissues located in each unit of the D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4.4 In patients with FSHD, inappropriate DUX4 protein expression in skeletal muscle is facilitated by D4Z4 chromatin relaxation. This only occurs from the permissive 4qA haplotype, which contains a polymorphic polyadenylation signal that stabilizes the DUX4 transcript in somatic tissue.4 In FSHD1, the most common form of FSHD (95% of all cases), chromatin relaxation is the result of shortening of the D4Z4 repeat to ≤10 units.5 In FSHD2, chromatin relaxation is the result of a heterozygous mutation in D4Z4 chromatin regulators such as SMCHD1 or rarely DNMT3B, together with a relative shortening of the D4Z4 repeat to ≤20 units.6,7
Following the discovery of the genetic cause of FSHD, research has focused on the downstream effects of DUX4 expression. DUX4 is a transcription factor that is normally expressed in the human germline during early development, where it appears to play a role in zygotic genome activation.8 When misexpressed in somatic cells, DUX4 activates a complex combination of coding and noncoding DNA elements.9,10 The effects of DUX4 are dose-dependent and include induction of apoptotic cell death, inhibition of myogenesis and muscle regeneration, expression of stem cell genes, and suppression of the innate immune response.9–14 The effect of DUX4 on muscle contractility is largely unknown. Increasing this knowledge is important as small molecule drugs are being developed that improve muscle fiber contractility.15,16
We have previously investigated the contractile properties of FSHD muscle fibers in a pilot study and demonstrated alterations in sarcomeric function, which included reduced specific force in type 2 muscle fibers and increased myofilament calcium sensitivity of force.17 Single muscle fiber specific force, that is, the amount of force generated corrected for fiber size, is an important determinant of in vivo muscle strength. Myofilament calcium sensitivity of force reflects the ease of skeletal muscle contraction in response to calcium.
Our previous study included only 4 muscle biopsies, which precluded associations with disease severity and warranted confirmation in a larger cohort. In the current study, we included 14 patients with FSHD and 12 healthy controls. Each participant contributed 2 muscle biopsies: one from the vastus lateralis and one from the tibialis anterior. We investigated single muscle fiber contractile properties in 547 single muscle fibers obtained from these muscle biopsies and correlated our findings with FSHD disease severity using quantitative muscle MRI.
Methods
Participants
Patients with genetically confirmed FSHD were recruited from the Radboud University Medical Center. Healthy individuals without a history of neuromuscular disease were included as controls. Exclusion criteria were based on contraindications for participation as well as known factors that may influence skeletal muscle function as a whole or single muscle fiber contractility, specifically age <18 or ≥65 years, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, current malignancy, previous treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy, use of corticosteroids during more than 2 weeks in the last 5 years, current use of statins, wheelchair bound, or contraindications for MRI or muscle biopsy.18 Age matching was applied on the group level, resulting in an adjustment of the lower age limit to ∼40 years during patient recruitment. FSHD disease severity was assessed using the Ricci et al.19 clinical severity scale (CSS). Muscle strength was tested using the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading scale.
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents
The Medical Ethics Review Committee region Arnhem-Nijmegen approved this study (no. 2011/181). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Quantitative muscle MRI
Prior to MRI, muscle strength of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior were assessed with manual muscle testing using the MRC grading scale. The right leg was biopsied except in the presence of asymmetric weakness, in which case the weakest leg was biopsied. The prospective biopsy site was marked on the skin at about 1/3 of the distance between anterior superior iliac spine and patella for the upper leg and on the maximum muscle bulk of the tibialis anterior for the lower leg. Prior to MRI scanning, a fish oil marker was attached to the skin at the prospective muscle biopsy site. Next, transversal T1-weighted and multiecho T2 images and turbo inversion recovery sequences (TIRM) of the upper and lower leg were acquired on a 3T MRI system (Tim TRIO; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), centered on the fish oil marker to facilitate correlation between radiologic findings and tissue-based studies. MRI-guided FSHD vastus lateralis muscle biopsies (see below) were performed immediately after MRI scanning. All other biopsies (see below) were performed on the same day, targeting the marked biopsy site. The percentage of fatty infiltration of the vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior was quantified by manually tracing the outline of the muscle on the multiecho T2 images corresponding to the fish oil marker. For MRI-guided biopsies, an additional fat percentage was determined in a ∼1 cm circular area drawn around the MRI-guided biopsy site.20 FSHD biopsies obtained from a muscle or area with <15% of fatty infiltration are referred to as FSHDNORMAL. FSHD biopsies obtained from a muscle or area with ≥15% of fatty infiltration are referred to as FSHDFAT.
Muscle biopsy collection
One muscle of the vastus lateralis and one of the tibialis anterior was obtained from each participant. Bergström needle biopsies were performed by an experienced neurology resident (S.L.) taking routine antiseptic precautions.21 In patients with FSHD, all vastus lateralis muscle biopsies except one were performed with MRI guidance by an intervention radiologist.22 This was done to obtain a precise measure of the amount of fatty infiltration and TIRM hyperintensity at the muscle biopsy site. This was helpful because in patients with FSHD, fatty infiltration of the vastus lateralis can be patchy even on a transverse axial plane, and TIRM hyperintensity can be focal. The tibialis anterior was chosen because this muscle is affected early and severely in patients with FSHD. The vastus lateralis was included to obtain additional tissue from a less affected muscle in the lower limb. In all cases, biopsy specimens were split in sections and either snap-frozen in isopentane and stored at −80°C for morphometric and immunohistochemical analysis or deposited in a solution containing half glycerol and half relaxing solution and stored at −20°C for single fiber studies. The composition of these solutions is described elsewhere.23
Immunohistochemistry
Frozen sections underwent hematoxylin phloxine staining to evaluate variability in fiber size, extent of central nucleation, necrosis and regeneration, and interstitial fibrosis, which were graded as normal (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3). Severity scores of these 4 measures were then added to provide a cumulative histopathologic sum score between 0 and 12.24 All histopathology sum scores were assigned by an experienced neuropathologist who was not aware whether a biopsy belonged to the FSHD or control group.
Single muscle fiber studies
Fiber preparation
Biopsy material was placed in a relaxing solution containing 1% Triton X-100 and kept at 4°C during isolation of single muscle fibers.25 Triton is used to permeabilize the plasma membranes, resulting in “skinned” muscle fibers, which permits analysis of sarcomeric function. Protease inhibitors were added to the solution to prevent protein degradation. Single muscle fibers were isolated and fiber ends were attached to aluminum t-clips, which were mounted between a length motor on one end and a force transducer on the other. Sarcomere length was set at 2.5 µm for measurements of maximum and specific force, cross-bridge cycling kinetics, and calcium sensitivity of force. Fiber width and depth were measured to calculate the fiber cross-sectional area.
Maximum and specific force
We determined maximum force at a sarcomere length of 2.5 μm by activating the fibers with a saturating Ca2+ solution (pCa 4.5). Specific force was determined by dividing the maximum force by the fiber cross-sectional area, reflecting the force generated by the sarcomeres.
Cross-bridge cycling kinetics
After development of maximum force, rapid unloading and shortening of the muscle fiber was applied to determine the rate constant of force redevelopment (ktr). The ktr reflects the fraction of strongly bound cross-bridges. After redevelopment of maximum force, slight length perturbations of −0.9%, −0.6%, −0.3%, 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0.9% were imposed on the muscle fiber to determine active stiffness, which reflects the number of attached cross-bridges during activation. Specific force was divided by normalized active stiffness to calculate the tension/stiffness ratio, which reflects the amount of force generated per cross-bridge (assuming intact myofibrils).
Calcium sensitivity of force
After measurement of maximum force and cross-bridge cycling kinetics, the fiber was rested for 5 minutes. Sarcomere length was verified and adjusted if necessary before continuing with the measurements. Calcium sensitivity of force was determined by transferring the muscle fiber to solutions with incremental concentrations of Ca2+ (pCa 6.2–4.5). Fibers were excluded if maximum force at pCa 4.5 decreased ≥25% from the force obtained during measurement of maximum force and cross-bridge cycling kinetics. Force-pCa data were fitted to the Hill equation to provide the pCa50, which is the pCa at which 50% of maximal active tension is reached. The steepness of the force-calcium sensitivity curve h (Hillslope) represents the degree of actin-myosin cross-bridge cooperativity.26
Passive force
After measurement of calcium sensitivity, the fiber was loosened and rested for 5 minutes. Fibers were set at their slack length (i.e., the fiber length at which passive force is zero) and from there were stretched with a constant velocity of 10% length change/second to a sarcomere length of 3.2 µm, held for 90 seconds, and then released back to slack length. Tension development during stretch was determined to assess passive force. Sarcomere length was assessed during the hold phase; fibers with inhomogeneous sarcomere length distribution (≥0.3 µm variation) were excluded from the analysis.
Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) fiber typing
After contractile experiments, individual fibers were stored in 25 µL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer until MyHC isoforms analysis. MyHC isoform composition and concentration of isolated single fibers was determined using SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.27 Sample volumes of 8 µL were loaded per lane. Gels were run for 24 hours at 15°C and a constant voltage of 275 V. The composition of the sample buffer and stacking gel is described elsewhere.23 In hybrid fibers (15% of FSHD and 9% of control fibers), fiber type was assigned as type 1 or type 2 based on the predominant MyHC isoform. Because there was only a limited amount of type 2X fibers (6 FSHD and 4 control fibers), these were analyzed together with type 2A fibers.
Titin content and PEVK phosphorylation
Flash frozen biopsies were ground to a fine powder and resuspended in an 8M urea buffer, with 50% glycerol and protease inhibitors. Tissue homogenates were run on a 1% SDS–agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) gel to electrophorically separate titin from other proteins. Gels were run at 15 mA per gel for 3 hours and 15 minutes, then stained using Neuhoff Coomassie brilliant blue staining protocol and scanned using a commercial scanner (Epson 800; Epson Corporation, Long Beach, CA). For western blots, samples were run on 0.8% SDS-AGE and subsequently transferred onto Immobilon‐P PVDF 0.45 μm membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA) using a semi-dry transfer cell for 2.5 hours at 1.3 mA/cm2. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against titin N-terminus (TTN monoclonal antibody [M09], clone 6H5; Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), C-terminus (M8M9; Myomedix, Mannheim, Germany), PEVK region (clone 9D10; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA), and phospho-specific antibodies against PEVK S11878 and S12022 (serine locations based on the cardiac isoform, sequence Q8WZ42-3; custom antibodies) at 4°C overnight.28,29 Infrared western blots were analyzed using Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li‐Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE).
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Ordinal data were analyzed using χ2. Single fiber measurements were analyzed with linear mixed models. A random intercept was modeled for individual biopsies and individual participants, using a variance components covariance structure. Post hoc comparisons were assessed using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Passive tension curve fits were analyzed with a 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by linear mixed models to assess differences between groups at different sarcomere lengths. Titin ratios were determined by taking the linear intercept of multiple increasing total protein sample loadings as a function of the concurrent MyHC intercept. Data are reported as mean ± SEM or median ± interquartile range unless otherwise specified.
Data availability
Anonymized data are available on request via the corresponding author. Supplemental tables are available at doi.org/10.5061/dryad.04gq02h.
Results
Participants and muscle biopsies
We included 14 patients with FSHD and 12 healthy controls who did not differ in age, sex distribution, or body mass index (BMI) (age: FSHD 53.4 ± 1.3 years, control 53.8 ± 1.7 years, p = 0.823; sex: 50% male in both groups, p = 1.000; BMI: FSHD 25.3 ± 1.0, control 27.3 ± 1.5, p = 0.267). Mean FSHD disease duration was 29.6 ± 3.4 years and median Ricci Clinical Severity Score was 6.0 ± 4.3. Detailed information about individual participants with FSHD is provided in table 1. From these participants, we obtained 26 vastus lateralis and 24 tibialis anterior muscle biopsies. Fatty infiltration of the vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior on MRI ranged from 1.1% to 97.4% in participants with FSHD (figure 1). Sixteen FSHD biopsies were obtained from a muscle or area with <15% of fatty infiltration on MRI and are referred to as FSHDNORMAL. Ten FSHD biopsies were obtained from a muscle or area with ≥15% of fatty infiltration and are referred to as FSHDFAT (table 2). In vivo muscle strength measured with the MRC grading scale (0–5) was normal in healthy control and FSHDNORMAL muscles. Muscle strength was reduced in FSHDFAT quadriceps and tibialis anterior. Histopathologic sum scores did not significantly differ between healthy control and FSHDNORMAL muscle biopsies but were increased in FSHDFAT muscle biopsies (table 2).
Table 1.
Participants with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) and muscle biopsies
Figure 1. Example T1 MRI.
(A) MRI scan of the right upper leg of participant F8, a 49-year-old man with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) with a clinical severity scale (CSS) score of 4/10. MRI-guided biopsy site with 0% fatty infiltration. (B) MRI scan of the right upper leg of participant F10, a 61-year-old man with FSHD2 and a CSS score of 6/10. MRI-guided biopsy site with 65% fatty infiltration. A more lateral biopsy site was chosen because only fat was present underneath the marker site. (C) MRI scan of the left upper leg of participant F5, a 49-year-old woman with FSHD with a CSS score of 8/10. MRI-guided biopsy site with 88% fatty infiltration. *MRI-guided muscle biopsy site in the vastus lateralis.
Table 2.
Muscle biopsy characteristics
Single muscle fiber contractile properties
Single muscle fiber studies: Maximum and specific force
Single muscle fiber studies were performed in all biopsies. For each muscle biopsy, 10–19 single muscle fibers were measured (547 fibers in total, table 3). In vastus lateralis type 1 (slow-twitch) single muscle fibers, we observed no significant differences in fiber cross-sectional area, maximum force, and specific force among FSHDALL, FSHDNORMAL, and FSHDFAT fibers compared to healthy controls. Vastus lateralis type 2 (fast-twitch) single muscle fibers obtained from FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT biopsies had an increased cross-sectional area compared to healthy controls and showed increased maximum force generation. Specific force, that is, the amount of force corrected for fiber cross-sectional area, was unchanged in all FSHD vastus lateralis single muscle fibers. This indicates that sarcomeric contractile function is intact at saturating calcium concentrations. In tibialis anterior type 1 and type 2 single muscle fiber cross-sectional area, maximum force and specific force did not differ among FSHDALL, FSHDNORMAL, and FSHDFAT tibialis anterior fibers compared to healthy controls.
Table 3.
Single muscle fiber studies: cross-sectional area and maximum force
Single muscle fiber studies: Cross-bridge cycling kinetics
In line with our finding that FSHD single muscle fiber specific force is not different from healthy controls, we found no differences in cross-bridge cycling kinetics (table e-1, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.04gq02h).
Single fiber studies: Calcium sensitivity of force
The calcium sensitivity of force was measured in 221 healthy control and 194 FSHD single muscle fibers. The pCa50, which represents the negative logarithm of the Ca2+ concentration at which single muscle fibers produce 50% of their maximum force, was significantly increased in all fibers obtained from FSHDFAT muscle biopsies compared to fibers obtained from healthy control and FSHDNORMAL muscle biopsies. This indicates that calcium sensitivity of force is increased in single muscle fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies. There was no difference between fibers obtained from vastus lateralis compared to fibers obtained from tibialis anterior FSHDFAT muscle biopsies (p = 0.858, table 4 and figure 2), nor was there a difference between type 1 and type 2 FSHDFAT fibers (p = 0.596).
Table 4.
Single muscle fiber studies: calcium sensitivity of force
Figure 2. Increased calcium sensitivity of force in FSHDFAT muscle fibers maintains specific force.
(A, B) Normalized force pCa and analysis of pCa50—the pCa at which 50% of maximum force is reached—of vastus lateralis type 1 fibers demonstrates that calcium sensitivity of force is increased in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) muscle fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies, while specific force is preserved. Physiologic (Ca2+) range during muscle contraction is marked by the gray area. (C, D) Normalized force pCa and analysis of pCa50 of vastus lateralis type 2 demonstrates increased normalized force generation at a physiologic pCa of 6.0, with preserved specific force generation. (E, F) Normalized force pCa and analysis of pCa50 of tibialis anterior type 1 fibers demonstrates that calcium sensitivity of force is increased in FSHD muscle fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies, while specific force is preserved. (G, H) Normalized force pCa and analysis of pCa50 of tibialis anterior type 2 fibers demonstrates that calcium sensitivity is increased in FSHD muscle fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies, while specific force is preserved.
Single muscle fiber studies: Force at physiologic Ca2+ concentrations
During maximal contraction, intracellular Ca2+ may rise from resting levels of ∼0.1 µM (pCa 7.0) to 10 µM (pCa 5.0; a 100-fold increase). However, in physiologic conditions, muscle fibers usually operate at submaximal calcium concentrations, typically resulting in a Ca2+ concentration of 1–3 µM (pCa 6.0–∼5.5). Specific force at physiologic Ca2+ concentrations did not differ between single muscle fibers obtained from healthy control compared to fibers obtained from FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT biopsies, despite markedly increased calcium sensitivity in fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies (figure 2). We conclude that increased calcium sensitivity in single muscle fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies maintains specific force generation at physiologic Ca2+ concentrations.
Single muscle fiber studies: Cooperativity of activation
The steepness of the force-calcium sensitivity curve was significantly increased in FSHDFAT tibialis anterior type 1 fibers, but not in FSHDFAT vastus lateralis or FSHDFAT tibialis anterior type 2 fibers. This indicates that increased FSHDFAT muscle fiber calcium sensitivity we observed in all FSHDFAT single muscle fibers is not caused by increased cooperativity of activation (table e-2, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.04gq02h). In other words, the slope of the FSHD force–pCa curve is not changed compared to healthy controls but is shifted leftward on the X-axis.
Single muscle fiber studies: Passive force
Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that increased calcium sensitivity of force in FSHDFAT biopsies is caused by titin-based stiffening of muscle fibers and consequential facilitation of actin–myosin coupling.17 Hence, we measured single muscle fiber passive force, which in skinned fibers reflects titin-based stiffness. Only a limited amount of FSHD fibers were available for analysis of passive force (80 healthy control, 29 FSHDNORMAL, and 15 FSHDFAT single muscle fibers). Hence, we were limited to comparison of healthy control, FSHDNORMAL, and FSHDFAT subgroups without individual analyses per fiber type or muscle.
Passive force development was significantly higher in single muscle fibers obtained from FSHD muscle biopsies (FSHDALL) compared to healthy control muscle fibers (p = 0.021 for FSHDALL vs healthy control), resulting in increased fiber stiffness. Passive force development was significantly increased in fibers obtained from FSHDNORMAL biopsies (p = 0.026 for FSHDNORMAL vs healthy control, figure 3A). Passive force development was also increased in fibers obtained from FSHDFAT biopsies, but this finding failed to reached significance, most likely due to low statistical power (p = 0.143 for FSHDFAT vs healthy control, p = 0.784 for FSHDNORMAL vs FSHDFAT; figure 3A).
Figure 3. Passive force, titin content, and titin phosphorylation.
(A) Single muscle fibers are stretched from slack length to a sarcomere length of 3.2 µm. Resulting passive force development differs in single muscle fibers obtained from FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT muscle biopsies compared to healthy control fibers but does not differ between facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) subgroups. There are no significant differences between groups in post hoc comparisons at different sarcomere lengths. (B) Vastus lateralis titin content, measured as the ratio between total titin and total myosin heavy chain (MyHC), is significantly increased in FSHDALL muscle biopsies, but does not differ between FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT subgroups. (C) Representative vastus lateralis titin content gels for healthy controls (shown is the vastus lateralis muscle biopsy from participant C3), FSHDNORMAL (participant F1), and FSHDFAT (participant F5) biopsies. (D) No change in total PEVK signal, suggesting splicing of titin is not affected. (E, F) No change in phosphorylation pS11878 and pS12022 within the titin PEVK segment, which suggests that increased passive force is not directly mediated by either alternative titin splicing or through PKCa phosphorylation of the c-terminal PEVK region.
Post hoc comparisons of passive force at different sarcomere lengths showed no significant difference between FSHDALL compared to healthy control, nor between FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT subgroups compared to healthy control muscle fibers. These findings indicate that passive force development is increased in all FSHD fibers, independent of the amount of fatty infiltration. Hence, the increased calcium sensitivity of force that was only observed in FSHDFAT fibers is not related to increased fiber stiffness in FSHDFAT single muscle fibers.
Muscle biopsy studies: titin content and phosphorylation
We analyzed titin content and phosphorylation of the titin PEVK segment in vastus lateralis biopsies. Compatible with our single muscle fiber results, titin content was increased in all FSHD biopsies compared to healthy controls but did not differ between FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT vastus lateralis muscle biopsies (p = 0.020 for FSHDALL compared to healthy control, figure 3C). PEVK phosphorylation was only examined in FSHDFAT vastus lateralis muscle biopsies and did not differ from healthy control vastus lateralis biopsies (figure 3, D–F).
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the contractile properties of 547 single muscle fibers isolated from 50 muscle biopsies from 14 patients with FSHD and 12 healthy controls. Single muscle fiber specific force measurements at physiologic and saturating Ca2+ concentrations did not differ from healthy controls, even in fibers obtained from fat infiltrated muscles. This indicates that sarcomeric function is intact and that clinical muscle weakness in patients with FSHD is not caused by reduced specific force of individual muscle fibers.
Single muscle fiber calcium sensitivity of force, which is an important measure that determines the ease of skeletal muscle contraction in response to calcium, was increased in single muscle fibers obtained from FSHD muscle biopsies with fatty infiltration (FSHDFAT) compared to fibers obtained from healthy controls. However, increased calcium sensitivity of force did not result in supramaximal specific force generation. This suggests that increased calcium sensitivity in FSHDFAT single muscle fibers is a compensatory mechanism to maintain specific force in muscles with fatty infiltration.
In other muscle diseases, alternations in single muscle fiber calcium sensitivity of force are usually the result of mutations that directly alter the structural elements of the sarcomere. For example, increased calcium sensitivity of force has been observed in muscle fibers of patients with TPM2 and TPM3 mutations.30 Single muscle fiber calcium sensitivity of force was intact in muscle biopsies from patients with inclusion body myositis, an acquired muscle disease with marked inflammation and fatty infiltration.31 However, these fibers also had reduced specific force due to myosin loss, which may prohibit compensatory changes in calcium sensitivity.
Single muscle fiber contractile function has previously been investigated in various other neuromuscular disorders. Specific force is generally reduced in myopathies that involve mutations of the force-generating structural components of the sarcomere, such as nemaline myopathy caused by mutations in NEB, ACTA1, TPM2, and TPM3.30 Reduced muscle fiber specific force is also found in myotonic dystrophy, a multisystem disorder caused by a repeat expansion of the DMPK gene, and in inclusion body myositis, an inflammatory and degenerative acquired muscle disease.31,32 In contrast, single muscle fiber specific force in FSHD is intact even in severely affected tissue with marked fatty infiltration. This indicates that muscle weakness in FSHD does not occur through a primary effect of DUX4 on muscle fiber contractility. Instead, muscle weakness in FSHD is most likely the result of DUX4-induced toxicity and consequential loss of muscle fibers resulting in atrophy and fatty infiltration, but not through a primary effect on muscle fiber contractility.
Our current findings contrast with previous results of a pilot study from our group that showed reduced specific force in type 2 FSHD single muscle fibers obtained from 4 FSHD muscle biopsies.17 Aside from the smaller sample size, the divergent results can also be explained by differences in the healthy control groups. In the pilot study, the control group consisted of relatively young, physically active volunteers. In the current study, we deliberately selected healthy controls with similar age, sex, and lifestyle.
Based on previous findings in 4 FSHD muscle biopsies, we hypothesized that increased calcium sensitivity results from reduced myofilament lattice spacing induced by changes in muscle fiber passive tension.17 However, our current findings in this larger cohort disprove this hypothesis. Although passive force development was increased in FSHDNORMAL and FSHDFAT single muscle fibers, changes in passive force did not explain the increased calcium sensitivity of force that was exclusive to FSHDFAT muscle fibers.
In skinned single muscle fibers, passive force is primarily mediated by titin, an elastic myofilament that functions as a molecular spring that extends and generates force when muscles are stretched.33 In this study, the increased passive force in all FSHD single muscle fibers was associated with an increased titin/MyHC ratio. In the sarcomere, titin stoichiometry dictates a 6:1 ratio of titin molecules per half sarcomere.34 Our findings might suggest a change in this ratio, due to incorporation of an increased number of titin molecules per half sarcomere—a reduced amount of myosin heavy chain molecules would have resulted in reduced single muscle fiber specific force. The presence of changes in passive force development even in mildly affected muscle biopsies without fatty infiltration suggests that this may be an early consequence of disease pathology. Whether DUX4 plays a role in the observed changes in passive force development warrants further investigation.
The strength of this study is the large size of the cohort of patients with FSHD and the inclusion of healthy control biopsies specifically collected for this study. Furthermore, we have used quantitative MRI and MRI-guided muscle biopsies to compare changes in early disease (associated with low levels of fatty infiltration <15%) with progressive disease in fat infiltrated muscle biopsies. The MRI-guided muscle biopsy technique allowed us to obtain an exact measurement of fatty infiltration in vastus lateralis muscle biopsies. Longitudinal studies with repeated muscle biopsies would provide additional information, but it is difficult to engage participants for repeated follow-up biopsies. In this study, almost all participants contributed 2 muscle biopsies on the same day.
Our study has several limitations. First, we used permeabilized single muscle fibers to investigate changes on the level of the sarcomere. This technique prohibits the measurement of upstream processes in excitation–contraction coupling, such as calcium handling or calcium signaling. A previous study found no difference in calcium handling or calcium signaling between FSHD and control myotubes, which suggests that excitation–contraction coupling and calcium handling are intact.35 Furthermore, isolation of single muscle fibers may favor stronger fibers due to exclusion of fibers with reduced quality on visual inspection or fibers that break prior to initiation of the measurement protocol. Passive force measurements were limited by a small number of fibers.
This study demonstrates that clinical muscle weakness in patients with FSHD is not caused by reduced specific force of individual muscle fibers, even in severely affected tissue with marked fatty infiltration of muscle tissue on muscle MRI. Although specific force is intact at physiologic and saturating Ca2+ concentrations, other contractile measures are changed in FSHD single muscle fibers. Muscle fiber calcium sensitivity of force was increased in severely affected tissue and probably is a compensatory mechanism to maintain specific force. Development of passive force was increased in FSHD muscle with and without fatty infiltration, suggesting an early event in disease pathology. Our results increase our understanding of the development of clinical muscle weakness in patients with FSHD.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank M. Linkels and K. Kardux for performing the SDS-PAGE gels for MHC isoform composition, K. Kardux for assistance in the single fiber measurements, Shengyi Shen, PhD, for performing the titin content and phosphorylation studies, and Henk Granzier for the phospho-specific antibodies against PEVK S11878 and S12022.
Glossary
- AGE
agarose gel electrophoresis
- ANOVA
analysis of variance
- BMI
body mass index
- CSS
clinical severity scale
- FSHD
facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
- MRC
Medical Research Council
- MyHC
myosin heavy chain
- SDS
sodium dodecyl sulfate
- TIRM
turbo inversion recovery sequences
Appendix. Authors


Study funding
This study was supported by the Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds and Stichting Spieren voor Spieren (grant W.OR10-30 to B.G.M.v.E. and C.A.C.O.) and by the NIH (grant R01HL121500 to C.A.C.O.).
Disclosure
S. Lassche, N. Voermans, R. van der Pijl, M. van den Berg, A. Heerschap, H. van Hees, and B. Kusters report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. S. van der Maarel reports grants from NIH, Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds and EU-FP7 and has several patents issued. C. Ottenheijm reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. B. van Engelen reports grants from Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds, Association Française contre les Myopathies, Stichting Spieren voor Spieren, FSHD Stichting, and NWO. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
References
- 1.Deenen JC, Arnts H, van der Maarel SM, et al. Population-based incidence and prevalence of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Neurology 2014;83:1056–1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mul K, Lassche S, Voermans NC, Padberg GW, Horlings CG, van Engelen BG. What's in a name? The clinical features of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Pract Neurol 2016;16:201–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mul K, Vincenten SCC, Voermans NC, et al. Adding quantitative muscle MRI to the FSHD clinical trial toolbox. Neurology 2017;89:2057–2065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lemmers RJ, van der Vliet PJ, Klooster R, et al. A unifying genetic model for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Science 2010;329:1650–1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wijmenga C, Hewitt JE, Sandkuijl LA, et al. Chromosome 4q DNA rearrangements associated with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet 1992;2:26–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lemmers RJ, Tawil R, Petek LM, et al. Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHD-permissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2. Nat Genet 2012;44:1370–1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van den Boogaard ML, Lemmers R, Balog J, et al. Mutations in DNMT3B modify epigenetic repression of the D4Z4 repeat and the penetrance of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:1020–1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Iaco A, Planet E, Coluccio A, Verp S, Duc J, Trono D. DUX-family transcription factors regulate zygotic genome activation in placental mammals. Nat Genet 2017;49:941–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Geng LN, Yao Z, Snider L, et al. DUX4 activates germline genes, retroelements, and immune mediators: implications for facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Dev Cell 2012;22:38–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bosnakovski D, Xu Z, Gang EJ, et al. An isogenetic myoblast expression screen identifies DUX4-mediated FSHD-associated molecular pathologies. EMBO J 2008;27:2766–2779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bosnakovski D, Chan SSK, Recht OO, et al. Muscle pathology from stochastic low level DUX4 expression in an FSHD mouse model. Nat Commun 2017;8:550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kowaljow V, Marcowycz A, Ansseau E, et al. The DUX4 gene at the FSHD1A locus encodes a pro-apoptotic protein. Neuromuscul Disord 2007;17:611–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vanderplanck C, Ansseau E, Charron S, et al. The FSHD atrophic myotube phenotype is caused by DUX4 expression. PLoS One 2011;6:e26820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wallace LM, Garwick SE, Mei W, et al. DUX4, a candidate gene for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, causes p53-dependent myopathy in vivo. Ann Neurol 2011;69:540–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Russell AJ, Hartman JJ, Hinken AC, et al. Activation of fast skeletal muscle troponin as a potential therapeutic approach for treating neuromuscular diseases. Nat Med 2012;18:452–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Winter JM, Buck D, Hidalgo C, et al. Troponin activator augments muscle force in nemaline myopathy patients with nebulin mutations. J Med Genet 2013;50:383–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lassche S, Stienen GJ, Irving TC, et al. Sarcomeric dysfunction contributes to muscle weakness in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology 2013;80:733–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lassche S, Ottenheijm CA, Voermans NC, et al. Determining the role of sarcomeric proteins in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a study protocol. BMC Neurol 2013;13:144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ricci E, Galluzzi G, Deidda G, et al. Progress in the molecular diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and correlation between the number of KpnI repeats at the 4q35 locus and clinical phenotype. Ann Neurol 1999;45:751–757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kan HE, Scheenen TW, Wohlgemuth M, et al. Quantitative MR imaging of individual muscle involvement in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord 2009;19:357–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shanely RA, Zwetsloot KA, Triplett NT, Meaney MP, Farris GE, Nieman DC. Human skeletal muscle biopsy procedures using the modified Bergstrom technique. J Vis Exp 2014;91:51812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lassche S, Janssen BH, Jzermans TI, et al. MRI-guided biopsy as a tool for diagnosis and research of muscle disorders. J Neuromuscul Dis 2018;5:315–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stienen GJ, Kiers JL, Bottinelli R, Reggiani C. Myofibrillar ATPase activity in skinned human skeletal muscle fibres: fibre type and temperature dependence. J Physiol 1996;493:299–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Statland JM, Shah B, Henderson D, Van Der Maarel S, Tapscott SJ, Tawil R. Muscle pathology grade for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy biopsies. Muscle Nerve 2015;52:521–526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ottenheijm CA, Hooijman P, DeChene ET, Stienen GJ, Beggs AH, Granzier H. Altered myofilament function depresses force generation in patients with nebulin-based nemaline myopathy (NEM2). J Struct Biol 2010;170:334–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gordon AM, Homsher E, Regnier M. Regulation of contraction in striated muscle. Physiol Rev 2000;80:853–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Warren CM, Krzesinski PR, Greaser ML. Vertical agarose gel electrophoresis and electroblotting of high-molecular-weight proteins. Electrophoresis 2003;24:1695–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hidalgo CG, Chung CS, Saripalli C, et al. The multifunctional Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II delta (CaMKIIdelta) phosphorylates cardiac titin's spring elements. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2013;54:90–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hidalgo C, Hudson B, Bogomolovas J, et al. PKC phosphorylation of titin's PEVK element: a novel and conserved pathway for modulating myocardial stiffness. Circ Res 2009;105:631–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.de Winter JM, Ottenheijm CAC. Sarcomere dysfunction in nemaline myopathy. J Neuromuscul Dis 2017;4:99–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lassche S, Rietveld A, Heerschap A, et al. Muscle fiber dysfunction contributes to weakness in inclusion body myositis. Neuromuscul Disord 2019;29:468–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Krivickas LS, Ansved T, Suh D, Frontera WR. Contractile properties of single muscle fibers in myotonic dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:529–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brynnel A, Hernandez Y, Kiss B, et al. Downsizing the molecular spring of the giant protein titin reveals that skeletal muscle titin determines passive stiffness and drives longitudinal hypertrophy. Elife 2018;7:e40532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cazorla O, Freiburg A, Helmes M, et al. Differential expression of cardiac titin isoforms and modulation of cellular stiffness. Circ Res 2000;86:59–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vandebrouck C, Imbert N, Constantin B, Duport G, Raymond G, Cognard C. Normal calcium homeostasis in dystrophin-expressing facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy myotubes. Neuromuscul Disord 2002;12:266–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Anonymized data are available on request via the corresponding author. Supplemental tables are available at doi.org/10.5061/dryad.04gq02h.








