Skip to main content
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI logoLink to Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
. 2020 Mar 26;10(4):556. doi: 10.3390/ani10040556

The First Application of Nanoelectrochemotherapy in Feline Oral Malignant Melanoma Treatment—Case Study

Joanna Tunikowska 1, Agnieszka Antończyk 1, Nina Rembiałkowska 2, Łukasz Jóźwiak 1, Vitalij Novickij 3, Julita Kulbacka 2,*
PMCID: PMC7222405  PMID: 32225098

Abstract

Simple Summary

The current study concerns feline melanoma of the oral cavity, which is rather rarely diagnosed but is usually correlated with poor prognosis. Here we proposed a new treatment modality using CO2 laser surgery with pulsed electric fields with ultra-short pulses in combination with bleomycin. The applied nanoelectrochemotherapy resulted in positive response and satisfactory animal recovery. Thus, nanosecond electroporation seems a reasonable anticancer approach in domestic animals.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to present the first domestic animal trial of nanosecond electroporation with chemotherapy and CO2 laser surgery. Methods: sixteen-year-old domestic cat with diagnosed melanoma on oral cavity was the case used in the study. Firstly, CO2 laser surgery was used for the removal of most of tumor mass. Then nanoelectrochemotherapy with bleomycin was applied including appropriate margin of healthy tissue. A 15 ± 4 kV/cm × 15 ns pulsing protocol was employed with a total of 800 ± 100 pulses. Only one session of nanoelectrochemotherapy (nanoECT) was performed. Results and conclusions: during the next two weeks areas of focal necrosis were replaced by the granulation tissue. Complete wound healing was observed four weeks after initial treatment. After 15 weeks post treatment, no local recurrence was apparent.

Keywords: feline melanoma, electrochemotherapy, nanosecond pulsed electric field, CO2 laser

1. Introduction

Melanoma of the oral cavity is relatively rare in cats, and its diagnosis is usually associated with poor prognosis [1]. Local control of this tumor requires wide surgical excision with additional medical treatment [2].

Electroporation is a phenomenon of pulsed electric field (PEF) initiated permeabilization of biological cell plasma membrane, which serves as a basepoint of many successful biomedical and biotechnological methodologies including electrochemotherapy (ECT) for cancer treatment. ECT is as effective combination of chemotherapeutic and electroporation, where microsecond pulses up to few kV are applied. The available research studies proved that electrochemotherapy can be efficiently applied in combination with bleomycin in soft-tissue sarcomas [3] and tumors with a small surgical safety margin, such as the limb extremities, skull, oral cavity, neck and perianal region [4]. Nanoelectrochemotherapy (NanoECT) is a new modality of electrochemotherapy not applied in clinical practice, which employs nanosecond range (10–300 ns) but high intensity pulses for cell membrane reorganization and simultaneous improved drug delivery [5,6]. The previous study demonstrated that 10ns pulses supported strontium ranelate transport across cell membranes in various cancer cell models, in particular in resistant cells. It was proved that nsPEF significantly inhibited tumor cell growth and affected intracellular structure [7]. In the other experimental examination, nanosecond pulses assisted photosensitizer delivery and simultaneously enhanced the final photodynamic effect in gastric cancer, melanoma and skin cancer [8]. Nanoelectroporation was also indicated as an apoptotic signal stimulator in various human cancer cell models [9,10,11].

The clinical applications of the microsecond ECT revealed a promising usefulness in local tumor control, thus the main objective of this study was to evaluate application of nanoECT as a supportive treatment for incomplete surgical excision in local tumor control in the domestic animal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Presentation

A 16-year-old, domestic shorthair cat was referred to the veterinary center with chronic renal failure, ptyalism, aphagia and a deformation on the left side of a maxillary area.

The oral mass was located in the caudal portion of the left maxilla, involving caudal lip margin, buccal and gingival tissues. Left mandibular lymph node was firm and fixated in comparison to the opposite site. Based on abdominal ultrasound examination and thoracic radiographs, no distant metastases at initial evaluation were noted. Fine needle aspiration of the tumor mass and left submandibular lymph node revealed infiltration with melanocytes and melanoblasts indicating malignant melanoma. The cat was staged III according to the alternative system for staging canine oral melanoma [12]. The owner of the cat chose and approved the palliative treatment in form of nanoelectrochemotherapy.

2.2. CO2 Laser Surgery and nanoECT Treatment

Surgery was conducted under short infusion anesthesia and local anesthesia (Figure 1A,B). The cat was given dexmedetomidine (Dexdomitor, Orion Pharma, Espoo, Finland) at a dose of 40 mcg/kg intramuscularly in premedication. General anesthesia was induced with propofol (Propofol-Lipuro 1%, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) to effect. The cat was intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube (internal diameter 3.5 mm) and was breathing spontaneously with oxygen-enriched air (Figure 1D). Following maxillary, nerve block was performed using lidocaine (Lignocainum Hydrochloricum WZF 2%, Polfa Warsaw, Poland). Additional propofol was administered as a bolus of 1–2 mg/kg when needed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Case representation before, during and after nanoelectrochemotherapy (nanoECT): (A) malignant melanoma of oral cavity in cat prior treatment; (B) marginal excision with CO2 laser; (C) nanoECT after tumor resection; (D) oral cavity after tumor excision and nanoECT; (E) swelling of the upper lip and cheek after nanoECT; (F) tissue necrosis 48 h after nanoECT; (G) slight swelling of the upper lip 4 days after nanoECT; (H) focal necrosis with areas of tissue healing 5 days after nanoECT; (I) focal necrosis with areas of tissue healing 10 days after nanoECT; (J) oral cavity in cat 6 weeks after nanoECT. (own photos)

The tumor mass was excised marginally from the gingival and buccal area with a CO2 laser (Eraser C, Seoul, Korea) working in continuous mode and 10 W of power output (Figure 1B). The excisional site was injected with bleomycin (Bleocel, Celon Laboratories Ltd., Telangana, India) at the dose of 2 mg/m3 and nanoelectroporated (Figure 1C). For pulse delivery, the PPG-20 generator (FID Technology, Burbach, Germany) and an applicator with needle-type (9 mm gap) steel electrodes were used. A 15 ± 4 kV/cm × 15 ns pulsing protocol was employed and a total of 800 ± 100 pulses were delivered to the site at repetition frequency of 200 Hz. (Figure 2A–C). The draining nodes were not incorporated in the electroporation field.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The representation of specialized electrode and its characteristic: (A) Two-needle electrode and (B) electric field distribution; (C) nanosecond pulse shape delivered (15 kV/cm × 15ns, 800 ± 100 pulses).

The patient received buprenorphine (Bupaq Multidose 0.3 mg/mL Richter Pharma AG, Feldgasse, Austria) at a dose of 20 mcg/kg every 8 hours for the first 3 days for postoperative pain management. Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (Synulox 50 mg, Pfizer Trading Poland, Warsaw, Poland) at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg was administered every 12 hours for two weeks. Single injection of a dexamethasone (Rapidexon 2 mL/mL, Eurovet Animal Health B.V., Bladel, Netherlands) at a dose of 1 mg/kg was given to reduce massive swelling of the upper lip and cheek that occurred at the second day after surgery.

2.3. Post Treatment Observations

Three days after the surgery, appetite restoration and normal food intake was noticed. During the next two weeks areas of focal necrosis were replaced by the granulation tissue (Figure 1I). Complete wound healing was observed 4 weeks after initial treatment (and 6 weeks in Figure 1J). Although 15 weeks after ECT no local recurrence was evident, progression of submandibular lymph node enlargement enabled food intake Because no visible distant metastases in abdominal or thoracic cavity were found, decision on surgical lymph node excision was made. Malignant melanoma of the lymph node was confirmed in histopathological examination. Two weeks after lymphadenectomy, worsening of the general health status was observed. Abdominal ultrasound revealed nodular metastatic spread into the visceral organs and euthanasia of the patient took place.

Intraoperatively, no negative tissue effects during nanoelectrochemotherapy (nanoECT) were observed as well as no involuntary skeletal muscle contractions that are characteristic of electrochemotherapy. Despite the promising treatment effects during the perioperative period, further observation of the long-term effects of nanoECT is necessary.

3. Discussion

Oral melanoma is a treatment-resistant cancer in both human and veterinary patients that requires multimodality approaches. Local recurrences of oral malignant melanoma commonly undergo excisions on multiple occasions until the patients die due to metastatic disease [13]. The retrospective study on canine oral melanoma has not found any clear survival benefit with any systemic adjuvant therapy, involving chemotherapy or vaccines against melanoma [14]. The search for the supportive treatment that may improve local tumor control and restore life quality seems to still be a problem in oral malignant melanoma treatment.

In our patient, due to the advanced stage of the disease the intent of the treatment was to obtain prolonged local control without causing massive surgical trauma. We decided to debulk the main tumor mass with CO2 laser because of its hemostatic properties and relatively small thermal effect on surrounding tissues, also no suture placement was necessary. Beneficial in the surgical treatment with CO2 laser in oral cavity pathologies is also the reduction of postoperative pain and reduced scarring [15,16].

Because our patient was suffering from chronic renal failure, supportive treatment like radiation therapy was rejected due to the necessity for multiple sessions and patient anesthetic sedation. The recent studies indicate that irreversible electroporation (IRE) or ECT protocols were extended to nanosecond pulses range duration [17]. Protocols involving nsPEF in vivo application carries the risk of the increased heating in the place of treatment. However, Nuccitelli et al. used 30 kV/cm × 100 ns × 2000 pulses and it was highlighted that up to seven pulses/second can be used without significantly raising the tumor temperature [18]. In our case, we limited the total pulse energy to be on the safe side without measuring the current. The parameters were super-positioned to available in vivo melanoma studies in mice, which is an acceptable approximation in terms of conductivity. We used 200 Hz frequency (200 pulses/second), but the total energy of the burst was more than 60-fold lower, which allowed us to ensure a nonthermal treatment. In the other studies authors were able to maintain constant temperature (43 °C) during the nanosecond procedure [19]. Currently nsPEF clinical trials are not widespread. They are mostly used on melanoma or skin cancers. There was performed split-dose treatments on (KLN 205) squamous carcinoma using 300 ns pulses with bleomycin. Similar electroporation parameters (300 ns) in contrast to ms range were used against murine melanoma. Authors observed that nsPEF reduced or delayed effects on green fluorescent protein (GFP) quenching but it had stronger and more significant effects in tumor size reduction [20]. Garon et al. performed a single in vivo case study using 20 ns electric pulses demonstrating pancreatic tumor regression [21]. One of the major findings is that nanosecond electroporation can permeabilize external and internal cell membranes and distribute the drug more efficiently [22]. Additionally, the application of short electrical pulses is more beneficial due to the minimization of muscle contraction. In the case of animals, treatment of this issue is relevant to conducting anesthesia procedures, which are performed to keep the treated animal in light anesthesia.

4. Conclusions

We have presented the effect of PEF in the submicrosecond range applied to the melanoma case detected in domestic cat. The nsPEF combined with local bleomycin injection resulted in promising treatment effects in this palliative case during the perioperative period. However, this new methodology requires further observation of the long-term effects of nanoelectrochemotherapy.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful for the support of J. Zubkiewicz from “Podaj łapkę Veterinary Center”, Wroclaw, Poland.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.T. and J.K.; methodology, J.T., J.K., A.A., Ł.J. and V.N.; investigation, J.T. and J.K.; resources, X.X.; data curation, J.K., N.R. and V.N.; writing—original draft preparation, J.T and J.K.; writing—review and editing, V.N.; visualization, N.R and V.N.; supervision, J.K.; funding acquisition, J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by National Science Centre (Poland) within a framework of SONATA BIS 6 2016/22/E/NZ5/00671; PI: J. Kulbacka.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Stebbins K.E., Morse C.C., Goldschmidt M.H. Feline Oral Neoplasia: A Ten-Year Survey. Vet. Pathol. 1989;26:121–128. doi: 10.1177/030098588902600204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chamel G., Abadie J., Albaric O., Labrut S., Ponce F., Ibisch C. Non-ocular melanomas in cats: A retrospective study of 30 cases. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2017;19:351–357. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15625355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mir L.M., Devauchelle P., Quintin-Colonna F., Delisle F., Doliger S., Fradelizi D., Belehradek J., Orlowski S. First clinical trial of cat soft tissue sarcomas treatment by electrochemotherapy. Br. J. Cancer. 1997;76:1617–1622. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rangel M.M.M., Luz J.C.S., Oliveira K.D., Ojeda J., Freytag J.O., Suzuki D.O. Electrochemotherapy in the treatment of neoplasms in dogs and cats. Austral. J. Vet. Sci. 2019;51:45–51. doi: 10.4067/S0719-81322019000200045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beebe J.S. Mechanisms of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (NsPEF)-Induced Cell Death in Cells and Tumors. J. Nanomed. Res. 2015;2:1–5. doi: 10.15406/jnmr.2015.02.00016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schoenbach K.H., Beebe S.J., Buescher E.S. Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001;22:440–448. doi: 10.1002/bem.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kulbacka J., Saczko J., Choromańska A., Rembiałkowska N., Dubinska-Magiera M., Surowiak P., Kotulska M. Transmembrane Transport and Anticancer Activity of Strontium Ranelate Delivered with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) into Human Cells in vitro; Proceedings of the IFMBE Proceedings; Toronto, ON, Canada. 7–12 June 2015; [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kulbacka J. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) impact and enhanced Photofrin II® delivery in photodynamic reaction in cancer and normal cells. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2015;12:621–629. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beebe S.J., Blackmore P.F., White J., Joshi R.P., Schoenbach K.H. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields modulate cell function through intracellular signal transduction mechanisms. Physiol. Meas. 2004;25:1077–1093. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/4/023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sundararajan R. Nanosecond electroporation: Another look. Mol. Biotechnol. 2009;41:69–82. doi: 10.1007/s12033-008-9107-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hofmann F., Ohnimus H., Scheller C., Strupp W., Zimmermann U., Jassoy C. Electric field pulses can induce apoptosis. J. Membr. Biol. 1999;169:103–109. doi: 10.1007/s002329900522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hahn K.A., DeNicola D.B., Richardson R.C., Hahn E.A. Canine oral malignant melanoma: Prognostic utility of an alternative staging system. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1994;35:251–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb03273.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luna-Ortiz K., Hidalgo-Bahena S.-C., Muñoz-Gutiérrez T.-L., Mosqueda-Taylor A. Tumors of the oral cavity: CO2 laser management. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2019;24:e84–e88. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Boston S.E., Lu X., Culp W.T.N., Montinaro V., Romanelli G., Dudley R.M., Liptak J.M., Mestrinho L.A., Buracco P. Efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapies administered to dogs after excision of oral malignant melanomas: 151 cases (2001–2012) J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2014;245:401–407. doi: 10.2460/javma.245.4.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coleton S. Lasers in surgical periodontics and oral medicine. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2004;48:937–962. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Silva L., Azevedo P., Ramalho R., Baião R., Nielsen S., Carreira L.M. Comparative Study on the Plasmatic CRP Level Variation in Dogs Undergoing Surgery with CO2 Laser and Scalpel Blade Incisions in a Pre- and Post-Surgical Time-Point. ARC J. Anesthesiol. 2018;3:3–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pakhomova O.N., Gregory B.W., Pakhomov A.G. Facilitation of electroporative drug uptake and cell killing by electrosensitization. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013;17:154–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01658.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nuccitelli R., Wood R., Kreis M., Athos B., Huynh J., Lui K., Nuccitelli P., Epstein E.H. First-in-human trial of nanoelectroablation therapy for basal cell carcinoma: Proof of method. Exp. Dermatol. 2014;23:135–137. doi: 10.1111/exd.12303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Edelblute C.M., Guo S., Hornef J., Yang E., Jiang C., Schoenbach K., Heller R. Moderate Heat Application Enhances the Efficacy of Nanosecond Pulse Stimulation for the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018;17:1533033818802305. doi: 10.1177/1533033818802305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen X., Chen X., Schoenbach K.H., Zheng S., Swanson R.J. Comparative study of long- and short-pulsed electric fields for treating melanoma in an in vivo mouse model. In Vivo. 2011;25:23–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garon E.B., Sawcer D., Vernier P.T., Tang T., Sun Y., Marcu L., Gundersen M.A., Koeffler H.P. In vitro and in vivo evaluation and a case report of intense nanosecond pulsed electric field as a local therapy for human malignancies. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:675–682. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hanna H., Denzi A., Liberti M., André F.M., Mir L.M. Electropermeabilization of Inner and Outer Cell Membranes with Microsecond Pulsed Electric Fields: Quantitative Study with Calcium Ions. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12960-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES