Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping using dye or radioisotopes has been performed in patients with uterine cancer. Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) can be handled safely and is taken up by lymph nodes (LNs); however, its efficacy in detecting SLNs in uterine cancer remains unknown. This pilot study evaluated the use of SPIO as a tracer for SLN detection in patients with uterine cancer. SPIO was injected into the uterine cervixes of 15 patients with uterine cancer scheduled for pelvic LN dissection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed preoperatively. Five patients also underwent radioisotope injection and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Dissected LNs were stained with iron and examined pathologically. Of the radioisotope-positive LNs, 92% were also SPIO/MRI-positive. SPIO/MRI and iron staining were positively correlated. SLNs were identified by iron staining in 93% of cases. Iron staining was strongly positive in two of the five areas of LN metastasis; these were considered SLNs. Staining was negative or very weak in the other three areas and lymph flow disturbance was considered. SPIO and radioisotopes are taken up similarly by SLNs. SPIO/MRI and iron staining may thus be useful for detection of SLNs and diagnosis of LN metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.
Subject terms: Cancer, Surgical oncology
Introduction
Cervical cancer accounts for the third highest number of new cancers and cancer-related deaths among women worldwide, with an estimated 570,000 new cases and 310,000 deaths annually1. In addition, the estimated number of new cases of endometrial cancer annually is 380,0001. Uterine cancer is therefore an important issue for women worldwide.
Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most common form of metastasis of both cervical and endometrial cancers and determines the prognosis of patients with these cancers. LN dissection has thus been a standard surgical procedure for uterine cancer2,3. However, because LN dissection can cause lymphedema, it is beneficial to identify the first metastatic LN, or sentinel LN (SLN), and remove only this LN. SLN mapping has been applied clinically in many cancers, especially breast cancer4. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines indicate that SLN mapping may be considered for early-stage cervical and endometrial cancers5,6. Radioisotopes and dyes, alone or combined, have been used as tracers for SLN mapping7–10. A recent prospective study and meta-analysis also reported the use of indocyanine green (ICG)11,12. Dyes and ICG have the advantage that the lymph flow can be visualized easily by intraoperative administration; however, the procedure must be performed quickly because they are cleared rapidly. Additionally, damage to the lymph vessels during surgery can allow the tracers to leak out, making SLN identification difficult. Furthermore, LNs in the deep pelvis are difficult to identify. Thus, tracers that are retained in the LNs, such as radioisotopes, play an important role. A meta-analysis showed that the SLN-detection rate is increased by a combination of radioisotope and dye13,14. However, radioisotopes are associated with exposure to radiation and patient compliance issues, making their management complicated.
It has been known that magnetic particles, such as superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO), are phagocytosed by macrophages in LNs and thus taken up into them and can then be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)15,16. LN metastasis may impair SPIO uptake due to lymph flow disturbance and destruction of the LN structure17. SPIO administration followed by MRI has been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of LN metastases in lung18, head and neck19, prostate and bladder17,20, rectal21,22, uterine23, and breast cancers16. All these previous reports, except for the one on breast cancer, involved diagnosis of LN metastasis by systemic SPIO administration.
SPIO can act as a retention-type tracer for SLN mapping because it remains within the LNs24–26. Compared with radioisotopes, SPIO is easy to handle and has few adverse effects. Local injection of SPIO as a tracer has been reported in patients with breast cancer24, and its usefulness has been demonstrated in clinical trials25–32. However, although the effectiveness of a magnetic detection system has already been reported for breast cancer33, there is no information on the use of SPIO in patients with uterine cancer.
The current pilot study aimed to examine the usefulness of SPIO injection into the uterine cervix, together with MRI and iron staining, for detecting SLNs and diagnosing LN metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.
Results
Identification of LNs by SPIO and radioisotope
SPIO/MRI was performed 2 days before surgery and radioisotope injection and SPECT/CT 1 day before surgery in five patients with cervical or endometrial cancer scheduled for surgical procedures that included pelvic LN dissection (Fig. 1). Details of these five cases are shown in Table 1. Forty-four LNs were SPIO/MRI-positive and 13 were radioisotope-positive. Of the 13 radioisotope-positive LNs, 12 (92%) were also SPIO/MRI-positive (Fig. 2A, B).
Table 1.
Case | Cancer | FIGO stage | RI-positive LN | SPIO-positive LN | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R | L | R | L | |||
1 | C | IB1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
2 | C | IB1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
3 | C | IB1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
4 | E | IA | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
5 | E | IA | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
total | 8 | 5 | 18 | 26 |
SPIO/MRI and iron staining
Dissected LNs from 15 patients who had undergone SPIO/MRI were subjected to iron staining (Fig. 3). Details of these patients are shown in Table 2. No adverse effects of SPIO injection were identified.
Table 2.
n | % | |
---|---|---|
Age, years (median) | 59 (31–76) | |
Cervical cancer | ||
IB1 | 3 | 20 |
Endometrial cancer | ||
IA | 6 | 40 |
IB | 2 | 13 |
IIIA | 1 | 7 |
IIIC2 | 2 | 13 |
IVB | 1 | 7 |
Days from SPIO injection to operation | ||
1 | 3 | 20 |
2 | 9 | 60 |
3 | 2 | 13 |
6 | 1 | 7 |
median: 2 | ||
median | range | |
Number of isolated LNs in each case | 38 | 20–49 |
Number of SPIO/MRI-positive LNs in each case | 7 | 0–15 |
Number of iron-stain-positive LNs in each case | 8 | 0–22 |
The pelvis was divided into left and right sides, and further into upper (aortic bifurcation to common iliac bifurcation) and lower pelvic LN areas (distal from common iliac bifurcation) (Fig. 4A). The ratios of SPIO/MRI-positive LNs were similar among these four areas (χ2, p = 0.31) (Fig. 4B). The ratios of iron stain-positive LNs were also similar among the four areas (χ2, p = 0.14) (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, LNs with the highest staining ratios were located in the upper pelvic area in 3/15 (20%) patients and 4/30 (13%) sides (Fig. 4D).
Sixty areas from 15 patients (left or right side, and upper or lower area) showed highly positive correlations between the number of SPIO/MRI-positive LNs and the total staining ratio in each area (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5).
Relationship between iron staining and sentinel LNs
The staining ratio was totalled and the findings shown as a heat map for 30 sides (left or right) of pelvis from 15 patients (Fig. 6A). The total staining ratio was ≥0.3% in 26/30 (87%) sides of the pelvis. Additionally, the SLN on at least one side was identified by iron staining in 14/15 (93%) cases.
There were LN metastases in five sides of the pelvis in four patients. Details of two (Sides A and B) are shown in Fig. 6B. There was a LN metastasis in Side A; the remainder of the LN was well-stained (staining ratio: 6.7%). Iron staining was strong except for within the metastasis, suggesting that it was an SLN. There was also a LN metastasis in Side B. Five iron stain-positive LNs were identified in paraffin sections, four of which were strongly positive (staining ratios: 19.0%, 12.8%, 12.1%, 8.3%), the other being weakly positive (staining ratio: 1.5%) and harbouring a metastasis. The LN with a metastasis showed weakly positive iron staining, whereas the nearby LNs were strongly stained, suggesting that this area contained the SLN. There were no iron stain-positive LNs in the other three sides of pelvis, or only one very weakly positive LN (staining ratio: 0.1%), and the LN harbouring a metastasis was negative for iron staining in these sides of pelvis. We concluded that LN metastasis may have impaired the lymph flow and disrupted the LN structure on affected sides of the pelvis.
Discussion
In this study, we injected radioisotope and SPIO into the cervixes of patients with uterine cancer and compared the results of SPECT/CT and SPIO/MRI. SPIO and the radioisotope were taken up similarly by LNs; however, SPIO was taken up by more LNs than the radioisotope, suggesting that using SPIO alone may achieve detection of many SLNs. The use of SPIO in combination with a dye or ICG may thus increase the detection sensitivity for SLNs. Further studies are needed to determine whether radioisotopes or SPIO are superior in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
In this study, we carried out iron staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded LNs to determine the uptake of SPIO qualitatively and quantitatively. We showed that SLNs could be identified pathologically, thus providing the first report of a pathological diagnosis by iron staining of LNs after administration of SPIO. It is often difficult to detect SLNs accurately and do rapid pathological examinations during surgery35,36; thus, postoperative evaluation of SLNs in permanent specimens may aid in making accurate pathological diagnoses. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reported objective and quantitative studies of retention time of SPIO in LNs after local injection. In the current study, SPIO was not washed out of the LNs. Even when the local injections had been administered several days before surgery, SPIO could still be detected by iron staining. Because our study cohort was small, further studies are needed; however, we can conclude that the schedule for administering SPIO could be relatively flexible in clinical practice.
There was a strong positive correlation between the number of SPIO/MRI-positive LNs and the total staining ratio, indicating that iron staining reflects preoperative SPIO uptake and that SLNs can be predicted by SPIO/MRI. Interestingly, SPIO/MRI and iron staining showed that SPIO was taken up by the upper (common iliac and sacral LNs) and lower pelvic LNs (internal and external iliac and obturator LNs) at comparable rates. However, in some cases SPIO was taken up more strongly by the upper than the lower pelvic LNs. In patients with uterine cancer, the SLNs are often the obturator and external iliac LNs37,38. However, lymph flow has sometimes been reported to run cephalad along the mesoureter and SLNs may thus include the common iliac LNs39,40. Our results indicate that upper pelvic LNs can become SLNs via this lymph flow, suggesting that it is important to search for both upper and lower pelvic LNs. Our results also suggest that more SLNs may have been detected in the lower pelvic LN because there are more LNs in this area; however, the rate of SLNs was the same in the upper and lower pelvic LNs.
We found metastases in LNs in five out of 30 sides (left or right) of the pelvis examined in 15 patients, including two sides with high total staining ratios and SLN metastasis. SLNs are more likely to occur in areas with SPIO/MRI- or iron stain-positive LNs. Pathological examination is thus recommended in the event of strongly positive iron staining. LN metastasis is known to disturb the lymph flow, sometimes preventing detection of SLNs14. In the current study, the three sides of the pelvis with negative or weak iron staining contained LN metastases; however, the SPIO and lymph flows may have been impaired by the tumour. Adequate LN dissection may thus be needed on any side of the pelvis in which no SPIO/MRI-positive LNs are detected and a pathological examination may be required on any side of pelvis with poor iron staining. This would confirm adequate LN dissection by checking SPIO/MRI-positive LNs and comparing the results of iron staining.
Three sides of the pelvis in two patients contained pathologically-confirmed LN metastases, including one patient with LN metastases on both sides of the pelvis who demonstrated SPIO/MRI- and iron stain-negative LNs and in whom SPECT/CT failed to detect any LN metastases. SPIO/MRI may thus be useful for diagnosing LN metastasis. However, in the patient with LN metastasis on only one side of the pelvis, the LN metastasis was in the upper area, and only one very weakly positive iron staining (staining ratio: 0.1%) LN was detected in the lower area. This side contained an SPIO/MRI-positive LN, possibly reflecting detection of very little iron uptake by MRI. Moreover, because LNs with micrometastases were positive for iron staining, it was not always possible to diagnose LN metastasis on the basis of contrast defects in SPIO/MRI, as in previous reports16.
Regarding limitations, this was a pilot study with a small number of cases; thus, further studies with larger numbers are needed to confirm the results. It is also necessary to determine how many days SPIO stays in SLNs. In addition, because patients in whom SLN biopsy is indicated often undergo endoscopic surgery, it is necessary to develop magnetic detectors that are suitable for use in this type of surgery. It is also necessary to examine further the possibility of identifying and removing the SLN alone to reduce overall LN dissection.
In conclusion, SPIO and radioisotopes are taken up similarly by SLNs in patients with uterine cancer. SPIO/MRI and iron staining may be useful techniques for identifying SLNs and diagnosing LN metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.
Materials and Methods
Patients
We enrolled patients with cervical or endometrial cancer who were scheduled for surgery, including pelvic LN dissection up to the aortic bifurcation, at Kindai University Hospital from February 2016 to March 2019, and who provided informed consent. Patients were excluded if they were under 20 years of age, did not provide consent, or had received preoperative chemotherapy. The expected sensitivity for identification of SLNs was assumed to be 80% and the threshold to be 50%. The sample size was calculated by setting the significance level to one side 0.05 and the power to 0.8; the required number of cases was 18. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kindai University Faculty of Medicine (26-206, 27-095) and registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000023607, date of registration; 12/08/2016). All research was performed in accordance with Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects.
SPIO injection
Ferucarbotran (Resovist; Fujifilm Toyama Chemical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) is intravenously administered at 0.45 mg/kg as iron when used as a contrast agent for MRI. In a preliminary study, when 10 mL of saline was added to 1.6 mL of ferucarbotran (total 11.6 mL, including 44.6 mg as iron) to produce almost the same amount as that used for intravenous administration and 6 mL (total 24.0 mg as iron) was injected into the uterine cervix, the cervix was too strongly enhanced and there was too much artefact (data not shown). Then, when ferucarbotran was administered in the same volume but in about half the concentration, the MRI images were fine with little artefact around the cervix and satisfactory imaging of LNs. Therefore, this amount was set as the dose in this study. Hence, 1.6 mL (including 44.6 mg as iron) was mixed with 20 mL saline to a total volume of 21.6 mL and administered several (1–6) days before surgery. Details of the days of administration are shown in Table 2. Cattelan 23 G needles were inserted into the subepithelium of the cervix (1, 5, 7, 11 o’clock), and 1.5 mL was injected smoothly through each needle.
SPIO/MRI protocol
Pre-SPIO images were constructed as described below. MRI was repeated 3 h after SPIO injection, after which post-SPIO images were constructed using the same protocol.
Images were obtained using a 1.5 T system (Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) with an HD 12-channel body array coil. T2-weighted axial images were obtained with the following parameters: repetition time, 3000 ms; time of echo, 75 ms; echo train length, 30; NEX, 2; matrix, 416 × 416; field of view, 270 mm; slice thickness, 5 mm; and number of acquisitions, 30. T2*-weighted axial images were obtained as follows: repetition time, 150 ms; time of echo, 17.9 ms; flip angle, 50°; matrix, 320×256; field of view, 280 mm; slice thickness, 5 mm; and number of acquisitions, 48. T2*-weighted sagittal images were obtained using the following parameters: repetition time, 150 ms; time of echo, 17.9 ms; flip angle, 30°; matrix, 320×250; field of view, 270 mm; slice thickness, 4 mm; and number of acquisitions, 34.
Radioisotope injection
99mTc (Techne Phytate Kit; Fujifilm Toyama Chemical Corporation) was injected on the day before surgery using the above-described technique with 0.2 mL (15 MBq) per needle (total 60 MBq 99mTc), with careful attention to exposure.
Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) protocol
SPECT/CT was performed every 30 min after radioisotope injection until hot LNs were detected on either side of the pelvis, or for a maximum of 2 h. The SPECT/CT system (Symbia T6; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) consists of a dual-head, variable-angle gamma camera equipped with low–medium energy general purpose collimators and a six-slice spiral CT scanner optimized for rapid rotation. SPECT acquisition (matrix, 128 × 128; 60 frames at 7 s/view) was performed using steps of 6°. CT scanning was performed in low-dose mode for attenuation correction and 5-mm slices were created. Iterative reconstruction (3D-ordered subset expectation maximization) was used to generate SPECT slices. SPECT images and CT axial slices were fused using an e-soft application package (Siemens) and hybrid SPECT/CT images were viewed using two-dimensional orthogonal re-slicing in axial orientation.
Iron staining
Paraffin-embedded sections (3 μm) of dissected LNs were deparaffinized, rinsed, and soaked in Berlin Blue (25 mL 2% potassium hexacyanoferrate [II] trihydrate; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and 25 mL hydrochloric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min. Specimens were rinsed again, and soaked in 0.1 g Nuclear Fast Red (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 100 mL heated aluminium sulphate 14-18 water (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) for 2 min, and then rinsed, dehydrated, permeated, and sealed.
Staining ratio
LN images were captured at ×12.5 or ×25 magnification according to the size of the LN using a microscope camera (Leica DMC2900; Leica Microsystems, Tokyo, Japan) and software (Leica Application Suite ver. 4.5; Leica Microsystems). Images were captured separately for large LNs so that the ranges did not overlap. The captured images were saved in JPEG format, imported to ImageJ34, and split into red, green, and blue. After binarizing the green images and adjusting the threshold, the area of the entire LN was measured. Images were then created by subtracting red from blue and the threshold adjusted so that the iron-stained blue area to be extracted became red. The area was measured and the ratio (%) of the iron-stained area to the total area of the LN determined and defined as the staining ratio.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism ver. 8.2.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The χ2 test and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. A probability (P) value of <0.05 was considered to denote statistical significance.
Acknowledgements
We thank Yamashita J. and Konishi T. for performing SPIO/MRI, Matano K. for radioisotope injection and SPECT/CT imaging, and Uesugi T. for iron staining. This study was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant Number 18K09241, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C for Ayako Suzuki), AMED (Grant Number JP18he0902006 for Masaki Sekino), and a Research Grant from Kindai University (Grant Number SR15 for Kosuke Murakami).
Author contributions
A.S. and M. Mandai conceptualized this study. K.M. and N.M. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. A.S., Y.K., and H.N. contributed to data acquisition. H.T. and K.M. performed the statistical analysis. M. Matsuki and T.S. contributed to quality control of data. All authors have reviewed this manuscript and read and approved the final version of it.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ferlay, J. et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int. J. Cancer144, 1941–1953 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297–303. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Frederick PJ, Straughn JM., Jr. The role of comprehensive surgical staging in patients with endometrial cancer. Cancer Control. 2009;16:23–29. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen SL, Iddings DM, Scheri RP, Bilchik AJ. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node analysis: current concepts and applications. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2006;56:292–309. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.5.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cervical Cancer (Version 4. 2019), https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf (2019).
- 6.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Uterine Neoplasms (Version 4. 2019). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf (2019).
- 7.Cormier B, et al. Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011;122:275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lecuru F, et al. Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:1686–1691. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ballester M, et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO) Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:469–476. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barlin JN, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012;125:531–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ruscito I, et al. Sentinel node mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer: indocyanine green versus other conventional dyes-A meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016;23:3749–3756. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5236-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rossi EC, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:384–392. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30068-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu Y, Li Z, Wu H, Yu J. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2013;1:1025–1030. doi: 10.3892/mco.2013.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kadkhodayan S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for lymph nodal staging of uterine cervix cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;41:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weissleder R, et al. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: an intravenous contrast agent for assessing lymph nodes with MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;175:494–498. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Motomura K, et al. SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastases in sentinel nodes localized by computed tomography lymphography in patients with breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2011;18:3422–3429. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1710-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harisinghani MG, et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:2491–2499. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pannu HK, Wang KP, Borman TL, Bluemke DA. MR imaging of mediastinal lymph nodes: evaluation using a superparamagnetic contrast agent. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2000;12:899–904. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<899::AID-JMRI13>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mack MG, Balzer JO, Straub R, Eichler K, Vogl TJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes. Radiology. 2002;222:239–244. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2221010225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Birkhauser FD, et al. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging facilitates detection of metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes of patients with bladder and prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2013;64:953–960. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koh DM, et al. Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings–initial observations. Radiology. 2004;231:91–99. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311030142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lahaye MJ, et al. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes? Radiology. 2009;252:81–91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2521081364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rockall AG, et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:2813–2821. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shiozawa M, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide and a magnetometer. Breast Cancer. 2013;20:223–229. doi: 10.1007/s12282-011-0327-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Douek M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014;21:1237–1245. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3379-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thill M, et al. The Central-European SentiMag study: sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope. Breast. 2014;23:175–179. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rubio IT, et al. The superparamagnetic iron oxide is equivalent to the Tc99 radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;41:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pinero-Madrona A, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide as a tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: A comparative non-inferiority study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;41:991–997. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karakatsanis A, et al. The Nordic SentiMag trial: a comparison of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles versus Tc99 and patent blue in the detection of sentinel node (SN) in patients with breast cancer and a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;157:281–294. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3809-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Houpeau JL, et al. Sentinel lymph node identification using superparamagnetic iron oxide particles versus radioisotope: The French Sentimag feasibility trial. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:501–507. doi: 10.1002/jso.24164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ghilli, M. et al. The superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer: a valid alternative in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer treatment. Eur. J. Cancer Care26, 10.1111/ecc.12385 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Karakatsanis A, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as the sole method for sentinel node biopsy detection in patients with breast cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2017;104:1675–1685. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Teshome M, et al. Use of a magnetic tracer for sentinel lymph node detection in early-stage breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016;23:1508–1514. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bats AS, et al. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011;123:230–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Slama J, Dundr P, Dusek L, Cibula D. High false negative rate of frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;129:384–388. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Niikura H, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection in early cervical cancer with combination 99mTc phytate and patent blue. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;94:528–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Niikura H, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;92:669–674. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ouldamer L, Marret H, Acker O, Barillot I, Body G. Unusual localizations of sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer: a review. Surg. Oncol. 2012;21:e153–e157. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bats AS, et al. The sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013;20:413–422. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2597-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]