Abstract
Reconstructing long-term continental temperature change provides the required counterpart to age equivalent marine records and can reveal how terrestrial and marine temperatures were related during times of extreme climate change such as the Miocene Climatic Optimum (MCO) and the following Middle Miocene Climatic Transition (MMCT). Carbonate clumped isotope temperatures (T(Δ47)) from 17.5 to 14.0 Ma Central European paleosols (Molasse Basin, Switzerland) display a temperature pattern during the MCO that is similar to coeval marine temperature records. Maximum temperatures in the long-term soil T(Δ47) record (at 16.5 and 14.9 Ma) lag maximum ocean bottom water temperatures, lead global ice volume, and mark the initiation of minimum global ice volume phases. The suggested onset of the MMCT, deduced by a marked and rapid decline in Molasse Basin soil temperatures is coeval with cooling reported in high-latitudinal marine records. This is best explained by a change in the seasonal timing of soil carbonate formation that was likely driven by a modification of rainfall seasonality and thus by a major reorganization of mid-latitude atmospheric circulation across Central Europe. In particular, our data suggest a strong climate coupling between the North Atlantic and Central Europe already in the middle Miocene.
Subject terms: Palaeoclimate, Geochemistry
Introduction
The middle Miocene marks an epoch of major global climatic and oceanographic change. The ca. 17 to 15 Ma warm period of the Miocene Climatic Optimum (MCO) interrupted long-term Cenozoic cooling, declining pCO2 levels and Antarctic ice sheet build-up1,2 and contrasts the subsequent middle Miocene Climate Transition (MMCT) that was marked by cooling of high and low latitudes, stabilization of Antarctic ice sheets, major sea level fall and marine biota overturn3–6. Long-term paleoclimate records document relatively low Miocene atmospheric CO2 concentrations7,8, but there is growing evidence for elevated and variable pCO2 levels of 350 to 630 ppm during the MCO global warm period9–13. The MCO may therefore share similarities in the magnitude of global change when compared to the present-day rise in global atmospheric pCO2, global temperature and decrease in polar ice volume.
In contrast to available marine records, quantitative continental paleoclimate records from the MCO and the subsequent MMCT are sparse, but essential for assessing past global climate change. Paleobotanical studies indicate warmer temperatures during the Langhian (15.97–13.65 Ma) when compared to the Serravallian (13.65–11.60 Ma) on local (e.g. Eastern/Central Paratethys14, Denmark15) and global scales16. Contradictory to the oceanic records, many Central European paleobotanical and mammalian fossil records seem to lack evidence for elevated mean annual temperatures (MAT) during the MCO17–20, but indicate decreased temperature seasonality due to elevated cold month temperatures19. Indirect evidence for elevated terrestrial temperatures comes from the migration of ectothermic vertebrates to Central Europe during the MCO21,22.
Here, we provide a paleosol clumped isotope (Δ47) temperature record of the North Alpine Foreland Basin (NAFB) that covers the critical time interval between ~18 and ~14 Ma. Soil development and pedogenic carbonate formation in overbank/floodplain environments in NAFB alluvial mega fans has been extensive, offering valuable insight into the paleoclimate history of central Europe23–26. Applying carbonate clumped isotope thermometry offers the unique opportunity to assess the effects of Miocene climate dynamics on mid-latitude continental temperatures in Central Europe and evaluate the interplay of long-term temperature and precipitation patterns during this time of major global climate change.
Approach and Results
The Fontannen/Napf (Switzerland) section sampled here is part of the Napf alluvial fan, one of the northern Alpine sedimentary mega fan systems consisting of alternating conglomerates and sandstones as well as mudstones with abundant, well-developed paleosols (Fig. 1)24,27,28. Individual pedogenic carbonate nodules from mature paleosols (Fig. 1C,D) were sampled along a magnetostratigraphically-dated section29, allowing the exact localization of each sample site within the paleomagnetic pattern, and analyzed for clumped isotope thermometry. The original magnetostratigraphy29 has been revised24,30, assigning the base of the section to chron 5Dr (17.533–17.717 Ma) and the youngest reversal to either chron 5ACr (14.163–14.070 Ma) or chron 5ABr (13.608–13.739 Ma; ages after ref. 31). Here, we follow the latter age model (chron 5ABr) as it yields a more conservative approach for the timing and duration of the temperature decline leading into the MMCT. We note that the alternative age model (assignment to chron 5ACr) is equally likely and thus report both models in Table 1 (for detailed analytical descriptions and further information see Material and Method section).
Table 1.
Sample | Ages | Alternative Ages | T(Δ47) | T(Δ47) 1σ SE | δ18Ocarbonate | δ18Osoil water | δ18Osoil water 1σ SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[Ma] | [Ma] | [°C] | [°C] | [‰, VSMOW] | [‰, VSMOW] | [‰, VSMOW] | |
MC 946 | 13.35 | 13.97 | 16.9 | 4.1 | 20.0 | −9.9 | 1.8 |
MC 956B | 14.13 | 14.36 | 12.7 | 1.3 | 19.7 | −11.2 | 0.6 |
MC 965B | 14.48 | 14.54 | 29.8 | 2.8 | 19.7 | −7.5 | 1.1 |
MC 961B | 14.93 | 14.93 | 35.1 | 2.9 | 20.4 | −5.8 | 1.1 |
MC 975A | 15.36 | 15.36 | 28.1 | 1.7 | 20.0 | −7.6 | 0.7 |
MC 981B | 15.82 | 15.82 | 24.4 | 1.4 | 19.2 | −9.1 | 0.6 |
MC 1011B | 16.38 | 16.38 | 23.4 | 2.9 | 19.5 | −9.1 | 1.2 |
MC 1003A | 16.46 | 16.46 | 28.6 | 4.1 | 19.9 | −7.6 | 1.6 |
MC 1001 | 16.59 | 16.59 | 30.6 | 2.1 | 19.8 | −7.3 | 0.8 |
MC 991B | 17.38 | 17.38 | 25.4 | 1.6 | 19.2 | −8.9 | 0.7 |
MC 987B | 17.61 | 17.61 | 22.4 | 3.8 | 19.1 | −9.7 | 1.6 |
Oxygen and carbon isotope data of the Fontannen section have previously been published23 (c.f. Table SI1, Fig. SI1 and in ref. 23). Oxygen isotope values (n = 114) of pedogenic carbonate nodules (δ18Ocarbonate) are rather constant throughout the section, averaging 19.8 ± 0.4 ‰ (range of 19.0 to 21.4 ‰) with slightly larger variability in the carbon isotope ratios (δ13Ccarbonate = −4.5 ± 1.0 ‰ (−7.0 to −1.9 ‰)). Carbonate clumped isotope (Δ47) values range between 0.647 ‰ and 0.703 ‰, translating into T(Δ47) temperatures of 35.1 °C to 12.7 °C (Table 1; Fig. 2A,C, Table SI.5). External standard errors (SE) for 4–5 replicate measurements range from ±0.002 ‰ to ±0.011 ‰ (0.9 °C to 4.1 °C). We note that 1 SE values < ~0.0040 ‰ (n = 4) and < ~0.0036 ‰ (n = 5) are below the shot noise limit32 of the mass spectrometric set-up (10 acquisitions, consisting of 10 cycles at 20 s integration time each, represent one replicate measurement). Therefore, whenever 1 SE of sample replicates was smaller than 0.0040 ‰, we used the higher shot noise limit of the mass spectrometer as error estimate.
Carbonate T(Δ47) at the base of the Fontannen section averages 23.9 ± 4.2 °C (17.61 Ma–17.38 Ma) and increases by ~5.5 °C reaching a first temperature maximum of 29.6 ± 4.6 °C (16.59 Ma–16.46 Ma; Fig. 2A). Subsequently, Δ47 temperatures decrease rapidly to 23.9 ± 3.3 °C (16.38 Ma - 15.82 Ma) before they attain a second maximum of 35.1 ± 2.9 °C at 14.93 Ma (mean T(Δ47) = 31.0 ± 4.4 °C between 15.4 Ma and 14.5 Ma). Samples younger than 14.5 Ma yield relatively cool temperatures of 12.7 ± 1.3 °C and 16.9 ± 4.1 °C (at 14.13 Ma and 13.35 Ma, respectively), averaging 14.8 ± 4.3 °C. Overall T(Δ47) shows warm temperatures (>~24 °C) for samples older than 14.5 Ma with two intervals of elevated temperatures (>~30 °C) at ~16.6 Ma and ~14.9 Ma (“peak warmth”, Figs. 2A and 3B,C). The most remarkable temperature change occurs after the second peak warmth when T(Δ47) values drop rapidly from 29.8 ± 2.8 °C (14.48 Ma) to 12.7 ± 1.3 °C (14.13 Ma). Thus, measured soil carbonate formation temperatures more than halved within less than ~350 ka (120 m of section). Applying the alternative age model (assignment to chron 5ACr) this temperature decrease would be even more rapid (less than ~180 ka).
Soil water δ18O values (δ18Osoil water), assuming oxygen isotope soil water-carbonate equilibrium were calculated using pairs of T(Δ47) and δ18Ocarbonate values and the oxygen isotope equilibrium fractionation equation of ref. 33 (updated by the acid fractionation factor of ref. 34). δ18Osoil water values range between −5.8 ± 1.1 ‰ and −11.2 ± 0.6 ‰ (Table 1, Fig. 2B). Since δ18Ocarbonate values do not exhibit large variability across the samples time interval δ18Osoil water values are mainly controlled by the ambient soil temperature. Pre-14.5 Ma δ18Osoil water values average −8.1 ± 1.2 ‰ and post-14.5 Ma average −10.6 ± 0.9 ‰, resulting in a decrease in δ18Osoil water values of −2.5 ± 1.3 ‰. The major temperature drop between 14.5 and 14.4 Ma is accompanied by a δ18Osoil water value change of −3.6 ± 1.2 ‰.
Discussion
Continental soil temperatures and their relation to marine records: MCO
Well-developed paleosol carbonate nodules are abundant throughout the NAFB Fontannen section (Fig. 1C,D; Fig. S1), thus, a lithological change is unlikely to account for the changes in measured soil temperatures. T(Δ47) values (12.7 ± 1.3 °C to 35.1 ± 2.9 °C) fall in the range of typical near-surface temperatures indicating that the nodular carbonate formed within the soil column and did not experience any diagenetic alteration and isotopic exchange. Calculated, moderate δ18Osoil water values concur with other regional δ18Owater reconstructions18,35,36 and permit to exclude strongly evaporitic conditions during carbonate formation due to shallow soil depths (Fig. 2). Absolute T(Δ47) are in line with other (semi-)quantitative Central European temperature records14,17–20,37–39 (Figs. 2A and 3C) but are now available at a temporal resolution that permits a comparison to marine temperature records. The paleosol T(Δ47) record of the Swiss Molasse reveals (1) a characteristic internal temperature structure with two MCO warming periods between 17.4 and 16.6 Ma as well as 15.4 and 14.9 Ma and (2) a very pronounced drop in T(Δ47) after 14.5 Ma (Figs. 2A and 3B,C). The two warming peaks with temperatures exceeding 30 °C are about 6 °C warmer than the already elevated MCO temperatures (~24 °C) and delimit the MCO in the Alpine foreland basin record to approximately 16.6 Ma and 14.9 Ma. The onset of the MCO is not clearly resolved due to a lack of data between 17.4 and 16.6 Ma and the exact termination dependent on the preferred age model. Cooling and transition into the MMCT, however, occurred after 14.5 Ma. Notwithstanding, the timing of central European warming agrees with the statistical analysis of a large suite of high-resolution marine oxygen isotope records that bracket the onset of the MCO at high latitudes between 17.4 and 16.9 Ma40. The passage into the MMCT is well reflected within the T(Δ47) data and cool soil temperatures were attained no later than 14.1 to 13.4 Ma, which concurs well with the reported range of the marine high-latitudinal MMCT40 (Fig. 3A–C).
The early stage of the MCO in Central Europe is characterized by a first T(Δ47) maximum at around 16.6–16.4 Ma. This warm phase correlates with evidence for a climatic optimum in NW-Europe at 16.5–16.3 Ma38 and the beginning of (1) increased benthic and bulk δ13C values after 16.7 Ma (Fig. 3I, paralleling the “Monterey excursion”)41–43, (2) decreased benthic δ18O values (δ18Obenthic) in the North Atlantic2,41 (Fig. 3E) and the low-latitudinal Pacific6,42–44 (Fig. 3F), as well as (3) increased pCO2 levels11,12 (Fig. SI2). Our terrestrial T(Δ47) maximum at ~16.6 Ma lags reconstructed maximum bottom water temperatures (BWT) at ~17.0 Ma by ~400 ka (Fig. 3G), but agrees with minimum sea water oxygen isotope ratios (δ18Osea water), indicative of minimum global ice volume45 (Fig. 3H). Following this first T(Δ47) peak, terrestrial temperatures remain low between 16.4 and 15.8 Ma, coinciding approximately with the Mi-2 δ18Obenthic maximum, a cooling interval with build-up of continental ice sheets46,47.
A second warming peak at 14.9 Ma occurs at the end of the MCO immediately before the transition into the MMCT. Warmest soil temperatures in Central Europe (~35 °C) at 14.9 Ma are in temporal agreement with decreased δ18Obenthic values41–44 (Fig. 3E,F), minimum δ18Osea water values45 (Fig. 3H), and elevated pCO29,12 (Fig. SI2). Maximum soil T(Δ47) (at ~14.9 Ma) lags the BWT maximum (at ~15.2 Ma) by ~300 ka (Fig. 3G) whereas TEX86 sea surface temperature (SST) reconstructions12 do not display discrete temperature peaks (Fig. 3D). Thus, we observe a consistent (within error of our age model of about ~100 ka) time lag of ~300–400 ka between maximum BWT and mid-latitudinal soil T(Δ47), which permits that deep-ocean heat uptake preceding atmospheric warming occurred during the middle Miocene.
Continental soil temperatures and their relation to marine records: MMCT
After 14.9 Ma, paleosol T(Δ47) decreases rapidly with a major temperature decline of ~17 °C occurring within less than ~350 ka (14.48–14.13 Ma; 120 m of section). This mid-latitude Central European cooling recorded in soil carbonates coincides with (1) the statistical onset of the MMCT (Fig. 3A; 14.94 ± 0.15 Ma for high-latitudes and 14.62 ± 0.21 Ma for low-latitudes40), (2) decreasing SSTs with earliest minimum SST values12 (Fig. 3D), (3) increasing δ18Obenthic values in the North Atlantic at ~14.45 Ma41 (Fig. 3E) and in the low-latitudinal Pacific (Fig. 3F). The latter is earlier and smaller compared to isotope event Mi-3b at ca. 13.9 Ma (global increase in δ18Obenthic values)47 and indicates a first high-latitudinal cooling step at ~14.7 Ma6,43 (Fig. 3I). Intital stages of European mid-latitude cooling are hence coeval with marine ice sheet advance in Antarctica (14.7–14.6 Ma)48, but precede major ice-sheet expansion in East Antarctica at ca. 13.9 Ma6,43,45.
Central European terrestrial T(Δ47) and marine proxy records indicate striking similarities over the course of the MCO and MMCT. We observe that the paleosol T(Δ47) record and δ18Obenthic records display the same double-peak structure (described as warming interrupted by global cooling at Mi-246,47) and note that BWT and δ18Osea water records (despite larger uncertainties) show similar trends. The Swiss NAFB paleosol record is hence sensitive to temperature change which may have acted as a driver for (polar) ice shield growth and decline and associated changes in δ18Osea water and hence δ18Obenthic values. When compared to ice volume-related changes in oceanic δ18Osea water values, our mid-latitude T(Δ47) record shows temperature peaks at 16.6 Ma and 14.9 Ma slightly before or at the beginning of δ18Osea water minima (i.e. minimum ice volume) at 16.6–15.9 Ma and 14.8–14.0 Ma, respectively45 (Fig. 3C,H). It is therefore possible that terrestrial peak warming was immediately followed by periods of major ice loss and minimum ice sheet extent. Consequently, δ18Osea water values attain maximum values (corresponding to maximum ice volume) at ~15.4 Ma, following a phase of cooler terrestrial temperatures (16.4–15.8 Ma) and at ~13.8 Ma, following the major soil T(Δ47) decline between 14.5 and 14.1 Ma. Collectively, these Δ47 data suggest a time lag between terrestrial cooling and (re-)appearance of major ice sheets (on the order of several 100 ka). Despite the diachronous behavior of (marine) localities at different latitudes40, as well as dating uncertainties, we observe, however, that (terrestrial) temperatures (1) lag reconstructed BWT by ~300–400 ka, (2) lead maximum global ice volume, and (3) mark the initiation of minimum global ice volume phases.
Magnitude of post-MCO mid-latitude cooling and paleorainfall patterns
The paleosol temperatures analyzed here show middle Miocene temperature characteristics with overall warming interrupted by Mi-2 cooling and a pronounced decline in T(Δ47) at the transition into the MMCT (Fig. 3C). The magnitude of the temperature decrease after 14.5 Ma (~17 °C) is large when compared to the change in temperature known from deep-sea records (1 °C to 6 °C)1,12,42,45,48. This amplification of terrestrial temperature change is in itself not surprising; yet the overall magnitude needs particular consideration. The few existing studies of terrestrial MMCT cooling report a minor (1–3 °C)39,49, often gradual long-term decrease in temperature19,50 or inferred the magnitude of continental temperature decrease by the extinction of temperature-sensitive vertebrates, such as alligators, chameleons and giant turtles (~7 °C at ~14–13 Ma)21. Assuming a MAT decrease of ~7 °C during the transition into the MMCT in Central Europe21 would require a residual decrease of ca. 10 °C based on the total change in Δ47 soil temperatures. We propose that a shift in the seasonality of soil carbonate formation simultaneously with global cooling across the transition into the MMCT best explains the large (~17 °C) and rapid (~350 ka) decrease in Δ47 soil temperatures. Carbonate formation seasonality is indirectly related to regional climate change as both precipitation amount and seasonality as well as temperature and evapotranspiration (driven by temperature and wind speed) affect soil drying, which is the main driver in forcing pedogenic carbonate formation51,52. As a consequence, recorded Δ47 temperatures can be shifted to warmer or cooler periods of the year by changing the prevailing carbonate formation (i.e. dry) season53–55.
Other possible mechanisms to increase recorded soil temperatures during the MCO, despite changing ambient temperatures, include a shallowing in soil carbonate formation depth or an increase in temperature seasonality during the MCO warm period with “warmer than average” warm month mean temperatures (WMMT). A shift towards shallower carbonate formation depths56 and corresponding less dampened warm (summer) temperatures during the MCO and maximally dampened (approaching MATs) temperatures during the MMCT may (at least partly) account for the large magnitude of the MCO-MMCT temperature change. However, such a shift in soil carbonate formation depth would have to be linked to the prevailing rainfall regime57, which in turn argues again for a change in rainfall seasonality and thus in carbonate formation seasonality. The latter has been investigated for the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum, but only a maximum increase of WMMT of ~4 °C has been found for the warmest period in the Cenozoic based on carbonate clumped isotopes and paleofloral analysis58. Paleoclimate modelling of the middle Miocene suggest increased temperature seasonality over Europe with slightly warmer summer temperatures over central Europe (~+2 – +4 °C), but reduced winter temperatures (~-2 – −4 °C) compared to control runs59,60. Modelled ground temperatures61, extracted for the paleogeographic position of the Fontannen section (see Supporting Information SI1.4), show seasonal temperature changes of 16 °C (summer/JJA minus winter/DJF), which is surprisingly similar to our observed temperature changes. However, absolute temperatures are significantly cooler with a MAT of 11.6 °C and a summer (JJA) temperature of 19.6 °C (Fig. SI3), largely underestimating local proxy-based temperatures (T Δ47 (this study) and paleoflora data14,17,19,20,50). Middle Miocene climate modelling indicates that the deduced soil carbonate temperature swings are in a reasonable range, but further suggests that they might reflect a shift from summer to winter temperatures (full shift of the season), rather than a shift from summer to mean annual formation of carbonate (Fig. SI3).
We cannot fully quantify the individual contributions of temperature seasonality, soil formation depth and changes in carbonate formation seasonality to the detected magnitude of T(Δ47) decrease after 14.9 Ma but suggest that carbonate formation seasonality contributed importantly to the recorded T(Δ47) decrease during the transition into the MMCT. The large magnitude change towards cooler Δ47 soil temperatures suggests that the seasonality of carbonate formation either shifted away from summer months to spring/fall or broadened in duration (now including summer and “non-summer” seasons). As the T(Δ47) values presented here are consistent with Central European paleobotanical-based WMMT during the MCO and correspond to mean annual temperatures (MAT) during the MMCT14,17,19,20,50 as well as modelled MATs59–65 (Figs. 2A and 3C), we propose that MCO Δ47 temperatures from the Swiss NAFB reflect summer temperatures exclusively and that a change in rainfall seasonality and thus soil carbonate formation seasonality played an important role in determining T(Δ47) values during the MMCT.
The ubiquitous presence of soil carbonates in the Swiss Molasse basin under consistently “wet” MCO conditions (precipitation amounts of ~830–1350 mm/a)17,19,28,66,67 argues for pronounced rainfall seasonality in Europe with temporal soil drying and pedogenic carbonate formation. This concurs with paleoclimate modeling studies indicating increased (summer) rainfall amounts during the MCO59,60,65. Whereas relative humidity is highest during the summer months in the model runs reflecting MCO conditions61, the soil water content is largely reduced, thus supporting soil carbonate formation (Fig. SI3). Overall, during the MCO, carbonate formation in summer months was likely driven by wet-dry cycling under relatively wet conditions with high summer temperatures supporting soil carbonate formation. After the MCO, paleorainfall data indicate a general trend towards decreased rainfall amounts17,19,28,66,67 and the development of a summer peak in precipitation across Central Europe67. The transition to cool T(Δ47) values hence may result from summers that became too wet and too “cold” for further supporting soil carbonate formation exclusively during summer month, meanwhile a general decrease of rainfall amounts promotes carbonate formation in other than summer months. Alternatively, a general aridification (contemporaneous with global cooling after the MCO)3 could have broadened the interannual time interval for carbonate formation, being no longer restricted to warm months (as before under wet MCO conditions). Both explanations are in line with decreasing δ18Osoil water values at the end of the MCO (Table 1), as summer rainfall δ18O values are typically higher when compared to non-summer rainfall values68.
Changing precipitation amount and seasonality over Central Europe at the onset of the MMCT requires profound reorganization of atmospheric circulation in conjunction with global temperature change. A general poleward shift of the Hadley circulation has been predicted for the MCO60 and it has been hypothesized that trade winds (northeasterlies)22 or even easterly winds along the Alpine chain69,70 were dominating Central Europe during the middle Miocene. If (north-)easterly winds have been prevailing during the middle Miocene22,69,70, such air mass presumably brought moist air from the Paratethys mainly during the summer month69. With decreasing temperature and/or retreat of the Paratethys, the Central European climate likely became more continental39,71 and increased influence of the westerlies may have increased winter precipitation of the Molasse Basin. Alternatively or even in conjunction, more northern trade winds may have been efficiently blocked along the Miocene Alps, forcing major rainout of moisture-bearing air masses during rainy season(s)72. As soil temperatures show that Central Europe experienced major cooling and the meridional temperature gradient increased across the MMCT3, this trade wind zone may have shrunk to more southern latitudes, now allowing westerlies to be the prevailing winds in Europe. These orogen-parallel winds would not have been as efficiently blocked by the Alps as north-south oriented winds and as a result may have led to reduced precipitation close to the Alpine orogenic front and generally drier conditions (contemporaneous with global aridification). Thus, with the disappearance of the trade winds (northeasterlies), the westerly-dominated wind regime over Central Europe might have been established since ~14.5 Ma, about 3 Ma earlier than previously reported73.
Our Swiss Molasse paleosol temperature record shows that mid-latitude continental Europe was not only comparably affected by middle Miocene climate dynamics as the global oceans, but experienced profound changes in temperature and possibly in rainfall patterns (seasonality) within a brief time interval, underlining the sensitivity of continental climates to global changes.
Conclusions
The NAFB paleosol T(Δ47) shows two warming peaks (>30 °C) that are bracketing the MCO with warm season temperatures typically >24 °C. The onset of the MMCT is characterized by a major rapid soil temperature (−17 °C) and δ18Osoil water (−3.6 ‰) decrease within less than 350 ka (14.48–14.13 Ma) after peak MCO temperatures at ~14.9 Ma. The terrestrial temperature record displays a double-peak temperature structure strikingly similar to marine records, revealing marine isotope events Mi-2 and Mi-3a47 in the terrestrial NAFB record. Compared to global ice volume and BWT records45, peak soil T(Δ47) lags reconstructed maximum BWTs by ~300–400 ka, likely leads maximum global ice volume (by several 100 ka), and marks the initiation of minimum global ice volume phases. Cooler soil temperatures are attained at ~14.1 Ma contemporaneous with Mi-3a and decreased North Atlantic SSTs12 and δ18Obenthic values41, indicating a strong coupling between the North Atlantic and Central European climate already in the middle Miocene.
In combination with paleofloral and fossil data, we infer that the NAFB was dominated by warm and wet climates during the MCO, but with pronounced wet-dry cycling to allow soil carbonate formation. These observations are consistent with other global warming intervals such as the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum or the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, showing the intensification of the hydrologic cycle during warm periods53,74,75. The large and rapid shifts of Δ47 temperatures and soil water δ18O values argue for a change in the seasonality of soil carbonate formation that concurred with the onset of global cooling at the MMCT. This implies a modification of rainfall seasonality and thus a major reorganization in atmospheric circulation across Central Europe.
Method and Materials
Clumped isotope analyses
Carbonate clumped isotope temperatures (T(Δ47)), a proxy for soil carbonate formation temperatures, have been measured at the Goethe University - Senckenberg BiK-F Joint Stable Isotope Facility Frankfurt (Germany) according to analytical outlines provided by ref. 76 and ref. 77. Each sample was measured with at least 4 replicates and each day 2–3 carbonate reference materials were measured alongside with sample unknowns. Temperatures are calculated using the calibration of ref. 76. Replicates over the entire analytical period (2013 to 2017) provided identical Δ47 values (within the standard error of each measurement). Analytical details and carbonate reference materials are provided in the Supporting Information (SI1 and Tables S1–S5).
Paleosols in the north alpine foreland basin
As the westernmost extension of the former Paratethys, the NAFB formed as a consequence of Alpine convergence. After deposition of Eocene to early Oligocene deep marine flysch sediments in the central part of the NAFB, Oligocene to middle Miocene (~32 to 11 Ma) sedimentation in the Swiss Molasse Basin is characterized by two large-scale coarsening-upward cycles with alternating shallow marine to freshwater/alluvial conditions24,27,30. The second coarsening-upward cycle, the transgression of the Upper Marine Molasse (OMM) and the transition to the terrestrial Upper Freshwater Molasse (OSM), resulted in the deposition of a roughly 100-m-thick succession of coarse alluvial conglomerates, fluvial sandstones and marls during the early to late Miocene. At ~17 Ma a fully terrestrial depositional system had developed with basin-axial, west-directed drainage systems. In the proximal part of the basin, close to the northern Alpine thrust front, large alluvial fan systems deposited south-derived sediments indicative of a northward drainage system (Fig. 1)24,27,28. The Fontannen/Napf (Switzerland) section sampled here is part of the Napf alluvial mega fan system, consisting of alternating conglomerates and sandstones as well as mudstones with abundant well-developed paleosols.
The Napf section has been dated by a combination of high-resolution magnetostratigraphy and biostratigraphy using micro-mammal faunas29. The original magnetostratigraphy has been partly revised24,30. Both revised versions assign the base of the section to Chron 5Dr (17.533–17.717 Ma; ages based on ref. 31) and the base of the youngest normal to chron 5ADn, but suggest different correlations of the youngest reversal: The youngest reversal can be correlated either to chron 5ABr (13.608–13.739 Ma) or to chron 5ACr (14.070–14.163 Ma)24,30. Assigning the youngest reversal of the section to chron 5ABr has been preferred by ref. 30, but the alternative age model is equally possible, because the uppermost micromammal fauna in the sections fauna places the top of the section only slightly above the Nördlinger Ries impact event (~14.81 Ma)78 and rather resembles MN5/MN6 (MN5: ~16.4–14.2 Ma, MN6: ~14.2–13.1/12.6 Ma) (not MN7/8: ~13.8(?)/13.1–11.2 Ma)24. Thus, we report both age models in Table 1, but only discuss the published age model, as it is the more conservative age constraint for describing the observed temperature shifts (minimum duration). Individual pedogenic carbonate nodules from mature paleosols were sampled along the same magnetostratigraphic section29, allowing the exact localization of each sample site within the magnetic pattern. The ages at the base and the top of each magnetozone are assigned to the middle distance between two juxtaposed sample sites of changed magnetic polarity. For samples that fall into one single magnetic pattern (i.e. between two assigned ages), the age constraints are based on a linear sedimentation rate. The uncertainty on the age determination corresponds to the sample spacing, which is on average 21.1 m (median 6.3 m) and translates into ~99 ka (~29 ka) using an average sedimentation rate of 0.21 mm/a, but varies with individual sample spacing and sedimentation rate within each chronozone.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This is a contribution to DFG-SPP 2017 4D-MB. We acknowledge support through DFG ME 4955/1–1 (KM), MU 2845/6–1 (AM) and DFG FI 948/4-1 (JF). We thank F. Schlunegger (Bern) for field support and reassessing the age model and S. Hofmann (Frankfurt) and Matthew Forrest (Frankfurt) for technical assistance.
Author contributions
K.M. and A.M. designed the study and composed the paper. K.M. and N.L. analyzed the samples and the results with advice and assistance from J.F. and A.M.; M.C. and O.K. provided sample material and regional geological knowledge. All authors edited the final version of this manuscript.
Data availability
All supporting datasets are available as Supplementary Information files that will be freely accessible on nature.com upon publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-64743-5.
References
- 1.Shevenell AE, Kennett JP, Lea DW. Middle Miocene ice sheet dynamics, deep-sea temperatures, and carbon cycling: A Southern Ocean perspective. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 2008;9:Q02006. doi: 10.1029/2007GC001736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wright JD, Miller KG, Fairbanks RG. Early and Middle Miocene stable isotopes: Implications for Deepwater circulation and climate. Paleoceanography. 1992;7:357–389. doi: 10.1029/92PA00760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Flower BP, Kennett JP. The middle Miocene climatic transition: East Antarctic ice sheet development, deep ocean circulation and global carbon cycling. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 1994;108:537–555. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(94)90251-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Foster GL, Rohling EJ. Relationship between sea level and climate forcing by CO2 on geological timescales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110:1209–1214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216073110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Holbourn A, Kuhnt W, Clemens S, Prell W, Andersen N. Middle to late Miocene stepwise climate cooling: Evidence from a high‐resolution deep water isotope curve spanning 8 million years. Paleoceanography. 2013;28:688–699. doi: 10.1002/2013PA002538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Holbourn A, et al. Middle Miocene climate cooling linked to intensification of eastern equatorial Pacific upwelling. Geology. 2014;42:19–22. doi: 10.1130/g34890.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pagani M, Arthur MA, Freeman KH. Miocene evolution of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Paleoceanography. 1999;14:273–292. doi: 10.1029/1999PA900006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pagani M, Zachos JC, Freeman KH, Tipple B, Bohaty S. Marked Decline in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations During the Paleogene. Science. 2005;309:600–603. doi: 10.1126/science.1110063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Foster GL, Lear CH, Rae JWB. The evolution of pCO2, ice volume and climate during the middle Miocene. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2012;341–344:243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Greenop R, Foster GL, Wilson PA, Lear CH. Middle Miocene climate instability associated with high-amplitude CO2 variability. Paleoceanography. 2014;29:845–853. doi: 10.1002/2014PA002653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kürschner WM, Kvaček Z, Dilcher DL. The impact of Miocene atmospheric carbon dioxide fluctuations on climate and the evolution of terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:449–453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708588105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Super JR, et al. North Atlantic temperature and pCO2 coupling in the early-middle Miocene. Geology. 2018;46:519–522. doi: 10.1130/G40228.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sosdian SM, et al. Constraining the evolution of Neogene ocean carbonate chemistry using the boron isotope pH proxy. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2018;498:362–376. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ivanov D, et al. Miocene vegetation and climate dynamics in Eastern and Central Paratethys (Southeastern Europe) Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2011;304:262–275. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Larsson LM, et al. Miocene climate evolution of northern Europe: A palynological investigation from Denmark. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2011;309:161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pound MJ, Haywood AM, Salzmann U, Riding JB. Global vegetation dynamics and latitudinal temperature gradients during the Mid to Late Miocene (15.97–5.33 Ma) Earth-Sci Rev. 2012;112:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Böhme M, Bruch AA, Selmeier A. The reconstruction of Early and Middle Miocene climate and vegetation in Southern Germany as determined from the fossil wood flora. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2007;253:91–114. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Héran M-A, Lécuyer C, Legendre S. Cenozoic long-term terrestrial climatic evolution in Germany tracked by δ 18 O of rodent tooth phosphate. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2010;285:331–342. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.11.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mosbrugger V, Utescher T, Dilcher DL. Cenozoic continental climatic evolution of Central Europe. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:14964–14969. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505267102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Utescher T, Bondarenko OV, Mosbrugger V. The Cenozoic Cooling – continental signals from the Atlantic and Pacific side of Eurasia. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2015;415:121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Böhme M. The Miocene Climatic Optimum: evidence from ectothermic vertebrates of Central Europe. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2003;195:389–401. doi: 10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00367-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Böhme M. Migration history of air-breathing fishes reveals Neogene atmospheric circulation patterns. Geology. 2004;32:393–396. doi: 10.1130/g20316.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Campani M, Mulch A, Kempf O, Schlunegger F, Mancktelow N. Miocene paleotopography of the Central Alps. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2012;337–338:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kälin D, Kempf O. High-resolution stratigraphy from the continental record of the Middle Miocene Northern Alpine Foreland Basin of Switzerland. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen. 2009;254:177–235. doi: 10.1127/0077-7749/2009/0010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Platt NH, Keller B. Distal alluvial deposits in a foreland basin setting—the Lower Freshwater Miocene), Switzerland: sedimentology, architecture and palaeosols. Sedimentology. 1992;39:545–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1992.tb02136.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schlunegger F, Rieke-Zapp D, Ramseyer K. Possible environmental effects on the evolution of the Alps-Molasse Basin system. Swiss j geosci. 2007;100:383–405. doi: 10.1007/s00015-007-1238-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schlunegger, F., Matter, A., Burbank, D. W. & Klaper, E. M. Magnetostratigraphic constraints on relationships between evolution of the central Swiss Molasse basin and Alpine orogenic events. Geol Soc Am Bull109, 225–241, 10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0225:mcorbe>2.3.co;2 (1997).
- 28.Kuhlemann J, Kempf O. Post-Eocene evolution of the North Alpine Foreland Basin and its response to Alpine tectonics. Sedimentary Geology. 2002;152:45–78. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00285-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schlunegger F, Burbank D, Matter A, Engesser B, Modden C. Magnetostratigraphic calibration of the Oligocence to Middle Miocene (30-15 Ma) mammal biozones and depositional sequences of the Swiss Molasse basin. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 1996;89:753–788. doi: 10.5169/seals-167923. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kempf, O., Bolliger, T., Kälin, D., Engesser, B. & Matter, A. New magnetostratigraphic calibration of Early to Middle Miocene mammal biozones of the North Alpine foreland basin. Mémoires et travaux de l’Institut de Montpellier, 547–561, (1997).
- 31.Hilgen, F. J. et al. In The Geologic Time Scale 923–978 (Elsevier, 2012).
- 32.Merritt DA, Hayes JM. Factors Controlling Precision and Accuracy in Isotope-Ratio-Monitoring Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1994;66:2336–2347. doi: 10.1021/ac00086a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim S-T, O’Neil JR. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium oxygen isotope effects in synthetic carbonates. Geochim Cosmochim Ac. 1997;61:3461–3475. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00169-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim S-T, Mucci A, Taylor BE. Phosphoric acid fractionation factors for calcite and aragonite between 25 and 75 C: revisited. Chem Geol. 2007;246:135–146. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kocsis L, Vennemann TW, Fontignie D. Migration of sharks into freshwater systems during the Miocene and implications for Alpine paleoelevation. Geology. 2007;35:451–454. doi: 10.1130/g23404a.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tütken T, Vennemann TW, Janz H, Heizmann EPJ. Palaeoenvironment and palaeoclimate of the Middle Miocene lake in the Steinheim basin, SW Germany: A reconstruction from C, O, and Sr isotopes of fossil remains. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2006;241:457–491. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bruch AA, Uhl D, Mosbrugger V. Miocene climate in Europe—patterns and evolution: a first synthesis of NECLIME. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2007;253:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Donders TH, et al. Strong climate coupling of terrestrial and marine environments in the Miocene of northwest Europe. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2009;281:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.02.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Harzhauser M, Piller WE, Müllegger S, Grunert P, Micheels A. Changing seasonality patterns in Central Europe from Miocene Climate Optimum to Miocene Climate Transition deduced from the Crassostrea isotope archive. Global Planet Change. 2011;76:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mudelsee M, Bickert T, Lear CH, Lohmann G. Cenozoic climate changes: A review based on time series analysis of marine benthic δ18O records. Rev Geophys. 2014;52:333–374. doi: 10.1002/2013RG000440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Diester‐Haass, L. et al. Mid Miocene paleoproductivity in the Atlantic Ocean and implications for the global carbon cycle. Paleoceanography24 (2009).
- 42.Holbourn A, Kuhnt W, Kochhann KGD, Andersen N, Meier KJS. Global perturbation of the carbon cycle at the onset of the Miocene Climatic Optimum. Geology. 2015;43:123–126. doi: 10.1130/g36317.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kochhann KGD, et al. Eccentricity pacing of eastern equatorial Pacific carbonate dissolution cycles during the Miocene Climatic Optimum. Paleoceanography. 2016;31:1176–1192. doi: 10.1002/2016PA002988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tian J, Yang M, Lyle MW, Wilkens R, Shackford JK. Obliquity and long eccentricity pacing of the Middle Miocene climate transition. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 2013;14:1740–1755. doi: 10.1002/ggge.20108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lear CH, et al. Neogene ice volume and ocean temperatures: Insights from infaunal foraminiferal Mg/Ca paleothermometry. Paleoceanography. 2015;30:1437–1454. doi: 10.1002/2015PA002833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miller KG, Wright JD, Fairbanks RG. Unlocking the ice house: Oligocene Miocene oxygen isotopes, eustasy, and margin erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 1991;96:6829–6848. doi: 10.1029/90JB02015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miller KG, Mountain GS. Drilling and dating New Jersey Oligocene-Miocene sequences: Ice volume, global sea level, and Exxon records. Science. 1996;271:1092–1095. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5252.1092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Levy, R. et al. Antarctic ice sheet sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 variations in the early to mid-Miocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, 3453–3458, 10.1073/pnas.1516030113 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Kürschner WM, Kvacek Z. Oligocene-Miocene CO2 fluctuations, climatic and palaeofloristic trends inferred from fossil plant assemblages in central Europe. Bulletin of Geosciences. 2009;84:189–202. doi: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jiménez-Moreno G, Fauquette S, Suc J-P. Vegetation, climate and palaeoaltitude reconstructions of the Eastern Alps during the Miocene based on pollen records from Austria, Central Europe. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:1638–1649. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01911.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Breecker DO, Sharp ZD, McFadden LD. Seasonal bias in the formation and stable isotopic composition of pedogenic carbonate in modern soils from central New Mexico, USA. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2009;121:630–640. doi: 10.1130/b26413.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zamanian K, Pustovoytov K, Kuzyakov Y. Pedogenic carbonates: Forms and formation processes. Earth-Sci Rev. 2016;157:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Methner K, et al. Rapid Middle Eocene temperature change in western North America. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2016;450:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.05.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peters NA, Huntington KW, Hoke GD. Hot or not? Impact of seasonally variable soil carbonate formation on paleotemperature and O-isotope records from clumped isotope thermometry. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2013;361:208–218. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ringham MC, Hoke GD, Huntington KW, Aranibar JN. Influence of vegetation type and site-to-site variability on soil carbonate clumped isotope records, Andean piedmont of Central Argentina (32–34°S) Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2016;440:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Quade J, Eiler J, Daëron M, Achyuthan H. The clumped isotope geothermometer in soil and paleosol carbonate. Geochim Cosmochim Ac. 2013;105:92–107. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.11.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Retallack GJ. Pedogenic carbonate proxies for amount and seasonality of precipitation in paleosols. Geology. 2005;33:333–336. doi: 10.1130/g21263.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hyland EG, Huntington KW, Sheldon ND, Reichgelt T. Temperature seasonality in the North American continental interior during the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. Clim. Past. 2018;14:1391–1404. doi: 10.5194/cp-14-1391-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Henrot AJ, et al. Effects of CO2, continental distribution, topography and vegetation changes on the climate at the Middle Miocene: a model study. Clim. Past. 2010;6:675–694. doi: 10.5194/cp-6-675-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Herold N, Huber M, Müller RD. Modeling the Miocene Climatic Optimum. Part I: Land and Atmosphere*. Journal of Climate. 2011;24:6353–6372. doi: 10.1175/2011JCLI4035.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhou H, Helliker BR, Huber M, Dicks A, Akçay E. C4 photosynthesis and climate through the lens of optimality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115:12057–12062. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718988115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.You, Y., Huber, M., Müller, R., Poulsen, C. & Ribbe, J. Simulation of the middle Miocene climate optimum. Geophys Res Lett36, 10.1029/2008GL036571 (2009).
- 63.Goldner A, Herold N, Huber M. The challenge of simulating the warmth of the mid-Miocene climatic optimum in CESM1. Clim Past. 2014;10:523–536. doi: 10.5194/cp-10-523-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Knorr, G., Butzin, M., Micheels, A. & Lohmann, G. A warm Miocene climate at low atmospheric CO2 levels. Geophys Res Lett 38, n/a-n/a, 10.1029/2011GL048873 (2011).
- 65.Henrot AJ, et al. Middle Miocene climate and vegetation models and their validation with proxy data. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2017;467:95–119. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Böhme M, Winklhofer M, Ilg A. Miocene precipitation in Europe: Temporal trends and spatial gradients. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2011;304:212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.09.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bruch AA, Utescher T, Mosbrugger V. Precipitation patterns in the Miocene of Central Europe and the development of continentality. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2011;304:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rozanski, K., Araguás-Araguás, L. & Gonfiantini, R. in Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records, 1–36 (American Geophysical Union, 1993).
- 69.Rocholl A, Schaltegger U, Gilg HA, Wijbrans J, Böhme M. The age of volcanic tuffs from the Upper Freshwater Molasse (North Alpine Foreland Basin) and their possible use for tephrostratigraphic correlations across Europe for the Middle Miocene. Int J Earth Sci. 2018;107:387–407. doi: 10.1007/s00531-017-1499-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lukács R, et al. Early to Mid-Miocene syn-extensional massive silicic volcanism in the Pannonian Basin (East-Central Europe): Eruption chronology, correlation potential and geodynamic implications. Earth-Sci Rev. 2018;179:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ramstein G, Fluteau F, Besse J, Joussaume S. Effect of orogeny, plate motion and land–sea distribution on Eurasian climate change over the past 30 million years. Nature. 1997;386:788–795. doi: 10.1038/386788a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Costeur L, Legendre S. Mammalian communities document a latitudinal environmental gradient during the Miocene Climatic Optimum in Western Europe. PALAIOS. 2008;23(5):280–288. doi: 10.2110/palo.2006.p06-092r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Quan C, Liu Y-S, Tang H, Utescher T. Miocene shift of European atmospheric circulation from trade wind to westerlies. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:5660. doi: 10.1038/srep05660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bowen GJ, Beerling DJ, Koch PL, Zachos JC, Quattlebaum T. A humid climate state during the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum. Nature. 2004;432:495–499. doi: 10.1038/nature03115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mulch A, et al. Rapid change in high-elevation precipitation patterns of western North America during the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (MECO) Am J Sci. 2015;315:317–336. doi: 10.2475/04.2015.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wacker U, et al. Empirical calibration of the clumped isotope paleothermometer using calcites of various origins. Geochim Cosmochim Ac. 2014;141:127–144. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fiebig J, et al. Slight pressure imbalances can affect accuracy and precision of dual inlet-based clumped isotope analysis. Isot Environ Healt S. 2016;52:12–28. doi: 10.1080/10256016.2015.1010531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Schmieder M, Kennedy T, Jourdan F, Buchner E, Reimold WU. A high-precision 40Ar/39Ar age for the Nördlinger Ries impact crater, Germany, and implications for the accurate dating of terrestrial impact events. Geochim Cosmochim Ac. 2018;220:146–157. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ivanov DA, Ashraf AR, Mosbrugger V. Late Oligocene and Miocene climate and vegetation in the Eastern Paratethys area (northeast Bulgaria), based on pollen data. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2007;255:342–360. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All supporting datasets are available as Supplementary Information files that will be freely accessible on nature.com upon publication.