Abstract
Background
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common chromosomal abnormal heart disease. The pathophysiological mechanism of HCM is complex. Several studies have suggested that the level of Soluble ST2 (sST2) may be a biomarker of chronic systolic heart failure, however, the role of sST2 in HCM remains unclear. So we performed this study to analyze the role of Soluble ST2 (sST2), Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and its correlations with clinical prognosis of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) undergoing ventricular septal myectomy.
Methods
HCM patients who underwent modified Morrow surgery in our hospital during June 2016-June 2018 were included. We divided the patients into different groups stratified by sST2 and Gal-3 level. Besides, we included volunteers without heart disease for medical examination as normal controls. Biochemical analyses were conducted to identify the biomarkers difference. The predictive value of sST2 and Gal-3 on all-cause mortality was evaluated with Cox regression analysis.
Results
A total of 125 HCM patients were included in this present study. The sST2 and Gal-3 levels in HCM patients were significantly higher than that in control group (all P<0.001); there were significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality for HCM patients stratified by the sST2 and Gal-3 level; Cox univariate regression survival analysis showed that the hypertension (HR =1.19, 95% CI: 1.01–1.38), maximum wall thickness (HR =1.48, 95% CI: 1.04–1.98), Log sST2 (HR =1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05), Log Gal-3 (HR =1.17, 95% CI: 1.09–1.32) were the predictors for all-cause mortality in patients with HCM, and Cox multivariate risk regression showed that maximum wall thickness was the independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HCM (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.35–1.97).
Conclusions
Even through sST2 and Gal-3 were not associated with clinical prognosis of patients with HCM undergoing ventricular septal myectomy, it may be involved in the progress of HCM, more studies are warranted to identify the potential mechanism and reverence value.
Keywords: Soluble ST2 (sST2), Galectin-3 (Gal-3), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), correlation
Introduction
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common chromosomal abnormal heart disease with an incidence of about 1:500 (1). It is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in adolescents and athletes, and it’s also a risk factor for heart failure and stroke (2,3). The pathophysiological mechanism of HCM is complex with regards to that the genotype, clinical phenotype and prognosis are highly heterogeneous. The clinical features of HCM include asymmetric left atrial hypertrophy, abnormal myocardial energy metabolism, microcirculatory ischemia, cardiac muscle fibrosis, diastolic dysfunction and arrhythmia (4). The early detection of HCM is very important for the timely treatment intervention.
Recently, several studies (5,6) have found that elevated levels of soluble ST2 (sST2) in patients with chronic systolic heart failure is a novel biomarker that enhances risk stratification. ST2 is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family glycoprotein, which is widely involved in the process of myocardial remodeling (7). However, the role of sST2 in patients with HCM remains unclear. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a lectin secreted by activated macrophages and it’s bound to beta galactose (8). It’s been reported that Gal-3 is involved in multiple pathophysiological processes of heart failure, including myocardial fibrosis, inflammation, and myocardial remodeling (9,10). A clinical study (11) has found that the Gal-3 level is an independent predictor of all-cause death and re-admission in patients with heart failure. Myocardial interstitial fibrosis and left ventricular diastolic function are impaired in patients with HCM (12), it’s reasonable to assume that sST2 and Gal-3 may be participated in the progress of HCM. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the roles of sST2 and Gal-3 in patients with HCM and to assess its correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with HCM undergoing ventricular septal myectomy.
Methods
Ethical considerations
This present study has been checked and approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital (No. 20161086).
Participants
HCM patients who underwent modified Morrow surgery in our hospital during June 2016–June 2018 were selected as study subjects. HCM was defined as significant left ventricular wall segmental hypertrophy, left ventricular end-diastolic maximum wall thickness ≥15 mm, the other systemic or localized diseases that can cause ventricular hypertrophy should be excluded. The indications for ventricular septal myectomy were: the effects of drug treatment were undesired, left or lower left ventricular outflow/left ventricular pressure gradient ≥50 mmHg at rest. The patients were excluded if the patients had history of cardiac surgery, myocardial ablation or severe liver and renal insufficiency. Our study was complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committees of the participating hospitals. All patients provided written, informed consent.
Furthermore, we also selected 125 volunteers without heart disease for medical examination as normal controls with matched gender and age, we attempted to compare the differences of sST2 and Gal-3 levels in those two groups. All the patients were undergone five months period of follow-up, and all the related procedures were conducted in this present hospital.
Biochemical analyses
All blood samples were obtained in a fasting state on the morning of surgery day. Routine biochemistry was analyzed in the central laboratory of our hospital. The patient’s total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), NT-proBNP, and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were detected and analyzed using commercially available assay (Henshe Diagnostics, Shanghai, China). The blood samples for the measurement of sST2 were collected in pyrogen-free tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and further measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with corresponding bioanalysis kits (x28408 and x29505, Xihui, China). All the procedures were conducted in comply with the related guidelines. The biochemical analyses were performed blindly.
Echocardiography detection
The transthoracic echocardiography was performed using Siemens N10 ultrasound system (German). The difference in pressure between the left ventricular outflow tract and the left ventricle was estimated using continuous Doppler ultrasound. The left atrial inner diameter, maximum wall thickness, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index (g/m2) were measured using methods recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 software. The measurement data were presented with mean ± standard deviation (). Comparisons between consecutive variables were performed using an independent sample t-test; the categorical variables were expressed as ratio (%), and the comparisons between categorical variables were performed using a chi-square test. Survival curves were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods and plotted using GraphPad 6.0 software. Besides, to assess the predictors of clinical endpoints, the Cox proportional hazard regression model was utilized to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Probability values (two-sided) were considered significant at P<0.05.
Results
The characteristics of included HCM patients
A total of 125 HCM patients were included in this present study. Patients with HCM were divided into three groups based on the tertiles of sST2 level: low sST2 group (<10.02 ng/mL), medium sST2 group (10.02 to 15.98 ng/mL), and high sST2 group (>15.98 ng/mL). No significant difference was detected in the age, gender, complicated diseases, drug use, blood laboratory results and echocardiographic analysis among the three sST2-stratified groups. The baseline characteristics of patients stratified by sST2 tertiles are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. The demographic characteristics of 125 HOCM patients stratified by sST2 level.
| Items | Low sST2 group (n=42) |
Medium sST2 group (n=42) | High sST2 group (n=41) |
P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sST2 (ng/mL) | <10.02 | 10.02–15.98 | >15.98 | |
| Age (years) | 49.3±3.95 | 48.9±4.06 | 49.4±3.16 | 0.069 |
| Male | 31 | 30 | 31 | 0.150 |
| BMI | 24.5±2.59 | 24.2±2.62 | 24.4±2.17 | 0.201 |
| Hypertension | 13 | 10 | 11 | 0.094 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.251 |
| HCM family history | 8 | 10 | 9 | 0.127 |
| Drug use | ||||
| Beta blocker | 39 | 40 | 40 | 0.084 |
| ACEI/ARB | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0.156 |
| Calcium antagonist | 10 | 9 | 12 | 0.215 |
| Blood laboratory analysis | ||||
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.48±1.07 | 4.50±0.99 | 4.51±1.15 | 0.308 |
| Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.78±1.09 | 2.80±1.10 | 2.83±1.07 | 0.115 |
| Cardiac troponin I (ng/mL) | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.109 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 1,709.5±123.96 | 1,752.8±142.08 | 1,787.3±183.22 | 0.096 |
| Echocardiographic analysis | ||||
| Peak pressure difference (mmHg) | 82.4±15.29 | 80.42±16.86 | 82.53±15.15 | 0.143 |
| Left atrial inner diameter (mm) | 45.3±9.53 | 43.6±10.22 | 44.9±9.25 | 0.195 |
| Maximum wall thickness (mm) | 21.5±6.40 | 22.3±5.08 | 24.6±7.42 | 0.135 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 75.3±13.25 | 74.4±11.04 | 72.5±10.46 | 0.072 |
| Left ventricular mass index (g/m2) | 170.3±43.08 | 172.3±45.50 | 172.4±48.68 | 0.093 |
HOCM, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.
Meanwhile, patients with HCM were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of Gal-3 level: low Gal-3 group (<7.15 ng/mL), medium Gal-3 group (7.15 to 9.04 ng/mL), and high Gal-3 group (>9.04 ng/mL). No significant difference was detected in the age, gender, complicated diseases, drug use, blood laboratory results and echocardiographic analysis among the three Gal-3-stratified groups. The baseline characteristics of patients stratified by Gal-3 tertiles are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. The demographic characteristics of 125 HOCM patients stratified by Gal-3 level.
| Items | Low Gal-3 group (n=39) |
Medium Gal-3 group (n=44) | High Gal-3 group (n=42) |
P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gal-3 (ng/mL) | <7.15 | 7.15–9.04 | >9.04 | |
| Age (years) | 49.4±2.46 | 48.9±4.12 | 49.1±4.86 | 0.088 |
| Male | 29 | 31 | 32 | 0.190 |
| Hypertension | 11 | 12 | 12 | 0.154 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.101 |
| HCM family history | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0.098 |
| Drug use | ||||
| Beta blocker | 38 | 41 | 40 | 0.144 |
| ACEI/ARB | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.129 |
| Calcium antagonist | 9 | 11 | 11 | 0.242 |
| Blood laboratory analysis | ||||
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.44±1.35 | 4.62±0.83 | 4.50±1.32 | 0.948 |
| Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.73±1.14 | 2.81±1.40 | 2.50±1.46 | 0.104 |
| Cardiac troponin I (ng/mL) | 0.02±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.091 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 1,732.4±130.56 | 1,758.3±142.15 | 1,788.4±184.36 | 0.155 |
| Echocardiographic analysis | ||||
| Peak pressure difference (mmHg) | 83.4±10.25 | 84.3±14.46 | 85.2±14.02 | 0.194 |
| Left atrial inner diameter (mm) | 44.3±9.08 | 43.6±9.25 | 44.5±8.56 | 0.099 |
| Maximum wall thickness (mm) | 23.5±5.49 | 25.0±5.14 | 24.8±6.08 | 0.102 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 74.6±14.21 | 74.5±14.35 | 73.6±13.03 | 0.113 |
| Left ventricular mass index (g/m2) | 173.5±40.16 | 178.4±43.57 | 175.2±43.29 | 0.084 |
HOCM, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.
The sST2 and Gal-3 differences between HCM and control group
As Figure 1 presented, the sST2 and Gal-3 levels in HCM patients were significantly higher than that in control group (all P<0.001).
Figure 1.

The sST2 and Gal-3 differences between HCM and Control group. ***, P<0.001 compared with control.
The incidence of all-cause mortality according to tertiles of sST2 and Gal-3
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there were significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality for HCM patients stratified by the sST2 and Gal-3 levels (log-rank P=0.032 and 0.09, respectively, Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier plots depicting the incidence of all-cause mortality according to tertiles of sST2 and Gal-3. (A) The all-cause mortality according to tertiles of sST2; (B) Kaplan-Meier plots on the all-cause mortality according to tertiles of Gal-3.
Correlations between sST2 and clinical prognosis
As Table 3 presented, Cox univariate regression survival analysis showed that the hypertension (HR =1.19, 95% CI: 1.01–1.38), maximum wall thickness (HR =1.48, 95% CI: 1.04–1.98), Log sST2 (HR =1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05), Log Gal-3 (HR =1.17, 95% CI: 1.09–1.32) were the predictors for all-cause mortality in patients with HCM. Therefore, we included the hypertension, maximum wall thickness, Log sST2, Log Gal-3 in the Cox multivariate risk regression model. The results showed that maximum wall thickness was the independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HCM (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.35–1.97).
Table 3. Cox risk regression analysis on the predictors of all-cause mortality.
| Variables | Univariate regression | Multivariate regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P | ||
| Age | 1.04 (1.00–1.08) | 0.184 | – | – | |
| Male | 1.74 (0.96–2.45) | 0.130 | – | – | |
| Hypertension | 1.19 (1.01–1.38) | 0.047 | 1.10 (0.94–1.37) | 0.099 | |
| HCM family history | 1.01 (0.93–1.09) | 0.098 | – | – | |
| Peak pressure difference | 1.09 (0.87–1.05) | 0.079 | – | – | |
| Maximum wall thickness | 1.48 (1.04–1.98) | 0.042 | 1.63 (1.35–1.97) | 0.015 | |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction | 1.90 (0.82–1.05) | 0.195 | – | – | |
| Left ventricular mass index (g/m2) | 1.14 (0.66–3.58) | 0.507 | – | – | |
| Log sST2 | 1.02 (1.01–1.05) | 0.015 | 1.15 (0.98–1.27) | 0.143 | |
| Log Gal-3 | 1.17 (1.09–1.32) | 0.039 | 1.35 (0.90–1.65) | 0.204 | |
HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; sST2, soluble ST2; Gal-3, Galectin-3.
Discussion
As a kind of heart diseases, HCM is a serious threat to human life (13). For the HCM patients that medications may not effective in relieving symptoms, myocardial resection has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment, which can significantly improve the clinical symptoms and cardiac function (14,15). Exploring the risk factors for clinical events in patients with HCM after ventricular septal myectomy will help to guide postoperative management (16,17). The presence of myocardial fibrosis in HCM patients has been confirmed by reports of myocardial biopsy (18), and it has been found to be an independent predictor of major clinical endpoints in HCM patients (19). In recent years, it has been found (20,21) that both ST2 and Gal-3 are involved in myocardial fibrosis and myocardial remodeling, which may be very promising new biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. This present study has demonstrated that the sST2 and Gal-3 levels enhance risk stratification and predict clinical events based on established risk factors. This study showed that the level of sST2 and Gal-3 are significantly elevated in HCM patients, even rough a follow-up of 12 months revealed no correlation between sST2 and Gal-3 levels and clinical outcomes in patients with HCM after ventricular septal myectomy, and only maximum wall thickness is an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of all-cause death in patients with HCM after ventricular septal myocardial resection, the sST2 and Gal-3 levels may provide potentially valuable reference for HCM treatment.
sST2 is a member of the interleukin-1 receptor family that competes with the ST2L ligand in the cardiac IL-33/ST2L signaling pathway (22,23). It inhibits cardio protection and anti-fibrosis of IL-33/ST2L signaling pathway by binding to IL-33 receptor. In recent years, many studies (24,25) have found that sST2 in plasma is significantly elevated in patients with heart failure and is closely related to the prognosis of heart failure. Besides, as a new cardiac marker, sST2 has been reported to be involved in the activation of cardiac fibroblasts and myocardial fibrosis (26). Meanwhile, it’s been reported that sST2 may be involved in the pathological process of myocardial fibrosis or myocardial remodeling mainly by regulating the degradation process of type I collagen (27). Previous studies have shown that for patients with chronic systolic heart failure, the baseline sST2 levels can increase the predictive value of clinical outcomes on the basis of natriuretic peptides, and continuous monitoring of ST2 levels can also predict patients' clinical outcomes (28). Still, the studies on the role of sST2 in HCM patients are very few, mores studies are warranted in identifying the role sST2.
Gal-3 is a chimeric galectin that can be expressed in a variety of tissues and cells, and interacts with various ligands such as collagen, fibronectin, integrin and laminin in cells and matrix (29). It’s been found that Gal-3 is widely active in inflammatory cells, Gal-3 binds to integrin to mediate cell adhesion (30), promote adhesion of macrophages and vascular endothelial cells (31), accelerate the proliferation and metastasis of smooth muscle cells (32), and accelerate the pathological changes of coronary plaques (33). Previous studies (34,35) have shown that Galectin-3 is highly expressed in unstable regions of mouse and human arterial plaques, it’s been well-believed that it relates to the progress of cardiovascular disease. It’s been found that patients with heart failure with Gal-3 levels >17.8 ng/mL were significantly more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure (36). In this present study, the sST2 and Gal-3 levels were not associated with clinical events in patients with HCM after ventricular septal myectomy, it may be explained that most HCM patients undergoing ventricular septal myectomy have a significant improvement in heart function, significant association results may be obtained if being analyzed in the populations of more severely-injurious population (37,38).
Several limitations should be concerned in this study. Firstly, the study sample is rather small, its statistical effects may be not enough to detect the correlation of sST2, Gal-3 levels and clinical prognosis of HCM patients, we are continuing to collect the related information to reach a larger sample size in the future. And HCM undergoing ventricular septal myomectomy is thought to be hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. The part of obstruction and the change of pressure gradient at obstructive site after ventricular septal myomectomy are important for prognosis. We attempted to include this data at the initial design, yet the most related data are missing, therefore, we cannot include this data. Secondly, due to the resource limitation, we only conducted one-year long follow-up for HCM patients, the longer all-cause mortality remains unclear, there is possibility that the sST2, Gal-3 level can predict the risk of longer period of all-cause mortality. Thirdly, we only detected the level of sST2, Gal-3 in one timepoint, the sST2, Gal-3 level after surgery should also be analyzed whenever possible, the changes of sST2, Gal-3 expression may be related to the effects of surgical treatment, which needs further investigation.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the results of this study indicated that sST2 and Gal-3 were not associated with all-cause mortality of patients with HCM undergoing ventricular septal myectomy, sST2 and Gal-3 provides limited clinical value for risk stratification in this population. However, our study do has some limitations, further studies are warranted to identify the role of sST2 and Gal-3 in cardiovascular diseases.
Acknowledgments
Funding: None.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This present study has been checked and approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital (No. 20161086).
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2020.01.04). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- 1.Mosqueira D, Smith JGW, Bhagwan JR, et al. Modeling Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Mechanistic Insights and Pharmacological Intervention. Trends Mol Med 2019;25:775-90. 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cao Y, Zhang PY. Review of recent advances in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017;21:5207-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sedaghat-Hamedani F, Kayvanpour E, Tugrul OF, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with sarcomere mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis on 7675 individuals. Clin Res Cardiol 2018;107:30-41. 10.1007/s00392-017-1155-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guo X, Fan C, Tian L, et al. The clinical features, outcomes and genetic characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with severe right ventricular hypertrophy. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174118. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matilla L, Ibarrola J, Arrieta V, et al. Soluble ST2 promotes oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiac fibroblasts: an in vitro and in vivo study in aortic stenosis. Clin Sci (Lond) 2019;133:1537-48. 10.1042/CS20190475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berezin AE, Kremzer AA, Samura TA, et al. Altered signature of apoptotic endothelial cell-derived micro vesicles predicts chronic heart failure phenotypes. Biomark Med 2019;13:737-50. 10.2217/bmm-2018-0449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.You H, Jiang W, Jiao M, et al. Association of Soluble ST2 Serum Levels With Outcomes in Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Can J Cardiol 2019;35:727-35. 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gehlken C, Suthahar N, Meijers WC, et al. Galectin-3 in Heart Failure: An Update of the Last 3 Years. Heart Fail Clin 2018;14:75-92. 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Suthahar N, Meijers WC, Sillje HHW, et al. Galectin-3 Activation and Inhibition in Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update. Theranostics 2018;8:593-609. 10.7150/thno.22196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Málek F. Impact of galectin 3 as myofibrosis marker in clinical cardiology. Vnitr Lek 2014;60:327-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van Vark LC, Lesman-Leegte I, Baart SJ, et al. Prognostic Value of Serial Galectin-3 Measurements in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. J Am Heart Assoc 2017. doi: . 10.1161/JAHA.116.003700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sarhene M, Wang Y, Wei J, et al. Biomarkers in heart failure: the past, current and future. Heart Fail Rev 2019;24:867-903. 10.1007/s10741-019-09807-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Choudhry S, Puri K, Denfield SW. An Update on Pediatric Cardiomyopathy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2019;21:36. 10.1007/s11936-019-0739-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Batzner A, Schafers HJ, Borisov KV, et al. Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019;116:47-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hodges K, Rivas CG, Aguilera J, et al. Surgical management of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in a specialized hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;157:2289-99. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Norrish G, Cantarutti N, Pissaridou E, et al. Risk factors for sudden cardiac death in childhood hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017;24:1220-30. 10.1177/2047487317702519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Makavos G, Kappaairis C, Tselegkidi ME, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an updated review on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Heart Fail Rev 2019;24:439-59. 10.1007/s10741-019-09775-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marian AJ, Braunwald E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Circ Res 2017;121:749-70. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Briasoulis A, Mallikethi-Reddy S, Palla M, et al. Myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis. Heart 2015;101:1406-11. 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tuegel C, Katz R, Alam M, et al. GDF-15, Galectin 3, Soluble ST2, and Risk of Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2018;72:519-28. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.03.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lepojärvi ES, Piira OP, Paakko E, et al. Serum PINP, PIIINP, galectin-3, and ST2 as surrogates of myocardial fibrosis and echocardiographic left venticular diastolic filling properties. Front Physiol 2015;6:200. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gao Y, Zhang MY, Wang T, et al. IL-33/ST2L Signaling Provides Neuroprotection Through Inhibiting Autophagy, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, and Apoptosis in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Cell Neurosci 2018;12:95. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Asensio-Lopez MC, Lax A, Fernandez Del Palacio MJ, et al. Yin-Yang 1 transcription factor modulates ST2 expression during adverse cardiac remodeling post-myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2019;130:216-33. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dieplinger B, Mueller T. Soluble ST2 in heart failure. Clin Chim Acta 2015;443:57-70. 10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sinning C, Kempf T, Schwarzl M, et al. Biomarkers for characterization of heart failure - Distinction of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Int J Cardiol 2017;227:272-7. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sanada S, Hakuno D, Higgins LJ, et al. IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system. J Clin Invest 2007;117:1538-49. 10.1172/JCI30634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martínez-Martínez E, Miana M, Jurado-Lopez R, et al. A role for soluble ST2 in vascular remodeling associated with obesity in rats. PLoS One 2013;8:e79176. 10.1371/journal.pone.0079176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Greenway SC. The Continuation of Trickle-Down Medicine: Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) in Pediatric Heart Failure. Can J Cardiol 2019;35:692-3. 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.02.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Di Tano G, Caretta G, De Maria R, et al. Galectin-3 and outcomes after anterior-wall myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Biomark Med 2018;12:21-6. 10.2217/bmm-2017-0178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yang EH, Rode J, Howlader MA, et al. Galectin-3 alters the lateral mobility and clustering of beta1-integrin receptors. PLoS One 2017;12:e0184378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0184378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ibarrola J, Martinez-Martinez E, Sadaba JR, et al. Beneficial Effects of Galectin-3 Blockade in Vascular and Aortic Valve Alterations in an Experimental Pressure Overload Model. Int J Mol Sci 2017. doi: . 10.3390/ijms18081664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barman SA, Li X, Haigh S, et al. Galectin-3 is expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells and promotes pulmonary hypertension through changes in proliferation, apoptosis, and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2019;316:L784-L797. 10.1152/ajplung.00186.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.MacKinnon AC, Liu X, Hadoke PW, et al. Inhibition of galectin-3 reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Glycobiology 2013;23:654-63. 10.1093/glycob/cwt006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Du XJ, Zhao WB, Nguyen MN, et al. beta-Adrenoceptor activation affects galectin-3 as a biomarker and therapeutic target in heart disease. Br J Pharmacol 2019;176:2449-64. 10.1111/bph.14620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Souza BSF, Silva DN, Carvalho RH, et al. Association of Cardiac Galectin-3 Expression, Myocarditis, and Fibrosis in Chronic Chagas Disease Cardiomyopathy. Am J Pathol 2017;187:1134-46. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang CH, Cheng ML, Liu MH, et al. Metabolic profile provides prognostic value better than galectin-3 in patients with heart failure. J Cardiol 2017;70:92-8. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lax A, Sanchez-Mas J, Asensio-Lopez MC, Fernandez-Del Palacio MJ, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists modulate galectin-3 and interleukin-33/ST2 signaling in left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction. JACC Heart Fail 2015;3:50-8. 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bayes-Genis A, de Antonio M, Vila J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 2 myocardial fibrosis biomarkers for long-term heart failure risk stratification: ST2 versus galectin-3. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:158-66. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

