Escherichia coli is a common reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes that can be easily transformed to possess multidrug resistance through plasmid transfer. To understand multidrug resistance plasmids, we report the plasmid sequences of four large plasmids carrying a number of genes related to antimicrobial resistance that were found in E. coli strains isolated from beef cattle.
ABSTRACT
Escherichia coli is a common reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes that can be easily transformed to possess multidrug resistance through plasmid transfer. To understand multidrug resistance plasmids, we report the plasmid sequences of four large plasmids carrying a number of genes related to antimicrobial resistance that were found in E. coli strains isolated from beef cattle.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Antimicrobial resistance is a serious concern in human medicine and public health (1). The commensal Escherichia coli is a common bacterial reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes because of its ability to donate and to accept transmissible genetic elements such as plasmids. E. coli is distributed in a variety of warm-blooded animals (2, 3). Plasmids allow the rapid transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes among bacteria (4) and are thought to contribute to the recent emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria (5, 6). We recently obtained multidrug-resistant E. coli strains from beef cattle feces in Japan (7), and large plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes were considered to facilitate drug resistance in those strains (8). To understand the functionality of the large plasmids, we sequenced four plasmids that conferred multidrug resistance to E. coli strains.
Multidrug-resistant E. coli strains were grown on lysogeny broth agar, and plasmid DNA was extracted from the bacterial cultures using a NucleoBond Xtra midikit (Macherey-Nagel). Plasmid DNA was transformed into the host E. coli strain DH10B (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified using cesium chloride gradient centrifugation. Genome libraries were prepared using a GS FLX Titanium rapid library preparation kit and analyzed using a Roche/454 GS FLX Titanium system. Reads were quality checked and assembled using GS De Novo Assembler v2.8. The E. coli DH10B sequence was rejected in silico using GenomeMatcher v3.0 (9). The genome was annotated using Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MiGAP) v2.23 (10). Default parameters were used except where otherwise noted.
Sequence data were obtained for a region of 74,277,843 to 131,327,361 bp from 131,990 to 232,733 reads (Table 1). The four plasmid sequences were assembled into 18 to 71 contigs, comprising 83,862 to 141,617 nucleotides at 516× to 878× coverage (G+C content, 50.69 to 53.06%). The four plasmid sequences were annotated to contain 93 to 208 putative coding sequences, including 5 to 20 genes related to antimicrobial resistance determined in silico.
TABLE 1.
Summary of data for four large plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes
| Parameter | Data for plasmid: |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p5 | p15 | p41-3 | p41-5 | |
| Results of sequencing analysis | ||||
| Total no. of reads | 153,363 | 232,733 | 131,990 | 141,597 |
| Total read length (bp) | 90,263,916 | 131,327,361 | 74,277,843 | 80,843,101 |
| Total genome size (bp) | 120,730 | 141,617 | 125,307 | 83,862 |
| G+C content (%) | 52.7 | 50.69 | 50.99 | 53.06 |
| No. of coding sequences | 135 | 208 | 150 | 93 |
| Coverage (fold) | 516 | 833 | 539 | 878 |
| No. of contigs | 34 | 71 | 22 | 18 |
| Maximum contig length (bp) | 31,488 | 30,084 | 30,525 | 37,533 |
| GenBank accession no. | LC318090 to LC318123 | LC317979 to LC318049 | LC318050 to LC318071 | LC318072 to LC318089 |
| DRA accession no. | DRR213731 | DRR213732 | DRR213733 | DRR213734 |
| Putative Inc groups | FIA, FIB | F, N | F, N | FIA, FIB |
| Antimicrobial resistance genes | ||||
| No. of genes | 16 | 20 | 10 | 5 |
| Detected genes (no. of copies) | blaTEM-1, strA, strB, aphA1 (3), aacC3 (2), tetA (2), cat-20, aac6′-lb-cr, sul1, sul2, acetyltransferase, streptomycin 3′-O-adenylyltransferase | blaCTX-14 (3), strA, strB, ant3′9, tetA (5), tetC, tetO (4), teTR_D, dhfr, sul1, sul2 | blaTEM-1, blaCTX-14, ant3′9, tetA (2), tetC, tetO, teTR_D, dhfr, sul1 | strA, strB, aacC3, tetA, sul2 |
Antimicrobial resistance genes included on the four plasmids were well matched to the resistance gene profiles demonstrated using Southern hybridization in our previous study (8). The putative Inc groups for the four plasmids were any of the F, FIA, FIB, or N groups, all of which are known to have self-transmission abilities. In addition, mobile genetic elements such as transposons and insertion sequences were observed in the flanking regions of each antimicrobial resistance gene. These results indicate that a single event of horizontal transfer of a plasmid might generate a multidrug-resistant microorganism. Moreover, two plasmids, p41-3 and p41-5, which showed different antimicrobial resistance gene profiles, were identified from strain QD1-5-9, indicating that more than one multidrug resistance plasmid can exist within one cell. Considering that plasmids containing various resistance genes have an influence on the diversity and complexity of circulating antimicrobial resistance profiles, further plasmid analysis will provide a better understanding of the distribution, diversity, and mechanisms of the emerging multidrug-resistant strains.
Data availability.
The GenBank accession numbers are given in Table 1. Raw sequence data were deposited in the DRA under BioProject accession number PRJDB9410.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Tenshi College for its cooperation in this study.
This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant 19K14024).
REFERENCES
- 1.Aarestrup FM, Bager F, Jensen NE, Madsen M, Meyling A, Wegener HC. 1998. Resistance to antimicrobial agents used for animal therapy in pathogenic-, zoonotic- and indicator bacteria isolated from different food animals in Denmark: a baseline study for the Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Programme (DANMAP). APMIS 106:745–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1998.tb00222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson MA, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ. 2006. Diversity and distribution of Escherichia coli genotypes and antibiotic resistance phenotypes in feces of humans, cattle, and horses. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6914–6922. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01029-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Winokur PL, Vonstein DL, Hoffman LJ, Uhlenhopp EK, Doern GV. 2001. Evidence for transfer of CMY-2 AmpC β-lactamase plasmids between Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from food animals and humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2716–2722. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2716-2722.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davison J. 1999. Genetic exchange between bacteria in the environment. Plasmid 42:73–91. doi: 10.1006/plas.1999.1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Call DR, Singer RS, Meng D, Broschat SL, Orfe LH, Anderson JM, Herndon DR, Kappmeyer LS, Daniels JB, Besser TE. 2010. blaCMY-2-Positive IncA/C plasmids from Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica are a distinct component of a larger lineage of plasmids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:590–596. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00055-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fernández-Alarcón C, Singer RS, Johnson TJ. 2011. Comparative genomics of multidrug resistance-encoding IncA/C plasmids from commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli from multiple animal sources. PLoS One 6:e23415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yamamoto S, Iwabuchi E, Hasegawa M, Esaki H, Muramatsu M, Hirayama N, Hirai K. 2013. Prevalence and molecular epidemiological characterization of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from Japanese black beef cattle. J Food Prot 76:394–404. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamamoto S, Nakano M, Kitagawa W, Tanaka M, Sone T, Hirai K, Asano K. 2014. Characterization of multi-antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from beef cattle in Japan. Microbes Environ 29:136–144. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me13173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ohtsubo Y, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Nagata Y, Tsuda M. 2008. GenomeMatcher: a graphical user interface for DNA sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 9:376. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sugawara H, Ohyama A, Mori H, Kurokawa K. 2009. Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MiGAP) for diverse users. 20th Int Conf Genome Informatics 2009:S001-1–S001-2. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The GenBank accession numbers are given in Table 1. Raw sequence data were deposited in the DRA under BioProject accession number PRJDB9410.
