Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 May 14;9(20):e00234-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00234-20

Complete Genome Sequences of Six Lactobacillus iners Strains Isolated from the Human Vagina

Michael T France a, Lindsay Rutt a,b, Shilpa Narina a,b, Sarah Arbaugh a,b, Elias McComb a,b, Mike S Humphrys a,b, Bing Ma a,b, Matthew R Hayward c, Elizabeth K Costello d,e,f, David A Relman d,e,f, Douglas S Kwon c,g, Jacques Ravel a,b,
Editor: Catherine Putontih
PMCID: PMC7225536  PMID: 32409537

Lactobacillus iners is a common member of the human vaginal microbiota, with a genome size smaller than that of other lactobacilli. Here, we report the complete genome sequences of six L. iners strains isolated from different vaginal swab specimens. Three strains were found to harbor ∼100-kbp plasmids, which were not known previously.

ABSTRACT

Lactobacillus iners is a common member of the human vaginal microbiota, with a genome size smaller than that of other lactobacilli. Here, we report the complete genome sequences of six L. iners strains isolated from different vaginal swab specimens. Three strains were found to harbor ∼100-kbp plasmids, which were not known previously.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacillus iners is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic bacterium that is a member of the human vaginal microbiota (1, 2). Surveys have demonstrated that a substantial portion of reproductive-age women have a vaginal microbiota dominated by L. iners (3, 4). The species’ relationship to vaginal health is somewhat complicated (5). While it is capable of lowering vaginal pH via the production of lactic acid, a hallmark of vaginal health (6), it is also frequently found coresident with species that have been associated with bacterial vaginosis, a common vaginal condition associated with adverse health outcomes (79). The species has also been shown to provide suboptimal protection against sexually transmitted infections, such as those caused by chlamydia (10, 11). Here, we report the complete genome sequences of six L. iners strains.

The six L. iners strains were isolated from archived and deidentified midvaginal swab specimens collected from either African American (n = 3) or Caucasian women (n = 3). The swab specimens were originally collected after obtaining informed consent from all participants, who also provided consent for storage of the samples and their use in future research studies related to women's health. The original studies were approved by the University of Maryland School of Medicine institutional review board. The swab specimens were resuspended in 1 ml of brucella broth supplemented with hemin and vitamin K, and then 25 μl of the suspension was plated onto human blood bilayer agar with Tween 80. After 48 to 72 hours of aerobic or anaerobic (5%:10%:85% H2/CO2/N2 gas mixture) incubation at 37°C, the strains were isolated. Large genomic DNA fragments were extracted using the MasterPure complete DNA purification kit (Lucigen, Middleton, WI, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the SMRTbell express template prep kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences of California, Menlo Park, CA, USA), size selected on a BluePippin instrument (Sage Science, Beverly, MA, USA), and sequenced on a PacBio Sequel II instrument (Pacific Biosciences) with a single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cell 8M.

An average of 310,000 reads were obtained for each strain (median read length, 10.1 kbp), providing an average genome coverage of 2,258× (range, 1,203× to 3,682×). Long read assembly was performed using the Canu assembler v1.8 on the raw PacBio reads with a target genome size of 1.3 Mbp and a minimum read length of 1 kbp (12). For three of the strains, a single large contig was produced, circularized using Simple-Circularise (https://github.com/Kzra/Simple-Circularise; v1 default settings), and then oriented using Circlator v1.5.5 with default settings (13), such that the origin of replication was at the start. The remaining three strains had an additional contig encoding an ∼100-kbp plasmid, which was also circularized.

The average genome size of the six L. iners was 1.36 Mbp and ranged from 1.32 Mbp to 1.40 Mbp, with an average GC content of 33.3% (Fig. 1). Despite being isolated from six different subjects, the L. iners genome sequences were fairly similar, with an average nucleotide identify (ANI) of 98.7% and overlap of 91.6%, as estimated by pyani v0.2.10 with the -ANIm setting (14). The three plasmid sequences were also largely similar, with an ANI of 98.1% and overlap of 85.1%. Gene prediction and annotation were performed using Prokka v1.12 with default settings (15). The average number of coding sequences per genome was 1,254 and ranged from 1,203 to 1,331. Five of the six L. iners genomes were found to encode 6 rRNA operons, while the genome of strain C0254C1 encoded one fewer. All of the genomes encoded 71 tRNA genes, except the genome of strain C0059G1, which encoded 73. The plasmid was found to encode between 97 and 100 genes, including several related to conjugal transfer.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Circular whole-genome alignment of the six Lactobacillus iners chromosomes and the three identified plasmid sequences. Inside the chromosomal alignment is an unrooted phylogram derived from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in the whole-genome alignment that displays the phylogenetic relationships and genome sizes of the six strains. Alignment figures were constructed using BRIG v0.95 (16) and the phylogram using CSI phylogeny v1.4 with default settings (17).

Data availability.

The six genome sequences and three plasmid sequences have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank with accession numbers CP049223 to CP049231. Raw sequencing reads were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject PRJNA608123.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the Institute for Genome Science’s Genomic Resources Center, including Luke Tallon, Jack Boylan, and Holly Roussey, for technical assistance.

This work was supported, in part, by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute for Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers U19AI084044, UH2AI083264, and R01NR015495 and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1189217). D.A.R. is supported by the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Microbiome Initiative and the Thomas C. and Joan M. Merigan Endowment at Stanford University.

J.R. is a cofounder of LUCA Biologics, a biotechnology company focusing on translating microbiome research into live biotherapeutic drugs for women’s health. All other authors declare no competing interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Vaneechoutte M. 2017. Lactobacillus iners, the unusual suspect. Res Microbiol 168:826–836. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Anukam KC, Cribby S, Reid G. 2011. At the crossroads of vaginal health and disease, the genome sequence of Lactobacillus iners AB-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4688–4695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000086107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, Mcculle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. 2011. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gosmann C, Anahtar MN, Handley SA, Farcasanu M, Abu-Ali G, Bowman BA, Padavattan N, Desai C, Droit L, Moodley A, Dong M, Chen Y, Ismail N, Ndung'u T, Ghebremichael MS, Wesemann DR, Mitchell C, Dong KL, Huttenhower C, Walker BD, Virgin HW, Kwon DS. 2017. Lactobacillus-deficient cervicovaginal bacterial communities are associated with increased HIV acquisition in young South African women. Immunity 46:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. 2017. Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe? Trends Microbiol 25:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O'Hanlon DE, Moench TR, Cone RA. 2011. In vaginal fluid, bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis can be suppressed with lactic acid but not hydrogen peroxide. BMC Infect Dis 11:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Lillis R, Martin DH, Ferris MJ. 2010. Quantitative PCR assessments of bacterial species in women with and without bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 48:1812–1819. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00851-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ravel J, Brotman R, Gajer P, Ma B, Nandy M, Fadrosh D, Sakamoto J, Koenig S, Fu L, Zhou X, Hickey R, Schwebke J, Forney L. 2013. Daily temporal dynamics of vaginal microbiota before, during and after episodes of bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome 1:29. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peebles K, Velloza J, Balkus JE, Mcclelland RS, Barnabas RV. 2019. High global burden and costs of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis 46:304–311. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van Houdt R, Ma B, Bruisten SM, Speksnijder A, Ravel J, de Vries H. 2018. Lactobacillus iners-dominated vaginal microbiota is associated with increased susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Dutch women: a case-control study. Sex Transm Infect 94:117–123. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edwards VL, Smith SB, McComb EJ, Tamarelle J, Ma B, Humphrys MS, Gajer P, Gwilliam K, Schaefer AM, Lai SK, Terplan M, Mark KS, Brotman RM, Forney LJ, Bavoil PM, Ravel J. 2019. The cervicovaginal microbiota-host interaction modulates Chlamydia trachomatis infection. mBio 10:e01548-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01548-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. 2016. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 8:12–24. doi: 10.1039/C5AY02550H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alikhan N-F, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. 2011. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaas RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2014. Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS One 9:e104984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The six genome sequences and three plasmid sequences have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank with accession numbers CP049223 to CP049231. Raw sequencing reads were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject PRJNA608123.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES