Skip to main content
Toxicology Reports logoLink to Toxicology Reports
. 2020 May 4;7:583–595. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.04.010

MicroRNAs and Xenobiotic Toxicity: An Overview

Satheeswaran Balasubramanian 1, Kanmani Gunasekaran 1, Saranyadevi Sasidharan 1, Vignesh Jeyamanickavel Mathan 1, Ekambaram Perumal 1,*
PMCID: PMC7225592  PMID: 32426239

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg

Abbreviations: ADAMTS9, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 9; Ag, Silver; AHR, Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor; Al2O3, Aluminium oxide; AMPK, Adenosine Monophosphate-activated protein kinase; ARRB1, Arrestin beta 1; Au, Gold; Aβ, Amyloid Beta; BaP, Benzo[a]pyrene; BCB, Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier; bcl2l11, B-cell lymphoma-2-like protein 11; BNIP3−3, BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3; CCNB1, Cyclin B1; CDC25A, M-phase inducer phosphatase 1; CDC25C, M-phase inducer phosphatase 3; CDK, Cyclin-dependent Kinase; CDK1, Cyclin-dependent kinase 1; CDK6, Cyclin-dependent kinase 6; CDKN1b, Cyclin-dependent kinase Inhibitor 1B; CEC, Contaminants of Emerging Concern; ceRNA, Competing endogenous RNA; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COX2, Cyclooxygenase-2; CTGF, Connective Tissue Growth Factor; DGCR8, DiGeorge syndrome chromosomal [or critical] region 8; DNA, Deoxy ribonucleic acid; DON, Deoxynivalenol; ER, Endoplasmic Reticulum; Fadd, Fas-associated protein with death domain; Grp78/BIP, Binding immunoglobulin protein; GTP, Guanosine triphosphate; Hpf, Hours post fertilization; HSPA1A, Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1; IL1R1, Interleukin 1 receptor, type 1; IL-6, Interleukin 6; lncRNAs, Long non-coding RNA; LIN28B, Lin-28 homolog B; LRP-1-, Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1; MAPK, Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase; MC-LR, Microcystin-Leucine Arginine; MC-RR, Microcystin-Arginine Arginine; miRNA, MicroRNA; Mn, Manganese; MRE, MicroRNA Response Elements; mRNA, Messenger RNA; NASH, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NET1, Neuroepithelial Cell Transforming 1; NF- ҡB, Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; NFKBAP, NFKB Activating protein-1; NMDAR, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; NPs, Nanoparticles; Nrf2, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PDCD4, Programmed cell death protein 4; PFAS, Poly-fluoroalkyl substances; PM2.5, Particulate Matter2.5; qRT-PCR, quantitative Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction; ripk 1, Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1; RISC, RNA-induced silencing complex; RNAi, RNA interference; RNA, Ribonucleic acid; RNase III, Ribonuclease III; SEMA6D, Semaphorin-6D; SiO2, Silicon dioxide; SOLiD, Sequencing by Oligonucleotide Ligation and Detection; SPIONs, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor – alpha; TP53, Tumor protein 53; TRBP, Transactivation Response RNA Binding Protein; UTR, Untranslated region; WHO, World Health Organization; Wnt, Wingless-related integration site; ZEA, Zearalanone; Zn, Zinc

Keywords: Biomarkers, Epigenetics, Environment, Gene regulation, Non-coding RNAs, Toxicity

Highlights

  • miRNAs are key regulators of gene expression at both transcription and translation.

  • The role of miRNAs in xenobiotic toxicity and its potential as biomarkers are being explored.

  • In spite of numerous studies, the complex mechanism of miRNA biogenesis and its regulation remains unclear.

Abstract

The advent of new technologies has paved the rise of various chemicals that are being employed in industrial as well as consumer products. This leads to the accumulation of these xenobiotic compounds in the environment where they pose a serious threat to both target and non-target species. miRNAs are one of the key epigenetic mechanisms that have been associated with toxicity by modulating the gene expression post-transcriptionally. Here, we provide a comprehensive view on miRNA biogenesis, their mechanism of action and, their possible role in xenobiotic toxicity. Further, we review the recent in vitro and in vivo studies involved in xenobiotic exposure induced miRNA alterations and the mRNA-miRNA interactions. Finally, we address the challenges associated with the miRNAs in toxicological studies.

1. Introduction

Xenobiotics are chemical compounds foreign to the body or ecosystem that are identified persistently in the environment which are accumulated by means of anthropogenic sources. With a stupendous increase in chemicals being synthesized for various sectors, all these compounds end up being dumped into the environment posing a risk for all forms of life from microbes to animals including humans [1]. Once they enter the biological systems, they affect the homeostasis of the body leading to various adverse effects including the alteration in the genes. These alterations in the genes are both stable and transient. One aspect of gene expressions upon exposure to these xenobiotics is controlled by epigenetic mechanisms [2]. Epigenetics in simple terms involves the regulation of genes without altering the nucleotide sequence [3]. They control the gene expression on both transcriptional and translational levels. This includes non-coding RNAs.

miRNAs are short non protein-coding RNAs of ∼22 nucleotides in length. They fine-tune the gene expression in response to various external stimuli, including environmental toxicants [4]. Their role in gene regulation was first identified in Caenorhabditis elegans in the early 90′s. There, the first identified miRNA (LIN 4) negatively regulated the gene which is involved in the post-transcriptional development (LIN14) [5,6]. Soon, they have been identified to play a major role in the post transcriptional regulation of genes finding their ways in health and other aspects [7]. Their interactions with environmental toxicants are being explored due to their rising importance as quoted by Lema and Cunningham [8] “Increasing evidence that the expression of microRNAs is affected by several known toxicants as well as oxidative and other forms of cellular stress certainly suggest an important role of microRNAs in toxicology, which could provide a link between environmental influences and gene expression.”

2. miRNA biogenesis and their mechanism of action

Extensive research has been carried out to understand the synthesis and function of miRNAs with other epigenetic mechanism also regulating miRNA biogenesis [9]. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II/III, either from the intron regions of the protein-coding genes (intragenic) or independently with their own (intergenic) promoters [10,11]. The canonical pathway is the major pathway through which the majority of miRNAs are processed. After transcription, pri-miRNAs are processed into pre-miRNAs by a microprocessor complex. This complex includes RNA binding protein DGCR8 and a ribonuclease III enzyme Drosha, which cleaves the pri-miRNA duplex to form an overhang at 3′ of pre-miRNA of ∼70 nt [10]. Once processed, they are exported to the cytoplasm via exportin 5 (XPO5)/RanGTP complex [12,13]. After the export, Dicer, RNase III endonuclease along with TRBP, cleaves the pre-miRNA to form a mature miRNA complex which has a guide strand and a passenger strand [14]. The passenger and guide strands are selected based on various factors, including thermodynamic stability. They both are loaded into argonaute proteins where the passenger strand is subsequently degraded [15]. Various canonical pathways have been elucidated. One such pathway is used by mirtrons, miRNAs that are obtained from introns of mRNA during splicing. Others include miRNAs generated from small nucleolar RNA precursors. However, recent research suggests that even in the absence of Dicer, some of the miRNAs can be produced via alternative pathways proving the highly complex machinery which is yet to be studied [16].

Studies on miRNA mediated gene regulation are predominantly based on gene silencing via translational repression and mRNA degradation (Fig. 1). miRNA induced gene silencing is performed by miRISC which consists of the argonaute protein and the guide strand. They bind to the specific sequence at the 3′ UTR (MRE) of their target mRNA. A full complementary of miR:MRE leads to mRNA slicing while most of the miR:MREs are partially complementary leading to translational inhibition and mRNA decay [17]. miRNA has also been shown to bind to the 5′ UTR and other coding regions leading to gene silencing [18]. However, various research has shown the ability of miRNA to induce transcription as well as translation ([19] [20]). Further studies are needed to understand and validate the functional interaction.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of the miRNA biogenesis, regulation of gene expression and the possible mechanism of xenobiotics in miRNA alteration. Ago2 – Argonaute2; DGCR8 – DiGeorge syndrome chromosomal [or critical] region 8; DROSHA – Ribonuclease III enzyme; GTP – Guanosine triphosphate; mRNA – Messenger RNA; miRNA – microRNA; PACT – Protein kinase RNA activator; POL II/III – RNA Polymerase II/III; POL II – RNA Polymerase II; Pre-miRNA – Precursor microRNA; Pri-miRNA – Primary microRNA; RAN – Ras-related Nuclear protein; RISC – RNA-induced silencing complex; TRBP - Transactivation Response RNA Binding Protein.

3. Role of miRNAs in xenobiotic toxicity

Aberrant expression of miRNAs has been shown to play a major role in disease pathology, including cancer. The miRNAs are being studied for their non-invasive uses in prognosis, diagnosis and therapeutics [21,22]. Various compounds induce carcinogenicity and other forms of toxicity upon exposure to biological systems. Numerous in vitro (Table 1) and in vivo (Table 2) studies have been conducted which provide us an overview of miRNAs alteration and their target gene regulation in response to xenobiotic exposure. Most of the studies use a variety of techniques to study miRNAs key aspects. This includes miRNAs identification, in silico prediction, expression and functional validation (Fig. 2). These combined studies help us to better understand how miRNAs are regulated during different toxicant exposure. The reviewed chemicals include major toxicants that are grouped on the basis of their characteristic behaviour and their physio-chemical attributes.

Table 1.

In vitro studies with prominently altered miRNAs upon xenobiotic exposure.

miRNAs Cell lines Toxicant Exposure Target/s Effect Analyses References
miR-200b HT-29 and HCT-116 5-fluorouracil 10 μM for 6 days PTPN12 Alteration in miRNA expression TaqMan miRNA assay [23]
miR-205 MCF-7 and HepG2 Nonylphenol 12 μM and 52 μM for 3 and 48 h TBX21, GRK7, NHLH1, DNAH9, XCR1, ATP1A4 by miR-205 Alterations in metabolism and apoptotic genes Microarray [24]
miR-320, miR-494 Primary murine bronchial epithelial cells BaP 0.01 μM, 0.1 μM and 1 μM for 12, 24 and 48 h CDK6 Impaired G1 phase
cell-cycle arrest
qRT-PCR [25]
miR-122, miR-143, miR-379 Primary rat hepatocytes Trichostatin A 25 μM for 2, 4 and 7 days Cell proliferation inhibition. Microarray [26]
miR-29b, miR-26a-1, miR-122 HepG2 BaP 2 μM for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h BaP-responsive pathway Apoptosis/DNA Damage Response Microarray [27]
miR-221 WRL-68 MC-LR 10 μg/L for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 passages Cyclin G1 Tumorigenicity qRT-PCR and transfection [28]
miR-21−3p HepG2 and HEK 293 T Berberine chloride 40 μM for 1, 2, 4 and 8 h MAT2A and MAT2B Apoptosis Microarray [29]
miR-197−3p A549 Octanal 0.58 mM for 48 h MAPK signalling pathway Increased phosphorylation of p38 MAPK Microarray and qRT-PCR [30]
miR-31, miR-34a, miR-133 Human Hepatocytes Rifampicin 10 μM for 48 h FOXP1, PDAP1 Alterations in metabolism genes Microarray and qRT-PCR [31]
miR-2195p,
miR-654−3p
Jurkat T cell, Jurkat clone E6−1 Ag NPs and Ag ions 0.2 mg/L for 24 h MT1F and TRIB3 by miR-219−5p and ENDOGL1 by miR-654−3p Oxidative stress, cell cycle and apoptosis Microarray and qRT-PCR analysis [32]
miR-21 GES-1, AGS, BGC-823, HGC-27, MKN-28, and SGC-7901 N-nitroso carcinogen N-methyl-N-nitro-N –nitrosoguanidine 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 μM for 8 h FASLG and BTG2 Tumorigenesis qRT–PCR and Transfection [33]
miR-21 hESC-derived neurons Research-grade propofol 0, 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL for 6 h either one time or three times (once per day for 3 consecutive days) Sprouty 2 Cell death qRT-PCR, miRNA transfection [34]
miR-210, miR-221 LNCaP MIB and DHT MIB −100 pM DHT −2 nM for 4, 8, 24 and 120 h AR receptor Repression of miR-221 and induction of miR-210 miRNA microarrays and qRT-PCR [35]
miR-22 HepG2 Bisphenol A 68 μM for 48 h NET1 and IL1R1 Apoptosis miRNA microarray and qRT-PCR [16]
miR-203 Z310 Lead 5, 10 μM for 12 days TRIC Pb-induced BCB leakage qRT-PCR and transfection [36]
miR-182,miR-185 NIH3T3 PM2.5 0.45 mg/mL for 24 h SLC30A1, SERPINB2, AKR1C1 Carcinogenesis Microarray analysis, qRT-PCR and transfection [37]
More than 202 miRNAs Human dermal fibroblasts AuNPs (size 21.83 ± 4.79 nm) 200 mM for 1, 4 and 8 h mRNA processing and MAPK signalling Alterations in the metabolic process miRNA sequencing and qRT-PCR [38]
388 miRNAs were altered PC-12 SPIONs 214 μg/mL for 24 h Cell death SOLiD Sequencing [39]
miR-122 HepaRG AFB1, AFB2 or BaP 0, 1, 5, 50, 100, or 200 μM for 24, 48, or 72 h Inhibition of HNF4A/miR-122 Carcinogenicity miRNA profiling and qRT-PCR [40]
miR-29b-1, miR-27a hESC-derived neural cells Ag NPs 25 μg/mL for 6 and 24 h Nrf2 Signalling pathway Oxidative stress and dysfunctional neurogenesis Microarray analysis and qRT-PCR [41]
miR-222, miR-877 HepG2 Vildagliptin 100 μM for 24 h Genes involved in cell proliferation and differentiation Hepatic dysfunction qRT-PCR [42]
43 miRNAs were altered Rat astrocytes Ammonia 5 mM for 48 h HO-1 Astrocyte senescence Microarray analysis and
qRT-PCR
[43]
miR-541 GC-1 MC-LR 500 nM for 24 h p15, MDM2 Decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis qRT-PCR, Dual-luciferase reporter assay [44]
miR-155 Mouse Neuronal cell line Manganese NPs 50 μg/mL for 4, 8, 24 and 72 h TNF-α, IL-6 Cytotoxicity and ROS Transfection assay, qRT-PCR [45]
miR-222, miR-494 Lung infiltrating cells Staphylococcal enterotoxin B 50 μg for 48 h CDKN1b, p27kIP1, 2l11 and PUMA Cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis qRT-PCR and Transfection [46]
miR-222,
miR-383, miR-126
Chicken ovarian cells ZnO NPs (30 nm) 5 μg/mL for 24 h Genes involved in Wnt, MAPK, mTOR pathway Adverse effects in the reproductive system qRT-PCR [47]
miR-149−3p, miR-4286 HepG2 cells MC-LR 10 and 50 μM for 24 h Genes involved in MAPK, Purine and pyrimidine synthesis Cytotoxicity and hepatitis qRT-PCR and High throughput sequencing [48]
miR-29b3p,
miR-29a3p, miR-29c3p, miR-1906
Mouse ovarian granulosa cells MC-LR 5 μM for 48 h GAB2, FOS, IGF1 and MAN1A Hormone production and cell growth disruption Microarray and qRT-PCR [49]
miR-17−5p Neuro-2a cells PQ and MPTP 300 μM for 48 h Genes involved in cell cycle and endocytosis Alteration in cell proliferation, and apoptosis qRT-PCR, and Microarray [50]
miR-431−5p, miR-1229−5p, miR-3648, miR-6126,
miR-6779−5p
A549 cells Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate 0 to 3 μg/mL for 24 or 48 h ANKRD29, STC2,CYP4V2 Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell cycle changes, and apoptosis qRT-PCR, and Microarray [51]
miR-451a, miR-15b-3p and miR-4521 Human liver cell line MC-LR 1, 2.5,5 or 10 μM for 24 h mTOR, RAS, RAP 1 and HIF-1 Hepatotoxicity qRT-PCR [52]
miR-200b Primary human hepatocytes and NHPTK cells Rifampicin 10 μM for 24 h Genes involved in drug metabolizing Xenobiotic and endobiotic metabolism qRT-PCR, ChIP-Seq [53]
miR-451a HL7702 MC-LR 5 or 10 μM for 24 h ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 Cytoskeletal damage qRT-PCR and Transfection [52]
miR-200b-3p,
miR -200c-3p,
miR-205−5p
Human primary brain microvascular endothelial cells Cupric Chloride 0.5 μM for 48 h Endothelial LRP1 Vascular damage qRT-PCR [54]
miR-34a HepG2 Cells AgNPs (20 nm), AuNPs and SPIONs 10 μg/mL AgNPs, 10 μg/mL AuNPs, 5 μg/mL SPIONs for 24 h TNF Tumorigenesis qRT-PCR and methylation analysis [106]
miR-222, miR-210, miR-101miR-34a A549 cells PM2.5 50 μg/mL for 2 h NRF2 and NFҡB. Oxidative and inflammation pathway dysfunction qRT-PCR [55]
miR-2861 Primary mouse spermatocyte cells Silica NPs 0 and 5 mg/mL for 30 passages FADD, CASPASE-8, CASPASE-3, FAS1 Death receptor pathway dysregulation Transfection [56]
miR-128−3p,
miR-4306
EA. hy926 cell PM2.5 2.5,10 μg/cm2 for 24 h Genes involved in the focal adhesion pathway dysfunction of endothelial cells Microarray and qRT-PCR [57]
miR-1303,
miR-222−3p,miR-192
−5p
SH-SY5Y Bortezomib 50 nM for 24 h DCX, CDK6, ALCAM Cell proliferation inhibition Microarray analysis and
qRT-PCR
[58]
miR-21−5p,
miR-27a-3p, miR-29c-3p, miR-30b-5p, miR-30c-5p
RPTEC/hTERT and human kidney-2 cells Cadmium Chloride 10 mM Oxidative stress pathway Nephrotoxicity miRNA profiling and qRT-PCR [59]
miR-689, miR-690,
miR-709, miR-1187
Hippocampal neuronal cells from new-born C57BL/6 mice NMDA 20−30 μM for 10 min NMDAR signalling Neural dysfunction Microarray analysis and qRT-PCR [60]
miR-1839−5p,miR-126a-5p, miR-15a Porcine granulosa cells ZEN 30 μM for 48 h Cell cycle pathway Growth inhibition and cell cycle arrest miRNA sequencing and qRT-PCR [61]
miR-297 Human bronchial epithelial cells Aluminium oxide NPs 0, 50 and 100 mg/mL for 24 h NKAP Pulmonary inflammation qRT-PCR, miRNA transfection [62]

Table 2.

Xenobiotics induced miRNA changes in in vivo models.

miRNA Model Toxicant Exposure Target Effect Analyses References
miR-298, miR-370 Male Crl(SD)IGS rats APAP and CCL4 APAP – 1 g/kg, CCL4 – 0.3 mL/kg for 6 and 24 h Mitochondrial dysfunction Microarray analysis and
qRT- PCR
[63]
miR-26,
miR-181,
miR-206
Female, virgin B6C3F1 mice RDX 5 mg/kg for 28 days Protooncogene, Oncogene homolog 1 Neurotoxicity and carcinogenesis miRNA Microarray and qRT-PCR [132]
miR-16, miR-21, miR-146a Pregnant human females Cigarette smoking [Nicotine and BaP] On average, 38 weeks of gestation BCL2L2, EDA, PLAG1, SATB1, TRAF6 Alteration in cell cycle regulation and development of the placenta qRT-PCR [64]
miR-430, miR-125, miR-31 Zebrafish MC 12 to 48 mM from 0 hpf to 72 hpf Teratogenic effects miRNA Microarray and qRT-PCR [65]
miR-101a, miR-122 Male C57BL/6 J strain mice TCDD 50 μg/kg, 10 mL/kg b.w for 14 days COX2, EZH2 Liver damage qRT-PCR [66]
miR-192, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-99a – 3p, miR-21 and miR-16 Female BALB/c Mice MC 20 μg/kg b.w/day for 28 days Liver tumorigenesis miRNA Microarray, qRT-PCR [67]
miR-17a, miR-15a, 107, 124, 125b, 203b and 218 Zebrafish embryos TCDD 5 nM for 1 h, at 30 hpf Abnormal developmental phenotypes Small RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR [68]
miR-34c Crl:CD(SD) rats DOX DOX –1 to 3 mg/kg/week for 6 weeks (Intravenous) SIPA1 Symptoms of Cardiomyopathy, Cardiotoxicity Affymetrix assay, qRT-PCR [69]
miR-27b Zebrafish Crude microcystins 50, 200, 800 mg/L for 24 h CYP3A65 and PXR Hepatotoxicity qRT-PCR [70]
miR-146a Pregnant women Bisphenol A 40 pregnant women from polluted area Neural and cardiovascular disease genes Fetal malformations. Microarray and qRT-PCR [71]
miR-575 and miR-4286 Pregnant women Lead and Mercury 60 Mexican women with known exposure AHR signalling pathway Reproductive system development, preeclampsia NanoString nCounter system [72]
miR-15a, miR-21, miR-34a, miR-192 Pigs ZEA and DON ZEA - 40 μg/kg/day,
DON - 12 μg/kg/day, ZEA + DON - 40 + 12 μg/kg/day
PDCD4, IL10 Cell proliferation and survival pathway dysregulation qRT-PCR [73]
miR-291a-3p C57bl/6 mice Lead acetate 9.6 mM for 1, 2, and 5 weeks Uc.173 Apoptosis of nerve cells qRT-PCR [74]
miR-126−3p Zebrafish Atrazine 0.3, 3, or 30 μg/L from 0 hpf to 72 hpf ANTXR2 Angiogenesis and neurodevelopment Microarray and qRT-PCR [75]
miR-541 BALB/c Mice MC-LR 7.5 μg, 15 μg or 30 μg for 2 weeks p15, MDM2 Decrease cell viability and increase cell apoptosis qRT-PCR, Dual-luciferase reporter assay [44]
miR-222 miR-494 C57BL/6 Mice Staphylococcal enterotoxin B 50 μg for 48 h CDKN1b, p27kIP1, BCL2,l11 and PUMA Cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis qRT-PCR and Transfection [46]
miR-200a-3p, miR-5132−5p, miR-5130 ICR Mice Dioscorea bulbifera 300 mg/kg, 375 mg/kg and 450 mg/kg for 24 h MECP2, RNF165, IFFO2 Dnaja1 expression alteration qRT-PCR [76]
miR-208, miR-212, miR-18a Sprague Dawley Rats Nanosized SiO2 6.25, 12.5, 25 mg/mL and 25 mg/mL for 7 th, 15 th, 30 th, 60 th and 90 th day PDCD4,LIN28B and CTGF Alterations in pulmonary hypoplasia, signal pathways of MAPK and TGF-β qRT-PCR [76]
miR-34a, miR-122,
miR-370
CD-1 mice Bisphenol A 25 μg/kg bw/day from gestational day 8 to 4 weeks NRF2, SREBP-1C Fat accumulation qRT-PCR [121]
miR-122−3p, miR-194−5p,miR-5099 ICR and C57BL/6 Dioscoreabulbifera and diosbulbin B 450 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg for 24 h Genes involved in cellular stress response, cell apoptosis and liver injury Liver injury qRT-PCR and Microarray [][125]
miR-126 and miR-155 Human Arsenic (inorganic form) 30.5 ± 25.5 μg/g Genes involved in vascular homeostasis and inflammatory signalling pathway Cardiotoxicity qRT-PCR [77]
miR-122 Wistar albino Rats Bisphenol A 0.5 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg for 30 days JNK, ERK1/2, and MAPKAPK Oxidative stress and hepatotoxicity qRT-PCR, Western blotting and Histology [78]
miR-153b-3p, miR-19a-3p Zebrafish PM2.5 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL for 6–120 hpf CYP3A65, MGST2, GSTP1,GSTO2, GSTO1, CYP1A, EHX1, GSTAl and ALDH3B1 Alterations in oxidative stress, response to stimuli and metabolic
Processes
qRT-PCR and Microarray [79]
miR-7147, miR-26a miR-375 Zebrafish Si-NPs and MeHg (co-exposure) 3 mg/mL of Si-NPs and 0.01 mg/mL of MeHg for 24 h STXBP1A, CELF4, AHR1B and BAI2 Proinflammatory and cardiovascular toxicity qRT-PCR and Microarray [80]
miR-129−5p, miR-218b, miR-181c Zebrafish Si NPs (62 nm) and PbAc (co-exposure) Si NPs (3 ng/nL) and PbAc (0.5 ng/nL) for 24 h STXBP1A, NDFIP2, CELF24 and GSK3b Calcium homeostasis and ER stress qRT-PCR and Microarray [80]
miR-122, miR-151a, miR-192, miR-193a, miR-194, miR-21, miR-29c Male Sprague Dawley rats Acetaminophen 600 or 1200 mg/kg for 6 or 24 h post-treatment Liver injury qRT-PCR [81]
miR-27a Mugilogobiusabei Diclofenac 0.5, 5, 50, 500 mg/L for 24 and 168 h P-GP Dysfunction of detoxification genes qRT-PCR [82]
miR-33−5q Hy-Line Brown Chicken Cadmium chloride 10 mg/kg for 90 days NF-kB, p-JNK/JNK, p-AKT/AKT and mTOR Ion homeostasis disruption qRT-PCR [83]
miR-455−3p Sprague Dawley Rats Cadmium chloride 0.6 mg/kg for 12 weeks Genes related to cellular signalling pathways Renal injury Microarray and qRT-PCR [84]
miR-N6, miR-N7,
miR-N10
Ciliate Euplotes vannus AgNPs (73.82 nm) 15 mg/L for 1 and 12 h p34CDC2 Increase ROS production, mitochondrial dysfunction qRT-PCR [85]
Let-7b-5p, miR-126−3p, miR16−5p,
miR-320b
Humans (coke oven workers) 23 urinary metals and ten other urinary OH-PAHs 0.0004–0.3934 μg/L range and 0.1–0.9 μg/L range TRIAP1 Genetic damage and oxidative stress qRT-PCR [86]
miR-205, miR-184 miR-419 Cyprinus carpio Atrazine 0.428 μg/L for 8 and 24 h SOX9, GSDF, DMRT, SMAD4 Alterations in reproduction process and developmental process qRT-PCR [57]
miR-125b, miR-125b, miR-155, miR-21 Silver Carp [C8mim] Br 1.095 and 4.380 mg/L for 60 days Inflammatory pathway Oxidative stress and inflammation in the fish spleen qRT-PCR [87]
miR-503 Porcine ZEA 0.17 mg/kg,
1.46 mg/kg and
4.58 mg/kg
SPRED1 Dysregulation of the estrogen response, Wnt and TGF-β1/Smad3 signalling pathways in uterus qRT-PCR, RNA-Sequence and bioinformatic analyses [117]
miR-184, miR-141 Sprague Dawley rats Phthalates 20 μg/kg/day: T1; 200 μg/kg/day: T2;
200 mg/kg/day: T3
WNT9b Delay in prostate development sncRNAs sequencing [88]
miR-35, miR-38, miR-76, miR-354 C.elegans 100 nm nanopolystyrene 1 μg/L from L1-larvae to adult day-3 Alteration in reproduction, development, metabolism, and rhythmic process SOLiD sequencing, qRT-PCR and RNAi assay [89]
miR-34a-5p, miR-497−5p, miR-34a-5p, miR-34a-5p Pigs Ochratoxin A 50 μg/kg and 200 μg/kg feed for 28 days CCND1, BCL2, MAP2K1, TNF-α TP53 signalling network dysregulation Microarray and qRT-PCR [90]
miR-451a Sprague-Dawley rats Si NPs 1.8 mg/kg b.w, 5.4 mg/kg b.w and 16.2 mg/kg b.w for 30 days IL6R, STAT3, ACSL4l, FOS, TXNDC5 Alterations in signalling cascades Immunohistoche-mistry, Western blotting and qRT-PCR [91]
miR-367−3p C57BL/6 mice Melia toosendan Sieb. et Zucc 10 mg/kg for 6 and 12 h Liver injury ChIP analysis, qRT-PCR and Microarray [92]
miR-181a-5p Zebrafish Triclosan 0, 62.5, 125 and 250 mg/L PAX2Aand VASH2 Fatty acid biosynthesis and phosphatidylinositol signalling systems qRT-PCR, Whole-mount in situ hybridisation [87]
miR-24, miR-29a, miR-34a, miR-375 Wistar Albino rats Zinc oxide NPs 5 mg/kg for 15 consecutive days Diabetes development qRT-PCR [93]
miR-223, miR-503, miR-10a, miR-200c Mouse lungs Ricin 7 μg /kg for 24 h BDP1, CREB5, CCL9, JUN Changes in inflammatory pathway qRT-PCR [94]
miR-222 Male BALB/c mice Melia toosendan Sieb. et Zucc 40 g/kg for 9 days intraperitoneally Autophagy pathway Hepatocyte cell death Microarray analysis and qRT-PCR [95]
miR-16, miR-181a-3p, miR-223, miR-451 Silver Carp MC-LR 0, 50 μg/kg, 200 μg/kg for 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h Genes involved in cellular, metabolic and single organism process Multiorgan toxicity Small RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR [96]
miR-155, miR-338, miR-210 Humans Arsenic (form not specified) 0.5−4600 μg/L of arsenic in drinking water DAPK1, EGR2, APP Notch signalling pathway impairment RNA sequencing [97]
miR-199a-3,
miR-152, miR-7b
Carp fish Cadmium dichloride hemipentahydrate 0.25 mg/L for 30 days Oxidative stress RNA sequencing [98]
miR-181, miR-291a-3p, miR-493−5p Sprague Dawley Rats 2,5-hexanedione 400 mg/kg/day for 5 weeks GSK3β, BDNF, MAP1B Neurotoxicity Microarray, qRT-PCR and Western blotting [99]
miR-181a (SPF) C57bl/6 Mice MC-LR 0, 3 or 15 mg/kg from gestation day 6−19 GRP78 Endoplasmic reticulum stress and neuronal apoptosis Microarray, qRT-PCR and Dual luciferase reporter assay [100]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Techniques involved in the study of miRNAs. qRT-PCR - quantitative Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction; NGS – Next Generation Sequencing; LAMP - loop-mediated isothermal amplification; UTR – Untranslated region; HITS-CLIP – High-throughput sequencing of RNA isolated by crosslinking immunoprecipitation; PAR-CLIP – Photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation.

3.1. Carcinogens

BaP, a model polyaromatic hydrocarbon is present in coal tar, tobacco products and some foods, in particular smoked foods, which are well-known for their carcinogenicity. Mostly, aromatic hydrocarbon-induced toxicity is mediated by AHR pathway. An early study conducted by Duan et al. [25] on murine bronchial epithelial cells showed that BaP can induce tumorigenesis by inhibiting CDK6, which plays a key role in G1/S transition using miRNAs (miR-320 and miR-494) . However, further studies on human cell lines did not identify any significant change in these miRNAs upon exposure to BaP. This could be due to variable changes, including the fact that the expression of miRNAs and their regulation has been shown to be spatio-temporal. Interestingly, the other studies consistently showed that miRNAs alteration targets cell proliferation and survival pathways upon exposure to BaP [40]. Similarly, some of the miRNAs (miRNA-29b, miRNA-26a-1, and miRNA-122) have been shown to regulate numerous pathways like cell cycle, apoptosis and DNA damage repair concordantly [27].

Dioxins are a group of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons known to induce various toxicity including cancer. In the mouse model, exposure to dioxin showed alteration in the levels of miR-101a and miR-122. The miR-101a targets the COX2 which catalyses the prostanoid signalling pathway leading to liver damage [66]. Also, miR-122 role in cell proliferation and its alteration upon exposure to xenobiotics has been reported earlier [27]. TCDD in zebrafish embryos disrupted the normal homeostasis development with the deregulation of miRNAs prominently involved in haematopoiesis and cardiovascular development (miR-451, miR-23a, miR-23b, miR-24 and miR-27e). They used a variety of methods to identify the altered miRNAs including microarrays, SOLiD sequencing and qRT-PCR and identified only one miRNA (miR-27e) that was differentially expressed [68]. Bisphenol A is a widely used chemical with endocrine disruption and carcinogenic activity. It alters the miRNA (miR-22) involved in the MAPK pathway by targeting ARRB1, NET1, IL1R1, and HSPA1A in HepG2 cells [16].

An interesting study by Xu et al. (2020) have investigated the miRNA alterations in serum of human subjects who were exposed to increased quantities of PFAS through drinking water. Xu et al. identified that the repression of miR-101−3p, miR-144−3p and miR-19a-3p is in correlation with the target genes that are involved in carcinogenicity, cardiovascular function, and cell proliferation[130]. Circulating miRNAs is being studied recently with the reports of their involvement in various pathologies. This is one of the studies that include the role of exogenous miRNAs in xenobiotic exposure.

3.2. Metals and metalloids

Metals, especially heavy metals, are a major class of environmental contaminants. Research is being conducted to understand the effect of miRNAs in response to metals, including heavy metals, as metals have been known to impair vasculogenesis [101]. Lead, a potent neurotoxicant has been shown to induce BCB leakage in murine choroidal epithelial cells. The mechanistic study showed that the increase in the expression of miR-203 leads to tricellulin mRNA degradation. Tricellulin, a protein in the epithelial cells, helps in the formation of tight junctions in these barriers [36]. Studies on metal-exposed miRNA alterations in pregnant women are scarce. A study by Sanders et al. [72] showed that pregnant women in Mexico had been exposed to heavy metals such as lead and mercury, as evidenced by the presence of lead in the blood (> 5 μg/dL in 10 % of patients) as well as in the patellar and tibia bones. Increased lead exposure during gestation has been related to premature birth. These patients’ cervical cells were collected to identify miRNAs and their correlation with lead concentration. Two notable miRNAs were identified in the blood (miR-297 and miR-188) which target more than 40 genes and 7 miRNAs were found in the patellar bone of lead exposed patients. In the same patients, the effect on miRNAs and its negative association with toenail mercury were also reported, which showed the miRNAs alterations (miR-205, miR-125b, let-7b and miR-200c).

Cadmium is a heavy metal exhibiting nephrotoxicity and possibly carcinogenicity. miRNAs have been identified to play a major role in nephrotoxicity. It modulates various miRNAs upon exposure in human kidney cells. Altered miRNAs are involved in oxidative stress mediated apoptotic cell death and most cancer pathways leading to renal proximal tubular toxicity. One of the most deregulated miRNAs (miR-27a-3p) in this study has been previously reported to induce malignancy in lung and liver cell lines [59]. Furthermore, a study on hen spleen identified that miR-33−5q was repressed by cadmium exposure which bears a negative correlation with the AMPK signalling pathway. AMPK in turn, regulates BNIP3−3 dependent autophagy [83]. In rats, the nephrotoxicity induced by cadmium was found to be regulated by miRNA alteration with 44 miRNAs identified to be dysregulated [84]. In one particular study, where carp was exposed to cadmium, around 15 miRNAs were differentially altered which were identified to be players in cell growth and oxidative stress [98].

Copper, another neurotoxicant, has been shown to induce upregulation of miRNAs (miR-200b-3p, miR-200c-3p, miR-205−5p) in human primary microvascular endothelial cells, where the miRNAs target the suppression of LRP1 protein. The latter plays a significant role in brain Aβ clearances [54].

Arsenic, a metalloid, is one of the major groundwater contaminants which induces numerous health hazards including cardiotoxicity and affects the health of millions of people globally [102]. The mechanism of arsenic toxicity has been well established in both in vitro and in vivo. The epigenetic intervention of miRNAs in arsenic exposure is being explored with very few studies providing us a comprehensive understanding ([103] [116]. Humans are the most affected organisms by arsenic. Two studies focus on the miRNAs perturbations in humans exposed to arsenic. A study conducted by Pérez-Vázquez et al. [77] reported the negative association between arsenic toxicity and plasma miR-126 levels in children. However, the sample size was limited and had too many variables to provide any conclusive proofs. Chen et al. [97] instigated the relation between arsenic and miRNAs in adult females of Bangladesh origin. Bangladesh is one of the leading countries with high levels of arsenic contamination in groundwater. They found major miRNAs that might play a role in various cancer induction genes (miR-155, miR-338, miR-210).

3.3. Nanoparticles

Due to their advantageous physiochemical properties, nanoparticles (NPs) are elaborately used in various sectors including health and personal care products [104]. These NPs ultimately end up in the environment via various routes including air, water and soil leading to various ill-effects to biological systems. NPs enter cells via endocytosis or in ionic form inducing toxicity mainly by generating oxidative stress leading to apoptosis and inflammation [105]. miRNAs have been identified to modulate the pathways involved in oxidative stress. Pulmonary inflammation induced by Al2O3 NPs was identified to be regulated by miR-297 in human bronchial epithelial cells by repression of NF- ҡB-activating protein which activates the notch signalling pathway [62]. Mn NPs have also been identified to induce an inflammatory response by targeting TNF-α and IL-6 through miR-155 in neuronal cells. The decrease in the miR-155 level in Mn NPs exposed cells led to an increase in mRNA levels of TNF-α and IL-6, which was validated by the transfection of miR mimics [45]. Nano polystyrene, a type of plastic widely used in personal care products, is one of the contaminants of emerging concern. Upon exposure to C.elegans, five altered major miRNAs were validated (miR-35, miR-38, miR-76, miR-354, and miR-794) using RNAi assay and were identified to be involved in various signalling pathways including the Wnt pathway [89]. Granulosa cells of hens, when exposed to Zn NPs, differential expression of miRNAs was found and they were predicted to play a major role in the normal development than the usual signalling cascades involved in NPs toxicity [47].

Nanosized SiO2 induced lung damage in rats is due to the disturbance in the inflammatory signalling pathway. This was controlled by miRNAs as evinced by a decreased expression of PDCD4, an anti-inflammatory marker at the protein level, but with little significance in mRNA levels along with the increased expression. Moreover, the raised protein levels of LIN28B, CTGF promote fibrosis formation which is associated with miR-212 and miR-18a [76]. SiO2 NPs have been shown to induce apoptosis via the death receptor pathway in murine spermatocyte cells. In this study, miR-2861 was shown to be repressed, which in turn upregulates the mRNA levels of fas/fasl/ripk1/fadd [56]. Combinatorial effects of SiO2 NPs along with methylmercury and lead acetate in zebrafish provides a pandect on the effects on miRNAs. Along with methylmercury, SiO2 NPs have been demonstrated to reshape the miRNAs threshold (miR-7147, miR-26a and miR-375) in zebrafish embryos (48 hpf) leading to cardiovascular toxicity (i.e., cardiac muscle contraction) via inflammatory pathways [80]. Furthermore, in conjunction with lead acetate, SiO2 NPs cause cardiac muscular contraction leading to cardiovascular toxicity. However, the impaired miRNAs were different and they were found to modulate alternate mechanisms including ER stress and disrupt calcium homeostasis [80].

Silver, iron and gold NPs are some of the most widely used NPs in medicine. All these NPs have been shown to induce toxicity and control gene expression via epigenetic mechanisms, especially by controlling miRNAs. Ag NPs exposure to human jurkat T cells has been shown to induce DNA damage and apoptosis. The miRNAs altered in a study carried out by Eom et al. underwent in silico prediction of miRNA-mRNA network analysis to identify putative pairs [32]. However, unless the prediction of miRNA targets is validated, it is difficult to obtain a conclusive evidence. A similar study was done by Oh et al. [41] in human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem/progenitor cells showed that exposure to citrate-coated Ag NPs alters miRNAs involved in oxidative stress (especially Nrf2 mediated) and inflammatory pathways. Moreover, miR-297, which was previously shown to target NFKBAP in exposure to Al2O3 NPs, here was predicted to target ADAMTS9, and SEMA6D. When ciliates Euplotes vannus was exposed to Ag NPs, they showed similar ill effects including alteration in the cell cycle regulation, induced oxidative stress and antioxidant response modulation with over 15 miRNAs detected to play a possible action in the toxicity [85]. Research done by Huang et al. [38] in Au NPs upon exposure to human dermal fibroblasts showed the alteration of miRNAs prominently in the mRNA processing pathway, and MAPK signalling pathway. A key aspect of the finding is that Au NPs showed no cytotoxic effects even though they altered the levels of numerous miRNAs (i.e., miR-205, miR-21, miR-129−5p, miR-20a, miR-30b, miR-181a, miR-190, miR-16, miR-195, miR-30d, and miR-9) and affected the cell cycle pathway. SPIONs have been shown to induce cell death by targeting the NMDAR-Caspase pathway in PC12 cells leading to neurotoxicity. NMDAR, a receptor which regulates neuronal plasticity, was downregulated in SPIONs exposed cells and miRNAs has been shown to be varied [39]. A recent study compared the effect of three major NPs (i.e., Ag, Au, and SPIONs) in HepG2 cells where the similarity of miRNAs between treated NPs was very low. However, miRNAs altered in these NPs have been previously reported to play a role in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis [106]. An in-silico prediction by Hu et al. [107] identified six major miRNAs that have been found in response to various NPs exposure in zebrafish. These miRNAs include miR-124, miR-144, miR-148, miR-155, miR-19a, and miR-223. It is noteworthy that these miRNAs have been validated earlier in mammalian and zebrafish miRNAs Profiling studies and their predicted targets were found to be interacting with various signalling pathways (as reviewed by [107]). There is no regulation for the accumulation of NPs in the environment, which is of growing concern.

3.4. Biotoxins

Biotoxins are toxins produced by various organisms that have become a threat to human health and the environment. This includes but is not limited to mycotoxins, bacterial toxins, aflatoxins and plant toxins. MCs that are released by cyanobacteria and other algae are one of the major environmental toxins. MC-RR, one of the common and abundant MCs, has been shown to disrupt miRNAs expression in zebrafish embryos leading to cardiotoxicity. The loss of vascular integrity was predicted to be due to miR-31 and miR-126. Apart from these two miRNAs, numerous other miRNAs with known functions in multiple signalling pathways, were identified [65],

Upon exposure to mouse granulosa cells, MC—LR - a form of microcystin–has been shown to alter numerous miRNAs involved in MAPK signalling pathway [48,49]. In human liver cells, differential expression of miRNAs (i.e., miR-451a, miR-4521 and miR-15b-3p) leading to MC—LR induced hepatotoxicity was observed [76]. The same group further validated the role of miR-451a by using miR mimics and observed that the decreased expression of miR-451a by MC—LR is irreversible [52]. This miR-451a plays a role in numerous signalling cascades and has also been shown to be functioning as circulatory miRNAs. In mice, the exposure to MC-LR– even at low dosages– induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common form of non-alcoholic fatty acid liver disease. Deregulation of miRNAs (i.e., miR-12, miR-21, miR-24 and miR-34a) has been identified as oncomirs which leads to hepatocarcinogenesis in NASH [108]. The possible role of miR-541 in MC—LR –induced cell death was studied by Meng et al. [44] using miRNA mimics and inhibitors. They validated the downstream target of miR-541 (p15) in Mouse GC-1 cells by using a dual-luciferase-reporter assay which confirms the interaction between miR-541 and the 3′ UTR region of p15. p15, a CDK inhibitor, is one of the key players involved in cell cycle regulation. Inhibition of p15 by miR-541 leads to the cell death mechanism as evidenced by the findings of the study. Similarly, prenatal exposure to MC—LR in mice leads to ER stress and neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampi region of offspring leading to cognitive impairment. One of the key signalling regulators involved in ER stress is Grp78/BIP, which acts as a chaperone, and was significantly upregulated in treated mice. This was due to the inhibition of miR-181a-5p upon MC—LR exposure, which was supported by the reporter assay [100]. MC—LR has been shown to induce liver toxicity in juvenile silver carp where the unbalanced miRNA levels play a crucial function. Furthermore, systemic toxicity in the carp was predicted due to the upregulation of four miRNAs (i.e., miR-16, miR-181a-3p, miR-223, miR-451) which are the key components of multiple signalling cascades [96].

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by the fungi and most of them have been found as contaminants in animal feed. These–when fed to animals –easily enter the human systems. They have been shown to have varied toxic potency such as mutagenicity, teratogenicity, neurotoxicity as well as carcinogenicity [129].

ZEA is a mycotoxin from Fusarium genera that is one of the widely prevalent toxins. Li et al. [61] investigated the regulatory mechanism of miRNA-ceRNA networks. It is one of the very few studies exploring miRNA-ceRNA networks upon xenobiotic exposure. They studied the effect of ZEA on porcine granulosa cells. Upon exposure to porcine granulosa cells, ZEA arrests the cell cycle at the G2/M phase by targeting the genes involved in the cell cycle including CDK1, CCNB1, CDC25A, and CDC25C. These genes are modulated by various miRNAs (i.e., miR-1839−5p, miR-126a-5p, miR-15a, miR-152, miR-29b, miR-143−3p, and miR-7857−3p) which in turn are being controlled by various lncRNAs. These lncRNAs compete with miRNAs for binding towards these mRNAs, and fine tunes the miRNAs expression. However, the ceRNA hypothesis –which states that ceRNAs can compete with miRNAs for mRNA binding– is controversial and has to be validated further [109]. DON is another toxin of the same category, but more hazardous than ZEA [110]. The combinatorial effect of ZEA and DON on the ascending colon of porcine showed an alteration of miRNAs (i.e., miR-15a, miR-21, miR-34a, and miR-192) involved in the cell cycle, signal transduction and apoptosis. However, the alteration of miRNAs was tissue-specific. The other tissues including liver did not showed any significant changes [73].

Ochratoxin A, is a type of mycotoxin obtained from Aspergillus and Penicillium genera. It is considered as a potential carcinogen exhibiting severe toxicity. Marin et al. [90] reported that ochratoxin A alters miRNA levels in the kidneys of pigs with the identified miRNAs playing a major role in renal damage. The elevated miRNAs (i.e., miR-497, miR-133a-3p, miR-423−3p, miR-34a, miR-542−3p) and repressed miRNAs (i.e., miR-421−3p; miR-490; miR-9840−3p) were predicted for the pathways involved in the TP53 signalling cascade, a prominent pathway in tumorigenesis.

Apart from these mycotoxins, bacterial and plant toxins have also been reported to alter miRNAs. Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B produced by Staphylococcus aureus induces lung damage, and shown to be regulated by two major miRNAs (i.e., miR-222 and miR-494) which target CDKN1b, P27KIP1, and BCL2L11, some of the major genes involved in cell cycle [46]. Ricin, a highly potent toxin classified as a bioterror agent, is isolated from Ricinus communis. Mice, when intoxicated with ricin, show severe damage in the lungs. Transmuted miRNAs were identified in the lungs. These modified miRNA levels were found to have targets in various immune response and immune regulation pathways [94].

3.5. Particulate matter

Particulate matter (PM) is one of the major toxicants in air affecting more than 91 % of the people globally (as reported by WHO) [111]. They can cause various respiratory illnesses including lung cancer, COPD and even cardiovascular diseases. These toxicants are altering the epigenetic landscape [112]. PM2.5 has been shown to dysregulate the miRNAs involved in oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways [55]. Furthermore, it has been shown that it induces cardiotoxicity by altering miRNAs (i.e., miR-128−3p and miR-4306) in which miR-128−3p targets MAPK activity [57]. In zebrafish, PM2.5 has been shown to disrupt homeostasis of miRNA levels, upregulate the miRNAs involved in the inhibition of immune responses and DNA damage repair (i.e., let-7b, miR-153b-3p, miR-122 and miR-24) as well as to downregulate miRNAs that control autophagy (i.e., let-7i, miR-19a-3p, miR-19b-3p and miR-7a) [79]

Cigarette smoking generates a large amount of particulate matter of various sizes which affects both first hand as well as second hand smokers [113]. A study conducted by Xi et al. [114] showed that in human respiratory epithelial cells, cigarette smoke condensate induces the expression of miR-31, one of the key oncomir. Moreover, environmental cigarette smoke has been shown to dysregulate miRNA expression in both liver and lungs of mice with significant alterations in the lungs [115]. Maternal cigarette smoking is a major concern which affects the unborn child. It has been shown to affect the placenta by inhibiting the cell cycle regulation leading to improper placenta development. This is due to the suppression of miR-16, miR-21 and miR-146a in the placenta [64]. However, further studies are needed to address the environmental cigarette smoke (passive or second hand) and their role in miRNA regulation in human subjects.

3.6. Contaminants of emerging concern

Contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) are chemical compounds that are widely present in the environment with recent identification. While no common definition for this term exists, the present review focuses on major chemical compounds that can cause severe health effects in biological systems. Phthalates, is a family of phthalic acid diesters which exhibits endocrine disruption ability. Phthalates are being widely used along with plastics and pose a risk to human health. Scarano et al. [88] reported the effect of a mixture of phthalates from the environment in miRNA levels of pregnant rats. The altered miRNAome and the target prediction indicated that the majority of altered genes involved in inflammation and androgenic toxicity were modulated by miR-143-p and miR-184.

Pesticides are another major CEC with an increased usage in agriculture. Atrazine is one of the more common herbicides used to prevent the growth of broadleaf and grassy weeds. In zebrafish, atrazine exposure altered miRNA levels that participate in various functions including angiogenesis. Wirbisky et al. have identified one key miRNA, namely miR-126−3p that was altered in various dosages [75]. The miR-126 family has been predicted to be involved in various toxicant exposures. The endocrine disrupting ability was further supported by a study done by Wang et al. [50]. In common carp, atrazine exposure at different developmental stages modulated the miRNAs involved in reproductive toxicity. Triclosan, one of the prevalent bactericides, affects the vascular development of zebrafish by upregulating miR-181a-5p levels involved in the phospholipid signalling pathway [87].

4. Challenges

There have been numerous studies on the interaction of miRNAs in various xenobiotics in both in vitro and in vivo of various model systems, including human subjects. However, they pose various challenges as well as limitations for the possible interpretation of data to environmental relevance. Most of the studies have focused on the identification of miRNAs altered through sequencing and predicted their targets in silico. Only very few of them have validated the interaction between miRNA and mRNAs and their role in gene regulation. Quantification of miRNA levels and in silico target prediction alone does not confirm their functional validation. Moreover, one of the interesting observations in xenobiotics-based studies is that though some of the miRNAs share the same pathways leading to toxicity, almost all of the altered miRNAs in various toxicants are different from each other, showing an increased specificity of these miRNAs. Even the similar miRNAs in different toxicant exposures have differed targets interacting with varied signalling pathways. The generalization of these results is very difficult at this stage due to their variability. The variables include dose, time, model systems, tissue specificity, toxicant characteristics and the method of analysis.

Most of the in vitro studies were done using cancer cell lines which might distort miRNAs alteration in normal functioning cells. Human studies have been very limited, and even in the few human studies that have been conducted, sample sizes were on the lower side and focused on a specific set of people. This does not contribute to a deeper understanding of the miRNAs effect on xenobiotic exposure. Furthermore, there are very limited studies that yield a conclusive evidence on the stability of miRNA alteration, whether it is transient or stable over generations.

5. Future directions

Future work should focus on the validation of predicted targets with high specificity and robust methods of identification that will help us in elucidating the exact mechanism of miRNA-xenobiotic perturbations. Meta-analysis of these studies will provide us an in-depth interpretation and comparison for generalization. Another interesting area of research includes miRNA-induced transcription activation and their possible mechanisms. Moreover, circulatory miRNAs and their role in xenobiotic exposure is very limited at this stage. It is one of the unexplored areas which promises an exciting future due to their applications as biomarkers useful in the identification of environmental toxicity. Furthermore, the controversy behind ceRNAs and miRNAs in gene regulation has to be ratified conclusively. Ligorio et al. (2011) predicted the Dicer to play a major role in xenobiotic targets, however there have not been many studies on the effect of toxicants in regulating miRNAs and their biogenesis[131]. These studies possess great potential in explaining xenobiotic toxicity and the possible role of miRNAs as biomarkers.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, this review summarizes the effect of xenobiotics on gene expression via epigenetic regulation of miRNAs both in vitro and in vivo. Most xenobiotic toxicity is induced by the generation of oxidative stress, which leads to the dysregulation in antioxidant response, inflammation and other cell death mechanisms. These alterations are regulated by epigenetic modulation of miRNAs, which targets mRNAs and cause translational repression or degradation. Even with an increased amount of research going on, a lot of complex mechanisms behind miRNA regulation and its role in toxicity still remains largely unexplored.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to apologize to the researchers, whose work were not covered or cited in the review due to specific constraints and acknowledge their contributions. The authors thank the Department of Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Research Board - Empowerment and Equity Opportunities for Excellence in Science (EEQ/2018/000633) and RUSA 2.0-BEICH, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore.

References

  • 1.Mostafalou S., Abdollahi M. Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013;268(2):157–177. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025. Apr 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burgos-Aceves M.A., Cohen A., Paolella G., Lepretti M., Smith Y., Faggio C., Lionetti L. Modulation of mitochondrial functions by xenobiotic-induced microRNA: from environmental sentinel organisms to mammals. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;645:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.109. Dec 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iorio M.V., Piovan C., Croce C.M. Interplay between microRNAs and the epigenetic machinery: an intricate network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2010;1799(10–12):694–701. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.05.005. Oct 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. Jan 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee R.C., Feinbaum R.L., Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y. Dec 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wightman B., Ha I., Ruvkun G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell. 1993;75(5):855–862. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4. Dec 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu H., Lei C., He Q., Pan Z., Xiao D., Tao Y. Nuclear functions of mammalian MicroRNAs in gene regulation, immunity and cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2018;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0765-5. Dec. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lema C., Cunningham M.J. MicroRNAs and their implications in toxicological research. Toxicol. Lett. 2010;198(2):100–105. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.06.019. Oct 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Glaich O., Parikh S., Bell R.E., Mekahel K., Donyo M., Leader Y., Shayevitch R., Sheinboim D., Yannai S., Hollander D., Melamed Z.E. DNA methylation directs microRNA biogenesis in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1) doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13527-1. 1-1. Dec 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee Y., Ahn C., Han J., Choi H., Kim J., Yim J., Lee J., Provost P., Rådmark O., Kim S., Kim V.N. The nuclear RNase III drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature. 2003;425(6956):415–419. doi: 10.1038/nature01957. Sep. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Rie D., Abugessaisa I., Alam T., Arner E., Arner P., Ashoor H., Åström G., Babina M., Bertin N., Burroughs A.M., Carlisle A.J. An integrated expression atlas of miRNAs and their promoters in human and mouse. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35(9):872. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3947. Sep. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yi R., Qin Y., Macara I.G., Cullen B.R. Exportin-5 mediates the nuclear export of pre-microRNAs and short hairpin RNAs. Genes Dev. 2003;17(24):3011–3016. doi: 10.1101/gad.1158803. Dec 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bohnsack M.T., Czaplinski K., GÖRLICH D. Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs. RNA. 2004;10(2):185–191. doi: 10.1261/rna.5167604. Feb 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ketting R.F., Fischer S.E., Bernstein E., Sijen T., Hannon G.J., Plasterk R.H. Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. Elegans. Genes Dev. 2001;15(20):2654–2659. doi: 10.1101/gad.927801. Oct 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kobayashi H., Tomari Y. RISC assembly: coordination between small RNAs and Argonaute proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2016;1859(1):71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.08.007. Jan 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim S.J., Yu SY Yoon H.J., Lee S.Y., Youn J.P., Hwang S.Y. Epigenetic regulation of miR-22 in a BPA-exposed human hepatoma cell. Biochip J. 2015;9(1):76–84. Mar 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guo H., Ingolia N.T., Weissman J.S., Bartel D.P. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature. 2010;466(7308):835–840. doi: 10.1038/nature09267. Aug. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang J., Zhou W., Liu Y., Liu T., Li C., Wang L. Oncogenic role of microRNA-532‑5p in human colorectal cancer via targeting of the 5’UTR of RUNX3. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15(5):7215–7220. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8217. May 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Truesdell S.S., Mortensen R.D., Seo M., Schroeder J.C., Lee J.H., LeTonqueze O., Vasudevan S. MicroRNA-mediated mRNA translation activation in quiescent cells and oocytes involves recruitment of a nuclear microRNP. Sci. Rep. 2012;2:842. doi: 10.1038/srep00842. Nov 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dharap A., Pokrzywa C., Murali S., Pandi G., Vemuganti R. MicroRNA miR-324-3p induces promoter-mediated expression of RelA gene. PLoS One. 2013;8(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baer C., Claus R., Plass C. Genome-wide epigenetic regulation of miRNAs in cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(2):473–477. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3731. Jan 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thind A., Wilson C. Exosomal miRNAs as cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2016;5(1):31292. doi: 10.3402/jev.v5.31292. Jan 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rossi L., Bonmassar E., Faraoni I. Modification of miR gene expression pattern in human colon cancer cells following exposure to 5-fluorouracil in vitro. Pharmacol. Res. 2007;56(3):248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.07.001. Sep 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paul S., Kim S.J., Park H.W., Lee S.Y., An Y.R., Oh M.J., Jung J.W., Hwang S.Y. Alteration in miRNA expression profiling with response to nonylphenol in human cell lines. Cell. 2009;20:0. Mar 31. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Duan H., Jiang Y., Zhang H., Wu Y. MiR-320 and miR-494 affect cell cycles of primary murine bronchial epithelial cells exposed to benzo [a] pyrene. Toxicol. Vitr. 2010;24(3):928–935. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.11.013. Apr 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bolleyn J., Fraczek J., Vinken M., Lizarraga D., Gaj S., van Delft J.H., Rogiers V., Vanhaecke T. Effect of Trichostatin A on miRNA expression in cultures of primary rat hepatocytes. Toxicol. Vitr. 2011;25(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.04.013. Sep 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lizarraga D., Gaj S., Brauers K.J., Timmermans L., Kleinjans J.C., van Delft J.H. Benzo [a] pyrene-induced changes in MicroRNA–mRNA networks. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012;25(4):838–849. doi: 10.1021/tx2003799. Apr 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu L., Qin W., Zhang H., Wang Y., Dou H., Yu D., Ding Y., Yang L., Wang Y. Alterations in microRNA expression linked to microcystin-LR-induced tumorigenicity in human WRL-68 Cells. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2012;743(1–2):75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.12.024. Mar 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lo T.F., Tsai W.C., Chen S.T. MicroRNA-21-23p, a berberine-induced miRNA, directly down-regulates human methionine adenosyltransferases 2A and 2B and inhibits hepatoma cell growth. PLoS One. 2013;8(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song M.K., Choi H.S., Lee H.S., Kim Y.J., Park Y.K., Ryu J.C. Analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression profiles highlights alterations in modulation of the MAPK pathway under octanal exposure. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014;37(1):84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2013.11.005. Jan 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takahashi K., Tatsumi N., Fukami T., Yokoi T., Nakajima M. Integrated analysis of rifampicin-induced microRNA and gene expression changes in human hepatocytes. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2014 doi: 10.2133/dmpk.dmpk-13-rg-114. DMPK-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eom H.J., Chatterjee N., Lee J., Choi J. Integrated mRNA and micro RNA profiling reveals epigenetic mechanism of differential sensitivity of Jurkat T cells to AgNPs and Ag ions. Toxicol. Lett. 2014;229(1):311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.05.019. Aug 17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang Q., Xu E., Dai J., Wu J., Zhang S., Peng B. Jiang Y. miR-21 regulates N-methyl-N-nitro-N′-nitrosoguanidine-induced gastric tumorigenesis by targeting FASLG and BTG2. Toxicol. Lett. 2014;228(3):147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.05.005. Aug 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Twaroski D.M., Yan Y., Olson J.M., Bosnjak Z.J., Bai X. Down-regulation of microRNA-21 is involved in the propofol-induced neurotoxicity observed in human stem cell–derived neurons. Anesthesiology: J. Am. Soc. Anesthesiolog. 2014;121(4):786–800. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000345. Oct 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Segal C.V., Koufaris C., Powell C., Gooderham N.J. Effects of treatment with androgen receptor ligands on microRNA expression of prostate cancer cells. Toxicology. 2015;333:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.04.002. Jul 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Su P., Zhao F., Cao Z., Zhang J., Aschner M., Luo W. Mir-203-mediated tricellulin mediates lead-induced in vitro loss of blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) function. Toxicol. Vitr. 2015;29(5):1185–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.05.002. Aug 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu C., Guo H., Cheng X., Shao M., Wu C., Wang S., Li H., Wei L., Gao Y., Tan W., Cheng S. Exposure to airborne PM2. 5 suppresses microRNA expression and deregulates target oncogenes that cause neoplastic transformation in NIH3T3 cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6(30):29428. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5005. Oct 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang Y., Qu L.üX., Yang Y., Wu S. MicroRNA sequencing and molecular mechanisms analysis of the effects of gold nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2015;37:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.042. Jan 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sun B., Liu R., Ye N., Xiao Z.D. Comprehensive evaluation of microRNA expression profiling reveals the neural signaling specific cytotoxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) through N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. PLoS One. 2015;10(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Marrone A.K., Tryndyak V., Beland F.A., Pogribny I.P. MicroRNA responses to the genotoxic carcinogens aflatoxin B1 and benzo [a] pyrene in human HepaRG cells. Toxicol. Sci. 2016;149(2):496–502. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv253. Feb 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oh J.H., Son M.Y., Choi M.S., Kim S., Choi A.Y., Lee H.A., Kim K.S., Kim J., Song C.W., Yoon S. Integrative analysis of genes and miRNA alterations in human embryonic stem cells-derived neural cells after exposure to silver nanoparticles. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2016;299:8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.11.004. May 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yamashita Y., Asakura M., Mitsugi R., Fujii H., Nagai K., Atsuda K., Itoh T., Fujiwara R. MicroRNA expression in the vildagliptin-treated two-and three-dimensional HepG2 cells. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2016;31(3):201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2016.02.004. Jun 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oenarto J., Karababa A., Castoldi M., Bidmon H.J., Görg B., Häussinger D. Ammonia-induced miRNA expression changes in cultured rat astrocytes. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1):1–2. doi: 10.1038/srep18493. Jan 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Meng X., Zhang L., Chen X., Xiang Z., Li D. Han X. miR-541 contributes to Microcystin-LR-induced reproductive toxicity through regulating the expression of p15 in mice. Toxins. 2016;8(9):260. doi: 10.3390/toxins8090260. Sep. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Grogg M.W., Braydich-Stolle L.K., Maurer-Gardner E.I., Hill N.T., Sakaram S., Kadakia M.P., Hussain S.M. Modulation of miRNA-155 alters manganese nanoparticle-induced inflammatory response. Toxicol. Res. (Camb) 2016;5(6):1733–1743. doi: 10.1039/c6tx00208k. Nov 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Elliott D.M., Nagarkatti M., Nagarkatti P.S. 3, 3′-Diindolylmethane ameliorates staphylococcal enterotoxin B–Induced acute lung injury through alterations in the expression of MicroRNA that target apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in activated t cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2016;357(1):177–187. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.226563. Apr 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhao Y., Li L., Min L.J., Zhu L.Q., Sun Q.Y., Zhang H.F., Liu X.Q., Zhang W.D., Ge W., Wang J.J., Liu J.C. Regulation of MicroRNAs, and the correlations of MicroRNAs and their targeted genes by zinc oxide nanoparticles in ovarian granulosa cells. PLoS One. 2016;11(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ma J., Li Y., Yao L., Li X. Analysis of microRNA expression profiling involved in MC-LR-induced cytotoxicity by high-throughput sequencing. Toxins. 2017;9(1):23. doi: 10.3390/toxins9010023. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li X., Zhuang X., Xu T., Mao M., Wang C., Chen Y., Han X., Wu J. Expression analysis of microRNAs and mRNAs in ovarian granulosa cells after microcystin-LR exposure. Toxicon. 2017;129:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.01.022. Apr 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Q., Zhan Y., Ren N., Wang Z., Zhang Q., Wu S., Li H. Paraquat and MPTP alter microRNA expression profiles, and downregulated expression of miR‐17‐5p contributes to PQ‐induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2018;38(5):665–677. doi: 10.1002/jat.3571. May. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jeong M.H., Bang I.J., Kim H.R., Chung K.H. MicroRNA regulatory networks reflective of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate-induced fibrosis in A549 human alveolar adenocarcinoma cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2018;287:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.01.010. May 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang F., Wen C., Zheng S., Yang S., Chen J., Feng X. Involvement of MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway in microcystin-induced microfilament reorganization in HL7702 hepatocytes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A. 2018;81(21):1135–1141. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1532715. Nov 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gufford B.T., Robarge J.D., Eadon M.T., Gao H., Lin H., Liu Y., Desta Z., Skaar T.C. Rifampin modulation of xeno‐and endobiotic conjugating enzyme mRNA expression and associated micro RNA s in human hepatocytes. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2018;6(2) doi: 10.1002/prp2.386. Apr. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hsu H.W., Rodriguez-Ortiz C.J., Lim S.L., Zumkehr J., Kilian J.G., Vidal J., Kitazawa M. Copper-induced upregulation of microRNAs directs the suppression of endothelial LRP1 in Alzheimer’s disease model. Toxicol. Sci. 2019;170(1):144–156. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz084. Jul 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Veerappan I., Sankareswaran S.K., Palanisamy R. Morin Protects Human Respiratory Cells from PM2. 5 Induced Genotoxicity by Mitigating ROS and Reverting Altered miRNA Expression. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(13):2389. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132389. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ren L., Zhang J., Wang J., Wei J., Liu J., Li X., Zhu Y., Li Y., Guo C., Duan J., Sun Z. Silica nanoparticles induce spermatocyte cell apoptosis through microRNA-2861 targeting death receptor pathway. Chemosphere. 2019;228:709–720. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.116. Aug 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang F., Yang Q.W., Zhao W.J., Du Q.Y., Chang Z.J. Effects of short-time exposure to atrazine on miRNA expression profiles in the gonad of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5896-6. Dec. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Łuczkowska K., Rogińska D., Ulańczyk Z., Paczkowska E., Schmidt C.A., Machaliński B. Molecular mechanisms of bortezomib action: novel evidence for the miRNA–mRNA interaction involvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(1):350. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010350. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lemaire J., Van der Hauwaert C., Savary G., Dewaeles E., Perrais M., Lo Guidice J.M., Pottier N., Glowacki F., Cauffiez C. Cadmium-induced renal cell toxicity is associated with MicroRNA deregulation. Int. J. Toxicol. 2020 doi: 10.1177/1091581819899039. Jan 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bas-Orth C., Koch M., Lau D., Buchthal B., Bading H. A microRNA signature of toxic extrasynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor signaling. Mol. Brain. 2020;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s13041-020-0546-0. 1-0. Dec. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li N., Liu X.L., Zhang F.L., Tian Y., Zhu M., Meng L.Y., Dyce P.W., Shen W., Li L. Whole-transcriptome analysis of the toxic effects of zearalenone exposure on ceRNA networks in porcine granulosa cells. Environ. Pollut. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114007. Jan 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yun J., Yang H., Li X., Sun H., Xu J., Meng Q., Wu S., Zhang X., Yang X., Li B., Chen R. Up-regulation of miR-297 mediates aluminum oxide nanoparticle-induced lung inflammation through activation of Notch pathway. Environ. Pollut. 2020;259 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113839. Apr 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fukushima T., Hamada Y., Yamada H., Horii I. Changes of micro-RNA expression in rat liver treated by acetaminophen or carbon tetrachloride− regulating role of micro-rna for RNA expression−. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2007;32(4):401–409. doi: 10.2131/jts.32.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Maccani M.A., Avissar-Whiting M., Banister C.E., McGonnigal B., Padbury J.F., Marsit C.J. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with downregulation of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-146a in the placenta. Epigenetics. 2010;5(7):583–589. doi: 10.4161/epi.5.7.12762. Oct 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhao Y., Xiong Q., Xie P. Analysis of microRNA expression in embryonic developmental toxicity induced by MC-RR. PLoS One. 2011;6(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yoshioka W., Higashiyama W., Tohyama C. Involvement of microRNAs in dioxin-induced liver damage in the mouse. Toxicol. Sci. 2011;122(2):457–465. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr130. Aug 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhao Y., Xie P., Fan H. Genomic profiling of microRNAs and proteomics reveals an early molecular alteration associated with tumorigenesis induced by MC-LR in mice. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46(1):34–41. doi: 10.1021/es201514h. Jan 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jenny M.J., Aluru N., Hahn M.E. Effects of short-term exposure to 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on microRNA expression in zebrafish embryos. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012;264(2):262–273. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.08.007. Oct 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Vacchi-Suzzi C., Bauer Y., Berridge B.R., Bongiovanni S., Gerrish K., Hamadeh H.K., Letzkus M., Lyon J., Moggs J., Paules R.S., Pognan F. Perturbation of microRNAs in rat heart during chronic doxorubicin treatment. PLoS One. 2012;7(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Li X., Ma J., Fang Q., Li Y. Transcription alterations of microRNAs, cytochrome P4501A1 and 3A65, and AhR and PXR in the liver of zebrafish exposed to crude microcystins. Toxicon. 2013;73:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.07.002. Oct 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.De Felice B., Manfellotto F., Palumbo A., Troisi J., Zullo F., Di Carlo C., Sardo A.D., De Stefano N., Ferbo U., Guida M., Guida M. Genome–wide microRNA expression profiling in placentas from pregnant women exposed to BPA. BMC Med. Genomics. 2015;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0131-z. Dec 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sanders A.P., Burris H.H., Just A.C., Motta V., Amarasiriwardena C., Svensson K., Oken E., Solano-Gonzalez M., Mercado-Garcia A., Pantic I., Schwartz J. Altered miRNA expression in the cervix during pregnancy associated with lead and mercury exposure. Epigenomics. 2015;7(6):885–896. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.54. Sep. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brzuzan P., Woźny M., Wolińska-Nizioł L., Piasecka A., Florczyk M., Jakimiuk E., Góra M., Łuczyński M.K., Gajęcki M. MicroRNA expression profiles in liver and colon of sexually immature gilts after exposure to Fusarium mycotoxins. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2015;18(1):29–38. doi: 10.1515/pjvs-2015-0004. Mar 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nan A., Zhou X., Chen L., Liu M., Zhang N., Zhang L., Luo Y., Liu Z., Dai L., Jiang Y. A transcribed ultraconserved noncoding RNA, Uc. 173, is a key molecule for the inhibition of lead-induced neuronal apoptosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(1):112. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6590. Jan 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wirbisky S.E., Weber G.J., Schlotman K.E., Sepúlveda M.S., Freeman J.L. Embryonic atrazine exposure alters zebrafish and human miRNAs associated with angiogenesis, cancer, and neurodevelopment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016;98:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.03.027. Dec 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yang H., Zhang Y., Li W., Lao C., Li M., Zheng Y. Altered microRNA expression profiles in lung damage induced by nanosized SiO2. Bioengineered. 2017;8(1):45–54. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1227578. Jan 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pérez-Vázquez M.S., Ochoa-Martínez ÁC., RuÍz-Vera T., Araiza-Gamboa Y., Pérez-Maldonado I.N. Evaluation of epigenetic alterations (mir-126 and mir-155 expression levels) in Mexican children exposed to inorganic arsenic via drinking water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. - Int. 2017;24(36):28036–28045. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0367-6. Dec 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hassani F.V., Mehri S., Abnous K., Birner-Gruenberger R., Hosseinzadeh H. Protective effect of crocin on BPA-induced liver toxicity in rats through inhibition of oxidative stress and downregulation of MAPK and MAPKAP signaling pathway and miRNA-122 expression. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017;107:395–405. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.007. Sep 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Duan J., Yu Y., Li Y., Jing L., Yang M., Wang J., Li Y., Zhou X., Miller M.R., Sun Z. Comprehensive understanding of PM2. 5 on gene and microRNA expression patterns in zebrafish (Danio rerio) model. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;586:666–674. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.042. May 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hu H., Shi Y., Zhang Y., Wu J., Asweto C.O., Feng L., Yang X., Duan J., Sun Z. Comprehensive gene and microRNA expression profiling on cardiovascular system in zebrafish co-exposured of SiNPs and MeHg. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;607:795–805. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.036. Dec 31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hwang S.R., Tham N.T., Lee S.H., Bang J.H., Yi H., Park Y.I., Lee S.H.K., Kang H.G., Kim Y.S., Woo G.H., Ku H.O. Comparison of microRNA expressions for the identification of chemical hazards in in vivo and in vitro hepatic injury models. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2019;39(2):333–342. doi: 10.1002/jat.3722. Feb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ku P., Wang C., Nie X., Ou R., Li K. Regulation of pregnane-X-receptor and microRNAs on detoxification-related genes expressions in Mugilogobius abei under the exposure to diclofenac. Environ. Pollut. 2018;233:395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.080. Feb 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chen M., Li X., Fan R., Yang J., Jin X., Hamid S., Xu S. Cadmium induces BNIP3-dependent autophagy in chicken spleen by modulating miR-33-AMPK axis. Chemosphere. 2018;194:396–402. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.026. Mar 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Fay M.J., Alt L.A., Ryba D., Salamah R., Peach R., Papaeliou A., Zawadzka S., Weiss A., Patel N., Rahman A., Stubbs-Russell Z. Cadmium nephrotoxicity is associated with altered microRNA expression in the rat renal cortex. Toxics. 2018;6(1):16. doi: 10.3390/toxics6010016. Mar. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pan Y., Zhang W., Lin S. Transcriptomic and microRNAomic profiling reveals molecular mechanisms to cope with silver nanoparticle exposure in the ciliate Euplotes vannus. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2018;5(12):2921–2935. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Deng Q., Dai X., Feng W., Huang S., Yuan Y., Xiao Y., Zhang Z., Deng N., Deng H., Zhang X., Kuang D. Co-exposure to metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, microRNA expression, and early health damage in coke oven workers. Environ. Int. 2019;122:369–380. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.056. Jan 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ma J., Chen X., Xin G., Li X. Chronic exposure to the ionic liquid [C8mim] Br induces inflammation in silver carp spleen: involvement of oxidative stress-mediated p38MAPK/NF-κB signalling and microRNAs. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;84:627–638. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.09.052. Jan 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Scarano W.R., Bedrat A., Alonso-Costa L.G., Aquino A.M., Fantinatti B.E., Justulin L.A., Barbisan L.F., Freire P.P., Flaws J.A., Lemos B. Exposure to an environmentally relevant phthalate mixture during prostate development induces microRNA upregulation and transcriptome modulation in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2019;171(1):84–97. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz141. Sep 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Qu M., Luo L., Yang Y., Kong Y., Wang D. Nanopolystyrene-induced microRNAs response in Caenorhabditis elegans after long-term and lose-dose exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;697 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134131. Dec 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Marin D.E., Braicu C., Dumitrescu G., Pistol G.C., Cojocneanu R., Neagoe I.B., Taranu I. MicroRNA profiling in kidney in pigs fed ochratoxin A contaminated diet. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;184 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109637. Nov 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Feng L., Yang X., Liang S., Xu Q., Miller M.R., Duan J., Sun Z. Silica nanoparticles trigger the vascular endothelial dysfunction and prethrombotic state via miR-451 directly regulating the IL6R signaling pathway. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2019;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12989-019-0300-x. Dec 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yang F., Li L., Yang R., Wei M., Sheng Y., Ji L. Identification of serum microRNAs as potential toxicological biomarkers for toosendanin-induced liver injury in mice. Phytomedicine. 2019;58 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152867. May 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Othman M.S., Hafez M.M., Moneim A.E. The potential role of zinc oxide nanoparticles in MicroRNAs dysregulation in STZ-Induced type 2 diabetes in rats. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019;17:1–3. doi: 10.1007/s12011-019-02012-x. Dec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pillar N., Haguel D., Grad M., Shapira G., Yoffe L., Shomron N. Characterization of MicroRNA and gene expression profiles following ricin intoxication. Toxins. 2019;11(5):250. doi: 10.3390/toxins11050250. May. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yu L., Zheng J., Li J., Wang Y., Lu X., Fan X. Integrating serum exosomal microRNA and liver microRNA profiles disclose the function role of autophagy and mechanisms of Fructus Meliae Toosendan-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;123 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109709. Mar 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Feng Y., Chen X., Ma J., Zhang B., Li X. Aberrant expressional profiling of known MicroRNAs in the liver of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) following Microcystin-LR exposure based on samllRNA sequencing. Toxins. 2020;12(1):41. doi: 10.3390/toxins12010041. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen Q.Y., Shen S., Sun H., Wu F., Kluz T., Kibriya M.G., Chen Q.Y., Ahsan H., Costa M. PBMC gene expression profiles of female Bangladeshi adults chronically exposed to arsenic-contaminated drinking water. Environ. Pollut. 2020;259 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113672. Apr 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fu J., Wang M., Chaudhry M.T., Tian Y., Liu C. Combined RNA-Seq with small RNA revealed ribosome biogenesis and oxidative stress associated with cadmium response in carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Hepato-pancreas. Aquaculture. 2020;518 Mar 15. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Piao F., Chen Y., Yu L., Shi X., Liu X., Jiang L., Yang G., Wang N., Gao B., Zhang C. 2, 5-hexanedione-induced deregulation of axon-related microRNA expression in rat nerve tissues. Toxicol. Lett. 2020;320:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.11.019. Mar 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Liu J., Huang Y., Cai F., Dang Y., Liu C., Wang J. MicroRNA-181a regulates endoplasmic reticulum stress in offspring of mice following prenatal microcystin-LR exposure. Chemosphere. 2020;(240) doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124905. Feb 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vimalraj S., Sumantran V.N., Chatterjee S. MicroRNAs: impaired vasculogenesis in metal induced teratogenicity. Reprod. Toxicol. 2017;70:30–48. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.02.014. Jun 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Pilsner J.R., Hall M.N., Liu X., Ahsan H., Ilievski V., Slavkovich V., Levy D., Factor-Litvak P., Graziano J.H., Gamble M.V. Associations of plasma selenium with arsenic and genomic methylation of leukocyte DNA in Bangladesh. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011;119(1):113–118. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1001937. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bjørklund G., Aaseth J., Chirumbolo S., Urbina M.A., Uddin R. Effects of arsenic toxicity beyond epigenetic modifications. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2018;40(3):955–965. doi: 10.1007/s10653-017-9967-9. Jun 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Smolkova B., El Yamani N., Collins A.R., Gutleb A.C., Dusinska M. Nanoparticles in food. Epigenetic changes induced by nanomaterials and possible impact on health. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015;77:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.12.015. Mar 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dusinska M., Magdolenova Z., Fjellsbø L.M. InNanotechnology for Nucleic Acid Delivery. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2013. Toxicological aspects for nanomaterial in humans; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Brzóska K., Grądzka I., Kruszewski M. Silver, gold, and iron oxide nanoparticles alter miRNA expression but do not affect DNA methylation in HepG2 cells. Materials. 2019;12(7):1038. doi: 10.3390/ma12071038. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hu M., Jovanović B., Palić D. Toxicology in Vitro; 2019. In Silico Prediction of MicroRNA Role in Regulation of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Responses to Nanoparticle Exposure. May 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.He J., Li G., Chen J., Lin J., Zeng C., Chen J., Deng J., Xie P. Prolonged exposure to low-dose microcystin induces nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice: a systems toxicology study. Arch. Toxicol. 2017;91(1):465–480. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1681-3. Jan 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gebert L.F., MacRae I.J. Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20(1):21–37. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0045-7. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pinton P., Nougayrède J.P., Del Rio J.C., Moreno C., Marin D.E., Ferrier L., Bracarense A.P., Kolf-Clauw M., Oswald I.P. The food contaminant deoxynivalenol, decreases intestinal barrier permeability and reduces claudin expression. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009;237(1):41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.03.003. May 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Shukla K., Kumar P., Mann G.S., Khare M. Mapping spatial distribution of particulate matter using Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting at supersites of megacity Delhi. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020;54 Mar 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Cheng M., Wang B., Yang M., Ma J., Ye Z., Xie L., Zhou M., Chen W. microRNAs expression in relation to particulate matter exposure: a systematic review. Environ. Pollut. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113961. Jan 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gerber A., Bigelow A., Schulze M., Groneberg D.A. Brand cigarillos—a cheap and less harmful alternative to cigarettes? Particulate matter emissions suggest otherwise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(1):428–438. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120100428. Jan. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Xi S., Yang M., Tao Y., Xu H., Shan J., Inchauste S., Zhang M., Mercedes L., Hong J.A., Rao M., Schrump D.S. Cigarette smoke induces C/EBP-β-mediated activation of miR-31 in normal human respiratory epithelia and lung cancer cells. PLoS One. 2010;5(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Izzotti A., Calin G.A., Steele V.E., Cartiglia C., Longobardi M., Croce C.M., De Flora S. Chemoprevention of cigarette smoke–induced alterations of microRNA expression in rat lungs. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010;3(1):62–72. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0202. Jan 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cardoso A.P., Al-Eryani L., States J.C. Arsenic-induced carcinogenesis: the impact of miRNA dysregulation. Toxicol. Sci. 2018;165(2):284–290. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy128. Oct 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Grenier B., Hackl M., Skalicky S., Thamhesl M., Moll W.D., Berrios R., Schatzmayr G., Nagl V. MicroRNAs in porcine uterus and serum are affected by zearalenone and represent a new target for mycotoxin biomarker discovery. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):1–4. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45784-x. Jun 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Shimpi P.C., More V.R., Paranjpe M., Donepudi A.C., Goodrich J.M., Dolinoy D.C., Rubin B., Slitt A.L. Hepatic lipid accumulation and Nrf2 expression following perinatal and peripubertal exposure to bisphenol A in a mouse model of nonalcoholic liver disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017;125(8) doi: 10.1289/EHP664. Aug 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Yang S., Chen L., Wen C., Zhang X., Feng X., Yang F. MicroRNA expression profiling involved in MC-LR-induced hepatotoxicity using high-throughput sequencing analysis. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A. 2018;81(5):89–97. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2017.1415580. Mar 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kuiper-Goodman T., Scott P.M. Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. 1989;2(3):179–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Xu Y., Jurkovic-Mlakar S., Li Y., Wahlberg K., Scott K., Pineda D., Lindh C.H., Jakobsson K., Engstrom K. Association between serum concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and expression of serum microRNAs in a cohort highly exposed to PFAS from drinking water. Environment International. 2020;136:105446. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Ligorio M., Izotti A., Pulliero A., Arrigo P. Mutagens Interfere With microRNA Maturation by Inhibiting DICER. An in Silico Biology Analysis. Mutation Research. 2011;717(1–2):116–128. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhang B., Pan X. RDX Induces Aberrant Expression of MicroRNAs in Mouse Brain and Liver. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2009;117(2):231–240. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Toxicology Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES