Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Mar 31;20(5):3098–3105. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05082

Terahertz Excitonics in Carbon Nanotubes: Exciton Autoionization and Multiplication

Filchito Renee G Bagsican †, Michael Wais ‡,§, Natsumi Komatsu ∥, Weilu Gao ∥, Lincoln W Weber ⊥, Kazunori Serita †, Hironaru Murakami †, Karsten Held ‡, Frank A Hegmann #, Masayoshi Tonouchi †, Junichiro Kono †,§,∥,∇,○, Iwao Kawayama †,△,*, Marco Battiato §,*
PMCID: PMC7227006  PMID: 32227963

Abstract

graphic file with name nl9b05082_0005.jpg

Excitons play major roles in optical processes in modern semiconductors, such as single-wall carbon nanotubes (CNTs), transition metal dichalcogenides, and 2D perovskite quantum wells. They possess extremely large binding energies (>100 meV), dominating absorption and emission spectra even at high temperatures. The large binding energies imply that they are stable, that is, hard to ionize, rendering them seemingly unsuited for optoelectronic devices that require mobile charge carriers, especially terahertz emitters and solar cells. Here, we have conducted terahertz emission and photocurrent studies on films of aligned single-chirality semiconducting CNTs and find that excitons autoionize, i.e., spontaneously dissociate into electrons and holes. This process naturally occurs ultrafast (<1 ps) while conserving energy and momentum. The created carriers can then be accelerated to emit a burst of terahertz radiation when a dc bias is applied, with promising efficiency in comparison to standard GaAs-based emitters. Furthermore, at high bias, the accelerated carriers acquire high enough kinetic energy to create secondary excitons through impact exciton generation, again in a fully energy and momentum conserving fashion. This exciton multiplication process leads to a nonlinear photocurrent increase as a function of bias. Our theoretical simulations based on nonequilibrium Boltzmann transport equations, taking into account all possible scattering pathways and a realistic band structure, reproduce all of our experimental data semiquantitatively. These results not only elucidate the momentum-dependent ultrafast dynamics of excitons and carriers in CNTs but also suggest promising routes toward terahertz excitonics despite the orders-of-magnitude mismatch between the exciton binding energies and the terahertz photon energies.

Keywords: carbon nanotubes, photoconductive antenna, terahertz emission, exciton dynamics, Boltzmann equation, out-of-equilibrium modeling

The advent of modern low-dimensional semiconductor materials has opened up exciting possibilities for developing novel optoelectronic devices, utilizing their uniquely tunable optical properties which arise from unconventional degrees of freedom such as chirality, valley index, layer number, and twist angle. In particular, single-wall carbon nanotubes (CNTs) provide ideal one-dimensional (1D) semiconductors whose properties depend on the chirality and diameter.1 Recent seminal advances in enriching chiralities2 and achieving alignment3,4 on a macroscopic scale promise large-scale applications of CNT transistors, light-emitting diodes, and photodetectors. Furthermore, the 1D nature of CNTs implies a highly restricted phase space for scattering, which in turn leads to ultrahigh carrier mobilities, suitable for high-frequency devices including terahertz (THz) emitters.5,6 Therefore, aligned and single-chirality CNT films are promising candidates for attaining electronic, THz, and optoelectronic functions on the same platform.

However, characteristic of low-dimensional semiconductors is their enormously enhanced exciton binding, compared to their higher dimensional counterparts.7−11 The typical exciton binding energies of semiconducting CNTs exceed 300 meV,1,12−14 as compared to 1–10 meV in typical bulk semiconductors. This means that excitons in these semiconductors are very difficult to ionize, casting serious doubt about their abilities to generate THz radiation in response to an external electric field because excitons are charge-neutral particles. Namely, to produce THz radiation efficiently, one needs to photogenerate charged free carriers that can be accelerated by an external field. From this point of view, undoped low-dimensional semiconductors with huge exciton binding energies do not seem to be promising as optically excited THz emitters.

Here, we report on our finding that a photoconductive antenna (PCA) made from a film of aligned single-chirality semiconducting CNTs is an unexpectedly efficient THz emitter. Without any optimization, we demonstrate that the produced THz intensities are only 1 order of magnitude lower than a state-of-the-art GaAs PCA. Furthermore, the CNT-based THz emitter can be easily fabricated on a variety of flexible substrates and is expected to be applied to compact THz analysis systems and wearable optoelectronics. The THz intensity is resonantly enhanced through an interband exciton resonance, indicating the importance of excitons in the THz generation process. To explain these observations, we developed a detailed microscopic model describing the strongly out-of-equilibrium dynamics and complex interplay of free carriers, excitons, photons, and phonons. We took into account all energy and momentum conserving scattering processes with realistic band dispersions. Through this, we shed light on a range of long-standing issues in CNT ultrafast dynamics. Importantly, we show that E22 excitons autoionize into free carriers right after the laser excitation. We find multiexciton generation through exciton impact generation to be efficient at high bias. This process explains the nonlinear bias dependence of the simultaneously measured DC photocurrent.

We fabricated a dipole-type PCA structure (Figure 1a) on top of a highly aligned and chirality-enriched (6,5) CNT film deposited on a sapphire substrate (see the Supporting Information). The nanotube alignment direction was aligned with the dipole gap during the fabrication process, so the applied DC electric field was parallel to the nanotube alignment direction (Figure 1a). The electrodes attached on the PCA structure were used to apply the DC bias and to measure the generated photocurrent at the same time (Figure 1a). A separate low-temperature (LT)-GaAs PCA switch was used to detect the generated THz radiation in a transmission configuration (Figure 1a). We used an optical parametric oscillator as the wavelength-tunable excitation source or pump.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic diagram of (a) the CNT-based photoconductive antenna switch and experimental setup. The CNTs are aligned with the direction of applied electric field. (b) THz emission waveforms at forward and reverse biases. (c) Absorbance spectrum for (6,5) CNT film plotted with the THz emission amplitude (red spheres) and photocurrent (blue spheres) as a function of photon energy. (d) THz amplitude and photocurrent as a function of angle between excitation femtosecond (fs) laser polarization and CNT alignment.

We excited the aligned CNTs around the E22 exciton resonance for (6,5) CNTs.15,16 Despite the fact that uncharged excitons are excited, a strong THz signal immediately appeared (Figure 1b). The THz signal reversed its sign when the polarity of the applied bias was switched, confirming that the THz radiation is associated with a transient current parallel to the CNTs. We then probed the dependence of both THz emission and photocurrent on the pump laser photon energy (Figure 1c), as well as its polarization (Figure 1d). Both closely follow the behavior of the E22 exciton absorption, which peaks at 2.14 eV and gets excited only by light polarized parallel to the nanotube axis. This further confirms that the THz generation process is initially triggered by the generation of excitons.

Parts a and b of Figure 2 show the THz emission amplitude, as well as its spectrum, for our CNT device relative to that of a LT-GaAs-based PCA. After considering the losses due to absorbance and reflectance (see the Supporting Information), the emission efficiency (per thickness and absorbed power) of the CNT-based PCA is comparable within an order of magnitude to that of the LT-GaAs PCA. This is an excellent achievement for a prototype unoptimized device compared to the well-established THz emitter based on a conventional LT-GaAs PCA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Relative THz emission from CNT-based PCA and LT-GaAs-based PCA in (a) time and (b) frequency domains. Bias (c) and pump power (d) dependence of photocurrent and THz emission from CNTs compared to same data from LT-GaAs-based PCA (insets).

We also carried out pump-intensity- and bias-dependent measurements. At a fixed pump intensity, both THz amplitude and photocurrent showed direct proportionality to the absorbance, with no apparent changes in the THz waveforms and spectra (see the Supporting Information for details). However, we observed striking differences between THz emission and photocurrent in their pump power and bias dependences. As shown in Figure 2c and d, the THz amplitude shows a linear dependence on both the pump power and bias, whereas the photocurrent saturates at high pump powers and increases superlinearly with the bias. This is in direct contrast with the LT-GaAs device wherein both THz emission and photocurrent always show the same behavior.

This difference in the bias dependence of THz and photocurrent suggests the emergence of new mechanisms for generating charged carriers in CNTs compared to typical PCAs. To provide a microscopic picture, we need to be able to accurately study the thermalization dynamics of several types of quasiparticles (electrons, excitons, photons, and phonons) within realistic band structure and in the presence of an external electric field. Describing the thermalization dynamics is particularly challenging: it requires full computation of far out-of-equilibrium scattering processes. The most critical complication is the precise accounting of energy and momentum selectivity of scattering events, which become exceptionally restrictive in 1D and lead to critical deviation from typical Fermi liquid behaviors. Commonly used approximations17−20 either irreparably break the predictive power over the thermalization dynamics, particularly the ability to describe metastable states and many-time scales dynamics, or only allow for lower order processes (see the Supporting Information for a complete description of numerical challenges).

Here, we newly developed a numerical approach to the Boltzmann transport and scattering equation to simulate the microscopic processes leading to THz radiation and photocurrent generation in the aligned (6,5) CNT device. We explicitly treated four electron bands21(e1...4), three phonon22/defect bands (ac, acoustic phonon; op, optical phonon; Imp, impurity/defect), three exciton bands (one dark E11, one bright E11, and one bright E22 exciton),12,23 and a photon band (hν). Realistic dispersions were used for electrons, excitons, and photons, while effective phonon/defect bands were adopted to represent the large number of lattice modes and lattice imperfections (see Figure 3a and the Supporting Information for details). Quasiparticle populations are described as time (t)-, band (n)-, and momentum (k)-dependent occupancies fn(k, t). In thermal equilibrium, the populations are time-independent and given, in the case of Fermions, by fn(k) = fFD(εn(k)), where fFD(ε) is the Fermi–Dirac distribution and εn(k) are the band dispersions. However, after the laser excitation, the quasiparticle populations can be extremely different from their equilibrium values, and the thermalization very often happens across a number of time scales, depending on the involved scattering channels.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Dispersions of the bands of all the included quasiparticles. (b) Qualitative description of the most influential scattering processes at different time scales. (c) Schematic representation of all the types of the 52 scatterings included in the modeling. For more information, see the Supporting Information. (d) Time snapshots of the populations displayed over the dispersion: the thickness of the color bar as well as its colorscale represent the k-resolved population. The time propagation of the population in the remaining bands is calculated but not shown here. (e) Band-resolved density plot of the quasiparticle population fn(k, t) for two of the electronic bands and all of the excitonic bands.

We took into account 52 scattering channels (as well as their time reversal), including both three-leg scatterings (i.e., two particles in and one out) and four-leg scatterings (i.e., two particles in and two out or three in and one out), as shown in Figure 3c. All scatterings were calculated using the full, strongly out-of-equilibrium Boltzmann scattering integral (see the Supporting Information). To our knowledge, this problem has so far been considered impossible to solve except in oversimplified systems or under strong approximations. Extensive methodological developments were necessary to overcome these limits (see the Supporting Information). Within the Boltzmann equation, we also took account of the fact that quasiparticles are subject to an external electric field due to the bias, which induces an acceleration proportional to the quasiparticle charge. Due to the lack of spatial resolution at this stage of implementation of the numerical solver, the physical extraction of accelerated quasiparticles from the CNTs into the metallic leads was included via an effective population decay term (see the Supporting Information).

The schematic diagram in Figure 3b describes the processes occurring at different time scales, and parts d and e of Figure 3 show the populations of each band at selected time steps A–E. The laser excitation generates optically active E22 excitons (Figure 3d, A). They partially decay through scatterings with phonons24,25 into bright and dark E11 excitons with similar energy but larger momentum (Figure 3d, B). These quasiparticles are unaffected by the electric field and eventually decay to the bottom of the excitonic bands through scatterings with phonons (Figure 3d, C). A fraction of the excitons autoionize into electron–hole pairs in the conduction (valence) bands (Figure 3d, B) through spontaneous dissociation.26 The free carriers are then accelerated by the electric field and shift in k (Figure 3d, C), inducing a rapid rise in current, which, in turn, generates THz radiation (Figure 4a). The acceleration in momentum is limited by electron–phonon scatterings27,28 (Figure 3d, C), which prevent the electronic population from being accelerated indefinitely, simply leading to an asymmetry between positive and negative k in the electronic population. Eventually, the free carriers are physically extracted from the CNTs, thermalizng in the metal contacts, leading to a drop in the electron and hole population and therefore a drop in the charge current (Figure 4a and Supporting Information, section 2.4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Theoretical THz emission in (a) time and (b) frequency domain, compared to experimental measurements for three biases. (c) Number of excitons left in the system at the last simulated time. (d) Comparison of the computed peak amplitude of the THz emission and photocurrent with experimental results.

The simulated THz radiation (Figures 4a) and its spectrum (Figures 4b) are overall in good agreement with the experimental data. The time domain experimental THz signal shows a sharp negative peak directly after the main positive one originating from the switching off of the current. Our theoretical choice of the extraction mechanism leads to a broader and therefore smaller negative peak. At this stage, we cannot make a claim on the details of the extraction mechanism, since this discrepancy as well as the presence of further side peaks in the experimental THz radiation can be ascribed to suppression of low- and high-frequency components due to a variety of factors which were not incorporated in the simulations: inherent response of detector,29−31 alignment and the effects of optical components along the THz propagation path from sample to detector.32−35 All of these could easily distort the actual temporal and frequency profile of THz radiation from the sample. However, to verify the validity of our microscopic picture, we compare the effect of laser fluence (limited to the low fluence regime, see more in the Supporting Information) and bias in the simulated dynamics to the measured ones. The population of the electronic conduction bands within 2 ps after excitation is proportional to the number of absorbed photons, which explains why the THz emission amplitude shows a linear dependence on the pump power. An increase in the bias increases the induced asymmetry of the electronic distribution of both the conduction and valence bands. Since the number of autoionized free carriers is simply proportional to the laser power and not to the electric field, the induced current becomes proportional to the bias. Notice that we can exclude with certainty that the exciton breakup happens through field ionization, as the THz amplitude would, in that case, be superlinear with the bias.36

What remains still puzzling is the superlinear behavior of the photocurrent with the applied voltage. One is usually tempted to assume the photocurrent and the THz emission to be simply different measurements of the same current, as our LT-GaAs control experiment seems to suggest (see inset in Figure 2c). However, there is a subtle difference between the two measurements: while the photocurrent is able to time integrate all of the current generated in the PCA, only high-frequency components are emitted and measured as THz radiation. Therefore, the two techniques provide insight into different time scales. By oversimplifying, one could say that the difference between the photocurrent and THz radiation is the amplitude of low-frequency currents.

The low-energy excitons that are left in the system after the dynamics explained above (Figure 3d, E) are not subject to the applied bias due to their zero net charge and therefore not accelerated and not subject to an important extraction from the CNTs. They survive at the bottom of the band and require longer times to annihilate through radiative or nonradiative processes (not included in the model). During this time, their high-energy tails will, due to the high temperature, slowly autoionize into free carriers (Figure 3b). These will generate a slow (i.e., low-frequency) electric current, which will not contribute to the THz emission, but will be measured at the electrodes as photocurrent. Such current will be proportional to the product of the number of excitons present in the system at the end of the initial thermalization (time E in Figure 3) and the bias.

At a first sight, such current is expected to be simply linear in the bias. However, a careful analysis of all possible scatterings shows that an important four-leg scattering channel becomes active for electrons with an energy above a certain threshold: exciton impact generation (Figure 4c). An electron can scatter with an impurity (which provides momentum), lose energy, and generate an exciton in the process. Due to energy conservation, this scattering is allowed only for electrons with an energy larger than 1.2 eV above the band bottom. At low electric fields, only a small number of electrons can occupy such high energies. However, as the bias increases, this number grows. These electrons have therefore the chance of creating further excitons compared to the ones generated by the original optical excitation. As a consequence, the number of generated low-energy excitons has one component that is independent of the electric field and another that instead grows with it (see Figure 4c). On a longer time scale (not included in our simulations), a fraction of these eventually autoionize into free carriers, which will again be accelerated by the electric field. Therefore, the photocurrent will be the sum of the picosecond current pulse and a low-frequency current generated by these autoionizing excitons. The low-frequency component of the photocurrent will be proportional to the product of the bias and the number of residual excitons at the end of the thermalization process (which depends partially on the bias itself). This explains the observed superlinear dependence of the amplitude of the photocurrent on the bias (see Figure 4d).

Notice that, since both the impulsive current responsible for the THz emission and the photocurrent are due to free carriers, measuring the same responses after excitation of E11 excitons can provide a deep insight into the efficiency, the time scales, as well as the mechanisms involved with the dissociation of these low-energy excitons, compared to the dissociation channels of E22 excitons.37,38

Concluding, against expectations because of the large exciton binding energy, we produced, without any optimization, a prototype CNT-based THz emitter with an efficiency only an order of magnitude lower than highly optimized commercially available LT-GaAs-based emitters. With a suitable device design, it is possible to utilize the superior properties of CNT such as high thermal and chemical stability, to develop stable ultrabright sources. The strong confinement of current in a one-dimensional system could also offer better polarization control. In addition, their mechanical properties make them attractive for compact THz systems and wearable optoelectronics.

We further performed an unprecedentedly accurate theoretical analysis of the thermalization dynamics in these CNTs and explained the microscopic mechanisms behind the dissociation of excitons, free carrier dynamics in an applied electric field, and conversion mechanisms between different quasiparticles. We identified the critical role of exciton impact generation in the ultrafast dynamics of CNTs causing a superlinear dependence of the photocurrent on the bias voltage. Last but not least, our work shows that large-area films of aligned CNTs provide an exciting and promising playground for the study and use of the coexistence of positively and negatively charged as well as uncharged quasiparticles, as well as for the development of THz excitonics.

Acknowledgments

J.K. acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences through Grant Number DEFG02-06ER46308 (optical spectroscopy), the U.S. National Science Foundation through Grant No. ECCS-1708315 (device fabrication), and the Robert A. Welch Foundation through Grant No. C-1509 (sample preparation). M.B. acknowledges Nanyang Technological University, NAP-SUG, for the funding of this research. M.W. acknowledges the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) for funding through Doctoral School W1243 Solids4Fun (Building Solids for Function), and Nanyang Technological University, NAP-SUG. K.H. acknowledges the FWF for support through project P30997. This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP18KK0140, JP18K18861, and JP19K15047 and by JSPS Core-to-Core Program and Program for Promoting International Joint Research, Osaka University. I.K. acknowledges support from the Iketani Science and Technology Foundation.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05082.

  • On the experimental side, information on device fabrication and experimental setup, calculations for CNT degree of alignment and THz emission efficiency, and additional data at different pump energies; on the theoretical side, a summary of the used band dispersion, a short introduction on the quantum Boltzmann equation, an analysis of each scattering channel used as well as the used scattering amplitudes, the description of carrier extraction, and a brief overview of the numerical method (PDF)

Author Contributions

@ F.R.G.B., M.W.: These authors contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

nl9b05082_si_001.pdf (19.7MB, pdf)

References

  1. Weisman R. B., Kono J., Eds. Optical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes: A Vol. Dedicated to the Memory of Professor Mildred Dresselhaus; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zheng M. Sorting Carbon Nanotubes. Top. Curr. Chem. 2017, 375, 13. 10.1007/s41061-016-0098-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. He X.; Gao W.; Xie L.; Li B.; Zhang Q.; Lei S.; Robinson J. M.; Hároz E. H.; Doorn S. K.; Wang W.; Vajtai R.; Ajayan P. M.; Adams W. W.; Hauge R. H.; Kono J. Wafer-Scale Monodomain Films of Spontaneously Aligned Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 633–638. 10.1038/nnano.2016.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gao W.; Kono J. Science and Applications of Wafer-Scale Crystalline Carbon Nanotube Films Prepared through Controlled Vacuum Filtration. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 181605. 10.1098/rsos.181605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartmann R. R.; Kono J.; Portnoi M. E. Terahertz Science and Technology of Carbon Nanomaterials. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 322001. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/32/322001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Titova L. V.; Pint C. L.; Zhang Q.; Hauge R. H.; Kono J.; Hegmann F. A. Generation of Terahertz Radiation by Optical Excitation of Aligned Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3267. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chernikov A.; Berkelbach T. C.; Hill H. M.; Rigosi A.; Li Y.; Aslan O. B.; Reichman D. R.; Hybertsen M. S.; Heinz T. F. Exciton Binding Energy and Nonhydrogenic Rydberg Series in Monolayer WS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 076802 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.076802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ugeda M. M.; Bradley A. J.; Shi S.-F.; da Jornada F. H.; Zhang Y.; Qiu D. Y.; Ruan W.; Mo S.-K.; Hussain Z.; Shen Z.-X.; Wang F.; Louie S. G.; Crommie M. F. Giant Bandgap Renormalization and Excitonic Effects in a Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1091. 10.1038/nmat4061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. He K.; Kumar N.; Zhao L.; Wang Z.; Mak K. F.; Zhao H.; Shan J. Tightly Bound Excitons in Monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 026803 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.026803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ishihara T.; Takahashi J.; Goto T. Exciton State in Two-Dimensional Perovskite Semiconductor (C10H21NH3)2PbI4. Solid State Commun. 1989, 69, 933–936. 10.1016/0038-1098(89)90935-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blancon J.-C.; Stier A. V.; Tsai H.; Nie W.; Stoumpos C. C.; Traore B.; Pedesseau L.; Kepenekian M.; Katsutani F.; Noe G. T.; Kono J.; Tretiak S.; Crooker S. A.; Katan C.; Kanatzidis M. G.; Crochet J. J.; Even J.; Mohite A. D. Scaling Law for Excitons in 2D Perovskite Quantum Wells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2254. 10.1038/s41467-018-04659-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maultzsch J.; Pomraenke R.; Reich S.; Chang E.; Prezzi D.; Ruini A.; Molinari E.; Strano M. S.; Thomsen C.; Lienau C. Exciton Binding Energies in Carbon Nanotubes from Two-Photon Photoluminescence. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 72, 241402. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.241402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang F.; Dukovic G.; Brus L. E.; Heinz T. F. The Optical Resonances in Carbon Nanotubes Arise from Excitons. Science 2005, 308, 838. 10.1126/science.1110265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dukovic G.; Wang F.; Song D.; Sfeir M. Y.; Heinz T. F.; Brus L. E. Structural Dependence of Excitonic Optical Transitions and Band-Gap Energies in Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2314–2318. 10.1021/nl0518122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao W.; Doiron C. F.; Li X.; Kono J.; Naik G. V. Macroscopically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes as a Refractory Platform for Hyperbolic Thermal Emitters. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1602–1609. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishihara T.; Takakura A.; Miyauchi Y.; Itami K. Ultra-narrow-band near-infrared thermal exciton radiation in intrinsic one-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3144. 10.1038/s41467-018-05598-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malic E.; Knorr A.. Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes: Ultrafast Relaxation Dynamics and Optics; WILEY-VCH: Cambridge, U.K., 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hirtschulz M.; Milde F.; Mailic E.; Thomsen C.; Reich S. Theory of ultrafast intraband relaxation in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Status Solidi B 2008, 245, 2164. 10.1002/pssb.200879583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hirtschulz M.; Malic E.; Milde F.; Knorr A. Excitation-induced dephasing and ultrafast intrasubband relaxation in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2009, 80, 085405 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.085405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Köhler C.; Watermann T.; Malic E. Time- and momentum-resolved phonon-induced relaxation dynamics in carbon nanotubes. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2013, 25, 105301. 10.1088/0953-8984/25/10/105301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Charlier J.-C.; Blase X.; Roche S. Electronic and transport properties of nanotubes. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2007, 79, 677–732. 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.677. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lim Y.-S.; Nugraha A. R. T.; Cho S.-J.; Noh M.-Y.; Yoon E.-J.; Liu H.; Kim J.-H.; Telg H.; Haroz E. H.; Sanders G. D.; Baik S.-H.; Kataura H.; Doorn S. K.; Stanton C. J.; Saito R.; Kono J.; Joo T.; et al. Ultrafast Generation of Fundamental and Multiple-Order Phonon Excitations in Highly Enriched (6,5) Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1426–1432. 10.1021/nl404536b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dresselhaus M. S.; Dresselhaus G.; Saito R.; Jorio A. Exciton Photophysics of Carbon Nanotubes. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58, 719–747. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reich S.; Dworzak M.; Hoffmann A.; Thomsen C.; Strano M. S. Excited-State Carrier Lifetime in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 033402 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.033402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lauret J. S.; Voisin C.; Cassabois G.; Delalande C.; Roussignol P.; Jost O.; Capes L. Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics in Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 057404 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.057404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Park J.; Reid O. G.; Blackburn J. L.; Rumbles G. Photoinduced spontaneous free-carrier generation in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8809. 10.1038/ncomms9809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Manzoni C.; Gambetta A.; Menna E.; Meneghetti M.; Lanzani G.; Cerullo G. Intersubband Exciton Relaxation Dynamics in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 207401. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.207401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Park J.-Y.; Rosenblatt S.; Yaish Y.; Sazonova V.; Üstünel H.; Graig S.; Arias T. A.; Brouwer P. W.; McEuen P. L. Electron-Phonon Scattering in Metallic Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 517–520. 10.1021/nl035258c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tani M.; Sakai K.; Mimura H. Ultrafast Photoconductive Detectors Based on Semi-Insulating GaAs and InP. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 36, L1175–L1178. 10.1143/JJAP.36.L1175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Park S.-G.; Melloch M.R.; Weiner A.M. Analysis of terahertz waveforms measured by photoconductive and electrooptic sampling. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1999, 35, 810–819. 10.1109/3.760330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Duvillaret L.; Garet F.; Roux J.; Coutaz J. Analytical modeling and optimization of terahertz time-domain spectroscopy experiments, using photoswitches as antennas. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2001, 7, 615–623. 10.1109/2944.974233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kužel P.; Khazan M. A.; Kroupa J. Spatiotemporal transformations of ultrashort terahertz pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 1795–1800. 10.1364/JOSAB.16.001795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jepsen P. U.; Jacobsen R. H.; Keiding S. R. Generation and detection of terahertz pulses from biased semiconductor antennas. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 2424–2436. 10.1364/JOSAB.13.002424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hattori T.; Rungsawang R.; Ohta K.; Tukamoto K. Gaussian Beam Analysis of Temporal Waveform of Focused Terahertz Pulses. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 41, 5198–5204. 10.1143/JJAP.41.5198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Rudd J.; Mittleman D. M. Influence of substrate-lens design in terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2002, 19, 319–329. 10.1364/JOSAB.19.000319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kumamoto Y.; Yoshida M.; Ishii A.; Yokoyama A.; Shimada T.; Kato Y. Spontaneous Exciton Dissociation in Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 117401. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.117401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Beard M. C.; Blackburn J. L.; Heben M. J. Photogenerated Free Carrier Dynamics in Metal and Semiconductor Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Films. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4238–4242. 10.1021/nl801913y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Soavi G.; Scotognella F.; Viola D.; Hefner T.; Hertel T.; Cerullo G.; Lanzani G. High energetic excitons in carbon nanotubes directly probe charge-carriers. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9681. 10.1038/srep09681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nl9b05082_si_001.pdf (19.7MB, pdf)

Articles from Nano Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES