Abstract
Background
Diarrhea is a frequent complication of solid organ transplantation. Cryptosporidiosis is classically reported in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and emerged as a cause of persistent diarrhea in solid organ transplant patients.
Methods
Through the ANOFEL Cryptosporidium National Network and the French Transplantation Society, we collected all cryptosporidiosis cases identified in solid organ transplanted patients between 2006 and 2010 in France.
Results
We reported 47 solid organ transplant recipients (41 kidneys) with cryptosporidiosis, mostly men (68%), with a median age of 52 (6-70) years old. Five patients had additional immunodepression favoring cryptosporidiosis (CD40 ligand deficiency [n = 1], human immunodeficiency virus infection [n = 4]). Cryptosporidiosis occurred at a median time of 3.4 (0-19.8) years posttransplant. Exposure to environmental risk factors was found before infection onset in 18 patients. Time between first symptoms and diagnosis was 10 (2-110) days. Four patients had associated extraintestinal location (biliary tract [n = 3] and lung [n = 1]). Thirty-five patients received specific therapy against cryptosporidiosis ie nitozoxanide, 25 in monotherapy, and 10 in association with azithromycin, 13 in association with immunosuppression (IS) reduction. Four patients were cured with IS treatment tapering only. The others patients had neither IS reduction nor specific therapy against cryptosporidiosis. Cryptosporidiosis was complicated by renal failure in 15 patients. Symptoms resolved after a median of 10 days of treatment. Six patients relapsed and 3 died, 1 with evolutive infection.
Conclusions
Cryptosporidiosis is a late posttransplant infection that disseminated to biliar duct or lung in 9% of patients. When limited to digestive tract, infection may resolve without IS reduction.
Cryptosporidium spp. is a protozoan-causing diarrhea after the ingestion of contaminated food products or water.1,2 Disease severity and duration vary with host immune status.3,4 Whereas infection is self-limited in immunocompetent hosts, it can be responsible for severe and/or disseminated disease in the immunocompromised. Cryptosporidiosis has been reported in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and more recently emerged as a cause of severe and persistent diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients.5–8 One fifth of SOT will develop diarrhea in 3 years posttransplant.9,10 The most frequently reported pathogens responsible for persistent diarrhea are by far Clostridium difficile and Norovirus.10,11 However, cryptosporidiosis can be responsible diarrhea in this setting.7,10,12–14 Most reports are confined to single patients or small series. One study was conducted in an endemic area in India evidencing Cryptosporidium spp. being responsible for 28% of diarrhea in transplant patients (34 patients).6 Clinical presentation, outcome, and treatment of cryptosporidiosis in SOT patients are yet poorly described.
At the request of the Institut National de Veille Sanitaire, the French center for disease control, a Cryptosporidium National Network has been set up in 2006 in France to provide data on the epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis. A third of reported cases of cryptosporidiosis in France occurred in immunocompromised patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.15 We retrospectively collected information on history, treatment, and outcome of cryptosporidiosis in SOT recipients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The ANOFEL Cryptosporidium National Network (ACNN) was set up to provide public health authorities with data on the incidence and epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis in France. The operating of the network has been described.16 Through the ACNN and by contact with French Transplantation Society, we retrospectively collected all cryptosporidiosis cases identified in SOT recipients between 2006 and 2010. Cases were defined by the presence of diarrhea (ie, ≥ 3 liquid stools per day) and detection of oocysts of Cryptosporidium sp. by a microscopic examination of fecal smears after staining (modified acid-fast Ziehl-Neelsen or auramine). Lung cryptosporidiosis was assessed by presence of cryptosporodies at the site of infection. Biliary cryptosporidiosis was assessed by compatible images on magnetic resonance imaging or cholangiography associated with confirmed digestive location. We retrospectively collected clinical information regarding the patient, the transplant, induction and maintenance immunosuppressive regimens, clinical presentation, environmental characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Ethical board approval was centralized and obtained for the multicenter study.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are described as means (± standard deviation) and/or medians (range) and categorical variables are presented as numbers and frequencies (percentages).
RESULTS
Characteristics of the Patients
Forty-seven SOT recipients developed cryptosporidiosis between 2006 and 2010 in France. Patients were from 17 centers. The patients’ characteristics are reported in Table 1. Most patients were men (68%), with a median age of 52 (6-70) years. Seven patients were younger than 15 years, all were from the same center.15 The kidney was the most frequently transplanted organ (n = 42, 47%). A single patient received kidney and liver transplant. Five patients had additional immunodepression favoring cryptosporidiosis: 1 patient had CD40 ligand deficiency and was a liver transplant recipient and 4 had HIV infection (3 had received kidney transplant and 1 heart transplant).
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of the 47 transplanted patients with cryptosporidiosis in France from 2006 to 2010
Clinical Characteristics
Cryptosporidiosis occurred at a median time of 3.4 (0-19.8) years posttransplant (1.4 [0.4-4.3] years posttransplant for the 4 HIV infected patients). It occurred within 6 months posttransplant in 10 patients. Time between first symptoms and diagnosis was 10 (2-110) days (Table 2). Two patients had coinfection, one with enterovirus and one with Giardia intestinalis. Two patients had mucus or blood in stool without any coinfection.
TABLE 2.
Clinical presentation of cryptosporidiosis and laboratory characteristics in the 47 solid organ transplant patients
Four patients had associated extraintestinal location (biliary tract [n = 3] and lung [n = 1]); 3 were kidney and 1 liver transplant recipient. In these patients, median time from transplant to cryptosporidiosis was 0.5 (0.2-4) years. Furthermore, 2 patients with biliary cryptosporidiosis experienced acute rejection treated with corticosteroids before cryptosporidiosis: 1 patient with Cryptosporidium cholangitis had CD40 ligand deficiency; he never cleared the infection and died, and the second patient relapsed.
Four patients had HIV infection; all with CD4 cell counts greater than 300/mm3 at time of cryptosporidiosis diagnosis. Median age was 45.6 (27.3-49.6) years. None of them had extraintestinal location. Diagnostic delay was 9 days.6–20 Diarrhea duration was 12 (10-40) days. All 4 patients were treated with nitozoxanide for a median time of 30 days (21-90 days) and one relapsed.
Treatment and Outcome
Thirty-five patients received specific therapy against cryptosporidiosis, that is, nitozoxanide, 25 in monotherapy for a mean duration of 19 days (2-35 days) and 10 in association with azithromycin for a median duration of 10 days (8-60 days), 13 in association with immunosuppression (IS) tapered or stopped (mean treatment duration of 19 days (4-60 days). Treatment and outcome are summarized in Figure 1. Finally, 4 patients had IS treatment tapering only. Three patients had neither tapering of IS treatment or specific therapy against cryptosporidiosis. Diarrhea resolved 11 (2-25) days after treatment onset when treated with antiparasitic treatment and 9 (1-53) days when antiparasitic treatment was associated with IS reduction. Interestingly, the 7 patients who did not receive antiparasitic treatment or/and reduction of immunosuppressive regimen cleared Cryptosporidium spp. without any relapse. Among all patients, 86% patients had stool negative after a median duration of 14 (1-53) days. Cryptosporidiosis was complicated with renal failure in 15 patients. One 10-year-old kidney transplant had organ rejection secondary to cryptosporidiosis.
FIGURE 1.
Flowchart of cryptosporidiosis treatment and outcome.
Six patients relapsed, all were renal transplant, 1 had lung location. Two had a history of recent acute rejection. All were treated with an association of nitazoxanide and azithromycin, 4 in association with reduction of immunosuppressive regimen. Three patients died, 1 from biliary and profuse digestive cryptosporidiosis associated with CD40 ligand deficiency although careful investigations were performed at the onset of transplant procedure. Oocysts of Crytposporidium sp. were present in stool. However, no autopsy was performed.
Epidemiological Risk
Exposure to environmental risk factors was found before infection onset in 18 patients. We found epidemiological information that could be associated with the occurrence of cryptosporidiosis in 6 patients from rural areas, 2 that were in contact with farm animals, 2 drank nonpotable water, 4 used recreational water, and 10 traveled recently in endemic areas. Diarrhea was reported in siblings for 4 patients.
DISCUSSION
We report 47 cases of cryptosporidiosis in solid organ transplanted patients between 2006 and 2010 in France. In our cohort, cryptosporidiosis is a late posttransplant infection, occurring a median time of 3 years after transplant. Whereas in HIV infection low CD4 cell count, below 50 is the determinant of symptomatic cryptosporidiosis,17 SOT patients developing cryptosporidiosis in our study had a median CD4 cell count over 400 cells/mm3. All patients had diarrhea, most of them associated with abdominal pain. Fever and blood or mucus in stool could also be present in the absence of any evidenced coinfection. Cryptosporidiosis has therefore to be discussed in case of any form of diarrhea in SOT. Diarrhea duration reported for cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent children is 7 days.1 In our SOT patients, digestive cryptosporidiosis is also quite acute with a median duration of symptoms of 10 days compared with 8.7 months for Norovirus and 1 month for bacterial infection as reported previously by our group.11
Infection severity is reflected by hospitalization rate and duration. Impact on renal function was important as half of patients developed renal insufficiency. However, only 1 organ rejection complicated the infection. We report extra intestinal location in 9% of patients, 7% developing biliary location. Among the 3 patients with biliary cryptosporidiosis, 1 had CD 40 ligand deficiency and liver transplantation, whereas the other 2 were kidney transplant. In immunocompetent patients, cryptosporidiosis is associated with diarrhea without extra intestinal location, whereas sclerosing cholangitis is frequent in patients with AIDS (17% or CD40 ligand deficiency (10%).18 Sclerosing cholangitis was previously reported in 6.1% of pediatric SOT developing cryptosporidiosis.19
Cryptosporidiosis treatment is not always mandatory in immunocompetent individuals, despite association with relapse of digestive symptoms.20 For immunocompromised individuals, cellular immunity improvement is the key of cryptosporidiosis management. Indeed, in HIV-infected patients, it was evidenced that highly active antiretroviral therapy treatment, as single therapy, was associated with favorable evolution of cryptosporidiosis.21 In our report, half of the patients had a reduction of IS regimen. However, we cannot assess that this reduction was necessary to cure the infection. Despite IS reduction and antiparasitic treatment, 4 patients relapsed.
Antiparasitic regimen for cryptosporidiosis treatment in SOT is not well defined. Nitazoxanide was previously evidenced to reduce diarrhea duration in non-HIV infected individual, but not in HIV-infected individuals.22–24 Azithromycin was not effective in cryptosporidiosis treatment in AIDS patients.25 In an Indian study of Cryptosporidium infection in SOT recipients, prolonged course from 16 to 60 days of nitazoxanide alone in combination with fluoroquinolone in 21 patients were used. 16% patients had relapse. Combination therapy was more effective than nitazoxanide treatment alone.6 Our data suggested that antiparasitic treatment is not required to cure all SOT patients with cryptosporidiosis, because 7 patients were cured without antiparasitic treatment. Only 1 patient had refractory infection despite IS reduction and antiparasitic combination, due to additional underlying immunodeficiency with CD40 ligand deficiency. We can assume that depending on infection severity, renal impairment and symptoms duration, antiparasitic treatment could be postponed. Relapse was quite frequent with 6 patients that relapsed. However, in immunocompetent patients, up to 40% of patients had recurrence of intestinal symptoms.20 Majority of patients were on tacrolimus that was reported to be protective in Bhaduaria study.6 However, we did not study risk factor of cryptosporidiosis.
We could find environmental exposure at risk to develop cryptosporidiosis in some patients as contact with farm animals, recreational waters or travel in endemic countries. Recommendations could be given to SOT patients to avoid contact with recreational water and drink mineral water while traveling in tropical areas to reduce cryptosporidiosis risk.
In conclusion, cryptosporidiosis is a late and severe posttransplant infection. Clinical presentation associates digestive symptoms and can be complicated with biliary duct or lung location. Symptoms resolve after a median of ten days of treatment. When limited to digestive tract, infection might resolve without specific antiparasitic treatment. Exposures to environmental risk factors are quite frequently found before infection onset and should be explained to patients.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank the following principal investigators of the ANOFEL Cryptosporidium National Network and Transplant Cryptosporidium Study Group (France), who contributed to the current database. Those outside Paris (in alphabetical order by city) are as follows:
Amiens (A. Totet), Angers (L. de Gentile), Besancon (L. Millon), Bordeaux (B. Couprie, I. Accoceberry), Brest (G. Nevez, D. Jamet), Caen (C. Duhamel, J. Bonhome, B. Hurault de Ligny), Clermont (M. Cambon, P. Poirier, E. Geoffroy), Cayenne (B. Carme), Dijon (A. Bonnin, F. Dalle, Y. Tanter, C. Lollivier, Sautour M), Fort de France (N. Desbois), Grenoble (C. Pinel), Le Havre (ML Grillot), Lille (E. Dei Cas, K Guyot, E. Dutoit), Limoges (ML. Darde), Lyon (F. De Monbrison, M. Rabodonirina, F. Nobili, A. Roussoulieres), Marseille (C. Mary), Montellier (D. Basset), Nancy (A. Debourgogne), Nantes (F. Morio, M. Miegeville, D. Cantarovich, M.Gosselin), Nice (P. Marty), Pointe à Pitre (M. Nicolas), Poitiers (MH. Rodier), Rouen (I. Etienne), Saint Etienne (P. Flori), Strasbourg (O. Villard, R. Kessler), Toulouse (M.D. Linas, A. Berry), Tours (T.H. Duong), Those in Paris are as follows: Paris 5 Pharma (N. Kapel), Bichat (S. Houze, A. Faussard, D. Haoucine, L. Champion), Cochin (H. year, J. Dupouy-Camet), Pitié Salpétrière (A. Datry, M. Thellier, P. Buffet, F. Touafek), Saint Antoine (D. Magne, G. Belkadi), Saint Louis (E. Pillabourt, F. Derouin, C. Sarfati, J. Menotti), Kremlin Bicetre (A. Angoulvant, A. Durbach), HEGP (E. Dannaoui), Henri Mondor (F. Botterel, P. Remy, M. Matignon), Trousseau (C. Azema).
Footnotes
Supported by the French Transplantation Society.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
F.L., K.A., O.L., and M.E.B. contributed equally to this work.
F.L. designed the study, analyzed the results, wrote the article, K.A. collected the data, analyzed the results, and wrote the article. L.F. revised the article. M.-F.M.-B. designed the study. H.A. performed the statistical analysis. J.T. participated in data collection and revised the articcle. S.D. participated in data collection and revised the article. J.Z. revised the article. A.S. revised the article. C.L. revised the article. O.L. designed the study and wrote the article. M.-E.B. designed the study and wrote the article.
Correspondence: Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux, Unité de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Service de Microbiologie, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France. (marie-elisabeth.bougnoux@aphp.fr).
This French multicenter study is the largest study of Cryptosporidium infection in transplant patients outside of endemic areas like India, and shows that it can be eradicated without immunosuppressive reduction in many patients.
REFERENCES
- 1.Checkley W, White AD, Jaqanath D. A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium Lancet Infect Dis 2015. 1585–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bouzid M, Hunter PR, Chalmers RM. Cryptosporidium pathogenicity and virulence Clin Microbiol Rev 2013. 26115–134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Petry F, Jakobi V, Tessema TS. Host immune response to Cryptosporidium parvum infection Exp Parasitol 2010. 126304–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Flanigan T, Whalen C, Turner J. Cryptosporidium infection and CD4 counts Ann Intern Med 1992. 116840–842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hunter R, Nichols G. Epidemiology and clinical features of Cryptosporidium infection in immunocompromised patients Clin Microbiol Rev 2002. 15145–154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhadauria D, Goel A, Kaul A. Cryptosporidium infection after renal transplantation in an endemic area Transpl Infect Dis 2015. 1748–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bonatti H, Barroso LF, Sawyer RG. Cryptosporidium enteritis in solid organ transplant recipients: multicenter retrospective evaluation of 10 cases reveals an association with elevated tacrolimus concentrations Transpl Infect Dis 2012. 14635–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wanyiri JW, Kanyi H, Maina S. Cryptosporidiosis in HIV/AIDS patients in Kenya: clinical features, epidemiology, molecular characterization and antibody responses Am J Trop Med Hyg 2014. 91319–328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bunnapradist S, Neri L, Wong W. Incidence and risk factors for diarrhea following kidney transplantation and association with graft loss and mortality Am J Kidney Dis 2008. 51478–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Echenique IA, Penugonda S, Stosor V. Diagnostic yields in solid organ transplant recipients admitted with diarrhea Clin Infect Dis 2015. 60729–737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roos-Weil D, Ambert-Balay K, Lanternier F. Impact of norovirus/sapovirus-related diarrhea in renal transplant recipients hospitalized for diarrhea Transplantation 2011. 9261–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aulagnon F, Scemla A, DeWolf S. Diarrhea after kidney transplantation: a new look at a frequent symptom Transplantation 2014. 98806–816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Krause I, Amir J, Cleper R. Cryptosporidiosis in children following solid organ transplantation Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012. 311135–1138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Acikgoz Y, Ozkaya O, Bek K. Cryptosporidiosis: a rare and severe infection in a pediatric renal transplant recipient Pediatr Transplant 2012. 16E115–E119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bandin F, Kwon T, Linas MD. Cryptosporidiosis in paediatric renal transplantation Pediatr Nephrol 2009. 242245–2255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Laboratory-based surveillance for Cryptosporidium in France, 2006-2009. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:19642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Colford JM, Tager IB, Hirozawa AM. Cryptosporidiosis among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Factors related to symptomatic infection and survival Am J Epidemiol 1996. 144807–816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Forbes A, Blanshard C, Gazzard B. Natural history of AIDS related sclerosing cholangitis: a study of 20 cases Gut 1993. 34116–121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Campos M, Jouzdani E, Sempoux C. Sclerosing cholangitis associated to cryptosporidiosis in liver-transplanted children Eur J Pediatr 2000. 159113–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hunter PR, Hughes S, Woodhouse S. Health sequelae of human cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent patients Clin Infect Dis 2004. 39504–510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Miao YM, Awad-El-Kariem FM, Franzen C. Eradication of cryptosporidia and microsporidia following successful antiretroviral therapy J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000. 25124–129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rossignol JF, Ayoub A, Ayers MS. Treatment of diarrhea caused by Cryptosporidium parvum: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Nitazoxanide J Infect Dis 2001. 184103–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Amadi B, Mwiya M, Musuku J. Effect of nitazoxanide on morbidity and mortality in Zambian children with cryptosporidiosis: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 2002. 3601375–1380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rossignol JF, Hidalgo H, Feregrino M. A double-‘blind’ placebo-controlled study of nitazoxanide in the treatment of cryptosporidial diarrhoea in AIDS patients in Mexico Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998. 92663–666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cabada MM, White AC. Treatment of cryptosporidiosis: do we know what we think we know? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2010. 23494–499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]