Impact of Non-Cardiac Clinicopathologic Characteristics on Survival in Transthyretin Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Abstract

Introduction

Hereditary (variant) transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) with polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN) is a rare genetic disorder that causes progressive autonomic and sensorimotor neuropathy, severe disability, and death within 10 years of onset. Previous studies have primarily focused on how baseline cardiac characteristics affect mortality, but the impact of non-cardiac baseline characteristics is less defined.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed/Medline (1990–2019) to identify studies that assessed the impact of baseline ATTR-PN characteristics on survival. Outcomes were first summarized descriptively. Extracted survival data were then disaggregated, and parametric mixture models were used to assess survival differences among patient groups defined by factors known to affect survival.

Results

The search yielded 1193 records, of which 35 were retained for analysis. Median survival ranged from 0.5 to > 25 years. The largest survival differences were between cohorts who underwent liver transplantation (LTx) versus those who did not. Among LTx cohorts, pre-LTx ATTR-PN disease duration ≥ 7 years, poor nutritional status, and late disease onset reduced median survival by 13, 12, and 10 years, respectively. Other prognostic survival factors included non-Val30Met genotype and baseline presence of urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, or muscle weakness.

Conclusion

Survival in patients with ATTR-PN is highly variable and affected by non-cardiac baseline characteristics, such as autonomic dysfunction, large fiber involvement, late-onset disease, and non-Val30Met mutation. Careful interpretation of these findings is warranted given that this synthesis did not control for differences between studies. Survival in patients with ATTR-PN remains poor among those who are untreated or with delayed diagnosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00183-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Key Summary Points

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) with polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN) is a rare genetic disorder.

Survival in patients with ATTR-PN is largely characterized by and dependent on associated cardiac damage, but the impact of non-cardiac characteristics on survival are less defined.

This study sought to assess the impact of non-cardiac baseline characteristics on survival in ATTR-PN.

Survival in patients with ATTR-PN was highly variable and affected by non-Val30Met mutation and non-cardiac baseline characteristics, such as autonomic dysfunction, large fiber involvement, and late-onset disease.

Introduction

Hereditary (variant) transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is a rare autosomal dominant disease whereby mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene destabilize the protein’s native homeotetrameric structure and cause it to disassociate into amyloidogenic TTR monomers. As a result, insoluble amyloid fibrils accumulate in the peripheral and autonomic nerves, heart, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, eyes, and connective tissues [1, 2]. Three phenotypes predominate in ATTRv amyloidosis: one is almost exclusively characterized by restrictive cardiomyopathy, another predominantly by polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN), and the third is a mixed phenotype [3–5].

ATTR-PN prevalence has been estimated at approximately 10,000 to 40,000 persons globally, with endemic foci in Portugal, Sweden, and Japan [6, 7]. Notably, disease phenotypes and penetrance across these endemic areas and elsewhere are often different, even for the same genotype [8]. For example, inaugural symptoms of early-onset disease (< 50 years old) include spontaneous burning or sharp pain, non-painful sensations (paresthesia and restless leg syndrome), and/or autonomic symptoms (sexual dysfunction, impaired bladder function, constipation alternating with diarrhea, early satiety, orthostatic dizziness and syncope) associated with damaged distal small myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers [1]. Conversely, in late-onset disease, the combination of well-preserved unmyelinated nerve fibers and axonal sprouting is associated with impaired superficial and deep sensation, severe neuropathic pain, early distal motor involvement, but relatively mild autonomic symptoms at initial presentation [1, 9, 10]. Absent early intervention with liver transplantation (LTx) or disease-modifying pharmacological treatments, ATTR-PN symptoms generally follow an ascending, proximally-oriented pattern as patients experience progressive debilitating polyneuropathy and inexorable loss of motor and organ functions.

Among persons with the classic disease phenotype, death has been reported to occur within 10–15 years of symptom onset, often from cachexia and malnutrition due to gastrointestinal complications [11, 12]. Prognostic survival factors include cardiac dysautonomia [3] and the presence of a mutation other than the more common Val30Met (also referred to as p.Val50Me) tgenotype [11, 13]; both of which are associated with poorer survival.

Owing partly to its phenotypic heterogeneity but also to its rarity, our understanding of survival in ATTR-PN is limited and largely based on observations of persons with the Val30Met genotype. Furthermore, the progression of associated cardiac symptoms and their effects on survival have been the predominant focus in larger studies [14]. However, as our understanding has evolved to reflect a heterogeneous disease, so too should our understanding of how this heterogeneity affects survival. This systematic review and analysis were conducted to describe the impact of non-cardiac clinicopathologic factors on survival and to assess survival trends among ATTR-PN subgroups.

Methods

The relevant evidence was assessed in a two-step process consisting of a systematic literature review to identify relevant data and a descriptive synthesis of those data. The target disease population was limited to persons with ATTR-PN.

Record identification and selection

Records were identified via a systematic literature review per a pre-specified protocol and conducted according to modified American Academy of Neurology guidelines (AAN) [6, 15]. Structured electronic searches of PubMed/Medline and Scopus were conducted on 15 February 2019 to identify relevant primary studies without regard to language of origin or year of publication (See Electronic Supplementary Material Appendix A). Non-human studies and case reports (studies with < 10 ATTR-PN patients) were excluded. Narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were retained separately so that they could be searched for relevant primary reports not yielded by the electronic search.

The electronic search was supplemented with a hand search of conference materials from the International Symposium on Amyloidosis for the three most recent years held (2014, 2016, and 2018). The rationale for evaluating this supplemental material was twofold. First, the consideration of unpublished scientific materials is indicated by the AAN guidelines as a prerequisite for a comprehensive review [15]. Second, materials presented at conferences may not have had time to be published while otherwise being relevant to the content of the present review. To avoid including duplicated information between published and conference sources, a conference record was included only when the information presented in the record was not also reported in an associated peer-reviewed manuscript authored by one or more of the same authors. If the same study was reported as a conference material and as a peer-reviewed manuscript, only the latter was considered for inclusion in this review.

Records yielded by the search strategy were de-duplicated and assessed for inclusion via three rounds of review (title, abstract, and full-text) based on a pre-specified rubric applied by two reviewers. Inconsistencies were adjudicated by consensus. Records were retained if they satisfied the following inclusion criteria:

• Human studies of adults (aged ≥ 18 years).

• Primary report.

• Reported survival among persons with ATTR-PN.

• Follow-up time for survival assessment was ≥ 5 years.

• Sample size is ≥ 10.

• Survival was assessed from a defined baseline event (symptom onset, diagnosis, or treatment initiation).

• Reported whether patients received disease-modifying pharmacologic treatment or LTx.

• Patients were symptomatic at the baseline event (assumed unless noted otherwise).

Records were also included in the descriptive analysis of clinicopathologic prognostic factors if they also included a multivariate assessment of the impact of clinicopathologic factors on survival.

Where sequential studies reported the same endpoints updated for the same cohort, the study with the longest follow-up time was retained, while those with shorter follow-up times were excluded—except where those with shorter follow-up times included relevant survival endpoints not reported in the more recent reports. Additionally, studies or outcomes for a given cohort were excluded if they included only patients with ATTRv variants associated with the phenotype predominantly characterized by cardiomyopathy (i.e., Val122Ile, Thr60Ala, Ser77Tyr, Ile84Ser, Val30Ala, and His90Asp). There was no a priori determination of which specific diagnostic methods or degree of documentation constituted a valid diagnosis of ATTR-PN. It was only required that the cohort in question was described as one comprised entirely of individuals with ATTR-PN.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

There were two survival outcome categories of interest for this study.

The first category included time-to-event survival outcomes, such as survival probabilities, survival percentages, failure probabilities, and failure percentages as measured from a baseline event (symptom onset, diagnosis, or treatment initiation). Where survival outcomes were reported in figures only, survival data were extracted using digitization software (Digitizeit, version 2.3; Braunschweig, Germany). Survival outcomes were pooled according to clinicopathologic characteristics reported in each study.

The impacts of clinicopathologic characteristics on survival were analyzed further. To mitigate the potentially biasing effects of uneven censoring and varying follow-up times among the extracted survival outcomes, patient-level survival data were reconstructed from reported aggregate-level outcomes using methods previously described [16– 18]. This dis-aggregation produced a register of patient-level survival observations, and those with “disease onset” as the baseline event (i.e., starting point from which survival was measured) were considered suitable for further analysis.

Modeling was used to derive survival curves from the aforementioned patient-level observations. Expecting latent heterogeneity within the dataset, we applied parametric mixture modeling that decomposed the overall survival curve into constituent curves. In other words, mixture models assume that the overall survival of a cohort is a function of two or more subgroups: each with its own survival curve that can be estimated with a standard parametric distribution. Specifically, the overall survival $S\left(t\right)$ for a given cohort was specified as a weighted average ($p$) of the constituent subgroup survival curves (here $S_1$ and $S_2$; e.g., LTx and no-LTx) according to Eq. 1:

$$S\left(t\right)=p.S_1\left(t\right)+\left(1-p\right)\ast S_2\left(t\right).$$ 1

Parameter $p$ denotes the proportion of patients belonging to the latent subgroup 1. All model parameters ($p$, $S_1$, and $S_2$) are estimated using the flexsurv-library package of the R programing language for the calculation of the hazards and survival functions and the “nlm-command” for maximizing the likelihood function. Standard errors around the estimated parameters were calculated by taking the diagonal elements of the inverse Hessian at the maximum likelihood.

We stratified the survival data into three classes: (1) LTx versus no LTx; (2) early onset versus late onset; and (3) V30M (i.e, Val30Met) versus non-V30M genotype. Survival was estimated for each class via the method described above, and the mean survival in the class was calculated as the area under the curve. The mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] difference between classes was equal to the difference between survival means.

The second survival outcome category pertained to clinicopathologic prognostic survival factors. When assessed by univariate or multivariate analysis to determine their individual impacts on survival, these factors were recorded along with the directionality and magnitude of their effects and subsequently analyzed descriptively.

Retained studies were classified using the modified AAN guideline [15] as has been reported previously [6]. Evidence classifications ranged from class I (strongest evidence, low risk of bias) to class IV (weakest evidence, very high risk of bias). Risk of bias was evaluated primarily with respect to two considerations: the method by which the initial ATTR-PN diagnosis was made and the frequency of follow-up.

Compliance with Ethics Statement

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Results

The electronic search of the peer-reviewed literature yielded 979 unique records, and the hand search of conference materials yielded 1014 records. In total, 1993 records were assessed in full, of which 35 were retained (Fig. 1; Table 1). These reported survival outcomes assessed over 265,346 person-years [N = 11,116; median follow-up 10 (range 5–35) years]. Most of the retained studies were of a longitudinal, observational design conducted between 1990 and 2007. Risk of bias was low, and evidentiary quality of the retained studies was moderate overall (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Flowchart summarizing the process of study adjudication

Table 1.

Summary of the 35 studies retained for analysis

First author of study, year of publication [reference number]	N (size of cohort)	Country	Diagnostic method(s)	Baseline periodicitya	Follow-up (years)b	Evidence class, risk of biasc
Adams, 2000 [19]	45	Multiplei	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1993–1999	6	1, Low
Adams, 2018 [20]	225	Multiple	NR	2013–2016	7	1, Low
Algalarrondo, 2015/2016 [3, 21]d	215	France	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1993–2011	10	1, Low
Arruda-Olson, 2013 [22]	37	USA	Tissue biopsy	1980–2010	6	2, Low
Barrosso, 2017 [23]	75	Mixed	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	NR–2014	10	1, Low
Bittencourt, 2002 [24]	24	Brazil	Tissue biopsy + genetic testingo	1993–1999	7	2, Moderate
Carvalho, 2002 [25]	35	Portugal	Genetic testing	1992–2000	5	2, Moderate
Coelho, 2018 [26]	3160	Portugal	Mixed	1992–2016	24	2, Moderate
Coutinho, 2013 [27]	106e	Portugal	Genetic testing	1998–2010	13	1, Moderate
Coutinho, 2017 [27]	232	Portugal	NR	1998–2015	15	1, Moderate
Ericzon, 2015 [28]	1623	Multiplej	NR	1990–2010	20	2, High
Franz, 2013 [29]	21	Germany	Genetic testing	1996–2011	10	2, Moderate
Gonzalez-Lopez, 2018 [30]	118	Spain	NR	NR	25	3, High
Ines, 2018 [31]	3160	Portugalk	NR	NR–2016	35	3, High
Kawaji, 2014 [32]	27	Japan	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1987–2011	7	1, Low
Lagarto, 2016 [33]	116	Portugal	Genetic testing	2006–2014	7	2, Moderate
Loavenbruck, 2016 [34]	41f	USA	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1993–2013	20	1, Low
Lobato, 2004 [35]	62	Portugal	Tissue biopsy + genetic testingp	1989–2000	9	1, Moderate
Mariani, 2015 [36]	194	Francel	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1988–2010	25	2, Low
Munar-Ques, 2005 [37]	102	Spain	Tissue biopsy ± genetic testing	1976–2003	29r	3, Moderate
Ohya, 2011 [38]	34	Japan	Tissue biopsy ± genetic testing	1994–2006	10	3, Moderate
Okamoto, 2011 [39]	104	Sweden	Tissue biopsy ± genetic testing	1990–2008	25	1, Low
Okamoto, 2009 [40]	141	Sweden	Tissue biopsy ± genetic testing	1990–2008	20	1, Low
Okumura, 2016 [41]	65	Japan	Genetic testing	1990–2010	20	2, Moderate
Plante-Bordeneuve, 1998 [42]	65	France	Genetic testing ± tissue biopsy	1988–1997	10	2, High
Suhr, 2016 [11]	264	Multiplej	NR	1991–2012	10	2, High
Suhr, 2002 [43]	51g	Sweden	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1990–2000	20	2, Moderate
Swiecicki, 2015 [44]	110 h	USA	Family history ± genetic testing	1970–2013	8	4, High
Takei, 2005 [45]	43	Japan	Genetic testing	1993–2004	10	2, Moderate
Tashima, 1998 [46]	120	Multiplem	Tissue biopsy + genetic testingq	1973–1998	24	3, Moderate
Wixner, 2015 [47]	115	Sweden	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1990–2011	9	1, Low
Yamamoto, 1998 [48]	116	Japan	Tissue biopsy + family history	1974–1995	20	4, High
Yamamoto, 2007 [49]	86	Multiplem	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1990–2005	16	1, Low
Yamashita, 2012 [50]	80	Multiplen	Tissue biopsy + genetic testing	1990–2010	20	2, Low
Yamashita, 2018 [51]	104	Japan	Tissue biopsy ± genetic testing	2000–2017	10	2, Low

HTx Heart transplantation, KTx kidney transplantation, LTx liver transplantation, mBMI modified body mass index, NR not reported

^aRefers to the time-period over which the study was conducted

^bRefers to maximum number of years from the baseline event at which survival outcomes were reported

^cEvidence grades range from 1 (best) to 4 (worst)

^dNote that two studies are reported here

^eRefers to the matched cohort of LTx (n = 53) ves. non-LTx (n  = 53)

^fRefers to the transthyretin amyloidosis cohort (n = 41) and excludes the primary amyloidosis cohort (n = 60)

^gRefers to the transthyretin amyloidosis cohort (n  = 51) and excludes the control cohort (n  = 19)

^hRefers to Val30Met (n  = 42), Ser77Tyr (n  = 15), and other mutations (n  = 53) and excludes Thr60Ala (n  = 68) and Val122Ile (n  = 28)

ⁱFrance, Germany, and Portugal

^jPortugal, France, Sweden, USA, Brazil, Spain, Japan, UK, Germany, Italy, Australia, Switzerland, Netherlands, Belgium, Argentina, Canada, Denmark, China, and Singapore

^kThe geographical origin of the patient cohort was not explicitly stated in the report. Portugal was assumed based on authors’ affiliations

^lAll patients were treated in France, but n  = 110 (57%) were Portuguese

^mSweden and Japan

ⁿJapan, Sweden, Australia, and USA

^oRefers to definitive testing performed after LTx

^pGenetic testing performed on first-degree relatives for n  = 3 (5%) patients

^qGenetic testing was performed only on patients living past 1997

^rNot reported and so imputed as the year of publication (2005) minus the earliest baseline year (1976)

Survival was first assessed descriptively and by combining the aggregate-level data into groups according to distinguishing characteristics known to the authors to impact survival (i.e., genotype, whether one has received a liver transplant, and whether one has early- or late-onset disease). This preliminary assessment (figures not shown but available upon request) confirmed the need for mixture modeling, which was conducted using disaggregated data from the 12 studies (45 observations, N = 3348) with disease onset as the baseline timepoint.

Disaggregated survival data were analyzed with parametric mixture modeling to assess survival differences among patient groups defined by factors known to affect survival. The most pronounced survival difference (reported here and subsequently as mean years from symptom onset to death) was observed between LTx and non-LTx patients: 26.0 (95% CI 25.0–27.9) versus 12.0 (95% CI 11.2–13.0); difference 15.0 (95% CI 13.7–16.3) (Fig. 2). Also significant was the survival difference between early-onset versus late-onset patients: 24.7 (95% CI 23.4–26.0) versus 12.9 (95% CI 11.0–13.8); difference 11.8 (95% CI 10.1–13.4) (Fig. 3). Combining these factors demonstrated that LTx patients with early-onset disease had significantly longer survival than LTx patients with late-onset disease: 26.6 (95% CI 25.6–27.4) versus 13.1 (95% CI 11.6–14.7); difference 13.5 (95% CI 11.7–15.3) (Fig. 4). However, the same comparison among non-LTx patients yielded a non-significant difference (12.7 vs. 12.5).

Fig. 2.

Comparison of modeled survival curves for patients who underwent liver transplantation (LTx) with those who did not (No LTx) demonstrates the survival benefit associated with LTx

Fig. 3.

Cohorts with disease that was not early onset (Not Early onset) experienced markedly shorter survival than did cohorts with early-onset disease (Early onset)

Fig. 4.

Impact of timing of disease onset. Cohorts with LTx and no early-onset disease (LTx + NO early onset) are shown to have shorter modeled survival versus cohorts with LTx and early-onset disease (LTx + Early onset)

A comparison between V30M genotype versus non-V30M genotype indicated longer survival for V30M (22.2 vs. 10.4), but the trend was not significant owing to limited observations for non-V30M patients.

Of the 35 retained studies, eight reported the outcomes of multivariate survival analysis (Table 2). Other than LTx status, the clinicopathologic survival factors identified as having a statistically significant impact on survival included sex/gender, pre-LTx disease duration, and symptoms of disease progression [e.g., modified body mass index (mBMI), serum albumin levels at the time of LTx, and the presence/absence of urinary incontinence at the time of LTx]. These observations indicated that female sex/gender, ≤ 7-year disease duration by the time of LTx, mBMI > 600, and a lack of urinary incontinence at LTx were all associated with improved survival versus matched comparisons.

Table 2.

Non-cardiac baseline prognostic survival factors and associated effects assessed by multivariate analysis

Domaina	Description	Survival difference (years)	Mitigating factor(s)
Genotype
Mariani, 2015 [36]	Val30Met vs. Non-Val30Met	1 (8 vs. 7)	Among No LTx
Mariani, 2015 [36]	Val30Met vs. Non-Val30Met	4 (17 vs. 13)	Among LTx
Sex/gender
Munar-Ques, 2005 [37]	Female vs. male	− 1 (9 vs. 10)	None reported
Okamoto, 2009 [40]	Female vs. male	≥ 4 (≥ 25 vs. 21)	Among LTx
Okamoto, 2009 [40]	Female vs. male	≥ 4 (≥ 25 vs. 21)	Among LTx with early onset
Okamoto, 2009 [40]	Female vs. male	≥ 9 (≥ 20 vs. 11)	Among LTx with late onset
Yamamoto, 1998 [48]	Female vs. male	1 (11 vs. 10)	Among no LTx
Pre-LTx disease duration
Bittencourt, 2002 [24]	< 7 years vs. ≥ 7 years	≥ 6 (≥ 7 vs. 1)	None reported
Okamoto, 2009 [40]	< 7 years vs. ≥ 7 years	≥ 4 (≥ 25 vs. 21)	None reported
Suhr, 2002 [43]	< 7 years vs. ≥ 7 years	3 (14 vs. 11)	Lower baseline mBMI in < 7 years
Yamamoto, 2007 [49]	< 7 years vs. ≥ 7 years	≥ 17 (≥ 20 vs. 3)	None reported
Biometrics/symptoms
Suhr, 2002 [43]	mBMI > 600 vs. < 600 (at LTx)	3 (14 vs. 11)	Pre-LTx disease duration was < 7 vs. ≥ 7 years
Yamamoto, 2007 [49]	mBMI > 600 vs. < 600 (at LTx)	≥ 17 (≥ 20 vs. 3)	Pre-LTx disease duration was < 7 vs. ≥ 7 years
Bittencourt, 2002 [24]	Serum albumin (at LTx)	≥ 6 (≥ 7 vs. 1)	Among LTx
Adams, 2000 [19]	Urinary incontinence (at LTx)	≥ 4 (≥ 5 vs. 1)	Among LTx

mBMI Modified body mass index

^aPresented as first author of study, year of publication [reference number]

Discussion

This synthesis of published evidence illustrates the heterogenous nature of survival among persons with ATTR-PN and highlights a number of patient subgroups for whom survival differs from the commonly-cited 10–15 years—in some cases markedly less [52]. For non-LTx patients, heterogeneity was most evident among those with non-Val30Met genotypes for whom median survival was poorer compared to persons with the ATTRv Val30Met (6.3 vs. 12.1 years after onset). Furthermore, those who underwent LTx had better survival than those who were untreated (21.8 vs. 9.6 years). Evidence of the impact of disease-modifying pharmacological treatments was limited but demonstrated survival benefits of tafamidis versus no treatment and potentially versus LTx.

Aside from genotype and treatment experience, other baseline non-cardiac clinicopathologic characteristics associated with shorter survival included longer disease duration before LTx, late-onset disease, and lower mBMI. Given the previously known associations of many of the non-cardiac clinicopathologic survival factors identified in this study with baseline disease progression and the negative relationship between baseline disease progression and survival time [53], some of our findings are unsurprising. There were, however, notable studies demonstrating the impact of competing prognostic factors on survival. For example, at 20 years of follow-up after ATTRv Val30Met onset, Okamoto et al. [40] reported a non-significant effect of sex on survival at 15 years of follow-up after disease onset for those with early-onset disease (76 vs. 78%, p = 0.33); in contrast, when the same comparison was evaluated among LTx patients with late-onset disease, the difference was significant [69% (females) vs. 37% (males); p = 0.02]. The significant effect of sex in late-onset patients—who typically present with more advanced cardiac symptoms—despite no such finding in early-onset patients highlights intra-genotype survival differences that may be mitigated by sex and disease onset. Another example was reported by Adams et al. [19] who demonstrated that the survival benefits of LTx can be entirely negated by advanced disease progression at baseline, as indicated by a Norris score ≤ 55.

We also assessed the risk of bias and evidentiary quality of the records retained in this review and, notably, both were within acceptable limits overall. These metrics were largely based on the definitiveness of the ATTRv amyloidosis diagnosis (i.e., genetic and histological testing) and the transparency by which diagnoses were reported. Given that many of the retained records reported LTx cohorts and that histological and genetic testing are often required for LTx [25, 53], it follows that the records retained for this review would be scored highly.

This study has limitations which should be noted. First, in 1996 there began a more concerted, evidence-driven effort to optimize patient selection for LTx globally [40, 53]. LTx-associated survival benefits reported here may have been downwardly biased due to our having grouped data from patients who underwent LTx in pre- and post-1996 time periods, whereas survival after LTx in a contemporary treatment setting may be longer. This implies a related limitation: that due to lack of evidence it was not possible to control for patients having been at different stages of disease progression at the time of LTx or starting other treatments. Third, this study is limited to patients who received no treatment, underwent LTx, or received tafamidis due to these being the only ATTR-PN patients with long-term survival outcomes (i.e., ≥ 5 years). There are other treatments available or currently being evaluated to treat ATTR-PN, but there are as yet insufficient survival follow-up data on these treatments. Lastly, survival is only one outcome—albeit a critical one—for evaluating ATTR-PN disease progression, whereas progression of neuropathy would also have been an informative endpoint had sufficient evidence been available. Similarly, our survival analysis did not consider the implications of cardiac sequelae, which have been reported extensively in the literature and are important because our objective was to look at the impact of non-cardiac factors.

Conclusion

Notwithstanding the aforementioned limitations, this study evaluates survival in individual ATTR-PN subgroups for whom survival has often been imprecisely defined. Our estimates indicate that 10- to 15-year survival is an overly-optimistic assumption for many patients. Median survival for untreated patients with non-Val30Met genotypes is considerably worse than that for Val30Met disease, with survival approximately 6 years from symptom onset in the former and approximately 12 years in the latter. Conversely, the 10- to 15-year survival estimate that is commonly used may underestimate the benefits of definitive treatment with LTx or disease-modifying treatment with medications. Median survival may range from 14 to 25 years from symptom onset in treated patients, depending on the genotype of the disease and the extent of disease progression by the time treatment is started. Nevertheless, the evidence presented here demonstrates that ATTR-PN is quite heterogenous and, consequently, that our understanding of the prognosis of these patients should be similarly nuanced.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.