Abstract
Abstract
The research aimed to evaluate the polyphenolic composition and the antioxidant capacity of edible extracts of feijoa (Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret) flowers. Phenolic compounds of whole feijoa flower (FM), feijoa petals (PM) and feijoa petals juice (PJ) were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray mass spectrometry and quantified by liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet/visible detection. Moreover, the total polyphenol (TP) content was measured spectrophotometrically and the antioxidant capacities of the extracts were evaluated by FRAP, CUPRAC, DPPH·, and ABTS·+ assays. The FM showed TP content (395.14 ± 7.91 mg GAE/L) higher than PM and PJ, and exhibited better antioxidant capacities. FM extracts were characterized by the high content of anthocyanins (115.3 ± 3.6 mg/L), flavonols (42.9 ± 3.3 mg/L) and the presence of ellagic acid (7.9 ± 0.2 mg/L) and other galloyltannins. In addition, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and apigenin were detected in all the three extracts. The present study provided an overview on particular bioactive compounds that characterise different parts of edible feijoa flowers. Among the latter, FM proved to be the most suitable for exploitation in the food and health manufactory.
Graphic abstract
Keywords: Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret, Anthocyanins, Antioxidant activity, HPLC–DAD, (HR) LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS/MS
Introduction
There is a rising consumer demand for healthy natural products, from herbal drugs to single active pharmaceutical ingredients, and new vegetable sources are highly appreciated (Oga et al. 2016). Flowers represent a valuable source of compounds which affect target functions of the organism in a positive way (Fernandes et al. 2017) and could be considered as a new frontier in vegetable sustainable exploitation to obtain products with nutraceutical interest. Currently, some flowers are used either unprocessed or processed in different formulations for the health and food industry (Ammar et al. 2015; Fernandes et al. 2017). Feijoa (Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret) is a plant which belongs to the Myrtaceae family and is typical from Brazil, but it also widely grows in parts of the USA, in the Mediterranean area, in New Zealand and in Australia (Weston 2010). It is well known for its edible fruits, which have a smooth, green skin and soft, white, sweet flesh with a very aromatic flavour (Weston 2010). In addition to the fruits, the petals of the flowers are being eaten, usually in salads, sweets and as dish decorations (De Souza et al. 2016), since they possess a pleasant taste and intense colour. These flowers are formed by four to six fleshy petals, rose-coloured inside and white outside, with red stamens reaching up to 2 cm above the flower, and slightly thickened stigma (Belous et al. 2014).
Considering the massive flower production of the feijoa plant, which fits well with a possible exploitation by food supplements, confectionery industry and pharmaceutical manufactory, the aim of this research was to evaluate the potential nutritional interest of edible feijoa flowers, evaluating their antioxidant capacity and the presence of bioactive compounds. To date, only few data on these compounds of feijoa flower buds and their health properties have been published (Aoyama et al. 2018). In that study, acetone extract showed the presence of pedunculagin, gallic acid, cyanidin glucoside, flavone, ellagic acid and gossypetin arabinofuranoside. In this new study, the content in phenolic compounds with potential biological activities were intensively evaluated in different edible extracts of feijoa flowers (whole macerate flowers, petal macerate and petal juice), by assessing a quali-quantitative analysis by high resolution mass spectrometry ((HR) LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS and (HR) LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS/MS) and HPLC–DAD. In addition, the total polyphenol (TP) and reducing sugars content was measured, and the antioxidant and antiradical capacities of the extracts were evaluated by FRAP, CUPRAC, DPPH·, and ABTS·+ assays.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
All the chemicals used were of analytical grade. Standard of phenolic compounds were purchased from Extrasynthese (Genay Cedex, France). Methanol, acetonitrile, ferrous sulphate, phosphoric acid 85% w/w, sodium carbonate, ammonium acetate, ferric chloride, CuSO4·5H2O, CuCl2·2H2O, potassium persulphate, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH·), (±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (TPTZ), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate radical cation (ABTS·+), neocuproine (2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline) hydrochloride, Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent and gallic acid were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Acetonitrile, water and formic acid of LC–MS grade were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Food grade ethanol (95% v/v) was purchased from Bellini srl (Paratico, BS, Italy). Ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm) was obtained with a Milli-Q Advantage A10 System apparatus (Millipore, Milan, Italy).
Feijoa flower samples
Acca sellowiana (O.Berg) Burret mature flowers (3.0 kg in triplicate) from cultivated growing plants were randomly harvested in May 2017 in an experimental field in Cagliari (Sardinia, Italy; 39°13′49.0″N 9°08′03.1″E) by professional pickers. The specimens were identified by Prof. Gianluigi Bacchetta (University of Cagliari, Italy) and voucher number DISVA.ALI.01.2017 was deposited at the Department of Life and Environmental Sciences of the University of Cagliari (Italy). After the collection, the flowers were cleaned and separated to obtain whole feijoa flowers (FM), feijoa petals (PM) and feijoa petals juice (PJ) extracts. Feijoa petals were manually separated by cutting the petal at the junction with the receptacle. FM and PM were obtained by adding an EtOH:H2O mixture (80:20 v/v) to the plant material (solvent:plant ratio 9:1 v/w). The macerates were extracted using ultrasonic bath (3 cycles of 30 min, t = 10 ± 2 °C) and the liquid phase was separated from the plant material. The extracting procedure was performed once again by adding fresh solvent and the two-liquid phase were reunited. PJ extracts were obtained squeezing the feijoa petals using a Polsinelli Enologia mod. ALU2530 stainless steel manual press (Isola del Liri, FR, Italy). The FM, PM and PJ extracts were freeze-dried and stored at − 20 °C in dark glass vials.
Determination of total polyphenol content (Folin–Ciocalteu’s assay), total reducing power (FRAP and CUPRAC assays) and free radical scavenging activity (DPPH· and ABTS·+ assays)
All assays were performed spectrophotometrically on the samples diluted with H2O and spectrophotometric readings were carried out with a Cary 50 spectrophotometer (Varian, Leinì, TO, Italy) using 10 mm Kartell® plastic cuvette. TP content was determined with a modified Folin–Ciocalteu’s method (Tuberoso et al. 2013) by adding 100 μL of sample to 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent. After 5 min, 3 mL of 10% Na2CO3 (w/v) was added, the mixture was shaken and then diluted with water to a final volume of 10 mL. After a 90 min incubation period at room temperature, the absorbance was read at 725 nm against a blank. The total polyphenols content results, expressed as mg/L of gallic acid equivalent (GAE), were obtained using a calibration curve of a freshly prepared gallic acid standard solution (10–200 mg/L). The FRAP assay was assessed preparing a ferric complex of 2,4,6-tris(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine (TPTZ) and Fe3+ (0.3123 g TPTZ, 0.5406 g FeCl3·6H2O in 100 mL acetate buffer pH 3.6) according to Tuberoso et al. (2013). Twenty μL of sample were dissolved in 2 mL of ferric complex and, after an incubation period of 4 min in the dark, absorbance at 593 nm was measured. CUPRAC assay was performed according to Bektaşǒglu et al. (2006) with some modifications. Briefly, 100 μL of sample were dissolved in a mixture of 500 μL of 10 mM CuCl2 solution in water, 500 μL of 7.5 mM neocuproine solution in methanol, and 500 μL of 1.0 M CH3COONH4 buffer at pH = 7.0. After an incubation period of 30 min in the dark, absorbance at 450 nm was measured. For both FRAP and CUPRAC assays results were expressed as mmol/L of Fe2+ because quantitative analysis was performed according to the external standard method using 0.1–2 mmol/L FeSO4.
The DPPH· assay is based on the ability of the antioxidant to scavenge the radical cation 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (Tuberoso et al. 2013). Fifty microliters of sample were dissolved in 2 mL of 0.06 mmol/L DPPH· in methanol. Then, spectrophotometric readings were carried out at 517 nm after an incubation period of 60 min in the dark.
The ABTS·+ assay was performed according to Re et al. (1999) with some modifications. The ABTS·+ cation radical was produced by the reaction between 10 mL of 2 mM ABTS in H2O and 100 μL of 70 mM potassium persulfate, stored in the dark at room temperature for 24 h. The ABTS·+ solution was then diluted with methanol to obtain an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at λ = 734 nm, and was equilibrated at 30 °C. Samples were prepared in triplicate by diluting 20 μL of extracts (same dilution of DPPH·+ assay) in 2 mL of the ABTS·+ solution diluted with methanol. After 1 min of reaction, absorbances were recorded at 734 nm. DPPH· and ABTS·+ data were reported as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC, mmol/L) because quantification was carried out by using a Trolox calibration curve in the range of 0.05–1.0 mmol/L.
LC–MS/MS and HPLC–DAD analyses
The electrospray ionisation (ESI) source of a Thermo Scientific LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) was tuned in negative ion mode with a standard solution of kaempferol-3-O-glucoside (1 µg/mL) introduced at a flow rate of 5 μL/min by a syringe pump. Calibration of the Orbitrap analyser was performed using the standard LTQ calibration mixture composed by caffeine and the peptide MRFA (calibration solution purchased from the manufacturer), dissolved in 50:50% v/v water/acetonitrile solution. Resolution for the Orbitrap mass analyser was set at 30,000. The mass spectrometric spectra were acquired by full range acquisition covering m/z 180–1600 in LC–MS. The data recorded were processed with Xcalibur 2.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
LC-ESI-LIT Orbitrap MS was performed using a Finnigan Surveyor HPLC (Thermo Fisher, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled to a hybrid Linear Ion Trap (IT) Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Analyses were performed using a Kinetex Evo C18 (150 mm × 2.1 mm particle size 5 µm) column, eluted with water containing 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (solvent B). A linear gradient program at a flow rate of 0.200 mL/min was used: 0 to 20 min, from 5 to 15% (B); 20 to 40 min, from 15 to 35% (B); 40 to 50 min from 35 to 100% (B) then to 100% (B) for 5 min and back to 5% (B) for other 5 min. 10 µL of a solution 1 mg/mL of feijoa extracts in water was injected. The ESI source and MS parameters were the same used by D’Urso et al. (2017).
Detection and quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds were carried out using an HPLC–DAD method as described by Tuberoso et al. (2017). The extracts diluted with ultrapure water were filtered through Econofilter RC membrane (0.45 μm, Ø 25 mm, Agilent Technologies, Milan, Italy) and injected into the HPLC column without any further purification. The calibration curves were built with the method of external standard, correlating the area of the peaks versus the concentration. Standards of ellagic acid, quercetin-3-O-galactoside, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, quercetin, kaempferol, apigenin, delphinidin-3-O-glucoside, and cyanidin-3-O-glucoside were used. The full validation procedure, in agreement with the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidance note (ICH 2005), is reported by Tuberoso et al. (2017).
Determination of dry residue and reducing sugars
The dry matter of feijoa flowers extracts was evaluated by drying 1000 µL of solution for 2 h in a thermostatic oven at 105 ± 1 °C and weighing until a constant weight value was attained. Glucose and fructose contents were determined using the ENZYTEC™ d-Glucose/d-Fructose/Sucrose E1247 assay kit according to the producer procedure (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany).
Statistical analysis
The GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to calculate the means and standard deviations of three independent experiments, involving triplicate analysis for each sample. Evaluation of statistical significance of differences was performed by one-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA). The statistical analysis was done using 2-way analysis of variance, followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. All data are expressed as means ± standard error of the means. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
LC-ESI-Orbitrap MS phenolic identification in FM, PM and PJ feijoa products
Edible feijoa flowers extracts were intensively investigated for the first time, and the profile is substantially different from feijoa fruits polyphenolic extracts and feijoa leaves polyphenolic extracts, which were more investigated (El-Shenawy et al. 2008; Ruberto and Tringali, 2004). (HR) LC-ESI-Orbitrap MS and (HR) LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS/MS analysis of extracts from different parts of feijoa flowers were conducted in negative and positive ion mode. Individual components were identified by comparison of their m/z values extracted in the Total Ion Courrent (TIC) profile with those of the selected compounds described in literature characterised by Orbitrap MS/MS (Table 1) for feijoa fruits, feijoa leaves and other plant species. LC-ESI-Orbitrap MS/MS experiments were run by using Dependent Data Scan, in order to submit the major ions in TIC profiles to fragmentation experiments using the source and trap parameters previously selected by ESI–MS and ESI–MS/MS direct introduction experiments. Table 1 reports identification of compounds, based on High Resolution Mass Spectrometric Data, chemical formula derived by accurate mass mensuration, retention times, MS/MS results and references used for identification. High resolution mass values are all not differing more than 5 ppm respect to the exact mass calculated for the same molecule.
Table 1.
Compounds identification by LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS in feijoa flowers macerate (FM), feijoa petals macerate (PM), and feijoa petals juice (PJ)
RT | Molecular formula | ppm | MSMS | Identity | References | FM | PM | PJ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[M–H]− | ||||||||||
1 | 5.19 | 783.0662 | C34H23O22 | − 0.59 | 764/481/301 | Pedunculagin | Aoyama et al. (2018), D’Urso et al. (2017), de Lira Teixeira et al. (2015) | x | x | - |
2 | 7.90 | 933.0621 | C41H25O26 | − 0.72 | – | Castalagin | El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | - | - |
3 | 8.77 | 783.0662 | C34H23O22 | − 0.59 | 764/481/301 | Pedunculagin isomer | Aoyama et al. (2018), D’Urso et al. (2017), de Lira Teixeira et al. (2015) | x | x | - |
4 | 12.61 | 633.0720 | C27H22O18 | − 0.22 | 513/469/330 | Strictinin | Fukuda et al. (2003) | x | - | - |
5 | 16.38 | 785.0831 | C34H25O22 | − 0.13 | 683/433/301 | Tellimagrandin I | Baxter et al. (1999) | x | - | - |
6 | 16.71 | 483.1012 | C20H19O11 | 1.10 | 301/257 | Nilocitin | Mahmoud et al. (2001) | x | - | - |
7 | 20.44 | 321.1553 | C14H25O8 | 2.80 | 179/143/113/89 | Glucitol-tetramethyl-diacetate | Wang et al. (2013) | x | x | x |
8 | 21.28 | 935.0783 | C41H28O26 | − 0.20 | 765/545 | Casuarinin | Baxter et al. (1999) | x | - | - |
9 | 23.98 | 433.0402 | C19H13O12 | 0.09 | 301 | Ellagic acid pentoside isomer I | Ferreres et al. (2013) | x | - | - |
10 | 24.19 | 477.0662 | C21H17O13 | − 0.26 | 315 | Methyl ellagic acid glucoside | Wu et al. (2008) | x | x | - |
11 | 24.96 | 433.0402 | C19H13O12 | 0.09 | 301 | Ellagic acid pentoside isomer II | Ferreres et al. (2013) | x | - | - |
12 | 25.16 | 300.9987 | C14H5O8 | 0.10 | 257/229/185 | Ellagic acid | El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | - |
13 | 25.58 | 463.0871 | C21H19O12 | − 0.01 | 301 | Quercetin galactoside (hyperin) | El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | x |
14 | 25.76 | 447.0957 | C21H19O11 | − 0.94 | 285 | Kaempferol hexoside | Doi et al. (2001) | x | x | x |
15 | 26.15 | 463.0871 | C21H19O12 | − 0.01 | 301 | Quercetin glucoside (isoquercitrin) | El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | x |
16 | 26.16 | 455.2121 | C19H35O12 | − 0.45 | 409/240 | Unknown | x | x | x | |
17 | 26.50 | 579.1348 | C26H27O15 | 0.50 | 285/429/447/255 | Kaempferol-di-rhamnoside (kaempferitrin) | Jaiswal et al. (2014) | x | x | x |
18 | 27.19 | 433.0761 | C20H17O11 | − 0.91 | 301 | Quercetin xyloside | Aoyama et al. (2018), El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | - |
19 | 27.63 | 433.0761 | C20H17O11 | − 0.98 | 301 | Quercetin arabinoside | Aoyama et al. (2018), El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | x |
20 | 28.51 | 431.0967 | C21H19O10 | − 1.16 | 269 | Apigenin-hexoside | Zhu et al. (2015) | x | x | x |
21 | 28.98 | 447.0918 | C21H19O11 | − 0.73 | 285 | Kaempferol galactoside | Wu et al. (2008) | x | x | x |
22 | 30.17 | 315.0139 | C15H7O8 | 0.15 | 301 | Methyl ellagic acid | Wu et al. (2008) | x | - | - |
23 | 30.38 | 447.0918 | C21H19O11 | − 0.73 | 285 | Kaempferol glucoside | Doi et al. (2001) | x | x | x |
24 | 30.57 | 551.1034 | C24H23O15 | 0.40 | 343 | Phosphatidylcholine | Wu et al. (2008) | x | x | - |
25 | 31.14 | 301.0349 | C15H9O7 | 0.01 | 179/ 151 | Quercetin | El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | x |
26 | 34.73 | 394.9716 | C15H7O11S | 0.01 | 315 | Methyl ellagic acid sulphate isomer I | Horai et al. (2010) | x | - | - |
27 | 35.02 | 285.0452 | C15H9O6 | 1.85 | 187/ 159 | Kaempferol | El-Shenawy et al. (2008) | x | x | x |
28 | 37.53 | 394.9705 | C15H7O11S | 0.16 | 315 | Methyl ellagic acid sulphate isomer II | Horai et al. (2010) | x | - | - |
29 | 38.87 | 269.1234 | C15H9O5 | 2.90 | 183/ 151 | Apigenin | Zhu et al. (2015) | x | x | x |
[M]+/[M–H]+ | ||||||||||
30 | 18.38 | 627.1533 | C27H31O17 | 2.10 | 465/303 | Delphinidin di-glucoside | Sarais et al. (2016) | x | - | - |
31 | 20.97 | 465.1008 | C21H21O12 | 0.90 | 303 | Delphinidin-glucoside | Sarais et al. (2016) | x | x | - |
32 | 22.20 | 435.0909 | C20H19O11 | − 1.27 | 303 | Delphinidin-pentoside | Sarais et al. (2016) | x | x | - |
33 | 23.43 | 449.1055 | C21H21O11 | − 2.3 | 287 | Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside | Sarais et al. (2016) | x | x | x |
34 | 30.56 | 614.2832 | C37H42O8 | 2.35 | 438/420 | Unknown | x | x | - | |
35 | 33.79 | 343.2945 | C20H39O4 | − 5.02 | 240 | Unknown | x | x | x | |
36 | 37.26 | 327.2171 | C18H33O5 | 0.53 | Non fragmented | Unknown | - | - | x | |
37 | 39.38 | 329.2328 | C18H31O5 | 0.53 | Non fragmented | Unknown | - | - | x |
x, detected; -, not detected
The negative LC–MS metabolic profiles highlighted the presence of a large group of compounds, of which 26 were phenolic compounds, corresponding to flavone glycosides and ellagic acid derivatives (Table 1, Fig. 1). The positive LC–MS metabolic profiles highlighted instead the presence of several anthocyanins (Table 1).
Fig. 1.
LC-ESI-Orbitrap MS total ion chromatogram acquired in negative ion mode for whole feijoa flower (FM), feijoa petals (PM) and feijoa petals juice (PJ). LC and MS conditions are reported in the experimental section. Compound number as reported in Table 1
Compounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 22, 26, 28 were identified as compounds pertaining to the galloyltannins class, and most of them are derivatives of ellagic acid. It is interesting to note that these molecules were found only in FM and in PM, but not in PJ extracts. Compounds 2, castalagin and 12, ellagic acid, were previously identified in A. sellowiana leaves (El-Shenawy et al. 2008; Ruberto and Tringali 2004). Compound 1 and 3 showed a pseudomolecular ion at m/z 783.0679 that produced in MS/MS a similar fragmentation pattern. After MS/MS analysis, fragment ions at m/z 301 (ellagic acid; [M − 482]−, loss of HHDP hexose) and at m/z 481 (deprotonated HHDP hexose; [M − 302]−, loss of HHDP), were evident, thus compounds were identified as di-HHDP hexose, presumably pedunculagin and its isomer; the fragmentation pattern was in accordance with pedunculagin (D’Urso et al. 2017) in Myrtus communis. Moreover, pedunculagin was previously reported in flower buds of Feijoa sellowiana (Aoyama et al. 2018). Compound 4, strictinin, showing a HR-MS value at m/z 785.0831 corresponding to a formula C27H22O18, was identified by comparing data with literature, the compounds was previously found in walnuts (the seeds of Juglans regia L.) (Fukuda et al. 2003). Compound 5, tellimagrandin I, m/z 785.0831, C34H25O22, and compound 8, casuarinin, accurate mass value 935.0783 m/z, with formula C41H28O26 were reported in Phytochemical Dictionary published (Baxter et al. 1999). Compound 6, nilocitin, 483.1012, corresponding to the molecular formula C20H19O11, was putatively identified by comparison with data published (Mahmoud et al. 2001). Compounds 10 and 22 were identified as respectively methyl ellagic acid glucoside and methyl ellagic acid (Wu et al. 2008). Compounds 9 and 11 were identified as isomers of ellagic acid pentoside derivative isomers, with m/z value of 433.0402 and molecular formula of C19H13O12. Compounds 26 and 28 were putatively identified by using Mass Bank by comparing their m/z values and their MS/MS fragmentation (Horai et al. 2010). Compounds 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 were identified in all the three different extracts as flavonoids and their glycosylated forms. In particular, aglycones occurrent in feijoa flowers are quercetin, kaempferol, and apigenin. Glycosylation are possible both with hexose and pentose sugar. The occurrence of the single metabolites is different among the three extracts under identification and it is reported in Table 1. In addition, LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS was conducted in positive ion mode with the aim to identify the presence metabolites pertaining to the group of anthocyanins. Different peaks were observed in the positive TIC profiles, and four of them were attributed to anthocyanins and specifically to delphinidin glycosylated derivatives and cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (compounds 30, 31, 32 and 33). Their identification was confirmed by comparison with literature data (Sarais et al. 2016).
HPLC–DAD analysis of major phenolic classes in feijoa flowers
Targeted phenolic compounds were dosed by HPLC–DAD analysis (Table 2). Among them, anthocyanins, flavonols and ellagitannins were the most represented, while hydroxycinnamic acids and benzoic acids were not detected. Although FM and PM showed similar composition, quantitative differences were observed. For instance, quercetin-3-O-galactoside was more concentrated in FM (12.4 ± 0.4 mg/L) and kaempferol-3-O-hexoside in PM (25.6 ± 1.6 mg/L). The most concentrated flavonol in PJ was apigenin (3.4 ± 0.2 mg/L). All these flavonols exert important activities in improving health, as has often been demonstrated through different studies (Lu et al. 2016). Anthocyanins were largely detected in FM (115.3 ± 3.6 mg/L), probably because of the presence of numerous intense red stamens (Ramirez and Kallarackal 2017) which are known to be a source of anthocyanins in flowers (Mori et al. 2009). Among anthocyanins, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside resulted to be the most represented on all the three extracts (115.3 ± 3.6, 31.7 ± 1.0 and 10.5 ± 0.4 mg/L in FM, PM and PJ, respectively). Anthocyanins are known to strongly contribute to antioxidant capacity and anti-inflammatory properties of fruit and vegetables (Święciło et al. 2018), which can reduce the risk of chronic diseases involving oxidative stress and inflammation. Specifically, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside is well-known for being one of the major anthocyanins in berries (Veberic et al. 2015) and for positive effects on counteracting oxidative damage and inflammation. Furthermore, it proved to have a significantly higher relative bioavailability (Diaconeasa et al. 2017). Ellagitannins were mainly dosed in FM and ellagic acid resulted to be the most concentrated (7.9 ± 0.2 mg/L). These compounds together with condensed tannins proved to have much greater free radical scavenging ability than ascorbic acid, tocopherols and low-molecular weight polyphenols (Szajdek and Borowska 2008). This class of compounds is also well-known to exert several biological effects as anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial agents and may be protective against different chronic diseases (Landete 2011).
Table 2.
Targeted phenolic compounds determined by HPLC–DAD analysis (mg/L, mean ± SD)
Compound | Identificationa | LOD | LOQ | Feijoa flowers extract | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mg/L | mg/L | Flower macerate (FM) | Petal macerate (PM) | Petal juice (PJ) | ||
Galloyltannins | ||||||
Pedunculaginb | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.0a ± 0.0 | nd | nd |
Pedunculaginisomerb | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.2a ± 0.1 | nd | nd |
Ellagic acid pentoside isomer Ib | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.8a ± 0.1 | nd | nd |
Methyl ellagic acid glucosideb | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.0a ± 0.0 | nd | nd |
Ellagic acid pentoside isomer IIb | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.1 | tr | nd | nd |
Ellagic acid | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.1 | 7.9a ± 0.2 | 0.4b ± 0.0 | nd |
Total | 15.0a ± 0.9 | 0.4b ± 0.0 | nd | |||
FLAVONOLS | ||||||
Quercetin-3-O-galactoside | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.6 | 1.8 | 12.4a ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | nd |
Kaempferol-3-O-hexosidec | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | 5.9a ± 0.1 | 25.6b ± 1.6 | 1.2c ± 0.0 |
Quercetin-3-O-glucoside | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.6 | 1.8 | 3.4a ± 0.2 | tr | nd |
Kaempferol-di-rhamnosidec | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | 3.2a ± 0.1 | tr | nd |
Apigenin hexosided | UV–VIS, MS | 0.6 | 1.8 | 3.9a ± 0.1 | 4.6b ± 0.1 | nd |
Kaempferol-3-O-hexosidec | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | 5.5a ± 0.2 | 6.8b ± 0.2 | nd |
Quercetin | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.6a ± 0.0 | 2.5a ± 0.2 | nd |
Kaempferol | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.3 | 4.3a ± 0.1 | 1.8b ± 0.2 | nd |
Apigenin | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.7a ± 0.0 | 1.7a ± 0.1 | 3.4b ± 0.2 |
Total | 42.9a ± 3.3 | 45.1a ± 2.1 | 4.7b ± 0.5 | |||
Anthocyanins | ||||||
Delphinidin di-glucosidee | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | tr | tr | nd |
Delphinidin-3-O-glucoside | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | tr | tr | nd |
Delphinidin-pentosidee | UV–VIS, MS | 0.4 | 1.2 | tr | tr | nd |
Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside | Rt, UV–VIS, MS | 0.5 | 1.6 | 115.3a ± 3.6 | 31.7b ± 1.0 | 10.5c ± 0.4 |
Total | 115.3a ± 3.6 | 31.7b ± 1.0 | 10.5c ± 0.4 |
Results are reported as the mean value ± standard deviation; n = 3
Different superscript letters in each row indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05)
nd, not detected (< LOD); tr, traces (< LOQ)
aRt, comparison with retention time of pure standard; UV–VIS, comparison with UV–VIS spectra of pure compound or similar pure standards; MS, comparison with LC/ESI/QqQ/MS spectra of pure compound or literature data (see references in Table 1);
bDosed with the calibration curve of ellagic acid
cDosed with the calibration curve of kaempferol-3-O-glucoside
dDosed with the calibration curve of apigenin
eDosed with the calibration curve of delphinidin-3-O-glucoside
Antioxidant capacity and reducing sugars content of feijoa flowers
Results of the antioxidant capacity assessed by FRAP, CUPRAC, DPPH·, and ABTS·+ assays and the TP content dosed by Folin–Ciocalteu’s assay are reported in Table 3. It can be seen that FM had far apart the best antioxidant activity among the flower parts studied (20.99 ± 1.34 mmol Fe2+/L vs. 3.59 ± 0.03 and 0.97 ± 0.08 mmol Fe2+/L of PM and PJ, respectively). This outcome could be explained as FM proved to be three to fourfold more concentrated in polyphenols (395.14 ± 7.91 mg GAE/L) than PM (98.59 ± 7.89 mg GAE/L) and PJ (114.53 ± 9.46 mg GAE/L). This high content in polyphenol contained in FM confirmed the data obtained by the HPLC–DAD analysis. The FM total polyphenol content was comparable to that of a decoction/infusion of other edible flowers such as Opuntia ficus-indica (Ammar et al. 2015) and Hibiscus sabdariffa (Prenesti et al. 2007) ones, which as well as feijoa flowers have been considered for human consumption. Thus, it is conceivable that FM could be, among feijoa flowers products, better exploitable in the perspective of a novel nutraceutical product design. On the other hand, PJ contains detectable amounts of fructose and glucose (6.40 ± 0.58 and 3.14 ± 0.58% w/v respectively, data not shown), which are present in traces in PM and absent in FM. This could make the juice from feijoa petals particularly appreciated for preparing sweet edible products without adding exogenous sweeteners.
Table 3.
Antioxidant capacity and total polyphenol content of different extracts of feijoa flowers
Parameter | Extract | ||
---|---|---|---|
Flower macerate (FM) | Petal macerate (PM) | Petal juice (PJ) | |
FRAPa (mmol Fe2+/L) | 20.99a ± 1.34 | 3.59b ± 0.03 | 0.97c ± 0.08 |
CUPRACa (mmol Fe2+/L) | 7.62a ± 0.46 | 1.46b ± 0.11 | 1.09c ± 0.07 |
DPPHb (mmol TEAC/L) | 2.30a ± 0.14 | 0.40b ± 0.00 | 0.16c ± 0.01 |
ABTS·+b (mmol TEAC/L) | 9.35a ± 0.42 | 1.53b ± 0.12 | 1.72b ± 0.14 |
Total polyphenolsc (mg GAE/L) | 395.14a ± 7.91 | 98.59b ± 7.89 | 114.53b ± 9.46 |
Results are reported as the mean value ± standard deviation; n = 3
Different superscript letters in each row indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05)
aFRAP and CUPRAC values are expressed as Fe2+ millimolar concentration, obtained from a FeSO4 solution having an antioxidant capacity equivalent to that of the dilution of the feijoa macerate/juice
bDPPH· and ABTS·+ values are expressed as TEAC millimolar concentration, obtained from a Trolox solution having an antiradical capacity equivalent to that of the dilution of the feijoa macerate/juice
cGAE, gallic acid equivalent
Conclusion
This research represents the first comprehensive study on the chemical composition of edible A. sellowiana flowers, whose massive production makes them suitable to exploitation as source of antioxidant compounds. The preliminary analyses of different extracts of this product, assessed by LC–MS/MS and HPLC–DAD, revealed an interesting content of ellagitannins, anthocyanins and flavonoids. FM macerate showed the highest concentration of these compounds, which was reflected in the hugest antioxidant activity among the three extracts. However, also the two other extracts which were studied, namely PM and PJ, possessed good anthocyanins and reducing sugar concentration, respectively. In particular, PJ could be used directly as a food, as it is currently done in different world regions, or added to beverages and smoothies for improving their nutraceutical properties. Therefore, feijoa flowers, which can be found widespread on all continents, could be recommended for the extraction of bioactive compounds and the preparation of nutraceuticals and dietary supplements, whose request in the international marketplace is increasing.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Fondazione di Sardegna under the project “Innovative antioxidant molecules for the food and health industry” (CUP F71I17000180002). The authors thank Dr. Angelo Farris and Dr. Anna Mereu for supplying samples, and Dr. Lorenzo Melis for helpful discussion.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Ammar I, Ennouri M, Bouaziz M, Ben Amira A, Attia H. Phenolic profiles, phytochemicals and mineral content of decoction and infusion of Opuntia ficus-indica flowers. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2015;70:388–394. doi: 10.1007/s11130-015-0505-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aoyama H, Sakagami HT, Hatano T. Three new flavonoids, proanthocyanidin, and accompanying phenolic constituents from Feijoa sellowiana. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;82:31–41. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2017.1412246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baxter H, Harborne JB, Moss GP. Phytochemical dictionary. 2. Oxford: Taylor and Francis; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Bektaşǒglu B, Esin Celik S, Ozyürek M, Güçlü K, Apak R. Novel hydroxyl radical scavenging antioxidant activity assay for water-soluble antioxidants using a modified CUPRAC method. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;345:1194–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belous O, Omarov M, Omarova Z. Chemical composition of fruits of a feijoa (Feijoa sellowiana) in the conditions of subtropics of Russia. Potr S J F Sci. 2014;8:119–123. doi: 10.5219/358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- D’Urso G, Sarais G, Lai C, Pizza C, Montoro P. LC–MS based metabolomics study of different parts of myrtle berry from Sardinia (Italy) J Berry Res. 2017;7:217–229. doi: 10.3233/JBR-170158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- De Lira Teixeira TL, Cleber Bertoldi F, Lajolo FM, Hassimotto NMA. Identification of ellagitannins and flavonoids from Eugenia brasilienses Lam. (Grumixama) by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:5417–5427. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Souza AG, Do Amarante CVT, Steffens CA, Benincá TD, Padilha M. Postharvest quality of Feijoa flowers treated with different preservative solutions and 1-methylcyclopropene. Rev Bras Frutic SP. 2016;38:e-759. [Google Scholar]
- Diaconeasa Z, Ayvaz H, Ruginǎ D, Leopold L, Stǎnilǎ A, Socaciu C, Tăbăran F, Luput L, Mada DC, Pintea A, Jefferson A. Melanoma inhibition by anthocyanins is associated with the reduction of oxidative stress biomarkers and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential. Plant Foods Hum Nut. 2017;72:404–410. doi: 10.1007/s11130-017-0638-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doi K, Kojima T, Makino M, Kimura Y, Fujimoto Y. Studies on the constituents of the leaves of Morus alba L. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 2001;49:151–153. doi: 10.1248/cpb.49.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Shenawy SM, Marzouk MS, El Dib RA, Elyazed HEA, Shaffie NM, Moharram FA. Polyphenols and biological activities of Feijoa sellowiana leaves and twigs. Rev Latinoam Quím. 2008;36:103–120. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes L, Casal L, Pereira JA, Ramalhosa E. Edible flowers: a review of the nutritional, antioxidant, antimicrobial properties and effects on human health. J Food Compos Anal. 2017;60:38–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.03.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreres F, Grosso C, Gil-Izquierdo A, Valentao P, Andrade PB. Ellagic acid and derivatives from Cochlospermum angolensis Welw. extracts: HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn profiling, quantification and in vitro anti-depressant, anti-cholinesterase and anti-oxidant activities. Phytochem Anal. 2013;24:534–540. doi: 10.1002/pca.2429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuda T, Ito H, Yoshida T. Antioxidative polyphenols from walnuts (Juglans regia L.) Phytochemistry. 2003;63:795–801. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00333-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horai H, Arita M, Kanaya S, Nihei Y, Ikeda T, Suwa K, Ojima Y, Tanaka K, Tanaka S, Aoshima K, Oda Y, Kakazu Y, Kusano M, Tohge T, Matsuda F, Sawada Y, Yokota Hirai M, Nakanishi H, Ikeda K, Akimoto N, Maoka T, Takahashi H, Ara T, Sakurai N, Suzuki H, Shibata D, Neumann S, Iida T, Tanaka K, Funatsu K, Matsuura F, Soga T, Taguchi R, Saito K, Nishioka T. MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45:703–714. doi: 10.1002/jms.1777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICH Topic Q2 (R1) (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2018
- Jaiswal R, Karar MG, Gadir HA, Kuhnert N. Identification and characterisation of phenolics from Ixora coccinea L. (Rubiaceae) by liquid chromatography multi-stage mass spectrometry. Phytochem Anal. 2014;25:567–576. doi: 10.1002/pca.2530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landete JM. Ellagitannins, ellagic acid and their derived metabolites: a review about source, metabolism, functions and health. Food Res Int. 2011;44:1150–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu B, Li M, Yin R. Phytochemical content, health benefits, and toxicology of common edible flower: a review (2000–2015) Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56:130–148. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1078276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahmoud II, Marzouk MS, Moharram FA, El-Gindi MR, Hassan AM. Acylated flavonol glycosides from Eugenia jambolana leaves. Phytochemistry. 2001;58:1239–1244. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00365-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mori M, Kondo T, Yoshida K. Anthocyanin components and mechanism for color development in Blue Veronica flowers. Biosci Biotechol Biochem. 2009;73:2329–2331. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oga EF, Sekine S, Shitara Y, Horie T. Pharmacokinetic herb-drug interactions: insight into mechanisms and consequences. Eur J Drug Metab Ph. 2016;41:93–108. doi: 10.1007/s13318-015-0296-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prenesti E, Berto S, Daniele PG, Toso S. Antioxidant power quantification of decoction and cold infusions of Hibiscus sabdariffa flowers. Food Chem. 2007;100:433–438. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez F, Kallarackal J. Feijoa [Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret] pollination: a review. Sci Hort. 2017;226:333–334. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruberto G, Tringali C. Secondary metabolites from the leaves of Feijoa sellowiana Berg. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:2947–2951. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarais G, D'Urso G, Lai C, Pirisi FM, Pizza C, Montoro P. Targeted and untargeted mass spectrometric approaches in discrimination between Myrtus communis cultivars from Sardinia region. J Mass Spectrom. 2016;51:704–715. doi: 10.1002/jms.3811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Święciło A, Rybczyńska-Tkaczyk K, Najda A, Krzepiłko A, Prażak R, Zawiślak G. Application of growth tests employing a Δsod1 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study the antioxidant activity of berry fruit extracts. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2018;94:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Szajdek A, Borowska EJ. Bioactive compounds and health-promoting properties of berry fruits: a review. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2008;63:147–156. doi: 10.1007/s11130-008-0097-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuberoso CIG, Boban M, Bifulco E, Budimir D, Pirisi FM. Antioxidant capacity and vasodilatory properties of Mediterranean food: the case of Cannonau wine, myrtle berries liqueur and strawberry-tree honey. Food Chem. 2013;140:686–691. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuberoso CIG, Serreli G, Congiu F, Montoro P, Fenu MA. Characterization, phenolic profile, nitrogen compounds and antioxidant activity of Carignano wines. J Food Compos Anal. 2017;58:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.01.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Veberic R, Slatnar A, Bizjak J, Stampar F, Mikulic-Petkovsek M. Anthocyanin composition of different wild and cultivated berry species. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2015;60:509–517. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K-P, Zhang Q-L, Liu Y, Wang J, Cheng Y, Zhang Y. Structure and inducing tumor cell apoptosis activity of polysaccharides isolated from Lentinus edodes. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:9849–9858. doi: 10.1021/jf403291w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weston RJ. Bioactive products from fruit of the feijoa (Feijoa sellowiana, Myrtaceae): a review. Food Chem. 2010;21:923–926. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu S-H, Chen Y-W, Yang L-Y, Li S-L, Li Z-Y. A new ellagic acid glycoside from Paeonia delavayi. Fitoterapia. 2008;79:474–475. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu S, Yan H, Niu K, Zhang S. Simultaneous determination of seven components from hawthorn leaves flavonoids in rat plasma by LC–MS/MS. J Chromatogr Sci. 2015;53:909–914. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bmu143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]