Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;12(4):1099. doi: 10.3390/nu12041099

Table 4.

Risk of CKD incidence according to baseline eGFR-based dietary pattern score.

Women Quartiles of Dietary Pattern Score Continuous Dietary Pattern Score
1 2 3 4 P for Trend OR (95% CI) P
Cases/population 255/11,438 332/11,436 331/11,436 344/11,436 1262/45,746
CKD incidence (%) 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.0 0.001 2.8
Model 1 1.00 0.94 (0.79–1.12) 0.78 (0.66–0.93) 0.67 (0.57–0.80) <0.001 0.80 (0.74–0.86) <0.001
Model 2 1.00 0.94 (0.79–1.11) 0.77 (0.65–0.92) 0.67 (0.56–0.79) <0.001 0.80 (0.74–0.86) <0.001
Model 3 1.00 0.92 (0.77–1.09) 0.74 (0.62–0.89) 0.64 (0.54–0.77) <0.001 0.78 (0.72–0.85) <0.001
Model 4 1.00 0.92 (0.77–1.09) 0.74 (0.62–0.89) 0.64 (0.54–0.77) <0.001 0.78 (0.72–0.85) <0.001
Model 5 1.00 1.04 (0.85–1.27) 0.88 (0.72–1.07)) 0.88 (0.72–1.08) 0.079 0.93 (0.85–1.01) 0.095
Men Quartiles of Dietary Pattern Score Continuous Dietary Pattern Score
1 2 3 4 P for Trend OR (95% CI) P
Cases/population 216/8147 216/8148 195/8147 183/8147 810/32,589
CKD incidence (%) 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.2 0.056 2.5
Model 1 1.00 0.77 (0.62–0.94) 0.57 (0.46–0.70) 0.50 (0.40–0.61) <0.001 0.70 (0.64–0.78) <0.001
Model 2 1.00 0.78 (0.64–0.96) 0.58 (0.47–0.71) 0.51 (0.41–0.63) <0.001 0.71 (0.64–0.79) <0.001
Model 3 1.00 0.80 (0.65–0.98) 0.60 (0.49–0.75) 0.55 (0.44–0.69) <0.001 0.73 (0.66–0.82) <0.001
Model 4 1.00 0.80 (0.65–0.98) 0.60 (0.49–0.75) 0.54 (0.43–0.68) <0.001 0.73 (0.66–0.82) <0.001
Model 5 1.00 0.90 (0.71–1.14) 0.76 (0.59–0.97) 0.95 (0.73–1.23) 0.372 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.578

Model 1. Adjusted for age and BSA; Model 2. Model 1 plus BMI, waist circumference, cholesterol, triglycerides, diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease; Model 3. Model 2 plus physical activity, smoker, and total energy intake; Model 4. Model 3 plus education and income; Model 5. Model 4 plus baseline eGFR.