Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2020 May 7;11:565. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00565

Ethnobotany and Antimicrobial Peptides From Plants of the Solanaceae Family: An Update and Future Prospects

Mohasana Afroz 1, Sanzida Akter 1, Asif Ahmed 2, Razina Rouf 3, Jamil A Shilpi 1, Evelin Tiralongo 4, Satyajit D Sarker 5, Ulf Göransson 6,7, Shaikh Jamal Uddin 1,*
PMCID: PMC7232569  PMID: 32477108

Abstract

The Solanaceae is an important plant family that has been playing an essential role in traditional medicine and human nutrition. Members of the Solanaceae are rich in bioactive metabolites and have been used by different tribes around the world for ages. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from plants have drawn great interest in recent years and raised new hope for developing new antimicrobial agents for meeting the challenges of antibiotic resistance. This review aims to summarize the reported AMPs from plants of the Solanaceae with possible molecular mechanisms of action as well as to correlate their traditional uses with reported antimicrobial actions of the peptides. A systematic literature study was conducted using different databases until August 2019 based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to literature, a variety of AMPs including defensins, protease inhibitor, lectins, thionin-like peptides, vicilin-like peptides, and snaking were isolated from plants of the Solanaceae and were involved in their defense mechanism. These peptides exhibited significant antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity against organisms for both plant and human host. Brugmansia, Capsicum, Datura, Nicotiana, Salpichora, Solanum, Petunia, and Withania are the most commonly studied genera for AMPs. Among these genera, Capsicum and the Solanum ranked top according to the total number of studies (35%–38% studies) for different AMPs. The mechanisms of action of the reported AMPs from Solanaceae was not any new rather similar to other reported AMPs including alteration of membrane potential and permeability, membrane pore formation, and cell aggregation. Whereas, induction of cell membrane permiabilization, inhibition of germination and alteration of hyphal growth were reported as mechanisms of antifungal activity. Plants of the Solanaceae have been used traditionally as antimicrobial, insecticidal, and antiinfectious agents, and as poisons. The reported AMPs from the Solanaceae are the products of chemical shields to protect plants from microorganisms and pests which unfold an obvious link with their traditional medicinal use. In summary, it is evident that AMPs from this family possess considerable antimicrobial activity against a wide range of bacterial and fungal pathogens and can be regarded as a potential source for lead molecules to develop new antimicrobial agents.

Keywords: antimicrobial peptides, Solanaceae, ethnobotany, antibiotic resistance, traditional medicine

Introduction

Misuse or overuse of antibiotics is now becoming the major contributing factor for the ever-increasing antimicrobial resistance (Chandra et al., 2017). Discovery of new effective antimicrobial agents has become a dire need to combat antibiotic resistance which is posing as one of the biggest threat to global health. Since ancient time, natural products have been playing an essential role around the world to treat human diseases as well as a potential source of new therapeutic agents because of their unique and immense chemical diversity (Amedeo Amedei and Niccolai., 2014). Ethnopharmacology, a multidisciplinary study of indigenous remedies, has a great significance on discovery of new drug from natural sources (Holmstedt and Bruhn, 1983).

It is well known that plants can develop different constitutive and inducible mechanisms for the protection from pathogenic infection via morphological barriers, secondary metabolites or antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (Benko-Iseppon et al., 2010). AMPs belong to a wide range of protein family that act as a part of innate immune system or barrier defense of all higher living organisms (Broekaert et al., 1997; Hancock, 2001; Diamond et al., 2009). In recent years, AMPs are getting interest as a surrogate of conventional antibiotics because of their significant activity against multidrug resistant organisms by their direct action on microorganisms or stimulating immune responses (Marshall and Arenas, 2003; Pushpanathan et al., 2013; Mahlapuu et al., 2016). Natural AMPs are reported to possess low to no toxicity in humans and are stable in various conditions because of their unique features including disulfide bonds, overall charges, and especial structural conformation (Barbosa Pelegrini et al., 2011; Bondaryk et al., 2017). Exceptional features of AMPs make them potential candidate to develop new antimicrobial agents. About 1,500 AMPs have been identified from natural sources and a number of these are presently under clinical or preclinical trials (e.g. kalata B1 and B2, pexiganan, omiganan, novexatin, thionins, and thioneinetc) (Salas et al., 2015; Molchanova et al., 2017; Gründemann et al., 2019). Plants are a promising source of AMPs and a number of these peptides have been identified from different parts of plant (leaves, roots, seeds, flowers, and stems) that demonstrated significant activity against both human pathogen or phytopathogens (Montesinos, 2007; Benko-Iseppon et al., 2010; Nawrot et al., 2014). Being discovered from plant, they might have possible link with their ethno-medicinal uses against infection or other ailment.

The Solanaceae is an important family both for economic plants and medicinal plants. Potato, tomato, eggplant, and peppers are some of the most important cash crops that belong to the family of Solanaceae (Ghatak et al., 2017). On the other hand Atropa, Hyoscymus, Withania, Capsicum, and Nicotiana are just some of the most important Solanaceae plants that dictated early stages of medicinal plant based drug discovery and still considered important in herbal practice (Chowanski et al., 2016). The Solanaceae family consists of about 2,700 species distributed in 98 genera (Olmstead and Bohs, 2006). The Solanaceae is a family of flowering plants that ranges from annual and perennial herbs to vines, shrubs, and trees with their distribution in (Nath et al., 2017) almost all continents except Antarctica (Yadav et al., 2016). The Solanaceae are rich in alkaloids some of which finds their use in different traditional medicinal systems including Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Siddha, Unani, and homeopathy (Shah et al., 2013; Chowanski et al., 2016) especially for their use as antimicrobial, insecticidal, antiinfectious agents, and as poisons (Niño et al., 2006; Shah et al., 2013; Chowanski et al., 2016; Tamokou et al., 2017). Bioactive secondary metabolites reported from the members of the Solanaceae include AMPs, alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, lactones, lignans, steroids, simple phenols, sugars, and terpenoids (Ghatak et al., 2017). AMPs of plant origins act as chemical shields to protect plants from organisms and pests that directs to an interesting prospect of AMPs for possible use as promising molecules in antiinfective therapy (Campos et al., 2018). Literature study showed that a number of bioactive AMPs have been reported from different plant parts of the Solanaceae which confirmed the presence of such molecule in this family (Segura et al., 1999; Ryan and Pearce, 2003; Poth et al., 2012; Meneguetti et al., 2017; Kaewklom et al., 2018). However, there is no focused review of AMPs from plants of the Solanaceae to-date, despite their potential as natural antibiotics or antimicrobial agents. The aim of this review is to summarize the reported AMPs from plants of Solanaceae and to draw a possible molecular mechanism of action to further correlate the traditional uses of these plants with their reported AMPs.

Search Strategy and Data Extraction

In this review, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science databases with the term “Solanaceae” along with “peptide,” “protein,” “AMP,” “antimicrobial,” “antifungal,” “antibacterial,” and “antiviral.” We have considered the reports that were only in English because of language barrier, time efficiency and nonfeasible costs of translation. Criteria for inclusion of investigation in this review: (a) peptides isolated from the plants of the Solanaceae, (b) studies those include the antimicrobial effects of peptide or peptide extract from the Solanaceae, (c) studies with peptide concentrations or doses employed, (d) studies of isolated peptides mass and sequence, (e) studies with mechanisms of action associated with their isolated peptides or peptide rich extracts. For the data extraction, all the retrieved articles were assessed according to surname of first author, publication year, the Solanaceae plants, peptides isolated and their mass, sequences, antimicrobial activity, concentrations used, and molecular mechanism involved. From the literature search, it was found that among all the genera of the Solanaceae, Capsicum and Solanum genera are more abundant with AMPs (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Reported antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from different genus of Solanaceae family.

AMPs From Plants of the Solanaceae Family

AMPs from plants are considered as barrier defensive chemicals that have protective response to predators like bacteria, fungi, nematodes, insects, and pests (Nawrot et al., 2014). Based on features, AMPs are grouped into different classes such as type of charge, disulfide bonds present, cyclic structure and the mechanism of action. Cyclotide, defensins, hevein-like proteins, knotin-type proteins, lipid transfer proteins, protease inhibitor, snakins, and thionins were the common classes of AMPs reported so far (Kim et al., 2009; Campos et al., 2018). Among these peptides defensins, protease inhibitor, lectins, thionin-like peptide, vicilin-like peptide, snaking, and some other AMPs were isolated and identified from Solanaceae. Isolated peptides and peptide rich extracts of plants from the Solanaceae exerted antimicrobial activity against various strains of bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the antimicrobial activity of peptide rich extract and isolated peptides from Solanaceae.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial activity of peptide rich plants extract from Solanaceae family.

Genus Plant name Protein/Peptide (Class/Name) Mass (kDa) Sequence Activity MIC/MBC/IC50 Microorganism Mechanism of action Ref.
Capsicum Capsicum annuum L. Peptide rich extracts 5–12 NA Antifungal 50 μg/ml C. gloeosporioides Inhibits the growth and hyphae formation (Maracahipes et al., 2019)
CWE1 peptide- extracts (leaf) 10 NA Antibacterial 10 µg/ml
20 µg/ml
17.4 μg/ml		 R. solanacearum, C. michiganensis E. carotovora ssp NA (Games et al., 2013)
Antifungal NA A. solani
Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum (Willd.) Eshbaugh Trypsin inhibitors rich leaf extract 10–14 Cb1=
GFPFLLNGPDQDQGDFIMFG
Cb-1′= GFKGEQGVPQEMQNEQATIP		 Antiviral 1 μg/ml Pepper yellow Inhibits the activity of pathogen-derived proteinase by binding to and, thus, blocking its active site, suppressing enzymatic activity (Moulin et al., 2014)
Capsicum frutescens L. Antimicrobial peptide rich leaf and fruit extract NA NA Antibacterial 250 mg/ml E coli
S. aureus
K. pneumonia 		NA (Dev and Venu, 2016)
Antifungal 5 mg/ml Alternaria, Colletotrichum Fusarium
Datura Datura stramonium L. 9–45 NA Antibacterial NA E. coli
K. pneumoniae 		Binds to GlcNAc (N-acetyl glucosamine) oligomers which is responsible for the bacterial recognition. (Muhammad et al., 2019)
Solanum
.		 Solanum marginatum L. Protein rich extract (leaves) 18–112 NA Antibacterial 0.1–10 µg/ml E. coli
S. aureus,
P. aeruginosa
S. choleraesuis 		NA (Guzmán-Ceferino et al., 2019)
Solanum stramonifolium Jacq. Protease inhibitors rich extracts (seed) 10– 21.5 NA Antibacterial 100 µg/disc S. aureus
B. licheniformis
B. subtilis
X. sp.
P. aeruginosa
S. typhi 		NA (Sarnthima and Khammuang, 2012)
Open in a new tab

E. coli, Escherichia coli; K. pneumonia, Klebsiella pneumonia; S. aureus, Stapyllococcus aureus; B. licheniformis, Bacillus licheniformis; B. subtilis, Bacillus subtilis; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; S. typhi, Salmonella typhi; S. choleraesuis, Salmonella choleraesuis; C. gloeosporioides, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; R. solanacearum, Ralstonia solanacearum; C. michiganensis, Clavibacter michiganensis; E. carotovora ssp, Erwinia. carotovora ssp; A. solani, Alternaria solani; A. Colletotrichum, Alternaria Colletotrichum.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial activity of isolated peptides from plants of Solanaceae family.

Genus Plant name Protein/Peptide (Class/Name) Mass (kDa) Sequence Activity MIC/MBC/IC50 Microorganism Mechanism of action Ref.
Brugmansia Brugmansia x candida Pers. Defensin 5.29 FSGGDCRGLRRRCFCTR-NH2 Antibacterial 15.70 μM E. coli
V. cholerae
S. sonnei
S. typhimurium
E. faecalis
B. cereus
S. epidermidis 		Affects cell membrane potential and permeability, and causes cell membrane disruption (Kaewklom et al., 2018)
Capsicum Capsicum annuum L. Trypsin inhibitor ~ 20 NA Antifungal 64 μg/ml F. solani
C. gloeosporioides C. lindemuthianum F. oxysporum 		Causes hyphal morph–ological alterations, membrane permeabili- -zation via induces reactive oxygen species. (Silva et al., 2017)
Thionin-like peptide 5 NA Antifungal 10 μg/ml, 20 μg/ml
40 μg/ml		 Candida species Causes plasma membrane permeabilization in all yeasts tested and induces oxidative stresses only in Candida tropicalis (Taveira et al., 2016)
Thionin-like peptides 7–10 NA Antibacterial 100 µg/ml P. aeruginosa
E. coli 		Induces change in the membranes of all strains, leading to their permeabilization (Taveira et al., 2014)
Antifungal 100
µg/ml		 S. cerevisiae
C. albicans
C. tropicalis
Antimicrobial CaAMP1 protein 21.152 NA Antibacterial 10 µg/ml,
>100 µg/ml		 B. subtilis
M. luteus 		NA (Lee et al., 2008)
Antifungal 30 µg/ml,
20 µg/ml,
5 µg/ml,
10 µg/ml,
5 µg/ml,
>100 µg/ml,
50 µg/ml,
50 µg/ml		 C. albicans
B. cinerea
C. cucumerinum
P. capsici
S. cerevisiae,
R. solani
A. brassicicola
F. oxysporum 		Inhibition of fungal spore germination and hyphae growth
Capsicum baccatum L. Vicilin-like peptides 4–8 NA Antifungal 200 µg/ml S. cerevisiae
C. albicans
C. tropicalis
K. marxiannus 		Promotes morpholo-logical changes in all strains, including pseudohyphae formation (Bard et al., 2014)
Capsicum chinense Jacq. Trypsin -chymotrypsin protease inhibitor 5.0–14 PEF2-A= QICTNCCAGRKGCNYYSAD
PEF2-B= GICTNCCAGRKGCNYFSAD		 Antifungal 100 µg/ml C. albicans,
P. membranifaciens
S. cerevisiae
C. tropicalis
K. marxiannus 		Exhibits cellular agglomeration and formation of pseudohyphae (Dias et al., 2013)
DING Peptide 7.57
And
39		 ~ 7.57 kDa =lengths of 32 (AGTNAVDLSVDQLCGVTSGRITTWNQLPATGR), 21 (ITYMSPDYAAPTLAGLDDATK), and 12 (RSASGTTELFTR)
~ 39 kDa= ITYMSPDYAAPTLAGLDDATK		 Antifungal 3.75
µg/ml		 S. cerevisiae NA (Brito-Argáez et al., 2016)
Datura Datura innoxia Mill. Chito-specific Lectin 9 NA Antibacterial 0.325 mg/ml
0.25 mg/ml
0.15 mg/ml
0.5 mg/ml		 S. aureus
B. cereus
E. faecalis
E. coli
S. typhimurium
P. aeruginosa 		NA (Singh and Suresh, 2016)
Antifungal NA C. albicans
T. viride
G. saubinetii
F. oxysporum
C. sp
S. cerevisiae
F. moniliforme
A. sfalvus
Nicotiana Nicotiana alata Link & Otto. Defensin
(class I NaD1 and II NaD2)		 11.72 MARSLCFMAF AILAMMLFVA YEVQARECKT ESNTFPGICI TKPPCRKACI SEKFTDGHCS KILRRCLCTK PCVFDEKMTK TGAEILAEEA KTLAAALLEE EIMDN Antifungal NaD1= 1μM, 0.5 μM, 0.75 μM, 1 μM, 0.8 μM, 2.5 μM, 2 μM
NaD2=
5 μM, 2μM, >10 μM, 7 μM, 5 μM,
4 μM, 5 μM		 F. oxysporum
F. graminearum
V. dahlia
T. basicola
A. nidulans
P. coronate
P. sorghi 		Inhibits germination, stunting of germ tubes and a granular appearance of the cytoplasm in spores, reduces pustule frequency and increased photosynthetic area (Dracatos et al., 2014)
Defensin 5–7 Antifungal 10 µg/ml
2 µg/ml		 B. cinerea
F. oxysporum 		Inhibits the hyphal growth (Lay et al., 2003)
Nicotiana tabacum L. CBP20 Peptide 20 (CBP-PEP1):
Y(A/G)SPSQGXQSQ(R)SGGGGGGGGGGGGGAGN
(CBP-PEP2):
TAFYGPVGP(P/R)GRDSXGK(G)		 Antifungal 6.7 µg/ml F. solani
T. viride
A. radicina 		Causes lysis of the germ tubes (Ponstein et al., 1994)
Petunia Petunia violacea var. hybrida Hook. (syn. Petunia hybrida Vilm.) Defensin 5 -7 NA Antifungal 10 µg/ml
2 µg/ml		 B. cinerea
F. oxysporum 		Inhibits the hyphal growth (Lay et al., 2003)
Solanum Solanum lycopersicum L. Defensin 5.3–8.7 NA Antifungal 2.5 µg/ml B. cinerea Inhibits hyphal tip growth (Stotz et al., 2009)
Snakin-2 peptide 7.05 NA Antibacterial 4.25 µM
1.06 µM
.26 µM
1.06 µM		 E. coli,
A. tumefaciens
M. luteus
S. cohnii 		Perforates the biomembranes of bacteria and fungi (Herbel et al., 2015)
Antifungal 8.49 µM
4.25 µM		 P. pastoris,
F. solani
Solanum tuberosum L. cv Jaerla Snakin-2 peptide 7.02 NA Antibacterial 1 µM
30 µM
8 µM		 C. michiganensis
R. solanacearum
R. meliloti 		Induces rapid aggregation of both gm(+) and gm (−) bacteria (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002)
Antifungal 2 µM
3 µM
2 µM
10 µM
20 µM
10 µM
10 µM
10 µM
20 µM		 B. cinerea
F. solani
F. culmorum
F. oxysporum
A. flavus
C. graminicola
P. cucumerina
C. lagenarium
B. maydis 		NA
Solanum aethiopicum L. (syn. Solanum integrifolium Poir.) Chitin-binding lectin 16.8 MKTIQGQSATTALTMEVARVQA Antifungal 1 mg/ml
5 mg/ml		 R. solani
C. gloeosporioides 		Inhibits the rate of the growth of fungal hyphae (Chen et al., 2018)
Insecticidal 1 μg/ml sf21 insect cells Reduces the mitochondrial membrane potential in insect cells
Solanum tuberosum L. Serine protease inhibitor 13.5 NH2-LPSDATLVLDQTGKELDARL Antifungal 6.25 µg/ml
6.25 µg/ml
6.25 µg/ml
>100 µg/ml
>100 µg/ml
>100 µg/ml		 S. cerevisiae
T. beigelii
C. albicans
C. gloeosporioides C. coccodes
D. bryoniae 		NA (Park et al., 2005)
Trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor 5.6 NH2-DICTCCAGTKGCNTTSANGAFICEGQSDPKKPKACPLNCDPHIAYA Antibacterial 50 µM C. michiganense Inhibits the growth of both types of microorganism. (Kim et al., 2005)
Antifungal 100 µM C. albicans
R. solani
Apoplastic hydrophobic peptides (AHPs) 12–78 NA Antifungal 25 µM P. infestans Inhibits the germination of hyphae and accelerates the destruction of fungal spores (Fernández et al., 2012)
Potide-G 5.57 NA Antiviral 90 µM P. Virus NA (Tripathi et al., 2006)
Salpichroa Salpichroa origanifolia (Lam.) Baill. Aspartic protease inhibitor 32 NA Antifungal 1.2 µM F. solani Causes permeabilization of cell membranes (Díaz et al., 2018)
Antibacterial 1.9 µM
2.5 µM		 E. coli
S. aureus
Withania Withania somnifera L. Dunal. Lectin-like peptide 30 NA Antifungal 7 μg/ml
9 μg/ml
11 μg/ml		 T. vesiculosum
F. moniliforme
M. phaseolina
R. solani 		Inhibits the hyphal extension (Ghosh, 2009)
Glycoprotein (WSG) 28 NA Antibacterial 20 µg/ml C. michiganensis Inhibits bacterial growth (Girish et al., 2006)
Antifungal A. flavus
F. oxysporum,
F. verticilloides 		Exerts a fungistastic effect by inhibiting spore germination and hyphal growth
Open in a new tab

A. brassicicola, Alternaria brassicicola; A. tumefaciens, Agrobacteriumtumefaciens; A. radicina, Alternaria radicina; A. flavus, Aspergillus flavus; B. cinereal, Botrytis cinerea; B. subtilis, Bacillus subtilis; B. graminis, Blumeria graminis; B. cinerea, Botrytis cinerea; B. cereus, Bacillus cereus; B. cereus, Bacillus cereus; C. sp, Cephalosporium sp; C. cucumerinum, Cladosporiumcucumerinum; C. albicans, Candida albicans; C. tropicalis, Candida tropicalis; C.michiganensis, Clvibacter michiganensis; C. gloeosporioides, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; C. occodes, Colletotrichum coccodes; C. michiganense, Clavibacter michiganense; C. lindemuthianum, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum; C. tropicalis, Candida tropicalis; D. bryoniae, Didymella bryoniae; E. faecalis, Enterococcus faecalis; E. coli, Escherichia coli; F. solani, Fusarium solani; F. graminearum, Fusariumgraminearum; F.moniliforme, Fusariummoniliforme; F. oxysporum, Fusariumoxysporum; F. verticilloides, Fusariumverticilloides; G. saubinetii, Gibberella saubinetii; K. marxiannus, Kluyveromyces marxiannus; M. phaseolina, Macrophomia phaseolina; M. luteus, Micrococcus luteus; P. infestans, Phytophthora infestans; P. Virus, Potato Virus; P. graminis, Puccinia graminis; P. capsica, Phytophthora capsici; P. triticina, Puccinia triticina; P. hordei, Puccinia hordei; P. striiformis, Puccinia striiformis; P. coronate, Puccinia coronate; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; P. nodorum, Phaeosphaeria nodorum; R. solani, Rhizoctonia solani; R.meliloti, Rhizobiummeliloti; S. sonnei, Shigella sonnei; S. typhimurium, Salmonella typhimurium; S. epidermidis, Staphylococcus epidermidis; S. cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; S. cohnii, Staphylococcus cohnii; T. vesiculosum, Trichosporium vesiculosum; T. viride, Trichoderma viride; T. controversa, Tilletia controversa; T. beigelii, Trichosporon beigelii; U. tritici, Ustilago tritici; V. cholera, Vibrio cholera; NA, Not available.

Several genera of the Solanaceae, such as Capsicum, Datura, and Solanum, have been reported to possess AMPs and peptide rich extract from seeds, leaf or fruit, tuber of these species. These peptides have been reported to have significant antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral activities against both phytopathogenic and human pathogenic strain (Table 1). The reported AMP rich extracts belong to different categories include acidic, basic, protease inhibitor, and trypsin inhibitors (Sarnthima and Khammuang, 2012; Moulin et al., 2014; Muhammad et al., 2019). The mechanism of their action was not clear, however, it was reported that antibacterial activity could be due to changes in membrane permeabilization (Muhammad et al., 2019) and antifungal activity could be owing to inhibition of fungal growth and hyphae formation (Maracahipes et al., 2019). The Datura is a common genus of the Solanaceae and mostly found in Asian continent with a number of ethnomedicinal uses including against microbial infections (Table 3). Recently, Muhammad et al. (2019) reported that the seed extract of Datura stramonium L. is rich in acidic and basic peptides (9–45 kDa) and exhibited antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia (Eftekhar et al., 2005; Muhammad et al., 2019). Antibacterial activity of peptide rich extract from the leaves of Solanum stramonifolium Jacq. and seeds of Solanum marginatum L.f. showed antibacterial activity against different human pathogenic bacteria with the MIC values 0.1–100 µg/ml (Sarnthima and Khammuang, 2012; Guzmán-Ceferino et al., 2019). Peptide rich leaf and seed extracts of different species of the Capsicum, e.g., Capsicum annuum L. and Capsicum frutescens L., exhibited significant antibacterial and antifungal effect via inhibiting their growth and hyphae formation (Games et al., 2013; Dev and Venu, 2016; Maracahipes et al., 2019). A study by Moulin et al. (2014) showed that trypsin inhibitors (10–14 kDa) rich leaf extract of Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum (Willd.) Eshbaugh exerted antiviral activity (MIC 1–25 µg/ml) against PepYMV (Pepper yellow mosaic virus) by blocking the active site of pathogen-derived proteinase as well as reduced enzymatic activity (Moulin et al., 2014). The genera Capsicum, Datura, and Solanum of the Solanaceae are popular in ethnobotany and have been reported to have different traditional uses against different diseases including infections (Table 3) which might be linked to the AMPs found in these plants.

Table 3.

Traditional uses of plants from Solanaceae family.

Plant name Traditional uses References
Brugmansia x candida Pers. Used as analgesic against traumatic or rheumatic pains as well as for the treatment of dermatitis, orchitis, arthritis, headaches, infections, and as an antiinflammatory. (Feo, 2004)
Capsicum annuum L. Used to prevent cold, sinus infection, sorethroat and improve digestion, blood circulation, cancer, asthma, and cough, norexia, haemor-rhoids, liver congestion, and varicose veins. (Duke, 1993; Khare, 2004)
Capsicum baccatum L. Antirheumatic, antiseptic, diaphoretic, digestive, irritant, rubefacient, sialagogue and tonic (Bown, 1995; Chevallier, 1996)
Capsicum chinense Jacq Asthma, gastro-intestinal abnormalities, toothache and muscle pain, removal of puss from boils, arthritis (Roy, 2016)
Capsicum frutescens L. Antihaemorrhoidal, antirheumatic, antiseptic, carminative, diaphoretic, digestive, sialagogue and stomachic, antibiotic properties. (Chiej, 1984; Simpson and Conner-Ogorzaly, 1986; Chevallier, 1996)
Datura stramonium L. Used to treat epilepsy burns and rheumatism, anthelmintic, and antiinflammatory, worm infestation, toothache, and fever, insect repellant, which protects neighboring plants from insects. (Guarrera, 1999; Das et al., 2012; Soni et al., 2012)
Datura innoxia Mill. Used in the treatment of insanity, fevers with catarrh, diarrhea, and skin diseases. (Chopra and Chopra, 1969; Emboden, 1972)
Nicotiana alata Link & Otto. Used as antiseptic, insecticide, antispasmodic, relieve pain, and swelling associated with rheumatic conditions and vermifuge. (Binorkar and Jani, 2012)
Solanum lycopersicum L. First aid treatment for burns, scalds and sunburn, treatment of toothache (Duke, 2008)
Solanum tuberosum L. Folk remedy for burns, corns, cough, cystitis, fistula, prostatitis, scurvy, spasms, tumors, and warts (Duke and Wain, 1981; Graham et al., 2000)
Salpichroa origanifolia (Lam.) Baill. Used as antiinflammatory, diuretic, antimicrobial and narcotic effect (Parisi et al., 2018)
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Aphrodisiac, sedative, chronic fatigue, weakness, dehydration, weakness of bones and loose teeth, thirst, impotence, premature aging, emaciation, debility and muscles tension, antihelmantic. (Mir et al., 2012)
Open in a new tab

Plant defensins are cysteine rich small (45 to 54 amino acids) basic peptides that can form four structure-stabilizing disulfide bridges (Benko-Iseppon et al., 2010). They have a widespread distribution and are likely to be present in the Solanaceae. Kaewklom et al. (2018) reported a new plant defensin (5.29 kDa) with interesting structural and biological features from Brugmansia x candida Pers. that showed antibacterial activity (MIC of 15.7 μM) against Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Shigella sonnei, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Vibrio cholerae, by affecting membrane permeability, membrane potential, and membrane disruption (Kaewklom et al., 2018). Different types of defensin were found in Nicotiana alata Link & Otto that inhibit germination and the hyphal growth of fungus (Lay et al., 2003; Dracatos et al., 2014) (Figure 2). Antifungal defensins were also found from Solanum lycopersicum L. and Petunia violacea var. hybrida Hook. (syn. Petunia hybrida Vilm.) with MICs of 2.5–11 µg/ml against Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum through inhibition of hyphal tip growth (Stotz et al., 2009). Interestingly, B. x candida, N. alata, S. lycopersicum, and P. hybrida have long been used traditionally for treating various diseases which is justified by the defensin content of these plant species of Solanaceae.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

3D structures of different antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) of the Solanaceae family. “PEPFOLD 3.5 De Novo Peptide Structure Prediction” program from “RPBS Web Portal” (https://mobyle.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/) was used to draw the 3D structures. The program was executed with highest number of simulations (200) and 3D models were sorted by sOPEP. The best models were downloaded and opened with PyMOL(TM) 2.3.2 - Incentive Product, Copyright (C) Schrodinger, LLC and the structures were captured ensuring publication quality. (A) Defensin from Brugmansia x candida (FSGGDCRGLRRRCFCTR-NH2); (B) Trypsin inhibitor from Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum (Cb1=GFPFLLNGPDQDQGDFIMFG); (C) Trypsin inhibitor from Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum (Cb1) (GFKGEQGVPQEMQNEQATIP); (D) Trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor from Capsicum chinense (PEF2-A) (QICTNCCAGRKGCNYYSAD); (E) Trypsin -chymotrypsin protease inhibitor from Capsicum chinense (PEF2-B) (GICTNCCAGRKGCNYFSAD); (F) DING peptide from Capsicum chinense (AGTNAVDLSVDQLCGVTSGRITTWNQLPATGR)]; (G) DING peptide from Capsicum chinense (RSASGTTELFTR)]; (H) DING peptide from Capsicum chinense (ITYMSPDYAAPTLAGLDDATK); (I) Defensin (NaD1 and NaD2) from Nicotiana alata (MARSLCFMAFAILAMMLFVAYEVQARECKTESNTFPGICITKPPCRKACISEKFT DGHCSKILRRCLCTKPCVFDEKMTKTGAEILAEEAKTLAAALLEEEIMDN); (J) Serine protease inhibitor from Solanum tuberosum (NH2-LPSDATLVLDQTGKELDARL); (K) Trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor from Solanum tuberosum (NH2-DICTCCAGTKGCNTTSANGAFICEGQSDPKKPKACPLNCDPHIAYA); (L) Chitin-binding lectin from Solanum integrifolium (MKTIQGQSATTALTMEVARVQA).

Proteinase inhibitors are another class of plant peptides that reported to possesses antibacterial and antifungal activity (Hancock and Lehrer, 1998; Epand and Vogel, 1999; Kim et al., 2009). Plant protease inhibitors are commonly found in tubers and seeds and known to inhibit aspartic, cysteine, and serine proteinases. Increased levels of trypsin and chymotrypsin inhibitors in plants have a strong correlation with their resistance to the pathogen (Kim et al., 2009). Solanum tuberosum L. is a common species of the Solanaceae and different protease inhibitor-like AMPs have been reported from this species. Park et al. (2005) and Kim et al. (2005) reported trypsin-chymotrypsin and serine protease inhibitor-like peptides from Solanum tuberosum and both demonstrated potential antifungal activity with MICs 1–25 µg/ml (Kim et al., 2005; Park et al., 2005). Among these peptides, iskunitz-type serine protease inhibitor was reported to be active against Candida albicans, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Colletotrichum coccodes, Didymella bryoniae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Trichosporon beigelii fungal infections whereas the other one trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor was active against C. albicans and Rhizoctonia solani. The genus Capsicum produces trypsin and trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor like peptides with antifungal activity (MIC 50-250 µg/ml), particularly from C. annuum and C. chinense Jacq. (Dias et al., 2013; Silva et al., 2017). The antifungal activity of these AMPs exhibited either through cellular agglomeration and formation of pseudohyphae or via hyphal morphological alterations as well as membrane permeabilization by inducing ROS (Dias et al., 2013; Silva et al., 2017). Salpichroa origanifolia is another plant of the Solanaceae from which another aspartic protease inhibitor AMP has been reported that possesses both antifungal (0.3–3.75 µM) and antibacterial (0.32.5 µM) activity against Fusarium solani, E. coli, and Staphylococcus aureus via membrane permeabilization (Díaz et al., 2018). Interestingly, Capsicum, Salpichroa, and Solanum are well known genera of the Solanaceae and have been used in traditional medicine against a number of infectious diseases (Table 3).

Lectins are carbohydrate binding proteins, widely distributed in plants, animals, or microorganisms and have specificity for cell surface sugar moieties of glycoconjugates residues (Brooks and Leathem, 1998). Plant lectins have been reported to a wide variety of flowering plant species (Allen and Brilliantine, 1969). The Solanaceae is a family of flowering plants and a number of lectins have been reported from different plants from this family (Table 2). Antimicrobial action of lectins has long been known and the reported lectins from the Solanaceae also possess antibacterial and antifungal activity. A chito-specific lectin (9 kDa) was purified and characterized from Datura innoxia Mill. seeds that was shown to have antibacterial and antifungal activity at different concentrations against various strains of bacteria (MICs 0.25–0.5 mg/ml) and fungi (MIC 0.15 mg/ml) (Singh and Suresh, 2016). Lectin-like protein (30 kDa) was isolated from Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal that showed antimicrobial effect (MIC 7-11 μg/ml) (Girish et al., 2006; Ghosh, 2009). Recently, Chen et al. (2018), reported a chitin-specific lectin from Solanum aethiopicum L. (syn. Solanum integrifolium) with antifungal (MIC 1–5 mg/ml) and insecticidal activities (MIC 1 μg/ml) (Chen et al., 2018). Another monomeric glycoprotein (28 kDa) was reported from W. somnifera root tubers which showed significant antimicrobial activity against phytopathogns (both fungi and bacteria) (Girish et al., 2006). The antifungal activity of reported lectins were due to the inhibition of growth and extension of fungal hypha (Girish et al., 2006; Ghosh, 2009; Chen et al., 2018). These plants have been reported to have traditional uses against different infections (Table 3) which might have correlation with the reported AMPs from these plants.

Thionins are another AMPs that are structurally cystine-rich, disulfide bond containing cationic small peptides (∼5 kDa) found in plant and act as a part of plant defense mechanisms (Westermann and Craik, 2010). It is reported that thionins possess cidal effect to a broad range of bacteria and mammalian cells through loss of membrane integrity and induces membrane permeabilization mechanisms (Montville and Kaiser, 1993; Westermann and Craik, 2010). Literature study demonstrated that C. annuum was a potential plant with thionins that showed antimicrobial activity against a broad ranges of human pathogens both bacteria (MIC 100–300 mg/ml) and fungi (MIC 10–40 µg/ml). The possible mechanism of action includes induced membrane permiabilization or changes in membrane integrity as well as induced oxidative stress (Taveira et al., 2014; Taveira et al., 2016). Interestingly, the Capsicum is one of the potential genera of the Solanaceae that has been used traditionally against a number of infectious diseases (Table 3).

Vicilins are 7S globulin class plant seed storage proteins with no disulfide bond and structurally contain three similar subunits of 40–70 kDa (Bard et al., 2014). These proteins possess different functions and known as plant defense proteins (Jain et al., 2016). Vicilin-like peptides have similar homology with vicilin and exhibited antimicrobial and antifungal activity (Ribeiro et al., 2007; Jain et al., 2016). Capsicum baccatum L. has been reported to produce vicilin-like peptides that showed promising antifungal activity (MIC 100–200 µg/ml) (Bard et al., 2014). The possible mechanism of their antifungal activity was not clear but highlighted that the antifungal action was due to promotion of cellular morphological changes including pseudohyphae formation through binding of chitin containing components of fungal cell wall (Bard et al., 2014).

Snakins are plant AMPs that have twelve conserved cysteine residues and play different roles in plant with the responses of both biotic and abiotic stress. These plant peptides have been reported to offer a number of activities including significant antibacterial activity and therefore have potential therapeutic and agricultural applications (Oliveira-Lima et al., 2017). The Solanum genus is rich in snakin-2 peptide that possesses significant antimicrobial activity. Herbel et al. (2015) revealed that recombinant snakin-2 (7.05 kDa) protein in E. coli from Solanum lycopersicum caused perforation of membranes of bacteria and fungi with MIC values 0.26–8.49 µM (Herbel et al., 2015). Another snakin-2 peptide (7.02 kDa) was isolated from potato tuber (S. tuberosum ) that showed promising activity against phytopathogenic bacteria (MICs 1–30 µM) and fungi (MIC 1–20 µM). The mechanism of action of snakins remains unclear, however the antibacterial activity was reported due to the rapid aggregation of bacterial cells (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002).

In addition to these common plant AMPs, some other peptides or polypeptides with significant antimicrobial activity have also been reported from plants of the Solanaceae (Table 2). Brito-Argáez et al. (2016) reported a ~7.57 kDa peptide with interesting antifungal (MIC 3–15 µg/ml) and antiproliferative activity from C. chinense seeds, which were further confirmed a proteolytic product belonging to a ~ 39 kDa DING protein (Brito-Argáez et al., 2016). DING protein is a class of ubiquitous protein (40 kDa) that possesses phosphatase and inhibition of carcinogenic cell growth activity (Bookland et al., 2012) (Figure 2). A study conducted by Ponstein et al. (1994) demonstrated the purification of a new pathogen and wound-inducible polypeptide (CBP20) from tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum) with antifungal activity (Ponstein et al., 1994) (Figure 2). A number of apoplastic hydrophobic proteins (AHPs) with antifungal activity identified after differentially expressed by Phytophthora infestans infection to potato tuber (S. tuberosum) that help to protect potato against P. infestans infection (Fernández et al., 2012). Inhibition of germination of hyphae and fungal spore was the possible mechanism of AHPs’s antifungal activity (Fernández et al., 2012). In 2006, two antiviral peptides named potide-G and golden peptide were isolated separately from potato (S. tuberosum L.) that showed promising antiviral activity against potato virus YO (PVYO) (Tripathi et al., 2006). Another study with C. annum found a new antimicrobial protein CaAMP1 that exhibited promising activity against both different bacteria (MICs 5–30 µg/ml) and fungi (MICs 5–100 µg/ml). The antifungal activity was due to inhibition of spore germination and hyphae growth (Lee et al., 2008). Some other peptides belonging to different AMPs families such as defensins, thionin, protease inhibitor, hevein-type were also reported from S. tuberosum., C. annuum. and Solanum esculentum L. of the Solanaceae that showed no antibacterial activity (Guevara et al., 2001; Carrillo-Montes et al., 2014; Kovtun et al., 2018). Solanum, Capsicum, Nicotiana, and Withania were the most ethnobotanical genera of the Solanaceae that have different traditional uses against different diseases including antimicrobial activity (Table 3) which could have correlation with these reported plant defensive AMPs.

AMPs have been studied for several decades but understanding of their molecular mechanism is still unclear. However, it is evident that AMPs are plant defense peptides that act against pathogen (both bacteria and fungi) to protect themselves by interacting with their cell wall. AMPs can act through several mechanism depending on peptides structure, amino acid sequence, peptide-lipid ratio as well as properties of the interacting lipid membrane (Galdiero et al., 2013; Bechinger and Gorr, 2017). It is evident that interaction of peptides with cell membrane causes changes in peptide’s conformation and aggregation state that adapted by membrane lipid via alteration of their (lipid) conformation and packing structure (Bechinger and Gorr, 2017). Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria contain negatively charged surfaces on outer membrane (Gram-negative) or cell wall (Gram-positive) and therefore there was no basic mechanistic difference of AMPs acting on them. Furthermore, Gram-positive bacterial cell wall contain pores (40 to 80 nm) and several AMPs easily cross it to interact with target site (Malanovic and Lohner, 2016). Sani and Separovic (2016) proposed a number of membrane models (barrel-stave pore, toroidal pore and carpet model) associated with cationic AMPs-membrane interaction, membrane disruption and membrane permiability (Sani and Separovic, 2016). In case of Gram-negative bacteria, AMPs cross membrane through electrostatic interaction and charge-exchange mechanism with Ca2+ and Mg2+ bound to lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan (Schmidt and Wong, 2013; Anunthawan et al., 2015). The mechanism of antibacterial action of peptides from Solanaceae were due to the induction of membrane pores, alteration of cell membrane potential and permeability as well as cell aggregation which support the reported AMPs mechanism of action. Whereas, antifungal AMPs can specifically target fungi cell wall or cell membrane and ergosterol is the major component in fungal cell membranes which regulates permeability and fluidity (Silva et al., 2014; Rodrigues, 2018). AMPs also exert their antifungal activity by inhibition of β-glucan synthase resulting in destabilized cell wall and cell lysis (Matejuk et al., 2010). The alteration of hyphal growth by AMPs was due to inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis (Theis et al., 2003). Interestingly, reported Solanaceae AMP’s antifungal activity were supported by the molecular mechanism such as induction of cell membrane permiabilization, inhibition of germination, and alteration of hyphal growth.

Conclusion

In this review, we have summarized the reported AMPs from plants of the Solanaceae and pointed out the possible molecular mechanisms to correlate the ethnobotanical uses with their antimicrobial action. These data demonstrated that a variety of AMPs have been isolated with significant antimicrobial activity from plants of the Solanaceae including defensins, protease inhibitor, lectins, thionin-like peptide, vicilin-like peptide, snaking, and others. Capsicum, Solanum, Datura, Nicotiana, Withania, Salpichora, Brugmansia, and Petunia are the most promising genera to produce different AMPs. Alteration of cell membrane potential and permeability as well as membrane pores induction and cell aggregation were the possible antibacterial mechanism of the reported peptides. On the other hand, the antifungal activity was due to induction of cell membrane permeabilization, inhibition of germination and alteration of hyphal growth. However, the mechanisms of action of the AMPs from Solanaceae were not any new pathway rather similar to other generic AMPs. The isolated and identified AMPs from the Solanaceae are a part of its defense mechanism and are therefore have strong correlation with their ethnobotanical virtues including antimicrobial, poisonous, insecticidal, and antiinfectious. The Solanaceae contain a variety of AMPs with promising antimicrobial activity that may be a potential source of lead for antimicrobial drug development. In addition to pharmaceutical uses, AMPs from Solanaceae can also be a good source for development of innovative approaches for plant protection in agriculture. Conferred disease resistance by AMPs might help us surmount losses in yield, quality and safety of agricultural products as well as molecular farming due to their disease resistance properties. Furthermore, new species from Solanaceae could be interesting to be explored for novel AMPs.

Author Contributions

The review was designed by SU and written by SU, MA, SA, AA, and RR. JS, ET, SS, AA, and UG provided valuable guidance, revision, correction, and other insight into the work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

All the authors are thankful to Pharmacy Discipline, Life Science School, Khulna University and Ministry of Education, Bangladesh for their assistance and support.

References

  1. Allen N. K., Brilliantine L. (1969). A Survey of Hemagglutinins in Various Seeds. J. Immunol. 102, 1295–1299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amedei A., Niccolai. E. (2014). “Plant and Marine Sources: Biological activity of natural products and therapeutic use,” in Natural Product Analysis: Instrumentation, Metods and Applicatoins. Eds. Havlicek V., J. Spizekgf (New Jersy, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.), 43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anunthawan T., De La Fuente-Nunez C., Hancock R. E., Klaynongsruang S. (2015). Cationic amphipathic peptides KT2 and RT2 are taken up into bacterial cells and kill planktonic and biofilm bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1848, 1352–1358. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbosa Pelegrini P., Del Sarto R. P., Silva O. N., Franco O. L., Grossi-De-Sa M. F. (2011). Antibacterial peptides from plants: what they are and how they probably work. Biochem. Res. Int. 2011, 250349. 10.1155/2011/250349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bard V. G. C., Nascimento V. V., Oliveira A. E. A., Rodrigues R., Cunha D. M., Dias G. B., et al. (2014). Vicilin-like peptides from Capsicum baccatum L. seeds are α-amylase inhibitors and exhibit antifungal activity against important yeasts in medical mycology. Pept. Sci. 102, 335–343. 10.1002/bip.22504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bechinger B., Gorr S. U. (2017). Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance. J. Dent. Res. 96, 254–260. 10.1177/0022034516679973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benko-Iseppon A. M., Galdino S. L., Calsa T., Jr., Kido E. A., Tossi A., Belarmino L. C., et al. (2010). Overview on plant antimicrobial peptides. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 11, 181–188. 10.2174/138920310791112075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berrocal-Lobo M., Segura A., Moreno M., Lopez G., Garcia-Olmedo F., Molina A. (2002). Snakin-2, an antimicrobial peptide from potato whose gene is locally induced by wounding and responds to pathogen infection. Plant Physiol. 128, 951–961. 10.1104/pp.010685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Binorkar S. V., Jani D. K. (2012). Traditional medicinal usage of tobacco- a review. Spatula D.D. 2, 127–134. 10.5455/spatula.20120423103016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bondaryk M., Staniszewska M., Zielińska P., Urbańczyk-Lipkowska Z. (2017). Natural antimicrobial peptides as inspiration for design of a new generation antifungal compounds. J. Fungi (Basel Switzerland) 3, 46. 10.3390/jof3030046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bookland M. J., Darbinian N., Weaver M., Amini S., Khalili K. (2012). Growth inhibition of malignant glioblastoma by DING protein. J. Neurooncol. 107, 247–256. 10.1007/s11060-011-0743-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bown D. (1995). The Royal Horticultural Society encyclopedia of herbs & their uses (New York: Dorling Kindersley Limited; ). [Google Scholar]
  13. Brito-Argáez L., Tamayo-Sansores J. A., Madera-Piña D., García-Villalobos F. J., Moo-Puc R. E., Kú-González Á., et al. (2016). Biochemical characterization and immunolocalization studies of a Capsicum chinense Jacq. protein fraction containing DING proteins and anti-microbial activity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 109, 502–514. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Broekaert W. F., Cammue B. P., De Bolle M. F., Thevissen K., De Samblanx G. W., Osborn R. W., et al. (1997). Antimicrobial peptides from plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 16, 297–323. 10.1080/07352689709701952 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brooks S. A., Leathem A. J. (1998). Expression of N-acetyl galactosaminylated and sialylated glycans by metastases arising from primary breast cancer. Inva. Metast. 18, 115–121. 10.1159/000024504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Campos M. L., De Souza C. M., De Oliveira K. B. S., Dias S. C., Franco O. L. (2018). The role of antimicrobial peptides in plant immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 4997–5011. 10.1093/jxb/ery294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carrillo-Montes J. P., Arreguín-Espinosa R., Muñoz-Sánchez J. L., Soriano-García M. (2014). Purification and biochemical characterization of a protease inhibitor II family from Jalapeno pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 5, 661. 10.4236/abb.2014.57078 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chandra H., Bishnoi P., Yadav A., Patni B., Mishra A. P., Nautiyal A. R. (2017). Antimicrobial resistance and the alternative resources with special emphasis on plant-based antimicrobials-A Review. Plants (Basel) 6, 16. 10.3390/plants6020016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen C.-S., Chen C.-Y., Ravinath D. M., Bungahot A., Cheng C.-P., You R.-I. (2018). Functional characterization of chitin-binding lectin from Solanum integrifolium containing anti-fungal and insecticidal activities. BMC Plant Biol. 18, 3. 10.1186/s12870-017-1222-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chevallier A. (1996). The encyclopedia of medicinal plants (USA: DK Publisher; ). [Google Scholar]
  21. Chiej R. (1984). The Macdonald encyclopedia of medicinal plants (Macdonald & Co (Britain: Publishers) Ltd; ). [Google Scholar]
  22. Chopra R. N., Chopra R. N. (1969). Supplement to glossary of Indian medicinal plants (New Delhi, India: Council for scientific and industrial research; ). [Google Scholar]
  23. Chowanski S., Adamski Z., Marciniak P., Rosinski G., Buyukguzel E., Buyukguzel K., et al. (2016). A review of bioinsecticidal activity of Solanaceae Alkaloids. Toxins (Basel) 8, 1–28. 10.3390/toxins8030060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Díaz M., Rocha G., Kise F., Rosso A., Guevara M., Parisi M. (2018). Antimicrobial activity of an aspartic protease from Salpichroa origanifolia fruits. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 67, 168–174. 10.1111/lam.13006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Das S., Kumar P., Basu S. (2012). Phytoconstituents and therapeutic potentials of Datura stramonium Linn. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2, 4–7. 10.22270/jddt.v2i3.141 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dev S. S., Venu A. (2016). Isolation and screening of antimicrobial peptides from Kanthari Mulaku (Capsicum frutescens). Int. J. Pharma. Bio Sci. 7, 174–179. [Google Scholar]
  27. Diamond G., Beckloff N., Weinberg A., Kisich K. O. (2009). The roles of antimicrobial peptides in innate host defense. Curr. Pharma. Des. 15, 2377–2392. 10.2174/138161209788682325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dias G. B., Gomes V. M., Pereira U. Z., Ribeiro S. F. F., Carvalho A. O., Rodrigues R., et al. (2013). Isolation, characterization and antifungal activity of proteinase inhibitors from Capsicum chinense Jacq. seeds. Protein J. 32, 15–26. 10.1007/s10930-012-9456-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dracatos P. M., Van Der Weerden N. L., Carroll K. T., Johnson E. D., Plummer K. M., Anderson M. A. (2014). Inhibition of cereal rust fungi by both class I and II defensins derived from the flowers of N icotiana alata. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15, 67–79. 10.1111/mpp.12066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Duke J., Wain K. (1981). “Medicinal plants of the world. Computer index with more than 85000 entries,” in Handbook of Medicinal Herbs (Florida, Boca Raton: CRC press; ), 96. [Google Scholar]
  31. Duke J. A. (1993). CRC handbook of alternative cash crops (Florida: CRC press; ). [Google Scholar]
  32. Duke J. A. (2008). Duke’s handbook of medicinal plants of Latin America (Florida: CRC press; ). [Google Scholar]
  33. Eftekhar F., Yousefzadi M., Tafakori V. (2005). Antimicrobial activity of Datura innoxia and Datura stramonium. Fitoterapia 76, 118–120. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Emboden W. (1972). Narcotic plants, hallucinogens, stimulants, inebriants and hypnotics-their origins and uses (Faraday CI, United Kingdom: Littlehampton Book Services Ltd; ). [Google Scholar]
  35. Epand R. M., Vogel H. J. (1999). Diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their mechanisms of action. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1462, 11–28. 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00198-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Feo V. D. (2004). The ritual use of Brugmansia species in Traditional Andean Medicine in Northern Peru. Eco. Bot. 58 (Supp.), S221–S229. 10.1663/0013-0001(2004)58[S221:TRUOBS]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fernández M. B., Pagano M. R., Daleo G. R., Guevara M. G. (2012). Hydrophobic proteins secreted into the apoplast may contribute to resistance against Phytophthora infestans in potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 60, 59–66. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Galdiero S., Falanga A., Cantisani M., Vitiello M., Morelli G., Galdiero M. (2013). Peptide-lipid interactions: experiments and applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 18758–18789. 10.3390/ijms140918758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Games P., Koscky-Paier C., Almeida-Souza H., Barbosa M., Antunes P., Carrijo L., et al. (2013). In vitro anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activities of hydrophilic plant defence compounds obtained from the leaves of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 88, 551–558. 10.1080/14620316.2013.11513005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ghatak A., Chaturvedi P., Paul P., Agrawal G. K., Rakwal R., Kim S. T., et al. (2017). Proteomics survey of Solanaceae family: Current status and challenges ahead. J. Proteomics 169, 41–57. 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ghosh M. (2009). Purification of a lectin-like antifungal protein from the medicinal herb, Withania somnifera. Fitoterapia 80, 91–95. 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Girish K., Machiah K., Ushanandini S., Harish Kumar K., Nagaraju S., Govindappa M., et al. (2006). Antimicrobial properties of a non-toxic glycoprotein (WSG) from Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha). J. Basic Microbiol. 46, 365–374. 10.1002/jobm.200510108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gründemann C., Stenberg K. G., Gruber C. W. (2019). T20K: An immunomodulatory cyclotide on its way to the clinic. Int. J. Pept. Res. Therap. 25, 9–13. 10.1007/s10989-018-9701-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Graham J., Quinn M., Fabricant D., Farnsworth N. (2000). Plants used against cancer–an extension of the work of Jonathan Hartwell. J. Ethnopharmacol. 73, 347–377. 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00341-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Guarrera P. M. (1999). Traditional antihelmintic, antiparasitic and repellent uses of plants in Central Italy. J. Ethnopharmacol. 68, 183–192. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00089-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Guevara M. G., Daleo G. R., Oliva C. R. (2001). Purification and characterization of an aspartic protease from potato leaves. Physiol. Plant 112, 321–326. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120304.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Guzmán-Ceferino J., Cobos-Puc L., Sierra-Rivera C., Esquivel J. C. C., Durán-Mendoza T., Silva-Belmares S. (2019). Partial characterization of the potentially bioactive protein fraction of Solanum marginatum L. f. Polibotánica 9 (47), 137–151. 10.18387/polibotanica.47.10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hancock R. E., Lehrer R. (1998). Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol. 16, 82–88. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01156-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hancock R. E. (2001). Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials. Lancet Infect. Dis. 1, 156–164. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00092-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Herbel V., Schäfer H., Wink M. (2015). Recombinant production of snakin-2 (an antimicrobial peptide from tomato) in E. coli and analysis of its bioactivity. Molecules 20, 14889–14901. 10.3390/molecules200814889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Holmstedt B., Bruhn J. G. (1983). Ethnopharmacology: A Challenge. J. Ethnopharmacol. 8, 251–256. 10.1016/0378-8741(83)90062-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jain A., Kumar A., Salunke D. M. (2016). Crystal structure of the vicilin from Solanum melongena reveals existence of different anionic ligands in structurally similar pockets. Sci. Rep. 6, 23600. 10.1038/srep23600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kaewklom S., Wongchai M., Petvises S., Hanpithakphong W., Aunpad R. (2018). Structural and biological features of a novel plant defensin from Brugmansia x candida. PloS One 13, e0201668. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Khare C. P. (2004). Indian herbal remedies: Rational Western therapy, ayurvedic, and other traditional usage, Botany (Berlin: Springer-Verleg; ), 523. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kim J.-Y., Park S.-C., Kim M.-H., Lim H.-T., Park Y., Hahm K.-S. (2005). Antimicrobial activity studies on a trypsin–chymotrypsin protease inhibitor obtained from potato. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 330, 921–927. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim J.-Y., Park S.-C., Hwang I., Cheong H., Nah J.-W., Hahm K.-S., et al. (2009). Protease inhibitors from plants with antimicrobial activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10, 2860–2872. 10.3390/ijms10062860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kovtun A., Istomina E., Slezina M., Odintsova T. (2018). Identification of antimicrobial peptides in Lycopersicon esculentum genome, in: Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematical Biology and Bioinformatics, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia. 10.17537/icmbb18.13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lay F. T., Brugliera F., Anderson M. A. (2003). Isolation and properties of floral defensins from ornamental tobacco and petunia. Plant Physiol. 131, 1283–1293. 10.1104/pp.102.016626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lee S. C., Hwang I. S., Choi H. W., Hwang B. K. (2008). Involvement of the pepper antimicrobial protein CaAMP1 gene in broad spectrum disease resistance. Plant Physiol. 148, 1004–1020. 10.1104/pp.108.123836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mahlapuu M., Håkansson J., Ringstad L., Björn C. (2016). Antimicrobial Peptides: An Emerging Category of Therapeutic Agents. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 6, 194–194. 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Malanovic N., Lohner K. (2016). Gram-positive bacterial cell envelopes: The impact on the activity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1858, 936–946. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Maracahipes Á. C., Taveira G. B., Mello E. O., Carvalho A. O., Rodrigues R., Perales J., et al. (2019). Biochemical analysis of antimicrobial peptides in two different Capsicum genotypes after fruit infection by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Biosci. Rep. 39, BSR20181889. 10.1042/BSR20181889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Marshall S. H., Arenas G. (2003). Antimicrobial peptides: A natural alternative to chemical antibiotics and a potential for applied biotechnology. Elec. J. Biotechnol. 6, 271–284. 10.2225/vol6-issue3-fulltext-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Matejuk A., Leng Q., Begum M. D., Woodle M. C., Scaria P., Chou S. T., et al. (2010). Peptide-based Antifungal Therapies against Emerging Infections. Drugs Fut. 35, 197–197. 10.1358/dof.2010.035.03.1452077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Meneguetti B. T., Machado L. S., Oshiro K. G. N., Nogueira M. L., Carvalho C. M. E., Franco O. L. (2017). Antimicrobial peptides from fruits and their potential use as biotechnological tools—A Review and Outlook. Front. Microbiol. 7 (2136), 1–13. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mir B. A., Khazir J., Mir N. A., Hasan T.-U., Koul S. (2012). Botanical, chemical and pharmacological review of Withania somnifera (Indian ginseng): an ayurvedic medicinal plant. Indian J. Drugs Dis. 1, 147–160. [Google Scholar]
  67. Molchanova N., Hansen P. R., Franzyk H. (2017). Advances in development of antimicrobial peptidomimetics as potential drugs. Molecules 22, 1–60. 10.3390/molecules22091430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Montesinos E. (2007). Antimicrobial peptides and plant disease control. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 270, 1–11. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00683.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Montville T. J., Kaiser A. L. (1993). “CHAPTER 1 - Antimicrobial Proteins: Classification, Nomenclature, Diversity, and Relationship to Bacteriocins,” in Bacteriocins of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Eds. Hoover D. G., Steenson. L. R. (San Diego, California: Academic Press; ), 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  70. Moulin M., Rodrigues R., Ribeiro S., Gonçalves L., Bento C., Sudré C., et al. (2014). Trypsin inhibitors from Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum leaves involved in Pepper yellow mosaic virus resistance. Gen. Mol. Res. 13, 9229–9243. 10.4238/2014.November.7.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Muhammad S. M., Sabo I. A., Gumel A. M., Fatima I. (2019). Extraction and purification of antimicrobial proteins from Datura Stramonium Seed. J. Adv. Biotechnol. 18, 1073–1077. 10.24297/jbt.v8i0.8221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nath P., Yadav A. K., Soren A. D. (2017). Sub-acute toxicity and genotoxicity assessement of the rhizome extract of Acorus calamus L., A medicinal plant of India. Eur. J. Pharm. Med. Res. 4, 392–399. [Google Scholar]
  73. Nawrot R., Barylski J., Nowicki G., Broniarczyk J., Buchwald W., Goździcka-Józefiak ,. A. (2014). Plant antimicrobial peptides. Folia Microbiol. 59, 181–196. 10.1007/s12223-013-0280-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Niño J., Correa Y., Mosquera O. (2006). Antibacterial, antifungal, and cytotoxic activities of 11 Solanaceae plants from Colombian biodiversity. Pharm. Biol. 44, 14–18. 10.1080/13880200500509124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Oliveira-Lima M., Benko-Iseppon A. M., Neto J., Rodriguez-Decuadro S., Kido E. A., Crovella S., et al. (2017). Snakin: Structure, roles and applications of a plant antimicrobial peptide. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 18, 368–374. 10.2174/1389203717666160619183140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Olmstead R. G., Bohs L. (2006). “A summary of molecular systematic research in Solanaceae: 1982-2006,” in VI International Solanaceae Conference: Genomics Meets Biodiversity 745, (Beljium: International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)), 255–268. [Google Scholar]
  77. Parisi M., Ortiz C., Hernández M. D. L. C., Paneca M., Rosso A. (2018).Biopreparations of Salpichroa Origanifolia for the control of pests and diseases affecting crops of economical interest, in: International Concerence: Centro de Bioplantas, Cuba. [Google Scholar]
  78. Park Y., Choi B. H., Kwak J.-S., Kang C.-W., Lim H.-T., Cheong H.-S., et al. (2005). Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Jopung). J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 6491–6496. 10.1021/jf0505123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ponstein A. S., Bres-Vloemans S. A., Sela-Buurlage M. B., Van Den Elzen P. J., Melchers L. S., Cornelissen B. J. (1994). A novel pathogen-and wound-inducible tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) protein with antifungal activity. Plant Physiol. 104, 109–118. 10.1104/pp.104.1.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Poth A. G., Mylne J. S., Grassl J., Lyons R. E., Millar A. H., Colgrave M. L., et al. (2012). Cyclotides associate with leaf vasculature and are the products of a novel precursor in petunia (Solanaceae). J. Biol. Chem. 287 (32), 27033–27046. 10.1074/jbc.M112.370841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Pushpanathan M., Gunasekaran P., Rajendhran J. (2013). Antimicrobial peptides: versatile biological properties. Int. J. Pept. 2013 (675391), 1–15. 10.1155/2013/675391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ribeiro S. F. F., Agizzio A. P., Machado O. L. T., Neves-Ferreira A. G. C., Oliveira M. A., Fernandes K. V. S., et al. (2007). A new peptide of melon seeds which shows sequence homology with vicilin: Partial characterization and antifungal activity. Sci. Hortic. 111, 399–405. 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.11.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rodrigues M. L. (2018). The multifunctional fungal ergosterol. mBio 9, e01755–e01718. 10.1128/mBio.01755-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Roy A. (2016). Bhut Jolokia (Capsicum chinense Jaqc): a review. Science 1118, 4. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ryan C. A., Pearce G. (2003). Systemins: a functionally defined family of peptide signals that regulate defensive genes in Solanaceae species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 100 (Suppl. 2), 14577–14580. 10.1073/pnas.1934788100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Salas C. E., Badillo-Corona J. A., Ramírez-Sotelo G., Oliver-Salvador C. (2015). Biologically active and antimicrobial peptides from plants. Bio. Res. Int. 2015, 102129–102129. 10.1155/2015/102129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sani M. A., Separovic F. (2016). How membrane- active peptides get into lipid membranes. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1130–1138. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sarnthima R., Khammuang S. (2012). Antibacterial activities of Solanum stramonifolium seed extract. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 14, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  89. Schmidt N. W., Wong G. C. L. (2013). Antimicrobial peptides and induced membrane curvature: geometry, coordination chemistry, and molecular engineering. Curr. Opin. Sol. Stat. Mat. Sci. 17, 151–163. 10.1016/j.cossms.2013.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Segura A., Moreno M., Madueno F., Molina A., Garcia-Olmedo F. (1999). Snakin-1, a peptide from potato that is active against plant pathogens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 12 (1), 16–23. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.1.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Shah V. V., Shah N. D., Patrekar P. V. (2013). Medicinal Plants from Solanaceae Family. Res. Pharm. Technol. 6, 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  92. Silva P., Gonçalves S., Santos N. (2014). Defensins: antifungal lessons from eukaryotes. Front. Microbiol. 5, 1–17. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Silva M. S., Ribeiro S. F., Taveira G. B., Rodrigues R., Fernandes K. V., Carvalho A. O., et al. (2017). Application and bioactive properties of CaTI, a trypsin inhibitor from Capsicum annuum seeds: membrane permeabilization, oxidative stress and intracellular target in phytopathogenic fungi cells. J. Sci. Food Agric. 97, 3790–3801. 10.1002/jsfa.8243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Simpson B. B., Conner-Ogorzaly M. (1986). Economic botany (New York: McGraw-Hill New York etc; ). [Google Scholar]
  95. Singh R., Suresh C. (2016). Purification and Characterization of a Small Chito-specific Lectin from Datura innoxia Seeds Possessing Anti-microbial Properties. Int. J. Biochem. Res. Rev. 9 (2), 1–17. 10.9734/IJBCRR/2016/22157 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Soni P., Siddiqui A. A., Dwivedi J., Soni V. (2012). Pharmacological properties of Datura stramonium L. as a potential medicinal tree: an overview. Asian Paci. J. Trop. Biomed. 2, 1002–1008. 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60014-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Stotz H. U., Spence B., Wang Y. (2009). A defensin from tomato with dual function in defense and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 71, 131–143. 10.1007/s11103-009-9512-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tamokou J. D. D., Mbaveng A. T., Kuete V. (2017). “Chapter 8 - Antimicrobial Activities of African Medicinal Spices and Vegetables,” in Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa. Ed. Kuete. V. (San Diego, California: Academic Press; ), 207–237. [Google Scholar]
  99. Taveira G. B., Mathias L. S., Da Motta O. V., Machado O. L., Rodrigues R., Carvalho A. O., et al. (2014). Thionin-like peptides from Capsicum annuum fruits with high activity against human pathogenic bacteria and yeasts. Pept. Sci. 102, 30–39. 10.1002/bip.22351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Taveira G. B., Carvalho A. O., Rodrigues R., Trindade F. G., Da Cunha M., Gomes V. M. (2016). Thionin-like peptide from Capsicum annuum fruits: mechanism of action and synergism with fluconazole against Candida species. BMC Microbiol. 16, 12. 10.1186/s12866-016-0626-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Theis T., Wedde M., Meyer V., Stahl U. (2003). The antifungal protein from Aspergillus giganteus causes membrane permeabilization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 588–593. 10.1128/AAC.47.2.588-593.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Tripathi G. R., Park J., Park Y., Hwang I., Park Y., Hahm K.-S., et al. (2006). Potide-G derived from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is active against potato virus YO (PVYO) infection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 8437–8443. 10.1021/jf061794p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Westermann J.-C., Craik D. J. (2010). “5.09 - Plant Peptide Toxins from Nonmarine Environments,” in Comprehensive Natural Products II. Eds. Liu H.-W., Mander. L. (Oxford: Elsevier; ), 257–285. [Google Scholar]
  104. Yadav R., Rathi M., Pednekar A., Rewachandani Y. (2016). A Detailed Review on Solanaceae Family. Eur. J. Pharma. Med. Res. 3, 369–378. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES