Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2020 Feb 11;203(5):977. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000656.02

REPLY BY AUTHORS

Heidi S Harvie 1, Cindy L Amundsen 2, Simon J Neuwahl 3, Amanda A Honeycutt 3, Emily S Lukacz 4, Vivian W Sung 5, Rebecca G Rogers 6,7, David Ellington 8, Cecile A Ferrando 9, Christopher J Chermansky 10, Donna Mazloomdoost 11, Sonia Thomas 3
PMCID: PMC7232841  NIHMSID: NIHMS1585699  PMID: 32073947

Subsequent to the publication of the guideline by Gormley et al (reference 10 in article) several studies have reported continued BTX efficacy and improved quality of life while maintaining the same median inter-injection intervals beyond 2-year followup.1-3 Causes for therapy discontinuation are most accurately reported in prospective studies. Thus, as referenced in the comment, the 3.5-year followup in the study by Nitti et al showed that 5.7% of discontinuations were due to lack of efficacy and the highest rate, 12%, was due to trial burden.4 For the 22 BTX participants who did not complete the study protocol a sensitivity analysis showed that assuming maximum BTX costs for all would raise 2-year BTX costs to almost $13,000, compared to 2-year SNM costs of $35,680 (supplementary Appendix C, https://www.jurology.com).

The ROSETTA study accommodated for advancements in lead technology and minimal stimulation thresholds during lead placement were incorporated in the study design, a novel concept for an InterStim® study. Thus, optimal lead placement was assessed by the high clinical responder rate (84%), low revision and removal rates (3% and 8.6%) and 2-year sustained efficacy (reference 14 in article).

Threshold analysis evaluated the impact of single stage vs 2-stage SNM implantation and length of SNM technology life. It showed that a single stage implantation technique would reduce SNM costs by 15% compared to 2-stage, but importantly this did not include implantation and explantation costs for the trial’s nonresponders. In addition, the assumption of rechargeable SNM technology would result in similar costs for SNM and BTX by 39 years for 2-stage and by 25 years for single stage implantation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ginsberg DA, Drake MJ, Kaufmann A et al. : Long-term treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA results in consistent, durable improvements in health related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder. J Urol 2017; 198: 897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dowson C, Watkins J, Khan MS et al. : Repeated botulinum toxin type A injections for refractory overactive bladder: medium-term outcomes, safety profile, and discontinuation rates. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Veeratterapillay R, Hardling C, Teo L et al. : Discontinuation rates and inter-injection interval for repeated intravesical botulinum toxin type A injection for detrusor overactivity. Int J Urol 2014; 21: 175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nitti VW, Ginsberg D, Sievert KD et al. : Durable efficacy and safety of long-term onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in patients with overactive bladder syndrome: final results of a 3.5-year study. J Urol 2016; 196: 791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES