Abstract
Second messenger signaling networks allow cells to sense and adapt to changing environmental conditions. In bacteria, the nearly ubiquitous second messenger molecule cyclic di-GMP coordinates diverse processes such as motility, biofilm formation, and virulence. In bacterial pathogens, these signaling networks allow the bacteria to survive changing environment conditions that are experienced during infection of a mammalian host. While studies have examined the effects of cyclic di-GMP levels on virulence in these pathogens, it has not been possible to visualize cyclic di-GMP levels in real time during the stages of host infection. Towards this goal, we generate the first ratiometric, chemiluminescent biosensor scaffold that selectively responds to c-di-GMP. By engineering the biosensor scaffold, a suite of Venus-YcgR-NLuc (VYN) biosensors is generated that provide extremely high sensitivity (KD < 300 pM) and large changes in bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) signal (up to 109%). As a proof-of-concept that VYN biosensors can image cyclic di-GMP in tissues, we show that the VYN biosensors function in the context of a tissue phantom model, with only ~103-104 biosensor-expressing E. coli cells required for the measurement. Furthermore, we utilize the biosensor in vitro to assess changes in cyclic di-GMP in V. cholerae grown with different inputs found in the host environment. The VYN sensors developed here can serve as robust in vitro diagnostic tools for high throughput screening, as well as genetically encodable tools for monitoring the dynamics of c-di-GMP in live cells, and lay the groundwork for live cell imaging of c-di-GMP dynamics in bacteria within tissues and other complex environments.
INTRODUCTION
The second messenger molecule cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) is a key regulator of bacterial physiology and behavior, coordinating diverse processes such as motility, biofilm formation, and virulence. First discovered as a stimulator of cellulose synthesis,1 c-di-GMP has since been found to be nearly ubiquitous in bacteria, with c-di-GMP signaling pathways often integrated with other global regulatory systems, such as phosphorylation networks and quorum sensing pathways.2,3 The intracellular levels of c-di-GMP are tightly regulated by diguanylate cyclase (DGC) and phosphodiesterase (PDE) enzymes that synthesize and degrade c-di-GMP, respectively. Many bacteria have an abundance of predicted DGC and PDE genes, suggesting unique c-di-GMP regulatory circuits are activated in response to different environmental cues. In many bacterial pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Clostridium difficile, Vibrio cholerae, and pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli, these complex c-di-GMP signaling networks allow the bacteria to adapt to and survive in the changing environmental conditions that are experienced during infection of a mammalian host.4 While multiple studies have examined the effects of c-di-GMP levels on virulence in these pathogens, there currently are no tools available that allow for the quantification of c-di-GMP in bacteria during stages of mammalian host infection. To interrogate these complex c-di-GMP signaling networks in bacteria over the course of the infection process, new analytical tools are needed for quantifying and imaging intracellular c-di-GMP levels within tissue over extended time frames.
Commonly used tools for analyzing intracellular c-di-GMP levels include phenotypic screens and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of bacterial cell extracts. Phenotypic screens for motility and biofilm formation can serve as proxies for measuring intracellular c-di-GMP levels.5,6 These assays can be high throughput and are useful in screening genetic knockouts, however they have low sensitivity and provide indirect measurement of c-di-GMP that can be complicated by pleiotropic effects. MS-based analysis of c-di-GMP from bacterial cell extracts is highly sensitive and quantitative, however the multi-step sample preparation and long analysis time required leads to reduced throughput.7–10 In addition, neither phenotypic assays nor mass spectrometry-based analysis can provide real-time, dynamic measurements of c-di-GMP in cells. To overcome these issues, our lab and others have developed several genetically encodable fluorescent biosensors that can report on single-cell dynamics of c-di-GMP using fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry.11–13 These tools are sensitive, can provide real-time measurements of c-di-GMP dynamics, and are amenable to high throughput screening. Notable examples include protein-based FRET biosensors that have been used to image c-di-GMP dynamics during asymmetric cell division in Caulobacter crescentus11 and RNA-based fluorescent sensors that were used to visualize c-di-GMP changes in E. coli in direct response to an environmental signal, zinc.14
One drawback of fluorescent biosensors, however, is that due to a reliance on external illumination, these systems are incompatible with imaging in deep tissues of animals and in long-term experiments due to phototoxicity and/or photobleaching. To expand the capabilities of genetically encodable tools for quantifying c-di-GMP levels to overcome these issues, our lab developed the first chemiluminescent biosensors for c-di-GMP15 based on the yellow Nano-lantern (YNL) scaffold and a complementation of split luciferase-bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (CSL-BRET) mechanism.16 These YNL-YcgR biosensors provide nanomolar sensitivity for c-di-GMP with high selectivity, large signal changes, and a luminescent signal that is produced without external illumination. The sensors were used to develop a rapid, plate-reader based assay for measuring diguanylate cyclase activity in bacterial lysates. The intensity-based signal of these sensors is useful for in vitro activity assays with lysates or purified enzymes where biosensor and luminescent substrate levels can be controlled. However, in long-term imaging experiments and/or situations where luminescent substrate availability differs between samples, signal quantitation becomes complicated for intensity-based sensors. We observed significant differences in luminescent substrate availability between high and low c-di-GMP conditions in E. coli, which obscured the intensity-based signal change of these biosensors in vivo (Figure S1). Accordingly, we were unable to apply the YNL sensors to live cell measurements of c-di-GMP in bacteria.15
Ratiometric BRET sensors using the engineered marine luciferase NanoLuc (NLuc)17 have recently been developed for imaging Ca2+,18 Zn2+,19 and membrane voltage,20 however to our knowledge no sensors of this type have been applied to imaging in bacteria to date. In this work, we generate a suite of BRET biosensors that selectively respond to c-di-GMP and produce ratiometric signal changes. The tVYN-TmΔ biosensor was applied in a plate reader-based assay to quantify c-di-GMP levels in V. cholerae extracts grown under a variety of conditions that mimic the infection cycle, with quantitation and sensitivity comparable to MS-based methods (limit of detection (LOD) = 30 fmol). We also show that luminescent biosensors producing ratiometric-based signal enable live cell imaging of c-di-GMP activity in E. coli over the course of an hour using an IVIS small animal imaging system.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Design of BRET sensor for cyclic di-GMP.
The starting BRET scaffold, V-NLuc, pairs the newly developed marine luciferase, NanoLuc (NLuc), with a truncation of the monomeric yellow fluorescent protein, Venus, as the donor and acceptor moieties, respectively, similar to the previously developed yellow enhanced Nano-lantern (YeNL).21 NLuc produces a glow-type luminescence with an emission maximum at 460 nm and an overall luminescent output ~100-150x that of the commonly used Renilla or firefly luciferases.17 Compared to the intensity-based yellow Nano-lantern (YNL) sensors for c-di-GMP previously designed by our lab that use a mutated version of Renilla luciferase as the donor moiety, the substitution of NLuc should produce significantly higher signal intensity, improved thermodynamic stability, and increased signal stability over time. The emission of NLuc overlaps well with the excitation of Venus, producing an efficient energy transfer in V-NLuc, as measured by the BRET ratio (530/460 nm) (Figure 1a).
Figure 1. Design and characterization of ratiometric VYN biosensors.
(a) Schematic for BRET mechanism of V-NLuc scaffold and the domain structure of the protein. Normalized luminescence emission spectra of purified V-NLuc at 50 nM. Data from 3 replicates are represented as the mean and normalized to 460 nm. (b) Two potential mechanisms for modulation of BRET ratios by c-di-GMP binding to VYN sensors resulting in (i) positive or (ii) negative signal change. (c) Normalized luminescence emission spectra of purified VYN-Ec at 50 nM in the presence (red line) and absence (black line) of c-di-GMP. Data from 3 replicates are represented as the mean and normalized to 460 nm. (d) Binding affinity measurements for purified VYN-Ec. Data are from 3 replicates represented as mean +/− SD.
To design a c-di-GMP sensor, a c-di-GMP-binding YcgR protein is inserted between Venus and NLuc (Figure 1b). YcgR-like proteins contain the c-di-GMP-binding PilZ domain at their C-terminus.22–24 These proteins typically undergo large conformational changes upon c-di-GMP binding,24 which has been harnessed for the generation of genetically encoded sensors for c-di-GMP.11,12,15,25 Thus, binding of c-di-GMP to a Venus-YcgR-NLuc (VYN) sensor should produce a change in energy transfer efficiency between Venus and NLuc, changing the BRET ratio. The change could be from low to high BRET ratio upon binding, or vice versa, thereby producing positive or negative signal changes, respectively (Figure 1b).
For initial testing of the sensor design, full-length YcgR protein from Escherichia coli (EcYcgR) was inserted into the BRET scaffold to generate VYN-Ec. The sensor was purified from E. coli after co-expression with the c-di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE) PdeH to ensure the sensor did not co-purify with endogenous c-di-GMP. The purified sensor showed a c-di-GMP dependent change from high to low BRET state (Figure 1c) while maintaining comparable brightness to V-NLuc (Figure S2). Promisingly, the BRET ratio of VYN-Ec remained stable over time even as overall signal intensity decreased due to consumption of luminescent substrate (Figure S3a, b). This property is unique to the ratiometric biosensor scaffold and provides a significant improvement over our previously developed YNL-YcgR sensors, in which the intensity of the signal is highly dependent upon concentration of luminescent substrate and complicated long-term and/or live cell measurements (Figure S1). VYN-Ec binds to two molecules of c-di-GMP with an apparent affinity (KD) of ~50 nM and a BRET signal change of −48% (Figure 1d). The sensor retains selectivity for c-di-GMP over structurally related cyclic dinucleotides (Figure S3c, d).
The affinity of the VYN-Ec sensor (KD~50 nM) is significantly higher compared to the equivalent YNL-EcYcgR sensor (KD~350 nM)15 and previously reported affinity values for EcYcgR (KD~800 nM).22 Since c-di-GMP binding to PilZ domains has been found to be largely entropically driven,24 this finding suggests that the VYN scaffold itself may be providing a degree of additional stability that results in a decreased entropic cost of binding c-di-GMP, leading to increased binding affinity. Encouraged by the VYN-Ec results, we sought to further improve the properties of the sensor via phylogenetic screening and semi-rational protein engineering.
Optimization of VYN biosensors.
Four phylogenetic YcgR variants previously characterized in the YNL scaffold were selected for testing in the VYN scaffold. These YcgR variants are from different thermophilic bacteria (Table S2), and were chosen because in the YNL scaffold they displayed high affinity, high stability, and large positive signal changes (TmYcgR, CpYcgR, and TbYcgR), or a moderate affinity and a moderate negative signal change (NtYcgR).15 Purified VYN-Tm, VYN-Nt, and VYN-Tb sensors exhibited c-di-GMP dependent changes in BRET, while the VYN-Cp sensor appeared non-responsive (Figure 2a). As expected, the functional sensors displayed higher affinities for c-di-GMP compared to VYN-Ec.
Figure 2. Optimization of VYN sensors for c-di-GMP.
(a) BRET ratios of purified VYN sensors containing phylogenetic variant YcgR proteins in response to varying levels of c-di-GMP. Data are from 3 replicates represented as mean +/− SD. (b) Schematic representations of the domain architectures of altered VYN scaffolds, using TmYcgR as an example. Red regions highlight where truncations were made. (c) Signal fold-change (defined as BRET ratio with 5 μM c-di-GMP added divided by BRET ratio with buffer added and plotted as log2(fold-change)) of the VYN sensor library screened in lysates. Dark gray boxes = dim signal; crossed-out boxes = not tested; ns = no significant signal fold-change (P > 0.05 determined by Student’s t-test). Data are from 4 biological replicates represented as the mean.
We sought to further improve the signal change of these VYN sensors through two routes: composite linker truncation and circular permutation of Venus. Both strategies are commonly used to improve signal change in the development of ratiometric sensors (FRET and BRET), but it is difficult to predict the effects on the resulting sensor26,27 Accordingly, a small library of VYN variants was generated to screen for sensors with improved properties (Figure 2b). For linker truncation, the “composite linkers” (defined as the N- and C-terminal residues of Venus, YcgR, and NLuc that are not necessary for fluorescence, ligand binding, or luminescence) were analyzed. For the truncated VYN (tVYN) scaffold, 2 additional C-terminal residues from Venus and 4 N-terminal residues from NLuc were removed.21 For YcgRΔ variants, the secondary structure prediction software SABLE was used to predict unstructured N- and C-terminal residues for removal (Table S2). For circular permutations of Venus (Vcp), a flexible five residue linker was added between the original N- and C-termini, and new termini are introduced. The five variants were chosen because they have been shown to not disrupt Venus fluorescence (Table S3).28
A library of 39 VYN variants was constructed and screened in a lysate-based assay that allows for biosensor performance to be rapidly assessed without protein purification. In this assay each individual sensor is co-expressed in E. coli with PdeH, cells are lysed, c-di-GMP is added to the lysate at specified concentrations (0, 50 nM, and 5 μM), and BRET ratios are measured. In Figure 2c, the log2(signal fold-change) values for each sensor are reported to simplify the comparison of positive and negative signal change sensors. While no clear trends could be drawn between designs, the small set of linker truncations and circular permutations tested produced at least one BRET sensor for each YcgR protein with a signal change of −30% or +50% (Figure S4). Interestingly, this screen showed that seemingly small alterations in the scaffold can produce large differences in signal fold-change. The switch from tVYN-Nt to tVYN-NtΔ, for example, produced a sensor with the same relative signal fold-change, but flipped from a positive to negative change in BRET ratios (Figure 1b).
A subset of the sensors from the library was purified and characterized in vitro and was shown to span a range of affinities from < 300 pM up to ~100 nM (Table 1). The tVYN-TmΔ sensor, to our knowledge, exhibits the highest affinity cyclic dinucleotide:protein interaction ever measured, and the largest magnitude signal change (Δ ratio of −1.04) out of all tested sensors in vitro. Interestingly, this sensor exhibited larger signal changes in vitro than in lysates, mostly due to truncated NLuc protein obscuring the BRET ratio in unpurified lysates (Figure S5). Given its desirable properties, we chose to apply the tVYN-TmΔ sensor to develop a plate reader assay for quantification of c-di-GMP in cell extracts.
Table 1.
Characteristics of selected VYN sensor variants
Sensor | Δ ratioa | % changea | KD(nM)a | Hill coefficienta |
---|---|---|---|---|
tVYN-TmΔb, c | −1.04 | −56% | <0.3 | −1.7 ± 0.03 |
tVYN-Tmb | −0.47 | −50% | 0.8 ± 0.03 | −1.7 ± 0.1 |
VYN-Tmb, c | −0.67 | −42% | 0.8 ± 0.2 | −1.5 ± 0.4 |
Vcp229-Tmb | −0.41 | −44% | 2.0 ± 0.1 | −1.5 ± 0.1 |
VYN-Tbc | 0.38 | 33% | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
tVYN-Tb | 0.18 | 38% | 12 ± 1 | 2.0 ± 0.3 |
Vcp229-Nt | 0.22 | 52% | 14 ± 1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
VYN-Ntc | 0.39 | 45% | 14 ± 4 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
Vcp173-Nt | 0.04 | 17% | 17 ± 4 | 2.0 ± 0.7 |
tVYN-Nt | 0.24 | 56% | 20 ± 1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
VYN-Ecc | −0.58 | −48% | 50 ± 4 | −1.5 ± 0.2 |
tVYN-NtΔ | −1.01 | −51% | 54 ± 4 | −1.7 ± 0.1 |
Vcp157-Cp | −0.39 | −33% | 96 ± 6 | −1.9 ± 0.2 |
Notes:
Data are from 3 replicates represented as mean ± SD.
Affinity measurements were made using 300 pM biosensor to determine KD values <3 nM.
Biosensor constructs were purified using an N-terminal His6 tag, as opposed to a C-terminal His6 tag for all others.
Quantification of c-di-GMP in Vibrio cholerae cell extracts.
The quantification of intracellular c-di-GMP levels is routinely performed using mass spectrometry (MS)-based analysis of bacterial cell extracts. These methods are highly sensitive and allow for the quantitation of c-di-GMP in the picomolar or femtomolar range, depending on the detection method used.7–9 However, the sample preparation steps, long analysis time, and expertise required to perform MS-based analysis of cell extracts has limited the accessibility and throughput of these types of experiments.
Given the extremely high affinity of the tVYN-TmΔ sensor for c-di-GMP, we predicted that it would be possible to develop a simple and robust plate reader-based assay for quantification of c-di-GMP. While the sensitivity was highest using 300 pM biosensor (Figure 3a), quantitation of extracts was performed with 3 nM biosensor due to improved signal intensity. Under these conditions, the limit of detection (signal-to-noise ratio 3:1) of the tVYN-TmΔ sensor was measured to be 30 fmol, which is comparable to the most sensitive established LC-MS/MS-based methods (Figure 3b).7,8 One drawback of the biosensor assay is the limited linear range (~30 fmol to 400 fmol), however this can be alleviated by diluting any samples that fall outside of this range (generally by 1:10-1:20) or using more biosensor.
Figure 3. Quantitation of c-di-GMP using tVYN-TmΔ biosensor.
(a) Binding affinity measurements for purified tVYN-TmΔ using 300 pM concentration of biosensor. Data are from 3 replicates represented as mean +/− SD. (b) Representative standard curve for c-di-GMP quantitation using purified tVYN-TmΔ at 3 nM concentration of biosensor. Data are from 6 replicates represented as mean +/− SD. (c) Quantitation of c-di-GMP in cell extracts of 3 different strains of V. cholerae (WT = wild-type; Δ6DGC = wild-type lacking 6 diguanylate cyclase genes; RΔvpsI/II = rugose). Quantitation was performed on the same samples using the tVYN-TmΔ biosensor and LC-MS/MS. Data are from 3 biological replicates represented as the mean +/− SD. (d) Quantitation of c-di-GMP using the tVYN-TmΔ biosensor in cell extracts of WT V. cholerae grown under different conditions. V. cholerae cells were grown to stationary phase either under virulence inducing medium (AKI_stat) or in Lysogeny broth (LB_stat). In addition, sets of cells were grown to exponential phase in LB: without NaCl, or supplemented with 0.1 or 0.3 M NaCl; with different pH; in presence or absence of oxygen (O2), iron chelator (2,2’-bipyridyl, BP), or mucin. Asterisks (*) denote significant changes in c-di-GMP between growth conditions (P < 0.05 determined by Student’s t-test). Data are from 3 biological replicates represented as the mean +/− SD, except for 25 and 37 °C conditions, which are from 6 biological replicates. All quantitation of c-di-GMP performed using the tVYN-TmΔ biosensor used 3 nM concentration of biosensor.
To directly compare the performance of our plate reader-based protocol to established LC-MS/MS methods, cell extract samples from V. cholerae were analyzed using both methods. Cell extracts were generated from three different strains of V. cholerae – wild-type (WT), wild-type lacking six DGCs (Δ6DGC), and rugose (RΔvpsI/II) – that were expected to produce endogenous, low, and high levels of c-di-GMP respectively.29,30 The expected differences in c-di-GMP were observed between the three strains and the quantitative data were closely correlated between the biosensor and LC-MS/MS measurements (Figure 3c; Figure S6).
Many V. cholerae cyclic di-GMP signaling enzymes have sensory domains, suggesting that their enzymatic activity is controlled by external cues. However, we have limited knowledge of the environmental stimuli that feed into cyclic di-GMP signaling in V. cholerae. Thus, we analyzed c-di-GMP levels for V. cholerae grown under a variety of different conditions that are experienced during the pathogen infection cycle, such as changes in salinity/osmolarity, pH, temperature, oxygen limitation, iron availability, and exposure to host molecule such as mucin (Figure 3d, Figure S7). For some conditions, c-di-GMP measurements had already been made. We have previously shown that both c-di-GMP levels and ability to form biofilms are increased at lower temperature (25 °C and 15 °C) relative to 37 °C.30 This trend was indeed observed, but the differences were not statistically significant due to high variability between biological replicates. It has been shown in many studies that cells grown to stationary phase in a medium called AKI induce high cholera toxin production,31 and expression of virulence factors like the toxin are repressed by c-di-GMP in V. cholerae.32 We indeed found that c-di-GMP levels decreased in cells grown to stationary phase in AKI versus lysogeny broth (LB) medium. A prior study showed no significant difference in c-di-GMP levels for V. cholerae cells grown exponentially in AKI versus LB,10 however it should be noted that different sampling parameters and strains (A1552 versus C6706) were used.
For five other conditions, enzyme activity, gene expression, or phenotypic studies indicated potential changes in c-di-GMP, and our biosensor results verify three of those predictions. Increased levels of c-di-GMP in low O2 conditions are consistent with the higher DGC activity of Vc Bhr-DGC analyzed in vitro under anaerobic conditions.33 A nonlinear effect was observed for salinity, with highest levels of c-di-GMP in cells grown at 0.1 M NaCI. This result actually is consistent with the increased expression levels of biofilm genes at median salinity (0.1 M) compared to low (0 M) and high (0.2-0.5 M) salinity.34 Decreased c-di-GMP levels was observed in cells exposed to acidic pH. This finding is consistent with a report that biofilm formation is decreased when V. cholerae is grown under acidic conditions, which the gastrointestinal pathogen experiences.35
No change in c-di-GMP was observed with addition of an iron chelator (BP, bipyridyl) or in the presence of mucin, however. Decreased biofilm formation has been observed with addition of iron chelators to biofilm medium36 and mucin has been shown to decrease expression of biofilm genes.37 Since regulation of biofilm formation is multifactorial, it is possible that the effects on biofilm formation/gene expression are not due to changes in c-di-GMP levels or that there are strain differences.
To summarize the above results, we report for the first time that cellular c-di-GMP levels are higher at intermediate salinity (0.1 M), increase with oxygen limitation, decrease with low pH, and can be lower in AKI versus LB in stationary phase. The limit of detection of the biosensor assay is comparable to the most sensitive established LC-MS/MS methods, but is plate-based and significantly more rapid, which makes it well-suited to high-throughput screening applications, such as monitoring enzyme activity or high throughput screening of activators/inhibitors of DGCs and PDEs.38 Accordingly, we determined the Z’ factor to be >0.5 for the duration of 30 min after substrate addition (Figure S8), which is considered to be excellent statistical reliability for high-throughput screening.39 We even have found that the biosensor signal is sufficiently bright to be analyzed using a digital camera, which drastically reduces the cost of hardware required for c-di-GMP quantification. When applied to analysis of V. cholerae extracts, the biosensor assay was able to reliably quantify c-di-GMP concentrations for different strains and under different growth conditions. These results suggest that the biosensor assay will be generally applicable to the study of c-di-GMP in complex bacterial extract samples, including clinical isolates and mixed cultures.
Live-cell measurements of c-di-GMP using IVIS imager and tissue-like phantom model.
With our prior YNL-based sensors we were unable to perform live cell measurements, likely due to changes in luminescent substrate availability and biosensor expression between different conditions that complicated normalization of the intensity-based signal (Figure S1).15To test if the ratiometric VYN biosensors alleviate these issues for live cell measurements, a subset of sensors were co-expressed in BL21 Star (DE3) E. coli with a constitutively active diguanylate cyclase (DGC) (WspR-D70E – elevated c-di-GMP) or the inactive diguanylate cyclase as a control (WspR-G249A). A previous study found that E. coli cells expressing WspR D70E had very high intracellular concentrations of c-di-GMP (~3 mM) as measured by LC/MS or a fluorescent dye assay,40 which was expected to max out the biosensor signal. Endogenous c-di-GMP in E. coli is in the low nanomolar range (< 20 nM based on LC/MS detection limit),41 and due to different considerations for quantitation in live cells versus extracts (see Supplemental Discussion), we expected little-to-no biosensor response under this condition.
Encouragingly, many of the sensors showed significant changes in BRET ratio between endogenous versus elevated c-di-GMP conditions. While it was not possible to determine intracellular c-di-GMP concentrations due to experimental considerations (see Supplemental Discussion), these sensors show consistent changes in BRET ratios in vivo, whereas our original intensity-based sensors had not.15 Therefore, they may be useful to analyze qualitative changes in c-di-GMP. Notably, tVYN-TmΔ did not perform as well as other sensors for live cell analysis compared to extract quantitation (see Figure S5 and Supplemental Discussion), so was not carried forward for in vivo experiments.
One of our long-term goals is to monitor signaling activity of bacterial cells in real time within animal tissue. An initial proof-of-concept experiment was to validate the signal intensity and BRET signal changes of our sensors measured in an instrument routinely used for non-invasive small animal imaging, a Xenogen IVIS 100, with conventional filter sets and settings. Selected sensors were co-expressed in BL21 Star (DE3) E. coli cells with WspR-G249A or WspR-D70E to produce endogenous or elevated c-di-GMP levels, respectively. Cells were prepared in the same manner as for plate reader experiments, then images were captured sequentially after luminescent substrate addition using no emission filter and standard 500 and 540 nm emission filters on the IVIS. The total flux (photons/sec) from each well in the 540 nm and 500 nm filter images was used to calculate BRET ratios (Figure 5a).
Figure 5. Live cell measurements of c-di-GMP using a tissue phantom model.
(a) Luminescent images of 2-fold diluted E. coli cultures co-expressing VYN biosensors with WspR-G249A or WspR-D70E captured by an IVIS 100, and the BRET values calculated from the total radiance in each well. Maximum and minimum radiance values (photons/sec/cm2/steradian) captured for each image are shown. (b) Same as part (a), except plate was covered with a 1.5 mm thick tissue phantom prior to image capture. (c) BRET ratios of serially diluted E. coli cultures co-expressing VYN biosensors with WspR-G249A or WspR-D70E calculated from the radiance of each well. Plate was covered with a 1.5 mm thick tissue phantom prior to image capture. For all IVIS experiments, cell dilutions were incubated for ~1 hour prior to the addition of luminescent substrate, and images were captured ~30 sec after luminescent substrate addition. For all graphs, data are from 3 biological replicates represented as mean +/− SD. Asterisks (*) denote significant changes in BRET ratio (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005 determined by Student’s t-test).
The raw BRET ratio values are different between IVIS and plate reader instruments, likely due to less optimal emission filters for the biosensor on the IVIS. Nevertheless, the changes in BRET ratio in response to c-di-GMP were faithfully reproduced for VYN-Ec and tVYN-NtΔ sensors with 2- and 200-fold fold dilution of cells (Figures 5a, S9a). With much higher dilution (20,000-fold) and thus lower signal-to-noise, the tVYN-NtΔ sensor but not VYN-Ec maintained the expected response to c-di-GMP, due to its larger magnitude signal change (ΔBRET ~1 vs. ~0.5).
To further extend the proof-of-concept, tissue-like phantom materials were utilized to mimic the light absorption and scattering of living tissue.42 These types of tissue phantoms have recently been used as a benchmark to compare photon output of luminescent protein systems within deep tissues.43 The 96-well plate containing bacterial cells was covered with 1.5 mm thick tissue phantom prior to image capture (Figure S10). While luminescent intensity and BRET ratios were generally lower with application of the tissue phantom (Figure S9b, the latter due to hemoglobin absorbing more strongly at 540 nm than 500 nm),44 the overall results were similar to without phantom (Figure 5b). Luminescent signal still could be detected down to 20,000-fold dilution for all samples, but the total fluxes are 23 to 30-fold lower with phantom applied (Figure S9b). The tVYN-NtΔ sensor displayed significant response to c-di-GMP down to 20,000-fold dilution, but sensors with more modest BRET ratio changes were obscured (Figure 5c).
To determine the amount of bacteria monitored in the IVIS experiments, the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) was measured for representative cultures co-expressing the tVYN-NtΔ biosensor and WspR-G249A or WspR-D70E. Cells were prepared as before and then spotted onto LB/Agar plates containing no antibiotic, carbenicillin (Carb), kanamycin (Kan), or both Carb and Kan, the last condition being the overnight growth conditions used for all live-cell experiments. Results from plates with no antibiotics show that there are ~108 E. coli in each well for 2-fold diluted cultures, and ~106 and ~104 cells in the 200-fold and 20,000-fold diluted cultures, respectively, as expected. However, comparisons to antibiotic plates reveal that ~90% of these cells have lost both biosensor and WspR expression plasmids after overnight growth (Figure S11). Thus, the actual number of bacteria producing luminescent signal is only 10% of the total. Given the tVYN-NtΔ sensor is capable of imaging c-di-GMP levels in 20,000-fold diluted cultures in a tissue-like model, this corresponds to as few as ~103 biosensor-expressing bacterial cells. In comparison, a V. cholerae infection model of infant mice presented 104 to 105bacteria in the small intestine after infection.45
Importantly, we found that the BRET ratio signal for tVYN-NtΔ sensor under the tissue phantom remained stable over the course of an hour after luminescent substrate addition, even while overall signal intensity decayed as substrate was consumed (Figure S9c). While the tissue phantom model does not account for substrate distribution in vivo, NLuc and furimazine previously have been applied to study the spread of pathogens in mice in real time.46,47 Our experiments were performed using coelenterazine-h as the luminescent substrate, so even brighter luminescent signal in vivo should be possible with furimazine, which produces higher luminescent output than coelenterazine-h.17
CONCLUSIONS
The work here presents, to our knowledge, the first ratiometric, luminescent biosensors developed to study bacterial signaling. The highest affinity VYN biosensor, tVYN-TmΔ, can serve as an easy-to-use diagnostic reagent for quantifying c-di-GMP levels from bacterial extracts, with comparable sensitivity to LC-MS/MS. Furthermore, as a genetically encodable tool, the tVYN-NtΔ sensor holds considerable promise for monitoring c-di-GMP dynamics in real-time within tissues using a standard small animal imaging system. More broadly, this study demonstrates how to develop and characterize luminescent biosensors that are directed towards studying bacterial activity in complex environments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemiluminescence measurements with purified protein.
Briefly, proteins and ligands were prepared in opaque white 96-well LUMITRAC 600 plates (Grenier) in assay buffer [50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 100 mM KCl, 10 mM DTT, 0.1% BSA], Unless otherwise noted, all measurements using purified protein were made using 3 nM sensor in 100 μL total reaction volume, then incubated at 28 °C for at least 10 min to reach binding equilibrium. Chemiluminescent substrate was prepared by diluting coelenterazine-h to 60 μM in reagent buffer [50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 100 mM KCl, 300 mM ascorbate], and equilibrating the solution at RT for at least 30 min. Unless otherwise noted, all biosensor measurements were taken at 28 °C in a SpectraMax i3x plate reader (Molecular Devices) after manually adding 20 μL of chemiluminescent substrate. Emission intensities were measured at 460 and 530 nm with 200 ms integration time at 30 s intervals for 10 min after chemiluminescent substrate addition. In general, BRET ratios were calculated using emission values obtained 2 min after substrate addition. For emission spectrum measurements, emission intensities were measured over the range of 400-600 nm in steps of 2 nm.
Lysate-based assay for biosensor activity.
The lysate-based assay was carried out as previously described, with minor modifications.15 Single colonies of BL21 Star (DE3) E. coli cells co-transformed with pET21-biosensor and pCOLA-PdeH plasmids were resuspended in 500 μL of P-0.5G non-inducing media [0.5% glucose, 25 mM - (NH4)2SO4, 50 mM KH2PO4, 50 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM MgSO4]48 supplemented with 50 μg/mL carbenicillin and 100 μg/mL kanamycin in 2.2 mL 96-well deep-well plates (VWR). Precultures were grown at 37 °C, 340 rpm for 24 h at which point 5 μL of each was used to inoculate 500 μL of ZYP-5052 autoinduction media [25 mM (NH4)2SO4, 50 mM KH2PO4, 50 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.5% (v/v) glycerol, 0.05% glucose, 0.2% α-lactose, 1% tryptone, and 0.5% yeast extract]48 supplemented with 50 μg/mL carbenicillin and 100 μg/mL kanamycin. Cultures were grown in ZYP-5052 autoinduction media at 37 °C, 340 rpm for 20 h to express the biosensors, then harvested by centrifugation at 4700 rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C. Lysates were prepared by removing the supernatant media and resuspending cell pellets in 500 μL of screening buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 300 μg/mL lysozyme, 1 mM PMSF], Cells were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C to gently lyse, and total lysates were centrifuged for 40 min at 4700 rpm at 4 °C to generate clarified lysates.
For chemiluminescence measurements, 5 μL of clarified lysate was mixed with 85 μL screening buffer (-lysozyme, -PMSF) and 10 μL of either buffer, 500 nM c-di-GMP, or 50 μM c-di-GMP [in screening buffer (-lysozyme, -PMSF)] in opaque white 96-well LUMITRAC 600 plates (Greiner) to generate final concentrations of 0, 50 nM, or 5 μM c-di-GMP. Chemiluminescence was measured using the same method described for purified protein, except BRET ratios were calculated using emission values obtained 1 min after substrate addition.
Vibrio cholerae strains and growth conditions.
Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor A1552 was used as the wild-type strain and two V. cholerae strains, Δ6DGC30 and RΔvpsI-II,49 were used as reference strains with low and high cellular c-di-GMP level, respectively. Strains were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium [1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.2 M NaCl; pH 7.5] with constant shaking at 200 rpm at 37°C unless otherwise indicated. To test the effects of salt concentration, LB supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl (0, 0.1, and 0.3M) were used.50 To test the effects of different growth temperature30 and oxygen availability, the diluted cultures were grown at 25 and 37 °C to OD600 ~0.5 or aerobically and anaerobically (in a Vinyl Anaerobic Airlock Chamber, Coy Laboratory Products) to OD600 ~0.3. To test the effects of mucin addition51 and iron depletion,52 overnight-grown cultures were inoculated in a 1:200 dilution in LB supplemented with different components [0.4% (w/v) of bovine submaxillary gland mucin (Sigma-Aldrich), or 200 μM of 2,2’-bipyridyl (Alfa Aesar), respectively] and grown to OD600 ~0.5. To test virulence-inducing conditions, overnight-grown cultures were inoculated in a 1:200 dilution in LB and in a 1:100 dilution in AKI [1.5% Bacto peptone, 0.4% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl, 0.3% NaHCO3]. LB cultures were grown overnight with shaking at 220 rpm at 37 °C. AKI cultures were grown statically at 37 °C for 4 hours followed by shaking at 220 rpm at 37 °C overnight.31 To test the effect of acidic conditions, overnight-grown cultures were inoculated in a 1:200 dilution in LB (pH 7), grown to OD600 ~0.5, and centrifuged at 1500 x g for 7 minutes. Cell pellets were adapted by resuspending in LB (pH 5.7) and incubating for 1 hour. Adapted cells were centrifugated and resuspended in LB (pH 4) followed by 1 hour incubation.53
Live cell measurements with biosensor co-expression.
Single colonies of BL21 Star (DE3) E. coli cells co-transformed with pET21-biosensor and pCOLA-PdeH, pCOLA-WspR-G249A, or pCOLA-WspR-D70E plasmids were resuspended and grown in the same manner as previously described for the lysate-based assay. After growth and induction of expression, cells were centrifuged, supernatant media was removed, and cell pellets were resuspended in 500 μL PBS [137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.4)]. For chemiluminescence measurements, cells were diluted 2-fold with PBS in an opaque 96-well LUMITRAC 600 plate (Greiner) to a final volume of 100 μL. Chemiluminescent substrate was added and emission intensities were measured in the same way as described for purified protein. BRET ratios were calculated using emission values obtained 5 min after substrate addition.
Live cell measurements in tissue-like phantom model.
Tissue-like phantoms were prepared as described previously.42 Briefly, the phantom solution mixture was prepared with 10% gelatin, 170 μM bovine hemoglobin, and 1% intralipid in TBS-azide buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NaN3]. Phantoms were poured to the desired thickness of 1.5 mm between glass plates to ensure uniformity, then stored at 4 °C.
Chemiluminescence measurements were carried out in a Xenogen IVIS 100 Bioluminescent Imager at the Huntsman Cancer Institute Center for Quantitative Cancer Imaging. Cells were grown and prepared in the same way as the live cell co-expression experiments but were diluted 2-fold, 200-fold, and 20,000-fold in PBS in opaque black 96-well assay plates (CoStar). To image the plates, 20 μL of chemiluminescent substrate was added to each well and plates were placed in the chamber. Luminescent images were captured sequentially using no filter, a 500 nm filter, and a 540 nm filter within a 13 cm field of view. The instrument was set to auto-adjust settings to ensure maximum signal for each image (exposure time of 0.5-60 s, binning of 1x-16x, f/stop of 1). For experiments with tissue-like phantom model, the wells were covered with a phantom immediately after addition of chemiluminescent substrate, and luminescent images were captured as before. For image analysis, a 12x8 ROI grid was applied to each image and used to calculate the flux (photons/s) for each individual well. For time course images, the same plate was repeatedly imaged for up to an hour after the initial addition of chemiluminescent substrate.
Supplementary Material
Figure 4. Live cell measurements of c-di-GMP using VYN sensors.
BRET ratios of live E. coli cells co-expressing VYN biosensors along with WspR-G249A (control, catalytically inactive mutant) or WspR-D70E (constitutively active diguanylate cyclase mutant). Luminescence measurements were performed in a plate reader. Data are from 4 biological replicates represented as mean +/− SD.
Acknowledgments
FUNDING
This work was supported in part by NIH grant R01 GM124589 (to M.C.H.), NIH grant R01 AI102584 (to F.H.Y.), NIH training grant T32 GM066698 (for A.B.D.), and the Community Science Program project 1473 (to M.C.H.) by the Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, that is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Includes additional methods, live cell imaging schematic, additional biosensor characterizations, lysate-based VYN biosensor screen, further biosensor analysis of V. cholerae strains, determination of Z’ factors for plate reader assays, additional live cell data with tissue phantom, tissue phantom imaging setup schematic, CFUs in live cell measurements of c-di-GMP, amino acid sequences of proteins in the biosensor scaffolds, oligonucleotides used in this study, and supplemental discussion.
This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES
- (1).Ross P, Weinhouse H, Aloni Y, Michaeli D, Weinberger-Ohana P, Mayer R, Braun S, de Vroom E, van der Marel GA, van Boom JH, and Benziman M (1987) Regulation of cellulose synthesis in Acetobacter xylinum by cyclic diguanylic acid. Nature 325, 279–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Romling U, Galperin MY, and Gomelsky M (2013) Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 1–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Jenal U, Reinders A, and Lori C (2017) Cyclic di-GMP: Second messenger extraordinaire. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 271–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Hall CL, and Lee VT (2018) Cyclic-di-GMP regulation of virulence in bacterial pathogens. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RnA 9, 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Wolfe AJ, and Berg HC (1989) Migration of bacteria in semisolid agar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86, 6973–6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).O’Toole G, Pratt L, Watnick P, Newman D, Weaver V, and Kolter R (1999) Genetic Approaches to Study of Biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 310, 91–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Petrova OE, and Sauer K (2017) High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)-Based Detection and Quantitation of Cellular c-di-GMP, in Methods Mol. Biol, pp 33–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Burhenne H, and Kaever V (2013) Quantification of Cyclic Dinucleotides by Reversed-Phase LC-MS/MS, in Methods Mol. Biol, pp 27–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Spangler C, Böhm A, Jenal U, Seifert R, and Kaever V (2010) A liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry method for quantitation of cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate. J. Microbiol. Methods 81, 226–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Koestler BJ, and Waters CM (2013) Exploring environmental control of cyclic di-gmp signaling in vibrio cholerae by using the ex vivo lysate cyclic di-GMP assay(TELCA). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5233–5241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Christen M, Kulasekara HD, Christen B, Kulasekara BR, Hoffman LR, and Miller SI (2010) Asymmetrical Distribution of the Second Messenger c-di-GMP upon Bacterial Cell Division. Science 328, 1295–1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Ho CL, Shi K, Chong J, Oppong JA, Lay M, Chuah C, Tan SM, and Liang Z (2013) Visualizing the Perturbation of Cellular Cyclic di-GMP Levels in Bacterial Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 566–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Wang XC, Wilson SC, and Hammond MC (2016) Next-generation fluorescent RNA biosensors enable anaerobic detection of cyclic di-GMP. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Yeo J, Dippel AB, Wang XC, and Hammond MC (2018) In Vivo Biochemistry: Single-Cell Dynamics of Cyclic Di-GMP in Escherichia coli in Response to Zinc Overload. Biochemistry 57, 108–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Dippel AB, Anderson WA, Evans RS, Deutsch S, and Hammond MC (2018) Chemiluminescent Biosensors for Detection of Second Messenger Cyclic di-GMP. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 1872–1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Saito K, Chang Y-F, Horikawa K, Hatsugai N, Higuchi Y, Hashida M, Yoshida Y, Matsuda T, Arai Y, and Nagai T (2012) Luminescent proteins for highspeed single-cell and whole-body imaging. Nat. Commun. 3, 1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Hall MP, Unch J, Binkowski BF, Valley MP, Butler BL, Wood MG, Otto P, Zimmerman K, Vidugiris G, Machleidt T, Robers MB, Benink A, Eggers CT, Slater MR, Meisenheimer PL, Klaubert DH, Fan F, Encell LP, and Wood KV (2012) Engineered Luciferase Reporter from a Deep Sea Shrimp Utilizing a Novel Imidazopyrazinone Substrate. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 1848–1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Yang J, Cumberbatch D, Centanni S, Shi S-Q, Winder D, Webb D, and Johnson CH (2016) Coupling optogenetic stimulation with NanoLuc-based luminescence (Bret) Ca sensing. Nat. Publ. Gr. 7, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Aper SJA, Dierickx P, and Merkx M (2016) Dual readout BRET/FRET-sensors for measuring intracellular zinc. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 2854–2864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Inagaki S, Tsutsui H, Suzuki K, Agetsuma M, Arai Y, Jinno Y, Bai G, Daniels MJ, Okamura Y, Matsuda T, and Nagai T (2017) Genetically encoded bioluminescent voltage indicator for multi-purpose use in wide range of bioimaging. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Suzuki K, Kimura T, Shinoda H, Bai G, Daniels MJ, Arai Y, Nakano M, and Nagai T (2016) Five colour variants of bright luminescent protein for real-time multicolour bioimaging. Nat. Commun. 7, 13718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Ryjenkov DA, Simm R, Romling U, and Gomelsky M (2006) The PilZ domain is a receptor for the second messenger c-di-GMP: The PilZ domain protein YcgR controls motility in enterobacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30310–30314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Ko J, Ryu KS, Kim H, Shin JS, Lee JO, Cheong C, and Choi BS (2010) Structure of PP4397 Reveals the Molecular Basis for Different c-di-GMP Binding Modes by Pilz Domain Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 97–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Benach J, Swaminathan SS, Tamayo R, Handelman SK, Folta-Stogniew E, Ramos JE, Forouhar F, Neely H, Seetharaman J, Camilli A, and Hunt JF (2007) The structural basis of cyclic diguanylate signal transduction by PilZ domains. EMBO J. 26, 5153–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Pultz IS, Christen M, Kulasekara HD, Kennard A, Kulasekara B, and Miller SI (2012) The response threshold of Salmonella PilZ domain proteins is determined by their binding affinities for c-di-GMP. Mol. Microbiol. 86, 1424–1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Deuschle K, Okumoto S, Fehr M, Looger LL, Kozhukh L, and Frommer WB (2005) Construction and optimization of a family of genetically encoded metabolite sensors by semirational protein engineering. Protein Sci. 14, 2304–2314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).van Rosmalen M, Krom M, and Merkx M (2017) Tuning the Flexibility of Glycine-Serine Linkers To Allow Rational Design of Multidomain Proteins. Biochemistry 56, 6565–6574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Nagai T, Yamada S, Tominaga T, Ichikawa M, and Miyawaki A (2004) Expanded dynamic range of fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ by circularly permuted yellow fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 10554–10559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Beyhan S, and Yildiz FH (2007) Smooth to rugose phase variation in Vibrio cholerae can be mediated by a single nucleotide change that targets c-di-GMP signalling pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 63, 995–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Townsley L, and Yildiz FH (2015) Temperature affects c-di-GMP signalling and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 4290–4305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Iwanaga M, Yamamoto K, Higa N, Ichinose Y, Nakasone N, and Tanabe M (1986) Culture Conditions for Stimulating Cholera Toxin Production by Vibrio cholerae 01 El Tor. Microbiol. Immunol. 30, 1075–1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Conner JG, Zamorano-Sanchez D, Park JH, Sondermann H, and Yildiz FH (2017) The ins and outs of cyclic di-GMP signaling in Vibrio cholerae. Physiol. Behav. 176, 139–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Schaller RA, Ali SK, Klose KE, and Kurtz DM (2012) A bacterial hemerythrin domain regulates the activity of a Vibrio cholerae diguanylate cyclase. Biochemistry 51, 8563–8570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Shikuma NJ, and Yildiz FH (2009) Identification and characterization of OscR, a transcriptional regulator involved in osmolarity adaptation in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 191, 4082–4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Hostacka A, Ciznar I, and Stefkovicova M (2010) Temperature and pH Affect the Production of Bacterial Biofilm. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 55, 75–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Mey AR, Craig SA, and Payne SM (2005) Characterization of Vibrio cholerae RyhB: The RyhB regulon and role of ryhB in biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 73, 5706–5719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Liu Z, Wang Y, Liu S, Sheng Y, Rueggeberg KG, Wang H, Li J, Gu FX, Zhong Z, Kan B, and Zhu J (2015) Vibrio cholerae represses polysaccharide synthesis to promote motility in mucosa. Infect. Immun. 83, 1114–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Opoku-Temeng C, Zhou J, Zheng Y, Su J, and Sintim HO (2016) Cyclic dinucleotide (c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, and cGAMP) signalings have come of age to be inhibited by small molecules. Chem. Commun. 52, 9327–9342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Ji-Hu Z, Thomas DYC, and Kevin RO (1999) A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 4, 67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Nakayama S, Kelsey I, Wang J, Roelofs K, Stefane B, Luo Y, Lee VT, and Sintim HO (2011) Thiazole orange-induced c-di-GMP quadruplex formation facilitates a simple fluorescent detection of this ubiquitous biofilm regulating molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4856–4864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Lacanna E, Bigosch C, Kaever V, Boehm A, and Becker A (2016) Evidence for Escherichia coli diguanylate cyclase DgcZ interlinking surface sensing and adhesion via multiple regulatory routes. J. Bacteriol. 198, 2524–2535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).De Grand AM, Lomnes SJ, Lee DS, Pietrzykowski M, Ohnishi S, Morgan TG, Gogbashian A, Laurence RG, and Frangioni JV (2006) Tissue-like phantoms for near-infrared fluorescence imaging system assessment and the training of surgeons. J. Biomed. Opt. 11, 014007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Chu J, Oh Y, Sens A, Ataie N, Dana H, Macklin JJ, Laviv T, Welf ES, Dean KM, Zhang F, Kim BB, Tang CT, Hu M, Baird MA, Davidson MW, Kay MA, Fiolka R, Yasuda R, Kim DS, Ng H-L, and Lin MZ (2016) A bright cyan-excitable orange fluorescent protein facilitates dual-emission microscopy and enhances bioluminescence imaging in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 760–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Zhao H, Doyle TC, Coquoz O, Kalish F, Rice BW, and Contag CH (2005) Emission spectra of bioluminescent reporters and interaction with mammalian tissue determine the sensitivity of detection in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 10, 041210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Tamayo R, Patimalla B, and Camilli A (2010) Growth in a biofilm induces a hyperinfectious phenotype in Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 78, 3560–3569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Tran V, Moser LA, Poole DS, and Mehle A (2013) Highly Sensitive RealTime In Vivo Imaging of an Influenza Reporter Virus Reveals Dynamics of Replication and Spread. J. Virol. 87, 13321–13329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Silberstein E, Serna C, Fragoso SP, Nagarkatti R, and Debrabant A (2018) A novel nanoluciferase-based system to monitor Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice by bioluminescence imaging. PLoS One 13, 1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Studier FW (2005) Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Fong JCN, Syed KA, Klose KE, and Yildiz FH (2010) Role of Vibrio polysaccharide (vps) genes in VPS production, biofilm formation and Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis. Microbiology 156, 2757–2769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Shikuma NJ, Davis KR, Fong JNC, and Yildiz FH (2013) The transcriptional regulator, CosR, controls compatible solute biosynthesis and transport, motility and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 1387–1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Silva AJ, Pham K, and Benitez JA (2003) Haemagglutinin/protease expression and mucin gel penetration in El Tor biotype Vibrio cholerae. Microbiology 149, 1883–1891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Rogers MB, Sexton JA, DeCastro GJ, and Calderwood SB (2000) Identification of an operon required for ferrichrome iron utilization in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 182, 2350–2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Merrell DS, Hava DL, and Camilli A (2002) Identification of novel factors involved in colonization and acid tolerance of Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1471–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.