Dear Editors:
We had great interest in the article by Yael et al.1 It confirmed that the gastrointestinal symptoms (especially for diarrhea) were common in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In comparison with the other reports on this topic,2 , 3 this case-control study can provide more significance and credibility owing to the correction of baseline status for gastrointestinal symptoms in non– patients with COVID-19. However, we do have some concerns about it.
First, the setting of the control group was arbitrary. The distribution and detail of various diseases were unclear (lung diseases or others). It may decrease the reliability benefited from case-control study. Second, the evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms mainly depended on the subjective judgement of patients, which might be inaccurate and misunderstood. It was imperfect that no objective evidence from laboratory or imaging examination confirmed the final conclusion.
Third, huge heterogeneity existed among the nonsevere, severe, and critical groups classified by the COVID-19 guidance.4 The subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the ward where the patients with COVID-19 stayed (hospital or intensive care admission). It was a lack of accuracy and rigor for differentiating the condition status in patients with COVID-19. It may neutralize the differences relating to various degrees of COVID-19.
In response to the shortcomings above, our clinical data can provide additional evidence to refine this topic on COVID-19. For balancing the baseline status in control groups, 122 non–COVID-19 pneumonia, 99 lung tumors, and 248 healthy patients participating medical examination, who were definitely determined to not have COVID-19, were randomly recruited for comparative analysis at the corresponding period. In Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (January to March, 2020), 148 patients with COVID-19 with their information about gastrointestinal symptoms and fecal examination were recruited. Informed consent was waived for this minimal risk study approved by the ethics committee. For adding the objective evidence, the gastrointestinal symptoms and fecal examination results were simultaneously collected and analyzed. It was observed that the incidence of diarrhea in the COVID-19 pneumonia group was significantly higher than that of non–COVID-19 pneumonia and lung tumor groups (both P < .01). In a comparative analysis of fecal examination results, the change of fecal property with accordance to diarrhea was confirmed in the COVID-19 group (all P < .001). The erythrocyte, leukocyte and occult blood (OB) in feces can be used as indirect predictors for gastrointestinal damage. After excluding the critical cases from COVID-19 group, the detection rates of erythrocyte, leukocyte, and OB in feces were not higher than those of the control groups (non–COVID-19 pneumonia, lung tumor, and healthy participants).
For a rigorous analysis, the patients in COVID-19 group was divided into 3 subgroups (76 not severe, 55 severe, and 17 critical cases). No significant difference was found (all P > .05) in the subgroup analysis (severe vs nonsevere, critical vs noncritical, and survivor vs nonsurvivor) of gastrointestinal symptoms, except for anorexia between survivors and nonsurvivors (P = .009). In the subgroup analysis of fecal examination results, the detection rates of leukocytes and OB in feces were only significant different between critical and noncritical group (both P < .001). In the survival analysis, the abnormal results of leukocyte and OB in feces were obviously associated with higher mortality risk (log-rank test, P < .001). Detailed data are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
More than 80% of patients with COVID-19 are noncritical cases.5 The risk for abnormal fecal examination (erythrocyte, leukocyte, and/or OB) results in noncritical COVID-19 may be similar to the baseline status of others lung diseases, but the risk in critical COVID-19 was increased. The appearance of erythrocytes, leukocytes, and OB in feces represented the gastrointestinal damage, and indicated an increased risk of death in case of the exclusion of underlying diseases in the gastrointestinal tract. It is known that gastrointestinal ulcer and bleeding is common in critical patients, especially in those with respiratory failure.6 , 7 High possibility of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critical COVID-19 cases can increase the risk of secondary damage in gastrointestinal tract, resulting in the occurrence of abnormal fecal examination. Meanwhile, the occurrence of gastrointestinal damage can prompt gastrointestinal dysfunction which accelerate the process from multiple organ dysfunction syndrome to death. Consequently, the abnormal fecal examination results may be used as risk factors of mortality in patients with COVID-19, especially for critical cases.
Among the gastrointestinal symptoms relative to COVID-19, diarrhea is confirmed as the most common one. However, it is not sufficient to simply focus on these gastrointestinal symptoms. For gastrointestinal evaluation, a fecal examination is a simple and economic test that may provide valuable information about gastrointestinal damage and prognostic risk.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81600511).
Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org, and at https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.043.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Table 1.
COVID-19 Pneumonia |
COVID-19 |
Non–COVID-19 Pneumoniae |
Lung Tumora |
Healthy Subjectf,g |
P Valueh |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survivor | Nonsurvivor | P Valuem | Nonsevere | Severeb | Criticalc | P valued | ||||||
Age | 56.5 ±15.2 | 72.8 ± 14.1 | <.001 | 52.9 ± 14.9 | 60.3 ± 14.6i | 71.4 ± 13.5j | <.001 | 57.8 ± 15.7 | 56.9 ± 15.7 | 56.9 ± 10.9 | 44.6 ± 12.1j | <.001 |
Sex | ||||||||||||
Male | 59 | 8 | .12 | 32 | 24 | 11 | .237 | 67 | 67i | 43 | 102 | .010 |
Female | 77 | 4 | 44 | 31 | 6 | 81 | 45 | 56 | 146 | |||
Discharge status | ||||||||||||
Survivor | 136 | - | NA | 76 | 55 | 5 | <.001 | 136 | - | - | - | NA |
Nonsurvivor | - | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | - | - | - | |||
Nausea | ||||||||||||
None | 133 | 12 | .999 | 75 | 53 | 17 | .704 | 145 | 110 | 99 | - | .456 |
Yes | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | - | |||
Emesis | ||||||||||||
None | 135 | 12 | .999 | 76 | 54 | 17 | .486 | 147 | 112 | 99 | - | .999 |
Yes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | - | |||
Anorexia | ||||||||||||
None | 115 | 6 | .009 | 61 | 49 | 11 | .067 | 121 | 87 | 99j | - | <.001 |
Yes | 21 | 6 | 15 | 6 | 6 | 27 | 25 | 0 | - | |||
Jaundice | ||||||||||||
None | 135 | 12 | .999 | 75 | 55 | 17 | .999 | 147 | 112 | 99 | - | .999 |
Yes | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | - | |||
Abdominal pain | ||||||||||||
None | 135 | 11 | .156 | 76 | 54 | 16 | .098 | 146 | 112 | 99 | - | .341 |
Yes | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 0 | - | |||
Abdominal distension | ||||||||||||
None | 136 | 11 | .081 | 76 | 55 | 16 | .115 | 147 | 111 | 99 | - | .999 |
Yes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | - | |||
Diarrhea | ||||||||||||
None | 120 | 10 | .641 | 68 | 47 | 15 | .822 | 130 | 109i | 99j | - | <.001 |
Yes | 16 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 3 | 0 | - | |||
Gastrointestinal symptoms | ||||||||||||
None | 101 | 5 | .039 | 55 | 41 | 10 | .445 | 106 | 84 | 99j | - | <.001 |
Yes | 35 | 7 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 42 | 28 | 0 | - | |||
Stool color | ||||||||||||
Yellow | 133 | 7 | <.001 | 74 | 54 | 12j | .001 | 140 | 110 | 97 | 137 | .468 |
Brown | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||
Dark green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Dark red | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Stool property | ||||||||||||
Soft | 124 | 5 | <.001 | 69 | 51 | 9j | .001 | 129 | 84j | 82j | 116j | <.001 |
Half loose | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 20 | 13 | 21 | |||
Loose | 9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | |||
Watery | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Mushy | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Mucoid | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Leukocyte | ||||||||||||
None | 134 | 9 | .004 | 75 | 55 | 13j | .001 | 143 | 111 | 98 | 138 | .096 |
Yes | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
Erythrocyte | ||||||||||||
None | 136 | 11 | .081 | 76 | 55 | 16 | .115 | 147 | 112 | 98 | 138 | .574 |
Yes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
Lipid droplet | ||||||||||||
None | 136 | 12 | NA | 76 | 55 | 17 | NA | 148 | 110 | 93i | 127j | <.001 |
Yes | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |||
Yeast-like fungi | ||||||||||||
None | 136 | 12 | NA | 76 | 55 | 17 | NA | 148 | 105i | 98 | 137 | .001 |
Yes | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |||
Stool OBk | ||||||||||||
None | 112 | 4 | <.001 | 61 | 48 | 7j | <.001 | 116 | 92l | 83 | 188 | .033 |
Weakly positive | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 8 | 9 | |||
Positive | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 13 | |||
Strongly positive | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
COVID-19, coronavirus disease-2019.
Statistical comparison between COVID-19 group and lung tumor group.
Statistical comparison between the nonsevere and severe cases in COVID-19 group.
Statistical comparison between the critical subgroup and noncritical subgroup (mild and severe cases) in patients with COVID-19.
Statistical comparison among the mild, severe, and critical cases in COVID-19 group.
Statistical comparison between COVID-19 group and non–COVID-19 pneumonia group.
There were 248 healthy subjects who received 210 fecal OB tests and 138 stool tests.
Statistical comparison between COVID-19 group and healthy subjects.
Statistical comparison among COVID-19, non–COVID-19 pneumonia, lung tumor and healthy subjects.
P < .01.
P < .001.
Twenty patients with COVID-19 and 1 non–COVID-19 pneumonia patients did not have stool OB test.
P < .05.
Statistical comparison between survivor group and nonsurvivor group.
References
- 1.Nobel Y.R. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:373–375. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wan Y. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:534–535. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30118-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhou Z. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:2294–2297. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization. Available: www.who.int/publications-detail/clinical-management-of-severe-acute-respiratory-infection-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected
- 5.Wu Z. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cook D.J. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:377–381. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ye Z. BMJ. 2020;368:l6722. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]