Abstract
We have recently established a protocol to grow wildtype human oral mucosa organoids. These three-dimensional structures can be maintained in culture long-term, do not require immortalization, and recapitulate the multilayered composition of the epithelial lining of the oral mucosa. Here, we validate the use of this model to study the effect of Leucovorin (LV) on Methotrexate (MTX)-induced toxicity. MTX is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Although effective, the use of MTX often results in severe side-effects, including oral mucositis, which is characterized by epithelial cell death. Here, we show that organoids are sensitive to MTX, and that the addition of LV reduces MTX toxicity, in both a concentration- and timing-dependent manner. Additionally, we show that a 24 hour ‘pretreatment’ with LV reduces MTX-induced cell death, suggesting that such a pretreatment could decrease mucositis in patients. Taken together, we provide the first in vitro model to study the effect of MTX on wildtype oral mucosa cells. Our findings underscore the relevance of the clinically applied LV regimen and highlight the potential of this model to further optimize modifications in dosing and timing of Leucovorin on oral mucosa cells.
Introduction
High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is an important antifolate chemotherapeutic agent used in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. Currently, five-year survival rates of pediatric ALL have reached 90% in developed countries [1–4]. However, patients often suffer from MTX toxicities such as hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hematological malignancies and intestinal and oral mucositis [5]. Despite administration of folinic acid (Leucovorin—LV) after HD-MTX infusion, 20% of patients develop severe HD-MTX-induced oral mucositis leading to chemotherapy delays and an impaired quality of life [5–7]. The development of oral mucositis is a complex process, of which therapy-induced epithelial cell death is one of the main features [8, 9].
After entering the cell (via reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC1), proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT) or membrane folate receptors (MFR)), MTX is polyglutamated (PG) by folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) [10, 11]. This polyglutamation is essential, as it increases intracellular MTX retention and augments its pharmacological activity [12]. MTX-PG inhibits DNA and RNA synthesis via inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), thymidylate synthase (TS) and aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase (AICARTFase), resulting in depletion of intracellular reduced folate levels (see S1 Fig for an overview of MTX transport, metabolism and action) [13]. Ultimately, this results in apoptosis in leukemia cells. However, also healthy cells with a high cell turnover, including the bone marrow and the epithelial lining of the gastrointestinal tract and oral mucosa, are affected by MTX therapy.
LV is a reduced folate that is able to restore purine/pyrimidine biosynthesis after HD-MTX therapy [14, 15]. Clinical guidelines advise to administer LV after HD-MTX to reduce toxicity [16–22]. While it is nowadays generally accepted that LV rescue therapy decreases MTX-induced toxicities such as oral mucositis after MTX administration, the optimal LV dosing- and timing- regimen to reduce oral mucositis rates remains unknown and varies throughout the world.
Although LV rescue therapy was already introduced in the 1960s, preclinical studies have only retrospectively provided a biochemical rationale for the efficacy of this therapy. In mice, a decrease in MTX-induced damage to the jejunal- and oral mucosa was observed after LV administration [23–26]. Importantly, when administered with a time-interval of 12 to 24 hours after MTX, LV did not compromise the anti-leukemic activity of MTX [23–26]. In line with this, a selective mechanism of action for MTX and LV in tumor cells versus normal healthy cells has been proposed. A higher level of MTX-PG was observed in leukemia- and solid tumor cell lines when compared to normal intestinal and bone marrow precursor cells, both in vitro and in vivo [16–22]. In contrast, several pediatric ALL studies [27–30] have suggested that Leucovorin rescue therapy decreases toxicity rates, but might be accompanied by an increased risk of relapse in ALL. This phenomenon has been referred to as the folate ‘over-rescue’ principle, where not only healthy cells, but also tumor cells are rescued. There are no studies that investigate the effect of MTX and LV in healthy human oral mucosa cells and, although valuable, it has been acknowledged that 2D cell lines or mouse models do not always reliably predict the clinical utility of tested therapies [31, 32]. Taken together, there is a need for models that more closely recapitulate the in vivo situation and would allow clinicians and researchers to investigate the effects of altering LV administration regimens on MTX-induced toxicity in healthy mucosal cells.
Organoids are 3D structures grown from stem cells, that recapitulate histological and functional characteristics of their tissue of origin [33]. Since the discovery that organoids could be established from adult stem cells of the mouse gut, organoid technology has quickly evolved [34]. Nowadays, organoids can be grown from many different epithelia [34–46]. These ‘mini-organs’ can be established from both tumor and normal primary patient material with high (60–70%) efficiency. Data supporting the translational potential of this technology is accumulating. For example, in vitro therapy response of tumor organoids was shown to predict the responses of corresponding patients [47–52]. When derived from Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients, organoids were also found to predict patient response in vitro [53] and could be used to find effective therapies for CF patients [54].
Recently, we have described an organoid model derived from healthy oral mucosa [38]. The resulting patient-derived structures consist of a functional stratified squamous epithelium that can be maintained and expanded in culture for over six months. Upon passaging, organoids grown from primary oral mucosa tissue can be broken into smaller fragments, which will proliferate and result in the formation of new organoids. As such, organoid technology allows us to multiply human wildtype epithelial cells for a wide variety of applications, including drug screening. Taken that others have shown that organoids are a proper model for body physiology, we set out to test the potential of different dosing- and timing- regimens of LV in search for the most optimal regimen to ‘rescue’ mucosal toxicity during treatment with HD-MTX in patient-derived oral mucosal organoids.
Methods
Establishment and culture of human organoid lines
Tissue for the generation of organoids from adult normal human oral keratinocytes was obtained from tissue biopsies in the oral cavity during ear/nose/throat surgery. Oral mucosa organoids were generated as previously described [38]. Patient material was collected from pathology material in Advanced DMEM/F12 (Life Technologies, cat.no. 12634–034), supplemented with 1x GlutaMAX (adDMEM/F12; Life Technologies, cat.no. 12634–034), Penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies, cat.no. 15140–122) and 10 mM HEPES (Life Technologies, cat.no. 15630–056). This medium was called +/+/+ medium. In addition, 100 μg/mL Primocin (Invivogen, cat.no. ant-pm1) was added to the +/+/+ medium for tissue collection. The tissue was cut into small fragments. When macroscopically visible, muscle or fat tissue was removed to enrich for the oral epithelium before digestion. Fragments were incubated at 37°C in 0.125% Trypsin (Sigma, cat.no. T1426) in +/+/+ medium until digested (+/- 30 minutes, never longer than 60 minutes). After trypsinization and centrifugation, the resulting pellet was resuspended in ice-cold 70% 10 mg·mL-1 cold Cultrex growth factor reduced BME type 2 (Trevigen, cat.no. 3533-010-02) in organoid medium. Organoid medium contained 1x B27 supplement (Life Technologies, cat. no. 17504–044), 1.25 mM N-acetyl-L-cysteine (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. A9165), 10 mM Nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. N0636), 50 ng/mL human EGF (PeproTech, cat.no. AF-100-15), 500 nM A83-01 (PeproTech, cat. no. 100–26), 10 ng/mL human FGF10 (PeproTech, cat.no. 100–26), 5 ng/mL human FGF2 (PeproTech, cat.no. 100-18B), 1 μM Prostaglandin E2 (Tocris Bioscience, cat.no. 2296), 0.3 μM CHIR 99021 (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. SML1046), 1 μM Forskolin (Bio-Techne R&D Systems, cat.no. 1099), 4% RSPO and 4% Noggin (produced via r-PEX protein expression platform at U-Protein Express BV). Droplets of approximately 10 μl were plated on the bottom of pre-heated suspension culture plates (Greiner, cat.no. M9312). After plating, plates were inverted and put at 37°C for 30 minutes to let the BME solidify and to prevent the cells from attaching to the bottom of the plate. Subsequently, prewarmed organoid medium was added to the plate. For the first passage of the newly established organoid line, 10 μM Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y-27632 (Abmole Bioscience, cat.no. M1817) was added to the medium to aid outgrowth of organoids for the primary tissue. Organoids were split between 7 to 14 days after initial plating. For passaging, organoids were collected from the plate by disrupting the BME droplets with a P1000 and washed in 10 mL +/+/+. The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of TrypLE Express (Life Technologies, cat.no. 12605–010) and incubated at 37°C. Digestion was closely monitored and the suspension was pipetted up and down every 5 minutes to aid disruption of the organoids into single cells. Cells were subsequently resuspended in ice-cold 70% BME in organoid medium and plated at suitable ratios (1:5 to 1:20) to allow efficient outgrowth of new organoids. After splitting, 10 μM Y-27632 (Abmole Bioscience, cat. no. M1817) was always added to aid outgrowth of organoids from single cells. In the experiments, we used organoids from five different donors. Furthermore, we performed drug screens in leukemia cell lines. T cell ALL (MOLT16, HSB2, Jurkat) and B cell ALL (Nalm6, REH) cell lines were obtained from DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany).
Modification of culture conditions for MTX drug screens
For the purpose of this study, organoids were transferred to medium containing a more physiological concentration of folate rather than media with supra-physiological concentrations of folic acid usually present in regular media. We used RPMI 1640 without folic acid (Thermofisher, cat.no. 27016021) supplemented with the same supplements as in organoid medium supplemented with 5 nM folinic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. 47612-250MG; racemic mixture of d- and l-stereoisomer of folinic acid) as sole folate source. This medium was referred to as low folate medium. Medium was changed every 2–3 days and organoids were split once every 1–2 weeks. Organoids were cultured for at least two weeks in this folate-deprived state before starting experiments. All drug screens were performed in this modified, low folate medium.
Growth curves
Organoids were disrupted into single cells using TrypLE digestion. Cells were counted and 20.000 single cells were plated per well in 24-well plates. Per well, 30 μl BME was plated and subsequently cultured as previously described. To assess growth speed of the culture on different media, each organoid line was cultured in parallel in normal and low folate medium. For each timepoint, organoid material was collected in triplicate (three wells). Material was collected by disrupting the BME drop with a P1000 pipet in a 15 mL falcon tube and 3 mL cold +/+/+ medium was added for washing. After centrifugation, supernatant was removed and pellets were stored at -20°C until readout. Material was collected at day 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12 and 14. For readout, pellets were thawed on ice, and 1 mL of PBS/CellTiter-Glo 3D Reagent (Promega, cat.no. G9681) (1v:1v) was added to the pellet. After a 30 minute incubation on a shaker, 100 μl of the lysate was transferred to a black 96 well plate and luminescence readout was performed to assess cell viability.
RNA collection
Cells were cultured for a week after splitting before RNA was collected. Two days after splitting, cells were cultured in the presence of 0.5 μM MTX. For collection, the QIAGEN RNA easy kit (Qiagen, cat. no. 74104) was used according to protocol. In short, pellets were collected in 350 μl RLT buffer. Subsequently, 350 μl 70% ethanol was added and mixed by pipetting up and down before transfer to the RNA binding columns provided in the kit. After washing twice with 500 μl of RPE buffer, and once with RW1, columns were centrifuged at maximal speed for 1 minute to assure that they were dry. Elution was performed by the addition of 30 μl RNAase free water. RNA was stored at -80°C until further use.
cDNA synthesis
For cDNA synthesis, 10.5 μl RNA was mixed with 1 μl 50 μg/ml 110 diluted Oligo(dT) 15 Primer (Promega, cat.no. C1101) and incubated for 5 minutes at 70°C. After that, 8.5 GoScript Reverse Transcriptase mastermix (Promega, cat.no. A5003) was added, consisting of RT buffer, MgCl2, dNTPs, RT and RNase inhibitor according to protocol. Samples were incubated for 5 minutes at 25°C, 60 minutes at 42°C and 15 minutes at 72°C. Samples were stored at -20°C until use.
Immunohistochemistry
Tissues or organoids were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections were subjected to H&E as well as IHC staining, using the antibodies shown in Table 1. Stainings were performed at the pathology department of the UMCU (Utrecht, the Netherlands).
Table 1.
Protein | supplier | Order nr. | Host species | Clone | Lot nr. | Dilution | Antigen retrieval method |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP63 | Abcam | AB735 | Mouse | 4AB | AB735 | 1:800 | Citrate |
KI67 | Monosan | MONX10293 | Mouse | MM1 | 10293 | 1:2000 | Citrate autoclave |
KRT13 | Progen | 10523 | Mouse | 1C7 | 10523 | 1:100 | Citrate |
Quantitative PCR for expression of MTX metabolism genes
For quantitative PCR, IQ SYBR green (Bio-Rad, cat.no. 1708880) was used in a 384-well format. Per well, 7.5 μl SYBR Green was used, mixed with 1 μl 10 μM FW primer and 1 μl 10 μM RV primer, 3 μl cDNA mix and 2.5 μl water. For each reaction, it was estimated that 25 ng of cDNA was loaded. For qPCR, samples were incubated for 2 minutes at 95°C and for 40 cycles at: 15 seconds at 98°C, 15 seconds at 58°C and 15 seconds at 72°C. Results were calculated by using the ΔΔCt method. Expression was calculated relative to expression in tongue tissue (total RNA, human normal tongue tissue, AmsBio, cat.no. R1234267). Melt peak analysis was performed to assure that primer had no aspecific binding. Primers used are described in S4 Table.
DNA isolation
DNA was isolated using Reliaprep gDNA tissue miniprep system (Promega, cat. no. A2052) according to protocol. DNA concentrations were measured using Nanodrop.
Whole exome sequencing
Whole exome sequencing of oral mucosa organoids was previously performed [38]. In this study, these data were reported to show the difference in number of detected mutations in both the normal human organoids used in this study compared to the tumor tissue derived from the same patient to establish that we used normal human organoids here.
LV pretreatment
For LV pretreatment, 24 hours prior to the start of the drugscreen, organoids were exposed to 0.1 μM LV, by replacing the culture media with media containing this concentration of LV. Plates were placed back in the incubator before, 24 hours later, organoids were collected for drug screening as described below.
MTX drug screens (384-well format)
Two days prior to start of the drug screen, organoids were passaged and disrupted into single cells using TrypLE. Single cells were plated in 70% BME in organoid medium. Two days later, when single cells already reformed into small organoids, the organoids were collected from the BME by addition of 1 mg/mL dispase II (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. D4693) to the medium of the organoids. Organoids were incubated for 30 minutes at 37°C to digest the BME. Subsequently, organoids were washed, filtered using a 70 μm nylon cell strainer (Falcon), counted and resuspended in 5% BME/growth medium (12.500 organoids/mL) prior to plating in 40 μl volume (Multi-drop Combi Reagent Dispenser, Thermo Scientific, cat.no. 5840300) in 384-well plates (Corning, cat.no. 4588). As such, 1000 organoids were plated per well. Drugs were added 1 hour after plating the organoids using the Tecan D300e Digital Dispenser (Tecan).
Methotrexate (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. M1000000) was dissolved in DMSO and was used in a concentration range between 5 uM–0.05 uM. Folinic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no. 47612-250MG) was dissolved in PBS containing 0.3% Tween-20, which was required to dispense the drug using the HP printer, and was used at set concentrations of 0.0125 uM–0.025 uM–0.05 uM–0.1 uM. We based our concentration range of MTX based on median MTX plasma level measured in pediatric ALL patients at T48h (0.38 μM, range 0.1–22 μM). The ratio LV:MTX in clinics is around 1:100 (~50 mg/m2: 5000 mg/m2), which was the rationale to focus on a lower range of LV concentrations (for instance 5 μM MTX versus 0.05 μM LV. All wells were normalized for solvent used. DMSO and percentage PBS/Tween-20 never exceeded 1%. Drug exposure was performed in technical triplicate and biological replicates of at least three for each concentration shown. For a lay-out of the drug screen and morphology of the organoid lines during a drugscreen, see S4 Fig.
For folinic acid (Leucovorin–LV) rescue studies, LV was added at different time points after start of MTX incubation. LV was dispensed using the Tecan Dispenser on top of plates previously started on MTX incubation. No medium change was performed (as organoids are in 5% BME, medium removal is impossible) and LV was dispensed into the medium that contained different concentrations of MTX. LV rescue was performed at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours.
120 hours after adding the drugs, ATP levels were measured using the CellTiter-Glo 3D Reagent (Promega, cat.no. G9681) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and luminescence was measured using a Spark multimode microplate reader (Tecan). Results were normalized to vehicle (no drugs—100% cell viability) and baseline control (Staurosporin 1 μM—0% cell viability). IC50 values (= half maximal inhibitory concentration; the concentration at which 50% of cells are dead) were calculated for separate experiments. As a quality check for the performed assays, Z-values were calculated for each individual screen. Screens with Z-values below 0.3 were excluded from analysis (S2 Table).
MTX-polyglutamate analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS
Organoids were plated at a density of 100.000 per 4 mL in a 6-well non-repellent plate (Greiner) in low folate medium. Leukemia cell lines were cultured at a density of 10*106 cells per 20 mL low folate medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Organoids or leukemia cell lines were cultured without MTX or with MTX 0.5 μM. After a 24h incubation, cells were collected and washed twice with 15 mL medium (organoids) or PBS (cell lines). After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in 1 mL, counted and then snap frozen. Before counting organoids, they were incubated at 37°C in 0.125% Trypsin (Sigma, cat.no. T1426) until digested to be able to count single cells. Frozen cell or organoid pellets of 2–3 x 106 cells were thawed and resuspended in 50 μl ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4) (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) by vortexing. Next, 50 μl 13C515N-labeled custom-made stable isotopes of MTX-PG1-7 as internal standard (25 nmol/L) and 100 μl perchloric acid (10% v/v, Sigma-Aldrich cat no. 244252) were added and vortexed immediately. [55] Mixtures were incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 20,160 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Supernatants were quantitatively transferred to an Eppendorf tube and 34 μl 1M phosphate buffer (pH 11.5) was added during vortexing. 100 μl of the mixture was transferred to 0.22 μm spin columns (Merck Millipore Ltd, cat no UFC30GVNB) attached to an LC vial and centrifuged at 3,200 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting eluates were subjected to immediate UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of methotrexate monoglutamate to pentaglutamate (MTX-PG1-5) by injecting 20 μl samples in an Acquity Ultra Performance LC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with a Kinetex 1.7 μm EVO C18 (100 Å, 100 x 2.1 mm) LC column maintained at 40°C. A linear gradient was applied, consisting of solvent A (5% acetonitrile, pH 3.77) and solvent B (55% acetonitrile, pH 3.77). Measurements were performed over total run times of 10 min. The LC system was connected to an AB Sciex 4000 Q Trap tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), which operated in the positive ionization mode with an ion spray voltage of 5.5 kV, collision energy of 40 V, declustering potential of 100 V and collision exit potential of 7 V for all mass transitions. Mass transitions used for the MTX-PG1-5 analytes were as follows; MTX-PG1 (m/z = 455.200>308.200), MTX-PG2 (m/z = 584.2>308.2), MTX-PG3 (m/z = 713.3>308.2), MTX-PG4 (m/z = 842.3>308.2) and MTX-PG5 (m/z = 971.4>308.2), respectively. For the 13C515N-labeled MTX-PG1-5 internal standard, mass transitions used were: m/z = 461.2>308.2, m/z = 590.2>308.2, m/z = 719.3>308.2, m/z = 848.3>308.2 and m/z = 977.4>308.2, respectively. Qualification and integration of the resulting peaks were analyzed with the Analyst software version 1.6.3 (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA), resulting in the peak area under the curve (AUC). Quantification of MTX-PG1-5 concentrations/cell number was performed with the labeled internal standards as described before. [55]
FPGS activity analysis
FPGS catalytic activity analysis in organoids and leukemic cell lines was performed essentially as described by Muller et al [56]. In short, FPGS protein was isolated from organoids and cell lines by sonication (Sonoplus Mini 20; Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) on ice for 2 · 10 seconds (10 second intervals with 90% amplitude and 30-second intervals between samples) in FPGS extraction buffer (50 mM Tris, 20 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM DTT, pH 7.4, 4oC, in MilliQ (MilliQ Advantage A10; Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), followed by centrifugation in an Eppendorf centrifuge (12.000 • g, 15 minutes, 4°C). FPGS-mediated conversion of MTX-PG1 to MTX-PG2 is determined in cell extracts (10–200 μg protein) in a total volume of 250 μL containing final concentrations of 100 mM Tris, 20 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 10 mM ATP, 250 mM MTX-PG1, and 4 mM 15N-labeled L glutamatic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, cat no. 332143-100MG) at a pH of 8.85 (set ith HCl) under atmospheric pressure. After 2 hour incubations at 37oC, quantities of MTX-(15N)PG2 formed were measured by LC-MS/MS as described above [56]. FPGS activity is expressed as pmol MTX-PG2 formed per microgram protein per hour (pmol•μg-1•hr-1)
Data analysis/statistical analysis
Raw luminescence values obtained after readout of MTX drug screens, were normalized to the average of untreated controls (n = 3, 100%) and staurosporin-treated controls (n = 3, 0%), using the formula: (value- 0% control)/(100% control– 0% control)*100%. Resulting percentages of viability were transferred to GraphPad v8 to generate kill curve. Curves were fit using the option ‘log inhibitor vs. normalized response–variable slope. IC50s/AUC values were obtained from GraphPad analysis. The change in IC50 values over time was assessed using a Pearson correlation, performed in Graphpad prism, using XY analysis, correlation option. AUC’s were compared as previously described. [57, 58]
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Collection of human tissues was compliant with the guidelines of the European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) and European and national laws, and written informed consent was obtained from all donors. All donors were > age 18 years. The Biobank Research Ethics Committee of the UMC Utrecht approved the biobanking protocol (12–093 HUB-Cancer).
Results
Human wildtype oral mucosa organoids can be used to model MTX-induced cell death in vitro
Organoid lines used in this study were derived from tumor-adjacent normal epithelium of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (S1 Table). Oral mucosa organoids grew as dense structures consisting of epithelial cells that recapitulate the histological organization of the oral mucosal epithelium in vivo (Fig 1A and 1B). Keeping in mind their origin and the potential risk of cancer cell contamination, wildtype status of the organoids was confirmed by whole exome sequencing. Using normal epithelial tissue as a reference, a low number of mutations was detected in these cultures (two in N1, none in N2), with no mutations found in common cancer driver genes (S2A Fig, S3 Table). To assess if oral mucosa organoids could serve as a model for MTX toxicity, expression of genes involved in MTX transport, metabolism and toxicity was assessed using quantitative PCR (Fig 1C). In addition, catalytic activity of FPGS (important for MTX retention) was compared with that of a reference human T-cell leukemia cell line CCRF-CEM. FPGS activity was >5 times lower in in oral mucosa organoids than in CCRF-CEM cells (501 versus 2715 pmol MTX-PG2/h/mg protein) (S2B Fig).
Oral mucosa organoids were subsequently exposed to MTX. During MTX treatment, MTX polyglutamates (MTX-PG1-5) accumulated intracellularly in oral mucosa organoids in a dose-dependent way (Fig 1D), suggestive of functional MTX metabolism in oral mucosa organoids. Total levels of intracellular MTX-PG differed between organoids derived from different donors, which is in line with the large variation in MTX-PG levels that are detected in patients. MTX-induced cell death was only observed when organoids were cultures in a modified organoid culture medium that contained lower physiological folate levels (Fig 1E), but not the normal organoid culture media (advanced DMEM/F12 containing 6 μM folic acid, 15 μM hypoxanthine and 1.5 μM thymidine). Most likely, when exposed to MTX in this media, these high concentrations prevent MTX toxicity in vitro as previously described [59]. [60, 61]. In this low-folate medium, organoids grew at similar speed and showed similar morphology when compared to the previously defined culture medium (S3A and S3B Fig). Therefore, all subsequent drug screens were performed in low folate medium.
MTX-induced cell death in oral mucosa organoids can be rescued by LV addition, in a timing- and concentration-dependent manner
To assess the role of LV on MTX toxicity, oral mucosa organoids were exposed to a clinically relevant (at levels detected in patient plasma) concentration range of MTX in in vitro drug screens (Fig 2A). The drug screen assays showed high technical quality as measured by Z-scores (median 0.72; range 0.31–0.98, S2 Table). To model LV rescue therapy in vitro, organoids were exposed to different concentrations of LV at different timepoints after the start of MTX treatment.
Administration of LV resulted in a decrease of MTX-induced cell death in a concentration-dependent manner, that was statistically significant (Fig 2B). Secondly, the extent of LV rescue was dependent on the timing of LV addition; the earlier LV was administrated, the higher the overall cell viability (Fig 2C and 2D). LV administration decreased MTX toxicity up to 72 hours after the start of MTX treatment. A correlation between timing of LV administration and MTX IC50 was observed in both N1 and N2 organoids (Fig 2E). Considering the timing of LV administration varies that can vary per treatment protocol, but is usually initiated at timepoints ranging from 24 to 48 hours after MTX infusion, these results are relevant. As in patients, MTX plasma levels have dropped by 54 hours post infusion, LV administration is rarely continued after this timepoint. Here we observe that, in vitro, LV administration still decreases MTX-induced toxicity beyond this timepoint.
A one day pre-treatment of oral mucosa cells with LV prior to MTX exposure, results in potentiation of the LV rescue effect
In patients, MTX-induced oral mucositis most frequently occurs after the first cycle of HD-MTX [62]. This has resulted in the hypothesis that intracellular LV from previous courses prevents toxicity during subsequent MTX courses. To model this in vitro, organoids were exposed to LV one day prior to the start of MTX treatment. At the start of MTX treatment, LV was removed and toxicity was assessed as previously described (Fig 3A). In organoid line N1, LV pre-treatment did not significantly alter the response to MTX (AUC no pre-treatment: 0.8044, AUC pre-treatment 0.8983, t = 1.9169, p = 0.102), although MTX IC50 values marginally increased (Fig 3B and 3C). However, in organoid line N2, a clear rescue effect of the pre-incubation with LV was observed (Fig 3D and 3E), which was also found to be statisctically significant (AUC no pre-treatment: 0.7166, AUC pre-treatment 1.034, t = 10.43, p = 0.0005),. LV pre-treatment increased the viability of N2 organoids when exposed to MTX, for all LV rescue timepoints tested here. When pre-treated, the rescue effect of LV rescue administered at 72 hours—later than currently applied in the clinic—resulted in a cell survival similar to a LV rescue that would have been given at 0 hours without this pre-treatment. This suggests that pre-treatment might increase the timeframe in which LV rescue rescues MTX toxicity in oral mucosa cells.
As variable responses to LV pre-treatment were observed in N1 and N2, the effect of pre-treatment was tested in organoids established from three additional donors. In all three cultures, pre-treatment increased oral mucosa cell survival upon exposure to MTX (Fig 3F). Taken together, we conclude that a one day pre-treatment with LV decreases MTX-induced mucosal toxicity in 4/5 tested donors. This implies that LV pre-treatment may reduce the risk of oral mucositis. Regardless, the effect of such a pre-treatment on leukemia cells much be investigated before any claims can be made on clinical testing of such an intervention.
Effect of MTX and LV therapy on leukemia cell lines
To assess the effect of LV pre-treatment on leukemia cells, both T cell ALL (Jurkat, MOLT16, HSB2) and B cell ALL (Nalm6, REH) cell lines were exposed to MTX, either in the presence or absence of LV pre-treatment (Fig 4A to 4E). Although LV pre-treatment increased MTX IC50 values in the leukemia cell lines tested here, the effect was less pronounced than in oral mucosa cells (Fig 4F).
To estimate the effect of LV pre-treatment when administered systemically, we compared the effect of this treatment on both oral mucosa cells and leukemia cells at a concentration of 0.1 μM MTX (a level reached during plasma measurements of all patients) [62]. At this MTX dose, LV pre-treatment decreases the toxicity of MTX on oral mucosa cells, but does not influence the effect of MTX on 4/5 leukemia cells (Fig 4G). T-ALL cell line Jurkat did show decreased MTX toxicity when exposed to LV pre-treatment. Indeed, it has been previously reported that T-cell ALL is less sensitive than B-cell ALL [63, 64]. Indeed, MTX-PG levels in two B-ALL leukemia cell lines (REH; Nalm6) were around 3-fold higher (S2C Fig) when compared to MTX-PG levels in oral mucosa organoids (S2D Fig). MTX-PG levels in two T-ALL leukemia cell lines (Jurkat; HSB2) differed with high MTX-PG levels in Jurkat cells (~3-fold higher than organoids) and low MTX-PG levels in HSB-2 cells (same range as organoids).
Taken together, we conclude that LV pre-treatment decreases MTX-induced cell death of leukemia cells in vitro. However, as leukemia cells are much more sensitive to MTX than oral mucosa cells, the effect of this pre-treatment might be mitigated at the MTX levels reached during HD-MTX infusions. Regardless, the effect of LV pre-treatment should be explored with caution, but might prove to be an effective approach to decrease the severity and frequency of MTX-indicued mucositis. A local LV application is a feasible alternative, since it would likely not interfere with the systemic MTX effect on leukemia cells and may therefore be a safer approach to reduce the risk of mucositis.
Discussion
Using a 3D in vitro model of primary human oral mucosa organoids, we show donor-dependent MTX-induced cell death in wildtype human oral mucosa cells. To our knowledge, this is the first in vitro model (based on the model described by Driehuis et al [38] with modification in media composition) to assess the effect of MTX on proliferating, wildtype oral mucosa epithelial cells. Using this system, we show that administration of LV at dosages detected in patient plasma, reduces MTX-induced cell death in a concentration- and time-dependent manner and that MTX-induced toxicity shows variability between cells derived from different individuals.
In patients, LV infusion after HD-MTX is usually initiated 36 or 42 hours after HD-MTX, although in some protocols, LV is already applied at 24 hours post MTX infusion. LV rescue therapy is often not administered beyond the timepoint of 54 hours after start of MTX. [65] Based on our findings, we hypothesize that both an earlier start and longer continuation of LV rescue might reduce the incidence or extent of MTX-induced mucositis. However, since the model presented here only studies the effect of such interventions on either mucosal cells or leukemia cell lines, these results need to be validated (for example in mouse models) before they can be clinically tested. Alternatively, a local application of LV one day prior to the start of MTX administration might be an alternative approach to reduce mucositis in pediatric leukemia patients. A local application of LV is currently already applied in some clinics when patients present with oral mucositis after HD-MTX.
To assess the effect of LV pre-treatment on leukemia cells, leukemia-derived cell lines were exposed to the same pre-treatment to study the effect of this intervention on MTX toxicity. Although present, the effect of pre-treatment and LV rescue was less pronounced in leukemia cells than in oral mucosa cells. Differences in response to LV between leukemia cells and healthy cells have been observed before. Several pre-clinical studies showed this selective mechanism of action for MTX and LV might be due to the fact that high MTX-PG levels accumulate in leukemia cell lines compared to normal intestinal and bone marrow precursor cells [14–22]. Also in oral mucosa organoids we found that MTX-PG levels and FPGS activity are lower than in the leukemia cell lines tested here. Taken together, these observations support the fact that primary patient-derived ALL cells (especially B-ALL when compared to T-ALL) are sensitive to MTX due to a high proliferation rate and high FPGS activity and thus might be less affected by LV than oral mucosa cells [22]. However, it is important to test clinical safety of the described interventions in order not to decrease anti-leukemic activity of MTX.
In clinics, only a subset of patients presents with mucositis, suggesting some patients are more sensitive to MTX treatment than others, or might respond better to LV rescue treatment. This is in line with our findings, where organoid cultures derived from different patients, show variable responses to both MTX and LV exposure in vitro. Due to this variable response, more personalized approaches to decrease the risk of MTX-induced mucositis are urgently needed and, in some clinics, already explored. Although beyond the scope of this work, oral mucosa organoids create the opportunity to study the molecular differences between sensitive and resistant cultures. If these inter-patient differences are a consequence of local rather than systemic differences in responses to MTX/LV, such comparisons could help to identify patients at risk, or contribute to the development of alternative treatment strategies to decrease the incidence of oral mucositis.
Here we only study MTX-induced cell death as a model for mucositis. Importantly, oral mucositis is a complex process of which cell death is only one of the hallmarks [8, 66]. In 2004, Sonis et al. proposed a more complicated model of oral mucositis, in which the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and or pro-inflammatory cytokines were also hallmarks of the clinical phenotype in addition to therapy-induced cell death [8]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that the bacterial microbiome might play a role in developing oral mucositis. It would be of interest to study the effect of these factors in future models [8]. Co-cultures of organoids and immune cells or organoids and bacteria have been described [67, 68]. Therefore, this model holds the potential to be extended to investigate the contribution of these factors in oral mucositis.
By making minor adaptations to the culture media that was previously described to culture oral mucosa organoids [38], we have shown that organoids can be used to study MTX-toxicity in vitro. These modifications can be applied to other organoid cultures such as kidney or liver organoids [69, 70]. As such, these models can perhaps be used to study MTX-toxicity that is observed in other organs than the oral mucosa.
Conclusion
Although applied in clinic for many years, the effect of LV rescue therapy to reduce oral mucositis after MTX treatment has not been shown in representative models before. Here, we report the use of normal human oral mucosa organoids that recapitulate functional and histological characteristics of this epithelium to study the potential of LV to reduce MTX-induced toxicity. Oral mucosa organoids show sensitivity to clinically relevant doses of MTX in vitro. MTX-induced toxicity could be reduced by the addition of LV after the start of MTX treatment. The extent of LV-rescue is concentration- and time- dependent and differs between organoids derived from different donors, fitting with what is observed in the clinic. Using this system, we find a pre-exposure (‘pre-treatment’) with LV before MTX treatment significantly potentiates the effect of LV rescue. The effect of this pre-treatment is present, but less pronounced in leukemia cells. Taken together, our findings support the LV rescue protocols currently applied in the clinic and, moreover, highlight the potential of this model to study the effect of modifications of the currently applied clinical regimens, such as a LV pre-treatment, on proliferation wildtype oral mucosa cells in vitro.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Onno Kranenburg, Anneta Brousali, Petra van der Groep, Alexander Constantinides and Anne Snelting of the Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology (U-PORT; UMC Utrecht) for patient inclusion and tissue acquisition. We thank HUB Organoids for help with regulatory affairs regarding informed consent. We would like to thank Sacha Spelier for her help with organoid experiments. We acknowledge Eduard Struys for technical support in FPGS activity and MTX-PG level measurements. We thank the groups of Monique den Boer and Jules Meijerink at the Princess Maxima Center for providing us with leukemia cell lines.
Data Availability
All data are described within the current manuscript as it is.
Funding Statement
Funded by the Oncode Institute (partly financed by the Dutch Cancer Society), by the gravitation program CancerGenomiCs.nl from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and by a Stand Up to Cancer International Translational Cancer Research Grant, a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation administered by the AACR (SU2C-AACR-DT1213) and a ZonMw grant (116.006.103).
References
- 1.Hunger SP, Lu X, Devidas M, Camitta BM, Gaynon PS, Winick NJ, et al. Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(14):1663–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pui CH, Carroll WL, Meshinchi S, Arceci RJ. Biology, risk stratification, and therapy of pediatric acute leukemias: an update. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29(5):551–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kamps WA, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Veerman AJ, Fiocco M, Bierings M, Pieters R. Long-term results of Dutch Childhood Oncology Group studies for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from 1984 to 2004. Leukemia. 2010;24(2):309–19. 10.1038/leu.2009.258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pieters R, de Groot-Kruseman H, Van der Velden V, Fiocco M, van den Berg H, de Bont E, et al. Successful Therapy Reduction and Intensification for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring: Study ALL10 From the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(22):2591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Howard SC, McCormick J, Pui CH, Buddington RK, Harvey RD. Preventing and Managing Toxicities of High-Dose Methotrexate. The oncologist. 2016;21(12):1471–82. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ackland SP, Schilsky RL. High-dose methotrexate: a critical reappraisal. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1987;5(12):2017–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bertino JR. Karnofsky memorial lecture. Ode to methotrexate. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1993;11(1):5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sonis ST. The pathobiology of mucositis. Nature reviews Cancer. 2004;4(4):277–84. 10.1038/nrc1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Villa A, Sonis ST. Mucositis: pathobiology and management. Current opinion in oncology. 2015;27(3):159–64. 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhao R, Diop-Bove N, Visentin M, Goldman ID. Mechanisms of membrane transport of folates into cells and across epithelia. Annual review of nutrition. 2011;31:177–201. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-072610-145133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gonen N, Assaraf YG. Antifolates in cancer therapy: structure, activity and mechanisms of drug resistance. Drug resistance updates: reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy. 2012;15(4):183–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Raz S, Stark M, Assaraf YG. Folylpoly-gamma-glutamate synthetase: A key determinant of folate homeostasis and antifolate resistance in cancer. Drug resistance updates: reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy. 2016;28:43–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao R, Goldman ID. Resistance to antifolates. Oncogene. 2003;22(47):7431–57. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goldman ID, Matherly LH. Biochemical factors in the selectivity of leucovorin rescue: selective inhibition of leucovorin reactivation of dihydrofolate reductase and leucovorin utilization in purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis by methotrexate and dihydrofolate polyglutamates. NCI monographs: a publication of the National Cancer Institute. 1987(5):17–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matherly LH, Barlowe CK, Phillips VM, Goldman ID. The effects on 4-aminoantifolates on 5-formyltetrahydrofolate metabolism in L1210 cells. A biochemical basis of the selectivity of leucovorin rescue. J Biol Chem. 1987;262(2):710–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fry DW, Anderson LA, Borst M, Goldman ID. Analysis of the role of membrane transport and polyglutamation of methotrexate in gut and the Ehrlich tumor in vivo as factors in drug sensitivity and selectivity. Cancer research. 1983;43(3):1087–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fabre I, Fabre G, Goldman ID. Polyglutamylation, an important element in methotrexate cytotoxicity and selectivity in tumor versus murine granulocytic progenitor cells in vitro. Cancer research. 1984;44(8):3190–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Poser RG, Sirotnak FM, Chello PL. Differential synthesis of methotrexate polyglutamates in normal proliferative and neoplastic mouse tissues in vivo. Cancer research. 1981;41(11 Pt 1):4441–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Koizumi S, Curt GA, Fine RL, Griffin JD, Chabner BA. Formation of methotrexate polyglutamates in purified myeloid precursor cells from normal human bone marrow. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1985;75(3):1008–14. 10.1172/JCI111761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matherly LH, Barlowe CK, Goldman ID. Antifolate polyglutamylation and competitive drug displacement at dihydrofolate reductase as important elements in leucovorin rescue in L1210 cells. Cancer research. 1986;46(2):588–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rothenberg SP, Iqbal MP, da Costa M. Effect of folate compounds on the accumulation of methotrexate and the activity of dihydrofolate reductase in liver, kidney and small intestine of the mouse. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1982;223(3):631–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rots MG, Pieters R, Peters GJ, Noordhuis P, van Zantwijk CH, Kaspers GJ, et al. Role of folylpolyglutamate synthetase and folylpolyglutamate hydrolase in methotrexate accumulation and polyglutamylation in childhood leukemia. Blood. 1999;93(5):1677–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldin A, Mantel N, Greenhouse SW, Venditti JM, Humphreys SR. Estimation of the antileukemic potency of the antimetabolite aminopterin, administered alone and in combination with citrovorum factor or folic acid. Cancer research. 1953;13(12):843–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goldin A, Venditti JM, Kline I, Mantel N. Eradication of leukaemic cells (L1210) by methotrexate and methotrexate plus citrovorum factor. Nature. 1966;212(5070):1548–50. 10.1038/2121548a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Berry CL, Germain J, Looker T. The effect of methotrexate on DNA synthesis and its reversal by folinic acid. Journal of embryology and experimental morphology. 1972;28(3):601–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sandberg JS, Goldin A. The use of leucovorin orally in normal and leukemic L1210 mice to prevent the toxicity and gastrointestinal lesions caused by high doses of methotrexate. Cancer research. 1970;30(5):1276–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Borsi JD, Wesenberg F, Stokland T, Moe PJ. How much is too much? Folinic acid rescue dose in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990). 1991;27(8):1006–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wolfrom C, Hepp R, Hartmann R, Breithaupt H, Henze G. Pharmacokinetic study of methotrexate, folinic acid and their serum metabolites in children treated with high-dose methotrexate and leucovorin rescue. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 1990;39(4):377–83. 10.1007/BF00315414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Skarby TV, Anderson H, Heldrup J, Kanerva JA, Seidel H, Schmiegelow K. High leucovorin doses during high-dose methotrexate treatment may reduce the cure rate in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2006;20(11):1955–62. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sterba J, Dusek L, Demlova R, Valik D. Pretreatment plasma folate modulates the pharmacodynamic effect of high-dose methotrexate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: "folate overrescue" concept revisited. Clinical chemistry. 2006;52(4):692–700. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.061150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Pater JL, Seymour L. Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2003;9(11):4227–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johnson JI, Decker S, Zaharevitz D, Rubinstein LV, Venditti JM, Schepartz S, et al. Relationships between drug activity in NCI preclinical in vitro and in vivo models and early clinical trials. British journal of cancer. 2001;84(10):1424–31. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kretzschmar K, Clevers H. Organoids: Modeling Development and the Stem Cell Niche in a Dish. Developmental cell. 2016;38(6):590–600. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459(7244):262–5. 10.1038/nature07935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barker N, Huch M, Kujala P, van de Wetering M, Snippert HJ, van Es JH, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6(1):25–36. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tadokoro T, Wang Y, Barak LS, Bai Y, Randell SH, Hogan BL. IL-6/STAT3 promotes regeneration of airway ciliated cells from basal stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(35):E3641–9. 10.1073/pnas.1409781111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee SH, Hu W, Matulay JT, Silva MV, Owczarek TB, Kim K, et al. Tumor Evolution and Drug Response in Patient-Derived Organoid Models of Bladder Cancer. Cell. 2018;173(2):515–28 e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Driehuis E KS, Spelier S, Lohmussaar K, Willems SM, Devriese LA, de Bree R, et al. Oral mucosal organoids as a potential platform for personalized cancer therapy. Cancer Discov. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kopper O, de Witte CJ, Lohmussaar K, Valle-Inclan JE, Hami N, Kester L, et al. An organoid platform for ovarian cancer captures intra- and interpatient heterogeneity. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):838–49. 10.1038/s41591-019-0422-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.DeWard AD, Cramer J, Lagasse E. Cellular heterogeneity in the mouse esophagus implicates the presence of a nonquiescent epithelial stem cell population. Cell Rep. 2014;9(2):701–11. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huch M, Dorrell C, Boj SF, van Es JH, Li VS, van de Wetering M, et al. In vitro expansion of single Lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by Wnt-driven regeneration. Nature. 2013;494(7436):247–50. 10.1038/nature11826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Karthaus WR, Iaquinta PJ, Drost J, Gracanin A, van Boxtel R, Wongvipat J, et al. Identification of multipotent luminal progenitor cells in human prostate organoid cultures. Cell. 2014;159(1):163–75. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kessler M, Hoffmann K, Brinkmann V, Thieck O, Jackisch S, Toelle B, et al. The Notch and Wnt pathways regulate stemness and differentiation in human fallopian tube organoids. Nature communications. 2015;6:8989 10.1038/ncomms9989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Linnemann JR, Miura H, Meixner LK, Irmler M, Kloos UJ, Hirschi B, et al. Quantification of regenerative potential in primary human mammary epithelial cells. Development. 2015;142(18):3239–51. 10.1242/dev.123554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nanduri LS, Baanstra M, Faber H, Rocchi C, Zwart E, de Haan G, et al. Purification and ex vivo expansion of fully functional salivary gland stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;3(6):957–64. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.09.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ren W, Lewandowski BC, Watson J, Aihara E, Iwatsuki K, Bachmanov AA, et al. Single Lgr5- or Lgr6-expressing taste stem/progenitor cells generate taste bud cells ex vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(46):16401–6. 10.1073/pnas.1409064111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vlachogiannis G, Hedayat S, Vatsiou A, Jamin Y, Fernandez-Mateos J, Khan K, et al. Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Science (New York, NY). 2018;359(6378):920–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, Gogola E, Bounova G, Weeber F, et al. A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):373–86 e10. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ooft SN, Weeber F, Dijkstra KK, McLean CM, Kaing S, van Werkhoven E, et al. Patient-derived organoids can predict response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(513). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Driehuis E, van Hoeck A, Moore K, Kolders S, Francies HE, Gulersonmez MC, et al. Pancreatic cancer organoids recapitulate disease and allow personalized drug screening. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yao Y, Xu X, Yang L, Zhu J, Wan J, Shen L, et al. Patient-Derived Organoids Predict Chemoradiation Responses of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(1):17–26 e6. 10.1016/j.stem.2019.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tiriac H, Belleau P, Engle DD, Plenker D, Deschenes A, Somerville TDD, et al. Organoid Profiling Identifies Common Responders to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(9):1112–29. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Berkers G, van Mourik P, Vonk AM, Kruisselbrink E, Dekkers JF, de Winter-de Groot KM, et al. Rectal Organoids Enable Personalized Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis. Cell Rep. 2019;26(7):1701–8 e3. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dekkers JF WC, de Jonge HR, Bronsveld I, Janssens HM, de Winter-de Groot KM, Brandsma AM, et al. A functional CFTR assay using primary cystic fibrosis intestinal organoids. Nat Med. 2013;19(7):939–45. 10.1038/nm.3201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.den Boer E, Meesters RJ, van Zelst BD, Luider TM, Hazes JM, Heil SG, et al. Measuring methotrexate polyglutamates in red blood cells: a new LC-MS/MS-based method. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2013;405(5):1673–81. 10.1007/s00216-012-6581-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Muller IB, Lin M, Struys EA, Heydari P, Hebing RCF, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Development and validation of a sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS-based method for the analysis of folylpolyglutamate synthetase enzymatic activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: application in rheumatoid arthritis and leukemia patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148(3):839–43. 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29–36. 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rots MG, Pieters R, Kaspers GJ, van Zantwijk CH, Noordhuis P, Mauritz R, et al. Differential methotrexate resistance in childhood T- versus common/preB-acute lymphoblastic leukemia can be measured by an in situ thymidylate synthase inhibition assay, but not by the MTT assay. Blood. 1999;93(3):1067–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.van der Laan BF JG, Kathmann GA, Westerhof GR, Schornagel JH, Hordijk GJ. In vitro activity of novel antifolates against human squamous carcinoma cell lines of the head and neck with inherent resistance to methotrexate. Int J Cancer. 1992;51(6):909–14. 10.1002/ijc.2910510613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jansen G, Mauritz R, Drori S, Sprecher H, Kathmann I, Bunni M, et al. A structurally altered human reduced folate carrier with increased folic acid transport mediates a novel mechanism of antifolate resistance. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(46):30189–98. 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.den Hoed MA, Lopez-Lopez E, te Winkel ML, Tissing W, de Rooij JD, Gutierrez-Camino A, et al. Genetic and metabolic determinants of methotrexate-induced mucositis in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2015;15(3):248–54. 10.1038/tpj.2014.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Galpin AJ, Schuetz JD, Masson E, Yanishevski Y, Synold TW, Barredo JC, et al. Differences in folylpolyglutamate synthetase and dihydrofolate reductase expression in human B-lineage versus T-lineage leukemic lymphoblasts: mechanisms for lineage differences in methotrexate polyglutamylation and cytotoxicity. Molecular pharmacology. 1997;52(1):155–63. 10.1124/mol.52.1.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pauley JL, Panetta JC, Crews KR, Pei D, Cheng C, McCormick J, et al. Between-course targeting of methotrexate exposure using pharmacokinetically guided dosage adjustments. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2013;72(2):369–78. 10.1007/s00280-013-2206-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Van der Beek JN, Oosterom N, Pieters R, de Jonge R, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Heil SG. The effect of leucovorin rescue therapy on methotrexate-induced oral mucositis in the treatment of paediatric ALL: A systematic review. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2019;142:1–8. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sonis ST. Regimen-related gastrointestinal toxicities in cancer patients. Current opinion in supportive and palliative care. 2010;4(1):26–30. 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328335fb76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Blutt SE, Crawford SE, Ramani S, Zou WY, Estes MK. Engineered Human Gastrointestinal Cultures to Study the Microbiome and Infectious Diseases. Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology. 2018;5(3):241–51. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Noel G, Baetz NW, Staab JF, Donowitz M, Kovbasnjuk O, Pasetti MF, et al. A primary human macrophage-enteroid co-culture model to investigate mucosal gut physiology and host-pathogen interactions. Scientific reports. 2017;7:45270 10.1038/srep45270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schutgens F, Rookmaaker MB, Margaritis T, Rios A, Ammerlaan C, Jansen J, et al. Tubuloids derived from human adult kidney and urine for personalized disease modeling. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(3):303–13. 10.1038/s41587-019-0048-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Huch M, Gehart H, van Boxtel R, Hamer K, Blokzijl F, Verstegen MM, et al. Long-term culture of genome-stable bipotent stem cells from adult human liver. Cell. 2015;160(1–2):299–312. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]