Dear Sir,
The recent COVID-19 pandemic caused healthcare system organization twisting in all Countries of the world. In such times, the demand for health care opposed to the difficulties of satisfying it, led to a definitely unique scenario. All procrastinable non COVID-19 care requests had to be rescheduled. Some proctology disorders though, were cause of severe discomfort to patients, and managing them beyond the risk of contagion during visits, was rather distressing. Throughout the first weeks of March, the number of COVID-19 patients in South Italy was still contained, and proctology outpatient clinic was allowed. Only when visiting patients showing respiratory symptoms, physicians were recommended to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) as medical masks, gloves, gowns and googles/face shield. Conversely, no PPE were indicated if patients weren't showing respiratory symptoms [1]. The latter guidelines were appropriate for non suspected COVID-19, nevertheless left a slight sense of unprotection considering the huge quote of asymptomatic or mild symptomatic sick patients that could spread the infection. Subsequently, with the pandemic worsening, outpatient clinics were suspended and implementation of telemedicine into everyday practice become the best solution. Moreover, sharing our experience with proctologic emergencies in times of pandemic, might be useful. During the month of March 2020 (lockdown imposed in Campania march the 9th), 27 patients were remotely diagnosed of acute ano-rectal pain, and any attempt of conservative treatment was made. For 10 patients a medical evaluation became unprocrastinable, after a phone-call triage to deny any flu-like symptoms or contact with positive subjects in the previous two weeks, the patients were finally admitted to be cured. Seven subjects underwent drainage of perineal abscesses, three required excision of thrombosed external hemorrhoid. For all of them, outpatient procedures and local anesthesia was performed, as recommended for proctologic procedures during pandemic [2].Three of these patients subsequently tested by their general doctors for flu and cough occurrence, resulted positive for COVID-19. We were informed at our weekly follow-up phone call. Unfortunately, we were exposed at a high contagion risk with undetected COVID-19 patients, as guidelines did not recommend wearing particular PPE when dealing with asymptomatic subjects. Nevertheless, facing the next phase of the pandemic when visits and surgeries will be gradually reactivated, patients pre-admitting testing appears crucial. Testing all patients is advised, though considering tests sensitivity/specificity [3], and the international tests shortage due to the worldwide massive request, that could affect their availability.
On the verge of phase 2, it is advisable to keep the telemedicine habit when possible, to avoid physical attendance of hospitals and contain contagion; as to reduce healthcare costs, skipping admissions and re-admissions, after the emergency will end [4,5]. Moreover, if tests are not available or in any acute condition necessitating a close contact with patients, given our past experience, we strongly advice to consider every patient as a COVID-19 subject, regardless the presence of symptoms, and to adopt all the possible precautions taken in COVID-19 wards, because providing healthcare personnel protection and reducing contagion will still be imperative in the next weeks.
Provenance and peer review not Commissioned, internally reviewed.
Funding
None.
Author contribution
GG: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study, and in the drafting and editing of the manuscript.
BL: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study, and in the drafting and editing of the manuscript.
GC: Participated substantially in conception, design and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of the data.
TS: Revised it critically and gave final approval of the version to be published.
LFS: Revised it critically and gave final approval of the version to be published.
DGG: Revised it critically and gave final approval of the version to be published.
TG: Revised it critically and gave final approval of the version to be published.
DL: Revised it critically and gave final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor
Brusciano Luigi, MD, PhD.
Data statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
None.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Interim Guidance.
- 2.Hartford L.B., Murphy P.B., Gray D.K., Maciver A., Clarke C.F.M., Allen L.J., Garcia-Ochoa C., Leslie K.A., Van Koughnett J.A.M. The Standardization of Outpatient Procedure (STOP) Narcotics after anorectal surgery: a prospective non-inferiority study to reduce opioid use. Tech. Coloproctol. 2020;24(6):563–571. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02190-0. Epub 2020 Mar 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cohen S.L., Liu G., Abrao M., Smart N., Heniford T. Perspectives on Surgery in the time of COVID-19: safety First [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 3] J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020;S1553–4650(20) doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.003. 30172-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pande R.L., Morris M., Peters A., Spettell C.M., Feifer R., Gillis W. Leveraging remote behavioral health interventions to improve medical outcomes and reduce costs. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2015;21(2):e141–e151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tolone S., Gambardella C., Brusciano L., del Genio G., Lucido F.S., Docimo L. Telephonic triage before surgical ward admission and telemedicine during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Effective and easy procedures to reduce in-hospital positivity. Int. J. Surg. 2020;78:123–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]