Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 May 19;143:109855. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109855

“Therapeutic” facemasks

Deepak Gupta 1
PMCID: PMC7236693  PMID: 32460210

Abstract

There must be pathophysiological reason why “cold” viruses like SARS-CoV-2 show proclivity to nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways which have lower temperature than core body temperature. Henceforth, facemasks’ “therapeutic” role against SARS-CoV-2 must be explored because personal “therapeutic” environments may get created under facemasks due to rebreathing of ~95°F “hot” and ~80% “humid” exhalations which may constantly mitigate SARS-CoV-2 inside nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways.


Correspondence

There must be pathophysiological reason why “cold” viruses like SARS-CoV-2 show proclivity to nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways which have lower temperature than core body temperature [1]. Prior to pyrexia becomes a failing mitigation effort against viremia [2], SARS-CoV-2 induced initial pyrexia may be attempting to contain and delay the progression of viremia. However, abnormally high core body temperature may not be able to raise temperature of nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways to such supranormal level that may contain or delay the “cold” viral progression (replication or shedding) at those anatomic sites. Hereafter, facemasks and cloth face coverings which have some preventative role against SARS-CoV2 transmission may demonstrate “therapeutic” role too [3]. When exhalations approximating at pulmonary capillary blood temperature are re-inhaled under facemasks and cloth face coverings, the temperature of nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways may equalize with core body temperature [4]. Thereafter, the “warming” of nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways may create SARS-CoV-2 containment environments under facemasks and cloth face coverings. Moreover, if Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology report can be extrapolated [5], personal “therapeutic” environments may get created under facemasks and cloth face coverings due to rebreathing of ~ 95°F “hot” and ~ 80% “humid” exhalations [6], [7], which may constantly mitigate SARS-CoV-2 inside nasal cavity, oral cavity, pharyngeal cavity and upper airways. Interestingly, the physiological reason for intolerance to facemasks and cloth face coverings may be due to active and “warm” brain inefficiently dissipating heat across no-longer-cool nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses [8]. Summarily, “therapeutic” facemasks and cloth face coverings role against SARS-CoV-2 must be explored as simple non-pharmacological mitigation technique during COVID-19 pandemic.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109855.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.xml (216B, xml)

References

  • 1.McFadden E.R., Jr, Pichurko B.M. Intraairway thermal profiles during exercise and hyperventilation in normal man. J Clin Invest. 1985;76(3):1007–1010. doi: 10.1172/JCI112052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walter E.J., Hanna-Jumma S., Carraretto M., Forni L. The pathophysiological basis and consequences of fever. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1375-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gupta D. Conscientious objections during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Comm Health. 2020;32(2):231–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roberge R.J., Kim J.H., Coca A. Protective facemask impact on human thermoregulation: an overview. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012;56(1):102–112. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Department of Homeland Security: Science and Technology. S&T’s research, development, testing and evaluation (RDT&E) efforts re COVID-19. April 13; 2020.
  • 6.Cherrie J.W., Wang S., Mueller W., Wendelboe-Nelson C., Loh M. In-mask temperature and humidity can validate respirator wear-time and indicate lung health status. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019;29(4):578–583. doi: 10.1038/s41370-018-0089-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gupta D. (April 24, 2020). Twitter moment. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/andgandg/status/1253804454559784961.
  • 8.Gupta D. Transnasal cooling: a Pandora's box of transnasal patho-physiology. Med Hypotheses. 2011;77(2):275–277. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.xml (216B, xml)

Articles from Medical Hypotheses are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES