Abstract
Lymphoma in HIV-infected patients is AIDS defining. This is the second most common AIDS defining malignancy after Kaposi’s sarcoma. Development of lymphoma in HIV patients is related to immunosuppression and high viral load. Co-infection with other lymphotrophic viruses especially EBV is also strongly associated with development of lymphoma in HIV patients. Despite advances in HAART therapy, incidence of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in HIV-infected patients remains significantly higher than in the general population.
Early diagnosis is challenging due to presence of opportunistic infections and atypical presentation of the lymphoma in this subset of patients. Atypical imaging findings are not unusual, and the diagnosis of lymphoma on imaging is on many occasions unexpected as the patient would ideally be initially investigated for presumed opportunistic infection.
Lymphoma treatment approaches in HIV patients are complicated by comorbidity with opportunistic infections and performance status of the patients. Treatment failure and early relapse are also common in AIDS-related lymphoma. This review article highlights the common and unusual multimodality imaging findings in HIV-associated lymphoma.
Keywords: AIDS-related diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Multimodality imaging of lymphoma, Extranodal lymphoma, HIV and malignancy
Teaching points
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the second most common malignancy in HIV patients.
AIDS-related NHL is an aggressive multisystem disease with a poor prognosis.
CT and FDG PET CT imaging are crucial in initial diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of AIDS-related lymphoma.
Knowledge of imaging features of diffuse features of HIV-associated lymphoma can help to differentiate lymphoma from infectious comorbidities which are common in HIV/AIDS patients.
Introduction
HIV remains a critical health problem; as of 2018, 37.9 million people globally were living with HIV, of which 24.5 million had access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [1]. In 2018, approximately 770,000 people died from AIDS-related illnesses. This represents a significant reduction by more than 56% since the peak in 2004. UNAIDS estimates that approximately $26.2 billion will be required worldwide for the AIDS response in 2020 [1]. As the lifespan of HIV-infected patients is increasing, malignancies now contribute a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is the second most common HIV-related malignancy after Kaposi’s sarcoma [2]. The other AIDS defining malignancy is invasive cervical cancer [3].
Twenty-five to 40% of HIV-positive patients will develop a malignancy; approximately 10% will be non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Since implementation of ART, the risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma initially declined, likely related to improvement in CD4 counts [4, 5]. The risk of developing lymphoma remains higher in those with low CD4 counts and high HIV viral loads [6]. Approximately 75% of the non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in HIV patients is aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Indolent lymphomas comprise less than 10% of HIV-related lymphomas [2, 5].
The pathogenesis of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in HIV is not well understood. Epstein-Barr virus is however known to play an important role [7]. HIV lymphomas are commonly derived from B cells. Immune dysregulation also plays an important role, with progression of lymphoma associated with interleukin 6 and interleukin 10 production. Genetic dysregulation is also a prominent feature in AIDS-related diffuse large B cell lymphoma, notably BCL 6 expression, and Myc overexpression. BCL-2 activation is generally not seen in HIV-related lymphoma.
Imaging in HIV and lymphoma
The imaging findings of NHLs are primarily masses and lymphadenopathy [8, 9]. Extranodal DLBCL is common in the setting of HIV. Most HIV-positive patients have concomitant infectious disease, or are initially evaluated for presumed infectious disease. Initial imaging prior to diagnosis is guided by clinical presentation and index of clinical suspicion.
The primary imaging modality is usually contrast-enhanced CT. Besides the established imaging findings of nodal enlargement in HIV negative patients, other unusual findings are not uncommon in AIDS-related lymphoma. These include necrosis of the involved nodes, large extranodal soft tissue masses, and bone destruction secondary to lymphoma involvement. AIDS-related lymphoma also presents with multi-organ involvement and bulky disease [10]. 18 FDG PET/CT is a useful tool in initial staging and response assessment of lymphoma in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients [11, 12]. The high-grade HIV-associated DLBCLs are more likely to show avid uptake of 18 F-FDG. It is also useful in assessment of sites of FDG avid disease which may not be immediately apparent on conventional CT. PET CT is however inherently limited in tissues which show high background FDG uptake such as the brain.
Lung findings
Pulmonary involvement of diffuse large B cell lymphoma is usually a manifestation of systemic disease rather than primary pulmonary lymphoma [13]. A few isolated case reports of primary pulmonary lymphoma in the setting of HIV have been described. Up to two-thirds of patients present with respiratory symptoms of cough and dyspnea and would therefore be evaluated for an infective process, initially with the chest radiograph and CT chest. On imaging, pulmonary lymphoma can appear as an isolated mass, multiple pulmonary nodules/masses, or diffuse consolidative opacities [14] (Fig. 1). High-grade pulmonary lymphoma in HIV is invariably 18 FDG avid. Patients may also present with pleural effusion.
Gastrointestinal tract findings
Gastrointestinal tract is the most commonly affected extranodal site in AIDS-related NHL and is usually multifocal. The symptoms depend on the site of involvement and range from abdominal pain, diarrhea weight loss, gastrointestinal bleeding, or symptoms related to perforation. In a small series of 48 patients, the stomach and duodenum were the most commonly involved site. Bowel involvement presents as soft tissue bowel thickening, typically with associated dilatation rather than narrowing of the bowel lumen (Fig. 2), due to involvement of the myenteric plexus [15]. There is usually associated mesenteric lymphadenopathy. Some patients may also present with ascites.
Liver and spleen
Liver and spleen involvement are not uncommon in AIDS-related lymphoma. This can either be focal or diffuse involvement, with hepatosplenomegaly and focal masses on imaging. These appear as hypoattenuating focal lesions which do not show any significant enhancement on all phases. Additionally, the masses typically encase but do not invade the hepatic vasculature or biliary tree [16]. Absence of significant arterial phase enhancement, vessel penetration sign, and absence of vascular thrombosis are useful clues in diagnosing lymphoma [17] (Fig. 3). In severely immunocompromised lesions, the hypoattenuating focal lesions may demonstrate ring enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and can easily be confused with tuberculous or fungal microabscesses (Figs. 3 and 4). FDG PET CT may demonstrate avid focal deposits within these organs. In the absence of a focal lesion, diffusely increased FDG uptake within the spleen, higher than the liver background, is considered diffuse involvement of the spleen (Fig. 1). It should be noted that diffuse splenic FDG uptake can also be reactive. This is especially important in patients on chemotherapy.
Other solid organs
HIV-associated lymphoma can rarely involve the kidneys, pancreas, and adrenal glands. The incidence of pancreatic involvement has been reported to be up to 5% in HIV patients [18]. The kidneys have no intrinsic lymphoid tissue, and their involvement therefore signifies disseminated disease [8]. On imaging, infiltrative masses tend to be hyperattenuating to the renal parenchyma on the unenhanced CT which can be a useful clue. Lymphomatous infiltration also commonly occurs along the renal capsule and sinus [19] (Fig. 5).
Bone findings
Bone involvement occurs in approximately 5% of disseminated lymphoma cases although this may be higher in HIV. Imaging appearances are nonspecific and range from both mixed lytic and sclerotic lesions and extensive soft tissue involvement [16, 17] (Fig. 6). Evaluation for soft tissue involvement is critical as the isolated bone findings may mimic osteomyelitis. Differential diagnoses also include Ewing’s sarcoma which could present with bone destruction and associated soft tissue component.
Role of imaging during treatment of HIV-associated DLBCL
Despite advances in HAART and chemotherapy, HIV-associated DLBCL carries a poor prognosis related to the HIV disease and aggressive nature of the lymphoma. The standard therapy is CHOP chemotherapy regimen, with or without rituximab (R-CHOP). Previous studies before rituximab recorded complete response rates of 30–50% and 2-year survival rates of less than 20% [23]. Although rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of CD20-positive lymphomas in the HIV-negative population, its role in HIV-related lymphoma is not as clearly defined, given the profound cellular and humoral immunodeficiency that this agent can cause [24]. Many authors suggest the addition of rituximab to the treatment regimen if the CD4 count is over 50/mL and individualized consideration for patients with CD4 less than 50 [25]. Imaging is crucial in assessing response to treatment. An interim PET/CT is useful in assessment of treatment response.
Posttreatment surveillance
Current evidence shows no clinical benefit of surveillance imaging [20, 21], although this is routinely offered to patients in an effort to detect recurrence before the onset of clinical symptoms when patients are more likely to accrue maximal benefit from salvage treatment. In the clinical setting, most patients are evaluated with CT during surveillance. Imaging with PET CT is not recommended for posttreatment surveillance due to high false positive rates. The false positive rates could even be higher in HIV patients due to some opportunistic infections which may have presentation similar to that of lymphoma. Disease recurrence is higher in HIV-positive patients than HIV negative patients. This may be attributable to initial bulk disease, persistent immune dysregulation, and suboptimal treatment in this subset of patients. Recurrence can either be at the site of primary disease or in distant sites. Imaging strategy should therefore be guided by clinical presentation and the degree of clinical suspicion (Figs. 7, 8, 9, and 10).
Conclusion
Imaging is valuable for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of AIDS-related lymphomas and facilitates staging and monitoring of therapeutic effects. However, there can be atypical imaging features of AIDS-related DLBCL compared to findings in HIV-negative patients. Knowledge of these atypical imaging features may facilitate the diagnosis of lymphoma over infectious disease in the setting of HIV/AIDS.
Acknowledgements
Dr. Ann Mwirigi, Dr Sitna Ali, Prof Malkit Riyat, AKUH Nairobi
Abbreviations
- AIDS
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
- BCL
B cell Lymphoma
- CECT
Contrast-enhanced CT
- CT
Computed tomography
- DLBCL
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
- EBV
Epstein-Barr virus
- FDG
Fluorodeoxyglucose
- HAART
Highly active antiretroviral therapy
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- NHL
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
- PET
Positron emission tomography
- R-CHOP
Rituximab, cyclophosphamide doxorubicin, vincristine (Oncovin), and prednisone
Authors’ contributions
Both authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
None
Availability of data and materials
Available
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval by the Aga Khan University ethical review committee for publication of this educational material. A waiver of consent to use patient images was granted as no patient identifiers were used.
Consent for publication
Granted
Competing interests
No competing interests
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2019 fact sheet. Available via: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet.
- 2.Kaplan LD, Ai W (2019) AIDS-related lymphomas: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathobiology. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/hiv-related-lymphomas-epidemiology-risk-factors-and-pathobiology. Accesed 14 Oct 2019.
- 3.Javadi Sanaz, Menias Christine O., Karbasian Niloofar, Shaaban Akram, Shah Komal, Osman Adam, Jensen Corey T., Lubner Meghan G., Gaballah Ayman H., Elsayes Khaled M. HIV-related Malignancies and Mimics: Imaging Findings and Management. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(7):2051–2068. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carbone A, Gloghini A. AIDS-related lymphomas: from pathogenesis to pathology. Br J Haematol. 2005;130(5):662–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vishnu P, Aboulafia DM (2012) AIDS-related non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Adv Hematol 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Cobucci RNO, Lima PH, de Souza PC, Costa VV, de Mesquita Cornetta MDC, Fernandes JV, et al. Assessing the impact of HAART on the incidence of defining and non-defining AIDS cancers among patients with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dolcetti Riccardo, Gloghini Annunziata, Caruso Arnaldo, Carbone Antonino. A lymphomagenic role for HIV beyond immune suppression? Blood. 2016;127(11):1403–1409. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-681411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Powles T, Matthews G, Bower M. AIDS related systemic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Sex Transm Infect. 2000;76(5):335–341. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.5.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shah Hina J., Keraliya Abhishek R., Jagannathan Jyothi P., Tirumani Sree Harsha, Lele Vikram R., DiPiro Pamela J. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Era of Precision Oncology: How Imaging Is Helpful. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2017;18(1):54. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang J, Wang P, Lv Z-B, Wei L-G, Xu Y-L, Zhou A, et al. AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma: imaging feature analysis of 27 cases and correlation with pathologic findings. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(18):7769–7773. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.18.7769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kulkarni NM, Pinho DF, Narayanan S, Kambadakone AR, Abramson JS, Sahani DV. Imaging for oncologic response assessment in lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(1):18–31. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Müeller SP, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3048. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Karpel JP. Overview of pulmonary disease in people who inject drugs. UpToDate Waltham, MA: UpToDate, Inc https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-ofpulmonary-disease-in-people-who-inject-drugs Updated August. 2019;5.
- 14.Eisner MD, Kaplan LD, Herndier B, Stulbarg MS. The pulmonary manifestations of AIDS− related non− Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Chest. 1996;110(3):729–736. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.3.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Renn A, Kazmi F, Khan N, et al (2017) The HIV manifestations within the gastrointestinal tract: a pictorial review. SA J Radiol 21(2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Restrepo CS, Lemos DF, Gordillo H, Odero R, Varghese T, Tiemann W, et al. Imaging findings in musculoskeletal complications of AIDS. Radiographics. 2004;24(4):1029–1049. doi: 10.1148/rg.244035151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thomas Adam G., Vaidhyanath Ramachandran, Kirke Rathy, Rajesh Arumugam. Extranodal Lymphoma From Head to Toe: Part 1, The Head and Spine. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;197(2):350–356. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.7266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fujinaga Yasunari, Lall Chandana, Patel Aashish, Matsushita Tsuyoshi, Sanyal Rupan, Kadoya Masumi. MR features of primary and secondary malignant lymphoma of the pancreas: a pictorial review. Insights into Imaging. 2013;4(3):321–329. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0242-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Townsend RR. CT of AIDS-related lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(5):969–974. doi: 10.2214/ajr.156.5.2017962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thompson CA, Ghesquieres H, Maurer MJ, Cerhan JR, Biron P, Ansell SM, et al. Utility of routine post-therapy surveillance imaging in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cohen JB, Kurtz DM, Staton AD, Flowers CR. Next-generation surveillance strategies for patients with lymphoma. Future Oncol. 2015;11(13):1977–1991. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Available