Letter to the Editor,
There is an urgent need to understand the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome - Coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Recent reports suggest that SARS-CoV-2 fails to induce significant amounts of interferon (IFN) in tumour tissue explant cultures [1] and in in vitro cell and animal models [2], the latter specifying that IFN expression may however be obtained at high multiplicity of infection. Since IFNs are known to play a key role in the response to viral infections, the aforementioned low ability of SARS-CoV-2 to induce all IFN types is significant from a pathogenetic point of view and such failure may be one of the keys to explaining the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Indeed, it has been proposed that the lack of induction of significant amounts of all types of IFN may influence the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 load in nasopharyngeal secretions [1], possibly explaining the high transmissibility of the infection, and that a reduced innate antiviral defence is associated with elevated inflammatory cytokine production [2]. The above data has led to the conclusion that the use of exogenous IFN to stimulate antiviral immunity might be successful for treating SARS-CoV-2 infection [3]. All the above results await interpretation from the perspective of infection pathophysiology, considering the recent finding on IFN-induced expression of ACE2 receptor [4].
It is our firm opinion, however, that further observation is required before drawing general conclusions about the lack of induction and production of IFNs in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indeed, in the framework of a project addressing the pathogenesis of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, we were able to detect type I IFN genes (IFN alpha and omega), but not type II IFN genes (IFN-gamma), in pelleted cells from oropharyngeal and/or nasopharyngeal swabs of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Sapienza University Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I” in Rome, Italy.
Specifically (see Table 1 and the relative methods), type I IFN genes were detected in 47 out of 50 patients who were COVID-19-diagnosed by RT-PCR (RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 Altona Diagnostic – Germany) after RNA extraction (QIAamp® Viral RNA - Qiagen) of samples taken from oropharyngeal and/or nasopharyngeal swabs. The producing cells have not been characterized, but we believe that the data have added value since they were obtained in ex vivo experiments directly from COVID-19 patients and not from experiments performed on explanted tumour cells [1] or on cellular lines/animal model [2].
Table 1.
Genes | Ct <40* | % | 2−ΔΔCt** |
---|---|---|---|
IFN-alpha | 47/50 | 94.0 | 4.13 (1.22–31.29) |
IFN-omega | 47/50 | 94.0 | 7.92 (1.30–219.18) |
IFN-gamma | 0/50 | NA | NA |
Data are expressed as number (percentage) of COVID-19 patients (n = 50) with Ct values lower than 40.
IFN expression data were calculated using 2−ΔΔCt method. Each IFN raw Ct value was tagged as undetermined when fell between levels of 40 and 45. Raw Ct values were normalized using the endogenous control (β-glucuronidase) according to the equation: ΔCtIFN = CtIFN - CtGUS. Differences between patients and healthy donors (n = 10) were calculated based on the ΔΔCt measure, where ΔΔCtIFN = ΔCtSARS-CoV-2 – mean (ΔCtHealthyDonors). Expression of IFNs and housekeeping genes mRNAs were evaluated using RT/Real Time PCR [7]. Data are expressed as median (range).
Although we do not currently know whether or what type or subtypes of IFN are produced in respiratory secretions and whether the IFNs subtypes we have detected display a beneficial or detrimental effect on the natural history of COVID-19 [5], we strongly believe that, in light of the data or comments recently reported by Chun [1], Blanco-Melo D [2], and O’Brien [3] and the number of active clinical treatment trials with IFNs now underway [6], it is urgent and critically important to deliver data indicating that an IFN response (at least type I IFN) does exist in the respiratory tract of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.
Declaration of Competing Interest
None.
Acknowledgements
There is no funding for this work. We would like to thank the COVID-19 ViroInfection Study Group of Sapienza University.
References
- 1.Chu H., Chan JFW Wang Y. Comparative replication and immune activation profiles of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV in human lungs: an ex vivo study with implications for the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;(April) doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa410. ciaa410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blanco-Melo D., Nilsson-Payant B.E., Liu W.C. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.O’Brien T.R., Thomas D.L., Jackson S.S. Weak induction of interferon expression by SARS-CoV-2 supports clinical trials of interferon lambda to treat early COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;(April) doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa453. ciaa453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ziegler C.G.K., Allon S.J., Nyquist S.K. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 is an interferon-stimulated gene in human airway epithelial cells and is detected in specific cell subsets across tissues. Cell. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scagnolari C., Antonelli G. Type I interferon and HIV: subtle balance between antiviral activity, Immunopathogenesis and the microbiome. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2018;40:19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2018.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sanders J.M., Monogue M.L., Jodlowski T.Z., Cutrell J.B. Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) - A Review. JAMA. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pierangeli A., Viscido A., Bitossi C. Differential interferon gene expression in bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus-A genotype ON1. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020;209(1):23–28. doi: 10.1007/s00430-019-00633-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]