Abstract
Disordered homopolymeric regions of single-stranded RNA, such as U or A tracts, are found within functional RNAs where they play distinct roles in defining molecular structure and facilitating recognition by partners. Despite this prominence, details of conformational and biophysical properties of these regions have not yet been resolved. We apply a number of experimental techniques to investigate the conformations of these biologically important motifs, and provide quantitative measurements of their ion atmospheres. Single strands of RNA display pronounced sequence dependent conformations that relate to the unique ion atmospheres each attracts. Chains of rU bases are relatively unstructured under all conditions, while chains of rA bases display distinct ordering, through stacking or clustering motifs, depending on the composition of the surrounding solution. These dramatic structural differences are consistent with the measured disparity in ion composition and atmospheres around each homopolymer, revealing a complex interplay of base, ion and single-strand ordering. The unique structural and ionic signatures of homopolymer ssRNAs explains their role(s) in folding structured RNAs, and may explain their distinct recognition by protein partners.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
RNAs play critical and diverse roles in biology, acting as catalysts, translational switches, gene silencers and protein templates 1–4. More functions await discovery. This astonishing diversity is due in large part to the wide structural variation of RNA molecules. RNA’s conformational richness is surprising, given the limited number of building blocks available: four chemically similar nucleotides and modifications. This number is striking when juxtaposed against the twenty, chemically diverse amino acid constituents of proteins 5.
With simple, four-letter sequences, how can these molecules assume structures that facilitate such a wide variety of biological function? The answer lies in the numerous interactions within or between RNA elements. These interactions include stacking of nucleotide bases, as well as the different possible orientations of the sugar-phosphate backbone. Beyond sequence, the local cellular environment (ions, metabolites, crowding agents) also contributes to determine RNA’s conformations. Of particular importance is the association of ions to the nucleic acid, notably divalent Mg2+ 6–8. Past studies of RNA folding provide compelling evidence of the essential roles that Mg2+ plays in guiding RNA structures across a rough folding landscape 9–14. Given this intimate connection, a few investigations have begun to link quantifiable properties of the ion atmosphere with structural insights in both model systems and more complex RNAs 15,16.
Despite the awareness and appreciation of Mg2+’s roles in creating RNA structures, the field still lacks a quantitative measurement linking ion association to the conformations of the most fundamental RNA elements: single-stranded chains. Interactions with Mg2+ are known to persist even in these basic elements, and are critical for organizing biologically important single-stranded regions such as the actuators of riboswitches, the disordered tails of ribozymes that bind substrates, and A-tracts in complex ribozymes that harbor localized ions 17–20. The precise modes of Mg2+ interaction with ssRNA have not yet been elucidated.
To date, investigations of the ion-dependent conformations of ssRNA look to structural signatures obtained through methods such as NMR, FRET, SAXS and pulling experiments (e.g. 21–29). Modes of interactions between ions and these flexible polymers have emerged through comparison of predictions of conventional polymer theories (e.g. worm-like chain models) with measurements of the polymers’ elastic properties. Our own prior studies of ssNA persistence lengths25, and others show that modified theories are required to accurately predict the ion induced modulation of chain properties. The sophisticated models required to accurately describe ion-polymer interactions, such as snake-like chain and internal electrostatic tension models, hint at complicated associations between RNA polymers and the localized ions that surround them23,30. Further refinement and understanding of these interactions would be greatly enhanced by direct measurements of the ion cloud around ssRNA.
In spite of this, ion atmosphere measurements for ssRNA elements are sparse, with only a few experimental investigations directly probing a relatively small region of space, usually quantifying a single aspect of the problem (e.g. ion number)31. While these studies successfully elucidate elastic and dynamic properties of ssRNA, no quantitative link has been established between the ion cloud and the conformations of these elements. Theoretical alternatives have been greatly advanced, with recent success in predicting ion numbers around static nucleic acid structures13,32–36. However more experimental data are needed to fully describe the ion atmosphere around highly flexible systems such as single-stranded elements.
Here, we apply a wide range of biophysical methods to elucidate both the ionic and structural signatures of two distinct RNA homopolymer chains. Together with advances in data analysis, these state of the art biophysical tools allow us to rigorously determine the electrostatic properties and conformations of these flexible RNA elements. We selected chains of 30 U nucleotides, rU30, and contrast their conformations with those of rA30, containing A nucleotides. Past work suggests these sequences have disparate characteristics and display a wide variation of arrangements 22,28,37–42. Additionally, the presence of these particular sequences within functionally distinct RNAs, e.g. U-tracts in long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) and A-tails in messenger RNAs (mRNAs), hints that nature exploits their unique structural signatures.
Our in-depth investigation provides information essential for structural studies of RNA by correlating the ion atmosphere around ssRNA with the conformations it assumes. The differing affinity of each base (A vs. U) for Mg2+ is reflected in both local (base arrangement) and global (backbone screening) chain conformations. The stacking affinity of A vs U provides another critical degree of variation for both the structure and ion cloud. The interplay of these interactions grant differing sequences unique ion atmosphere and conformational signatures, a theme central to both generic RNA folding and biological interactions.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
A detailed description of all work (methods and data analysis) is given in the Supporting Information (SI), here we briefly outline the methods employed.
Sample preparation
All RNA samples (rU30 and rA30) were purchased (deprotected) from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA). 25bp DNA was purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). All samples were annealed and buffer exchanged in the appropriate solution conditions before experiments as described in the SI.
Precipitation experiments
UV absorption spectra were measured using a Cary 50 spectrophotometer. The optical density at 260nm was used to report on stabilization or precipitation of RNA samples. Data in Figure 1 was normalized for each series (construct and salt series) by dividing all absorption measurements by the maximum measured for those conditions.
CD experiments
Spectra were acquired using a BioLogic MOS 450 in CD mode. The CD spectra were scaled to account for differing nucleic acid concentrations, and further adjusted to match at 300nm to allow comparison of the peak positions across solution conditions.
SAXS experiments
SAXS experiments were performed at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron source (CHESS) beamline G1. Multiple sample concentrations were used for each experiment condition (molecule and salt condition) to control for interparticle interference effects, and provide second virial measurements. The radius of gyration (Rg) for each experimental condition was calculated using the Guinier approximation on the zero-concentration extrapolated SAXS curves,
(1) |
were I(q) is the scattered intensity as a function of scattering vector q. The second virial coefficients (B2) were calulcated from SAXS profiles of the same molecule in a given condition at varying nucleic acid concentration (c), using the following,
(2) |
Where A is defined such that the sample concentration c is in units of M, and B2 in Å 3. The form factor S(q,c=0) is determined by fitting the low-q portion of the zero concentration SAXS curve to an analytical form expected for a random coil,
(3) |
a,b and d are fit parameters
The SAXS data interpreted in this paper, as well as a representative set of model structures for each condition, have been deposited in the SASBDB under accession codes: SASDFA9, SASDFB9, SASDFC9, SASDFD9, SASDFE9, SASDFF9, SASDFG9, SASDFH9, SASDFJ9, SASDFK9, SASDFL9, SASDFM9, SASDFN9, SASDFP9, SASDFQP, SASDFR9, SASDFS9.
Ion counting experiments
Concentrations of the counter ions (Na+, Mg2+) and nucleic acids (through measurement of phosphorus (P) concentrations) were determined using an Optima 7300DV ICP-AES (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) within the linear detection range of the instrument. Parts per million concentrations of each were converted to excess ions per phosphate as described in SI. Ion counting data represent the mean over 12 measurements, while the uncertainties are given as the standard error in the mean.
Modelling from SAXS Data
Methodology for ssNA structure building and refinements based on the SAXS data is extensively described in 43. Minor changes to this procedure were made to model ssRNA, as outlined in the SI. Structural parameters from the derived models were calculated as described in SI.
The orientation correlation function (OCF) was calculated by,
(4) |
Where is the normalized bond vector between the ith and (i+1)th phosphate in a given nucleic acid chain. The average dot product between these bond vectors is computed as a function of the number of monomers separating the phosphates (|i-j|). The correlation lengths, lOCF, were calculated using the following formula,
(5) |
where b is the mean phosphate-phosphate distance. See SI section ‘Chain parameter calculations’ for a clear illustration of these quantities.
A representative set of structures for each of the modelled conditions is provided with the SASBDB entries. Furthermore, the complete structure sets analyzed herein are available as SI.
RESULTS
Precipitation reveals disparity in solution stability
We first used UV absorption measurements to investigate the effect of mono and divalent ions on ssRNA stability (see Methods and SI). Stabilization of base-stacking interactions leads to small decreases in UV absorption, while ion induced precipitation leads to dramatic decreases as strengthening inter-chain interactions render the sample insoluble (e.g. 44–46). Changes in absorption at 260nm, monitored as a function of increasing salt, therefore serve as indirect probes of the ion-RNA interactions of a given sequence.
As shown in Figure 1, both ssRNA constructs show no significant changes in absorption as the bulk concentration of Na+ increases. Chains of both rU and rA nucleotides therefore remain soluble in solutions containing monovalent ions over a broad concentration range. Although the effect of added Mg2+ on rU30 cannot be readily distinguished from that of added NaCl, dramatic changes are measured in the rA30 sample. The drop in absorption becomes severe above 5 mM MgCl2, suggesting the onset of precipitation rather than stabilization of stacked conformations. The contrast between poly rU and poly rA reflects interaction with Mg2+, in agreement with past work by others who report distinct effects consistent with base specific, ion dehydration 41. These straightforward absorption experiments already highlight the interplay between sequence and ions in disordered ssRNA.
Circular Dichroism (CD) measurements probe local chain ordering
To provide additional information about chain ordering in each solution condition, we performed circular dichroism (CD) measurements under ionic conditions that support a large soluble fraction in the absorption experiments (see Methods and SI). CD spectra report on the helical ordering present in a sample, and serve as a useful reporter for the formation of exotic structures, such as quadruplexes 47. Unlike the case of proteins, where a quantitative assessment of specific secondary structural elements can be retrieved from the CD amplitudes48, it is currently unclear how to interpret changing CD amplitudes for RNA. We therefore restrict our interpretation of CD signals to qualitative features representing repeating structural elements.
We find (Figure 2) distinct peaks in the CD signals, with amplitudes and positions that vary with construct and salt. This behavior reflects differences in helical ordering of each sequence. The relatively flat, featureless spectrum of the rU30 sample suggests no persistent helical ordering; the peaks originate from generic nucleic acid base asymmetry 49. In contrast, the pronounced peaks in the spectrum of the rA sample are consistent with those measured in a poly rU:rA duplex 50, suggesting a largely A-form conformation. The peaks do not shift appreciably in either sample, as ionic conditions change, indicating the absence of more complex structures under the conditions probed.
SAXS quantifies differences in chain conformations
To further investigate the structural differences that accompany or seed the previously observed precipitation effects, we applied a solution scattering method that is sensitive to the conformational properties of (disordered) structural ensembles: small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS, see Methods and SI). SAXS measurements were performed across [Mg2+] conditions that maintain sample solubility, and at [Na] that are expected to provide the same degree of phosphate screening (about 100 times higher 51,52, SI, Table S1).
A radius-of-gyration (Rg) is readily extracted from SAXS data under each solution condition, roughly reporting the mean global size of the chains (SI, Table S2, Figs. S1–S4). The Rg of both sequences (Figure 3a) decreases with increasing salt concentration, representing a molecular collapse as repulsive interactions between chain phosphates are screened. Despite the tendency for both sequences to become compact with increasing salt, differences are detected: at the lowest ionic strengths, rA30 is on average ‘smaller’ than rU30, and the sequences have different responses to ion type. The rU chain shows no strong Rg dependence across steps of equivalent ionic strength, e.g. the Rg’s measured in 100 (or 200) mM Na+ and 1 (or 2) mM Mg2+ appear equivalent. We also note the similarity in global size of both constructs at high [NaCl], whereas across all probed [MgCl2], rA30 is consistently smaller than rU30. These differences in global size are consistent with previous reported measurements53,54.
A more intricate picture of conformations can be gleaned by examining higher-angle portions of the scattering profiles that capture structural variations on smaller length scales. We highlight this regime using Kratky plots that emphasize scattering into larger scattering angles (Figure 3b). For clarity, only the first two ionic concentrations are displayed for both constructs (for the full series see SI, Figs. S5). We observe only subtle changes in chain conformations for either construct when titrating Na+. A gently tipping high-q tail is paired with a rising mid-q peak, consistent with shape changes expected from a non-specific chain collapse 55,56. The more subtle changes in rU30 with increasing salt concentrations appear to depend mainly on screening efficacy; as in the Rg measurements, a factor of 100 between Na+ and Mg2+ concentrations yields nearly identical profiles. The most drastic changes can be seen in rA30 conformations. At all concentrations of MgCl2, profiles appear almost identical to each other, but differ substantially from measurements in Na+. Thus, for poly rA, chain conformations are more sensitive to ion identity than screening efficacy.
Ion atmosphere measurements reveal sequence specific ion interactions
The disparity in structural and solution properties of ssRNAs as a function of [Na+] and [Mg2+] suggests sequence specific ion interactions and screening effects. The electrostatic environment around the RNAs can be quantified by measuring both the degree of inter-chain screening, and the composition of the ion atmosphere at a given ionic condition 8.
The degree of screening between chains is revealed through the second virial coefficients (B2), which quantify interchain interactions 57,58. By examining the low q portion of the SAXS profiles at the same ionic condition, but at varying nucleic acid concentrations, inter-chain effects can be quantified and used to compute B2 (see Methods, SI and Figs. S6–S22). This inter-chain interaction is highly dependent on the bulk ion composition and screening efficacy of the ionic cloud surrounding each RNA. While second virial coefficients require careful extrapolation from the SAXS data, and are inherently more uncertain than directly derived parameters (e.g. Rg), a thermodynamic quantification of polymer-polymer screening is valuable, and hard to otherwise determine. Positive values of B2 indicate repulsion between chains, while negative values signal attraction. The second virial coefficients for ssRNA, shown in Figure 4, provide valuable information about the screening of disparate sequence RNAs.
At the lowest ionic strength probed, strong chain-chain repulsion dominates both constructs, resulting in large (positive) values of B2. This value decreases for both sequences as we increase either [Na+] or [Mg2+], likely a result of the decrease in screening length of the higher ionic strength solutions. In both constructs however, the degree of chain-chain screening is lower for the Mg2+ conditions than the corresponding Na+, when scaled by the factor of 100 that provides agreement of the rU30 SAXS profiles. If we assume Debye screening, interchain repulsion depends only on the valence and concentration of the ions in solution. Therefore, it is not surprising that higher concentrations of Na+ are more effective than lower concentrations of Mg2+ in reducing interparticle repulsion. Interestingly, less repulsion is measured in poly rU in 100 (or 200) mM Na+ than in 1 (or 2) mM Mg2+, despite their identical SAXS profiles. (N.B. the factor of 100 between Na+ and Mg2+ found to yield agreement of SAXS profiles, reports on intra chain screening, e.g. between the phosphates on a given chain. A comparable factor has been reported in other studies of single-stranded nucleic acids51,52. Interparticle screening, reported by B2 values, reflects interactions between different molecular chains. It depends in a non-trivial way on both the valence and concentration of the charge compensating ion59,60, and is related to the lower entropic cost of associating a smaller number of Mg ions around the nucleic acid compared to monovalent Na ions61,62.) Finally, the distinct behavior of these sequences in Mg2+ is once again recovered: lower inter-chain repulsion (smaller B2) is found in poly rA than in poly rU across all probed [Mg2+]. Magnesium has a larger effect on chains of rA compared to rU.
This enhanced inter-chain screening of rA30 compared to rU30 in Mg2+ containing solutions hints at differences in the composition of the ion atmosphere between the two constructs. This composition can be determined by counting the number of excess ions around chains of each sequence. Quantifying the number of ions in the atmosphere around a nucleic acid provides challenges: differences in ion numbers across solution conditions are likely to be small, and both monovalent and divalent ions must be counted. Given these constraints, a precise measurement method that is sensitive to various ionic species is required. Buffer exchange atomic emission spectroscopy (BE-AES) is a technique that is becoming more commonly applied to biological systems 31,56,63–65. This technique grants high precision ion counts of Na and Mg ions around a biomolecule and is therefore well suited to evaluating the ionic environment around RNA.
Using BE-AES, we counted the number of excess Na and Mg ions around rU30 and rA30 in a mixed ion solution consisting of 20 mM Na+ and varying [Mg2+] (see Methods, SI, Tables S3–6 and Figs. S23–25). We restricted our measurements to solution conditions that show no signs of precipitation (0–3 mM Mg2+). Due to the sensitivity of the measurement, a 25bp DNA duplex was used as a control 56,65, and two [NA] utilized to mitigate potential errors arising from aggregation or precipitation of the sample 66. As in past work 56, low [Na+] was used to maximize signal-to-noise and to emphasize the expected effects of Mg2+. These conditions were also designed to match the SAXS experiments. Additional precautions were taken to avoid experimental artifacts (see SI).
For the 25bp DNA control in the absence of Mg2+, BE-AES returns (0.75±0.08) Na ions per phosphate. This number agrees with both our previous measurement 56 (0.81±0.10) and other authors’ work 65 (0.82±0.05). The agreement persists across all probed salt conditions (SI, Fig. S26) illustrating the robustness of these experiments across independent measurements.
We now turn to measurements on the single-strand constructs. Figure 5 shows the number of excess ions per phosphate as a function of the bulk [Mg2+]. At [Mg2+] = 0 mM, both rA30 and rU30 are electrostatically equivalent, with 24 excess Na ions attracted to each. This number agrees (on a per phosphate basis) with a recent measurement of rU40 under the same conditions 31, and is also consistent with the identical B2 measured in this condition. Compensation of the total molecular charge of each ssRNA polymer (29e−) is completed through exclusion of 5 anions from the atmosphere of each (Figure S28).
As we introduce Mg2+ to the buffer, striking differences in ion atmosphere composition become apparent. Looking first at the number of excess Mg ions, we see that across all probed conditions a greater number of Mg ions are associated with rA30 than with rU30. These differences are captured by calculating the competition coefficient (M1/2), which defines the concentration of Mg ions required to compete (replace) half the Na ions from the ion atmosphere. For rA30, we find M1/2 = (0.94±0.13), while for rU30, M1/2 = (1.31±0.32). From the ratio of these competition coefficients, approximately 40% more bulk [Mg2+] is required to displace half the Na ions from the atmosphere of rU30 compared to rA30.
Turning next to the Na ion counts, at all but the highest [Mg2+], rU30 has more associated Na ions than rA30. This result is expected given the Mg ion counts, and the condition of electroneutrality, but is more than trivial when put into context. If we compare competition coefficients to those previously measured for ssDNA analogues (dT30 and dA30) 56, we find the ssDNA results lie in between the values measured here for rA30 and rU30 (Figure 5 inset): less bulk [Mg2+] is required to displace half the Na ions around ssDNA than rU30. The ion dependencies and preferences for both ssRNAs are unique and distinct from the ssDNA results (SI, Fig. S27, Table S7). Strands containing multiple rA bases are ‘magnets’ for Mg2+, attracting significantly more of these ions than ssDNA; strands containing multiple rU bases are Na+ centers, holding Na+ much more effectively than either chains of rA or ssDNA.
Structural modelling from SAXS data
The precipitation and ion atmosphere data provide compelling evidence for unique ion interactions with a given RNA sequence, while the SAXS experiments show that these interactions have an impact on global chain conformations. To further interpret the structural changes reported by SAXS in a more comprehensive manner, we modified an iteratively refining model building system previously applied to ssDNA, for ssRNA 43. In this method, a dinucleotide step library based on crystal structure surveys is used to provide building blocks for single strands containing RNA nucleotides. A large pool is built using a Monte-Carlo procedure, and models that best fit the SAXS data are selected for every solution condition. The weights of dinucleotide steps that constitute these chains are increased, and a new structure pool proposed. This process is iterated until fits to the data converge. This procedure is run independently for each construct and solution condition (see Methods and SI, Fig. S29, Tables S8–9).
Previously, in addition to the SAXS data, we constrained the selection of dinucleotide steps by NMR sugar pucker weights, the frequency of steps in crystal structure surveys and steric hindrances. Given the CD data shows no significant stacking interactions for poly rU, we further constrained the possible conformers by eliminating stacked dinucleotide steps from pools that fit rU30, while leaving these steps present in pools that fit rA30.
Model conformations show ion specific backbone geometries
The refinement procedure provides a structural representation of underlying strand states for additional analysis. Results for all solution conditions, including characteristic conformations, are shown in SI (Figs. S30–39). We first quantify mid-range chain order by calculating the correlation lengths (lOCF) for strand states in each ionic condition (Figure 6). This important metric provides an additional check of model reasonability, through comparison to measured persistence lengths. Within rU30, a gradual decrease in lOCF, from ~22Å to 18Å is observed with increasing salt: the chain backbone gradually ‘forgets’ its original direction as the degree of screening increases. These values agree within error with previous work on rU40, in which SAXS and FRET were paired to constrain potential persistence length values 25. As expected, because the SAXS profiles are identical, the poly rU correlation lengths recapitulate the factor of 100 between Na and Mg ion concentrations: there is no special role or significant differences between these equivalent intrachain screening conditions. For rA bases however, the correlation lengths appear independent of added Na+ or Mg2+, suggesting that base-stacking is an important factor that determines local chain geometries.
While the correlation lengths determine the directional ‘stiffness’ of a polymer, this metric clearly fails to capture the differences observed in the Kratky plots for rA chains. To more globally describe the route of the phosphate backbone across all length scales, we calculate the orientation correlation function (OCF) between chain phosphates 67, displayed in Figure 7 for both constructs (see SI and Fig. S40). We also plot the mean number and length of stacked bases in rA conformations. Across all conditions for rU30, a gradual monotonic decay is observed as chains gradually ‘forget’ their orientation for longer distances along the backbone. This decay becomes more pronounced with increased screening efficacy. Again, the symmetry in poly rU about Na+ and Mg2+ is recovered, OCFs of 1 (or 100) or 2 (or 200) Mg (Na) are identical. This latter finding is not surprising given that the models are derived from raw SAXS profiles which themselves are similar.
The OCFs computed from structural models of rA30 display oscillatory behavior for all values of Na+ explored. A dramatic decay of the OCF between four neighboring phosphates on the backbone (x axis 0–4) leads to a resurgence of correlation at larger phosphate separations. This motif indicates ordering within a chain that repeats on a length scale of ~10 phosphates and corresponds to the A-form base-stacking interaction. It is highly prevalent in all of the models in the Na+ salt series, constituting ~23 stacks per chain. Differences in OCFs and stacked bases with increasing [Na] are marginal, with only the 200 mM Na+ data point showing a slightly decreased OCF amplitude.
With the addition of Mg2+, correlations emerge on a length scale that is absent from the Na+ series. A much sharper initial fall off is found for phosphate separations of 1–3, which subsequently yields a new correlation at phosphate separations of 4–6. For larger separations, chain directional persistence resembles the Na+ dependent form, consistent with the correlation lengths of Figure 6. The average number of stacked bases within chains in the Mg2+ series remains equivalent to that found in Na+. Crucially the mean length is slightly shortened from 5 to 3. This results in the dramatically varying stack arrangement on the backbone, leading to the sizeable differences reflected in the SAXS data.
While base-stacking generally favors straight (mechanically stiff) chain conformations, and therefore correlation lengths, we note that our definition of lOCF (equation 5) accounts for how rapidly the correlations of the phosphate backbone fall off with distance. The OCF provides quantitative characterization of this decay length. In poly rA structures, short stacked segments punctuated by free bases result in a much more rapid decay of the OCF compared to poly rU, and therefore a shorter correlation length in this formalism.
DISCUSSION
Numerous investigations have contributed to show how base identity impacts ssRNA conformations 53,54 and that ions have distinct interactions with different chain sequences 41,42,68. Our comprehensive study of ssRNA’s ion atmosphere and structure links the above findings. These results provide new insight into the effects of ion association on the structures of ssRNA, and the ion binding roles of single-strand regions within more complex RNAs.
Most significant is our quantification of the dramatic difference in the number and type of ions attracted to different homopolymeric sequences. The data of Figs. 4 and 5 (B2 and ion counting results) strongly suggest that this latter point is more than a simple preference of one sequence for Mg ions: in comparison to ssDNA analogues, the average number of Mg ions per phosphate attracted to poly rU is lower, while for poly rA it is higher. This point is particularly surprising given that unique ion atmospheres are usually attributed to structured RNAs, rather than to disordered elements themselves. The competition coefficients reported in Figure 5 show that disparate RNA sequences have a strong affinity for or against Mg ion interactions. This characteristic is not observed in identically charged ssDNA, either as poly dT or poly dA, where electrostatic equivalence occurs across a comparable range of mixed ion conditions56. We find that poly rA preferentially attracts Mg2+ and poly rU preferentially attracts Na+ relative to their ssDNA equivalents in these mixed salt solutions.
Of the two sequences explored, poly rU shows a much subtler dependence on ions than poly rA. In the former, the uracil base lends to identical strand conformations in Mg2+ or Na+, when concentrations are suitably scaled. Ionic strength (scaled) drives chain conformations rather than ion identity. The raw SAXS profiles and the derived OCFs reveal that Na+ and Mg2+ yield identical backbone conformations (Figure 8 top panel). This result suggests that non-specific, diffuse ion interactions with the poly rU chain drives ordering on short to medium length scales. This conclusion has been drawn in previous FRET and pulling experiments 21,23,25, quantifying elastic properties of rU chains. It is further confirmed by rU30’s solubility in all tested [Na+] or [Mg2+]. The close agreement of scattering profiles across ion types confirms that the 100 fold intrachain screening efficiency of [Mg2+] relative to [Na+] remains appropriate for poly rU, as previously found for other nucleic acids 25,52.
The OCFs (derived from the SAXS data) demonstrate the pronounced stiffness of rU chains in all probed conditions, as well as the retained correlation of bases separated by ~10 monomer steps. Interestingly, this residual order is not shared by dT30, where all correlations decay by these separations 43. The OCFs for poly rU are further poorly described by a simple worm-like chain model. Base-stacking has previously been proposed as the origin of this stiff behavior 25, however the absence of signal in our CD data and other pulling experiments would seem to challenge this idea 23,28. Pairing the OCFs with the ion counting data suggests that a different ion association mechanism explains these correlations. Salt bridges between Na ions, water and 2’OH groups may reinforce the rU backbone, resulting in a random coil like structure, but one that is stiffer than a DNA analogue. This mechanism has previously been proposed in pulling and NMR experiments to explain differences in stiffness between poly dT and poly rU 23,69,70. Here, it would explain the favored propensity for Na+ and increased stiffness over the DNA analogues, though this is open to further investigation.
The second sequence studied, poly rA displays a much richer connection between ion type and structure. As expected, the strong tendency of A bases to stack is on display through the Na+ titration. The CD experiments and SAXS-derived modelling show that the initial low salt (Na+ only) starting chain state features a high number of stacked bases, in good agreement with both MD predictions and experimental observations 22,32,37,39,71. These stacked geometries typically provide resistance against both large scale structural changes and ion binding interactions, as the winding phosphate backbone fails to provide enough coordination points to capture and dehydrate ions in the atmosphere 72. In Na+ titrations, the OCF results and CD data weakly depend on ion concentration, suggesting that the short-range helical order is maintained even as the chain globally compacts due to increased local screening.
The addition of Mg2+ to poly rA induces a dramatic shift in backbone conformation, most evident from the SAXS data (Kratky plots). The nature of the rearrangement is revealed by the OCFs: a new length scale for correlation emerges that is shorter than that expected for a purely A-form stacking interaction. This new geometry retains the high degree of stacking, assessed from CD and model compositions, but the average length of stacked bases is slightly reduced. From the BE-AES data, it appears that these conformations have an enhanced propensity for Mg2+ ions when compared to other ssNA constructs, suggesting an intimate connection between the two.
The rA30 model conformations selected when Mg2+ is present (Figure 8) show pockets or cage like structures formed by phosphates, 2’ hydroxyl groups and adenine bases. These geometries could potentially offer favorable regions for dehydrated magnesium associations to the backbone, as has been catalogued in crystallographic surveys of Mg2+ binding architectures in RNA 73, and more specifically by NMR studies on Mn2+ binding to poly rA 38. An energetic balance appears to be tipped when Mg ions are present, favoring ion association and capture at the cost of reducing the mean stack length. While the limited resolution of SAXS precludes atomic level insights, the detected differences in backbone orientations are consistent with global chain conformations that are highly suggestive of ion-RNA interactions. We recognize that SAXS based refinement of ensembles is subject to the biases inherent in model construction. Despite this caveat, the proposed structures offer one plausible visual representation of single-stranded RNA that is consistent with results of our numerous biophysical experiments. Further support for this hypothesis comes from water release measurements which show an anomalously large dehydration effect upon addition of Mg2+ to poly rA compared to any other ssNA construct (both DNA and RNA), and posit 3–5 direct Mg2+ coordinations to rA chains, involving phosphates and adenine bases 41,42. Localized associations of Mg2+ to the rA backbone is highly likely to induce precipitation, as we and others have observed, and would neatly explain all our experimental data.
Clearly, RNA chemistry imparts a rich degree of ion and conformational heterogeneity. Nature exploits the balance of sequence, added 2’OH group and ion identity/hydration to achieve the wide variety of RNA structures compatible with their breadth of function. While many functional RNAs, such as riboswitches and ribosomes, rely on mixed sequences to facilitate bending and folding, it is interesting to note the importance of homopolymer tracts in biological systems. In particular, poly A tails act as markers on mature mRNAs, signaling and specifically recruiting poly A binding proteins for further processing 74. In juxtaposition, long poly U tracts are found in lncRNAs. Although the role of these tracts is a topic of current debate, it is speculated that they act as generic protein binding sites for the myriad of protein partners that lncRNAs entertain 75,76. Differences in the ion atmosphere may make the latter sequences more amenable to protein binding, as weaker electrostatic forces preferentially displace monovalent than divalent ions. In addition, the propensity of A-tracts to self-structure around divalent ions may require a higher cost for binding, as more bonds need to be disrupted. Thus, this work suggests that nature not only utilizes specific (in the case of poly rA) or non-specific (in the case of poly rU) conformations and H-bonding networks to recruit protein binding partners but may also exploit a sequence dependent ion atmosphere as yet another flag for interactions.
CONCLUSION
Here we have used ion counting methods, spectroscopy and SAXS to quantitatively investigate the effects of sequence on the ion atmosphere and conformation of ssRNAs. These incisive measurements demonstrate that RNA sequence not only instills a unique conformation to chains, but also unique ion binding preferences. The data presented here are sufficiently comprehensive to seed comparisons with computational models of highly flexible and highly charged polymers; such motifs have traditionally eluded description by simple models. Given the prevalence of RNA homopolymers in biological and physical systems, the results of this study likely have broad implications in both experiment and theoretical modelling.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Pollack lab members for useful discussions.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [R35-GM122514]. Funding for open access charge: National Institutes of Health. CHESS is supported by the NSF and NIH/NIGMS via NSF Award No. DMR-1332208, and the MacCHESS resource is supported by NIGMS Award No. GM-103485.
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Experimental Methods, Data Analysis, Supplementary Data.
REFERENCES
- (1).Pyle AM Group II Intron Self-Splicing. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2016, 45, 183–205. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-011149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Montange RK; Batey RT Riboswitches: Emerging Themes in RNA Structure and Function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 117–133. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.130000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Bonasio R; Shiekhattar R Regulation of Transcription by Long Noncoding RNAs. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014, 48, 433–455. 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Sharp PA The Centrality of RNA. Cell 2009, 136, 577–580. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Saenger W Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure, 1st ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Bowman JC; Lenz TK; Hud NV; Williams LD Cations in Charge: Magnesium Ions in RNA Folding and Catalysis. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22, 262–272. 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Chen S-J RNA Folding: Conformational Statistics, Folding Kinetics, and Ion Electrostatics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 197–214. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Lipfert J; Doniach S; Das R; Herschlag D Understanding Nucleic Acid-Ion Interactions. Annu Rev Biochem 2014, 83, 813–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Yang C; Lim M; Kim E; Pak Y Predicting RNA Structures via a Simple van Der Waals Correction to an All-Atom Force Field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (2), 395–399. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Vušurović N; Altman RB; Terry DS; Micura R; Blanchard SC Pseudoknot Formation Seeds the Twister Ribozyme Cleavage Reaction Coordinate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (24), 8186–8193. 10.1021/jacs.7b01549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Chen Y-L; Sutton JL; Pollack L How the Conformations of an Internal Junction Contribute to Fold an RNA Domain. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 11363–11372. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Chen Y-L; Lee T; Elber R; Pollack L Conformations of an RNA Helix-Junction-Helix Construct Revealed by SAXS Refinement of MD Simulations. Biophys. J. 2019, 116 (1), 19–30. 10.1016/J.BPJ.2018.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Sun L-Z; Chen S-J Predicting RNA-Metal Ion Binding with Ion Dehydration Effects. Biophys. J. 2019, 116, 184–195. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Plumridge A; Katz AM; Calvey GD; Elber R; Kirmizialtin S Revealing the Distinct Folding Phases of an RNA Three-Helix Junction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46 (14), 7354–7365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Trachman RJ; Draper DE Divalent Ion Competition Reveals Reorganization of an RNA Ion Atmosphere upon Folding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45 (8), 4733–4742. 10.1093/nar/gkw1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Gebala M; Giambaşu GM; Lipfert J; Bisaria N; Bonilla S; Li G; York DM; Herschlag D Cation-Anion Interactions within the Nucleic Acid Ion Atmosphere Revealed by Ion Counting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (46), 14705–14715. 10.1021/jacs.5b08395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Gracia B; Al-Hashimi HM; Bisaria N; Das R; Herschlag D; Russell R Hidden Structural Modules in a Cooperative RNA Folding Transition. Cell Rep. 2018, 22 (12), 3240–3250. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Ren A; Vušurović N; Gebetsberger J; Gao P; Juen M; Kreutz C; Micura R; Patel DJ Pistol Ribozyme Adopts a Pseudoknot Fold Facilitating Site-Specific in-Line Cleavage. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12 (9), 702–708. 10.1038/nchembio.2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Chen B; Zuo X; Wang YX; Dayie TK Multiple Conformations of SAM-II Riboswitch Detected with SAXS and NMR Spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (7), 3117–3130. 10.1093/nar/gkr1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Haller A; Rieder U; Aigner M; Blanchard SC; Micura R Conformational Capture of the SAM-II Riboswitch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7 (6), 393–400. 10.1038/nchembio.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Sutton JL; Pollack L Tuning RNA Flexibility with Helix Length and Junction Sequence. Biophys. J. 2015, 109 (12), 2644–2653. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Seol Y; Skinner GM; Visscher K; Buhot A; Halperin A Stretching of Homopolymeric RNA Reveals Single-Stranded Helices and Base-Stacking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98 (15), 158103 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.158103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Jacobson DR; McIntosh DB; Saleh OA The Snakelike Chain Character of Unstructured RNA. Biophys. J. 2013, 105 (11), 2569–2576. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Eichhorn CD; Al-Hashimi HM Structural Dynamics of a Single-Stranded RNA - Helix Junction Using NMR. RNA 2014, 20 (6), 782–791. 10.1261/rna.043711.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Chen H; Meisburger SP; Pabit SA; Sutton JL; Webb WW; Pollack L Ionic Strength-Dependent Persistence Lengths of Single-Stranded RNA and DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109 (3), 799–804. 10.1073/pnas.1119057109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Chen B; LeBlanc R; Dayie TK SAM-II Riboswitch Samples at Least Two Conformations in Solution in the Absence of Ligand: Implications for Recognition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 1–5. 10.1002/anie.201509997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Bizarro CV; Alemany A; Ritort F Non-Specific Binding of Na+ and Mg2+ to RNA Determined by Force Spectroscopy Methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (14), 6922–6935. 10.1093/nar/gks289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Seol Y; Skinner GM; Visscher K Elastic Properties of a Single-Stranded Charged Homopolymeric Ribonucleotide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93 (11), 8–11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.118102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Kuznetsov S V; Ansari, A. A Kinetic Zipper Model with Intrachain Interactions Applied to Nucleic Acid Hairpin Folding Kinetics. Biophys. J. 2012, 102 (1), 101–111. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Jacobson DR; McIntosh DB; Stevens MJ; Rubinstein M; Saleh OA Single-Stranded Nucleic Acid Elasticity Arises from Internal Electrostatic Tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 201701132 10.1073/pnas.1701132114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Jacobson DR; Saleh OA Quantifying the Ion Atmosphere of Unfolded, Single-Stranded Nucleic Acids Using Equilibrium Dialysis and Single-Molecule Methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44 (8), 3763–3771. 10.1093/nar/gkw196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Condon DE; Kennedy SD; Mort BC; Kierzek R; Yildirim I; Turner DH Stacking in RNA: NMR of Four Tetramers Benchmark Molecular Dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11 (6), 2729–2742. 10.1021/ct501025q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Chakraborty D; Hori N; Thirumalai D Sequence-Dependent Three Interaction Site Model for Single- and Double-Stranded DNA. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14 (7), 3763–3779. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Mak CH Atomistic Free Energy Model for Nucleic Acids: Simulations of Single-Stranded DNA and the Entropy Landscape of RNA Stem-Loop Structures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119 (47), 14840–14856. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Henke PS; Mak CH An Implicit Divalent Counterion Force Field for RNA Molecular Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144 (10), 105104 10.1063/1.4943387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Szabla R; Havrila M; Kruse H; Sponer J Comparative Assessment of Different RNA Tetranucleotides from the DFT-D3 and Force Field Perspective. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120 (41), 10635–10648. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Applequist J; Damle V Thermodynamics of the One-Stranded Helix-Coil Equilibrium in Polyadenylic Acid. Phys. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 88 (17), 3895–3900. 10.1007/3-540-12065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Yamada A; Akasaka K; Hatano H Proton and Phosphorus-31 Magnetic Relaxation Studies on the Interaction of Polyriboadenylic Acid with Mn2+. Biopolymers 1976, 15 (7), 1315–1331. 10.1002/bip.1976.360150708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Suurkuusk J; Alvarez J; Freire E; Biltonen R Calorimetric Determination of the Heat Capacity Changes Associated with the Conformational Transitions of Polyriboadenylic Acid and Polyribouridylic Acid. Biopolymers 1977, 16 (12), 2641–2652. 10.1002/bip.1977.360161206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Pörschke D The Mode of Mg++ binding to Oligonucleotides. Inner Sphere Complexes as Markers for Recognition? Nucleic Acids Res. 1979, 6 (3), 883–898. 10.1093/nar/6.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Kankia BI Binding of Mg to Single-Stranded Polynulecotides: Hydration and Optical Studies. Biophys. Chem. 2003, 104 (3), 643–654. 10.1016/S0301-4622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Kankia BI Inner-Sphere Complexes of Divalent Cations with Single-Stranded Poly(RA) and Poly(RU). Biopolymers 2004, 74 (3), 232–239. 10.1002/bip.20082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Plumridge A; Meisburger S; Pollack L Visualizing Single-Stranded Nucleic Acids in Solution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45 (9), e66 10.1093/nar/gkw1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Yamagami R; Bingaman JL; Frankel EA; Bevilacqua PC Cellular Conditions of Weakly Chelated Magnesium Ions Strongly Promote RNA Stability and Catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (2149). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Korolev N; Berezhnoy NV; Eom KD; Tam JP; Nordenskiöld L A Universal Description for the Experimental Behavior of Salt-(in)Dependent Oligocation-Induced DNA Condensation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (21), 7137–7150. 10.1093/nar/gkp683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Soto AM; Misra V; Draper DE Tertiary Structure of an RNA Pseudoknot Is Stabilized by “Diffuse” Mg2+ Ions. Biochemistry 2007, 46 (11), 2973–2983. 10.1021/bi0616753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Kypr J; Kejnovská I; Renčiuk D; Vorlíčková M Circular Dichroism and Conformational Polymorphism of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (6), 1713–1725. 10.1093/nar/gkp026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Greenfield NJ Using Circular Dichroism Spectra to Estimate Protein Secondary Structure. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 1 (6), 2876–2890. 10.1038/nprot.2006.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Cantor CR; Shapiro H Dichroism Studies of the Conformation of Deoxyoligonucleotides. Biopolymers 1970, 9 (9), 1059–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Katz AM; Tolokh IS; Pabit SA; Baker N; Onufriev AV; Pollack L Spermine Condenses DNA, but Not RNA Duplexes. Biophys. J. 2017, 112 (1), 22–30. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).McIntosh DB; Saleh OA Salt Species-Dependent Electrostatic Effects on SsDNA Elasticity. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 2328–2333. 10.1021/ma1028196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Bosco A; Camunas-Soler J; Ritort F Elastic Properties and Secondary Structure Formation of Single-Stranded DNA at Monovalent and Divalent Salt Conditions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42 (3), 2064–2074. 10.1093/nar/gkt1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Eisenberg H; Felsenfeld G Studies of the Temperature-Dependent Conformation and Phase Separation of Polyriboadenylic Acid Solutions at Neutral PH. J. Mol. Biol. 1967, 30 (1), 17–37. 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90240-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Inners LD; Felsenfeld G Conformation of Polyribouridylic Acid in Solution. J. Mol. Biol. 1970, 50 (2), 373–389. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90199-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Meisburger SP; Sutton JL; Chen H; Pabit SA; Kirmizialtin S; Elber R; Pollack L Polyelectrolyte Properties of Single Stranded DNA Measured Using SAXS and Single-Molecule FRET: Beyond the Wormlike Chain Model. Biopolymers 2013, 99 (12), 1032–1045. 10.1002/bip.22265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Plumridge A; Meisburger SP; Andresen K; Pollack L The Impact of Base Stacking on the Conformations and Electrostatics of Single-Stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45 (7), 3932–3943. 10.1093/cercor/bhw393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Meisburger SP; Thomas WC; Watkins MB; Ando N X-Ray Scattering Studies of Protein Structural Dynamics. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (12), 7615–7672. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Pollack L SAXS Studies of Ion-Nucleic Acid Interactions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2011, 40, 225–242. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Qiu X; Kwok LW; Park HY; Lamb JS; Andresen K; Pollack L Measuring Inter-DNA Potentials in Solution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 138101 (April), 1–4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.138101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Qiu X; Andresen K; Kwok LW; Lamb JS; Park HY; Pollack L Inter-DNA Attraction Mediated by Divalent Counterions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99 (3), 1–4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.038104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Manning GS The Molecular Theory of Polyelectrolyte Solutions with Applications to the Electrostatic Properties of Polynucleotides. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1978, 11 (2), 179–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Bacquet RJ; Rossky PJ Ionic Distributions and Competitive Association in DNA / Mixed Salt Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92 (12), 3604–3612. 10.1021/j100323a056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (63).Gebala M; Bonilla S; Bisaria N; Herschlag D Does Cation Size Affect Occupancy and Electrostatic Screening of the Nucleic Acid Ion Atmosphere? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (34), 10925–10934. 10.1021/jacs.6b04289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (64).Jacobson DR; Saleh OA Counting the Ions Surrounding Nucleic Acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 45 (4), 1596–1605. 10.1093/nar/gkw1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (65).Bai Y; Greenfeld M; Travers KJ; Chu VB; Lipfert J; Doniach S; Herschlag D Quantitative and Comprehensive Decomposition of the Ion Atmosphere around Nucleic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (48), 14981–14988. 10.1021/ja075020g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (66).Greenfeld M; Herschlag D Probing Nucleic Acid–Ion Interactions with Buffer Exchange-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 469, 375–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Ullner M; Woodward CE Orientational Correlation Function and Persistence Lengths of Flexible Polyelectrolytes. Macromolecules 2002, 35 (4), 1437–1445. 10.1021/ma010863s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (68).Pörschke D Thermodynamic and Kinetic Parameters of Ion Condensation to Polynucleotides. Outer Sphere Complex Formed by Mg++ Ions. Biophys. Chem. 1976, 4 (4), 383–394. 10.1016/0301-4622(76)80018-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (69).Young PR; Kallenbach NR Secondary Structure in Polyuridylic Acid. Non-Classical Hydrogen Bonding and the Function of the Ribose 2’-Hydroxyl Group. J. Mol. Biol. 1978, 126 (3), 467–479. 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (70).Bolton PH; Kearns DR Intramolecular Water Bridge between the 2’-OH and Phosphate Groups of RNA. Cyclic Nucleotides as a Model System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101 (2), 479–484. 10.1021/ja00496a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- (71).Scholl ZN; Rabbi M; Lee D; Manson L; S-Gracz H; Marszalek PE Origin of Overstretching Transitions in Single-Stranded Nucleic Acids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111 (18), 1–5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.188302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (72).McIntosh DB; Duggan G; Gouil Q; Saleh OA Sequence-Dependent Elasticity and Electrostatics of Single-Stranded DNA: Signatures of Base-Stacking. Biophys. J. 2014, 106 (3), 659–666. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (73).Zheng H; Shabalin IG; Handing KB; Bujnicki JM; Minor W Magnesium-Binding Architectures in RNA Crystal Structures: Validation, Binding Preferences, Classification and Motif Detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43 (7), 3789–3801. 10.1093/nar/gkv225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (74).Frye M; Harada TB; Behm M; He C RNA Modifications Modulate Gene Expression during Development. Science 2018, 361 (6409), 1346–1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (75).Liu F; Somarowthu S; Marie Pyle A Visualizing the Secondary and Tertiary Architectural Domains of LncRNA RepA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13 (3), 282–289. 10.1038/nCHeMBIO.2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (76).Smola MJ; Christy TW; Inoue K; Nicholson CO; Friedersdorf M; Keene JD; Lee DM; Calabrese JM; Weeks KM SHAPE Reveals Transcript-Wide Interactions, Complex Structural Domains, and Protein Interactions across the Xist LncRNA in Living Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016, 113 (37), 10322–10327. 10.1073/pnas.1600008113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.