Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 May 20;5(8):1–10. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1511

Association Between Preterm Birth and Arrested Cardiac Growth in Adolescents and Young Adults

Kara N Goss 1,2,, Kristin Haraldsdottir 1,3, Arij G Beshish 1, Gregory P Barton 1,4, Andrew M Watson 5, Mari Palta 6,7, Naomi C Chesler 1,6,7,8, Chris J Francois 8,9, Oliver Wieben 4,8,9, Marlowe W Eldridge 1,3,8
PMCID: PMC7240643  PMID: 32432648

This cross-sectional cohort study characterizes cardiac structure and function in adolescents and young adults born preterm using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Key Points

Question

What are the consequences of premature birth for later cardiac structure and function?

Findings

In this cardiac magnetic resonance imaging–based cross-sectional cohort study, adolescents (n = 20) and young adults (n = 38) born moderately to extremely preterm (≤32 weeks) demonstrated statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size and lower biventricular mass compared with 52 age-matched participants who were born at term. Cardiac function was preserved, with a hypercontractile strain pattern in adults.

Meaning

Adolescents and young adults born prematurely had statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size with preserved function, notably without a hypertrophic response, which may contribute to their increased lifetime cardiovascular risk.

Abstract

Importance

Premature birth is associated with substantially higher lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease, including arrhythmia, ischemic disease, and heart failure, although the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.

Objective

To characterize cardiac structure and function in adolescents and young adults born preterm using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional cohort study at an academic medical center included adolescents and young adults born moderately to extremely premature (20 in the adolescent cohort born from 2003 to 2004 and 38 in the young adult cohort born in the 1980s and 1990s) and 52 age-matched participants who were born at term and underwent cardiac MRI. The dates of analysis were February 2016 to October 2019.

Exposures

Premature birth (gestational age ≤32 weeks) or birth weight less than 1500 g.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main study outcomes included MRI measures of biventricular volume, mass, and strain.

Results

Of 40 adolescents (24 [60%] girls), the mean (SD) age of participants in the term and preterm groups was 13.3 (0.7) years and 13.0 (0.7) years, respectively. Of 70 adults (43 [61%] women), the mean (SD) age of participants in the term and preterm groups was 25.4 (2.9) years and 26.5 (3.5) years, respectively. Participants from both age cohorts who were born prematurely had statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size compared with participants in the term group: the mean (SD) left ventricular end-diastolic volume index was 72 (7) vs 80 (9) and 80 (10) vs 92 (15) mL/m2 for adolescents and adults in the preterm group compared with age-matched participants in the term group, respectively (P < .001), and the mean (SD) left ventricular end-systolic volume index was 30 (4) vs 34 (6) and 32 (7) vs 38 (8) mL/m2, respectively (P < .001). Stroke volume index was also reduced in adolescent vs adult participants in the preterm group vs age-matched participants in the term group, with a mean (SD) of 42 (7) vs 46 (7) and 48 (7) vs 54 (9) mL/m2, respectively (P < .001), although biventricular ejection fractions were preserved. Biventricular mass was statistically significantly lower in adolescents and adults born preterm: the mean (SD) left ventricular mass index was 39.6 (5.9) vs 44.4 (7.5) and 40.7 (7.3) vs 49.8 (14.0), respectively (P < .001). Cardiac strain analyses demonstrated a hypercontractile heart, primarily in the right ventricle, in adults born prematurely.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, adolescents and young adults born prematurely had statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size and decreased cardiac mass. Although function was preserved in both age groups, these morphologic differences may be associated with elevated lifetime cardiovascular disease risk after premature birth.

Introduction

Premature birth, defined as less than 37 weeks’ completed gestation, occurs in 1 in 10 live births worldwide and accounts for almost half a million deliveries in the United States annually.1,2 Given the dramatic improvements in neonatal care during the 1980s and early 1990s, the edge of viability has rapidly improved from 32 weeks’ to approximately 23 weeks’ gestation, with an ever-growing number of extremely preterm infants now surviving into adolescence and adulthood. Despite improved medical care, these individuals are at higher risk for pulmonary,3,4,5 systemic cardiovascular,6,7,8,9,10,11 pulmonary vascular,12,13,14,15 and metabolic16,17,18 disease. Because of increased risk for a number of comorbidities, the National Institutes of Health now recommends that preterm birth be considered a chronic medical condition.4,5

Despite the previously mentioned multisystem consequences, little is known about the long-term implications of premature birth on cardiac structure and function. A recent Swedish registry study19 of 2.6 million individuals born from 1987 to 2012 identified a 17-fold increased risk of incident heart failure among children and young adults born extremely preterm, although the mechanisms are largely unknown. In addition, premature birth is associated with higher risk for ischemic disease and arrhythmias.20,21 A large single-center cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study conducted by Lewandowski et al7,8 at the University of Oxford (Oxford, United Kingdom) of 102 adults aged 25 years who were born at a mean gestational age of 30 weeks between 1982 and 1985 identified a unique left ventricular (LV) geometry with smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size and higher biventricular mass. Furthermore, the degree of prematurity was an independent predictor of biventricular hypertrophy; although LV ejection fraction was preserved, LV strain rates and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction were lower in preterm-born adults.7,8 However, echocardiography-based studies22,23,24 in younger populations demonstrate preserved biventricular function with smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size and generally lower cardiac mass, raising the question of whether hypertrophy simply develops later in life. In addition, recent studies from both the University of Wisconsin–Madison12 and the University of Oxford25 demonstrate substantial functional consequences of these structural abnormalities in adults born preterm, characterized by a blunted stroke volume (SV) response to exercise.

Given the substantial improvements in neonatal care over the past 3 decades, it is unclear to what extent the prior MRI findings7,8 of smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size with biventricular hypertrophy and depressed LV and RV function in adulthood are broadly generalizable to children and adults born during more recent eras of neonatal care. The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate cardiac structure and function in adolescents and young adults born prematurely using cardiac MRI. Our central hypothesis was that adolescents and adults born prematurely would have altered cardiac structure and function compared with term-born controls.

Methods

Participants

In this cross-sectional cohort study, adolescent (n = 20) and young adult (n = 38) participants who were born moderately to extremely premature were recruited from the Newborn Lung Project, a cohort of infants born with very low birth weight (<1500 g) between 1988 and 1991 (25 adults) or 2003 and 2004 (20 adolescents) in Wisconsin or Iowa and followed up prospectively at the University of Wisconsin–Madison,26,27,28,29,30 or from the general public with confirmation of birth history from neonatal records (13 individuals with gestational age ≤32 weeks or birth weight <1500 g). The dates of analysis were February 2016 to October 2019. Comprehensive neonatal records were available for all participants in the preterm group. Age-matched control participants who were born at term from the same birth years were recruited from the local population (n = 52), with a subset of adolescents recruited from prior participation in the Newborn Lung Project as normal birth weight control participants at age 2 years.31,32 Participants were free of cardiovascular or respiratory illness and were nonsmokers. All participants and adolescents’ guardians were informed of the objective and risks of the study and provided written informed consent, including assent for adolescents, in accordance with the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki.33 The protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Cardiovascular MRI Acquisition and Analysis

Cardiac MRI was performed at rest on a clinical 3-T MRI scanner (Discovery MR750; GE Healthcare) or 3-T positron emission tomography (PET)–MRI scanner (GE Signa PET/MR Discovery 750W; GE Healthcare). To characterize cardiac function, a prospective electrocardiogram-gated, multislice balanced, steady-state free precession sequence was acquired during an end-expiratory breath hold with a field of view of 35 × 35 cm, spatial resolution of 1.4 × 1.4 mm, slice thickness of 7 mm, 17 slices, breath hold length of 13 seconds, and 20 reconstructed cardiac phases.

Analysis of volumetric cardiac images was performed by an analyst from the University of Wisconsin–Madison Medical Imaging Research Support image analysis core laboratory, who was blinded to birth history and used commercially available software (cvi42, version 5.6.6; Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc). The LV and RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), SV, cardiac output (CO), and ventricular mass were calculated from short-axis, cine-balanced, steady-state free precession series. Ventricular volumes and mass in end-diastole were indexed to body surface area. Three slices from the LV and RV (base, mid, and apex) short-axis and long-axis cine MRI scans were used to analyze longitudinal, circumferential, and radial dimensions and strain as a function of time, including average peak strain and systolic and diastolic strain rate, using commercially available software (Segment, version 2.2 R6423 strain analysis module; Medviso).34

Statistical Analysis

Data were initially stratified by age group (adolescents or adults) and birth status (term or preterm). Baseline anthropometric and MRI data were compared across birth status within each age group using unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Neonatal characteristics were compared between adolescent and adult preterm birth cohorts using unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum tests. To evaluate the association between preterm birth and cardiovascular characteristics for the entire group, separate linear regression models were developed to predict each cardiovascular variable with age and birth status (term or preterm) as covariates. Finally, to investigate the association of preterm birth characteristics with subsequent cardiac function, we a priori selected chronological age, gestational age, total days on assisted ventilation, and patent ductus arteriosus, and multivariable regression models were used to predict cardiac mass and function. The level of statistical significance was assessed a priori at P < .05, and all tests were 2-tailed. Data are presented as means (SDs), unless otherwise noted. Statistical analyses were performed in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing),35 and graphs were generated using Prism GraphPad, version 7 (GraphPad Software).

Results

Participant Baseline Characteristics

Adolescents born prematurely were of a similar sex distribution and similar age as their term-born counterparts (Table 1). Of 40 adolescents (24 [60%] girls), the mean (SD) age of participants in the term and preterm groups was 13.3 (0.7) years and 13.0 (0.7) years, respectively. Of 70 adults (43 [61%] women), the mean (SD) age of participants in the term and preterm groups was 25.4 (2.9) years and 26.5 (3.5) years, respectively. Although the adults in the preterm group were about 1 year older than the adults in the term group, the adult participants were born in the same birth years. Participants who were born preterm were shorter and demonstrated higher systolic, diastolic, and mean systemic blood pressure. Overall, gestational age and birth weight were similar in the adolescent and adult preterm cohorts. Compared with the adolescent cohort, the adult cohort had lower Apgar scores at birth and longer time on invasive ventilation, although total days on assisted ventilation (invasive and noninvasive combined) and days in the neonatal intensive care unit were not statistically significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Overall, 42 of 58 (72%) infants born preterm required invasive ventilation. Adults born prematurely were also statistically significantly less likely to receive antenatal corticosteroids or surfactant, reflecting changing neonatal practice patterns during the late 1980s and early 1990s. Rates of patent ductus arteriosus requiring treatment and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were similar between groups.

Table 1. Baseline Characteristicsa.

Characteristic Adolescents Adults All
Mean (SD) P valueb Mean (SD) P valueb P valuec
Term (n = 20) Preterm (n = 20) Term (n = 32) Preterm (n = 38)
Male, No. (%) 9 (45) 7 (35) .75 13 (41) 14 (37) .94 .65
Chronological age, y 13.3 (0.7) 13.0 (0.7) .09 25.4 (2.9) 26.5 (3.5) .02 .12
Anthropometric measures for adolescents and adults
Height, m 1.65 (0.08) 1.58 (0.09) .01 1.72 (0.09) 1.68 (0.08) .06 .002
Weight, kg 54.7 (14.0) 47.1 (8.3) .10 69.5 (9.9) 75.9 (24.0) .71 .92
Body surface area, m2 1.57 (0.22) 1.44 (0.16) .05 1.82 (0.17) 1.86 (0.29) .96 .39
Body mass indexd 20.0 (4.1) 18.7 (2.5) .43 23.3 (1.8) 26.9 (8.4) .08 .13
Systolic BP, mm Hg 110 (5) 115 (6) .01 114 (9) 116 (11) .45 .11
Diastolic BP, mm Hg 60 (5) 66 (5) .004 70 (6) 73 (8) .10 .003
Mean systemic BP, mm Hg 77 (4) 82 (4) .001 84 (6) 87 (8) .15 .01
Neonatal characteristics for adolescents and adults born prematurely
Gestational age, wk NA 28.5 (1.9) NA NA 29.0 (2.7) NA .35
Birth weight, g NA 1150 (270) NA NA 1187 (397) NA .99
Apgar score at 1 min NA 4.8 (2.1) NA NA 4.3 (2.3) NA .40
Apgar score at 5 min NA 7.7 (1.3) NA NA 6.7 (1.7) NA .03
Antenatal corticosteroids, No. (%) NA 16 (80) NA NA 11 (29) NA .001
Surfactant, No. (%) NA 14 (70) NA NA 10 (26) NA .01
Postnatal corticosteroids, No. (%) NA 3 (15) NA NA 6 (16) NA .99
Invasive ventilation days NA 6.4 (14.0) NA NA 11.8 (13.6) NA .05
CPAP days NA 8.9 (13.0) NA NA 2.1 (5.9) NA .01
Total days on assisted ventilatione NA 13.7 (19.0) NA NA 14.2 (14.6) NA .58
Days on oxygen NA 33 (39) NA NA 45 (89) NA .99
Days in the NICU NA 52.8 (17.4) NA NA 61.3 (28.3) NA .18
Patent ductus arteriosus, No. (%) NA 6 (30) NA NA 18 (47) NA .24
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, No. (%)f NA 9 (45) NA NA 15 (39) NA .99
Neonatal sepsis, No. (%) NA 3 (15) NA NA 14 (37) NA .12

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; NA, not applicable; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.

a

Categorical variables are expressed as No. (%), and continuous data are expressed as mean (SD).

b

P values are by unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum tests within each age cohort.

c

P values are for all individuals in the term and preterm groups across age cohorts by least-squares means from an age-adjusted linear model.

d

Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

e

Total days on assisted ventilation include the combination of invasive and noninvasive (CPAP) ventilation.

f

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is defined clinically by the use of supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age.

Biventricular Structure and Function

Main cardiac structure and function outcomes assessed via MRI are listed in Table 2. Notably, participants who were born prematurely from both age cohorts had statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size compared with participants in the term group: the mean (SD) LV EDV index was 72 (7) vs 80 (9) and 80 (10) vs 92 (15) mL/m2 for adolescents and adults who were born prematurely compared with age-matched participants in the term group, respectively (P < .001), and the mean (SD) LV end-systolic volume index was 30 (4) vs 34 (6) and 32 (7) vs 38 (8) mL/m2, respectively (P < .001). Stroke volume index was also reduced, with a mean (SD) of 42 (7) vs 46 (7) and 48 (7) vs 54 (9) mL/m2 (P < .001) for adolescents and adults who were born prematurely compared with age-matched participants in the term group, respectively, although biventricular ejection fractions were preserved. Resting heart rates and cardiac indexes were similar between participants who were born at term or preterm within each birth cohort.

Table 2. Cardiac Structure and Function Assessed via Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Variable Adolescents Adults All
Mean (SD) P valuea Mean (SD) P valuea P valueb
Term (n = 20) Preterm (n = 20) Term (n = 32) Preterm (n = 38)
Global measures
Heart rate, beats/min 97 (17) 96 (20) .58 66 (12) 71 (11) .08 .21
Cardiac output, L/min 7.1 (1.8) 5.7 (1.6) .01 6.4 (1.3) 6.3 (1.4) .74 .06
Cardiac index, L/min/m2 4.5 (1.0) 4.0 (0.8) .07 3.5 (0.7) 3.4 (0.7) .47 .13
LV
EDV, mL 125 (20) 104 (17) <.001 168 (38) 149 (31) .03 <.001
EDVi, mL/m2 80 (9) 72 (7) .008 92 (15) 80 (10) <.001 <.001
ESV, mL 53 (11) 43 (6) .004 70 (19) 60 (16) .10 <.001
ESVi, mL/m2 34 (6) 30 (4) .10 38 (8) 32 (7) .003 <.001
SV, mL 73 (14) 61 (15) .004 98 (22) 88 (19) .09 .002
SVi, mL/m2 46 (7) 42 (7) .06 54 (9) 48 (7) .004 <.001
Ejection fraction, % 57.7 (5.8) 57.9 (6.1) .99 58.7 (4.5) 59.8 (5.4) .37 .48
Mass, g 70 (17) 57 (13) .005 92 (32) 77 (22) .05 <.001
Mass index, g/m2 44.4 (7.5) 39.6 (5.9) .03 49.8 (14.0) 40.7 (7.3) .004 <.001
Mass ÷ EDV, g/mL 0.55 (0.08) 0.55 (0.08) .79 0.54 (0.10) 0.51 (0.08) .33 .30
RV
EDV, mL 128 (26) 103 (23) <.001 176 (49) 156 (35) .14 .002
EDVi, mL/m2 81 (11) 71 (12) .03 96 (19) 84 (13) .01 <.001
ESV, mL 57 (15) 42 (10) <.001 79 (28) 70 (21) .21 .005
ESVi, mL/m2 36 (7) 30 (6) .02 43 (12) 37 (9.1) .07 .001
SV, mL 71 (14) 60 (14) .01 97 (23) 86 (19) .07 .003
SVi, mL/m2 46 (7) 42 (7) .08 53 (10) 46 (7) <.001 <.001
Ejection fraction, % 56.0 (5.2) 58.7 (4.3) .07 55.6 (5.2) 55.8 (6.5) .89 .27
Mass, g 10 (2) 8 (2) .02 18 (6) 16 (4) .28 .02
Mass index, g/m2 6.07 (0.96) 5.74 (0.89) .26 9.62 (2.60) 8.45 (1.80) .06 .01
Mass ÷ EDV, g/mL 0.07 (0.01) 0.08 (0.01) .07 0.10 (0.02) 0.10 (0.02) .78 .72
RV mass ÷ LV mass 0.14 (0.03) 0.15 (0.02) .25 0.20 (0.04) 0.21 (0.04) .13 .28

Abbreviations: EDV, end-diastolic volume; EDVi, end-diastolic volume index; ESV, end-systolic volume; ESVi, end-systolic volume index; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; SV, stroke volume; SVi, stroke volume index.

a

P values are by unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum tests within each age cohort.

b

P values are for all individuals in the term and preterm groups across age cohorts by least-squares means from an age-adjusted linear model.

However, contrary to prior single-center studies7,8 in adults born prematurely, although consistent with prior studies22,23 in children, the LV and RV mass indexes were also statistically significantly smaller in adolescents and adults born preterm, without a statistically significant difference in the ratio of RV mass to LV mass to suggest a differential ventricular hypertrophy response. The mean (SD) LV mass index was 44.4 (7.5) vs 39.6 (5.9) for adolescent term vs preterm and 49.8 (14.0) vs 40.7 (7.3) for adult term vs preterm; the mean (SD) RV mass index was 6.1 (1.0) vs 5.7 (0.9) for adolescent term vs preterm and 9.6 (2.6) vs 8.5 (1.8) for adult term vs preterm.

To further characterize contractile function, biventricular strain was analyzed. Although there were no statistically significant differences in biventricular strain among adolescents, adults born prematurely demonstrated statistically significantly higher LV longitudinal, RV longitudinal, and RV circumferential strain compared with term-born adults, suggesting a hypercontractile heart (Figure and Table 3). The mean (SD) LV longitudinal strain was −12.7 (2.8) vs −14.2 (2.4) for term vs preterm, the mean (SD) RV longitudinal strain was −11.7 (3.1) vs −13.5 (3.6) for term vs preterm, and the RV circumferential strain was −8.3 (2.1) vs −10.8 (2.4) for term vs preterm adults.

Figure. Adult Cardiac Morphometry and Function.

Figure.

Mass index (A and D) and ejection fraction (B and E), stratified by severity of prematurity, demonstrate a statistically significant association of prematurity with biventricular mass. The left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) are hypercontractile by cardiac strain analysis, most notable in the RV, reaching peak systole and end diastole much later in the cardiac cycle (C and F). Error bars represent the SEM.

aP < .05 compared with term.

Table 3. Cardiac Strain.

Variable Adolescents Adults All
Mean (SD) P valuea Mean (SD) P valuea P valueb
Term (n = 20) Preterm (n = 20) Term (n = 32) Preterm (n = 38)
LV
Longitudinal
Strain, % –14.3 (2.2) –14.9 (2.1) .44 –12.7 (2.8) –14.2 (2.4) .04 .02
Systolic SR, % per s –78.8 (17.0) –83.7 (8.6) .50 –52.1 (13.0) –57.5 (16.0) .16 .07
Diastolic SR, % per s 63.8 (15.0) 72.9 (14.0) .08 32.2 (9.2) 37.2 (10.0) .06 .01
Circumferential
Global strain, % –19.7 (2.5) –21.1 (2.6) .17 –17.8 (2.3) –18.3 (3.4) .30 .08
Base strain, % –17.2 (3.1) –17.9 (2.2) .68 –17.0 (2.2) –17.2 (2.8) .45 .43
Mid strain, % –19.3 (2.2) –20.5 (2.2) .13 –17.9 (2.1) –18.0 (3.1) .57 .25
Apex strain, % –22.5 (4.0) –25.0 (4.3) .06 –18.4 (4.0) –19.9 (5.5) .30 .03
Systolic SR, % per s –117.0 (20.0) –129.0 (26.0) .29 –82.3 (15.0) –85.1 (19.0) .32 .07
Diastolic SR, % per s 122.0 (28.0) 134.0 (38.0) .57 77.7 (18.0) 77.5 (23.0) .95 .27
Radial
Global strain, % 29.5 (6.4) 30.8 (8.8) .76 25.8 (6.8) 27.4 (9.5) .71 .33
Base strain, % 30.4 (8.9) 33.1 (10.0) .24 26.4 (9.5) 29.0 (13.0) .50 .18
Mid strain, % 34.4 (8.4) 34.1 (9.7) .68 29.7 (8.1) 31.5 (10.0) .45 .52
Apex strain, % 23.6 (8.1) 25.4 (11.0) .88 21.4 (9.5) 21.6 (12.0) .78 .74
Long-axis strain, % 24.8 (5.0) 25.6 (5.5) .50 18.4 (8.9) 19.8 (7.5) .52 .35
Systolic SR, % per s 147.0 (32.0) 157.0 (46.0) .94 107.0 (32.0) 112.0 (42.0) .89 .34
Diastolic SR, % per s –203.0 (55.0) –225.0 (80.0) .71 –121.0 (47.0) –131.0 (58.0) .69 .16
RV
Longitudinal
Strain, % –12.6 (2.6) –12.3 (3.1) .91 –11.7 (3.1) –13.5 (3.6) .02 .13
Systolic SR, % per s –69.5 (16.0) –63.7 (15.0) .29 –51.3 (15.0) –60.4 (15.0) .01 .22
Diastolic SR, % per s 53.2 (20.0) 47.7 (19.0) .47 36.0 (15.0) 44.0 (15.0) .04 .31
Circumferential
Strain, % –9.7 (2.2) –10.1 (2.5) .68 –8.3 (2.1) –10.8 (2.4) .001 .001
Systolic SR, % per s –52.4 (14.0) –59.2 (16.0) .22 –38.0 (11.0) –48.9 (14.0) .002 .001
Diastolic SR, % per s 45.1 (13.0) 45.7 (15.0) .64 39.6 (14.0) 42.4 (14.0) .36 .45

Abbreviations: LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; SR, strain rate.

a

P values are by unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum tests within each age cohort.

b

P values are for individuals in the term and preterm groups across age cohorts by least-squares means from an age-adjusted linear model.

Sex Differences in Cardiac Structure

The MRI volumetric data were analyzed by sex using least-squares means from an age-adjusted linear model (eTable in the Supplement). Biventricular volumes (SVi) were smaller in both male and female individuals born preterm compared with the sex-specific individuals born at term (P < .05 for all). The mean (SD) LV EDVi was 94.2 (2.5) vs 80.4 (2.6) (P < .001) for male term vs preterm and 82.7 (1.9) vs 74.8 (1.7) (P = .003) for female term vs preterm. The mean (SD) LV ESVi was 40.3 (1.5) vs 33.7 (1.5) (P = .003) for male term vs preterm and 33.7 (1.0) vs 30.0 (0.9) (P = .007) for female term vs preterm. The mean (SD) LV SVi was 53.9 (1.9) vs 46.7 (1.9) (P = .01) for male term vs preterm and 48.9 (1.3) vs 44.7 (1.2) (P = .02) for female term vs preterm. The mean (SD) RV EDVi was 99.4 (3.5) vs 86.7 (3.6) (P = .02) for male term vs preterm and 84.0 (2.2) vs 74.7 (2.0) (P = .003) for female term vs preterm. The mean (SD) RV ESVi was 46.0 (2.0) vs 40.8 (2.0) (P = .08) for male term vs preterm and 36.3 (1.3) vs 30.9 (1.2) (P = .003) for female term vs preterm.

However, the magnitude of the difference between term and preterm values for SVi, LV mass index, and RV mass index appeared to be greater in male individuals compared with female individuals (13.4% vs 8.6% smaller for SVi, 21.4% vs 9.1% smaller for LV mass index, and 15.5% vs 6.8% smaller for RV mass index). This finding suggests that boys born prematurely may be more susceptible to cardiac growth arrest than girls born prematurely.

Consequences of Neonatal Characteristics

Based on previous studies8,12 identifying gestational age, total days on assisted ventilation, and patent ductus arteriosus as univariate predictors of adult pulmonary vascular disease and RV size and function, these parameters were selected a priori for multivariable analysis (Table 4). Gestational age and total days on assisted ventilation were statistically significantly associated with RV mass index, although these parameters failed to associate with LV mass index. Furthermore, gestational age was inversely associated with biventricular ejection fractions.

Table 4. Multivariable Analysis of Neonatal Predictors of Subsequent Cardiac Size and Function.

Neonatal variable Estimate (SE) P value
LV mass index
Chronological age 0.064 (0.139) .65
Gestational age 0.046 (0.585) .94
Total days on assisted ventilationa 0.061 (0.088) .49
Patent ductus arteriosus –0.036 (2.100) .99
RV mass index
Chronological age 0.157 (0.030) <.001
Gestational age 0.324 (0.128) .02
Total days on assisted ventilationa 0.038 (0.019) .05
Patent ductus arteriosus 0.502 (0.460) .28
LV ejection fraction
Chronological age 0.166 (0.103) .11
Gestational age –0.874 (0.434) .05
Total days on assisted ventilationa 0.023 (0.065) .73
Patent ductus arteriosus –3.360 (1.560) .04
RV ejection fraction
Chronological age –0.173 (0.106) .11
Gestational age –1.270 (0.447) .007
Total days on assisted ventilationa –0.056 (0.067) .41
Patent ductus arteriosus –0.423 (1.610) .79

Abbreviations: LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.

a

Total days on assisted ventilation include the combination of invasive and noninvasive ventilation.

Discussion

We hypothesized that adolescents and adults born prematurely would have altered cardiac structure and function compared with control participants in the term group, and we sought to assess to what extent previous findings7,8 of cardiac dysfunction and hypertrophy in adults born preterm would be present in 2 cohorts born during more recent eras of neonatal care. Participants were primarily from 2 birth cohorts of premature infants with very low birth weight (<1500 g) born from 1988 to 1991 or from 2003 to 2004 with characterized cardiac structure and function by MRI. Herein, we found that adolescents and young adults in the preterm group had statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size, notably without a hypertrophic response, compared with age-matched peers in the term group.

The results herein suggest that preterm birth has considerable long-term consequences on cardiac structure and function. Blunted cardiac growth and decreased biventricular cardiac chamber size after premature birth have been demonstrated across a range of birth years and postnatal ages. A small echocardiography-based study36 of 7-year-olds born extremely preterm from 1998 to 2004 demonstrated a nonsignificant suggestion of smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size and reduced LV mass index. Similarly, a larger echocardiography-based study22 of 6-year-old children born extremely preterm in 2004 to 2007 demonstrated statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size and lower mass index compared with children born at term. Among adolescents, 18-year-olds born extremely preterm in 1991 to 1992 had lower LV mass and smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size with preserved function by echocardiography compared with control participants born at term.23 These studies are consistent with our findings of lower biventricular mass and smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size by MRI in adolescent and adult cohorts born prematurely compared with participants born at term. Finally, compared with term-born controls, MRI assessment of 25-year-olds born extremely preterm in 1982 to 1985 also had reduced biventricular cardiac chamber size, but notably with biventricular hypertrophy and reduced RV ejection fraction.7,8 Given that the findings of reduced biventricular cardiac chamber size are consistent across birth years and chronological ages, a smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size should be considered a key characteristic of the premature heart, which has yet to be substantially mitigated by changes in neonatal care practice.

The reduced LV mass, hypercontractile strain pattern, and preserved ejection fractions in the present study’s population are in contrast to the higher biventricular mass, hypocontractile strain pattern, and depressed RV ejection fraction previously identified by Lewandowski et al7,8 in a similarly aged adult population born in the early 1980s. However, as noted previously, our findings are consistent with echocardiography-based studies7,8,22,23 in younger cohorts born in a more modern era of neonatal care. Lewandowski et al7,8 identified gestational age as the key determinant of biventricular mass, with 10% higher RV mass with each category of advancing severity of prematurity. Given that the adult preterm cohort in the present study was of a similar chronological age vs the cohort described by Lewandowski et al7,8 (27 vs 25 years), with an even greater degree of prematurity (29 vs 30 weeks) and a higher rate of invasive ventilation (42 of 58 [72%] vs 55 of 102 [54%]), we would have predicted a higher biventricular mass in this cohort rather than the observed lower biventricular mass. These differences are not readily explained by differences in baseline adult anthropometrics or demographics, such as obesity or hypertension. However, a notable difference between cohorts is the birth years. Lewandowski et al7,8 included individuals with birth years from 1982 to 1985, whereas the present study’s adult cohort included primarily birth years from 1988 to 1991. Although this distinction may seem subtle, the 1980s were a time of rapid change in neonatal care standards. Substantial advances include the introduction of more lung-protective ventilation, initial use of continuous pulse oximetry allowing for more rapid bedside titration of oxygen supplementation to avoid hypoxia and hyperoxia, and, by the early 1990s, the first widespread use of surfactant and antenatal corticosteroids to speed lung maturation.37 Notably, the changes in clinical practice during the 1980s were so profound that they led to a change in the presentation, pathology, and ultimately clinical classification of chronic lung disease of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The old bronchopulmonary dysplasia was characterized by lung injury from oxygen toxicity and less protective modes of invasive ventilation, whereas the new bronchopulmonary dysplasia occurs at earlier gestational ages and is considered more of an interruption of normal lung development, including arrested lung alveolar and vascular development.38,39,40 Given these parallels and changes in clinical practice, we hypothesize that old and new clinical classifications of cardiomyopathy of prematurity may exist, differentiated primarily based on the cardiac hypertrophic response, similar to and potentially corresponding to the existence of old and new clinical classifications of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Additional studies will be needed to further assess the inciting neonatal features that promote or limit the cardiac hypertrophic response over time.

Although the mechanisms by which the events surrounding preterm birth alter cardiac development later in life remain elusive, preclinical models support the paradigm of differential cardiac response and programming to neonatal stimuli. For example, changes in postnatal oxygen tension during the first postnatal week influence when cardiomyocytes exit the cell cycle, where hyperoxia may accelerate terminal cell cycle arrest, whereas hypoxia prolongs the postnatal proliferative window.41 Furthermore, reactive oxygen species are known to activate a number of hypertrophy-signaling kinases and transcription factors. These responses may be further potentiated by mechanical stress, including ventilation,42,43,44 and could account for the greater hypertrophic response reported by Lewandowski et al.7,8 Preterm birth without the secondary insult of oxygen supplementation also is associated with an altered cardiac phenotype. In an animal model of premature birth using sheep born at 0.9 of term in which respiratory support was not required, lambs demonstrated biventricular hypertrophy at 9 weeks after term-equivalent age (infancy), with a greater proportion of immature mononucleated polyploidy (4N) cardiomyocytes.45 However, this same author group reported in a subsequent study46 that by age 14.5 months (early adulthood), heart weight and RV wall thickness in sheep were less with fewer cardiomyocytes than in animals born at term.

Strengths and Limitations

A strength of this study is the use of 2 neonatal cohorts to understand the consequences of age on cardiac structure and function after preterm birth. Although both age groups born preterm had a smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size compared with participants born at term, the hypercontractile state was most notable in adults born prematurely, with the RV more altered than the LV. At least 2 potential explanations for this finding exist. First, this result could be attributable to differences in neonatal care, such as lack of treatment with antenatal corticosteroids and longer use of invasive ventilation in the adult cohort, although our adolescent and adult cohorts were otherwise well matched with respect to gestational age, birth weight, total days on assisted ventilation, and days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Second, it is plausible that we have identified the natural progression of prematurity-associated cardiomyopathy with age. Support for this explanation also comes from our group’s previous experience in animal models.47,48,49,50 Specifically, treatment of neonatal rat pups with hyperoxia for the first 10 to 14 days after birth, a well-established model of moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, resulted in bimodal RV dysfunction.47 By early adolescence, the RV was well adapted to mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension and equally or even more tolerant to secondary stressors, such as pulmonary artery banding and hypoxia.47,48,49 However, when rats exposed to neonatal hyperoxia were aged to 1 year, they developed RV failure secondary to impaired mitochondrial biogenesis and function, despite no further progression of the underlying pulmonary vascular disease.47,50 Therefore, the hypercontractile RV may represent an early compensatory response to maintain RV-pulmonary vascular coupling, which our group has recently identified as impaired relative to term-born controls in a small cohort of adults born moderately to extremely preterm.15

Although this study is strengthened by the inclusion of the 2 well-characterized neonatal cohorts, which allows for a better understanding of the consequences of premature birth for cardiac function over the first 3 decades of life, this study has some limitations. First, a primary limitation is the cross-sectional cohort study design, which suggests but cannot confirm differences in cardiac growth potential across 2 age groups born prematurely, and there may be additional unaccounted-for confounders. Second, a small number of individuals who were born prematurely was studied, although the numbers were higher than those enrolled in the extreme preterm category by Lewandowski et al7,8 because their study included all degrees of prematurity. Future work in identifying mechanistic insight into increased heart failure and ischemic risk in survivors of preterm birth is warranted and may benefit from focus on myocardial perfusion, fibrosis, metabolism, and function during stress.

Conclusions

Compared with individuals who were born at term, adolescents and young adults born moderately to extremely preterm during an era consistent with modern neonatal practice had statistically significantly smaller biventricular cardiac chamber size with preserved function, notably without a hypertrophic response. Cardiac strain analyses identified a hypercontractile heart, particularly in the RV, in adults born prematurely. Whether these parameters ultimately predict long-term risk of cardiac dysfunction remains to be determined.

Supplement.

eTable. Ventricular Volumes and Mass in Males and Females Born Preterm Compared With the Sex-Specific Term-Born Individuals

References

  • 1.Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162-2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferré C, Callaghan W, Olson C, Sharma A, Barfield W. Effects of maternal age and age-specific preterm birth rates on overall preterm birth rates: United States, 2007 and 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(43):1181-1184. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6543a1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gough A, Spence D, Linden M, Halliday HL, McGarvey LPA. General and respiratory health outcomes in adult survivors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review. Chest. 2012;141(6):1554-1567. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raju TNK, Buist AS, Blaisdell CJ, Moxey-Mims M, Saigal S. Adults born preterm: a review of general health and system-specific outcomes. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106(9):1409-1437. doi: 10.1111/apa.13880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raju TNK, Pemberton VL, Saigal S, Blaisdell CJ, Moxey-Mims M, Buist S; Adults Born Preterm Conference Speakers and Discussants . Long-term healthcare outcomes of preterm birth: an executive summary of a conference sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. J Pediatr. 2017;181:309-318.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Irving RJ, Belton NR, Elton RA, Walker BR. Adult cardiovascular risk factors in premature babies. Lancet. 2000;355(9221):2135-2136. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02384-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lewandowski AJ, Augustine D, Lamata P, et al. Preterm heart in adult life: cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals distinct differences in left ventricular mass, geometry, and function. Circulation. 2013;127(2):197-206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.126920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lewandowski AJ, Bradlow WM, Augustine D, et al. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction in young adults born preterm. Circulation. 2013;128(7):713-720. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haraldsdottir K, Watson AM, Goss KN, et al. Impaired autonomic function in adolescents born preterm. Physiol Rep. 2018;6(6):e13620. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Jong F, Monuteaux MC, van Elburg RM, Gillman MW, Belfort MB. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm birth and later systolic blood pressure. Hypertension. 2012;59(2):226-234. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.181784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hovi P, Vohr B, Ment LR, et al. ; APIC Adults Born Preterm International Collaboration . Blood pressure in young adults born at very low birth weight: Adults Born Preterm International Collaboration. Hypertension. 2016;68(4):880-887. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goss KN, Beshish AG, Barton GP, et al. Early pulmonary vascular disease in young adults born preterm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(12):1549-1558. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2016OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Naumburg E, Axelsson I, Huber D, Söderström L. Some neonatal risk factors for adult pulmonary arterial hypertension remain unknown. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(11):1104-1108. doi: 10.1111/apa.13205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naumburg E, Söderström L, Huber D, Axelsson I. Risk factors for pulmonary arterial hypertension in children and young adults. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(5):636-641. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mulchrone A, Bellofiore A, Douwes JM, et al. Impaired right ventricular–vascular coupling in young adults born preterm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(5):615-618. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0767LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hui LL, Lam HS, Leung GM, Schooling CM. Late prematurity and adiposity in adolescents: evidence from “Children of 1997” birth cohort. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(11):2309-2314. doi: 10.1002/oby.21267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parkinson JR, Hyde MJ, Gale C, Santhakumaran S, Modi N. Preterm birth and the metabolic syndrome in adult life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):e1240-e1263. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sipola-Leppänen M, Vääräsmäki M, Tikanmäki M, et al. Cardiometabolic risk factors in young adults who were born preterm. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(11):861-873. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carr H, Cnattingius S, Granath F, Ludvigsson JF, Edstedt Bonamy AK. Preterm birth and risk of heart failure up to early adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(21):2634-2642. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crump C, Howell EA, Stroustrup A, McLaughlin MA, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Association of preterm birth with risk of ischemic heart disease in adulthood. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(8):736-743. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Larsson SC, Drca N, Jensen-Urstad M, Wolk A. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in relation to birth weight and preterm birth. Int J Cardiol. 2015;178:149-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mohlkert LA, Hallberg J, Broberg O, et al. The preterm heart in childhood: left ventricular structure, geometry, and function assessed by echocardiography in 6-year-old survivors of periviable births. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(2):e007742. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kowalski RR, Beare R, Doyle LW, Smolich JJ, Cheung MM; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group . Elevated blood pressure with reduced left ventricular and aortic dimensions in adolescents born extremely preterm. J Pediatr. 2016;172:75-80.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zivanovic S, Pushparajah K, Calvert S, et al. Pulmonary artery pressures in school-age children born prematurely. J Pediatr. 2017;191:42-49.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huckstep OJ, Williamson W, Telles F, et al. Physiological stress elicits impaired left ventricular function in preterm-born adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(12):1347-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Palta M, Gabbert D, Fryback D, et al. Development and validation of an index for scoring baseline respiratory disease in the very low birth weight neonate: Severity Index Development and Validation Panels and Newborn Lung Project. Pediatrics. 1990;86(5):714-721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Palta M, Gabbert D, Weinstein MR, Peters ME, Newborn Lung P. Multivariate assessment of traditional risk factors for chronic lung disease in very low birth weight neonates: the Newborn Lung Project. J Pediatr. 1991;119(2):285-292. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80746-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Palta M, Weinstein MR, McGuinness G, Gabbert D, Brady W, Peters ME. A population study: mortality and morbidity after availability of surfactant therapy: Newborn Lung Project. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148(12):1295-1301. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170120057009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weinstein MR, Peters ME, Sadek M, Palta M. A new radiographic scoring system for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Newborn Lung Project. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994;18(5):284-289. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950180504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hagen EW, Sadek-Badawi M, Albanese A, Palta M. A comparison of Wisconsin neonatal intensive care units with national data on outcomes and practices. WMJ. 2008;107(7):320-326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Palta M, Sadek-Badawi M. PedsQL relates to function and behavior in very low and normal birth weight 2- and 3-year-olds from a regional cohort. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(5):691-700. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9346-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hagen EW, Sadek-Badawi M, Palta M. Daycare attendance and risk for respiratory morbidity among young very low birth weight children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009;44(11):1093-1099. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Heyde B, Jasaityte R, Barbosa D, et al. Elastic image registration versus speckle tracking for 2-D myocardial motion estimation: a direct comparison in vivo. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32(2):449-459. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2230114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Published 2017. Accessed April 14, 2020. https://www.r-project.org
  • 36.Morsing E, Liuba P, Fellman V, Maršál K, Brodszki J. Cardiovascular function in children born very preterm after intrauterine growth restriction with severely abnormal umbilical artery blood flow. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(10):1257-1266. doi: 10.1177/2047487313486044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Berger TM, Fontana M, Stocker M. The journey towards lung protective respiratory support in preterm neonates. Neonatology. 2013;104(4):265-274. doi: 10.1159/000354419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Day CL, Ryan RM. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: new becomes old again! Pediatr Res. 2017;81(1-2):210-213. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Northway WH., Jr Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: twenty-five years later. Pediatrics. 1992;89(5, pt 1):969-973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(7):1723-1729. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Puente BN, Kimura W, Muralidhar SA, et al. The oxygen-rich postnatal environment induces cardiomyocyte cell-cycle arrest through DNA damage response [published correction appears in Cell. 2014;157(5):1243]. Cell. 2014;157(3):565-579. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Takimoto E, Kass DA. Role of oxidative stress in cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling. Hypertension. 2007;49(2):241-248. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000254415.31362.a7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Buggisch M, Ateghang B, Ruhe C, et al. Stimulation of ES-cell–derived cardiomyogenesis and neonatal cardiac cell proliferation by reactive oxygen species and NADPH oxidase. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(pt 5):885-894. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aikawa R, Nagai T, Tanaka M, et al. Reactive oxygen species in mechanical stress–induced cardiac hypertrophy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;289(4):901-907. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bensley JG, Stacy VK, De Matteo R, Harding R, Black MJ. Cardiac remodelling as a result of pre-term birth: implications for future cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(16):2058-2066. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mrocki MM, Nguyen VB, Lombardo P, et al. Moderate preterm birth affects right ventricular structure and function and pulmonary artery blood flow in adult sheep. J Physiol. 2018;596(23):5965-5975. doi: 10.1113/JP275654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kumari S, Braun RK, Tetri LH, Barton GP, Hacker TA, Goss KN. Bimodal right ventricular dysfunction after postnatal hyperoxia exposure: implications for the preterm heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;317(6):H1272-H1281. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00383.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Goss KN, Cucci AR, Fisher AJ, et al. Neonatal hyperoxic lung injury favorably alters adult right ventricular remodeling response to chronic hypoxia exposure. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;308(8):L797-L806. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00276.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Goss KN, Tepper RS, Lahm T, Ahlfeld SK. Increased cardiac output and preserved gas exchange despite decreased alveolar surface area in rats exposed to neonatal hyperoxia and adult hypoxia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;53(6):902-906. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0100LE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Goss KN, Kumari S, Tetri LH, et al. Postnatal hyperoxia exposure durably impairs right ventricular function and mitochondrial biogenesis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017;56(5):609-619. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0256OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eTable. Ventricular Volumes and Mass in Males and Females Born Preterm Compared With the Sex-Specific Term-Born Individuals


Articles from JAMA Cardiology are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES