Abstract
Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is upregulated in atherosclerotic lesions and it may promote the progression of atherosclerosis, but the mechanisms behind this process are not completely understood. We previously showed that the phosphorylation of Akt within THP-1 macrophages is increased in response to the lipid hydrolysis products generated by LPL from total lipoproteins. Notably, the free fatty acid (FFA) component was responsible for this effect. In the present study, we aimed to reveal more detail as to how the FFA component may affect Akt signalling. We show that the phosphorylation of Akt within THP-1 macrophages increases with total FFA concentration and that phosphorylation is elevated up to 18 hours. We further show that specifically the palmitoleate component of the total FFA affects Akt phosphorylation. This is tied with changes to the levels of select molecular species of phosphoinositides. We further show that the total FFA component, and specifically palmitoleate, reduces apolipoprotein A-I-mediated cholesterol efflux, and that the reduction can be reversed in the presence of the Akt inhibitor MK-2206. Overall, our data support a negative role for the FFA component of lipoprotein hydrolysis products generated by LPL, by impairing macrophage cholesterol efflux via Akt activation.
Introduction
Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is an extracellular enzyme required for the hydrolysis of triacylglycerols (TAG), and to a much lesser extent phospholipids, from TAG-rich lipoproteins within the bloodstream [1,2]. LPL is anchored to the outside of the endothelial cells lining the luminal surface of capillaries in several tissues via heparan sulfate proteoglycans [3–5], and as a head-to-tail homodimer to glycerophosphatidylinositol high-density lipoprotein binding protein-1 [6]. LPL is expressed by several tissues, including adipose, skeletal, cardiac, breast, adrenal tissues, and also macrophages [3,4]. In addition to its catalytic function, LPL also actively facilitates the uptake of lipoproteins and lipid hydrolysis products independently of catalytic activity, via a bridging function that brings the lipoproteins closer to the cell [7].
The expression of LPL is elevated in macrophages residing within atherosclerotic plaques, and its expression is positively correlated to the cholesterol content of the cells [8,9]. In apolipoprotein E-null (apoE-/-) mice, the transgenic expression of human LPL accelerated atherosclerotic lesion formation [10]. Conversely, when apoE-/- mice were treated with miR-590 (which can inhibit macrophage LPL expression), lesion formation was prevented [11]. In THP-1 macrophages, the lentiviral overexpression of the long non-coding RNA DAPK1-IT1 suppressed miR-590 expression, which in turn increased LPL expression and increased cholesterol accumulation [12]. Though all of the mechanisms by which macrophage LPL contributes to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis are not yet known, it has roles in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, smooth muscle cell recruitment, and it contributes to the lipid uptake of macrophages as part of their transition to lipid-laden foam cells [13–15].
Previous work in our laboratory aimed to characterize the lipid species produced from the hydrolysis of total human lipoproteins by LPL, and it was demonstrated that the LPL hydrolysis products resulted in the phosphorylation of nine major signalling nodes and receptor tyrosine kinases within THP-1 human macrophages after 30 minutes [16]. The treatment of THP-1 macrophages with the total free fatty acid (FFA) component of the LPL hydrolysis products resulted in the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (also named Akt), but none of the other signalling nodes and receptor tyrosine kinases [16]. It was postulated that one or more of the FFA liberated by LPL generated a molecular species of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) that preferentially activated Akt [16]. Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that is downstream of phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity [17,18]. The activation of Akt involves two principal phosphorylation sites: Ser-473 in the regulatory region and Thr-308 in the active site [19]. Akt itself is a kinase that can phosphorylate a variety of downstream proteins with a range of possible functions [18]. For example, Akt phosphorylates tuberous sclerosis factor 2 (TSC2), which inactivates it and prevents it from inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1; as a result, the anti-atherogenic process of cholesterol efflux is impaired [20].
We have also previously shown that the hydrolysis products liberated from total lipoproteins by LPL, and notably the total FFA component, impaired the gene expression of the cholesterol efflux transporters ATP binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1), ATP binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1), and scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI) within THP-1 macrophages after 18 hours [21]; in addition, cholesterol efflux to apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) was impaired [21]. Because the total FFA component of lipoprotein hydrolysis products generated by LPL increases the levels of phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) [16] and it inhibits cholesterol efflux [21], and the inhibition of Akt improves cholesterol efflux [20], we suspected that Akt was a key intermediate in the mechanism by which LPL impairs cholesterol efflux. Thus, we hypothesized that one or more specific fatty acids that exist within the total FFA component of lipoprotein hydrolysis products that are generated by LPL impair cholesterol efflux through the activation of Akt. To test this hypothesis, using THP-1 macrophages, we examined the activation of Akt in response to various FFA mixtures that contain the concentrations of FFA species that we previously reported to be found within LPL hydrolysis products from total lipoproteins [16]. We identified that palmitoleate significantly increased Akt phosphorylation. We thus examined cholesterol efflux in response to incubations with palmitoleate and the Akt inhibitor MK-2206. Lastly, we examined the molecular species of phosphoinositides (PIPx) of THP-1 macrophages treated with palmitoleate, to determine if there were changes to select PIPx species that may contribute to a preferential activation of Akt.
Results
We previously showed using antibody arrays that the hydrolysis products liberated by LPL from total lipoproteins (ρ<1.21 g/ml), as well as the reconstituted total FFA component matching that liberated by LPL at a physiological concentration of 0.68 mM, significantly increased the phosphorylation of Akt after 30 minutes within THP-1 macrophages [16]. In a follow up to these previous observations, we first examined the phosphorylation of Akt within THP-1 macrophages in response to the reconstituted total FFA component matching that liberated by LPL at 0.68 mM, over a time course between 10 minutes and 18 hours. Relative to the vehicle controls for each time point, the percentage of phosphorylation of Ser-473 on Akt was higher, with maximal phosphorylation of 204% observed at 20 minutes (uncorrected p = 0.03) (Fig 1A). Following a Bonferroni-Dunn correction on all points that were significant by multiple t-testing alone, only the 2 hour time point retained significance (with corrected p = 0.004). Relative to the vehicle controls for each time point, the percentage of phosphorylation of Thr-308 on Akt reached a maximum of 226% at 15 minutes (uncorrected p = 0.02) (S1 Fig); however, the phosphorylation returned to control levels by 30 minutes. Following a Bonferroni-Dunn correction on all points that were significant by multiple t-testing alone, none of the time points retained significance. Using the 2 hour time point because it retains significance following correction, we examined the phosphorylation of Akt in response to different concentrations of the FFA mixture. Relative to the vehicle control-treated cells, the percentage of Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473 increased in a dose-dependent fashion with FFA mixture concentrations of 0.17 mM, 0.34 mM, 0.68 mM, and 1.36 mM (Fig 1B).
Having clearly established that Akt phosphorylation was affected by the reconstituted total FFA mixture that matched our previously reported concentrations of FFA species that are liberated by LPL from total lipoproteins, we sought to examine which class of fatty acid within the total FFA mixture might be responsible for the phosphorylation of Akt. We prepared mixtures solely containing the saturated fatty acid (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) components of the total FFA mixture, we and tested their ability to phosphorylate Akt within THP-1 macrophages. We chose a 2 hour incubation period because it retains significance following correction (Fig 1A). Our data show that only the MUFA mixture significantly increased the phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473 by 217% of control levels during a 2 hour period (p<0.05), which was comparable to the total FFA mixture (at 196% of control levels) (Fig 2A). We next tested the effect of oleate and palmitoleate, the two components of the MUFA mixture, on the phosphorylation of Akt; we show that only palmitoleate was able to significantly promote the phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473, by 153% of control levels (p<0.05) (Fig 2B).
We previously postulated that the FFA component from lipoprotein hydrolysis products may be generating one or more specific species of PIP3 that preferentially lead to the downstream activation of Akt [16]. Because the MUFA component of the total FFA mixture, and specifically palmitoleate, resulted in the significant phosphorylation of Akt, we examined if palmitoleate would indeed alter the levels of select species of PIPx within THP-1 macrophages over an 18 hour period. We chose this time period because we previously showed it was a sufficient period for the total FFA to impair cholesterol efflux [21]. No significant changes were observed for all assessed species of phosphatidylinositol (PI)–(34:1, 36:0, 36:1, 36:2, 38:3, and 38:4) (Fig 3A), and for all assessed species of phosphatidylinositol monophosphate (PIP)–(36:1, 36:2, 38:3, and 38:4) (Fig 3B). However, there were notable changes in select phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate (PIP2) and PIP3 species. Specifically, compared to control treatment, the treatment with palmitoleate increased the levels of the PIP2 species 34:1 by 138% (p = 0.006) and 34:2 PIP2 by 375% (p<0.0001) (Fig 3C), while the PIP3 species 36:1 decreased levels to 55% of control (p = 0.006) but the PIP3 species 34:2 levels increased by 192% (p = 0.005) (Fig 3D).
As we previously showed that the total FFA mixture impaired cholesterol efflux to apoA-I in THP-1 macrophages [21], we sought to determine if impaired cholesterol efflux was in part due to the phosphorylation of Akt. We examined cholesterol efflux to apoA-I in the absence or presence of the Akt-specific inhibitor MK-2206, which abolishes Akt phosphorylation within THP-1 macrophages at a concentration of 1 μM (S2 Fig). Cholesterol efflux to apoA-I was assessed after an 18 hour incubation of cells with the total FFA mixture in the absence or presence of MK-2206, or a vehicle control. As expected, the total FFA treatment reduced the efflux of [3H]cholesterol by 35% compared to control levels (p<0.001) (Fig 4A). Cholesterol efflux was restored to control levels in the presence of MK-2206. Lastly, we tested cholesterol efflux after an 18 hour incubation with each MUFA component, oleate and palmitoleate, in the absence or presence of MK-2206, or a vehicle control. Of note, oleate was at a 10.2-fold higher concentration versus palmitoleate. While oleate did not significantly affect cholesterol efflux (Fig 4B), palmitoleate significantly reduced cholesterol efflux by 31% compared to control levels (p<0.05); again, cholesterol efflux was restored to control levels in the presence of MK-2206. We also examined cholesterol efflux from THP-1 macrophages to HDL, and from acetylated LDL-treated THP-1 macrophages to both apoA-I and HDL, after an 18 hour incubation with palmitoleate; again, palmitoleate significantly reduced cholesterol efflux (S3 Fig). To our surprise, although we previously showed that the total FFA mixture reduced the gene expression of the cholesterol transporters ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI [21], immunoblot analyses showed that the treatment of cells with palmitoleate, or palmitoleate plus MK-2206, did not affect protein expression (S4 Fig).
Discussion
In this study, we assessed the impact on Akt phosphorylation and cholesterol efflux by the total FFA component that is derived from the hydrolysis of total lipoproteins by LPL. We show that the concentration of palmitoleate that is found within the total FFA component increased Akt phosphorylation and reduced apoA-I-mediated cholesterol efflux (S5 Fig)–an effect that was reversed by inhibiting Akt phosphorylation. The effect on cholesterol efflux to apoA-I and HDL was surprisingly independent of the protein expression for ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI. Collectively, these data point toward an unknown mechanism that negatively influences the anti-atherogenic process of cholesterol efflux.
Akt is a ‘master kinase’ with over 100 unique downstream substrates and clearly defined roles in a variety of functions, such as cell growth and proliferation, insulin response, and angiogenesis [17]. As such, there are a myriad of pathways that could be influenced by a change in Akt phosphorylation status, some of which have implications in atherogenic processes. For example, increased Akt activation within human umbilical vein endothelial cells by tumor necrosis factor-α leads to the increased expression and secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, a protein involved in the recruitment of monocytes to a developing atherosclerotic lesion area [22]. Akt also phosphorylates TSC2, which in turn prevents it from inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 and ultimately impairing cholesterol efflux; similar to our work, cholesterol efflux was improved in the presence of the Akt inhibitor 10-[4’-(N,N-diethylamino)butyl]-2-chlorophenoxazine hydrochloride [20]. While in vitro studies exist to suggest that Akt phosphorylation may be pro-atherogenic in nature, in vivo studies have not provided a clear role for Akt in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. Mice lacking both apolipoprotein E (apoE) and Akt exhibit a more severe atherosclerotic phenotype versus mice lacking only apoE [23]. However, the absence of Akt in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice did not further influence lesion development [24]. Furthermore, mice lacking apoE display larger atherosclerotic plaque sizes and higher levels of phosphorylated Akt versus mice lacking both apoE and the p110γ subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), which prevented Akt phosphorylation [25]. It may be possible that Akt and select downstream pathways play both protective and promotive roles in atherosclerosis, that may be dependent on the stage of development. This will require more careful future examination in vitro and in vivo.
Perhaps the most interesting finding from our study was that palmitoleate was sufficient to induce the activation of Akt in the THP-1 macrophages and the inhibition of apoA-I- and HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux, while oleate at a 10.2-fold higher concentration failed to significantly affect these processes. We speculated that palmitoleate may reduce the expression of the cholesterol transporters ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI; however, immunoblot analyses showed no changes with transporter expression. Future studies are necessary to examine why HDL-mediated efflux was impaired. Given that the mobilization of free cholesterol from lipid droplets via autophagy upstream of the ABCA1 transporter can be rate-limiting for cholesterol efflux to apoA-I [26,27], one likely possibility is that Akt activation impairs this process. Interestingly, Akt inhibition was shown to increase ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux to apoA-I through supressing mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) [20]. Conversely, Akt activation by total FFA would be expected to increase mTORC1, which negatively regulates autophagy [28], therefore leading to reduced autophagy-mediated lipid droplet-associated cholesteryl ester catabolism, reduced ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux to apoA-I, and cytosolic lipid droplet accumulation. This remains to be investigated. It is possible that other unsaturated fatty acids, such as arachidonate, docosahexaenoate, and eicosapentaenoate, inhibit cholesterol efflux through a similar mechanism, as these have been reported to impede apoA-I-mediated efflux [29]. We failed to show an effect with our PUFA mixture on Akt phosphorylation, but this may be due to differences in concentrations between the latter report and our current study, and potential differences in fatty acid metabolism between cell models.
Although there were no changes with protein expression, we previously reported that ABCA1, ABCG1, and SCARB1 mRNA were reduced in response to the total FFA mixture [21]. However, an examination of the expression of the genes encoding these transporters, in the presence of the total FFA mixture without or with the Akt inhibitor MK-2206, showed no difference of expression (S6 Fig). This is consistent with the findings of Huang et al. [30], who found that Akt plays no role on the gene expression of cholesterol transporters in the HepG2 human hepatoma cell line. We also previously postulated that specific PIP3 species may be generated to preferentially activate Akt [16]. In the current study, an examination of THP-1 macrophage PIPx in the absence or presence of palmitoleate FFA did reveal differences. Although acyl chain fingerprinting was not performed, the 34:2 species of PIP3 that is increased in THP-1 macrophages treated with palmitoleate may likely represent the incorporation of both palmitoleate and oleate. Also reflecting this increase is the significant increase of the 34:2 PIP2 species. We also observed a significant increase of the 34:1 PIP2 species, which may represent the incorporation of stearate and palmitoleate; this is supported by the modest (but not significant) elevation of the 34:1 PI species. Because the evaluation of PIPx was on samples following an 18 hour incubation, it is possible that an earlier time point may have exhibited a more pronounced increase of select PIPx species in response to palmitoleate, and also a likely elevation of 34:1 PIP3, which we did not observe. However, while there remains more to elucidate about the mechanism of activation, these data provide clues to specific species of PIPx that may preferentially influence the PI3K-Akt pathway and cholesterol efflux–a focus of future investigation that is beyond the scope of the current study.
In a 2009 meta-analysis evaluating the effects of certain types of fats on cardiovascular outcomes, it was suggested that replacing the SFA in the diet with PUFA or MUFA could improve outcomes [31]. The authors’ hypothesis was initially that either MUFA or PUFA could improve cardiovascular disease risk when compared to SFA, but they surprisingly found no association with MUFA. The authors indicated that the source of dietary MUFA was primarily derived from animal fat, and they suggested that it was a possible confounding factor in their conclusions [31]. However, our data suggest that MUFA incorporation into atherosclerotic plaques may actually be an accelerating factor by partially inhibiting cholesterol efflux. In fact, the rate of degradation of ABCA1 was shown to be increased in two different mouse macrophage models in the presence of unsaturated fatty acids [32]. What remains to be tested is how the impaired cholesterol efflux in response to a palmitoleate-enriched diet would translate into reverse cholesterol transport functionality in vivo.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that palmitoleate increases Akt phosphorylation in THP-1 macrophages and reduces apoA-I-mediated cholesterol efflux through a mechanism mediated by Akt. It is possible that other macrophage cell lines that do not require phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for differentiation exhibit the same phenomenon, but this remains to be examined. The likely accumulation of sterols in response to the total FFA mixture is further supported by work in our laboratory showing that the inhibition of PI3K reduces FFA-mediated neutral lipid accumulation in our model (S7 Fig). Of note, the total FFA mixture we used was derived from the concentration of FFA species that we previously reported are from total lipoproteins in the presence of LPL. These lipoproteins, and our subsequently tested FFA concentrations, were based on lipoproteins isolated from normolipidemic subjects. In the future, it would be of interest to examine the response of the PI3K-Akt pathway using lipoproteins, and the FFA component liberated by LPL, from subjects with controlled and uncontrolled hyperlipidemia; samples from such subjects might exhibit unique lipoprotein lipidomes that may impair cholesterol efflux in response to LPL hydrolysis, in addition to harboring high-density lipoproteins with poor cholesterol efflux capacity.
Materials and methods
Preparation of free fatty acid mixtures
A total FFA mixture matching concentrations that we previously reported to be liberated by LPL during hydrolysis of total lipoproteins was prepared as previously described [16,21]. Briefly, myristate, palmitoleate, palmitate, linoleate, oleate, stearate, arachidonate, and docosahexaenoate (all purchased from Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN, USA) were stored until needed at -20°C under N2(g) as 10 mg/ml solutions in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry grade methanol (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada). Prior to preparation of FFA mixtures, stock FFA were brought to room temperature. To prepare 1 ml media with 0.68 mM total FFA for cell culture, 18.6 nmol myristate, 23.7 nmol palmitoleate, 275.0 nmol palmitate, 70.0 nmol linoleate, 241.8 nmol oleate, 45.4 nmol stearate, 0.9 nmol arachidonate, and 0.4 nmol docosahexaenoate were removed from stock solutions and the methanol evaporated at 35°C under N2(g); the fatty acids were resuspended in 30 μl dimethylsulfoxide. The fatty acid/dimethylsulfoxide mixture or 30 μl dimethylsulfoxide (as vehicle control) was added at a rate of 1 μl/min to 990 μl RPMI-1640 (cat. #SH30255.01, Fisher Scientific) medium containing 0.2% w/v fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (FAF-BSA, Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% v/v antibiotic/antimycotic (A/A, Fisher Scientific), and 100 nM PMA (Millipore Sigma) while continuously vortexing. Media containing only SFA (18.6 nmol myristate, 275.0 nmol palmitate, and 45.4 nmol stearate), only MUFA (23.7 nmol palmitoleate and 241.8 nmol oleate), and only PUFA (70.0 nmol linoleate, 0.9 nmol arachidonate, and 0.4 nmol docosahexaenoate), were similarly prepared. The FFA mixtures were used to treat THP-1 macrophages (described below).
Treatment of THP-1 macrophages with FFA mixtures
THP-1 human monocytic leukemia cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in T75 flasks with RPMI, which was further supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (cat. #SH30396.03, Fisher Scientific) and 1% v/v A/A. The cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2(g). To differentiate cells into macrophages, THP-1 cells were seeded into each well of a 6-well plate at a density of 3.86 x 105 cells/ml in RPMI containing 10% v/v fetal bovine serum, 1% v/v A/A, and 100 nM PMA. After 48 hours, cells were washed three times with RPMI, then incubated with RPMI containing 0.2% w/v FAF-BSA, 1% v/v A/A, and 100 nM PMA. After 24 hours, cells were washed three times with RPMI, then incubated for 2 hours (unless otherwise stated) with 1 ml of media containing FFA (prepared as described above), or the vehicle control media. Following incubation, cells were washed three times with 2 ml ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.0). Cells were lysed on ice for 15 minutes with a commercial buffer (#98038, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), supplemented with 0.1% v/v protease/phosphatase inhibitor (#5872S, Cell Signaling Technology); cells were collected and stored at -80°C until needed. Prior to use, the protein content of cell lysates was quantified using a bicinchonic acid protein assay kit (Fisher Scientific), according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunoblotting
Proteins (5 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE using 12% resolving gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. For ABCA1, 60 μg of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE using 8% resolving gels. Following transfer, the membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) at pH 7.4, containing 5% w/v bovine serum albumin (BSA, Millipore Sigma), 0.05% v/v Tween-20 (Fisher Scientific), and 0.05% w/v NaN3 (Fisher Scientific). After blocking, the membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with antibodies against human Akt (1:1,000 dilution of cat. #9272, Cell Signaling Technology), Ser-473 phosphorylated human Akt (1:2,000 dilution of cat. #4060, Cell Signaling Technology), Thr-308 phosphorylated human Akt (1:2,000 dilution of cat. #2965S, Cell Signaling Technology), human ABCA1 (1:500 dilution of cat. #NB400-105, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA), human ABCG1 (1:1,000 dilution of cat. #NB400-132, Novus Biologicals), human SR-BI (1:500 dilution of cat. #NB400-104, Novus Biologicals), or human β-actin (1:5,000 dilution of cat. #NB600-501, Novus Biologicals). All primary antibodies were diluted with TBS containing 5% BSA, 0.05% v/v Tween-20, 0.05% w/v NaN3. Following incubation, membranes were washed four times with TBS containing 0.05% v/v Tween-20, then incubated for 2 hours with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies against rabbit IgG to detect Akt, pAkt, ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI (1:2,000 dilution of cat. #SA1-200, Fisher Scientific) or mouse IgG to detect β-actin (1:2,000 dilution of cat. #SA1-100, Fisher Scientific). Following incubation, membranes were washed four times with TBS, then visualized using an ImageQuant LAS 4000 system (GE Healthcare, Baie d’Ufre, QC, Canada) following development using the ECL™ Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare), according to manufacturer’s protocol. The densitometry of protein bands was quantified using ImageJ [33].
Cholesterol efflux assays
ApoA-I (Lee Biosolutions, Maryland Heights, MO, USA) was salt-exchanged using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline, and the protein concentration was measured using the absorbance at 280 nm and the molar absorption coefficient of 1.23 ml/ mg·cm [34]. Cholesterol efflux assays using THP-1 macrophages were carried out as previously described [21]. In brief, cells were cultured in 12-well plates and radiolabelled with 1 μCi/ml [3H]cholesterol (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Following labelling, cells were incubated for 18 hours with media containing either fatty acid (0.68 mM total fatty acid mixture, 23.7 μM palmitoleate, or 241.8 μM oleate) or vehicle control, in the absence or presence of 1 μM the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 (Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA). After incubation without or with fatty acid, cells were incubated without or with 25 μg/ml apoA-I for 6 hours. After 6 hours, media were collected and cells were lysed using 1 ml of 0.2 M NaOH for 30 minutes; [3H]cholesterol from media and cell lysates were quantified by scintillation counting. The amount of [3H]cholesterol effluxed was calculated as a percentage of [3H]cholesterol effluxed into the medium per amount of total cell and medium [3H]cholesterol. Background efflux (in the absence of apoA-I) was subtracted from efflux data to obtain apoA-I specific efflux.
Mass spectrometry
PI, PIP, PIP2, and PIP3 were analyzed as previously described [35]. In brief, lipids were extracted from cell pellets with acidified solvents prior to derivatization with diazomethyltimethylsilane. Dry derivatized lipid extracts were dissolved in 100 μl methanol (80% aqueous solution) prior to liquid chromatography separation with mass spectrometry detection using an Acquity UPLC system system hyphenated to a QTRAP 4000 mass spectrometer (Waters, Wilmslow, U.K). The mobile phase consisted of a linear gradient from 45% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid in water, changing over 20 minutes to 90% acetonitrile with 0.1% of formic acid in water. The column used was a Waters BEH 300 C4 (100 × 1.0 mm), 1.7 μm. The areas of the total ion current of each PIP, PIP2 and PIP3 lipid molecular species were corrected for recovery to internal standard. The reported data were normalized to the recovery of the PI content.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.2. An unpaired Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison post-test were used, unless otherwise stated. A p<0.05 was considered significantly different. Unless otherwise stated, all data are given as mean ± SD.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors with to thank Greg West (The Babraham Institute) for his excellent technical assistance, and Catherine Wright (University of Washington) for her recommended statistical analyses of select data.
In memoriam: Michael J. O. Wakelam (1955–2020)
During the review of the revised version of our manuscript, Michael Wakelam passed away on March 31, 2020 due to complications from a suspected COVID-19 infection. It is not easy to say “Michael Wakelam was” because his legacy as a person, scientist, Professor, parent, husband, colleague, and friend is still very much alive. It has been only a month of Michael’s passing away and it is impossible to imagine The Babraham Institute without him. Michael’s directorship as well as wisdom, dedication, loyalty, devotion to science and to the people, made the Institute a lovely place to work in. Michael’s passion for lipidomics and mass spectrometry extended his scientific collaborations beyond The Babraham Institute to lots of groups in the United Kingdom, and internationally. This publication reflects Michael’s excitement for validated data, his firm believe in frontier research, and more importantly collaborating to push knowledge forward. He truly will be missed, Andrea F. Lopez-Clavijo.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (402185-2011-RGPIN and RGPIN-2018-05359 to RJB), an Operating Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PTJ-391187 to MO), and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK (BBSRC - BB/P013384/1 to MJOW).
References
- 1.Nicoll A & Lewis B. Evaluation of the roles of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase in lipoprotein metabolism: in vivo and in vitro studies in man. Eur J Clin Invest. 1980;10(6):487–495. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1980.tb02090.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McCoy MG, Sun GS, Marchadier D, Maugeais C, Glick JM, & Rader DJ. Characterization of the lipolytic activity of endothelial lipase. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(6):921–929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Savonen R, Hiden M, Zechner R, Levak-Frank S, Olivecrona G, et al. The tissue distribution of lipoprotein lipase determines where chylomicrons bind. J Lipid Res. 2015;56(3):588–598. 10.1194/jlr.M056028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zechner R. The tissue-specific expression of lipoprotein lipase: implications for energy and lipoprotein metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1997;8(2):77–88. 10.1097/00041433-199704000-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kristensen KK, Midtgaard SR, Mysling S, Kovrov O, Hansen LB, Skar-Gislinge N, et al. A disordered acidic domain in GPIHBP1 harboring a sulfated tyrosine regulates lipoprotein lipase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(26):E6020–E6029. 10.1073/pnas.1806774115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Birrane G, Beigneux AP, Dwyer B, Strack-Logue B, Kristensen KK, Francone OL, et al. Structure of the lipoprotein lipase-GPIHBP1 complex that mediates plasma triglyceride hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116(5):1723–1732. 10.1073/pnas.1817984116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mulder M, Lombardi P, Jansen H, van Berkel TJ, Frants RR, & Havekes LM. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are involved in the lipoprotein lipase-mediated enhancement of the cellular binding of very low denisty and low density lipoproteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;185(2):582–587. 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91664-c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zilversmit DB. A proposal linking atherogenesis to the interaction of endothelial lipoprotein lipase with triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Circ Res. 1973;33(6):633–638. 10.1161/01.res.33.6.633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Corey JE & Zilversmit DB. Effect of cholesterol feeding on arterial lipolytic activity in the rabbit. Atherosclerosis. 1977;27(2):201–212. 10.1016/0021-9150(77)90057-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilson K, Fry GL, Chappell DA, Sigmund CD, & Medh JD. Macrophage-specific expression of human lipoprotein lipase accelerates atherosclerosis in transgenic apolipoprotein E knockout mice but not in C57BL/6 mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(11):1809–1815. 10.1161/hq1101.097805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He PP, OuYang XP, Li Y, Lv YC, Wang ZB, Yao F, et al. MicroRNA-590 inhibits lipoprotein lipase expression and prevents atherosclerosis in apoE knockout mice. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0138788 10.1371/journal.pone.0138788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhen Z, Ren S, Ji H, Ding X, Zou P, & Lu J. The lncRNA DAPK-IT1 regulates cholesterol metabolism and inflammatory response in macrophages and promotes atherogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;516(4):1234–1241. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Babaev VR, Fazio S, Gleaves LA, Carter KJ, Semenkovich CF, & Linton MF. Macrophage lipoprotein lipase promotes foam cell formation and atherosclerosis in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1999;103(12):1697–1705. 10.1172/JCI6117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Renier G, Skamene E, DeSanctis JB, & Razioch D. Induction of tumor necrosis factor a gene experssion by lipoprotein lipase. J Lipid Res. 1994;35(2):271–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weaver AM, Lysiak JJ, & Gonias SL. LDL receptor family-dependent and -independent pathways for the internalization and digestion of lipoprotein lipase-associated β-VLDL by rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Lipid Res. 1997;38(9):1841–1850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Essaji Y, Yang Y, Albert CJ, Ford DA, Brown RJ. Hydrolysis products generated by lipoprotein lipase and endothelial lipase influence macrophage cell signalling pathways. Lipids. 2013;48(8):769–778. 10.1007/s11745-013-3810-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manning BD & Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–1274. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andjelković M, Alessi DR, Meier R, Fernandez A, Lamb NJ, Frech M, et al. Role of translocation in the activation and function of protein kinase B. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(50):31515–31524. 10.1074/jbc.272.50.31515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Auguin D, Barthe P, Augé-Sénégas MT, Stern MH, Noguchi M, & Roumestand C. Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the pleckstrin homology domain of the human protein kinase B (PKB/Akt). Interaction with inositol phosphates. J Biomol NMR. 2004;28(2):137–155. 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000013836.62154.c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dong F, Mo Z, Eid W, Courtney KC, & Zha X. Akt inhibition promotes ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux to apoA-I through supressing mTORC1. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113789; 10.1371/journal.pone.0113789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang Y, Thyagarajan N, Coady BM, Brown RJ. Cholesterol efflux from THP-1 macrophages is impaired by the fatty acid component from lipoprotein hydrolysis by lipoprotein lipase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014;451(4):632–636. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murao K, Ohyama T, Imachi H, Ishida T, Cao WM, Namihira H, et al. TNF-α stimulation of MCP-1 expression is mediated by the Akt/PKB signal transduction pathway in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;276(2):791–796. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fernández-Hernando C, Ackah E, Yu J, Suárez Y, Murata T, Iwakiri Y, et al. Loss of Akt1 leads to severe atherosclerosis and occlusive coronary artery disease. Cell Metab. 2007;6(6):446–457. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Babaev VR, Hebron KE, Wiese CB, Toth CL, Ding L, Zhang Y, et al. Macrophage deficiency of Akt2 reduces atherosclerosis in Ldlr null mice. J Lipid Res. 2014;55(11):2296–2308. 10.1194/jlr.M050633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chang JD, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Schvartz E, Lichtenstein AH, Field SJ, et al. Deletion of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110γ gene attenuates murine atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(19):8077–8082. 10.1073/pnas.0702663104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ouimet M & Marcel YL. Regulation of lipid droplet cholesterol efflux from macrophage foam cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(3):575–581. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.240705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ouimet M, Ediriweera H, Afonso MS, Ramkhelawon B, Singaravelu R, Liao X, et al. microRNA-33 regulates macrophage autophagy in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(6):1058–1067. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jung CH, Ro SH, Cao J, Otto NM, & Kim DH. mTOR regulation of autophagy. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(7):1287–1295. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fournier N, Sayet G, Vedie B, Nowak M, Allaoui F, Solgadi A, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid membrane incorporation impairs cholesterol efflux from cholesterol-loaded human macrophages by reducing the cholesteryl ester mobilization from lipid droplets. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1862(10 Pt A):1079–1091. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang CX, Zhang YL, Wang JF, Jiang JY, & Bao JL. MCP-1 impacts RCT by repressing ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI through PI3K/Akt posttranslational regulation in HepG2 cells. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(5):1231–1240. 10.1194/jlr.M032482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jakobsen MU, O’Reilly EJ, Heitmann BL, Pereira MA, Bälter K, Fraser GE, et al. Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1425–1432. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y & Oram JF. Unsaturated fatty acids inhibit cholesterol efflux from macrophages by increasing degradation of ATP-binding cassette transporter 1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(7):5692–5697. 10.1074/jbc.M109977200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, & Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gillotte KL, Zaiou M, Lund-Katz S, Anantharamaiah GM, Holvoet P, Dhoest A, et al. Apolipoprotein-mediated plasma membrane microsolubilization: role of lipid affinity and membrane penetration in the efflux of cellular cholesterol and phospholipid. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(4):2021–2028. 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Clark J, Anderson KE, Juvin V, Smith TS, Karpe F, Wakelam MJ, et al. Quantification of PtdInsP3 molecular species in cells and tissues by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2011;8(3):267–272. 10.1038/nmeth.1564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.