Abstract
Calreticulin is a highly conserved, ubiquitous Ca2+-buffering protein in the endoplasmic reticulum that controls transcriptional activity of various developmental programs and also of embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation. Calreticulin activates calcineurin, which dephosphorylates and induces the nuclear import of the osteogenic transcription regulator nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATC1). We investigated whether calreticulin controls a switch between osteogenesis and chondrogenesis in mouse ESCs through NFATC1. We found that in the absence of calreticulin, intranuclear transport of NFATC1 is blocked and that differentiation switches from osteogenic to chondrogenic, a process that could be mimicked by chemical inhibition of NFAT translocation. Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) deactivation and nuclear localization of β-catenin critical to osteogenesis were abrogated by calreticulin deficiency or NFAT blockade. Chemically induced GSK3β inhibition bypassed the calreticulin/calcineurin axis and increased osteoblast output from both control and calreticulin-deficient ESCs, while suppressing chondrogenesis. Calreticulin-deficient ESCs or cells treated with an NFAT blocker had enhanced expression of dickkopf WNT-signaling pathway inhibitor 1 (Dkk1), a canonical Wnt pathway antagonist that blocks GSK3β deactivation. The addition of recombinant mDKK1 switched osteogenic ESC differentiation toward chondrogenic differentiation. The results of our study indicate a role for endoplasmic reticulum calcium signaling via calreticulin in the differentiation of ESCs to closely associated osteoblast or chondrocyte lineages.
Keywords: embryonic stem cell (ESC), glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3), Wnt signaling, chondrogenesis, NFAT transcription factor, calreticulin, osteogenesis, nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATC1), gene regulation, cell fate decision, development
Introduction
Calreticulin is a highly conserved, ubiquitous high-capacity Ca2+-buffering protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)3 that is centrally located in a signaling network within the ER lumen (1). Calreticulin is uniquely endowed for this role as it controls ER [Ca2+] and the amount of Ca2+ releasable from the ER (2). Calreticulin-mediated ER signaling is poised to regulate transcriptional activity of developmental programs in general, and ESC differentiation in particular (3, 4). An important part of the transcriptional circuitry is the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent phosphatase, calcineurin (5). Calreticulin regulates the release of Ca2+ from the ER required for activation of calcineurin (6), hence modulating the activity of several downstream genes that affect developmental processes (5). For example, ablation of calreticulin in mice is embryonic lethal due to faulty cardiomyogenesis (7), but it can be rescued in calreticulin-deficient (crt−/−) mice by specific heart-targeted overexpression of constitutively activated calcineurin (8). Overexpression of calcineurin in mice enhances osteoblast differentiation and bone formation (9), whereas calcineurin-null mice have diminished bone formation and severe osteoporosis, due to reduced osteoblast differentiation (9). Treatment of adult mice with the calcineurin inhibitor, FK506, reduces bone mass by primarily blocking osteoblastic bone formation (10). Calcineurin affects osteoblastogenesis by dephosphorylating transcription factors called the cytoplasmic nuclear factors of activated T cells (NFATC), thereby allowing their entry into the nucleus for gene regulation (5). NFATC1-deficient mice have defective bone formation, whereas mice with constitutively active nuclear NFATC1 in osteoblasts have increased osteoblast proliferation, high bone mass, and up-regulation of genes that promote osteogenic Wnt pathways (11).
Presently, there is substantial evidence for the role of calcineurin/NFAT in bone formation, but little for chondrocyte determination. Osteoblast and chondrocyte cell lineages are coupled during the nascent skeletal formation process known as endochondral ossification (12) and associated spatially in bone and cartilage of the mature skeleton, which requires a coordinated mechanism to specify the distinct lineages during development. ESCs can be differentiated to produce bone and chondrocyte cell lineages through the combination of defined media and the addition of bioactive signaling proteins and molecules (13). The present study focuses on the ER Ca2+-signaling role of calreticulin via the calcineurin/NFATC1 axis and GSK3β-deactivation in the differentiation to either osteoblasts or chondrocytes from murine ESCs. We found that calreticulin affects the fate in differentiating ESCs by determining NFATC1 loci of residence. Calreticulin suppresses the expression of the chondrogenic master transcription factor, Sox9, thereby suppressing the specification of chondrocytes, while simultaneously permitting osteoblast specification. Lineage determination is also accomplished by deactivation of GSK3β, which we show to be regulated by calreticulin and its downstream effector, NFAT. The absence of calreticulin and intranuclear NFAT favors chondrocyte specification despite the cells being cultured under an osteogenic differentiation protocol. Collectively, we describe a novel mechanism by which ER-Ca2+ signaling determines lineage specification to either an osteoblast or chondrocyte lineage in a mutually exclusive manner.
Results
Calreticulin regulates osteoblasts versus chondrocyte lineage specification
To characterize a role for calreticulin in osteoblastogenesis, we compared differentiation of calreticulin-deficient (crt−/−) ESCs to WT control ESCs. Mineralization was substantially reduced in crt−/− cultures compared with the WT cells (Figs. 1A and 2 (A and D)). The increase in osteoblast activity of crt+/+ WT cells during differentiation was reflected in significantly higher transcript levels of osteoblast-specific genes Runx2, Sp7 (osterix), and Ibsp in WT cells versus crt−/− ESCs (Fig. 1B). The osteogenic transcription factor, osterix, is overwhelmingly located in the nuclei of the WT cultures at day 19 (Fig. 1E). Transcripts for Wnt signaling genes important for osteogenesis, including Wnt10b and Wnt11 (14), were also elevated by the first week, but not in calreticulin-deficient ESCs (Fig. S1). Conversely, the anti-osteogenic canonical Wnt signaling antagonist, Dkk1 (15), is enhanced in differentiating crt−/− cultures (Fig. S1) and indicates a divergence from osteoblast differentiation. Overall, the data confirm a favored osteoblast specification from WT ESCs versus those from crt-null ESCs in both signaling environment and function.
Chondrocyte generation is strongly coupled to osteoblasts via their common cell lineage ancestors (16); therefore, we examined the cell fate of differentiated crt−/− ESCs cultured in conditions favoring osteoblasts. The absence of calreticulin permitted a switch of the ESC fate from osteogenic toward a chondrogenic fate, as demonstrated by enhanced Alcian blue staining of glycosaminoglycans secreted by chondrocytes (Fig. 1C). Increased expression of chondrocytic genes, such as type II collagen α1 and aggrecan, and, importantly, increased transcript and protein levels of the chondrocyte master transcription factor Sox9 (Fig. 1D and Fig. S2 (A and B)) in crt−/− cells versus WT cells confirmed this switch in fate. The permissive effect of calreticulin absence on the cell fate switch from osteoblast to chondrocyte is apparent in the disparate manners of cell packing: WT culture cell colonies are tightly packed, whereas in crt−/− colonies, the cells are more spread with less defined colony edges, and colonies are much less cell-dense (Fig. 1F). There was also a shift in the abundance of nuclear SOX9 over nuclear osterix between WT and crt−/− cells. Immunofluorescence images show that at day 19, crt−/− cells express significantly lower nuclear osterix levels and higher levels of the chondrogenic transcription factor SOX9 in the nucleus. There is also a higher level of staining of the cartilage marker type II collagen compared with WT cells (Fig. 1E), demonstrating a shift to chondrocyte specification in the absence of calreticulin.
A signaling axis comprising calreticulin/Ca2+/calcineurin promotes osteoblast specification over chondrocyte specification
Calreticulin, by being the most robust ER Ca2+ buffer, is critical for Ca2+ homeostasis; the absence of calreticulin reduces both ER-releasable and total [Ca2+], and the converse is true for calreticulin overexpression (17). Ca2+ content of mineralized deposits in WT cultures was ∼7-fold higher than that in the crt−/− cultures (Fig. 2A), and chelation of intracellular [Ca2+] with BAPTA/AM caused a substantial decrease in WT cell mineralization (Fig. 2 (A and D), von Kossa plates). Decreased osteoblast activity in the presence of BAPTA/AM was confirmed with a decrease of mRNA abundance of the osteoblast markers Runx2, osterix, and osteocalcin (Fig. 2B). In contrast, increasing intracellular [Ca2+] with ionomycin restored mineralization of the nonosteogenic crt−/− cell cultures (Fig. 2 (A and D), von Kossa plates). Again, mRNA levels of osteoblast markers in crt−/− cell cultures treated with ionomycin are increased compared with vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 2B). These results strongly indicate that the role of calreticulin in osteoblastogenesis is through its Ca2+ homeostasis function. Concurrently, as BAPTA/AM decreased osteoblast activity of WT cell cultures, there was a modest increase in acidic proteoglycan staining with Alcian blue (Fig. 2D) along with a modestly enhanced expression of Sox9 and aggrecan mRNA (Fig. 2C) and SOX9 protein (Fig. S2, C and D) promptly detected after the time frame of treatment with the intracellular Ca2+ chelator (days 3–5). The inverse is more notable when crt−/− cell cultures were treated with ionomycin and the early Sox9 expression decreased (Fig. 2C and Fig. S2 (C and D)). Aggrecan mRNA levels decreased at later time points (Fig. 2C), along with decreased Alcian blue staining (Fig. 2D).
Ca2+ released by calreticulin activates calcineurin (18, 19); hence, we examined the involvement of the calreticulin/Ca2+/calcineurin axis in osteoblastogenesis. Calcineurin activity was low in crt−/− cells when compared with WT ESCs (Fig. S3A). A stable transfection of nonosteogenic crt−/− cells with constitutively active calcineurin (cell line denoted crt−/−+CaN*) restored calcineurin activity (Fig. S3A) and induced dramatically high mRNA levels of osteoblast markers during the early period of differentiation (day 7; Fig. S3B) that translated to a restoration of osteogenic potential similar to that of crt+/+ WT cells (Fig. 2, A and E). Predictably, cyclosporin A inhibited calcineurin activity (Fig. S3A), which also suppressed mineralization in both differentiating control and crt−/−+CaN* ESCs (Fig. 2, A and E).
The calreticulin/Ca2+/calcineurin axis controls NFATC1 nucleocytoplasmic trafficking
NFATC1 has been shown to be an effector for calreticulin and calcineurin to induce osteoblast specification (11, 20). Importantly, intranuclear localization of NFATC1 is significantly (>80% of cells) restored upon expression of constitutively active calcineurin in crt−/−+CaN* cells (Fig. 3A); therefore, akin to other systems, calcineurin dephosphorylates NFATC1 to promote its nuclear translocation. Immunofluorescence observations have been complemented by manual counts of NFATC1 distribution and Manders' overlap coefficients to quantify colocalization with propidium iodide nuclear staining (Table S1, NFAT localization).
Western blot analysis of the nuclear fractions of WT ESCs throughout the timeline of differentiation demonstrates that NFATC1 is detected by day 6 and peaks by days 8–12 of differentiation, after which nuclear levels sharply decline (Fig. 3, B and C). Calreticulin protein expression increases and peaks by day 6 in WT cells (Fig. 3B), and hence its expression pattern overlaps with NFATC1 nuclear entry within the first week of osteoblast specification. In contrast, NFATC1 nuclear entry is delayed and significantly reduced in the nonosteoblastic but chondrogenic crt−/− cells (Fig. 3, B and C). Immunolocalization experiments throughout timeline of differentiation (Fig. 3E) corroborate NFATC1 cytosolic-nuclear trafficking cited in the above nuclear fractionation analysis. As a control, we measured expression of the direct target of NFATC1, Dscr1 (21), and found that its mRNA expression profile correlated with the timing of NFATC1 nuclear translocation and that the absence of calreticulin attenuated Dscr1 expression (Fig. 3D), indicating NFATC1 transcriptional activity.
Next, we inhibited intranuclear translocation of NFATC1 using a small molecule, A-285222, which inhibited intranuclear translocation of NFATC1 (Fig. S4A) and attenuated NFATC1 target gene, Dscr1, expression (Fig. 3D), while affecting neither NFAT phosphorylation status nor calcineurin activity (22). The absence of NFATC1 from the nucleus resulted in decreased mineralization in both differentiating WT control and crt−/−+CaN* ESCs (Fig. 2, A and E) and decreased mRNA levels of osteoblast genes Runx2, osterix, and osteocalcin (Fig. S4B), highlighting NFATs role in regulating osteoblast differentiation.
NFATC1 suppresses chondrocyte specification
The decrease of NFATC1 nuclear translocation in differentiating crt−/− ESCs (Fig. 3) led us to examine whether or not NFAT regulates chondrocyte specification in cell culture favoring osteoblasts. Given that NFATC1 localizes to the nucleus around day 6 and is still present at day 17 of differentiation but at decreasing levels, we treated differentiating WT ESCs with the inhibitor of intranuclear NFAT transport, A-285222, between days 6 and 17. Preventing intranuclear presence of NFAT resulted in increased staining for chondrocyte extracellular glycosaminoglycans (Fig. 4A) and increased expression and stabilization of chondrocyte-specific aggrecan and chondrocyte master transcription factor Sox9 (Fig. 4B) and SOX9 protein (Fig. 4, C and D). Immunofluorescence analysis at day 19 shows enhanced nuclear SOX9 and cartilage marker, type II collagen expression (Fig. 4E; compare with Fig. 1E for WT control), in the presence of A-285222. In contrast, nuclear osterix levels decreased (Fig. 4E). Additionally, in the presence of A-285222, expression levels of osteogenic Wnt-signaling genes Wnt10b and Wnt11 were attenuated (Fig. S1) as were the osteogenic genes cited above (Fig. S4B).
Calreticulin and NFAT enable GSK3β deactivation
Because we demonstrated that genes of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway are affected by calreticulin, and inhibition of GSK3β increases mice bone formation and bone mass (23, 24), we looked at the role GSK3β deactivation plays in osteoblast specification from ESCs. Using an antibody specific for the phosphorylated serine 9 of GSK3β, which marks kinase deactivation (25), Western blot analysis demonstrated that GSK3β is deactivated in a biphasic pattern overlapping with that seen in NFATC1 nucleocytoplasmic trafficking during the differentiation as demonstrated biochemically (compare Fig. 5 (A and B) with Fig. 3 (B and C)) and morphologically (Fig. 3E). Similar to the observation that nuclear import of NFATC1 depended on the presence of calreticulin, we show that the transient deactivation of GSK3β was also dependent on the presence of calreticulin as it was entirely absent from crt−/− ESCs (Fig. 5, A and B). Accordingly, Ser-9 phosphorylation of GSK3β is attenuated when differentiating cultures are treated with the NFAT transport blocker A-285222 for days 6–17 (Fig. 5, C and D).
A downstream consequence of GSK3β deactivation is the intranuclear accumulation of β-catenin where it induces gene transduction critical to osteoblast differentiation, while suppressing chondrocyte differentiation (16, 26). Nuclear β-catenin levels analyzed by Western blotting throughout differentiation increase in parallel to the levels of both nuclear NFATC1 and phosphorylated serine 9 GSK3β (compare Fig. 6 (A and B) with Figs. 3 (B and C) and 5 (A and B)). In contrast, nuclear β-catenin levels in crt−/− ESCs do not significantly increase (Fig. 6, A and B). Immunolocalization of β-catenin in WT control cultures on day 14 of differentiation shows a diverse distribution of the protein that includes localization to cytosol, proximity to the plasma membrane in a pattern similar to adherens junctions, and intranuclear residence (Fig. 6C). In crt−/− ESCs, β-catenin is predominately junctional and absent from nuclei (Fig. 6C). To assess whether β-catenin responds as anticipated in our differentiation model, we directly inhibited GSK3β with the small molecule CHIR99021 in differentiating WT ESCs. Indeed, the images demonstrate that CHIR99021 treatment restricted the entire pool of detectable cellular β-catenin to the nucleus (Fig. 6C). Alternatively, we treated WT cells with the canonical Wnt pathway antagonist, mouse recombinant DKK1 (rbDKK1), and that blocked intranuclear translocation of β-catenin, rendering it predominantly junctional (Fig. 6C). In the absence of calreticulin, or by blocking translocation of NFATC1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus with A-285222 in both cell lines, β-catenin primarily resides in a junctional pattern (Fig. 6C). These results strongly suggest that NFATC1 is a link between calreticulin and GSK3β deactivation and consequently β-catenin accumulates in the nucleus, which is critical to osteoblast specification.
Blocking canonical Wnt pathway signaling increases chondrogenesis and decreases osteogenesis
Because calreticulin- and NFAT-dependent deactivation of GSK3β is important for osteogenic differentiation, we hypothesized that blocking GSK3β deactivation would enhance chondrocyte differentiation during osteogenic differentiation. This is predicated by our observation that the expression of the canonical Wnt pathway inhibitor gene Dkk1 is enhanced in chondrogenic crt−/− ESCs or WT ESCs treated with the NFAT transport blocker A-285222 during differentiation (Fig. S1). Hence, to alleviate canonical Wnt pathway–induced GSK3β deactivation, we treated differentiating WT ESCs with recombinant mouse DKK1 on days 6–17. As expected, Western blot analysis of whole-cell lysates extracted throughout differentiation showed that rbDKK1 treatment of WT ESCs decreased levels of phosphorylated Ser-9 GSK3β (Fig. S5, A and B). This indicates that rbDKK1 blocked the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Treatment with rbDKK1 of crt−/− ESCs did not affect their already low levels of phosphorylation of Ser-9 GSK3β (Fig. S5, A and B). Recombinant DKK1 treatment enhanced Alcian blue staining (Fig. 7A), increased transcript expression of chondrocyte marker genes Sox9 and aggrecan (Fig. 7B), and increased levels of SOX9 protein expression, but did not significantly change expression levels of SOX9 in crt−/− cells (Fig. 7C). There was also a concomitant decrease of mineralization (Fig. 7A) and osteoblast gene expression of osterix and osteocalcin (Fig. 7B). Immunofluorescence analysis shows that rbDKK1 treatment increased SOX9 nuclear localization and type II collagen staining and decreased osterix nuclear localization (Fig. 7D). Recombinant DKK1 induced an increased junctional-like localization of β-catenin in WT cells first cited above (Fig. 6C). This observation corroborates with the Western blot analysis of WT nuclear fractions that shows that rbDKK1 treatment decreased nuclear β-catenin levels compared with nontreated cells and that in the nuclear fractions of differentiating crt−/− ESCs the lower levels of β-catenin do not significantly change regardless of rbDKK1 treatment (Fig. S5, C and D). These results confirm that osteogenic ESC differentiation depends on the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and that disruption of calreticulin, NFAT nuclear translocation, or canonical Wnt signaling induces chondrocyte specification in conditions that otherwise favor the differentiation of ESCs to osteoblasts.
We next considered whether the disruption of canonical Wnt signaling by rbDKK1 alters NFATC1 translocation to the nucleus and thereby negatively affects this pro-osteogenic event. Western blot analysis of WT and crt−/− ESC nuclear fractions showed that rbDKK1 did not significantly alter the levels of nuclear NFATC1 in the differentiating WT nuclear fractions nor the blockage of NFATC1 nuclear transport observed in nontreated crt−/− ESC nuclear fractions (Fig. S5, E and F). This observation supports the role for nuclear NFAT transport—dependent on calreticulin—to positively regulate a pro-osteoblast differentiation response by the canonical Wnt signaling pathway that concomitantly suppresses chondrocyte differentiation from a culture of ESCs.
Calreticulin via GSK3β deactivation enhances osteoblast specification as it suppresses chondrocyte specification
To examine the effect of GSK3β deactivation in differentiation, we enhanced and prolonged the GSK deactivation of the differentiating WT ESC population with the potent and specific inhibitor, CHIR99021 between days 6 and 17. There was a significant increase of mineralization as visualized by von Kossa staining (Fig. 8A) and enhanced expression of the osteoblast markers Runx2, osterix, and osteocalcin (Fig. 8B). In the presence of CHIR99021, the WT cells grow into tightly packed spherical nodules by day 10 (Fig. 8E). Immunofluorescence analysis of these packed nodules at day 19 shows substantial levels of nuclear osterix (Fig. 8H) and enhanced nuclear β-catenin (Fig. 6C, CHIR99021 row) and low levels of both nuclear SOX9 and extracellular type II collagen immunostaining (Fig. 8H).
We propose that direct inhibition of GSK3β would mitigate the requirement of calreticulin, calcineurin, and NFATC1, which are all absent or attenuated in differentiating crt−/− ESCs. Indeed, inhibition of GSK3β in differentiating crt−/− ESCs increased mineralization, comparable with control ESCs (Fig. 8C). Osteoblast gene expression profiles of crt−/− ESCs in the presence of CHIR99021 are elevated (Fig. 8D). Phase-contrast morphology of the compact nodules grown in the presence of CHIR99021 is also indistinguishable between the WT and crt−/− cell lines (Fig. 8E). In contrast, CHIR99021-induced inhibition of GSK3β decreased Alcian blue staining in both WT and crt−/− ESCs to similar levels (Fig. 8F). Transcript levels of aggrecan and Sox9 were suppressed in WT cells (Fig. 8G). Likewise, CHIR99021 treatment of crt−/− ESCs suppressed the inherently enhanced expression of Sox9 and aggrecan (Fig. 8G). CHIR99021 treatment of crt−/− ESCs also increased the abundance of nuclear osterix (Fig. 8H) and nuclear β-catenin (Fig. 6C, CHIR99021 row), while decreasing nuclear SOX9 and expression of the cartilage marker type II collagen (Fig. 8H; compare with crt−/− cells treated with vehicle control in Fig. 1E) similarly to WT ESCs treated with CHIR99021. We observe that CHIR99021 treatment of crt−/− ESCs did not enhance osteogenic gene expression as robustly as CHIR99021 treatment of WT ESCs (Fig. 8, B and D). Likewise, β-catenin is not as effectively sequestrated to the nuclei of CHIR99021-treated crt−/− ESCs (Fig. 6C, CHIR99021 row). This suggests that calreticulin has additional roles in the maintenance of osteoblast functionality, which might extend to other signaling pathways or to the stability and trafficking of β-catenin. Collectively, these data demonstrate that, in differentiating ESCs, calreticulin-dependent deactivation of GSK3β promotes osteoblast specification while at the same time suppressing chondrocyte specification.
Discussion
We propose that calreticulin conducts a Ca2+-mediated signal from the ER to promote osteoblast specification from ESCs. The Ca2+-buffering capacity of calreticulin is chiefly responsible for the induction of the osteoblast program, which is mediated by the cytosolic Ca2+-dependent phosphatase, calcineurin. Calcineurin dephosphorylates and induces the nuclear translocation of NFATC1 as part of the signaling pathway for bone formation (5, 10, 11). Concurrently, calreticulin also suppresses chondrocyte specification from differentiating ESCs. We demonstrate for the first time that blocking NFAT nuclear transport, either by calreticulin ablation or use of a specific NFAT inhibitor, enhanced and stabilized the expression of Sox9. Consequently, by controlling the locus of NFATC1 residence, calreticulin regulates a molecular switch in the fate of differentiating ESCs to osteoblasts or chondrocytes.
Another important signaling event necessary for bone formation is the deactivation of GSK3β (23, 24). Deactivation of GSK3β in WT cells during osteoblast differentiation overlaps with NFATC1 residence in the nucleus. In the absence of calreticulin, GSK3β deactivation is abolished. This strongly implies that calreticulin affects the osteogenic signaling mechanisms that deactivate GSK3β. We found that blocking NFAT nuclear translocation also blocked deactivation of GSK3β, possibly through NFAT-dependent stimulation of canonical Wnt pathway genes, such as Wnt10b (14), and suppression of the Wnt signaling antagonist Dkk1 (15). Indeed, we found that during differentiation, Wnt10b expression depended on calreticulin and NFAT signaling and that at similar differentiation periods, crt−/− cell cultures had enhanced Dkk1 expression, which was also enhanced in WT ESCs upon treatment with the NFAT blocker A-285222 (Fig. S1). DKK1 is closely associated with lytic bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma (27), and neutralizing secreted DKK1 protected bone from damage in arthritic joints (28). These cited studies indicate that DKK1 impedes bone integrity by disrupting osteoblast differentiation and are supported by our observations that treatment of WT ESCs with recombinant DKK1 also disrupted osteoblast differentiation. Instead, recombinant DKK1 stimulated the expression of chondrocyte characteristics supporting previous studies demonstrating that DKK1 was indispensable for the promotion of chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (29).
The situation whereby calreticulin stimulates canonical Wnt pathway signaling and suppresses its antagonism augments deactivation of GSK3β for osteoblastogenesis at the expense of chondrocyte formation. To further explore this, we inhibited GSK3β with CHIR99021, which rescued osteoblast output in otherwise chondrogenic crt−/− ESCs to levels like those in control WT ESCs treated for GSK3β inhibition. CHIR99021 treatment also robustly increased functional osteoblast output compared with the previously published differentiation protocol that relies on high serum levels and yields heterogeneity (30). The ability of CHIR99021 to alter the outcome of differentiation indicates that within a week of the start of differentiation, the cell population is amenable to either osteoblast or chondrocyte specification. Indeed, GSK3β inhibition starting on day 6 suppressed the expression of Sox9 in both cell lines. Sox9 is a potent and dominant inhibitor of Runx2 (31) and promotes chondrogenesis. Conversely, stabilized canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling reduces the expression of Sox9 (16) while promoting skeletogenesis. Kumar and Lassar (32) irreversibly silenced the Sox9 gene by canonical Wnt signaling–induced activation of the DNA methyltransferase, DNMT3A. This agrees with our data, which demonstrate that pharmacologic inhibition of GSK3β significantly suppresses Sox9 expression, ensuring that a higher level of Sox9 does not interfere with specification of osteoblasts.
Anatomically (33, 34) and functionally (1), the ER is a signaling organelle that plays an important role in development (3). Calreticulin, acting as a Ca2+-sensitive spigot for ER Ca2+ stores, affects outcomes of developmental decisions by controlling trafficking of transcriptionally crucial factors. Little is known about what directly controls calreticulin function during cell lineage specification, but its effect on the locus of NFATC1 residence and the status of GSK3β activation suggests a mechanism that asserts the essential mutual exclusivity of the osteoblast and chondrocyte lineages in skeletal development.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and ESC differentiation
G45 calreticulin knockout (crt−/−) mouse ESCs (7), WT ESCs (R1, derived from J1 129/Sv mice, purchased from the Embryonic Stem Cell Facility, Laboratory of Dr. Janet Rossant, Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada) (35), and crt−/− cells stably transfected with constitutively active calcineurin (crt−/−+CaN* (19)) were maintained on feeder cells of mitomycin C (Sigma)-treated mitotically inactive mouse embryonic fibroblasts on gelatin-coated plates. The ESCs were cultured in high-glucose ESC-optimized Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Multicell, Wisent), supplemented with 10% premium fetal bovine serum (virus- and mycoplasma-screened; Multicell, Wisent), 10 ng/ml recombinant leukemia-inhibitory factor, nonessential amino acids (Gibco), and 0.1 mm β-mercaptoethanol (BioShop). To initiate differentiation, we followed the protocol described by Yu et al. (36), but in brief, ESCs were trypsinized to single cells and suspended in base differentiation medium (high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented in 20% premium fetal bovine serum, nonessential amino acid solution, β-mercaptoethanol). On average, 250 cells were allocated per 25-μl drop and hung upside-down on a Petri dish lid for 3 days to generate spherical differentiated cell aggregates called embryoid bodies. They were collected in base differentiation medium supplemented with 0.1 μm retinoic acid (Sigma) and into Petri dishes that did not permit embryoid body (EB) surface attachment. After 2 days (day 5), the EBs were directly plated onto gelatin-coated tissue culture–treated plates, or to reduce cardiomyocyte formation, we trypsinized the EBs, filtered the suspension for single cells through a 100-μm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon), and plated on tissue culture–treated plates at a density of 30,000 cells/cm2 in differentiation medium supplemented with 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid (Sigma) and 10 mm β-glycerophosphate (Sigma) for specification and maintenance of the osteoblast lineage. On day 10, dexamethasone (Sigma) at 100 nm was added, and medium supplemented with ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone was changed every other day for 21 or 26 days.
Ca2+ manipulation and inhibitor studies
Differentiating cultures were treated with 0.1 μm cell membrane–permeable Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM (Sigma) for a 30-min incubation on each of days 3–5 of differentiation. Differentiating cultures were treated with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin (Sigma) at 1 μm for 2 h on each of days 3–5. For inhibition of calcineurin at days 3–5, cultures were treated with 1 μg/ml cyclosporin A (Sigma) for 2 h each day. Differentiating cells were treated with the inhibitor of intranuclear transport of NFAT A-285222 (Mr 416.28) (22) (a generous gift from AbbVie) at 5 μg/ml, a 3 μm concentration of the GSK inhibitor CHIR99021 (Tocris), or 100 ng/ml mouse recombinant DKK1 (R&D Systems), each continuously for days 6–17.
Calcineurin activity assay
Calcineurin activity was assessed as described previously by Fruman et al. (37). Briefly, a peptide corresponding to the regulatory domain of protein kinase A (RII-peptide, Sigma) was used as the substrate in an in vitro dephosphorylation assay. 1.0 × 106 ESCs were lysed in hypotonic buffer (50 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 0.1 mm EGTA, 1 mm EDTA, 250 mm DTT, and protease inhibitors). γ-32P-radiolabeled RII-peptide was added to a fraction of the lysate, and the dephosphorylation reaction was carried out for 20 min at 30 °C in the presence of 0.5 mm okadaic acid to eliminate contaminating serine/threonine phosphatases. Released radiolabeled phosphate was isolated away from the RII-peptide, and calcineurin phosphatase activity was expressed in pmol of phosphate released per mg of total protein.
Mineral deposition assays and Alcian blue staining
Differentiated cell cultures were stained for the presence of mineral deposits using von Kossa and alizarin red S (Sigma) as described in previous studies (38). Briefly, for von Kossa staining, cells were rinsed three times with PBS, fixed in 10% neutral formalin buffer for 2 h, and then washed three times with distilled water. The fixed cells were stained with 2.5% silver nitrate solution for 30 min in the presence of light produced from a 100-watt incandescent light bulb and then washed three times with distilled water. The amount of Ca2+ in the matrix was measured using the Arsenazo III (Sigma) staining method described previously (39). To visualize acidic proteoglycans secreted by chondrocytes, we stained 10% formalin-fixed cells with 1% Alcian blue 8GX (Sigma; 1 g of Alcian blue 8GX dissolved in 100 ml of 0.1 n HCl) for 30 min and then washed twice with 0.1 n HCl. All of the fixed and stained cells were air-dried, and the images were captured using an Epson Perfection V750 flat-bed light scanner.
Reverse transcriptase real-time PCR analysis
The Macherey–Nagel NucleoSpin RNA plus kit (D-Mark Biosciences) was used to extract total RNA from ESCs and differentiating cell progeny. 1 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using Bio-Rad iScript cDNA synthesis kit. Real-time PCR analysis was performed in Bio-Rad's CFX384 Touch detection system. The accumulation of PCR products was monitored by measuring the fluorescence produced by the binding of SYBR Green from the SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX kit (Bioline) to dsDNA. The cDNA levels were normalized with L32 (a housekeeping gene). Primer sequences are listed in Table S2.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis
Cell lysates were collected in buffer that contained 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 120 mm NaCl, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40. The Bradford method was used to quantify the concentrations of protein samples (40). Protein samples (10–30 μg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE (7.5% or 4–20% gradient gels; Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Rabbit anti-SOX9 (EMD Millipore) and mouse anti-b-catenin (BD Transduction Laboratories) were used at a 1:2000 dilution. The following primary antibodies were used at 1:1000 dilution (Cell Signaling Technology): anti-GSK3β, anti-phospho-GSK3β (Ser-9), anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), anti-NFAT2, anti-histone H3. The secondary antibody used was goat polyclonal secondary antibody to rabbit IgG-H&L (horseradish peroxidase) (Abcam). Immunoreactive bands were detected using the DNR MicroChem chemiluminescence camera system (DNR Bio-Imaging Systems). Bands were quantified with GelQuant software.
Immunofluorescence staining
Cells plated on gelatin-coated coverslips were rinsed three times with PBS and then fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 15 min. After washing (three times for 5 min each time) in PBS, the cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in buffer containing 100 mm PIPES, 1 mm EGTA, and 4% (w/v) PEG 8000 (pH 6.9) for 15 min. Fixed cells were then washed three times in PBS for 5 min and incubated with rabbit anti-NFAT2 (Cell Signaling Technology; dilution of 1:50), rabbit anti-SOX9 (EMD Millipore; 1:500), rabbit anti-Sp7/osterix and rabbit anti-collagen II (Abcam; 1:250), and mouse anti-β-catenin (BD Transduction Laboratories; 1:500) overnight at 4 °C. After washing in PBS (three times for 5 min), the cells were stained with the secondary antibody (FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (1:50) or Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit (1:1000)) for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were washed three times in PBS for 5 min and incubated with 100 μg/ml DNase-free RNase in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C, followed by rinsing in PBS three times for 1 min each. For nuclear staining, 500 nm propidium iodide (PI) solution was added to cover the cells for 5 min. After a final rinse in PBS, the slides were mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (Dako) or ProLong Gold Antifade with DAPI (Molecular Probes). To confirm the specificities of the secondary antibodies used, we performed immunofluorescence staining using calreticulin WT cells omitting primary antibodies. There was no nonspecific binding seen with anti-rabbit secondary antibodies. A confocal fluorescence microscope (MRC 600, Bio-Rad) equipped with a ×60/1.40 numerical aperture plan apochromatic oil immersion objective (Nikon) and krypton-argon laser was used for fluorescence imaging. COMOS software (Bio-Rad) was used for image acquisition. Additionally, we used an LSM 880 Elyra super-resolution confocal microscope with a ×20/0.8 numerical aperture M27 plan apochromatic objective and ZEN blue edition (Carl Zeiss) for image processing. Mander's coefficients were calculated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health).
Subcellular fractionation
Nuclear fractions were obtained by a modification of the method described previously (41). Briefly, cells were collected and washed with ice-cold 1× PBS, lysed on ice for 30 min in cold cytosolic extraction buffer (20 mm sucrose, 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mm MgCl2, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors). The cytosolic protein was collected by centrifugation at 800 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The pelleted nuclei was treated with nuclear extraction buffer (20 mm HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 0.5 mm EDTA, 20% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors). The nuclei were incubated with the nuclear extraction buffer on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 9000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove cellular debris from the nuclear extract. Protein concentration was measured for both the nuclear and cytosolic fractions using the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay followed by denaturing and boiling with 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
Statistical analysis
Statistical differences were calculated by one- or two-way analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test using GraphPad Prism 3.02.
Data availability
All data are contained within the article.
Author contributions
C. P. and M. O. conceptualization; C. P. and Z. A. data curation; C. P. and Z. A. formal analysis; C. P. and M. O. supervision; C. P. and M. O. investigation; C. P., Z. A., and M. O. visualization; C. P., Z. A., and M. O. methodology; C. P. and M. O. writing-original draft; C. P., Z. A., and M. O. writing-review and editing; Z. A. validation; M. O. funding acquisition; M. O. project administration.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Drs. Sylvia Papp and Eva Szabo for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Shairaz Baksh for assaying calcineurin activity, and Dr. Marek Michalak for the crt−/− cell lines (University of Alberta). We thank AbbVie for generosity and patience in providing the wonder drug A-285222. We also thank L. Al-Mansoori for imagery used in Fig. S4.
This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Grants MOP-106461 and MOP-130551 (to M. O.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
This article contains Tables S1 and S2 and Figs. S1–S5.
- ER
- endoplasmic reticulum
- ESC
- embryonic stem cell
- NFAT
- nuclear factor of activated T cells
- NFATC
- cytoplasmic NFAT
- rbDKK1
- recombinant DKK1
- EB
- embryoid body
- GAPDH
- glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- DAPI
- 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
- RT-qPCR
- real-time quantitative RT-PCR
- PI
- propidium iodide
- ANOVA
- analysis of variance.
References
- 1. Berridge M. J. (2002) The endoplasmic reticulum: a multifunctional signalling organelle. Cell Calcium 32, 235–249 10.1016/S0143416002001823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Michalak M., Parker J. M. R., and Opas M. (2002) Ca2+ signaling and calcium binding chaperones of the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Calcium 32, 269–278 10.1016/S0143416002001884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Webb S. E., and Miller A. L. (2003) Calcium signalling during embryonic development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 539–551 10.1038/nrm1149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tonelli F. M., Santos A. K., Gomes D. A., da Silva S. L., Gomes K. N., Ladeira L. O., and Resende R. R. (2012) Stem cells and calcium signalling. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 740, 891–916 10.1007/978-94-007-2888-2_40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Crabtree G. R., and Olson E. N. (2002) NFAT signalling: Choreographing the social lives of cells. Cell 109, S67–S79 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00699-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Groenendyk J., Lynch J., and Michalak M. (2004) Calreticulin, Ca2+, and calcineurin: signalling from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cells 17, 383–389 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mesaeli N., Nakamura K., Zvaritch E., Dickie P., Dziak E., Krause K. H., Opas M., MacLennan D. H., and Michalak M. (1999) Calreticulin is essential for cardiac development. J. Cell Biol. 144, 857–868 10.1083/jcb.144.5.857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Guo L., Nakamura K., Lynch J., Opas M., Olson E. N., Agellon L. B., and Michalak M. (2002) Cardiac-specific expression of calcineurin reverses embryonic lethality in calreticulin-deficient mouse. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 50776–50779 10.1074/jbc.M209900200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sun L., Blair H. C., Peng Y., Zaidi N., Adebanjo O. A., Wu X. B., Wu X. Y., Iqbal J., Epstein S., Abe E., Moonga B. S., and Zaidi M. (2005) Calcineurin regulates bone formation by the osteoblast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 17130–17135 10.1073/pnas.0508480102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Koga T., Matsui Y., Asagiri M., Kodama T., de Crombrugghe B., Nakashima K., and Takayanagi H. (2005) NFAT and Osterix cooperatively regulate bone formation. Nat. Med. 11, 880–885 10.1038/nm1270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Winslow M. M., Pan M., Starbuck M., Gallo E. M., Deng L., Karsenty G., and Crabtree G. R. (2006) Calcineurin/NFAT signaling in osteoblasts regulates bone mass. Dev. Cell 10, 771–782 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Long F. (2011) Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 27–38 10.1038/nrm3254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Craft A. M., Ahmed N., Rockel J. S., Baht G. S., Alman B. A., Kandel R. A., Grigoriadis A. E., and Keller G. M. (2013) Specification of chondrocytes and cartilage tissues from embryonic stem cells. Development 140, 2597–2610 10.1242/dev.087890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lerner U. H., and Ohlsson C. (2015) The WNT system: background and its role in bone. J. Intern. Med. 277, 630–649 10.1111/joim.12368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pinzone J. J., Hall B. M., Thudi N. K., Vonau M., Qiang Y. W., Rosol T. J., and Shaughnessy J. D. Jr. (2009) The role of Dickkopf-1 in bone development, homeostasis, and disease. Blood 113, 517–525 10.1182/blood-2008-03-145169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hill T. P., Später D., Taketo M. M., Birchmeier W., and Hartmann C. (2005) Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev. Cell 8, 727–738 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Michalak M., Groenendyk J., Szabo E., Gold L. I., and Opas M. (2009) Calreticulin, a multi-process calcium-buffering chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem. J. 417, 651–666 10.1042/BJ20081847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lynch J., and Michalak M. (2003) Calreticulin is an upstream regulator of calcineurin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 311, 1173–1179 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.08.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lynch J., Guo L., Gelebart P., Chilibeck K., Xu J., Molkentin J. D., Agellon L. B., and Michalak M. (2005) Calreticulin signals upstream of calcineurin and MEF2C in a critical Ca2+-dependent signaling cascade. J. Cell Biol. 170, 37–47 10.1083/jcb.200412156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sitara D., and Aliprantis A. O. (2010) Transcriptional regulation of bone and joint remodeling by NFAT. Immunol. Rev. 233, 286–300 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00849.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fuentes J. J., Genescà L., Kingsbury T. J., Cunningham K. W., Pérez-Riba M., Estivill X., and de la Luna S. (2000) DSCR1, overexpressed in Down syndrome, is an inhibitor of calcineurin-mediated signaling pathways. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1681–1690 10.1093/hmg/9.11.1681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Djuric S. W., BaMaung N. Y., Basha A., Liu H., Luly J. R., Madar D. J., Sciotti R. J., Tu N. P., Wagenaar F. L., Wiedeman P. E., Zhou X., Ballaron S., Bauch J., Chen Y. W., Chiou X. G., et al. (2000) 3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrazoles: a novel class of NFAT transcription factor regulator. J. Med. Chem. 43, 2975–2981 10.1021/jm990615a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Clément-Lacroix P., Ai M., Morvan F., Roman-Roman S., Vayssière B., Belleville C., Estrera K., Warman M. L., Baron R., and Rawadi G. (2005) Lrp5-independent activation of Wnt signaling by lithium chloride increases bone formation and bone mass in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 17406–17411 10.1073/pnas.0505259102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kugimiya F., Kawaguchi H., Ohba S., Kawamura N., Hirata M., Chikuda H., Azuma Y., Woodgett J. R., Nakamura K., and Chung U. I. (2007) GSK-3β controls osteogenesis through regulating Runx2 activity. PLoS ONE 2, e837 10.1371/journal.pone.0000837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Stambolic V., and Woodgett J. R. (1994) Mitogen inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β in intact cells via serine 9 phosphorylation. Biochem. J. 303, 701–704 10.1042/bj3030701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Day T. F., Guo X., Garrett-Beal L., and Yang Y. (2005) Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev. Cell 8, 739–750 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tian E., Zhan F., Walker R., Rasmussen E., Ma Y., Barlogie B., and Shaughnessy J. D. Jr. (2003) The role of the Wnt-signaling antagonist DKK1 in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 2483–2494 10.1056/NEJMoa030847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Diarra D., Stolina M., Polzer K., Zwerina J., Ominsky M. S., Dwyer D., Korb A., Smolen J., Hoffmann M., Scheinecker C., van der Heide D., Landewe R., Lacey D., Richards W. G., and Schett G. (2007) Dickkopf-1 is a master regulator of joint remodeling. Nat. Med. 13, 156–163 10.1038/nm1538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhong L., Huang X., Rodrigues E. D., Leijten J. C., Verrips T., El Khattabi M., Karperien M., and Post J. N. (2016) Endogenous DKK1 and FRZB regulate chondrogenesis and hypertrophy in three-dimensional cultures of human chondrocytes and human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 25, 1808–1817 10.1089/scd.2016.0222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yu Y., Al-Mansoori L., and Opas M. (2015) Optimized osteogenic differentiation protocol from R1 mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro. Differentiation 89, 1–10 10.1016/j.diff.2014.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zhou G., Zheng Q., Engin F., Munivez E., Chen Y., Sebald E., Krakow D., and Lee B. (2006) Dominance of SOX9 function over RUNX2 during skeletogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 19004–19009 10.1073/pnas.0605170103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kumar D., and Lassar A. B. (2014) Fibroblast growth factor maintains chondrogenic potential of limb bud mesenchymal cells by modulating DNMT3A recruitment. Cell Rep. 8, 1419–1431 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Papp S., Dziak E., Michalak M., and Opas M. (2003) Is all of the endoplasmic reticulum created equal? The effects of the heterogeneous distribution of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-handling proteins. J. Cell Biol. 160, 475–479 10.1083/jcb.200207136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Schwarz D. S., and Blower M. D. (2016) The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 73, 79–94 10.1007/s00018-015-2052-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nagy A., Rossant J., Nagy R., Abramow-Newerly W., and Roder J. C. (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 8424–8428 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Yu Y., Pilquil C., and Opas M. (2016) Osteogenic differentiation from embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1341, 425–435 10.1007/7651_2014_126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fruman D. A., Mather P. E., Burakoff S. J., and Bierer B. E. (1992) Correlation of calcineurin phosphatase activity and programmed cell death in murine T cell hybridomas. Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 2513–2517 10.1002/eji.1830221008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bellows C. G., Aubin J. E., Heersche J. N., and Antosz M. E. (1986) Mineralized bone nodules formed in vitro from enzymatically released rat calvaria cell populations. Calcif. Tissue Int. 38, 143–154 10.1007/BF02556874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Michaylova V., and Ilkova P. (1971) Photometric determination of micro amounts of calcium with arsenazo III. Anal. Chim. Acta 53, 194–198 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)80088-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bradford M. M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dimauro I., Pearson T., Caporossi D., and Jackson M. J. (2012) A simple protocol for the subcellular fractionation of skeletal muscle cells and tissue. BMC Res. Notes 5, 513 10.1186/1756-0500-5-513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the article.