Skip to main content
NASA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NASA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Minor Planet Bull. 2019 Jan-Mar;46(1):66–71.

ASTEROIDS OBSERVED FROM CS3: 2018 JULY - SEPTEMBER

Robert D Stephens 1
PMCID: PMC7243868  NIHMSID: NIHMS1570175  PMID: 32455413

Abstract

CCD photometric observations of 10 main-belt asteroids were obtained from the Center for Solar System Studies from 2018 July to September.


The Center for Solar System Studies “Trojan Station” (CS3, MPC U81) has two telescopes which are normally used in program asteroid family studies such as NEAs, Jovian Trojans and Hildas. During the 3rd quarter of 2018 the targets which are normally studied were either out of season, or the Moon was too close. In these cases, targets of opportunity amongst the main-belt families were selected.

All images were made with a 0.4-m or a 0.35-m SCT using an FLI ML-Proline 1001E or FLI ML-Microline 1001E CCD camera. Images were unbinned with no filter and had master flats and darks applied. Image processing, measurement, and period analysis were done using MPO Canopus (Bdw Publishing), which incorporates the Fourier analysis algorithm (FALC) developed by Harris (Harris et al., 1989). Night-to-night calibration (generally < ±0.05 mag) was done using field stars from the CMC-15 or APASS (Henden et al., 2009) catalogs. The Comp Star Selector feature in MPO Canopus was used to limit the comparison stars to near solar color.

In the lightcurve plots, the “Reduced Magnitude” is Johnson V corrected to a unity distance by applying −5*log (rΔ) to the measured sky magnitudes with r and Δ being, respectively, the Sun-asteroid and the Earth-asteroid distances in AU. The magnitudes were normalized to the phase angle given in parentheses using G = 0.15. The X-axis rotational phase ranges from −0.05 to 1.05.

The amplitude indicated in the plots (e.g. Amp. 0.20) is the amplitude of the Fourier model curve and not necessarily the adopted amplitude of the lightcurve.

For brevity, only some of the previously reported rotational periods may be referenced. A complete list is available at the lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009).

1026 Ingrid.

Szekely et al. (2005) found a 5.3 h period for this Flora family member from a single lightcurve covering less than the entire period. This year’s period spectrum shows aliases at 5.4 and 10.8 h and a low amplitude. When combined with the large amplitude Szekely result, the 5.437 h as the rotational period is adopted for this paper.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0001.jpg

1523 Pieksamaki.

This member of the Flora family has been studied several times in the past (Lagerkvist, 1979; Kryszczynska et al., 2012; Behrend, 2018) each time finding a rotational period near 5.32 h. The result found this year is consistent with those findings.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0002.jpg

1991 Darwin.

Wisniewski et al. (1979) found a rotational period near 4.7 h with a low amplitude of 0.08 mag for this Flora family member. Due to the extremely low amplitude, a number of aliases were present in the period spectrum. These include periods near 5 h, 6 h and 8 h. The 5.92 period creates a lightcurve that is a better fit to the data, although the 4.73 h period cannot be formally ruled out.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0003.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0004.jpg

2017 Wesson.

Behrend (2018) and Kryszczynska et al. (2012) reported periods near 3.415 h for this Flora family member. This year’s finding is in good agreement with those results.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0005.jpg

3562 Ignatius.

Previous results found in the lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009) are from Falese et al. (2014) and Stephens (2016) each reporting a periods near 2.73 h. The initial observations (“No Sub” plot) showed what appeared to be a second frequency indicating a binary asteroid. The dual period analysis found a primary lightcurve of P1 = 2.832 ± 0.001 h, A1 = 0.09 ± 0.01 mag (“P1” plot). As suspected, subtracting this lightcurve from the data set and doing a period search found a solution that showed what appears to be an orbital period due to a satellite (“P2” plot). A number of aliases can be seen in the period spectrum. The most likely period of P2 = 16.00 ± 0.02 h, A2 = 0.18 mag shows a classic bimodal lightcurve. Since the asteroid was well past opposition when observations commenced, and because P2 is so close to three quarters of an Earth day, the secondary lightcurve could not be completed and it remains a suspected binary. A good opportunity for follow up is in 2020 March.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0006.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0007.jpg

3890 Bunin.

No entry was found in the lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009) for this Vestoid.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0008.jpg

3893 DeLaeter.

This Phocaea family member has been studied twice in past with differing results. A previous rotational period of 13.84 h was found in 2003 (Stephens 2004). Warner (2014) found a period of 5.633 h. The Warner result had an asymmetric lightcurve with an amplitude of only 0.13 mag. The analysis of this year’s data does not support either of those periods. The period spectrum for 2018 shows several aliases at 6 h, 10 h and 16 h.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0009.jpg

The period spectrums of the 2003 and 2018 data formally ruled out the possibility of a 5.6 h period. Because the asteroid was well past opposition when observing started, a complete lightcurve could not be obtained. However, the period spectrums for all three oppositions allow for the possibility of a 9.6 h period. Plotting the 2018 data to that period shows a classic bimodal lightcurve with an amplitude of 0.19 mag. The 2003 data results in a single modal lightcurve with a 9.73 h period. Finally, the 2014 data results in a 9.61 h period with a trimodal lightcurve. With such low amplitudes, it is possible that a lightcurve could have a single minimum/maximum pair, or three or more pairs (Harris et al., 2014). Presently, the 9.61 h period is the only one that seems to fit all three datasets and is adopted for this paper.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0010.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0011.jpg

3894 Williamcooke.

Macias (2015) reported this member of the Eunomia family as having a low amplitude asymmetrical curve with three nights of coverage. Behrend (2018) reported a period of 8.33 h with eight extrema with an amplitude of 0.15 mag. At the time the asteroid was in a dense star field. These observations started two weeks after the Behrend result and were carefully controlled to remove background stars from the measurements. The period spectrum showed possible periods near 2, 4, 7, and 8.5 h. Because of the bimodal shape of the lightcurve and 0.20 mag amplitude, the 4.16 h period is adopted for this paper.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0012.jpg

31098 Frankhill.

No entry was found in the lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009) for this Mars-crosser.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0013.jpg

(44588) 1999 JF124.

No entry was found in the lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009) for this Hungaria.

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0014.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-1570175-f0015.jpg

Table I.

Observing circumstances and results. Pts is the number of data points. The phase angle values are for the first and last date. LPAB and BPAB are the approximate phase angle bisector longitude and latitude at mid-date range (see Harris et al., 1984). Grp is the asteroid family/group (Warner et al., 2009).

Number Name mm\dd Pts Phase LPAB BPAB Period P.E. Amp A.E. Grp
1026 Ingrid 08/26-09/09 185 27.4,23.1 23 −7 5.437 0.001 0.12 0.01 FLOR
1523 Pieksamaki 08/26-08/28 90 24.2,24.0 35 5 5.326 0.003 0.45 0.02 FLOR
1991 Darwin 08/21-08/25 197 20.1,18.1 357 3 5.92 0.01 0.09 0.02 FLOR
2017 Wesson 08/22-08/25 181 23.2,22.0 6 0 3.4153 0.0002 0.59 0.01 FLOR
3562 Ignatius 09/13-09/19 271 8.5,6.2 7 −7 2.832 0.001 0.09 0.01 FLOR
3562 Ignatius 16.00 0.02 0.18 0.02 FLOR
3890 Bunin 09/25-09/30 224 19.7,21.4 331 7 13.39 0.03 0.1 0.01 V
3893 DeLaeter 07/25-08/07 162 31.1,32.8 256 29 9.61 0.01 0.19 0.04 PHO
3894 Williamcooke 07/28-08/01 131 11.1,12.4 289 14 4.16 0.01 0.2 0.03 EUN
31098 Frankhill 07/04-07/24 242 14.9,22.1 282 22 50.04 0.03 0.44 0.10 MC
44588 1999 JF124 07/02-07/03 36 11.4,11.0 287 13 4.88 0.002 0.18 0.03 H

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible in part based on data from CMC15 Data Access Service at CAB (INTA-CSIC) (http://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/vocats/cmc15/). The purchase of a FLI-1001E CCD cameras was made possible by a 2013 Gene Shoemaker NEO Grants from the Planetary Society.

References

  1. Behrend R (2018). Observatoire de Geneve web site, http://obswww.unige.ch/~behrend/page_cou.html [Google Scholar]
  2. Falese J, Odden C, Prakash P (2014). “Lightcurve Analysis for 3562 Ignatius.” Minor Planet Bull. 41, 3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Harris AW, Young JW, Bowell E, Martin LJ, Millis RL, Poutanen M, Scaltriti F, Zappala V, Schober HJ, Debehogne H, Zeigler KW (1989). “Photoelectric Observations of Asteroids 3, 24, 60, 261, and 863.” Icarus 77, 171–186. [Google Scholar]
  4. Harris AW, Young JW, Scaltriti F, Zappala V (1984). “Lightcurves and phase relations of the asteroids 82 Alkmene and 444 Gyptis.” Icarus 57, 251–258. [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris AW, Pravec P, Galád B Skiff B, Warner B, Világi J, Gajdoš S, Carbognani A, Hornoch K, Kušnirák P, Cooney W, Gross J, Terrell D, Higgins D, Bowell E, Koehn B (2014). “On the maximum amplitude of harmonics of an asteroid lightcurve.” Icarus 235, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  6. Henden AA, Terrell D, Levine SE, Templeton M, Smith TC, Welch DI (2009). http//www.aavso.org/apass [Google Scholar]
  7. Kryszczyńska A, Colas F, Polińska M, Hirsch R, Ivanova V, Apostolovska G, Bilkina B, Velichko FP, Kwiatkowski T, Kankiewicz P, Vachier F, Umlenski V, Michałowski T, Marciniak A, Maury A, Kamiński K, Fagas M, Dimitrov W, Borczyk W, Sobkowiak K, Lecacheux J, Behrend R, Klotz A, Bernasconi L, Crippa R, Manzini F, Poncy R, Antonini P, Oszkiewicz D, Santana-Ros T (2012). “Do Slivan states exist in the Flora family?. I. Photometric survey of the Flora region.” Astron. Astrophys 546, A72. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lagerkvist CI (1979). “A lightcurve survey of asteroids with Schmidt telescopes - Observations of nine asteroids during oppositions in 1977.” Icarus 38, 106–114. [Google Scholar]
  9. Macias AA (2015). “Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at Isaac Aznar Observatory Aras De Los Olmos, Valencia, Spain.” Minor Planet Bull. 42, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephens RD (2004). “Photometry of 683 Lanzia, 1101 Clematis, 1499 Pori, 1507 Vaasa, and 3893 DeLaeter.” Minor Planet Bull. 31, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stephens RD (2016). “Asteroids Observed from CS3: 2016 January-March.” Minor Planet Bull. 43, 252–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Székely P, Kiss LL, Szabó Gy. M., Sárneczky K, Csák B, Váradi M, Mészáros Sz. (2005). “CCD photometry of 23 minor planets.” Icarus 53, 925–936. [Google Scholar]
  13. Warner BD (2014). “Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at CS3-Palmer Divide Station: 2014 March-June.” Minor Planet Bull. 41, 235–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warner BD, Harris AW, Pravec P (2009). “The Asteroid Lightcurve Database.” Icarus 202, 134–146. Updated 2018 July http://www.minorplanet.info/lightcurvedatabase.html [Google Scholar]
  15. Wisniewski WZ, Michalowski TM, Harris AW, McMillan RS (1979). “Photometric Observations of 125 Asteroids.” Icarus 126, 395–449. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES