Skip to main content
NASA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NASA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Minor Planet Bull. 2016 Apr-Jun;43(2):137–140.

ASTEROID LIGHTCURVE ANALYSIS AT CS3-PALMER DIVIDE STATION: 2015 OCTOBER-DECEMBER

Brian D Warner 1
PMCID: PMC7243998  NIHMSID: NIHMS1570089  PMID: 32455371

Abstract

Lightcurves for 14 main-belt asteroids were obtained at the Center for Solar System Studies-Palmer Divide Station (CS3-PDS) from 2015 October-December.


CCD photometric observations of 14 main-belt asteroids were made at the Center for Solar System Studies-Palmer Divide Station (CS3-PDS) from 2015 October-December. Table I lists the telescope/CCD camera combinations used for the observations. All the cameras use CCD chips from the KAF blue-enhanced family and so have essentially the same response. The pixel scales for the combinations range from 1.24-1.60 arcsec/pixel.

Table I.

List of CS3-PDS telescope/CCD camera combinations.

Desig Telescope Camera
Squirt 0.30–m f/6.3 Schmidt–Cass ML–1001E
Borealis 0.35–m f/9.1 Schmidt–Cass STL–1001E
Eclipticalis 0.35–m f/9.1 Schmidt–Cass ML–1001E
Australius 0.35–m f/9.1 Schmidt–Cass STL–1001E
Zephyr 0.50–m f/8.1 R–C FLI–1001E

All lightcurve observations were unfiltered since even a clear filter can result in a 0.1-0.3 magnitude loss. The exposure duration varied depending on the asteroid’s brightness and sky motion. Guiding on a field star sometimes resulted in a trailed image for the asteroid.

Measurements were made using MPO Canopus. If necessary, an elliptical aperture with the long axis parallel to the asteroid’s path was used. The Comp Star Selector utility in MPO Canopus found up to five comparison stars of near solar-color for differential photometry. Catalog magnitudes were usually taken from the MPOSC3 catalog, which is based on the 2MASS catalog (http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass) but with magnitudes converted from J-K to BVRI using formulae developed by Warner (2007). The nightly zero points have been found to be consistent to about ± 0.05 mag or better, but on occasion are as large as 0.1 mag. This consistency is critical to analysis of long period and/or tumbling asteroids. Period analysis is also done using MPO Canopus, which implements the FALC algorithm developed by Harris (Harris et al., 1989).

In the plots below, the “Reduced Magnitude” is Johnson V as indicated in the Y-axis title. These are values that have been converted from sky magnitudes to unity distance by applying −5*log (rΔ) to the measured sky magnitudes with r and Δ being, respectively, the Sun-asteroid and Earth-asteroid distances in AU. The magnitudes were normalized to the given phase angle, e.g., alpha(6.5°), using G = 0.15, unless otherwise stated. The X-axis is the rotational phase ranging from −0.05 to 1.05.

If the plot includes an amplitude, e.g., “Amp: 0.65”, this is the amplitude of the Fourier model curve and not necessarily the adopted amplitude for the lightcurve. The value is meant only to be a quick guide.

For the sake of brevity, only some of the previously reported results may be referenced in the discussions on specific asteroids. For a more complete listing, the reader is directed to the asteroid lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009a). The on-line version at http://www.minorplanet.info/lightcurvedatabase.html allows direct queries that can be filtered a number of ways and the results saved to a text file. A set of text files of the main LCDB tables, including the references with bibcodes, is also available for download. Readers are strongly encouraged to obtain, when possible, the original references listed in the LCDB for their work.

16 Psyche.

This well-studied outer main-belt asteroid was observed to tie lightcurve features to those found, if any, with radar and thermal observations made about the same. The period agrees closely with previous results (see references in the LCDB).

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0001.jpg

4674 Pauling.

This is a known binary (Merline et al., 2004) that was discovered using adaptive optics. The satellite has an orbital period of about 1200 hours and is too faint to be observed by lightcurve photometry alone. The results agree with previous results by the author (Warner, 2006; 2011) and others.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0002.jpg

5087 Emel’yanov.

The estimated diameter for this outer main-belt asteroid is 13.3 km, assuming an albedo of pv = 0.057 and H = 13.1. It was in the same field as a planned NEA asteroid for two nights, but only the first night provided sufficient coverage of a bimodal lightcurve. A search of the half-periods of the likely full period solutions led to adopting a final result of P = 14.5 ± 1.0 h and amplitude A = 0.30 ± 0.03 mag. There were no previous entries in the LCDB for the asteroid.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0003.jpg

9165 Raup.

A Hungaria asteroid of about 5 km effective diameter, Raup was observed for the second time by the author, the first time being in 2014 (Warner, 2014). At that time, the period was reported to be 560 h with the possibility of tumbling. The more extended data set in 2015 nearly doubled the period, P = 1320 ± 10 h, and found a slightly larger amplitude of A = 1.34 ± 0.03 mag. If the asteroid is tumbling, it would appear to be a very low level since there were no outward signs in the 2015 lightcurve.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0004.jpg

17447 Heindl.

This is the first time that the author observed this Hungaria as part of the on-going project to study this intriguing group of asteroids (see Warner et al., 2009b). There were no previous entries in the LCDB for Heindl.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0005.jpg

20936 Nemrut Dagi.

The author first worked this Hungaria as (20936) 4835 T-1 (Warner, 2008). The period was reported to be P = 5.697 h. Observations in 2011 (Warner, 2011b) changed that to P = 3.321 h but with an alternate solution of P = 6.643 h. Skiff (2011) found a similar pair of ambiguous solutions. The results from the 2015 data seem to establish the shorter period with P = 3.2754 h since a fit to the longer period is not reasonable. The 2007 data were re-examined and found to fit P = 3.233 ± 0.002 h, A = 0.05 mag.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0006.jpg

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0007.jpg

(36496) 2000 QK49.

This appears to be the first reported period for 2000 QK49, an inner main-belt asteroid of about 2.8 km effective diameter, assuming pv = 0.2, H = 15.1. It was in the same field as a planned target on two successive nights. Fortunately, each observing run covered more than a full cycle of the adopted period, which resulted in a secure solution. There were no previous entries in the LCDB.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0008.jpg

(49669) 1999 RZ30.

This asteroid was observed as part of the Hungaria observing project (now more than 10 years old). This appears to be the first reported period.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0009.jpg

(53115) 1999 AM14.

This middle main-belt asteroid was another target of opportunity, meaning that it was in the same field as a planned target. Only one night’s data were obtained, but the proposed period of P = 4.0 ± 0.1 h seems a reasonable estimate. There were no previous entries in the LCDB.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0010.jpg

(135885) 2002 TX49.

Another target of opportunity (in the same field as 9165 Raup), 2002 TX49 is a middle main-belt asteroid of about 2.6 km effective diameter, assuming pv = 0.1, H = 16.0. Despite data from only one night, the amplitude and phase angle make the period of P ~ 5.29 h more likely correct than not.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0011.jpg

(139515) 2001 PD53.

The Hungaria 9165 Raup was a target of opportunity magnet in October. This was one of no less than four such targets in the same field on one or more nights. 2001 PD53 is an outer main-belt asteroid of about 4 km diameter. Given the apparent coverage of more than half a cycle and amplitude, the period of P = 8.3 ± 0.5 h seems to be reliable, though not fully secure. There were no previous entries in the LCDB.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0012.jpg

(241339) 2007 VL269.

Another one of 9165 Raup’s entourage in October was this 1.2 km inner main-belt asteroid. There were no previous entries in the LCDB.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0013.jpg

(241804) 2001 QW282.

This is a 3 km outer main-belt asteroid with no previous entries in the LCDB.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0014.jpg

The period shown in the lightcurve (7.0 ± 0.82 h) is just one of many that fit the data. Assuming a bimodal lightcurve, the best solution is an indefinite one of P ≥ 12 h and A ≥ 0.2 mag.

(249590) 1996 UG2.

This was another target of opportunity. There were no previous entries in the LCDB for the 3.5 km outer main-belt asteroid. With data from two nights, the period is considered mostly, but not completely, secure.

graphic file with name nihms-1570089-f0015.jpg

Table II.

Observing circumstances.

Number Name 2015 mm/dd Pts Phase LPAB BPAB Period P.E. Amp A.E. Group
16 Psyche 11/30–12/26   540 4.5, 4.1, 7.5   77 −4    4.1963   0.0005   0.13 0.01 MB–O
4674 Pauling 11/26–12/01   126 31.5, 31.7 356 15    2.532   0.002   0.13 0.02 H
5087 Emel’yanov 11/01–11/02   128 11.8, 12.1   67 −5  14.5   1   0.3 0.03 MB–O
9165 Raup 08/30–10/19 2907 23.2, 3.3, 11.8  8 −7 1320 10   1.34 0.03 H
17447 Heindl 10/21–10/23   181 3.6, 3.2   29 −5    2.569   0.005   0.18 0.01 H

20936 4835 T–1 0711/06–11/15   161 27.4, 30.2  6 −3    3.233   0.002   0.05 0.01 H
20936 Nemrut Dagi 11/26–12/13   467 27.2, 22.6 107 24    3.2754   0.0005   0.08 0.01 H

36496 2000 QK49 10/09–10/10   146 13.1, 12.5   35   2    5.31   0.01   0.35 0.02 MB–I
49669 1999 RZ30 10/22–10/26   132 15.7, 17.2   10 18    3.119   0.005   0.26 0.03 H
53115 1999 AM14 12/16–12/16   62 4.0   76   2    4.04   0.1   0.16 0.02 MB–M
135885 2002 TX49 10/09–10/09   49 3.9   8 −3    5.3   0.5   0.33 MB–M
139515 2001 PD53 10/09–10/09   77 3.3   8 −3    8.3   0.5   0.63 0.05 MB–O
241339 2007 VL269 10/09–10/09   74 4.6   9 −3    7.7   0.5   0.85 0.05 MB–I
241804 2001 QW282 10/09–10/09   71 15.6 265 −9 >12. >0.2 MB–O
249590 1996 UG2 10/09–10/10   87 11.1, 10.6   36   2   4.45   0.05   0.23 0.03 MB–O
07

Observations in 2007.

The phase angle (α) is given at the start and end of each date range, unless it reached a minimum, which is then the second of three values. If a single value is given, the phase angle did not change significantly and the average value is given. LPAB and BPAB are each the average phase angle bisector longitude and latitude, unless two values are given (first/last date in range). The Group column gives the orbital group to which the asteroid belongs. The definitions and values are those used in the LCDB (Warner et al., 2009a). H = Hungaria; MB-I/M/O = Main-belt inner/middle/outer.

Acknowledgements

Funding for PDS observations, analysis, and publication was provided by NASA grant NNX13AP56G. Work on the asteroid lightcurve database (LCDB) was also funded in part by National Science Foundation grants AST-1210099 and AST-1507535.

This research was made possible in part based on data from CMC15 Data Access Service at CAB (INTA-CSIC) and the AAVSO Photometric All-Sky Survey (APASS), funded by the Robert Martin Ayers Sciences Fund. (http://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/vocats/cmc15/).

This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. (http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/)

References

  1. Harris AW, Young JW, Bowell E, Martin LJ, Millis RL, Poutanen M, Scaltriti F, Zappala V, Schober HJ, Debehogne H, Zeigler KW (1989). “Photoelectric Observations of Asteroids 3, 24, 60, 261, and 863.” Icarus 77, 171–186. [Google Scholar]
  2. Merline WJ, Tamblyn PM, Dumas C, Menard F, Close LM, Chapman CR, Duvert G, Ageroges N (2004). “S/2004 (4674) 1. IAUC 8297. [Google Scholar]
  3. Skiff BA (2011) Posting on CALL web site. http://www.minorplanet.info/call.html
  4. Warner BD, Pravec P, Kusnirak P, Foote C, Foote J, Galad A, Gajdos S, Kornos L, Vilagi J, Higgins D, Nudds S, Kugly YN, Gaftonyuk NM (2006). “Lightcurves analysis for Hungaria asteroids 3854 George, 4440 Tchantches and 4674 Pauling.” Minor Planet Bull. 33, 34–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Warner BD (2007). “Initial Results of a Dedicated H-G Program.” Minor Planet Bul. 34, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  6. Warner BD (2008). “Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at the Palmer Divide Observatory: September-December 2007.” Minor Planet Bull. 35, 67–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Warner BD, Harris AW, Pravec P (2009a). “The Asteroid Lightcurve Database.” Icarus 202, 134–146. Updated 2015 Dec. http://www.minorplanet.info/lightcurvedatabase.html [Google Scholar]
  8. Warner BD, Harris AW, Vokrouhlicky D, Nesvorny D, Bottke WF (2009b). “Analysis of the Hungaria asteroid population.” Icarus 204, 172–182. [Google Scholar]
  9. Warner BD (2011a). “Lightcurve Analysis at the Palmer Divide Observatory: 2010 June-September.” Minor Planet Bull. 38, 25–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Warner BD (2011b). “Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at the Palmer Divide Observatory: 2010 December- 2011 March.” Minor Planet Bull. 38, 142–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner BD (2014). “Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at CS3-Palmer Divide Station: 2014 January-March.” Minor Planet Bull. 41, 144–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES