Skip to main content
NASA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NASA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Minor Planet Bull. 2015 Oct-Dec;42(4):286–290.

LIGHTCURVE PHOTOMETRY OPPORTUNITIES: 2015 OCTOBER-DECEMBER

Brian D Warner 1, Alan W Harris 2, Josef Ďurech 3, Lance AM Benner 4
PMCID: PMC7244019  NIHMSID: NIHMS1570081  PMID: 32455363

Abstract

We present lists of asteroid photometry opportunities for objects reaching a favorable apparition and have no or poorly-defined lightcurve parameters. Additional data on these objects will help with shape and spin axis modeling via lightcurve inversion. We also include lists of objects that will be the target of radar observations. Lightcurves for these objects can help constrain pole solutions and/or remove rotation period ambiguities that might not come from using radar data alone.


We present several lists of asteroids that are prime targets for photometry during the period 2015 October-December.

In the first three sets of tables, “Dec” is the declination and “U” is the quality code of the lightcurve. See the asteroid lightcurve data base (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009) documentation for an explanation of the U code:

http://www.minorplanet.info/lightcurvedatabase.html

The ephemeris generator on the CALL web site allows you to create custom lists for objects reaching V ≤ 18.5 during any month in the current year, e.g., limiting the results by magnitude and declination.

http://www.minorplanet.info/PHP/call_OppLCDBQuery.php

We refer you to past articles, e.g., Minor Planet Bulletin 36, 188, for more detailed discussions about the individual lists and points of advice regarding observations for objects in each list.

Once you’ve obtained and analyzed your data, it’s important to publish your results. Papers appearing in the Minor Planet Bulletin are indexed in the Astrophysical Data System (ADS) and so can be referenced by others in subsequent papers. It’s also important to make the data available at least on a personal website or upon request. We urge you to consider submitting your raw data to the ALCDEF page on the Minor Planet Center web site:

http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/light_curve

We believe this to be the largest publicly available database of raw lightcurve data that contains 1.9 million observations for more than 2800 objects.

Now that many backyard astronomers and small colleges have access to larger telescopes, we have expanded the photometry opportunities and spin axis lists to include asteroids reaching V = 15.5.

In both of those lists, a line in italics text indicates a near-Earth asteroid (NEA). In the spin axis list, a line in bold text indicates a particularly favorable apparition. To keep the number of objects manageable, the opportunities list includes only those objects reaching a particularly favorable apparition, meaning they could all be set in bold text.

Lightcurve/Photometry Opportunities

Objects with U = 3− or 3 are excluded from this list since they will likely appear in the list below for shape and spin axis modeling. Those asteroids rated U = 1 should be given higher priority over those rated U = 2 or 2+, but not necessarily over those with no period. On the other hand, do not overlook asteroids with U = 2/2+ on the assumption that the period is sufficiently established. Regardless, do not let the existing period influence your analysis since even high quality ratings have been proven wrong at times. Note that the lightcurve amplitude in the tables could be more or less than what’s given. Use the listing only as a guide.

Brightest LCDB Data
Number Name Date Mag Dec Period Amp U
9165 Raup 10 03.8 14.5 −2 560. 1.05 2
12331 1992 UH6 10 04.5 15.1 −6 2.727 0.02 1
1237 Genevieve 10 04.9 13.8 −7 16.37 0.17–0.23 2−
1878 Hughes 10 04.9 15.3 +4
6827 Wombat 10 08.1 15.4 +12 40.1315 0.34 2
3489 Lottie 10 08.6 15.4 +5
2974 Holden 10 08.8 14.9 +10
4815 Anders 10 09.2 15.5 +8
5047 Zanda 10 09.3 15.5 +8
3811 Karma 10 11.3 14.4 +17 11.52 0.20 2
5840 Raybrown 10 13.9 15.3 +7
9851 Sakamoto 10 13.9 15.0 −1
10707 1981 UV23 10 15.2 14.6 −1
4272 Entsuji 10 15.9 13.8 +3
3000 Leonardo 10 19.0 15.0 +9
1016 Anitra 10 20.0 13.6 +13 5.9288 0.28–0.50 2+
3055 Annapavlova 10 21.3 15.4 +21 > 7.
25282 1998 WR 10 22.1 15.1 −3 11.5129 0.40 2
303142 2004 DU24 10 22.8 15.4 +7
705 Erminia 10 22.9 12.6 +28 53.96 0.05–0.17 2
18005 1999 JD91 10 23.1 15.5 −5
26514 2000 CH48 10 23.5 14.9 +7 4.963 0.72 2
5364 1980 RC1 10 25.9 15.1 +18
6339 Giliberti 10 25.9 15.4 +19
4273 Dunhuang 10 28.8 15.1 +7
2343 Siding Spring 10 29.0 13.9 +13
2941 Alden 10 30.3 15.0 +16
1654 Bojeva 10 30.9 14.3 +17 0.1
2959 Scholl 10 31.3 14.9 +6 >16. 0.14 1
4950 House 10 31.3 15.4 +4 0.18
6734 Benzenberg 10 31.8 15.3 +8 0.19
11268 Spassky 11 01.5 15.2 +13
9533 Aleksejleonov 11 01.6 15.5 +11
9060 Toyokawa 11 02.2 15.4 +18
5236 Yoko 11 02.7 15.1 +12 2.768 0.30 2+
14890 1991 VG3 11 03.9 15.5 +13
2787 Tovarishch 11 09.8 15.3 +21
13487 1981 VN 11 10.9 15.3 +21
24602 Mozzhorin 11 10.9 15.3 +16
1001 Gaussia 11 15.9 13.5 +25 9.17 0.04–0.16 2−
5960 Wakkanai 11 16.3 15.1 +20
25332 1999 KK6 11 16.7 15.4 +5 2.4139 0.06–0.08 2+
46620 1994 EL1 11 16.8 15.5 +10 >20. 0.2 2
838 Seraphina 11 16.9 13.4 +20 15.67 0.07–0.30 2
5226 Pollack 11 17.1 15.3 +14 2.725 0.30 2
28321 Arnabdey 11 17.1 15.2 +20
2387 Xi'an 11 19.5 15.0 +20 4.2985 0.24 2
2947 Kippenhahn 11 20.0 14.6 +24 10.5 0.42 2
12738 Satoshimiki 11 20.7 15.2 −8 8.7081 0.20–0.25 2+
4747 Jujo 11 23.2 15.4 +20
2906 Caltech 11 25.6 14.2 +1 12.99 0.16 2
3149 Okudzhava 11 27.0 15.3 +9 2.58 0.3 2
3433 Fehrenbach 11 27.2 14.3 +30 3.9178 0.26 2
1912 Anubis 11 27.7 15.1 +20 4.6256 0.47 2
11643 1997 AM22 12 01.5 15.5 +15
14625 1998 UH31 12 03.1 14.7 +26 4.4873 0.38 2
3613 Kunlun 12 06.0 15.3 +23
7302 1993 CQ 12 09.8 15.3 +11 3.2754 0.19 2
2545 Verbiest 12 11.1 14.4 +34 10. 0.06 1+
3136 Anshan 12 11.1 15.5 +23
1249 Rutherfordia 12 11.3 13.4 +23 18.2 0.69–0.81 2+
2758 Cordelia 12 15.2 15.5 +29
3115 Baily 12 17.3 13.3 +21 16.22 0.08–0.14 2+
4762 Dobrynya 12 19.4 15.1 +37
4904 Makio 12 20.2 15.0 +12 7.83 0.08 2
21609 Williamcaleb 12 23.7 15.4 +10 112. 0.5 2
2282 Andres Bello 12 27.3 15.1 +14

Low Phase Angle Opportunities

The Low Phase Angle list includes asteroids that reach very low phase angles. The “α” column is the minimum solar phase angle for the asteroid. Getting accurate, calibrated measurements (usually V band) at or very near the day of opposition can provide important information for those studying the “opposition effect.” Use the on-line query form for the LCDB

http://www.minorplanet.info/PHP/call_OppLCDBQuery.php to get more details about a specific asteroid.

You will have the best chance of success working objects with low amplitude and periods that allow covering at least half a cycle every night. Objects with large amplitudes and/or long periods are much more difficult for phase angle studies since, for proper analysis, the data must be reduced to the average magnitude of the asteroid for each night. This reduction requires that you determine the period and the amplitude of the lightcurve; for long period objects that can be tricky. Refer to Harris, et al., 1989 (“Phase Relations of High Albedo Asteroids.” Icarus 81, p365 ff) for the details of the analysis procedure.

As an aside, some use the maximum light to find the phase slope parameter (G). However, this can produce a significantly different value for both H and G versus when using average light, which is the method used for values listed by the Minor Planet Center.

Num Name Date α V Dec Period Amp U
74 Galatea 10 01.7 0.60 10.6 +04 17.268 0.08–0.16 3
2159 Kukkamaki 10 01.8 0.64 15.1 +05 4.06 0.32 3
2899 Runrun Shaw 10 02.7 0.62 14.9 +02
5674 Wolff 10 02.7 0.90 14.8 +02
215 Oenone 10 02.8 0.29 12.7 +03 27.937 0.18–0.20 3
32774 1986 VZ 10 02.9 0.53 15.5 +03
1023 Thomana 10 03.0 0.49 13.5 +05 17.56 0.27–0.36 3−
158 Koronis 10 03.9 0.57 12.8 +05 14.218 0.28–0.43 3
13762 1998 SG130 10 04.4 0.54 14.5 +03
1878 Hughes 10 04.9 0.07 15.3 +04
82 Alkmene 10 05.1 0.35 12.4 +04 12.999 0.18–0.54 3
3039 Yangel 10 07.2 0.49 15.5 +04
1938 Lausanna 10 07.4 0.85 15.5 +04
1735 ITA 10 08.6 0.75 14.1 +08 12.599 0.27 3−
3489 Lottie 10 08.6 0.34 15.3 +05
2591 Dworetsky 10 09.0 0.25 15.3 +07 12.77 0.45 2
5047 Zanda 10 09.2 0.72 15.5 +08
586 Thekla 10 10.0 0.42 13.3 +08 13.670 0.22–0.30 3
561 Ingwelde 10 11.1 0.43 15.5 +06 12.012 0.38 3
2323 Zverev 10 11.9 0.50 15.1 +08 3.921 0.36–0.39 3
3791 Marci 10 12.2 0.55 15.5 +09
5840 Raybrown 10 13.9 0.23 15.3 +07
340 Eduarda 10 14.0 0.37 12.9 +07 8.0062 0.17–0.32 3
162 Laurentia 10 14.4 0.69 13.4 +06 11.8686 0.28–0.35 3
1894 Haffner 10 14.7 0.46 15.4 +09
80019 1999 HL2 10 14.7 0.26 15.4 +08
855 Newcombia 10 14.8 0.46 14.9 +09 3.003 0.35 3
3454 Lieske 10 15.8 0.75 15.0 +07
187 Lamberta 10 16.1 0.07 12.7 +09 10.670 0.23–0.32 3
229 Adelinda 10 16.4 0.16 13.2 +09 6.60 0.04–0.30 3
30988 2000 WT141 10 18.2 0.54 15.5 +08
3000 Leonardo 10 19.0 0.21 14.9 +09
761 Brendelia 10 19.1 0.05 14.3 +10 57.96 0.25 2+
4017 Disneya 10 19.7 0.29 15.5 +09
2042 Sitarski 10 20.0 0.57 15.5 +11
417 Suevia 10 21.5 0.44 13.6 +09 7.034 0.06–0.22 3
362 Havnia 10 24.7 0.34 11.9 +12 16.92 0.09–0.11 3
3415 Danby 10 26.3 0.46 14.7 +14 5.666 0.09–0.18 3
147 Protogeneia 10 29.3 0.51 12.7 +15 7.8528 0.25–0.28 3
8579 Hieizan 10 29.7 0.80 15.7 +12
2369 Chekhov 10 29.8 0.31 15.5 +13
3403 Tammy 10 31.4 0.76 15.5 +12 11.85 0.10 1
797 Montana 11 01.1 0.92 13.8 +17 4.5463 0.32–0.50 3
5508 Gomyou 11 01.2 0.20 15.4 +15
11268 Spassky 11 01.4 0.95 15.2 +13
257 Silesia 11 02.3 0.22 13.0 +15 15.7095 0.29–0.30 3
1704 Wachmann 11 04.2 0.45 15.4 +16 3.314 0.40 3
1257 Mora 11 04.9 0.32 15.4 +15 5.2948 0.23–0.43 3
3987 Wujek 11 07.7 0.26 15.0 +16
1128 Astrid 11 09.1 0.14 14.4 +16 10.228 0.29 2+
24602 Mozzhorin 11 11.0 0.74 15.2 +16
936 Kunigunde 11 12.1 0.26 14.4 +17 8.80 0.25 2
5401 Minamioda 11 13.2 0.44 14.7 +19
919 Ilsebill 11 13.3 0.15 14.4 +18 5.0325 0.25 3
1421 Esperanto 11 13.5 0.59 14.9 +20 21.982 0.15–0.42 3−
13165 1995 WS1 11 14.2 0.54 15.3 +19
1151 Ithaka 11 15.5 0.83 14.7 +17 4.9312 0.12–0.15 3
5960 Wakkanai 11 16.4 0.82 15.0 +20
838 Seraphina 11 17.0 0.67 13.4 +20 15.67 0.07–0.30 2
28321 Arnabdey 11 17.2 0.51 15.2 +20
1343 Nicole 11 17.7 0.79 14.5 +21 70. 0.29 1
2387 Xi’an 11 19.5 0.38 14.9 +20
6476 1987 VT 11 20.3 0.59 15.3 +21
156 Xanthippe 11 21.1 0.27 13.1 +21 22.37 0.10–0.12 3
4012 Geballe 11 22.0 0.49 14.7 +21
26 Proserpina 11 22.7 0.46 11.2 +21 13.110 0.08–0.21 3
1540 Kevola 11 23.1 0.86 14.6 +23 20.082 0.23 3−
4747 Jujo 11 23.2 0.27 15.4 +20
2197 Shanghai 11 24.2 0.14 15.3 +21 5.99 0.16 2
1857 Parchomenko 11 24.3 0.45 13.8 +20 3.1177 0.22–0.27 3
243 Ida 11 24.7 0.63 13.5 +22 4.634 0.40–0.86 3
640 Brambilla 11 24.8 0.70 13.8 +18 7.768 0.25 3
8610 Goldhaber 11 25.0 0.04 15.3 +21
1545 Thernoe 11 25.9 0.38 14.7 +22 17.20 0.76 3
4801 Ohre 11 27.4 0.20 15.4 +21 32.000 0.50–0.60 3
1912 Anubis 11 27.7 0.38 15.1 +20
3249 Musashino 11 29.4 0.66 14.6 +20 4.5527 0.55 3
1363 Herberta 11 30.0 0.30 15.1 +21
1480 Aunus 11 30.1 0.30 14.9 +22
523 Ada 12 01.6 0.61 12.8 +23 10.03 0.52–0.70 3
3606 Pohjola 12 01.7 0.28 14.6 +22
4323 Hortulus 12 01.8 0.83 15.0 +23 4.7354 0.23 3−
403 Cyane 12 02.1 0.46 12.3 +21 12.283 0.21–0.45 3
220 Stephania 12 02.2 0.92 13.4 +24 18.198 0.21–0.45 3
13388 1999 AE6 12 03.7 0.90 15.0 +20
3613 Kunlun 12 06.0 0.08 15.3 +23
2847 Parvati 12 07.5 0.29 15.3 +22
268 Adorea 12 07.8 0.77 12.7 +20 7.80 0.15–0.20 3
579 Sidonia 12 09.0 0.58 12.1 +21 16.286 0.02–0.28 3−
6384 Kervin 12 09.1 0.26 15.0 +22 3.6203 0.06–0.10 3
395 Delia 12 09.2 0.13 14.4 +23 19.71 0.25 2
1576 Fabiola 12 09.3 0.56 14.4 +21 6.7 0.2 2
2534 Houzeau 12 09.9 0.42 15.1 +22
15305 1992 WT1 12 10.5 0.62 15.5 +22
3136 Anshan 12 11.1 0.12 15.5 +23
2972 Niilo 12 11.9 0.77 15.5 +21
580 Selene 12 13.7 0.57 14.1 +21 9.47 0.27 3−
2555 Thomas 12 14.3 0.23 15.3 +24
2476 Andersen 12 14.7 0.14 15.1 +23
1498 Lahti 12 14.9 0.37 15.4 +24 58. 0.8 1+
951 Gaspra 12 16.4 0.77 13.1 +22 7.042 0.2 1.0 3
1667 Pels 12 16.4 0.23 14.8 +24 3.268 0.20–0.42 3
3115 Baily 12 17.3 0.88 13.3 +21 16.22 0.08–0.14 2+
20762 2000 EE36 12 21.0 0.06 14.9 +24 8.891 0.46 3−
1078 Mentha 12 21.5 0.61 13.6 +22 85. 0.87 3
27 Euterpe 12 25.1 0.14 8.4 +23 10.4082 0.13–0.21 3
1306 Scythia 12 25.8 0.17 13.5 +24 7.525 0.15–0.25 3
1725 CrAO 12 26.7 0.67 15.3 +21 21.45 0.08–0.28 3
2563 Boyarchuk 12 27.7 0.35 15.4 +22 11.04 0.11 2
1209 Pumma 12 31.3 0.43 15.5 +25 8.5001

Shape/Spin Modeling Opportunities

Those doing work for modeling should contact Josef Ďurech at the email address above. If looking to add lightcurves for objects with existing models, visit the Database of Asteroid Models from Inversion Techniques (DAMIT) web site

http://astro.troja.mff.cuni.cz/projects/asteroids3D

An additional dense lightcurve, along with sparse data, could lead to the asteroid being added to or improving one in DAMIT, thus increasing the total number of asteroids with spin axis and shape models.

Included in the list below are objects that:

  1. Are rated U = 3− or 3 in the LCDB

  2. Do not have reported pole in the LCDB Summary table

  3. Have at least three entries in the Details table of the LCDB where the lightcurve is rated U > 2.

The caveat for condition #3 is that no check was made to see if the lightcurves are from the same apparition or if the phase angle bisector longitudes differ significantly from the upcoming apparition. The last check is often not possible because the LCDB does not list the approximate date of observations for all details records. Including that information is an on-going project.

Brightest LCDB Data
Num Name Date Mag Dec Period Amp U
1459 Magnya 10 01.6 13.5 −13 4.678 0.57–0.85 3
74 Galatea 10 01.8 10.6 +4 17.268 0.08–0.16 3
3870 Mayre 10 02.7 15.2 +8 3.9915 0.44–0.45 3
215 Oenone 10 02.8 12.7 +3 27.937 0.18–0.20 3
1023 Thomana 10 03.0 13.5 +5 17.56 0.27–0.36 3−
2074 Shoemaker 10 05.9 15.2 +24 2.5328 0.06–0.12 3
514 Armida 10 06.6 13.0 +10 21.851 0.16–0.42 3
729 Watsonia 10 07.3 13.9 −17 25.23 0.17–0.30 3
890 Waltraut 10 08.5 15.2 −2 12.581 0.32–0.36 3
266 Aline 10 09.6 11.9 +20 13.018 0.07–0.10 3
586 Thekla 10 10.0 13.3 +8 13.67 0.22–0.30 3
929 Algunde 10 10.3 14.3 +10 3.3102 0.13–0.19 3
2323 Zverev 10 11.9 15.1 +8 3.921 0.36–0.39 3
1967 Menzel 10 12.3 13.7 +2 2.835 0.24–0.39 3
3915 Fukushima 10 13.0 15.2 −2 9.418 0.50–0.79 3
759 Vinifera 10 13.3 13.9 +39 14.229 0.36–0.40 3
66146 1998 TU3 10 14.2 15.5 +9 2.375 0.07–0.15 3
855 Newcombia 10 14.7 14.9 +9 3.003 0.33–0.41 3
782 Montefiore 10 16.0 13.9 +1 4.0728 0.42–0.45 3
908 Buda 10 19.2 14.0 −10 14.572 0.09–0.41 3
212 Medea 10 20.1 12.1 +16 10.283 0.04–0.16 3
754 Malabar 10 20.1 13.6 −6 11.74 0.19–0.38 3
947 Monterosa 10 20.9 11.8 +6 5.164 0.15–0.23 3−
362 Havnia 10 24.7 11.9 +12 16.92 0.09–0.17 3
4159 Freeman 10 25.0 14.4 −10 4.4021 0.23–0.40 3
3285 Ruth Wolfe 10 25.3 14.6 +33 3.919 0.20 3
3415 Danby 10 26.2 14.8 +14 5.666 0.09–0.18 3
143 Adria 10 26.9 13.4 +27 22.005 0.05–0.10 3
530 Turandot 10 27.0 13.2 +1 19.96 0.10–0.16 3−
1093 Freda 10 27.2 12.9 −1 19.67 0.04–0.21 3
380 Fiducia 10 29.1 12.6 +5 13.69 0.04–0.32 3
3873 Roddy 10 30.3 15.3 +37 2.4782 0.05–0.11 3
797 Montana 11 01.0 13.8 +17 4.5463 0.32–0.50 3
785 Zwetana 11 03.3 13.8 +5 8.8882 0.13–0.18 3
1425 Tuorla 11 04.7 15.1 +4 7.75 0.17–0.40 3
1257 Mora 11 04.9 15.4 +15 5.2948 0.23–0.43 3
975 Perseverantia 11 05.2 13.9 +16 7.267 0.14–0.23 3
275 Sapientia 11 05.9 13.1 +9 14.931 0.05–0.12 3−
1274 Delportia 11 07.5 14.9 +23 5.615 0.05–0.09 3
1730 Marceline 11 08.1 14.5 +3 3.837 0.94–1.00 3
235 Carolina 11 08.9 12.9 +12 17.61 0.30–0.38 3
3640 Gostin 11 10.5 14.6 +24 3.2641 0.40–0.47 3
2448 Sholokhov 11 12.4 15.4 −7 10.061 0.21–0.63 3−
1115 Sabauda 11 14.4 13.7 +10 6.75 0.16–0.27 3−
1151 Ithaka 11 15.3 14.7 +17 4.9311 0.12–0.15 3
517 Edith 11 16.2 12.6 +22 9.2747 0.08–0.18 3
1999 Hirayama 11 17.3 15.4 +1 15.63 0.45–0.57 3−
6823 1988 ED1 11 19.7 14.9 +4 2.546 0.10–0.30 3−
156 Xanthippe 11 21.1 13.1 +21 22.37 0.10–0.12 3
11424 1999 LZ24 11 22.7 14.1 +17 2.925 0.08 3
240 Vanadis 11 24.4 11.1 +17 10.64 0.30–0.34 3
3682 Welther 11 24.7 13.7 +27 3.5973 0.21–0.35 3
118 Peitho 11 25.1 11.1 +24 7.8055 0.08–0.33 3
698 Ernestina 11 25.1 14.6 +27 5.0363 0.30–0.69 3
504 Cora 11 25.9 13.2 +7 7.588 0.20–0.27 3−
1077 Campanula 11 27.1 14.5 +31 3.8508 0.24–0.40 3
4801 Ohre 11 27.4 15.4 +21 32. 0.50–0.60 3
3028 Zhangguoxi 11 28.1 15.1 +10 4.826 0.12–0.25 3
1225 Ariane 11 30.2 14.1 +26 5.5068 0.30–0.36 3
689 Zita 11 30.9 14.3 +11 6.425 0.30–0.62 3
1376 Michelle 12 01.9 15.1 +16 5.9748 0.03–0.20 3
2294 Andronikov 12 02.1 14.9 +29 3.1529 0.35–0.42 3
5806 Archieroy 12 04.8 15.2 +54 12.163 0.34–0.47 3
762 Pulcova 12 06.3 12.6 +38 5.839 0.18–0.30 3
6384 Kervin 12 09.0 15.1 +22 3.6203 0.06–0.10 3
348 May 12 09.8 13.1 +19 7.3812 0.14–0.16 3
33342 1998 WT24# 12 10.6 11.3 +2 3.697 0.25–0.56 3
1864 Daedalus 12 10.9 15.4 +52 8.572 0.85–1.04 3
204 Kallisto 12 11.3 13.4 +13 19.489 0.09–0.26 3
756 Lilliana 12 12.3 15.1 +1 7.834 0.18–0.99 3
1667 Pels 12 16.3 14.8 +24 3.268 0.20–0.42 3
2105 Gudy 12 17.7 13.3 +33 15.795 0.18–0.52 3−
888 Parysatis 12 18.7 12.2 +8 5.9314 0.22–0.26 3
1520 Imatra 12 20.1 14.5 +18 18.635 0.27–0.35 3−
4254 Kamel 12 22.1 14.9 +2 2.739 0.17–0.19 3
1830 Pogson 12 22.9 14.6 +17 2.57 0.10–0.17 3
1017 Jacqueline 12 24.2 14.4 +18 7.87 0.6–0.72 3
131 Vala 12 25.1 13.2 +27 5.1812 0.09–0.32 3
2004 Lexell 12 25.1 14.6 +28 5.4429 0.42–0.51 3
289 Nenetta 12 25.5 13.2 +13 6.902 0.11–0.19 3
5080 Oja 12 26.3 14.5 +34 7.222 0.31–0.39 3
1505 Koranna 12 26.6 15.3 +14 4.451 0.55–0.70 3
373 Melusina 12 27.4 13.9 +45 12.97 0.20–0.25 3
635 Vundtia 12 27.8 13.3 +7 11.79 0.15–0.27 3
309 Fraternitas 12 28.0 14.6 +29 22.398 0.10–0.13 3
1523 Pieksamaki 12 30.3 14.5 +31 5.3202 0.28–0.47 3

Radar-Optical Opportunities

There are several resources to help plan observations in support of radar.

Future radar targets:

http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/~lance/future.radar.nea.periods.html

Past radar targets:

http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/~lance/radar.nea.periods.html

Arecibo targets:

http://www.naic.edu/~pradar/sched.shtml

http://www.naic.edu/~pradar

Goldstone targets:

http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/goldstone_asteroid_schedule.html

However, these are based on known targets at the time the list was prepared. It is very common for newly discovered objects to move up the list and become radar targets on short notice. We recommend that you keep up with the latest discoveries using the RSS feeds from the Minor Planet Center

http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/rss/mpc_feeds.html

In particular, monitor the NEA feed and be flexible with your observing program. In some cases, you may have only 1-3 days when the asteroid is within reach of your equipment. Be sure to keep in touch with the radar team (through Dr. Benner’s email listed above) if you get data. The team may not always be observing the target but, in some cases, your initial results may change their plans. In all cases, your efforts are greatly appreciated.

Use the ephemerides below as a guide to your best chances for observing, but remember that photometry may be possible before and/or after the ephemerides given below. Note that geocentric positions are given. Use these web sites to generate updated and topocentric positions:

MPC: http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html

JPL: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons

In the ephemerides below, ED and SD are, respectively, the Earth and Sun distances (AU), V is the estimated Johnson V magnitude, and α is the phase angle. SE and ME are the great circles distances (in degrees) of the Sun and Moon from the asteroid. MP is the lunar phase and GB is the galactic latitude. “PHA” in the header indicates that the object is a “potentially hazardous asteroid”, meaning that at some (long distant) time, its orbit might take it very close to Earth.

Some of the targets listed here may be carry-overs from the previous quarter’s photometry opportunities article since they are still reachable targets for at least part of the covered quarter-year.

(436724) 2011 UW158 (Oct, H = 19.4, PHA)

This asteroid continues to be an accessible target in early October. It made its closest approach on 2015 July 19 (0.0164 AU) and, at the time this was written in early July, was predicted to be one of the strongest radar target in years. Extensive work by Bruce Gary in 2015 June and July (http://www.brucegary.net/UW158/) found, among other things, a period of 0.610843 ± 0.00005 h (or about 36.651 minutes) with an amplitude of 0.52 mag at a phase angle of 80.5°. The amplitude at low phase angles may be considerably less. Don’t let the existing results dissuade you from obtaining additional data. Observations in October will be at much lower phase angles and so be helpful for modeling the asteroid when combined with existing data.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
10/01 23 54.8 +23 18 0.27 1.25 18.0 17.3 158 48 −0.87 −38
10/02 23 54.5 +22 56 0.27 1.26 18.1 16.9 159 61 −0.78 −38
10/03 23 54.3 +22 33 0.28 1.26 18.1 16.7 159 74 −0.68 −38
10/04 23 54.1 +22 11 0.28 1.27 18.2 16.4 159 86 −0.57 −39
10/05 23 53.9 +21 49 0.29 1.27 18.2 16.2 159 99 −0.47 −39
10/06 23 53.7 +21 28 0.29 1.28 18.2 16.1 159 111 −0.37 −39
10/07 23 53.6 +21 07 0.30 1.28 18.3 16.0 159 122 −0.28 −40
10/08 23 53.5 +20 46 0.31 1.29 18.3 16.0 159 133 −0.19 −40

3200 Phaethon (Oct-Dec, H = 14.6, PHA)

The period for this NEA is well-known at ~3.604 h. Additional observations will help model the asteroid, including a check on whether YORP (a thermal effect) is causing the spin rotation to speed up or down.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
10/01 04 00.6 +42 16 1.66 2.31 18.6 22.4 118 31 −0.88 −8
10/11 03 43.9 +42 44 1.57 2.34 18.4 19.2 130 111 −0.03 −10
10/21 03 21.7 +42 34 1.50 2.36 18.2 15.4 141 115 +0.52 −12
10/31 02 55.8 +41 33 1.46 2.38 18.0 11.6 151 42 −0.84 −16
11/10 02 29.2 +39 37 1.45 2.39 17.9 9.5 156 148 −0.03 −19
11/20 02 05.2 +36 57 1.48 2.40 18.0 10.8 153 67 +0.58 −24
11/30 01 46.1 +33 56 1.54 2.40 18.2 14.1 144 85 −0.81 −28
12/10 01 32.6 +30 58 1.62 2.40 18.5 17.6 132 143 −0.02 −31

(163899) 2003 SD220 (Oct-Dec, H = 16.8, PHA)

The rotation period for this NEA is not known. The estimated diameter is 1.2 km, so it is unlikely that the rotation period is < 2h. The very large phase angles could make for some unusually shaped lightcurves due to deep shadowing effects.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
10/01 08 58.9 +49 57 0.26 0.94 17.3 96.2 69 79 −0.88 +41
10/11 09 12.0 +49 03 0.25 0.96 17.0 90.6 75 58 −0.03 +43
10/21 09 29.8 +47 32 0.23 0.98 16.7 86.4 80 143 +0.52 +46
10/31 09 50.8 +45 23 0.21 1.00 16.4 83.3 84 58 −0.84 +50
11/10 10 14.7 +42 23 0.19 1.00 16.1 81.3 88 70 −0.03 +55
11/20 10 42.1 +38 04 0.16 1.00 15.7 80.7 90 149 +0.58 +61
11/30 11 14.9 +31 15 0.13 1.00 15.3 82.4 90 46 −0.81 +69
12/10 11 58.3 +19 22 0.10 0.98 14.9 88.5 86 69 −0.02 +76
12/20 13 00.3 −01 48 0.08 0.96 15.0 102.7 73 177 +0.66 +61
12/30 14 30.6 −28 54 0.08 0.94 16.2 121.9 54 72 −0.79 +29

(206378) 2003 RB (Oct-Dec, H = 18.7, PHA)

Pravec et al. (2003) reported a period of P > 16 h and amplitude A > 0.2 mag. The low galactic latitudes may make this a difficult target. The long period makes it a good project for a collaboration of observers at significantly different longitudes.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
10/01 06 55.7 +56 58 0.18 1.01 17.9 81.2 89 61 −0.88 +23
10/11 07 14.8 +54 51 0.21 1.04 18.0 74.2 94 76 −0.03 +25
10/21 07 22.8 +53 15 0.24 1.07 18.1 66.2 101 142 +0.52 +26
10/31 07 21.1 +51 58 0.26 1.11 18.1 57.3 110 39 −0.84 +25
11/10 07 09.7 +50 47 0.28 1.16 18.1 47.6 120 103 −0.03 +23
11/20 06 49.2 +49 16 0.31 1.21 18.1 37.2 132 118 +0.58 +20
11/30 06 23.3 +47 03 0.33 1.27 18.0 26.7 145 37 −0.81 +15
12/10 05 57.5 +44 04 0.37 1.33 18.1 17.3 156 142 −0.02 +10

(413577) 2005 UL5 (Nov, H = 20.0, PHA)

Thomas et al. (2014; Icarus 228, 217-246) report this is a type Sq asteroid. Given this, the estimated size for the NEA is about 270 meters. The low galactic latitudes will make this a challenge.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
11/10 05 51.3 +03 15 0.11 1.07 17.2 40.3 135 119 −0.03 −12
11/11 05 54.9 +03 04 0.10 1.07 17.0 40.7 135 130 −0.01 −11
11/12 05 59.2 +02 49 0.09 1.06 16.7 41.3 135 140 +0.00 −10
11/13 06 04.6 +02 32 0.08 1.05 16.5 42.2 135 149 +0.02 −9
11/14 06 11.6 +02 10 0.07 1.04 16.2 43.4 134 158 +0.05 −8
11/15 06 21.0 +01 40 0.06 1.03 15.8 45.2 132 162 +0.11 −6
11/16 06 34.5 +00 57 0.05 1.02 15.5 48.1 130 162 +0.18 −3
11/17 06 55.1 −00 08 0.04 1.01 15.1 52.7 126 159 +0.26 +1
11/18 07 30.4 −01 59 0.03 1.00 14.6 60.9 118 156 +0.36 +8
11/19 08 38.2 −05 21 0.02 0.99 14.4 77.2 102 158 +0.47 +21
11/20 10 50.1 −10 15 0.02 0.98 15.2 109.0 70 162 +0.58 +42
11/21 13 23.9 −11 45 0.02 0.97 18.9 144.9 35 147 +0.69 +50

(33342) 1998 WT24 (Nov-Jan, H = 18.0, PHA)

The period for 1998 WT24 is known to be about 3.698 h. This makes it a potential binary candidate, so higher-precision data are encouraged.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
11/01 09 06.6 −05 59 0.19 0.97 17.4 91.1 78 44 −0.75 +26
11/11 08 58.9 −06 07 0.15 1.00 16.6 82.4 89 83 −0.01 +25
11/21 08 43.5 −06 12 0.10 1.01 15.6 72.3 102 139 +0.69 +21
12/01 07 56.9 −05 26 0.06 1.02 13.8 55.5 122 24 −0.72 +12
12/11 04 17.3 +02 24 0.03 1.01 11.3 23.5 156 163 +0.00 −32
12/21 00 01.4 +09 23 0.05 0.99 14.4 81.4 96 28 +0.76 −52
12/31 23 01.3 +09 41 0.10 0.96 16.5 102.2 72 165 −0.70 −45
01/10 22 35.0 +09 06 0.14 0.91 18.0 116.0 57 56 +0.00 −41

3122 Florence (Dec-Feb, H = 14.2, PHA)

Here is another potential binary candidate: the rotation period is known to be 2.358 h. Observations throughout the ephemeris period can help establish the H and G parameters. The estimated size is 4.5 km.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
12/01 11 16.4 +15 09 1.80 1.97 18.1 29.9 84 34 −0.72 +65
12/11 11 23.3 +13 52 1.72 2.01 18.1 29.2 92 87 +0.00 +66
12/21 11 27.3 +12 48 1.63 2.06 18.0 28.0 101 137 +0.76 +66
12/31 11 28.0 +11 59 1.54 2.10 17.8 26.0 111 9 −0.70 +65
01/10 11 24.9 +11 25 1.46 2.14 17.7 23.1 121 120 +0.00 +64
01/20 11 17.7 +11 06 1.39 2.18 17.5 19.3 133 98 +0.82 +63
01/30 11 06.4 +11 00 1.33 2.22 17.3 14.6 146 33 −0.70 +61
02/09 10 51.7 +11 02 1.30 2.25 17.0 9.0 159 164 +0.00 +58

(294739) 2008 CM (Dec-Jan, H = 17.1, PHA)

Warner (2014, MPB 41, 157-168) found a period of 3.054 h. The amplitude was 0.48 mag at a phase angle α = 70°, about the same as during the first few days of the ephemeris below.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
12/20 14 35.0 +55 09 0.12 0.99 15.7 84.0 89 117 +0.66 +56
12/25 12 11.8 +50 15 0.08 1.01 14.1 68.1 108 80 +1.00 +66
12/30 09 06.6 +15 09 0.06 1.03 12.7 34.9 143 18 −0.79 +37
01/04 07 32.4 −16 45 0.09 1.06 13.8 37.3 139 95 −0.34 +1
01/09 06 50.8 −28 03 0.15 1.08 15.0 44.7 129 133 −0.01 −12
01/14 06 29.6 −32 30 0.20 1.11 15.9 47.7 124 106 +0.19 −18
01/19 06 17.6 −34 29 0.26 1.14 16.5 48.7 120 63 +0.72 −21
01/24 06 10.8 −35 20 0.32 1.17 17.0 48.8 117 59 +1.00 −23

1994 AW1 (Dec-Jan, H = 17.0, PHA)

This is a known binary (Pravec and Hahn, 1997; Icarus 127, 431-440). The primary rotation period is 2.519 h. The orbital period the satellite is 22.3 h, making it difficult for a single station to cover mutual events (occultations and/or eclipses), if viewing geometry allows, thoroughly. This would be a good project for a group of observers who are widely separated in longitude.

DATE RA Dec ED SD V α SE ME MP GB
12/01 20 49.8 +62 58 0.36 1.10 17.8 62.0 99 103 −0.72 +12
12/06 21 30.4 +62 30 0.35 1.11 17.7 60.6 101 111 −0.26 +8
12/11 22 14.4 +61 22 0.34 1.12 17.6 59.1 104 101 +0.00 +4
12/16 22 59.6 +59 21 0.33 1.12 17.5 57.5 106 74 +0.22 +0
12/21 23 43.5 +56 25 0.33 1.13 17.5 56.1 108 54 +0.76 −5
12/26 00 24.0 +52 37 0.32 1.13 17.4 54.8 110 79 −0.99 −10
12/31 01 00.1 +48 08 0.32 1.14 17.4 53.9 111 121 −0.70 −15
01/05 01 31.8 +43 14 0.33 1.14 17.5 53.4 111 145 −0.25 −19

Contributor Information

Brian D. Warner, Center for Solar System Studies / MoreData!, 446 Sycamore Ave., Eaton, CO 80615 USA

Alan W. Harris, MoreData!, La Cañada, CA 91011-3364 USA

Josef Ďurech, Astronomical Institute, Charles University in Prague, 18000 Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC.

Lance A.M. Benner, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 USA

References

  1. Harris AW; Young JW; Contreiras L; Dockweiler T; Belkora L; Salo H; Harris WD; Bowell E; Poutanen M; Binzel RP; Tholen DJ; Wang S (1989) “Phase relations of high albedo asteroids: The unusual opposition brightening of 44 Nysa and 64 Angelina.“ Icarus 81, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pravec P; Wolf M; Sarounova L (2003) http://www.asu.cas.cz/~ppravec/neo.htm
  3. Pravec P; Hahn G (1997) “Two-Period Lightcurve of 1994 AW 1: Indication of a Binary Asteroid?.“ Icarus 127, 431–440. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thomas CA; Emery JP; Trilling DE; Delbó M; Hora JL; Mueller M (2014) “Physical characterization of Warm Spitzer-observed near-Earth objects.“ Icarus 228, 217–246. [Google Scholar]
  5. Warner BD, Harris AW, Pravec P (2009) “The Asteroid Lightcurve Database.“ Icarus 202, 134–146 Updated 2015 June. http://www.minorplanet.info/lightcurvedatabase.html [Google Scholar]
  6. Warner BD (2014) “Near-Earth Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at CS3-Palmer Divide Station: 2014 January-March.“ Minor Planet Bull. 41, 157–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES