Abstract
We present lists of asteroid photometry opportunities for objects reaching a favorable apparition and have no or poorly-defined lightcurve parameters. Additional data on these objects will help with shape and spin axis modeling via lightcurve inversion. We also include lists of objects that will be the target of radar observations. Lightcurves for these objects can help constrain pole solutions and/or remove rotation period ambiguities that might not come from using radar data alone.
We present several lists of asteroids that are prime targets for photometry during the period 2015 October-December.
In the first three sets of tables, “Dec” is the declination and “U” is the quality code of the lightcurve. See the asteroid lightcurve data base (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009) documentation for an explanation of the U code:
The ephemeris generator on the CALL web site allows you to create custom lists for objects reaching V ≤ 18.5 during any month in the current year, e.g., limiting the results by magnitude and declination.
We refer you to past articles, e.g., Minor Planet Bulletin 36, 188, for more detailed discussions about the individual lists and points of advice regarding observations for objects in each list.
Once you’ve obtained and analyzed your data, it’s important to publish your results. Papers appearing in the Minor Planet Bulletin are indexed in the Astrophysical Data System (ADS) and so can be referenced by others in subsequent papers. It’s also important to make the data available at least on a personal website or upon request. We urge you to consider submitting your raw data to the ALCDEF page on the Minor Planet Center web site:
We believe this to be the largest publicly available database of raw lightcurve data that contains 1.9 million observations for more than 2800 objects.
Now that many backyard astronomers and small colleges have access to larger telescopes, we have expanded the photometry opportunities and spin axis lists to include asteroids reaching V = 15.5.
In both of those lists, a line in italics text indicates a near-Earth asteroid (NEA). In the spin axis list, a line in bold text indicates a particularly favorable apparition. To keep the number of objects manageable, the opportunities list includes only those objects reaching a particularly favorable apparition, meaning they could all be set in bold text.
Lightcurve/Photometry Opportunities
Objects with U = 3− or 3 are excluded from this list since they will likely appear in the list below for shape and spin axis modeling. Those asteroids rated U = 1 should be given higher priority over those rated U = 2 or 2+, but not necessarily over those with no period. On the other hand, do not overlook asteroids with U = 2/2+ on the assumption that the period is sufficiently established. Regardless, do not let the existing period influence your analysis since even high quality ratings have been proven wrong at times. Note that the lightcurve amplitude in the tables could be more or less than what’s given. Use the listing only as a guide.
| Brightest | LCDB Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Name | Date | Mag | Dec | Period | Amp | U |
| 9165 | Raup | 10 03.8 | 14.5 | −2 | 560. | 1.05 | 2 |
| 12331 | 1992 UH6 | 10 04.5 | 15.1 | −6 | 2.727 | 0.02 | 1 |
| 1237 | Genevieve | 10 04.9 | 13.8 | −7 | 16.37 | 0.17–0.23 | 2− |
| 1878 | Hughes | 10 04.9 | 15.3 | +4 | |||
| 6827 | Wombat | 10 08.1 | 15.4 | +12 | 40.1315 | 0.34 | 2 |
| 3489 | Lottie | 10 08.6 | 15.4 | +5 | |||
| 2974 | Holden | 10 08.8 | 14.9 | +10 | |||
| 4815 | Anders | 10 09.2 | 15.5 | +8 | |||
| 5047 | Zanda | 10 09.3 | 15.5 | +8 | |||
| 3811 | Karma | 10 11.3 | 14.4 | +17 | 11.52 | 0.20 | 2 |
| 5840 | Raybrown | 10 13.9 | 15.3 | +7 | |||
| 9851 | Sakamoto | 10 13.9 | 15.0 | −1 | |||
| 10707 | 1981 UV23 | 10 15.2 | 14.6 | −1 | |||
| 4272 | Entsuji | 10 15.9 | 13.8 | +3 | |||
| 3000 | Leonardo | 10 19.0 | 15.0 | +9 | |||
| 1016 | Anitra | 10 20.0 | 13.6 | +13 | 5.9288 | 0.28–0.50 | 2+ |
| 3055 | Annapavlova | 10 21.3 | 15.4 | +21 | > 7. | ||
| 25282 | 1998 WR | 10 22.1 | 15.1 | −3 | 11.5129 | 0.40 | 2 |
| 303142 | 2004 DU24 | 10 22.8 | 15.4 | +7 | |||
| 705 | Erminia | 10 22.9 | 12.6 | +28 | 53.96 | 0.05–0.17 | 2 |
| 18005 | 1999 JD91 | 10 23.1 | 15.5 | −5 | |||
| 26514 | 2000 CH48 | 10 23.5 | 14.9 | +7 | 4.963 | 0.72 | 2 |
| 5364 | 1980 RC1 | 10 25.9 | 15.1 | +18 | |||
| 6339 | Giliberti | 10 25.9 | 15.4 | +19 | |||
| 4273 | Dunhuang | 10 28.8 | 15.1 | +7 | |||
| 2343 | Siding Spring | 10 29.0 | 13.9 | +13 | |||
| 2941 | Alden | 10 30.3 | 15.0 | +16 | |||
| 1654 | Bojeva | 10 30.9 | 14.3 | +17 | 0.1 | ||
| 2959 | Scholl | 10 31.3 | 14.9 | +6 | >16. | 0.14 | 1 |
| 4950 | House | 10 31.3 | 15.4 | +4 | 0.18 | ||
| 6734 | Benzenberg | 10 31.8 | 15.3 | +8 | 0.19 | ||
| 11268 | Spassky | 11 01.5 | 15.2 | +13 | |||
| 9533 | Aleksejleonov | 11 01.6 | 15.5 | +11 | |||
| 9060 | Toyokawa | 11 02.2 | 15.4 | +18 | |||
| 5236 | Yoko | 11 02.7 | 15.1 | +12 | 2.768 | 0.30 | 2+ |
| 14890 | 1991 VG3 | 11 03.9 | 15.5 | +13 | |||
| 2787 | Tovarishch | 11 09.8 | 15.3 | +21 | |||
| 13487 | 1981 VN | 11 10.9 | 15.3 | +21 | |||
| 24602 | Mozzhorin | 11 10.9 | 15.3 | +16 | |||
| 1001 | Gaussia | 11 15.9 | 13.5 | +25 | 9.17 | 0.04–0.16 | 2− |
| 5960 | Wakkanai | 11 16.3 | 15.1 | +20 | |||
| 25332 | 1999 KK6 | 11 16.7 | 15.4 | +5 | 2.4139 | 0.06–0.08 | 2+ |
| 46620 | 1994 EL1 | 11 16.8 | 15.5 | +10 | >20. | 0.2 | 2 |
| 838 | Seraphina | 11 16.9 | 13.4 | +20 | 15.67 | 0.07–0.30 | 2 |
| 5226 | Pollack | 11 17.1 | 15.3 | +14 | 2.725 | 0.30 | 2 |
| 28321 | Arnabdey | 11 17.1 | 15.2 | +20 | |||
| 2387 | Xi'an | 11 19.5 | 15.0 | +20 | 4.2985 | 0.24 | 2 |
| 2947 | Kippenhahn | 11 20.0 | 14.6 | +24 | 10.5 | 0.42 | 2 |
| 12738 | Satoshimiki | 11 20.7 | 15.2 | −8 | 8.7081 | 0.20–0.25 | 2+ |
| 4747 | Jujo | 11 23.2 | 15.4 | +20 | |||
| 2906 | Caltech | 11 25.6 | 14.2 | +1 | 12.99 | 0.16 | 2 |
| 3149 | Okudzhava | 11 27.0 | 15.3 | +9 | 2.58 | 0.3 | 2 |
| 3433 | Fehrenbach | 11 27.2 | 14.3 | +30 | 3.9178 | 0.26 | 2 |
| 1912 | Anubis | 11 27.7 | 15.1 | +20 | 4.6256 | 0.47 | 2 |
| 11643 | 1997 AM22 | 12 01.5 | 15.5 | +15 | |||
| 14625 | 1998 UH31 | 12 03.1 | 14.7 | +26 | 4.4873 | 0.38 | 2 |
| 3613 | Kunlun | 12 06.0 | 15.3 | +23 | |||
| 7302 | 1993 CQ | 12 09.8 | 15.3 | +11 | 3.2754 | 0.19 | 2 |
| 2545 | Verbiest | 12 11.1 | 14.4 | +34 | 10. | 0.06 | 1+ |
| 3136 | Anshan | 12 11.1 | 15.5 | +23 | |||
| 1249 | Rutherfordia | 12 11.3 | 13.4 | +23 | 18.2 | 0.69–0.81 | 2+ |
| 2758 | Cordelia | 12 15.2 | 15.5 | +29 | |||
| 3115 | Baily | 12 17.3 | 13.3 | +21 | 16.22 | 0.08–0.14 | 2+ |
| 4762 | Dobrynya | 12 19.4 | 15.1 | +37 | |||
| 4904 | Makio | 12 20.2 | 15.0 | +12 | 7.83 | 0.08 | 2 |
| 21609 | Williamcaleb | 12 23.7 | 15.4 | +10 | 112. | 0.5 | 2 |
| 2282 | Andres Bello | 12 27.3 | 15.1 | +14 | |||
Low Phase Angle Opportunities
The Low Phase Angle list includes asteroids that reach very low phase angles. The “α” column is the minimum solar phase angle for the asteroid. Getting accurate, calibrated measurements (usually V band) at or very near the day of opposition can provide important information for those studying the “opposition effect.” Use the on-line query form for the LCDB
http://www.minorplanet.info/PHP/call_OppLCDBQuery.php to get more details about a specific asteroid.
You will have the best chance of success working objects with low amplitude and periods that allow covering at least half a cycle every night. Objects with large amplitudes and/or long periods are much more difficult for phase angle studies since, for proper analysis, the data must be reduced to the average magnitude of the asteroid for each night. This reduction requires that you determine the period and the amplitude of the lightcurve; for long period objects that can be tricky. Refer to Harris, et al., 1989 (“Phase Relations of High Albedo Asteroids.” Icarus 81, p365 ff) for the details of the analysis procedure.
As an aside, some use the maximum light to find the phase slope parameter (G). However, this can produce a significantly different value for both H and G versus when using average light, which is the method used for values listed by the Minor Planet Center.
| Num | Name | Date | α | V | Dec | Period | Amp | U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | Galatea | 10 01.7 | 0.60 | 10.6 | +04 | 17.268 | 0.08–0.16 | 3 |
| 2159 | Kukkamaki | 10 01.8 | 0.64 | 15.1 | +05 | 4.06 | 0.32 | 3 |
| 2899 | Runrun Shaw | 10 02.7 | 0.62 | 14.9 | +02 | |||
| 5674 | Wolff | 10 02.7 | 0.90 | 14.8 | +02 | |||
| 215 | Oenone | 10 02.8 | 0.29 | 12.7 | +03 | 27.937 | 0.18–0.20 | 3 |
| 32774 | 1986 VZ | 10 02.9 | 0.53 | 15.5 | +03 | |||
| 1023 | Thomana | 10 03.0 | 0.49 | 13.5 | +05 | 17.56 | 0.27–0.36 | 3− |
| 158 | Koronis | 10 03.9 | 0.57 | 12.8 | +05 | 14.218 | 0.28–0.43 | 3 |
| 13762 | 1998 SG130 | 10 04.4 | 0.54 | 14.5 | +03 | |||
| 1878 | Hughes | 10 04.9 | 0.07 | 15.3 | +04 | |||
| 82 | Alkmene | 10 05.1 | 0.35 | 12.4 | +04 | 12.999 | 0.18–0.54 | 3 |
| 3039 | Yangel | 10 07.2 | 0.49 | 15.5 | +04 | |||
| 1938 | Lausanna | 10 07.4 | 0.85 | 15.5 | +04 | |||
| 1735 | ITA | 10 08.6 | 0.75 | 14.1 | +08 | 12.599 | 0.27 | 3− |
| 3489 | Lottie | 10 08.6 | 0.34 | 15.3 | +05 | |||
| 2591 | Dworetsky | 10 09.0 | 0.25 | 15.3 | +07 | 12.77 | 0.45 | 2 |
| 5047 | Zanda | 10 09.2 | 0.72 | 15.5 | +08 | |||
| 586 | Thekla | 10 10.0 | 0.42 | 13.3 | +08 | 13.670 | 0.22–0.30 | 3 |
| 561 | Ingwelde | 10 11.1 | 0.43 | 15.5 | +06 | 12.012 | 0.38 | 3 |
| 2323 | Zverev | 10 11.9 | 0.50 | 15.1 | +08 | 3.921 | 0.36–0.39 | 3 |
| 3791 | Marci | 10 12.2 | 0.55 | 15.5 | +09 | |||
| 5840 | Raybrown | 10 13.9 | 0.23 | 15.3 | +07 | |||
| 340 | Eduarda | 10 14.0 | 0.37 | 12.9 | +07 | 8.0062 | 0.17–0.32 | 3 |
| 162 | Laurentia | 10 14.4 | 0.69 | 13.4 | +06 | 11.8686 | 0.28–0.35 | 3 |
| 1894 | Haffner | 10 14.7 | 0.46 | 15.4 | +09 | |||
| 80019 | 1999 HL2 | 10 14.7 | 0.26 | 15.4 | +08 | |||
| 855 | Newcombia | 10 14.8 | 0.46 | 14.9 | +09 | 3.003 | 0.35 | 3 |
| 3454 | Lieske | 10 15.8 | 0.75 | 15.0 | +07 | |||
| 187 | Lamberta | 10 16.1 | 0.07 | 12.7 | +09 | 10.670 | 0.23–0.32 | 3 |
| 229 | Adelinda | 10 16.4 | 0.16 | 13.2 | +09 | 6.60 | 0.04–0.30 | 3 |
| 30988 | 2000 WT141 | 10 18.2 | 0.54 | 15.5 | +08 | |||
| 3000 | Leonardo | 10 19.0 | 0.21 | 14.9 | +09 | |||
| 761 | Brendelia | 10 19.1 | 0.05 | 14.3 | +10 | 57.96 | 0.25 | 2+ |
| 4017 | Disneya | 10 19.7 | 0.29 | 15.5 | +09 | |||
| 2042 | Sitarski | 10 20.0 | 0.57 | 15.5 | +11 | |||
| 417 | Suevia | 10 21.5 | 0.44 | 13.6 | +09 | 7.034 | 0.06–0.22 | 3 |
| 362 | Havnia | 10 24.7 | 0.34 | 11.9 | +12 | 16.92 | 0.09–0.11 | 3 |
| 3415 | Danby | 10 26.3 | 0.46 | 14.7 | +14 | 5.666 | 0.09–0.18 | 3 |
| 147 | Protogeneia | 10 29.3 | 0.51 | 12.7 | +15 | 7.8528 | 0.25–0.28 | 3 |
| 8579 | Hieizan | 10 29.7 | 0.80 | 15.7 | +12 | |||
| 2369 | Chekhov | 10 29.8 | 0.31 | 15.5 | +13 | |||
| 3403 | Tammy | 10 31.4 | 0.76 | 15.5 | +12 | 11.85 | 0.10 | 1 |
| 797 | Montana | 11 01.1 | 0.92 | 13.8 | +17 | 4.5463 | 0.32–0.50 | 3 |
| 5508 | Gomyou | 11 01.2 | 0.20 | 15.4 | +15 | |||
| 11268 | Spassky | 11 01.4 | 0.95 | 15.2 | +13 | |||
| 257 | Silesia | 11 02.3 | 0.22 | 13.0 | +15 | 15.7095 | 0.29–0.30 | 3 |
| 1704 | Wachmann | 11 04.2 | 0.45 | 15.4 | +16 | 3.314 | 0.40 | 3 |
| 1257 | Mora | 11 04.9 | 0.32 | 15.4 | +15 | 5.2948 | 0.23–0.43 | 3 |
| 3987 | Wujek | 11 07.7 | 0.26 | 15.0 | +16 | |||
| 1128 | Astrid | 11 09.1 | 0.14 | 14.4 | +16 | 10.228 | 0.29 | 2+ |
| 24602 | Mozzhorin | 11 11.0 | 0.74 | 15.2 | +16 | |||
| 936 | Kunigunde | 11 12.1 | 0.26 | 14.4 | +17 | 8.80 | 0.25 | 2 |
| 5401 | Minamioda | 11 13.2 | 0.44 | 14.7 | +19 | |||
| 919 | Ilsebill | 11 13.3 | 0.15 | 14.4 | +18 | 5.0325 | 0.25 | 3 |
| 1421 | Esperanto | 11 13.5 | 0.59 | 14.9 | +20 | 21.982 | 0.15–0.42 | 3− |
| 13165 | 1995 WS1 | 11 14.2 | 0.54 | 15.3 | +19 | |||
| 1151 | Ithaka | 11 15.5 | 0.83 | 14.7 | +17 | 4.9312 | 0.12–0.15 | 3 |
| 5960 | Wakkanai | 11 16.4 | 0.82 | 15.0 | +20 | |||
| 838 | Seraphina | 11 17.0 | 0.67 | 13.4 | +20 | 15.67 | 0.07–0.30 | 2 |
| 28321 | Arnabdey | 11 17.2 | 0.51 | 15.2 | +20 | |||
| 1343 | Nicole | 11 17.7 | 0.79 | 14.5 | +21 | 70. | 0.29 | 1 |
| 2387 | Xi’an | 11 19.5 | 0.38 | 14.9 | +20 | |||
| 6476 | 1987 VT | 11 20.3 | 0.59 | 15.3 | +21 | |||
| 156 | Xanthippe | 11 21.1 | 0.27 | 13.1 | +21 | 22.37 | 0.10–0.12 | 3 |
| 4012 | Geballe | 11 22.0 | 0.49 | 14.7 | +21 | |||
| 26 | Proserpina | 11 22.7 | 0.46 | 11.2 | +21 | 13.110 | 0.08–0.21 | 3 |
| 1540 | Kevola | 11 23.1 | 0.86 | 14.6 | +23 | 20.082 | 0.23 | 3− |
| 4747 | Jujo | 11 23.2 | 0.27 | 15.4 | +20 | |||
| 2197 | Shanghai | 11 24.2 | 0.14 | 15.3 | +21 | 5.99 | 0.16 | 2 |
| 1857 | Parchomenko | 11 24.3 | 0.45 | 13.8 | +20 | 3.1177 | 0.22–0.27 | 3 |
| 243 | Ida | 11 24.7 | 0.63 | 13.5 | +22 | 4.634 | 0.40–0.86 | 3 |
| 640 | Brambilla | 11 24.8 | 0.70 | 13.8 | +18 | 7.768 | 0.25 | 3 |
| 8610 | Goldhaber | 11 25.0 | 0.04 | 15.3 | +21 | |||
| 1545 | Thernoe | 11 25.9 | 0.38 | 14.7 | +22 | 17.20 | 0.76 | 3 |
| 4801 | Ohre | 11 27.4 | 0.20 | 15.4 | +21 | 32.000 | 0.50–0.60 | 3 |
| 1912 | Anubis | 11 27.7 | 0.38 | 15.1 | +20 | |||
| 3249 | Musashino | 11 29.4 | 0.66 | 14.6 | +20 | 4.5527 | 0.55 | 3 |
| 1363 | Herberta | 11 30.0 | 0.30 | 15.1 | +21 | |||
| 1480 | Aunus | 11 30.1 | 0.30 | 14.9 | +22 | |||
| 523 | Ada | 12 01.6 | 0.61 | 12.8 | +23 | 10.03 | 0.52–0.70 | 3 |
| 3606 | Pohjola | 12 01.7 | 0.28 | 14.6 | +22 | |||
| 4323 | Hortulus | 12 01.8 | 0.83 | 15.0 | +23 | 4.7354 | 0.23 | 3− |
| 403 | Cyane | 12 02.1 | 0.46 | 12.3 | +21 | 12.283 | 0.21–0.45 | 3 |
| 220 | Stephania | 12 02.2 | 0.92 | 13.4 | +24 | 18.198 | 0.21–0.45 | 3 |
| 13388 | 1999 AE6 | 12 03.7 | 0.90 | 15.0 | +20 | |||
| 3613 | Kunlun | 12 06.0 | 0.08 | 15.3 | +23 | |||
| 2847 | Parvati | 12 07.5 | 0.29 | 15.3 | +22 | |||
| 268 | Adorea | 12 07.8 | 0.77 | 12.7 | +20 | 7.80 | 0.15–0.20 | 3 |
| 579 | Sidonia | 12 09.0 | 0.58 | 12.1 | +21 | 16.286 | 0.02–0.28 | 3− |
| 6384 | Kervin | 12 09.1 | 0.26 | 15.0 | +22 | 3.6203 | 0.06–0.10 | 3 |
| 395 | Delia | 12 09.2 | 0.13 | 14.4 | +23 | 19.71 | 0.25 | 2 |
| 1576 | Fabiola | 12 09.3 | 0.56 | 14.4 | +21 | 6.7 | 0.2 | 2 |
| 2534 | Houzeau | 12 09.9 | 0.42 | 15.1 | +22 | |||
| 15305 | 1992 WT1 | 12 10.5 | 0.62 | 15.5 | +22 | |||
| 3136 | Anshan | 12 11.1 | 0.12 | 15.5 | +23 | |||
| 2972 | Niilo | 12 11.9 | 0.77 | 15.5 | +21 | |||
| 580 | Selene | 12 13.7 | 0.57 | 14.1 | +21 | 9.47 | 0.27 | 3− |
| 2555 | Thomas | 12 14.3 | 0.23 | 15.3 | +24 | |||
| 2476 | Andersen | 12 14.7 | 0.14 | 15.1 | +23 | |||
| 1498 | Lahti | 12 14.9 | 0.37 | 15.4 | +24 | 58. | 0.8 | 1+ |
| 951 | Gaspra | 12 16.4 | 0.77 | 13.1 | +22 | 7.042 | 0.2 1.0 | 3 |
| 1667 | Pels | 12 16.4 | 0.23 | 14.8 | +24 | 3.268 | 0.20–0.42 | 3 |
| 3115 | Baily | 12 17.3 | 0.88 | 13.3 | +21 | 16.22 | 0.08–0.14 | 2+ |
| 20762 | 2000 EE36 | 12 21.0 | 0.06 | 14.9 | +24 | 8.891 | 0.46 | 3− |
| 1078 | Mentha | 12 21.5 | 0.61 | 13.6 | +22 | 85. | 0.87 | 3 |
| 27 | Euterpe | 12 25.1 | 0.14 | 8.4 | +23 | 10.4082 | 0.13–0.21 | 3 |
| 1306 | Scythia | 12 25.8 | 0.17 | 13.5 | +24 | 7.525 | 0.15–0.25 | 3 |
| 1725 | CrAO | 12 26.7 | 0.67 | 15.3 | +21 | 21.45 | 0.08–0.28 | 3 |
| 2563 | Boyarchuk | 12 27.7 | 0.35 | 15.4 | +22 | 11.04 | 0.11 | 2 |
| 1209 | Pumma | 12 31.3 | 0.43 | 15.5 | +25 | 8.5001 |
Shape/Spin Modeling Opportunities
Those doing work for modeling should contact Josef Ďurech at the email address above. If looking to add lightcurves for objects with existing models, visit the Database of Asteroid Models from Inversion Techniques (DAMIT) web site
An additional dense lightcurve, along with sparse data, could lead to the asteroid being added to or improving one in DAMIT, thus increasing the total number of asteroids with spin axis and shape models.
Included in the list below are objects that:
Are rated U = 3− or 3 in the LCDB
Do not have reported pole in the LCDB Summary table
Have at least three entries in the Details table of the LCDB where the lightcurve is rated U > 2.
The caveat for condition #3 is that no check was made to see if the lightcurves are from the same apparition or if the phase angle bisector longitudes differ significantly from the upcoming apparition. The last check is often not possible because the LCDB does not list the approximate date of observations for all details records. Including that information is an on-going project.
| Brightest | LCDB Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Num | Name | Date | Mag | Dec | Period | Amp | U |
| 1459 | Magnya | 10 01.6 | 13.5 | −13 | 4.678 | 0.57–0.85 | 3 |
| 74 | Galatea | 10 01.8 | 10.6 | +4 | 17.268 | 0.08–0.16 | 3 |
| 3870 | Mayre | 10 02.7 | 15.2 | +8 | 3.9915 | 0.44–0.45 | 3 |
| 215 | Oenone | 10 02.8 | 12.7 | +3 | 27.937 | 0.18–0.20 | 3 |
| 1023 | Thomana | 10 03.0 | 13.5 | +5 | 17.56 | 0.27–0.36 | 3− |
| 2074 | Shoemaker | 10 05.9 | 15.2 | +24 | 2.5328 | 0.06–0.12 | 3 |
| 514 | Armida | 10 06.6 | 13.0 | +10 | 21.851 | 0.16–0.42 | 3 |
| 729 | Watsonia | 10 07.3 | 13.9 | −17 | 25.23 | 0.17–0.30 | 3 |
| 890 | Waltraut | 10 08.5 | 15.2 | −2 | 12.581 | 0.32–0.36 | 3 |
| 266 | Aline | 10 09.6 | 11.9 | +20 | 13.018 | 0.07–0.10 | 3 |
| 586 | Thekla | 10 10.0 | 13.3 | +8 | 13.67 | 0.22–0.30 | 3 |
| 929 | Algunde | 10 10.3 | 14.3 | +10 | 3.3102 | 0.13–0.19 | 3 |
| 2323 | Zverev | 10 11.9 | 15.1 | +8 | 3.921 | 0.36–0.39 | 3 |
| 1967 | Menzel | 10 12.3 | 13.7 | +2 | 2.835 | 0.24–0.39 | 3 |
| 3915 | Fukushima | 10 13.0 | 15.2 | −2 | 9.418 | 0.50–0.79 | 3 |
| 759 | Vinifera | 10 13.3 | 13.9 | +39 | 14.229 | 0.36–0.40 | 3 |
| 66146 | 1998 TU3 | 10 14.2 | 15.5 | +9 | 2.375 | 0.07–0.15 | 3 |
| 855 | Newcombia | 10 14.7 | 14.9 | +9 | 3.003 | 0.33–0.41 | 3 |
| 782 | Montefiore | 10 16.0 | 13.9 | +1 | 4.0728 | 0.42–0.45 | 3 |
| 908 | Buda | 10 19.2 | 14.0 | −10 | 14.572 | 0.09–0.41 | 3 |
| 212 | Medea | 10 20.1 | 12.1 | +16 | 10.283 | 0.04–0.16 | 3 |
| 754 | Malabar | 10 20.1 | 13.6 | −6 | 11.74 | 0.19–0.38 | 3 |
| 947 | Monterosa | 10 20.9 | 11.8 | +6 | 5.164 | 0.15–0.23 | 3− |
| 362 | Havnia | 10 24.7 | 11.9 | +12 | 16.92 | 0.09–0.17 | 3 |
| 4159 | Freeman | 10 25.0 | 14.4 | −10 | 4.4021 | 0.23–0.40 | 3 |
| 3285 | Ruth Wolfe | 10 25.3 | 14.6 | +33 | 3.919 | 0.20 | 3 |
| 3415 | Danby | 10 26.2 | 14.8 | +14 | 5.666 | 0.09–0.18 | 3 |
| 143 | Adria | 10 26.9 | 13.4 | +27 | 22.005 | 0.05–0.10 | 3 |
| 530 | Turandot | 10 27.0 | 13.2 | +1 | 19.96 | 0.10–0.16 | 3− |
| 1093 | Freda | 10 27.2 | 12.9 | −1 | 19.67 | 0.04–0.21 | 3 |
| 380 | Fiducia | 10 29.1 | 12.6 | +5 | 13.69 | 0.04–0.32 | 3 |
| 3873 | Roddy | 10 30.3 | 15.3 | +37 | 2.4782 | 0.05–0.11 | 3 |
| 797 | Montana | 11 01.0 | 13.8 | +17 | 4.5463 | 0.32–0.50 | 3 |
| 785 | Zwetana | 11 03.3 | 13.8 | +5 | 8.8882 | 0.13–0.18 | 3 |
| 1425 | Tuorla | 11 04.7 | 15.1 | +4 | 7.75 | 0.17–0.40 | 3 |
| 1257 | Mora | 11 04.9 | 15.4 | +15 | 5.2948 | 0.23–0.43 | 3 |
| 975 | Perseverantia | 11 05.2 | 13.9 | +16 | 7.267 | 0.14–0.23 | 3 |
| 275 | Sapientia | 11 05.9 | 13.1 | +9 | 14.931 | 0.05–0.12 | 3− |
| 1274 | Delportia | 11 07.5 | 14.9 | +23 | 5.615 | 0.05–0.09 | 3 |
| 1730 | Marceline | 11 08.1 | 14.5 | +3 | 3.837 | 0.94–1.00 | 3 |
| 235 | Carolina | 11 08.9 | 12.9 | +12 | 17.61 | 0.30–0.38 | 3 |
| 3640 | Gostin | 11 10.5 | 14.6 | +24 | 3.2641 | 0.40–0.47 | 3 |
| 2448 | Sholokhov | 11 12.4 | 15.4 | −7 | 10.061 | 0.21–0.63 | 3− |
| 1115 | Sabauda | 11 14.4 | 13.7 | +10 | 6.75 | 0.16–0.27 | 3− |
| 1151 | Ithaka | 11 15.3 | 14.7 | +17 | 4.9311 | 0.12–0.15 | 3 |
| 517 | Edith | 11 16.2 | 12.6 | +22 | 9.2747 | 0.08–0.18 | 3 |
| 1999 | Hirayama | 11 17.3 | 15.4 | +1 | 15.63 | 0.45–0.57 | 3− |
| 6823 | 1988 ED1 | 11 19.7 | 14.9 | +4 | 2.546 | 0.10–0.30 | 3− |
| 156 | Xanthippe | 11 21.1 | 13.1 | +21 | 22.37 | 0.10–0.12 | 3 |
| 11424 | 1999 LZ24 | 11 22.7 | 14.1 | +17 | 2.925 | 0.08 | 3 |
| 240 | Vanadis | 11 24.4 | 11.1 | +17 | 10.64 | 0.30–0.34 | 3 |
| 3682 | Welther | 11 24.7 | 13.7 | +27 | 3.5973 | 0.21–0.35 | 3 |
| 118 | Peitho | 11 25.1 | 11.1 | +24 | 7.8055 | 0.08–0.33 | 3 |
| 698 | Ernestina | 11 25.1 | 14.6 | +27 | 5.0363 | 0.30–0.69 | 3 |
| 504 | Cora | 11 25.9 | 13.2 | +7 | 7.588 | 0.20–0.27 | 3− |
| 1077 | Campanula | 11 27.1 | 14.5 | +31 | 3.8508 | 0.24–0.40 | 3 |
| 4801 | Ohre | 11 27.4 | 15.4 | +21 | 32. | 0.50–0.60 | 3 |
| 3028 | Zhangguoxi | 11 28.1 | 15.1 | +10 | 4.826 | 0.12–0.25 | 3 |
| 1225 | Ariane | 11 30.2 | 14.1 | +26 | 5.5068 | 0.30–0.36 | 3 |
| 689 | Zita | 11 30.9 | 14.3 | +11 | 6.425 | 0.30–0.62 | 3 |
| 1376 | Michelle | 12 01.9 | 15.1 | +16 | 5.9748 | 0.03–0.20 | 3 |
| 2294 | Andronikov | 12 02.1 | 14.9 | +29 | 3.1529 | 0.35–0.42 | 3 |
| 5806 | Archieroy | 12 04.8 | 15.2 | +54 | 12.163 | 0.34–0.47 | 3 |
| 762 | Pulcova | 12 06.3 | 12.6 | +38 | 5.839 | 0.18–0.30 | 3 |
| 6384 | Kervin | 12 09.0 | 15.1 | +22 | 3.6203 | 0.06–0.10 | 3 |
| 348 | May | 12 09.8 | 13.1 | +19 | 7.3812 | 0.14–0.16 | 3 |
| 33342 | 1998 WT24# | 12 10.6 | 11.3 | +2 | 3.697 | 0.25–0.56 | 3 |
| 1864 | Daedalus | 12 10.9 | 15.4 | +52 | 8.572 | 0.85–1.04 | 3 |
| 204 | Kallisto | 12 11.3 | 13.4 | +13 | 19.489 | 0.09–0.26 | 3 |
| 756 | Lilliana | 12 12.3 | 15.1 | +1 | 7.834 | 0.18–0.99 | 3 |
| 1667 | Pels | 12 16.3 | 14.8 | +24 | 3.268 | 0.20–0.42 | 3 |
| 2105 | Gudy | 12 17.7 | 13.3 | +33 | 15.795 | 0.18–0.52 | 3− |
| 888 | Parysatis | 12 18.7 | 12.2 | +8 | 5.9314 | 0.22–0.26 | 3 |
| 1520 | Imatra | 12 20.1 | 14.5 | +18 | 18.635 | 0.27–0.35 | 3− |
| 4254 | Kamel | 12 22.1 | 14.9 | +2 | 2.739 | 0.17–0.19 | 3 |
| 1830 | Pogson | 12 22.9 | 14.6 | +17 | 2.57 | 0.10–0.17 | 3 |
| 1017 | Jacqueline | 12 24.2 | 14.4 | +18 | 7.87 | 0.6–0.72 | 3 |
| 131 | Vala | 12 25.1 | 13.2 | +27 | 5.1812 | 0.09–0.32 | 3 |
| 2004 | Lexell | 12 25.1 | 14.6 | +28 | 5.4429 | 0.42–0.51 | 3 |
| 289 | Nenetta | 12 25.5 | 13.2 | +13 | 6.902 | 0.11–0.19 | 3 |
| 5080 | Oja | 12 26.3 | 14.5 | +34 | 7.222 | 0.31–0.39 | 3 |
| 1505 | Koranna | 12 26.6 | 15.3 | +14 | 4.451 | 0.55–0.70 | 3 |
| 373 | Melusina | 12 27.4 | 13.9 | +45 | 12.97 | 0.20–0.25 | 3 |
| 635 | Vundtia | 12 27.8 | 13.3 | +7 | 11.79 | 0.15–0.27 | 3 |
| 309 | Fraternitas | 12 28.0 | 14.6 | +29 | 22.398 | 0.10–0.13 | 3 |
| 1523 | Pieksamaki | 12 30.3 | 14.5 | +31 | 5.3202 | 0.28–0.47 | 3 |
Radar-Optical Opportunities
There are several resources to help plan observations in support of radar.
Future radar targets:
http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/~lance/future.radar.nea.periods.html
Past radar targets:
http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/~lance/radar.nea.periods.html
Arecibo targets:
http://www.naic.edu/~pradar/sched.shtml
Goldstone targets:
http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroids/goldstone_asteroid_schedule.html
However, these are based on known targets at the time the list was prepared. It is very common for newly discovered objects to move up the list and become radar targets on short notice. We recommend that you keep up with the latest discoveries using the RSS feeds from the Minor Planet Center
In particular, monitor the NEA feed and be flexible with your observing program. In some cases, you may have only 1-3 days when the asteroid is within reach of your equipment. Be sure to keep in touch with the radar team (through Dr. Benner’s email listed above) if you get data. The team may not always be observing the target but, in some cases, your initial results may change their plans. In all cases, your efforts are greatly appreciated.
Use the ephemerides below as a guide to your best chances for observing, but remember that photometry may be possible before and/or after the ephemerides given below. Note that geocentric positions are given. Use these web sites to generate updated and topocentric positions:
MPC: http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html
JPL: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons
In the ephemerides below, ED and SD are, respectively, the Earth and Sun distances (AU), V is the estimated Johnson V magnitude, and α is the phase angle. SE and ME are the great circles distances (in degrees) of the Sun and Moon from the asteroid. MP is the lunar phase and GB is the galactic latitude. “PHA” in the header indicates that the object is a “potentially hazardous asteroid”, meaning that at some (long distant) time, its orbit might take it very close to Earth.
Some of the targets listed here may be carry-overs from the previous quarter’s photometry opportunities article since they are still reachable targets for at least part of the covered quarter-year.
(436724) 2011 UW158 (Oct, H = 19.4, PHA)
This asteroid continues to be an accessible target in early October. It made its closest approach on 2015 July 19 (0.0164 AU) and, at the time this was written in early July, was predicted to be one of the strongest radar target in years. Extensive work by Bruce Gary in 2015 June and July (http://www.brucegary.net/UW158/) found, among other things, a period of 0.610843 ± 0.00005 h (or about 36.651 minutes) with an amplitude of 0.52 mag at a phase angle of 80.5°. The amplitude at low phase angles may be considerably less. Don’t let the existing results dissuade you from obtaining additional data. Observations in October will be at much lower phase angles and so be helpful for modeling the asteroid when combined with existing data.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01 | 23 54.8 | +23 18 | 0.27 | 1.25 | 18.0 | 17.3 | 158 | 48 | −0.87 | −38 |
| 10/02 | 23 54.5 | +22 56 | 0.27 | 1.26 | 18.1 | 16.9 | 159 | 61 | −0.78 | −38 |
| 10/03 | 23 54.3 | +22 33 | 0.28 | 1.26 | 18.1 | 16.7 | 159 | 74 | −0.68 | −38 |
| 10/04 | 23 54.1 | +22 11 | 0.28 | 1.27 | 18.2 | 16.4 | 159 | 86 | −0.57 | −39 |
| 10/05 | 23 53.9 | +21 49 | 0.29 | 1.27 | 18.2 | 16.2 | 159 | 99 | −0.47 | −39 |
| 10/06 | 23 53.7 | +21 28 | 0.29 | 1.28 | 18.2 | 16.1 | 159 | 111 | −0.37 | −39 |
| 10/07 | 23 53.6 | +21 07 | 0.30 | 1.28 | 18.3 | 16.0 | 159 | 122 | −0.28 | −40 |
| 10/08 | 23 53.5 | +20 46 | 0.31 | 1.29 | 18.3 | 16.0 | 159 | 133 | −0.19 | −40 |
3200 Phaethon (Oct-Dec, H = 14.6, PHA)
The period for this NEA is well-known at ~3.604 h. Additional observations will help model the asteroid, including a check on whether YORP (a thermal effect) is causing the spin rotation to speed up or down.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01 | 04 00.6 | +42 16 | 1.66 | 2.31 | 18.6 | 22.4 | 118 | 31 | −0.88 | −8 |
| 10/11 | 03 43.9 | +42 44 | 1.57 | 2.34 | 18.4 | 19.2 | 130 | 111 | −0.03 | −10 |
| 10/21 | 03 21.7 | +42 34 | 1.50 | 2.36 | 18.2 | 15.4 | 141 | 115 | +0.52 | −12 |
| 10/31 | 02 55.8 | +41 33 | 1.46 | 2.38 | 18.0 | 11.6 | 151 | 42 | −0.84 | −16 |
| 11/10 | 02 29.2 | +39 37 | 1.45 | 2.39 | 17.9 | 9.5 | 156 | 148 | −0.03 | −19 |
| 11/20 | 02 05.2 | +36 57 | 1.48 | 2.40 | 18.0 | 10.8 | 153 | 67 | +0.58 | −24 |
| 11/30 | 01 46.1 | +33 56 | 1.54 | 2.40 | 18.2 | 14.1 | 144 | 85 | −0.81 | −28 |
| 12/10 | 01 32.6 | +30 58 | 1.62 | 2.40 | 18.5 | 17.6 | 132 | 143 | −0.02 | −31 |
(163899) 2003 SD220 (Oct-Dec, H = 16.8, PHA)
The rotation period for this NEA is not known. The estimated diameter is 1.2 km, so it is unlikely that the rotation period is < 2h. The very large phase angles could make for some unusually shaped lightcurves due to deep shadowing effects.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01 | 08 58.9 | +49 57 | 0.26 | 0.94 | 17.3 | 96.2 | 69 | 79 | −0.88 | +41 |
| 10/11 | 09 12.0 | +49 03 | 0.25 | 0.96 | 17.0 | 90.6 | 75 | 58 | −0.03 | +43 |
| 10/21 | 09 29.8 | +47 32 | 0.23 | 0.98 | 16.7 | 86.4 | 80 | 143 | +0.52 | +46 |
| 10/31 | 09 50.8 | +45 23 | 0.21 | 1.00 | 16.4 | 83.3 | 84 | 58 | −0.84 | +50 |
| 11/10 | 10 14.7 | +42 23 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 16.1 | 81.3 | 88 | 70 | −0.03 | +55 |
| 11/20 | 10 42.1 | +38 04 | 0.16 | 1.00 | 15.7 | 80.7 | 90 | 149 | +0.58 | +61 |
| 11/30 | 11 14.9 | +31 15 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 15.3 | 82.4 | 90 | 46 | −0.81 | +69 |
| 12/10 | 11 58.3 | +19 22 | 0.10 | 0.98 | 14.9 | 88.5 | 86 | 69 | −0.02 | +76 |
| 12/20 | 13 00.3 | −01 48 | 0.08 | 0.96 | 15.0 | 102.7 | 73 | 177 | +0.66 | +61 |
| 12/30 | 14 30.6 | −28 54 | 0.08 | 0.94 | 16.2 | 121.9 | 54 | 72 | −0.79 | +29 |
(206378) 2003 RB (Oct-Dec, H = 18.7, PHA)
Pravec et al. (2003) reported a period of P > 16 h and amplitude A > 0.2 mag. The low galactic latitudes may make this a difficult target. The long period makes it a good project for a collaboration of observers at significantly different longitudes.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01 | 06 55.7 | +56 58 | 0.18 | 1.01 | 17.9 | 81.2 | 89 | 61 | −0.88 | +23 |
| 10/11 | 07 14.8 | +54 51 | 0.21 | 1.04 | 18.0 | 74.2 | 94 | 76 | −0.03 | +25 |
| 10/21 | 07 22.8 | +53 15 | 0.24 | 1.07 | 18.1 | 66.2 | 101 | 142 | +0.52 | +26 |
| 10/31 | 07 21.1 | +51 58 | 0.26 | 1.11 | 18.1 | 57.3 | 110 | 39 | −0.84 | +25 |
| 11/10 | 07 09.7 | +50 47 | 0.28 | 1.16 | 18.1 | 47.6 | 120 | 103 | −0.03 | +23 |
| 11/20 | 06 49.2 | +49 16 | 0.31 | 1.21 | 18.1 | 37.2 | 132 | 118 | +0.58 | +20 |
| 11/30 | 06 23.3 | +47 03 | 0.33 | 1.27 | 18.0 | 26.7 | 145 | 37 | −0.81 | +15 |
| 12/10 | 05 57.5 | +44 04 | 0.37 | 1.33 | 18.1 | 17.3 | 156 | 142 | −0.02 | +10 |
(413577) 2005 UL5 (Nov, H = 20.0, PHA)
Thomas et al. (2014; Icarus 228, 217-246) report this is a type Sq asteroid. Given this, the estimated size for the NEA is about 270 meters. The low galactic latitudes will make this a challenge.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/10 | 05 51.3 | +03 15 | 0.11 | 1.07 | 17.2 | 40.3 | 135 | 119 | −0.03 | −12 |
| 11/11 | 05 54.9 | +03 04 | 0.10 | 1.07 | 17.0 | 40.7 | 135 | 130 | −0.01 | −11 |
| 11/12 | 05 59.2 | +02 49 | 0.09 | 1.06 | 16.7 | 41.3 | 135 | 140 | +0.00 | −10 |
| 11/13 | 06 04.6 | +02 32 | 0.08 | 1.05 | 16.5 | 42.2 | 135 | 149 | +0.02 | −9 |
| 11/14 | 06 11.6 | +02 10 | 0.07 | 1.04 | 16.2 | 43.4 | 134 | 158 | +0.05 | −8 |
| 11/15 | 06 21.0 | +01 40 | 0.06 | 1.03 | 15.8 | 45.2 | 132 | 162 | +0.11 | −6 |
| 11/16 | 06 34.5 | +00 57 | 0.05 | 1.02 | 15.5 | 48.1 | 130 | 162 | +0.18 | −3 |
| 11/17 | 06 55.1 | −00 08 | 0.04 | 1.01 | 15.1 | 52.7 | 126 | 159 | +0.26 | +1 |
| 11/18 | 07 30.4 | −01 59 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 14.6 | 60.9 | 118 | 156 | +0.36 | +8 |
| 11/19 | 08 38.2 | −05 21 | 0.02 | 0.99 | 14.4 | 77.2 | 102 | 158 | +0.47 | +21 |
| 11/20 | 10 50.1 | −10 15 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 15.2 | 109.0 | 70 | 162 | +0.58 | +42 |
| 11/21 | 13 23.9 | −11 45 | 0.02 | 0.97 | 18.9 | 144.9 | 35 | 147 | +0.69 | +50 |
(33342) 1998 WT24 (Nov-Jan, H = 18.0, PHA)
The period for 1998 WT24 is known to be about 3.698 h. This makes it a potential binary candidate, so higher-precision data are encouraged.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01 | 09 06.6 | −05 59 | 0.19 | 0.97 | 17.4 | 91.1 | 78 | 44 | −0.75 | +26 |
| 11/11 | 08 58.9 | −06 07 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 16.6 | 82.4 | 89 | 83 | −0.01 | +25 |
| 11/21 | 08 43.5 | −06 12 | 0.10 | 1.01 | 15.6 | 72.3 | 102 | 139 | +0.69 | +21 |
| 12/01 | 07 56.9 | −05 26 | 0.06 | 1.02 | 13.8 | 55.5 | 122 | 24 | −0.72 | +12 |
| 12/11 | 04 17.3 | +02 24 | 0.03 | 1.01 | 11.3 | 23.5 | 156 | 163 | +0.00 | −32 |
| 12/21 | 00 01.4 | +09 23 | 0.05 | 0.99 | 14.4 | 81.4 | 96 | 28 | +0.76 | −52 |
| 12/31 | 23 01.3 | +09 41 | 0.10 | 0.96 | 16.5 | 102.2 | 72 | 165 | −0.70 | −45 |
| 01/10 | 22 35.0 | +09 06 | 0.14 | 0.91 | 18.0 | 116.0 | 57 | 56 | +0.00 | −41 |
3122 Florence (Dec-Feb, H = 14.2, PHA)
Here is another potential binary candidate: the rotation period is known to be 2.358 h. Observations throughout the ephemeris period can help establish the H and G parameters. The estimated size is 4.5 km.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01 | 11 16.4 | +15 09 | 1.80 | 1.97 | 18.1 | 29.9 | 84 | 34 | −0.72 | +65 |
| 12/11 | 11 23.3 | +13 52 | 1.72 | 2.01 | 18.1 | 29.2 | 92 | 87 | +0.00 | +66 |
| 12/21 | 11 27.3 | +12 48 | 1.63 | 2.06 | 18.0 | 28.0 | 101 | 137 | +0.76 | +66 |
| 12/31 | 11 28.0 | +11 59 | 1.54 | 2.10 | 17.8 | 26.0 | 111 | 9 | −0.70 | +65 |
| 01/10 | 11 24.9 | +11 25 | 1.46 | 2.14 | 17.7 | 23.1 | 121 | 120 | +0.00 | +64 |
| 01/20 | 11 17.7 | +11 06 | 1.39 | 2.18 | 17.5 | 19.3 | 133 | 98 | +0.82 | +63 |
| 01/30 | 11 06.4 | +11 00 | 1.33 | 2.22 | 17.3 | 14.6 | 146 | 33 | −0.70 | +61 |
| 02/09 | 10 51.7 | +11 02 | 1.30 | 2.25 | 17.0 | 9.0 | 159 | 164 | +0.00 | +58 |
(294739) 2008 CM (Dec-Jan, H = 17.1, PHA)
Warner (2014, MPB 41, 157-168) found a period of 3.054 h. The amplitude was 0.48 mag at a phase angle α = 70°, about the same as during the first few days of the ephemeris below.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/20 | 14 35.0 | +55 09 | 0.12 | 0.99 | 15.7 | 84.0 | 89 | 117 | +0.66 | +56 |
| 12/25 | 12 11.8 | +50 15 | 0.08 | 1.01 | 14.1 | 68.1 | 108 | 80 | +1.00 | +66 |
| 12/30 | 09 06.6 | +15 09 | 0.06 | 1.03 | 12.7 | 34.9 | 143 | 18 | −0.79 | +37 |
| 01/04 | 07 32.4 | −16 45 | 0.09 | 1.06 | 13.8 | 37.3 | 139 | 95 | −0.34 | +1 |
| 01/09 | 06 50.8 | −28 03 | 0.15 | 1.08 | 15.0 | 44.7 | 129 | 133 | −0.01 | −12 |
| 01/14 | 06 29.6 | −32 30 | 0.20 | 1.11 | 15.9 | 47.7 | 124 | 106 | +0.19 | −18 |
| 01/19 | 06 17.6 | −34 29 | 0.26 | 1.14 | 16.5 | 48.7 | 120 | 63 | +0.72 | −21 |
| 01/24 | 06 10.8 | −35 20 | 0.32 | 1.17 | 17.0 | 48.8 | 117 | 59 | +1.00 | −23 |
1994 AW1 (Dec-Jan, H = 17.0, PHA)
This is a known binary (Pravec and Hahn, 1997; Icarus 127, 431-440). The primary rotation period is 2.519 h. The orbital period the satellite is 22.3 h, making it difficult for a single station to cover mutual events (occultations and/or eclipses), if viewing geometry allows, thoroughly. This would be a good project for a group of observers who are widely separated in longitude.
| DATE | RA | Dec | ED | SD | V | α | SE | ME | MP | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01 | 20 49.8 | +62 58 | 0.36 | 1.10 | 17.8 | 62.0 | 99 | 103 | −0.72 | +12 |
| 12/06 | 21 30.4 | +62 30 | 0.35 | 1.11 | 17.7 | 60.6 | 101 | 111 | −0.26 | +8 |
| 12/11 | 22 14.4 | +61 22 | 0.34 | 1.12 | 17.6 | 59.1 | 104 | 101 | +0.00 | +4 |
| 12/16 | 22 59.6 | +59 21 | 0.33 | 1.12 | 17.5 | 57.5 | 106 | 74 | +0.22 | +0 |
| 12/21 | 23 43.5 | +56 25 | 0.33 | 1.13 | 17.5 | 56.1 | 108 | 54 | +0.76 | −5 |
| 12/26 | 00 24.0 | +52 37 | 0.32 | 1.13 | 17.4 | 54.8 | 110 | 79 | −0.99 | −10 |
| 12/31 | 01 00.1 | +48 08 | 0.32 | 1.14 | 17.4 | 53.9 | 111 | 121 | −0.70 | −15 |
| 01/05 | 01 31.8 | +43 14 | 0.33 | 1.14 | 17.5 | 53.4 | 111 | 145 | −0.25 | −19 |
Contributor Information
Brian D. Warner, Center for Solar System Studies / MoreData!, 446 Sycamore Ave., Eaton, CO 80615 USA
Alan W. Harris, MoreData!, La Cañada, CA 91011-3364 USA
Josef Ďurech, Astronomical Institute, Charles University in Prague, 18000 Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC.
Lance A.M. Benner, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109-8099 USA
References
- Harris AW; Young JW; Contreiras L; Dockweiler T; Belkora L; Salo H; Harris WD; Bowell E; Poutanen M; Binzel RP; Tholen DJ; Wang S (1989) “Phase relations of high albedo asteroids: The unusual opposition brightening of 44 Nysa and 64 Angelina.“ Icarus 81, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
- Pravec P; Wolf M; Sarounova L (2003) http://www.asu.cas.cz/~ppravec/neo.htm
- Pravec P; Hahn G (1997) “Two-Period Lightcurve of 1994 AW 1: Indication of a Binary Asteroid?.“ Icarus 127, 431–440. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas CA; Emery JP; Trilling DE; Delbó M; Hora JL; Mueller M (2014) “Physical characterization of Warm Spitzer-observed near-Earth objects.“ Icarus 228, 217–246. [Google Scholar]
- Warner BD, Harris AW, Pravec P (2009) “The Asteroid Lightcurve Database.“ Icarus 202, 134–146 Updated 2015 June. http://www.minorplanet.info/lightcurvedatabase.html [Google Scholar]
- Warner BD (2014) “Near-Earth Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at CS3-Palmer Divide Station: 2014 January-March.“ Minor Planet Bull. 41, 157–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
