Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 May 23;79:125–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.058

Letter to editor - Can universal masking help with our recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic?

Cho-Hung Chiang 1, Cho-Hsien Chiang 2, Cho-Han Chiang 3,
PMCID: PMC7244426  PMID: 32450263

To the editor:

We read with great interest the review conducted by Nicola et al., which summarised the socio-economic impact of social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Policies such as lockdowns, home quarantines, and travel restrictions have been shown to be effective in reducing the transmission of COVID-19 [2,3]. However, as demonstrated by Nicola et al., these restrictive measures are not sustainable solutions in the long run. Businesses were shut down, jobs were lost, and schools were closed. In many parts of the world, the economy has plummeted to a historic low and urgently needs to re-open. However, relaxation of lockdown and social distancing strategies without complementary measures may risk a second wave of COVID-19 infection [4].

Universal masking may be a feasible complementary, non-pharmaceutical measure to re-open the economy yet keep the Coronavirus under control. Even though there have been scanty evidence from clinical trials showing the effectiveness of mask in reducing the spread of COVID-19 in the community, epidemiological evidence seems to support the widespread use of mask. Taiwan and Hong Kong both adopted community-wide masking early in the pandemic. Without resorting to lockdowns and restrictive social distancing measures, they maintained low rates of COVID-19 infections throughout the pandemic (19 and 141 per million population respectively, as of 17 May). Their infection rates are significantly lower compared with other countries that did not adopt this practice [5]. The US and the UK, which did not recommend mask wearing until April, have infection rates of 4594 and 3603 per million population, respectively. Even Singapore, which was widely recognized to have good control over the pandemic, experienced a surge of cases in early April and was forced into a nationwide lockdown [6]. It did not recommend the use of mask in the general population until then.

An illustration of how universal masking, when combined with other measures, can help open the economy while keeping the Coronavirus in check is South Korea. The country experienced a surge of cases in February that was related to religious mass gatherings, in which participants did not wear masks. Other than implementing temporary workplace and school closures, the Korean government employed large-scale testing, isolation and contact tracing, and recommended wearing masks in public [7]. The number of cases quickly stabilized. South Korea had just 214 per million population cases, as of 17 May, despite having numerous clustered outbreaks. The country did not implement nationwide lockdowns throughout the entire pandemic.

There have been several arguments against universal masking. For example, there are concerns that people do not wear mask correctly, which may increase the odds of infection. Another argument is that universal masking may limit the amount available to healthcare workers. However, improper wearing of mask can be overcome through educating the correct technique of mask wearing. Similarly, the limited supply of mask can be solved through a combination of increasing mask production and rationing of mask [8].

The WHO emphasized that all countries must strike a balance between protecting health, preventing economic and social disruption, and respecting human rights. When implemented early and combined with other coordinated control measures, universal masking in East Asia provided a feasible solution to keep infection rates low and the economy open. These approaches are in contrast to restrictive social distancing policies that have forced the economy into recession in many parts of the world. It is time to consider universal masking as we re-open our economy and continue the battle against COVID-19.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Research registration Unique Identifying number (UIN)

Name of the registry:

Unique Identifying number or registration ID:

Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked).

Author contribution

Cho-Hung Chiang: data collection, data analysis, writing - original draft, review & editing.

Cho-Hsien Chiang: data collection and data analysis.

Cho-Han Chiang: Conceptualization, data analysis, writing - original draft, review & editing.

Guarantor

Cho-Han Chiang.

Sources of funding

No funding.

Disclosures

No competing interests.

Provenance and peer review

Not Commissioned, internally reviewed.

Data statement

All data are from open access sources and can be shared on request.

Declaration of competing interest

There are no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Nicola M., Alsafi Z., Sohrabi C. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: a review [published online ahead of print, 2020 apr 16] Int. J. Surg. 2020;S1743–9191(20) doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018. 30316-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pan A., Liu L., Wang C. Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in wuhan, China. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 10 Apr. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Henrik Sjödin, Wilder-Smith Annelies, Sarah Osman, Farooq Zia, Joacim Rocklöv. Only strict quarantine measures can curb the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy, 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(13) doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.13.2000280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leung K., Wu J.T., Liu D., Leung G.M. First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment. Lancet. 2020;395(10233):1382–1393. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30746-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng V.C.C., Wong S.C., Chuang V.W.M. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 23] J. Infect. 2020;S0163–4453(20):30235–30238. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.CHa Chiang, CHu Chiang, Chiang CHs, Chen Y.C. The practice of wearing surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020 Aug doi: 10.3201/eid2608.201498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shim E., Tariq A., Choi W., Lee Y., Chowell G. Transmission potential and severity of COVID-19 in South Korea. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;93:339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chiang C.H., Chiang C.H., Chiang C.H. Maintaining stockpiles of mask in the COVID-19 pandemic: taiwan as a learning model. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020:1–6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery (London, England) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES