Telemedicine, which literally means “healing at a distance”, is a constantly evolving method to deliver care in a remote fashion using information and communication technologies (ICTs) [1]. The rapid advancement and availability of ICTs along with the expansion of internet access to the general public through smartphones as well as portable (i.e. tablet and laptop computers) and desktop computers have served as a potent driving force for telemedicine development in recent years [2]. Advantages of telemedicine are indisputable, particularly with regard of its potential to increase access to health care service overcoming geographical barriers. Of note, in spite of its advantages, until this year the growth of telemedicine services has been somewhat less impressive than expected due to several reasons including cultural barriers, the need of proper regulations, insurance coverage, confidentiality and other issues [2]. However, the ongoing outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) have dramatically changed the scene and accelerated the widespread use of remote care approaches (i.e. telephone- and video-based consultations) in order to avoid in-person visits and prevent the spread of infection [3]. In addition, many regulatory institutions over the world are promoting the use of telemedicine by lifting restrictions on visit reimbursement as well as by facilitating electronic prescriptions [3], [4]. Proper evaluation of this ongoing massive implementation of remote care once the crisis passes will provide quality metrics and will be informative of effectiveness and acceptance of telemedicine programs. If positive, these data will likely revamp this type of care worldwide.
In the field of liver diseases, there have been successful experiences with the use of different modalities of telemedicine [i.e. asynchronous telemedicine (analysis of patient's data by a single physician or multidisciplinary team), synchronous real-time patient management and tele-education] with the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project being the more notable [5]. Created at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center to guide treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients in rural and underserved areas, the ECHO project undertook the task of guiding primary care providers in delivering complex drug treatments to HCV patients through weekly videoconferences with specialists that allowed discussion and design of therapeutic plans. The program showed successful results as the sustained virologic responses achieved by those patients treated in primary care settings under the guidance of ECHO were similar to those observed when patients were treated by specialists [6]. Since then, the ECHO project expanded to many states in the U.S. as well as in many other countries and was also adopted by other medical specialties [7], [8]. Currently, this type of care is considered a vital tool for the goal of global elimination of HCV infection [9].
In addition to HCV management, telemedicine offers opportunities for a better management of patients with chronic liver diseases by increasing their access to tertiary care, thus improving efficiency of healthcare delivery at reasonable cost [9]. Indeed, expansion of telemedicine into other areas of hepatology is desirable and hold potential for improving management of pre- and post-liver transplant patients, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and patients with both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis [10], [11], [12]. In the liver transplant setting existing data suggest that use of telemedicine may expedite evaluation and listing of patients referred to liver transplant centers [13] and could improve outcomes (hospital readmissions, and quality of life) after liver transplantation [10]. In the case of HCC, telemedicine offers the possibility of multidisciplinary evaluation in virtual tumor boards leading to tailored and more effective treatments [9]. Finally, in cirrhosis, telemedicine may enhance self-care and facilitate HCC surveillance eventually preventing readmissions in recently hospitalized patients [11], [14].
The current COVID-19 pandemic has forced the implementation of telemedicine actions for many liver patients. Major international societies have released recommendations encouraging the use of remote care to manage patients with all liver diseases, particularly liver transplant patients [15], [16]. However, the crisis will seriously impact cirrhosis care with social distancing and isolation causing major delays in elective procedures and routine care with potential overwhelm of medical centers managing postponed and potentially decompensated patients in the upcoming months [17]. In this context, developing robust telemedicine programs and revamping remote care initiatives in hepatology will be critical. The next challenge will be how to integrate telemedicine into routine clinical care beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded, in part, by grants from the Fondo Nacional De Ciencia y Tecnología de Chile (FONDECYT #1191145 to M.A.) and the Comisión Nacional de Investigación, Ciencia y Tecnología (CONICYT, basal project PFB 12/2007 CARE Chile UC).
References
- 1.Organization W.H. 2020. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. [accessed May 2020] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim T., Zuckerman J.E. Realizing the potential of telemedicine in global health. J Glob Health. 2019;9:020307. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Contreras C.M., Metzger G.A., Beane J.D., Dedhia P.H., Ejaz A., Pawlik T.M. Telemedicine: patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04623-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Serper M., Cubell A.W., Deleener M.E., Casher T.K., Rosenberg D.J., Whitebloom D. Telemedicine in liver disease and beyond: can the COVID-19 crisis lead to action? Hepatology. 2020 doi: 10.1002/hep.31276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arora S., Kalishman S., Thornton K., Dion D., Murata G., Deming P. Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment—Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology. 2010;52:1124–1133. doi: 10.1002/hep.23802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arora S., Thornton K., Murata G., Deming P., Kalishman S., Dion D. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2199–2207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arora S., Geppert C.M., Kalishman S., Dion D., Pullara F., Bjeletich B. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: Project ECHO. Acad Med. 2007;82:154–160. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318028f68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Komaromy M., Bartlett J., Zurawski A., Gonzales-van Horn S.R, Kalishman S.G., Ceballos V. ECHO care: providing multidisciplinary specialty expertise to support the care of complex patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:326–330. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05205-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Piao C., Terrault N.A., Sarkar S. Telemedicine: an evolving field in hepatology. Hepatol Commun. 2019;3:716–721. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee T.C., Kaiser T.E., Alloway R., Woodle E.S., Edwards M.J., Shah S.A. Telemedicine based remote home monitoring after liver transplantation: results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2019;270:564–572. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stotts M.J., Grischkan J.A., Khungar V. Improving cirrhosis care: the potential for telemedicine and mobile health technologies. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:3849–3856. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i29.3849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Serper M., Volk M.L. Current and future applications of telemedicine to optimize the delivery of care in chronic liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.004. 157–161.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.John B.V., Love E., Dahman B., Kurbanova N., Konjeti V.R., Sundaram L.T. Use of telehealth expedites evaluation and listing of patients referred for liver transplantation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rosenblatt R., Yeh J., Gaglio P.J. Long-term management: modern measures to prevent readmission in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Clin Liver Dis. 2020;24:277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2020.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fix O.K., Hameed B., Fontana R.J., Kwok R.M., McGuire B.M., Mulligan D.C. Clinical best practice advice for hepatology and liver transplant providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: AASLD expert panel consensus statement. Hepatology. 2020 doi: 10.1002/hep.31281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boettler T., Newsome P.N., Mondelli M.U., Maticic M., Cordero E., Cornberg M. Care of patients with liver disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: EASL-ESCMID position paper. JHEP Rep. 2020;2:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tapper E.B., Asrani S.K. The COVID-19 pandemic will have a long-lasting impact on the quality of cirrhosis care. J Hepatol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]