Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2020 Jan-Mar;15(1):11–21.

Design, Construction and Immunogenicity Assessment of pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 (Fusion) as a DNA Vaccine Candidate against Leishmania major Infection in BALB/c Mice

Abdolhossein DALIMI 1,*, Vahid NASIRI 2
PMCID: PMC7244835  PMID: 32489371

Abstract

Background:

KMP-11 (Kinetoplastid membrane protein-Π) exists in all species of kinetoplastid family. It is fully conserved and the protein produced by this gene can induce a very high cellular immune response. We aimed to design a suitable construction for a Leishmania major DNA vaccine and evaluate the protective efficacy of it as a candidate for DNA vaccine against cutaneous leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice.

Methods:

This experimental study was conducted in Tehran City, Iran, between April 20, 2015 and May 30, 2016. KMP-11 gene of L. major (MRHO/IR/75/ER, Iranian strain) and NT-GP96 of Xenopus GP96 DNA from a pBluescript-GP96 plasmid were amplified by PCR and the purified PCR products were cloned into the pJET1.2/blunt plasmid vector, then, subcloned into pEGFP-N1 plasmid as an expression vector. Finally, the KMP-11 gene was fused with GP96 and afterward the combination cloned in pEGFP-N1. All the cloned genes confirmed by enzyme digestions. Then, four groups of mice were immunized with PBS, pEGFP-N1, pEGFP-N1-KMP, and pEGFP-N1-fusion. Four weeks after immunization, all animals were challenged with L. major virulent promastigotes.

Results:

The constructed fusion potentially showed an ability to elicit Th1 responses that led to cutaneous lesion healing. Interestingly, the group received KMP11-GP96 –GFP showed the highest ratio of IFN- γ /IL-4 and IgG2a/IgG1 compare to other groups. No side effect was observed after using the fusion in the mice.

Conclusion:

The constructed fusion could well stimulate both the cellular and humoral immune systems that led to cutaneous lesion healing in mice.

Keywords: Leishmania major, Fusion gene, Vaccine

Introduction

Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease that causes human infections varying from self-healing cutaneous lesions to mucosal diffuse cutaneous and visceral forms. Antimonial resistance is a major problem that we faced in controlling the disease in Iran. Considering the increasing of clinical drug resistance (1), introducing a new effective antigen for producing an anti-leishmanial vaccine seems crucial for preventing the disease in endemic areas.

Several antigens of Leishmania major that generate appropriate immune responses have been cloned and evaluated in vitro and in the L. major infected BALB/c mice model. These antigens were such as gp63 (2), Hsp70 (3), TSA (4), PSA-2 (5), Histone H1 (6), LACK (7, 8), LACK and TSA (9), LeIF (10), LeIF and TSA (11), LeIF, LACK and TSA (12), LACK-TSA fusion (13).

Kinetoplastid Membrane Protein 11 (KMP-11) is a complex protein strongly associated with lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania promastigotes (14). The lipophosphoglycan is highly antigenic for human and murine T cells (15). This is due to the presence of 11-kDa protein in the protozoan membrane. Among various Leishmania molecules known as potential candidate antigens for second-generation vaccines, KMP-11 has concerned much attention because of highly antigenicity for murine, canine and human T cells (16).

GP96 is a member of the HSP90 family and plays an important role in innate and adaptive immune responses, protein folding and assembly (17). GP96 can cause pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, such as IL-12 and GM-CSF, and maturation of APCs (18). Previously, the GP96 N-terminal domain has a potent adjuvant activity toward the surface antigen of hepatitis B (19). Protective DNA vaccination has been performed using proteins fusion to the GP96 peptide against Listeria monocytogenes in the mice.

The main aim of the present study was to design the pEGFP-N1- KMP 11-NTGP96 Fusion construction to use it as a L. major DNA vaccine.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This research was carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Tarbiat Modares University. All animal experiments, including maintenance, handling and blood collection was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee of Tarbiat Modares University based on the Specific National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research issued by the Research and Technology Deputy of Ministry of Health and Medicinal Education of Iran.

Design

This experimental study conducted in Tehran City, Iran, between April 20, 2015 and May 30, 2016. The design, construction and immunogenicity assessment of pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 (Fusion) is shown in a flow chart (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Open in a new tab

The design, construction and immunogenicity assessment of pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 (Fusion) in a flow chart

Parasite and plasmids

The Iranian strain of L. major (MRHO/IR/75/ER) was kindly provided by Razi vaccine and serum research institute, Iran. Promastigotes were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS (Fetal Calf Serum, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and incubated at 24 ± 1 °C. A pBluescript-GP96 plasmid containing the Xenopus GP96 DNA (accession number AY187545, 2552 bp) was kindly provided by Dr. Bolhassani (Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran). Escherichia coli (E.coli) strains TOP10 were received from Novagene Co.,pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector and pEGFP-N1expression vector was obtained from Fermentas and Invitrogen Co., respectively.

Genomic DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA of L. major promastigotes was extracted by commercial DNA Extraction kit (Bioneer, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Qualityand purity of extracting DNA were assessed by electrophoresis on the 1% agarose gel and spectrophotometerically.

Primer design and PCR amplification KMP-11

A pair of oligonucleotide primers were designed based on the KMP-11 gene sequences (accession number KF150697, 279 base pair) according to previous researches (20) as follows:

Forward primer: 5′-AGA TCT ACC ATG GCC ACC ACG TAC GAG GAG-3′ that ACC ATG: Kozak sequence and AGA TCT: Bgl II cut site. Reverse primer: 5′-GAA TTC CTT GGA TGG GTA CTG CGC AGC-3′ that GAA TTC: EcoRI cut site and primers without stop codon.

The PCR amplification with Pfu DNA polymerase (Vivantis) and DNA of L. major was done according to: 95 °C for 3 min as initial denaturation, 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 sec, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 30 sec and then 72 °C for 10 min as final extension.

NT-GP96

The forward and reverse primers for amplifying the NT-GP96 of Xenopus GP96 DNA (accession number AY187545, 1014 base pair) were designed as follows:

  • Forward primer: 5′-CGG GAA TTC GAA GAT GAC GTT GAA -3′ that GAA TTC: EcoRI cut site.

  • Reverse primer: 5′-AT GGT ACC TTT GTA GAA GGC TTT GTA-3′ that GGT ACC: KpnI cut site.

The following program was used for PCR amplification of NT-GP96 with using pBluescript-GP96 plasmid and Pfu DNA polymerase (Vivantis): 95 °C for 5 min as initial denaturation, 30 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 62 °C for 2 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min and then 72 °C for 20 min as final extension.

Finally, the PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel. The KMP-11and NT-GP96 PCR products bands were cut under long (312) UV wavelength and were purified from gel by using a gel purification kit (Bioneer, Korea). Correct insertion confirmed by PCR, restriction enzymes digestion and sending to the Gen Fanavaran ® Company (Iran, Tehran) for sequencing.

Cloning of KMP-11and NT-GP96 inpJET1.2/bluntcloning vector

The purified gene fragment of KMP-11 and NT-GP96 was ligated into pJET1.2 cloning vector at 22 °C for an hour and then at 4 °C overnight with T4 DNA ligase (Fermentas Co.). The ligation products were transformed into E. coli TOP10 strain competent cells and dispersed onto LB agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, colonies on the agar plate that contained recombinant plasmids were detected. For confirmation, PCR amplifications were performed in these colonies using primers specific for KMP-11and NT-GP96 genes and colonies containing the recombinant plasmid were selected. Recombinant plasmids were extracted by Vivantis plasmid extraction kit and digested by Bgl II / EcoRI (for KMP-11), EcoRI / KpnI (for NT-GP96) restriction enzymes (Fermentas Co. ®) for digestion confirmation.

Subcloning of KMP-11and NT-GP96 in pEGFP-N1expression vector

pJET- KMP-11, pJET- NT-GP96 and pEGFP-N1 were digested by Bgl II / EcoRI (for KMP-11), EcoRI / KpnI (for NT-GP96) restriction enzymes and the purified gene fragment of KMP-11and NT-GP96 KMP-11 ligated into digested pEGFPN1expression vector by using of T4 DNA ligase enzyme. Recombinant plasmids pEGFP-KMP-11 and pEGFP -NT-GP96 were transformed into E. coli TOP10 strain competent cells and dispersed onto LB agar plates containing 100 μg/ml of Kanamycin at 37 °C for overnight. Afterward, PCR amplifications were performed in colonies on the agar plate using specific primers of KMP-11and NT-GP96 genes and colonies containing the recombinant plasmid were selected. Then, recombinant plasmids were extracted by Vivantis plasmid extraction kit and digested by Bgl II / EcoRI (for KMP-11), EcoRI / KpnI (for NT-GP96) restriction enzymes (Fermentas Co.).

Design the pEGFP-N1 - KMP 11 -NTGP96 Fusion construct

The recombinant plasmids pEGFP-N1 - KMP 11 and pJET-NT-GP96 were digested by EcoRI and KpnI restriction enzymes. The products of digestion were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gel and the digested bands of NT-GP96 fragment (1014 bp) and pEGFP-N1-KMP 11 were purified by gel purification kit (Vivantis Co.). NT-GP96 genes ligated into digested pEGFP-N1-KMP 11 by using of T4 DNA ligase enzyme. Recombinant plasmids pEGFP-N1-KMP11-NTGP96 were transformed into E.coli TOP10 strain competent cells and dispersed onto LB agar plates containing 100 μg/ml of Kanamycin at 37 °C for overnight. Then, colonies on the agar plate that contained recombinant plasmids were detected. For confirmation, PCR amplifications were performed in these colonies using primers specific for KMP-11and NT-GP96 genes and colonies containing the recombinant plasmid were selected. Recombinant plasmids were extracted by Vivantis plasmid extraction kit and digested by Bgl II / EcoRI (for KMP-11), EcoRI / KpnI (for NT-GP96) and NheI / KpnI (for KMP 11-NTGP96 fusion) restriction enzymes (Fermentas Co.®) for digestion confirmation.

Protein expression, and verification of protein expression in eukaryotic cells

Previously (40), KMP11-NTGP96 -GFP Fusion were Subclonned in pLEXSY-neo Leishmania expression vector, and recobbinant constructs were transfected into L. tarentolae promastigotes as eukaryotic cell, that production of recombinant protein of KMP11-NTGP96 -GFP gene was confirmed by SDS–PAGE and Western Blotting.

Mice, Immunization Schedules

Female inbred BALB/c mice, 6-week-old were purchased from Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. They were housed in clean cages and fed ad libitum. The immunization experiments were carried out in four groups of mice (n= 15 at each group) and all tests were done in triplicate. The first group received PBS only and Group 2 immunized with pEGFP-N1; group 3 vaccinated with pEGFP-N1-KMP11; group 4 vaccinated with pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 (FUSION). All groups were immunized with 100μg of the materials three times (0, 21, 42 d) in the quadriceps muscle. Four weeks after last immunization, all animals were challenged with 2×10 6 stationary phase of Leishmania major (MRHO/IR/75/ER) virulent promastigotes by intradermal inoculation in the tail. Cutaneous lesion size was measured by digital vernier caliper every day until 30 wk after challenge.

After 30 wk, with full respect to the principles of medical ethics, all live mice initially anesthetized with halothane as an inhalant anesthetics euthanasia, in a chemical fume hood. Then the animals sacrificed, and their liver, bone marrow and spleen were studied for the presence of the Leishmania by smear preparation and cultivation in the culture medium.

Cytokine Assays

To determine the levels of IFN- γ and IL-4, in each group of experiment five mice were sacrificed before and 4 wk after challenge and spleen of them were removed and homogenized in PBS. After erythrocytes lysis using ACK lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3 and 0.1 mM Na2-EDTA), splenocytes were washed with PBS and resuspended in RPMI-10% FCS. Cells were then seeded at a density of 3.5×10 6 cells/ml in the presence of L. tarentolae-KMP11-NTGP96 -GFP Freeze/Thawed (25 mg/ml) that were designed and constructed in previous research (20). Concanavalin A (Con A; 5 mg/ml) and medium alone were used as the positive and the negative control respectively. Plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere for IFN- γ and IL-4 measurement. The IFN- γ and IL-4 production in supernatants of splenocytes cultures was measured by ELISA kits (U-CyTech, Netherlands), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All experiments were run in triplicates.

Determination of Antibody response

Before challenge and 4 wk after that, all groups of mice were bled retro-orbitally and the levels of IgG1 and IgG2a Abs were evaluated using ELISA method according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Mouse IgG2a&1 detection kit, eBioscience, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Statistics were performed using SPSS ver. 18 (Chicago, IL, USA) and one way ANOVA (Multiple-comparison Tukey post Hoc test) and Student’s t-test was employed to assess the significance of the differences between the mean values of control and experimental groups. Differences were considered statistically significant when P<0.05. Data shown represent the mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of three independent experiments.

Results

Fusion construct

Following PCR amplification a 279 bp DNA fragment for KMP-11 and 1014 bp for NT-GP96 was identified by agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products (Figs. 2–4). The PCR products were ligated into a pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector and transformed into E. coli TOP10 strain. Bacterial colonies containing the recombinant pJET- KMP-11 and pJET-NT-GP96 plasmids were confirmed by PCR using KMP-11, NT-GP96 and pJET1.2/blunt specific primers. Subsequently, KMP-11 and NT-GP96 genes were successfully subcloned into pEGFPN1expression vectors and transformed into E. coli TOP10 strain. The presence of the inserted genes was confirmed by PCR, using specific primers for them. The extracted pEGFPN1-KMP11 plasmids successfully digested with Bgl II and EcoRI enzymes that after analyzing on 1.2 %(w/v) agarose gel showed a 279 bp fragment (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Open in a new tab

Electrophoresis of the amplified KMP-11 gene of L.major on 1.2 % (w/v) agarose gel. Lane 1: single expanded band of KMP-11 gene (approximately 279 bp); Lane 2:100 bp DNA ladder

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

Open in a new tab

Analysis of enzymatic digestion of pEGFP-N1-KMP11 on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel. Lane 1: 100 bp Plus DNA ladder. Lane 2: Double digestion of GFP-KMP11 with Bgl II and EcoRI (279)

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Open in a new tab

Electrophoresis of the amplified KMP11 of L.major, NT-GP96 and Fusion genes on 1.2 % (w/v) agarose gel. Lane 1: KMP11 gene; Lane 2: single expanded band of NT-GP96 gene (approximately 1014 bp); Lane 3: Fusion; Lane 4: Negative control; Lane5: 1kb DNA ladder

NT-GP96 genes ligated into pEGFP-N1-KMP11 and recombinant plasmid pEGFPN1- KMP11-NTGP96 was transformed into E. coli TOP10 strain. The presence of the inserted construct was confirmed by PCR amplifications using primers specific for KMP-11, NT-GP96 and KMP11-NTGP96 fusion genes (Fig. 5). Recombinant plasmids successfully digested by Bgl II / EcoRI (for KMP-11), EcoRI / KpnI (for NT-GP96) and NheI/KpnI (for KMP11-NTGP96 fusion) restriction enzymes for digestion confirmation.

Fig. 5:

Fig. 5:

Open in a new tab

Electrophoresis of the amplified KMP-11, NT-GP96 and KMP11-NTGP96 fusion genes in PCR reaction with using recombinant plasmid pEGFP-N1- KMP11-NTGP96 as the template and genes specific primers that Lane1: 100bp DNA ladder; Lanes 2, 3, 4: expanded bands of KMP-11, NT-GP96 and KMP11-NTGP96 fusion genes (approximately 279 bp, 1014 bp and 1293 bp respectively)

The IFN- γ /IL-4 ratio

The levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 production were analyzed before and 4 weeks after challenge in the supernatant of the spleen cells culture of all four groups following stimulation with Freeze/Thawed L. tarentolae-KMP11-NTGP96 -GFP. Stimulation of isolated splenocytes from the vaccinated group with recombinant plasmid pEGFP-N1- KMP11-NTGP96 prior and 4 wk after challenge elicited a significantly higher IFN-γ production than other groups (P<0.05) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6:

Fig. 6:

Open in a new tab

IFN- γ /IL-4 ratio in different groups before and after challenge with L. major. The IFN- γ /IL-4 ratio in response to KMP11-NTGP96 -pEGFP and PBS compared (*P< 0.05)

The calculation of the IFN- γ to IL-4 ratio for each vaccinated group were used as an indicator of potential immunization. The Leishmania specific IFN- γ /IL-4 ratio was higher in the pEGFP-N1- KMP11-NTGP96 vaccinated group compared to the others both at before and 4 wk after challenge.

IgG antibody isotypes response to Immunization and challenge

To compare IgG isotypes in different groups, all sera were assayed by ELISA before and 4 wk after immunization. The ratio of IgG2a/IgG1 was highest in the pEGFP-N1- KMP11-NTGP96 vaccinated group that the differences were significant as compared with all other groups (P<0.05)(Fig. 7) .

Fig. 7:

Fig. 7:

Open in a new tab

Optical density ratio of serum antibodies (IgG2a/IgG1) from BALB/c before and after challenge with L. major. Bars represent the mean+ standard error of the mean (SEM) of optical density values of 15 mice

Mortality rate of immunized and control mice after challenge

The mortality rate in the vaccinated group was significantly less than the control groups (P<0.05). In the groups immunized with pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 and pEGFP-N1- KMP11 the survival rates were higher compared to control groups (P< 0.05) (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8:

Fig. 8:

Open in a new tab

Mortality rates of immunized BALB/c mice after challenge with 2×10 6 promastigotesof L.major 30 weeks after the last immunizatio

Only 20% of the mice that received pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 or pEGFP-N1- KMP11 dead during 30 wk after challenge where 100% of control groups dead within 27 wk. After 30 wk, no parasite was isolated from liver, bone marrow and spleen of the live mice. No side effect was observed after using the fusion in the live mice.

Lesion size in immunized and control groups mice

Lesions with a mean size of 1.5 mm were observed at three weeks after challenge in the control groups; while, the mean size of observed lesions in the immunized group with pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 was 0.50 mm three weeks after the challenge. The mean size of the lesions in both vaccinated group was meaningfully smaller than those in the control group (P< 0.05) (Table 1). In mice vaccinated with pEGFP-N1-KMP11-GP96 and pEGFPN1-KMP11, the cutaneous lesions were cured 197 and 201 d after challenge, respectively, while no healing was observed in the mice that received pEGFP-N1 and PBS.

Table 1:

The lesion size of immunized BALB/c in different groups after challenge with 2×106promastigotes of L. major

Groups Lesion size (mm) Lesion size (mm) Time of lesion healing (Day)
pEGFP-KMP-GP96 Maximun Mean ± SE 201
pEGFP-KMP 0.70 0.50± 0.22 197
pEGFP-N1 1.10 0.80± 0.25 0
PBS 20.15 17.60± 2.08 0
Open in a new tab

Discussion

Drugs currently used to treat Leishmaniasis have a number of problems, including high toxicity and various side effects (21). Therefore, attempts to introduce new candidates for the production of effective drugs and vaccines are still ongoing.

In general, Leishmania vaccines are divided into 3 categories (22). The first-generation vaccines consist of dead parasites, which have gradually replaced leishmanization. The first-generation vaccine have been made using complete killed parasites or their extracts. Numerous efforts have been made to develop such vaccines in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela and the Islamic Republic of Iran against leishmaniasis and in Sudan against visceral leishmaniasis .

Second-generation vaccines include genetically modified residual leishmaniasis, or bacteria or viruses carrying Leishmania antigen genes, or sub-units of synthetic or recombinant species, and native fractions purified from the parasite. Various proteins of Leishmania have been identified as antigens, gp63 (2), Hsp70 (3), TSA (4), PSA-2 (5), Histone H1 (6), LACK (7, 8). Many of these antigens have been identified that, when combined with adjuvants, they are able to provide protection in experimental animals, but to date, only one vaccine has been obtained in clinical evaluations (23). The rest have been provided little immunity against more than one species in animal models.

Third-generation vaccines include genes encoding an immunogenic antigen cloned in a eukaryotic promoter vector. Compared to the recombinant vaccine, DNA vaccines are more stable and have advantages such as cheap production, lack of need for a cold chain and flexibility in combining different genes of different species. These vaccines induce both humoral and cellular immune responses, and these responses can be shifted by altering the vector or attaching cytokine genes with adjuvant properties. Therefore, the immune response to the encoded antigen from the plasmid can be located in a pathway that produces resistance to the parasite (24). These vaccines provide a better immunity against Leishmania compared to dead or live vaccines, as they can induce expression of different Leishmania antigens without any kind of alteration in structure and antigenicity. DNA vaccines are naturally immunogenetic due to the presence of non-methylated CpG patterns in their structure, leading to the expression of Th1 cytokines and increased TCD8 + cell responses (25). In recent years, antigens such as LACK, LeIF, TSA, LmSTI1, H1, CPA + CPB, KMP-11, and NH36 have been used for production of third-generation vaccine against leishmaniasis.

Studies on KMP-11 protein have shown that KMP-11 clearly has three major immunological features: stimulation of B cell, inducing lymphocytic proliferation and cytotoxic response, and producing protective immunity in animal models. A study showed that immunoglobulin subtypes in response to KMP-11 protein include IgG1, IgG3, IgG2 and IgG4 (26). Some researchers have shown the ability of KMP-11 protein to induce proliferation of T-lymphocytes. KMP-11 of L.donovani, T. rhodesiense, T. brucei, T. congolense and T. simiae was a potent stimulator of CD4 +, CD8- in mice immunized with KMP-11 protein (16). Immunization of BALB/c mice with an attenuated strain of Toxoplasma gondii, which expresses the Leishmania KMP-11 protein, provides a specific and protective immune response in such animals (27). The evidence strongly suggests that this gene is an excellent target for immunotherapy and immunization against leishmaniasis.

GP96 as one of the most abundant intracellular heat shock proteins possesses multiple functions and its ability to bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems has attracted extensive interest. The immunogenicity of GP96 is dependent on its ability to bind peptide epitopes. Both the N- and C-terminal fragments of GP96 are able to bind peptides, with the N-terminal fragment behaving at a similar capacity to the full-length GP96 (20).

In our study, the constructed fusion showed a potency to elicit both Th1 &Th2 responses, but it showed the higher ratio of IFN- γ / IL-4 and IgG2a/IgG1 compare to control groups, indicating that the constructed fusion could well stimulate the cellular immune system in mice.

However, the role of Th1 was greater in the immune response against the infection. These results are in accordance with those of other reports that a higher ratio of the IgG2a/IgG1 isotype is associated with protective immunity against L. major infection in Balb/c mice. Nevertheless, of whether the healing resulted from low doses of parasites (28) or the healing resulted from immunization (29, 30).

Conclusion

We successfully cloned fusion of two genes in pEGFP-N1 to use it as a DNA vaccine. The constructed fusion could well stimulate both the cellular and humoral immune systems that led to cutaneous lesion healing in mice.

Acknowledgements

The present work is done in Tarbiat Modares University and supported financially by INSF) Iran National Science Foundation (Grant No. 92005467).

Footnotes

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Mohebali M, Kazemirad E, Hajjaran H, et al. Gene expression analysis of antimony resistance in Leishmania tropica using quantitative real-time PCR focused on genes involved in trypanothione metabolism and drug transport. Arch Dermatol Res. 2019; 311(1):9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Connell ND, Medina-Acosta E, McMaster WR, et al. Effective immunization against cutaneous leishmaniasis with recombinant bacilli Calmette Guerin expressing the Leishmania surface protein gp63. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1993; :11473–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Skeiky YA, Benson DR, Guderian JA, et al. Immune responses of leishmaniasis patients to heat shock proteins of Leishmania species and humans. Infect Immun.1995; 63(10): 4105–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Webb JR, Campos-Neto A, Ovendale PJ, et al. Human and murine immune responses to a novel L. major recombinant protein encoded by members of a multicopy gene family. Infect Immunol. 1998; 66:3279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sjolander A, Baldwin TM, Curtis J, Handman E. Induction of a Th1 immune response and simultaneous lack of activation of a Th2 response are required for generation of immunity to leishmaniasis. J Immunol. 1998;160: 3949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Solioz N, Blum-Tirouvanziam U, Jacqute R, et al. The protective capacities of histon H1 against experimental murine cutaneous leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 1999; 18: 850–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ziaee Hezarjaribi H, Ghaffarifar F, Dalimi A, et al. Effect of IL-22 on DNA vaccine encoding LACK gene of L. major in BALB/c mice. Exp Parasitol. 2013;134 :341–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jorjani O, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z, et al. LACK Gene’s immune response induced by cocktail DNA vaccine with IL-12 gene against cutaneous leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2018; 10, 3:134–140. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ghaffarifar F, Jorjani O, Sharifi Z, et al. Enhancement of immune response induced by DNA vaccine cocktail expressing complete LACK and TSA genes against Leishmania major. APMIS. 2013;121(4):290–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maspi N, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z. Dalimi A. Co-delivery of DNA vaccination encoding LeIF gene and IL-12 increases protection against Leishmania major infection in BALB/c mice. Parasite Immunol. 2016; 38:228–235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maspi N, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z, et al. Immunogenicity and efficacy of a bivalent DNA vaccine containing LeIF and TSA genes against murine cutaneous leishmaniasis. APMIS. 2017a; 125: 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maspi N, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z, et al. Comparative assessment of induced immune responses following intramuscular immunization with fusion and cocktail of LeIF, LACK and TSA genes against cutaneous leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2018, 66(1):55–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maspi N, Ghaffarifar F, Sharifi Z, et al. DNA vaccination with a plasmid encoding LACK-TSA fusion against Leishmania major infection in BALB/c mice. Malays J Pathol. 2017; 39(3):267–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.King DL, Chang YD, Turco SJ. Cell surface lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania donovani. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1987; 24: 47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Russo DM, Turco SJ, Burns JM, Jr, Reed SG. Stimulation of human T lymphocytes by Leishmania lipophosphoglycan-associated proteins. J Immunol. 1992; 148: 202–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Todoli F, Solano-Gallego L, de Juan R, et al. Humoral and in vivo cellular immunity against the raw insect-derived recombinant Leishmania infantum antigens KMPII, TRYP, LACK, and papLe22 in dogs from an endemic area. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010; 83 (6):1287–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang Y, Li Z. Roles of heat shock protein GP96 in the ER quality control: redundant or unique function? Mol Cells. 2005; 20 (2):173–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Binder RJ, Vatner R, Srivastava P. The heat-shock protein receptors: some answers and more questions. Tissue Antigens. 2004; 64:442–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li HT, Yan JB, Li J, et al. Enhancement of humoral immune responses to HBsAg by heat shock protein GP96 and its N-terminal fragment in mice. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:2858–2863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nasiri V, Dalimi A, Ghaffarifar F, et al. Immunogenicity and efficacy of live L. arentolae expressing KMP11-NTGP96 -GFP fusion as a vaccine candidate against experimental visceral leishmaniasis caused by L. Infantum. Iran J Parasitol. 2016; 11(2): 144–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sundar S, More DK, Singh MK, et al. Failure of pentavalent antimony in visceral leishmaniasis in India: report from the center of the Indian epidemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31(4):1104–7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garmory HS, Brown KA, Titball RW. DNA vaccines: improving expression of antigens. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2003; 1(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.WHO Control of the leishmaniases: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Commitee on the Control of Leishmaniases, Geneva, 22–26 March 2010, no. 949. p. 186.
  • 24.Nagill R, Kaur S. Vaccine candidates for leishmaniasis: a review. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011; 11(10):1464–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Borja-Cabrera GP, Santos FN, Bauer FS, et al. Immunogenicity assay of the Leishmune vaccine against canine visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Vaccine. 2008; 26(39): 4991–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trujillo C, Ramirez R, Velez ID, Berberich C. The humoral immune response to the kinetoplastid membrane protein-11 in patients with American leishmaniasis and Chagas disease prevalence of IgG subclasses and mapping of epitopes. Immunol Lett.1999; 70:203–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramirez JR, Gilchrist K, Robledo S, et al. Attenuated Toxoplasma gondii ts-4 mutants engineered to express the Leishmania antigen KMP-11 elicit a specific immune response in BALB/c mice. Vaccine. 2001; 20:455–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Uzonna JE, Wei G, Yurkowski D, Bretscher P. Immune elimination of Leishmania major in mice: Implications for immune memory, vaccination, and reactivation disease. J Immunol. 2001; 167, 6967–6974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamakami K, Akao S, Sato M, et al. A single intradermal administration of soluble leishmanial antigen and plasmid expressing interleukin-12 protects BALB/c mice from Leishmania major infection. Parasitol Int. 2001; 50, 81–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jaafari MR, Ghafarian A, Farrokh-Gisour A, et al. Immune response and protection assay of recombinant major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania (rgp63) reconstituted with liposomes in BALB/c mice. Vaccine. 2006; 24, 5708–5717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES