Abstract
Here, we find that the egg-adapted H3N2 component of the 2019 Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccine elicits an antibody response in ferrets that is highly focused on antigenic site A of hemagglutinin. This is potentially problematic as most H3N2 viruses currently circulating in the Southern Hemisphere possess antigenic site A substitutions.
Keywords: influenza virus, hemagglutinin, influenza vaccine, H3N2
Human egg-adapted 3c2.A H3N2 influenza vaccine strains possess adaptive substitutions that result in the loss of a key glycosylation site within antigenic site B of hemagglutinin (HA) [1]. We previously demonstrated that the 2016–2017 Northern Hemisphere egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain (A/Hong Kong/4801/2014) elicits HA antigenic site B antibodies that bind to the vaccine strain but not to circulating 3c2.A H3N2 strains [1]. This antigenic mismatch has been associated with low vaccine effectiveness during recent H3N2-dominated influenza seasons [2, 3].
The 3c2.A viruses recently diversified into several subgroups (Figure 1A), and a new H3N2 vaccine strain, A/Switzerland/8060/2017 (3c2.A2 subgroup), was recommended for the 2019 Southern Hemisphere vaccine formulation [4]. Similar to previous egg-adapted 3c2.A H3N2 vaccine strains, the HA of A/Switzerland/8060/2017 possesses a T160K HA substitution that results in the loss of a glycosylation site in antigenic site B of HA (Figure 1B). Interestingly, data from the World Health Organization indicate that antibodies elicited by the egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain are less focused toward HA antigenic site B compared to antibodies elicited by previous 3c2.A H3N2 egg-adapted vaccine strains [4]. To determine if the A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain is antigenically matched to H3N2 strains currently circulating in the Southern Hemisphere, we completed antigenic analyses using sera isolated from ferrets exposed to either wild-type or egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strains.
METHODS
Infection of Ferrets With Influenza Virus
We used reverse genetics [5] to create viruses with the wild-type or egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 HA. The egg-adapted HA possessed T160K and L194P substitutions in HA antigenic site B relative to the wild-type HA (Figure 1B). We rescued viruses using wild-type A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 NA and A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 internal genes to allow efficient viral growth in culture. Ferrets were infected with 3000 foci-forming units of virus with either HA, and then bled 35 days later. All animal experiments were completed under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee–approved protocol at Nobel Life Sciences.
Foci Reduction Neutralization Tests
Serum samples were treated with receptor-destroying enzyme (Denka Seiken) followed by heat inactivation at 55°C for 30 minutes prior to testing in foci reduction neutralization tests (FRNTs). FRNTs were performed as previously described [1] using ferret sera and 3c2.A2 viruses with wild-type and egg-adapted HAs. We also completed assays with a 3c2.A1 virus (wild-type A/Singapore/INFIMH-16–0019/2016) and 3c2.A2 viruses with single HA substitutions. Each sample was tested in 3 independent experiments and geometric mean titers of the replicates were used for analysis.
Statistical Methods
Log2-transformed antibody titers were compared using repeated measures 1-way analysis of variance corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni method). Statistical analysis was performed using Prism version 7.
RESULTS
Ferrets infected with the wild-type A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain mounted antibody responses that neutralized wild-type and egg-adapted 3c2.A2 viruses equivalently (Figure 1C). Ferrets infected with the egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain mounted antibody responses that efficiently neutralized egg-adapted 3c2.A2 virus and moderately neutralized wild-type 3c2.A2 virus (Figure 1D). Importantly, antibodies elicited by the wild-type and egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strains poorly neutralized the 3c2.A1 virus (Figure 1D). This is important as 3c2.A1 viruses are currently circulating at high levels in parts of the Southern Hemisphere [6]. These data suggest that antibodies elicited by the A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain are minimally affected by antigenic site B HA substitutions that distinguish wild-type and egg-adapted 3c2.A2 strains. This indicates that most antibodies elicited in ferrets by wild-type and egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strains target other HA epitopes that are mismatched between 3c2.A2 and 3c2.A1 viruses.
To further define the specificity of antibodies elicited by wild-type and egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strains, we completed additional FRNTs with a panel of 3c2.A2 viruses with different HA substitutions. We tested 3c2.A2 viruses that possess each of the HA substitutions (K131T, K142G, and Q261R) that distinguish 3c2.A2 viruses from other 3c2.A clades. Residue 142 is located in antigenic site A, residue 131 is located at the interface of antigenic sites A and B, and residue 261 is located in close proximity to antigenic site E (Figure 1B). Antibodies elicited by both the wild-type and egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strains efficiently neutralized 3c2.A2 viruses with either the K131T or Q261R HA substitutions but had reduced reactivity to the 3c2.A2 virus with the K142G HA substitution (Figure 1C and 1D). These data indicate that unlike past 3c2.A egg-adapted strains that elicit a heavily focused antigenic site B HA response [1], the egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain elicits antibody responses that are more directed toward epitopes involving residue 142 that is located in antigenic site A of HA.
DISCUSSION
It is interesting that the egg-adapted A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 strain elicits an antibody response focused toward HA antigenic site B [1], whereas we find that the egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain elicits an antibody response focused toward HA antigenic site A. We previously demonstrated that HA antigenic site A of a 1995 H3N2 strain was immunodominant, only if the HA possessed an N145K substitution within antigenic site A [7]. Similarly, Santos et al found that antigenic site A became immunodominant when K145 was introduced into a panel of distantly related H3 HAs [8]. The immune basis for these apparent immunodominance shifts are unknown, but it is possible that the presence of Lys in HA antigenic site A increases immunogenicity. Consistent with this idea, the egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 HA possesses K142, whereas the egg-adapted A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 HA possesses R142 and 3c2.A1 HAs possess G142.
There are several limitations to our study. Our study evaluated antibody responses elicited in ferrets, not humans. Studies from our laboratory and others [9] clearly demonstrate that the specificity of influenza virus antibodies elicited in ferrets and humans can differ because most humans have complex immune histories, whereas ferrets do not. It is also worth noting that we tested serum from ferrets that were intranasally infected with virus rather than vaccinated. Ferret serum used for antigenic analyses are typically prepared in this manner [4], but it is possible that vaccinations with the egg-adapted A/Switzerland/8060/2017 strain elicit antibodies of different specificities compared to infections.
The implications of these experiments are obvious: the egg-adapted H3N2 component of the 2019 Southern Hemisphere vaccine might elicit suboptimal antibody responses that react poorly to HA site A of 3c2.A1 viruses. 3c2.A1 H3N2 viruses have further evolved into a new subclade (3c2.A1b) and are dominating Oceania, while 3c2.A1b and 3c3.A H3N2 viruses are co-circulating in other parts of the Southern Hemisphere [6]. Vaccination is obviously still recommended because it is unclear if these viruses will continue to dominate circulation and it is unknown if vaccine effectiveness will be impacted by the potential antigenic mismatch identified in our study. Furthermore, the H1N1 and influenza B virus components of the 2019 Southern Hemisphere vaccine are likely well-matched to circulating strains and thus likely to provide good protection.
Notes
Acknowledgments. This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant numbers 1R01AI113047, 1R01AI108686, and Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance HHSN272201400005C to S. E. H.). S. E. H. holds an Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
Potential conflicts of interest. S. E. H. reports receiving consulting fees from Sanofi Pasteur, Lumen, Novavax, and Merck. All other authors report no potential conflicts. The authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Zost SJ, Parkhouse K, Gumina ME, et al. . Contemporary H3N2 influenza viruses have a glycosylation site that alters binding of antibodies elicited by egg-adapted vaccine strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:12578–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Chung J, et al. . 2014–2015 influenza vaccine effectiveness in the United States by vaccine type. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1564–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rolfes MA, Flannery B, Chung J, et al. . Effects of influenza vaccination in the United States during the 2017–2018 influenza season [manuscript published online ahead of print 2 February 2019]. Clin Infect Dis 2019. doi:10.1093/cid/ciz075. [Google Scholar]
- 4. World Health Organization. Recommended composition of influenza virus vaccines for use in the 2019 Southern Hemisphere influenza season. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chambers BS, Parkhouse K, Ross TM, Alby K, Hensley SE. Identification of hemagglutinin residues responsible for H3N2 antigenic drift during the 2014-2015 influenza season. Cell Rep 2015; 12:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hadfield J, Megill C, Bell SM, et al. . Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:4121–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li Y, Bostick DL, Sullivan CB, et al. . Single hemagglutinin mutations that alter both antigenicity and receptor binding avidity influence influenza virus antigenic clustering. J Virol 2013; 87:9904–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Santos JJS, Abente EJ, Obadan AO, et al. . Plasticity of amino acid residue 145 near the receptor binding site of H3 swine influenza A viruses and its impact on receptor binding and antibody recognition. J Virol 2019; 93:e01413–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cobey S, Hensley SE. Immune history and influenza virus susceptibility. Curr Opin Virol 2017; 22:105–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wiley DC, Skehel JJ. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus. Annu Rev Biochem 1987; 56:365–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Popova L, Smith K, West AH, et al. . Immunodominance of antigenic site B over site A of hemagglutinin of recent H3N2 influenza viruses. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]