Abstract
Chemical investigation of cyanobacterial strain HT-58–2, which most closely aligns with the genus Brasilomena, has led to the isolation of two compounds related to tolypodiol. The structures and absolute configuration of 6-deoxytolypodiol (1) and 11-hydroxytolypodiol (2) were elucidated by spectroscopic and spectrometric analysis. While tolypodiol previously showed anti-inflammatory activity in a mouse ear edema assay, only 2 reduced in vitro thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and superoxide anion (O2−) generation from Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated rat neonatal microglia to any appreciable degree.
Graphical Abstract

Cyanobacteria are well-known producers of secondary metabolites.1 The vast majority of these compounds are produced via a combination of polyketide synthase and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases.1 Deeper investigations into the biosynthesis of many of the peptidic compounds from cyanobacteria revealed a large number of those compounds were actually ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs).1 Taken together, these trends highlight the unusual nature of cultured cyanobacterial strain HT-58–2, originally classified as Tolypothrix nodosa based on morphology, but subsequent 16S rRNA analysis suggested it more closely resembles the genus Brasilonema.2 While the genome contains putative clusters for several typical cyanobacterial metabolites, the two main classes of secondary metabolites expressed under a variety of culture conditions belong to neither of these structural classes. Instead, the first set of compounds, the tolyporphins, are a unique series of tetrapyrroles remarkable for their structure2 and biological provenance that display potent activity as photodynamic therapy agents,3 while the second class of compounds is exemplified by the meroterpenoid tolypodiols.4 To date, only one naturally-occurring and one synthetic derivative of this latter class of anti-inflammatory compounds have been disclosed. Reported here are results of further investigations of strain HT-58–2, which was driven primarily by our interest in exploring the tolyporphins’ potential as photodynamic therapy agents given they are more potent in vivo than the FDA-approved drug photofrin.5, 6 These investigation have led to the isolation and structure elucidation of two tolypodiol analogs, 6-deoxytolypodiol (1) and 11-hydroxytolypodiol (2) from the tolyporphin-containing fraction, establishment of the absolute configurations of all members of the series (1–3) and biological evaluation of 1–3 in a model of pro-inflammatory mediator inhibition with relevance to neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s Disease.

From the extracts of HT-58–2 cultures, two new analogs of tolypodiol were discovered. Briefly, lyophilized biomass from HT-58–2 (43.35 g) was exhaustively extracted in 1:1 CH2Cl2:i-PrOH to produce an organic extract (2.33 g) after removal of solvent in vacuo. The residue was partitioned using a modified Kupchan partition,7 and the resulting CH2Cl2 extract separated using RP-flash chromatography and HPLC to yield 1 (0.5 mg), 2 (0.6 mg) and tolypodiols (3;8.6 mg). The tolypodiols were minor metabolites in the extract. with tolyporphins being the most abundant metabolites.
The planar structure of 1 was determined based on conventional spectroscopic and spectrometric approaches such as LC-MS, 1D, and 2D NMR-based experiments. The HRESIMS of 1 produced a protonated molecule at m/z 441.3000 [M+H]+ and established a neutral molecular formula of C28H40O4. The similarity of 1 to tolypodiol, also isolated from this strain, was deduced based on resonances found in the 1H NMR spectrum consistent with five methyl signals, a methoxy group, and a 1,2,4-substituted aromatic ring. A full spectroscopic analysis of 1 revealed the lack of a hydroxy group at C-6 (δC 18.2) relative to tolypodiol; a modification in agreement with the molecular formula differences which established the planar structure as depicted. Further evidence of this assessment was observed in a change of multiplicity of H-5 in tolypodiol from a doublet (δH 0.76, J = 2.2 Hz) to a doublet of doublets in 1 (δH 0.78, J = 12.1, 2.6 Hz).
The relative configuration of the molecule was determined through analyses of 2D-ROESY correlations (Figure 1). The methine proton at C-1 was assigned an axial orientation in the ring system on the basis of an 11 Hz coupling to H-2, indicating the corresponding hydroxy group was in an equatorial orientation. Overall, the relative configuration for 1 is consistent with that reported for tolypodiol.
Figure 1.

Key correlations (double-headed arrows) used to determine relative configuration of 1.
The planar structure of 11-hydroxytolypodiol 2 was deduced in a similar manner. The HRESIMS of 2 produced a protonated molecule at m/z 473.2895 [M+H]+ and established a molecular formula of C28H40O6. The presence of an additional hydroxy group relative to tolypodiol was evident from the signal at δH 4.87 in the 1H NMR spectrum and was consistent with the proposed molecular formula. Analysis of the full 1D and 2D-NMR data revealed this hydroxy group was in an axial orientation at C-11 based on the three small 4.8, 2.7, and 2.1 Hz couplings of proton H-11 to protons at H-9 and H2-12. Through a similar analysis of JH-H coupling, the relative orientations of the carbinol protons at C-1 and C-6 were found to be the same as that observed in tolypodiol.
The absolute configurations of 1–3 were determined through ECD spectroscopy. Conformational analysis of 1R,5S,8R,9S,13S,14S-1, using Monte Carlo multiple minimization (MCMM) with the OPLS-2005 force field in MacroModel identified 10 conformers within 5 kcal/mol of the lowest energy conformer. A comparison with the experimental NMR data revealed no obvious contradictions in terms of expected coupling constants thus validating the conformational analysis. These optimized structure and the vibrational frequencies of these conformers were subsequently calculated in Gaussian098 at the B3LYP9/DEF2SVP10 level. Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)11 calculations were performed using Gaussian098 with six different functional and basis sets (Figure S15) to predict ECD spectra for the conformers of the 1R,5S,8R,9S,13S,14S enantiomer. The Boltzmann weighted ECD spectrum of these conformers, calculated using SpecDis,12 was compared to the experimental data for 1 at all levels. These data were in good agreement with ΔESI values ranging from 0.875–0.92412 and similarity factors of 0.908–0.926 and 0.0324–0.007 for the 1R,5S,8R,9S,13S,14S-configuration and its enantiomer, respectively (Figures 2A and S15). The ECD spectra of 1–3 (Figure 2B) displayed similar Cotton effects suggesting the same absolute configuration. Slightly different Δε values were obtained despite our efforts to normalize the concentrations of 1–2 by UV (260 nm) in comparison to the more abundant 3.
Figure 2.

Panel A) Comparison of BH&HLYP10/DEF2TZVPP13 calculated (red) and experimental (black) ECD curves for 1. Panel B) Experimental ECD curves for 6-deoxytolypodiol (1; black), 11-hydroxytolypodiol (2; purple) and tolypodiol (3; green).
There are relatively few cyanobacterial natural products that primarily use isoprene components as building blocks.1 Noscomin14 and the comnostins15 isolated from the media extract of Nostoc commune are two other examples. The closest structural relatives to the tolypodiols are taondiol and its derivatives, isolated from marine brown algae, but their carbon skeletons differ with regards to substituents on the aromatic ring.16
At the time of its original isolation, tolypodiol (3) was shown to reduce chemically-induced inflammation in an in vivo mouse ear edema assay4 (ED50 30 μg/ear for 3 vs 20 μg/ear for the positive control). As the yields of 1–2 precluded testing in the original assay system, 1–3 were assessed for their effects on in vitro activation and generation of proinflammatory mediators by rat neonatal microglia (Figure 3) using the standard inflammation models in our labs.17,18 Only 2 significantly inhibited the generation of proinflammatory thromboxane B2 (TXB2) (apparent IC50= 0.1 μM). Lack of inhibition of superoxide anion (O2−) generation suggests that 2 inhibits TXB2 generation in rat microglia through a mechanism that may be cyclooxygenase dependent. Compound 2 is more potent in this assay system than acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) (IC50 3.12–10 μM), a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug used to treat pain, fever and inflammation. Further pharmacological and toxicological investigation of 2 in both in vitro and in vivo models of neuroinflammation thus appears to be warranted given modulation of TXB2 and O2− has been proposed as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of several neurodegenerative diseases where microglia activation has been implicated.19
Figure 3.

Panel A) tolypodiol (3), B) 11-hydroxytolypodiol (2) and C) 6-dexoytolypodiol (1). PMA-stimulated O2− and TXB2 generation for tolypodiol, 2 and 1 were determined as described.19 Data are expressed as percentage of untreated control O2− and TXB2 release triggered by PMA (1 μM) for 70 min. The data shown are the mean ± SD of 1 independent experiment with two replicates.
In summary, two new tolypodiols analogs have been isolated and characterized from the original strain doubling the number of known members of this series. Compounds 1 and 2 differ from the previous reported analog, tolypodiol acetate, as they differ in the oxidation state at C-6 and C-11, which suggests these modifications may occur late in the biosynthesis after the majority of the structure has been assembled. While we could not directly compare the anti-inflamatory activity of the new compounds with tolypodiol using the original assay system due to the limited quantities available, the ability of all three compounds to activate and generate proinflammatory mediators by rat neonatal microglia was determined, with only 2 showing appreciable biological activity at an apparent IC50= 0.1 μM. Compound 2 showed a similar level of TXB2 inhibition as the clinically approved NSAID flurbiprofen (apparent IC50 = 100 nM)20 and was an order of magnitude more potent than aspirin.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
General Experimental Procedures.
Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco-DIP-700 polarimeter at the sodium line (589 nm). UV spectra were obtained on a Hewlett-Packard 8453 spectrophotometer, and IR spectra were measured as a thin film on a CaF2 disc using a Perkin Elmer 1600 series FTIR. All 1D and 2D NMR spectra with the exception of 13C NMR spectra were acquired on a Varian Unity Inova 500 MHz spectrometer operating at 500 (1H) or 125 (13C) MHz using the residual solvent signals (δH 7.26 and δC.77.0) as an internal reference. 13C NMR spectra were acquired on a Varian Unity 600 MHz spectrometer. NMR samples were analyzed in 3 mm Shigemi NMR tubes. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data were obtained on an Agilent 6545 LC-MS Q-ToF with ESI ionization in the positive mode. Gradient HPLC separations used a Shimadzu system consisting of LC-20AT Solvent Delivery Modules, an SPDM20A VP Diode Photodiode Array Detector, and an SCL-20A VP System Controller.
Cultivation of Cyanobacteria.
Cultures were revived from cryostorage and grown in BG-11 media.21 Phyogenetic characterization and genomic sequencing of this strain has been previously reported.2 For large-scale harvests, cultures were grown in 20 L Pyrex carboys and aerated at a flow rate of 5 L/min while under continuous illumination of fluorescent light banks.22 Cell material was harvested after 45 days of growth via decantation and filtration to be freeze-dried prior to extraction.
Extraction and Isolation of Meroterpenes.
The lyophilized biomass from HT-58–2 (43.35 g) was exhaustively extracted in 1:1 CH2Cl2:i-PrOH to produce an extract (2.33 g) after removal of solvent in vacuo. The residue was partitioned using a modified Kupchan extraction into four fractions (hexanes; 607.8 mg, CH2Cl2; 534.9 mg, BuOH; 28.5 mg and aq. MeOH; 100 mg). The CH2Cl2 extract (534.9 mg) was further fractionated over C8 silica gel using a step gradient of increasing amounts of MeOH in H2O (25%; 86.1 mg, 50%; 38.2 mg, 75%; 52.6 mg, 100% MeOH; 275.6 mg). Tolypodiol (3) (8.6 mg, 0.09% yield, >99% purity by UV at 265 nm, tR 18.0 min) and 11-hydroxytolypodiol (2) (0.6 mg, 0.007% yield, 97% purity by UV at 265 nm, tR 14.0 min) were isolated from the 75% MeOH fraction, which contained tolyporphins,6, 23 using a linear gradient (2.7 mL/min) of CH3CN in H2O modified with 0.1% formic acid from 70–100% CH3CN over 30 min and then 100% CH3CN over 15 min on a Luna C18 (10 μ, 250 × 10 mm) semi-preparative column. Another portion of the 75% MeOH extract of the CH2Cl2 partition, was purified by preparative RP-HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C18, 150 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm 100 Å; with a linear gradient of CH3CN in H2O with 0.1% formic acid from 75% to 100% CH3CN over 25 min, and held at 100% CH3CN for an additional 10 min; flowrate 15 mL/min) with fractions automatically collected every minute. Fractions 25 and 26 were combined from this purification and subjected to a linear gradient (3.5 mL/min) of EtOAc in hexanes from 20–95% over 30 min and then 100% EtOAc over 15 min on a Luna 10 μ Silica (2) (100 Å 250 × 10 mm) semi-preparative column which led to the isolation of 6-deoxytolypodiol (1) (tR 8.1 min, 0.5 mg, 0.001% yield, >90% purity by 1H NMR).
6-Deoxytolypodiol (1):
white, amorphous solid; −480 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 291 (3.67), 264 (4.18) nm; ECD (1.1 × 10−4 M, MeOH), λmax (Δε) 262 (−3.5), 222 (1.2) nm IR (CaF2 disc) νmax 3408, 2928, 1732, 1653, 1558, 1263 cm−1; NMR data Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 441.3000 [M+H]+ (calcd for C28H41O4+, 441.2999).
Table 1:
NMR Spectroscopic Data for 1 and 2 (1H 500 MHz, 13C 125 MHz, CDCl3)
| 1 | 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | δC, Type | δH (J in Hz) | δC, type | δH (J in Hz) |
| 1 | 79.9, CH | 3.39, dd (9.2, 6.4) | 78.7, CH | 3.46, dd (11.0, 5.0) |
| 2a | 30.0, CH2 | 1.62, m | 29.0, CH2 | 1.79, m |
| 2b | 1.67, m | 1.81, m | ||
| 3a | 39.7, CH2 | (eq.) 1.37, m | 41.4, CH2 | 1.35, m |
| 3b | (ax.) 1.29, m | 1.28, m | ||
| 4 | 33.0, C | - | 33.7, C | - |
| 5 | 55.0, CH | 0.78, dd (12.1, 2.6) | 57.1, CH | 0.85, d (2.5) |
| 6a | 18.2, CH2 | (eq.) 1.58, m | 69.1, CH | 4.52, ddd (4.0, 2.4, 1.6) |
| 6b | (ax.) 1.50, m | - | - | |
| 7a | 40.8, CH2 | (eq.) 1.78, dt (12.6, 3.2) | 50.6, CH2 | (eq.) 2.07, dd (14.2, 2.1) |
| 7b | (ax.) 1.04, ddd (12.7, 12.7, 4.4) | (ax.) 1.31, dd (14.5, 4.1) | ||
| 8 | 38.0, C | - | 37.4, C | - |
| 9 | 61.2, CH | 1.16, dd (11.0, 2.2) | 61.2, CH | 1.01, d (2.7) |
| 10 | 43.6, C | 43.8, C | - | |
| 11a | 21.3, CH2 | (eq.) 2.68, ddd (14.2, 3.5, 3.5) | 69.8, CH | 4.87, ddd (4.8, 2.7, 2.1) |
| 11b | (ax.) 1.47, m | |||
| 12a | 41.1, CH2 | (eq.) 2.06, ddd (12.6, 3.4, 3.4) | 47.3, CH2 | 1.90, dd (13.8, 4.4) |
| 12b | (ax.) 1.71, ddd (13.1, 13.1, 4.2) | 2.34, dd (14.0, 2.7) | ||
| 13 | 77.9, C | - | 77.0, CH | - |
| 14 | 52.1, CH | 1.63, m | 52.7, CH | 1.56, dd (13.2, 4.6) |
| 15a | 22.1, CH2 | 2.62, m | 22.0, CH2 | 2.85, dd (16.3, 13.5) |
| 15b | 2.69, dd (16.6, 4.8) | |||
| 16 | 122.1, C | - | 122.2, C | - |
| 17 | 157.6, C | - | 157.1, C | - |
| 18 | 116.9, CH | 6.75, d (8.5) | 116.8, CH | 6.75, d (8.6) |
| 19 | 128.9, CH | 7.75, dd (8.5, 2.2) | 129.0, CH | 7.75, dd (8.5, 1.9) |
| 20 | 121.3, C | - | 121.2, C | - |
| 21 | 132.0, CH | 7.78, d (2.1) | 131.8, CH | 7.80, d (1.2) |
| 22 | 32.8, CH3 | 0.84, s | 32.4, CH3 | 0.96, s |
| 23 | 21.0, CH3 | 0.81, s | 23.5, CH3 | 1.24, s |
| 24 | 12.3, CH3 | 0.92, s | 15.5, CH3 | 1.65, s |
| 25 | 16.2, CH3 | 0.91, s | 17.9, CH3 | 1.57, s |
| 26 | 20.7, CH3 | 1.19, s | 21.6, CH3 | 1.42, s |
| 27 | 167.2, C | - | 167.2, C | - |
| 28 | 51.7, CH3 | 3.86, s | 51.8, CH3 | 3.87, s |
11-Hydroxytolypodiol (2):
white, amorphous solid; −160 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 290 (3.81), 264 (4.27) nm; ECD (1.1 × 10−4 M, MeOH), λmax (Δε) 262 (−1.9), 222 (1.2) nm IR (CaF2 disc) νmax 3472, 2928, 2852, 1699, 1608, 1581, 1437, 1437, 1269 cm−1; NMR data Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 473.2895 [M+H]+ (calcd for C28H41O6+, 473.2898).
Tolypodiol (3):
ECD (1.1 × 10−4 M, MeOH), λmax (Δε) 264 (−3.7), 223 (1.2) nm.
Biological Assay:
Rat neonatal microglia were isolated and the assay performed as previously described.18 Primary rat neonatal microglia (200,000 cells/well) were activated with LPS (0.3 ng/mL) for 17 h at 39.5 °C. Thereafter, each compound was added 20 min before microglia were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) at 1 μM for an additional 70 min. PMA-stimulated O2- and TXB2 generation were determined as described18 using immunoassay (Cayman Chemicals) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were run in duplicate.
Computational Analysis.
Conformers within 5 kcal/mol of the lowest energy conformer were searched using the Monte Carlo multiple minimum (MCMM) method and the OPLS-200524 force field in MacroModel25 (Schrodinger Inc.). Each conformer within 5 kcal/mol of the lowest energy conformer was optimized in Gaussian098 at the B3LYP26/DEF2SVP10 level and the geometries of all conformers with similar energies were checked for redundancy. Density functional theory (DFT) was used to perform calculations, which were carried out in Gaussian 09. TDDFT11 calculations at the several levels, including BH&HLYP10/DEF2TZVPP,13 were conducted to calculate the electronic excitation energies and rotational strengths in MeOH. Boltzmann weighted ECD spectra (Figure S15) were calculated using SpecDis12 for comparison with the experimentally determined data recorded in MeOH and to calculate similarity factors between experimental and computational spectra.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment.
A.M.S.M thanks L. Phelps, Z,. Memedovski and R. Schneider for expert technical assistance with the rat microglia brain cultures, for performing O2− and TXB2 ELISA assays and data analysis, and L.Phelps for preparing the figures. This work was supported by NIH grant 5R01AG039468 to PW. Funds for the upgrades of the NMR instrumentation were provided by the CRIF program of the National Science Foundation (CH E9974921), the Elsa Pardee Foundation, and the University of Hawaii at Manoa. The purchase of the Agilent TOF LC-MS was funded by grant W911NF-04-1-0344 from the Department of Defense, and the purchase of the Agilent QTOF LC-MS was funded by MRI grant 1532310 from the National Science Foundation. We gratefully acknowledge the advanced computing resources provided by the University of Hawaii Information Technology Service Cyberinfrastructure, and E. Haglund (UH Manoa) for the use of the ECD instrument. A.M.S.M. thanks the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at Midwestern University for generous funding support for the collaborative research project.
Footnotes
Supporting Information.
Copies of the 1H, 13C, and 2D NMR spectroscopic data for all new compounds, including fids, for all new compounds.
REFERENCES
- (1).Tidgewell K; Clark BR; Gerwick WH, The Natural Products Chemistry Of Cyanobacteria In Comprehensive Natural Products II: Chemistry and Biology, Elsevier Ltd: 2010; Vol. 2, pp 141–188. [Google Scholar]
- (2).Hughes R-A; Zhang Y; Zhang R; Williams PG; Lindsey JS; Miller S Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2017, 83, 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Morliere P; Maziere JC; Santus R; Smith CD; Prinsep MR; Stobbe CC; Fenning MC; Golberg JL; Chapman JD Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 3571–3578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Prinsep MR; West ML; Wylie BL J. Nat. Prod 1996, 59, 786–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Barnhart-Dailey M; Zhang Y; Zhang R; Anthony SM; Aaron JS; Miller ES; Lindsey JS; Timlin JA Photosynth. Res 2019, 141, 259–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Gurr JR; Dai J; Philbin CS; Sartain HT; O’Donnell TJ; Yoshida WY; Rheingold AL; Williams PG J. Org. Chem 2019, 85, 318–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Kupchan SM; Tsou G; Sigel CW J. Org. Chem 1973, 38, 1420–1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Frisch MJT,GW; Schlegel HB; Scuseria GE; Robb MA; Cheeseman JR; Scalmani G; Barone V; Mennucci B; Petersson GA; Nakatsuji H; Caricato M; Li X; Hratchian HP; Izmaylov AF; Bloino J; Zheng G; Sonnenberg JL; Hada M; Ehara M; Toyota K; Fukuda R; Hasegawa J; Ishida M; Nakajima T; Honda Y; Kitao O; Nakai H; Vreven T; Montgomery JA; Peralta JE; Ogliaro F; Bearpark M; Heyd JJ; Brothers E; Kudin KN; Staroverov VN; Kobayashi R; Normand J; Raghavachari K; Rendell A; Burant JC; Iyengar SS; Tomasi J; Cossi M; Rega N; Millam JM; Klene M; Knox JE; Cross JB; Bakken V; Adamo C; Jaramillo J; Gomperts R; Stratmann RE; Yazyev O; Austin AJ; Cammi R; Pomelli C; Ochterski JW; Martin RL; Morokuma K; Zakrzewski VG; Voth GA; Salvador P; Dannenberg JJ; Dapprich S; Daniels AD; Farkas; Foresman JB; Ortiz JV; Cioslowski J; Fox DJ Gaussian 09 Revision C.01 Wallingford CT 2009.
- (9).Stephens PJ; Devlin FJ; Chabalowski CF; Frisch MJ J. Phys. Chem 1994, 98, 11623–11627. [Google Scholar]
- (10).Weigend F; Ahlrichs R PCCP 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Runge E; Gross EKU Phys. Rev. Lett 1984, 52, 997–1000. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Bruhn T; Schaumloffel A; Hemberger Y; Bringmann G Chirality 2013, 25, 243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Weigend F PCCP 2006, 8, 1057–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Jaki B; Orjala J; Sticher OJ Nat. Prod 1999, 62, 502–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Jaki B; Orjala J; Heilmann J; Linden A; Vogler B; Sticher OJ Nat. Prod 2000, 63, 339–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Gonzales AG; Darias J; Martin JD Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 8, 2729–2732. [Google Scholar]
- (17).Swanson-Mungerson M; Williams P; Gurr JR; Incrocci R; Subramaniam V; Radowska K; Hall ML; Mayer AMS Toxicol. Sci 2019, 171, 421–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Klemm LC; Czerwonka E; Hall ML; Williams PG; Mayer AMS Toxins 2018, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Aviles E; Prudhomme J; Le Roch KG; Franzblau SG; Chandrasena K; Mayer AM; Rodriguez AD Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2015, 25, 5339–5343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Fiebich BL; Lieb K; Hull M; Aicher B; van Ryn J; Pairet M; Engelhardt G Neuropharmacology 2000, 39, 2205–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Rippka R; Deruelles J; Waterbury JB; Herdman M; Stanier RY Microbiology 1979, 111, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
- (22).Patterson GML; Baldwin CL; Bolis CM; Caplan FR; Karuso H; Larsen LK; Levine IA; Moore RE; Nelson CS; Tschappat KD; Tuang GD; Furusawa E; Furusawa S; Norton TR; Raybourne RB J. Phycol 1991, 27, 530–536. [Google Scholar]
- (23).Minehan TG; Cook-Blumberg L; Kishi Y; Prinsep MR; Moore RE Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 1999, 38, 926–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Harder E; Damm W; Maple J; Wu C; Reboul M; Xiang JY; Wang L; Lupyan D; Dahlgren MK; Knight JL; Kaus JW; Cerutti DS; Krilov G; Jorgensen WL; Abel R; Friesner RA J. Chem. Theory Comput 2016, 12, 281–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).MacroModel, S, LLC, New York, NY, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- (26).Becke AD J. Chem. Phys 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
