Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Poultry Science logoLink to The Journal of Poultry Science
. 2020 Apr 25;57(2):175–182. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0190014

Meat Quality and Cooking Characteristics in Broilers Influenced by Winter Transportation Distance and Crate Density

Faisal Hussnain 1,✉, Athar Mahmud 1, Shahid Mehmood 1, Muhammad H Jaspal 2
PMCID: PMC7248002  PMID: 32461733

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the effect of transportation distance and crating density on meat quality traits during winter. ROSS-308 broilers aged 35 days were divided into 10 treatment groups based on three transportation distances (80, 160, and 240 km) with three crating densities (10, 12, and 15 birds per crate) along with birds slaughtered on farm without crating as a control group. Each treatment was replicated 10 times and placed at various locations in the truck. The birds were transported in plastic crates of 0.91 m×0.55 m×0.30 m at ambient temperature and relative humidity of 3.6–9.5°C and 63.3–78.8%, respectively. The breast meat quality parameters including pH, color, drip loss, shear force, marinade uptake and retention, cooking losses, and yield were determined. The results showed significantly higher pH 15 min post-slaughter (PS), drip loss, lightness, marinade uptake, raw meat cooking yield, and shear force in birds slaughtered on farm without any transportation. The birds transported for 240 km had significantly higher pH at 2 hours (h) PS, marinade retention, and cooking yield. Whereas, pH at 24 h PS, meat redness, yellowness, chroma, and marinated meat cooking yield were significantly higher in all transported treatments compared to the control group. Among different crating densities, the birds transported with 10 birds per crate showed significantly higher meat redness, marinade retention, and cooking yield. The crating density of 15 birds per crate had significantly higher lightness, hue, cooking loss, and shear force. However, no effect of crating density was observed on meat pH, drip loss, and marinade uptake. It can be concluded that an increase in transportation distance and low crating density during winter can negatively affect physical quality of meat with significant improvement in marination and cooking characteristics.

Keywords: cooking, crating, marination, meat quality, transportation, winter

Introduction

Broiler welfare and meat quality traits are serious concerns for the global poultry industry. After spending the growing phase in an environment-controlled poultry house, the sudden exposure of broilers to physiological stress, during their transportation to processing plants negatively affects their well-being (Savenije et al., 2002). The major factors associated with stress during transportation include feed and water deprivation, catching, crating density, thermal variations, and duration and distance of transportation (Delezie et al., 2007; Orlic et al., 2007). The interaction of these factors not only cause economic losses due to mortality and live weight shrinkage but can also deteriorate meat quality traits (Kannan et al., 1997; Nijdam et al., 2004).

The ambient temperature during transportation affects muscle metabolism by inducing physiological changes and fatigue in birds (Petracci et al., 2001). Higher temperatures are associated with higher carcass temperature and faster postmortem pH decline (Mitchell and Kettlewell, 2004; Guarnieri et al., 2004). Conversely, low environmental temperature coupled with air drafts due to movement of the truck can cause cold stress (Minka and Ayo, 2015). The cold stress can deteriorate meat quality traits because of depletion in body glycogen due to increased energy metabolism to maintain body temperature (Dadgar et al., 2010). The subsequent effect of these variables varies according to the length of journey due to depression in liver and muscle glycogen contents (Warriss et al., 1993; Kannan et al., 1997). Lower glycogen contents before slaughtering can cause low lactic acid production in birds (Gregory, 1994; Lawrie, 1998). Meat with low lactic acid content is expected to have higher ultimate pH (pHu) than normal (Dadgar et al., 2010).

Investigating the effect of transportation distance, different studies have reported that an increase in transportation distance has been associated with higher pHu, lower lightness, shear force, drip, and cooking losses (Yalçin and Güler, 2012; dos Santos et al., 2017). On the other hand, Zhang et al. (2009) reported no effect of transportation (up to 3 h) on meat quality traits in broilers. Similarly, Sowinska et al. (2013) also reported no effect of winter transportation (0–300 km) on meat pH and color parameters except water holding capacity (WHC), which increased with higher transportation distance. These studies suggest that variations in climatic conditions in different geographical regions of the world are associated with contradictory effects of transportation distance on meat quality. The ambient environment or climate during transportation changes the microclimate of the vehicle. The season of transportation, length of journey, and crating density are the major determinants of the microclimate of the vehicle (Barbosa filho et al., 2008).

The optimal loading density varies according to ambient temperature and bird size (Elrom, 2000; Whiting et al., 2007). Provision of more space will affect the transporter economically as well as produce chilling during winter, while less space can cause welfare issues (Watts et al., 2011). The space and traveling distance can also cause physical consequences such as bruising, injury, and death due to fighting, trampling, or suffocation (Moran and Bilgili, 1995; Elrom, 2000). The effect of elevated temperature transportation is comprehensively reviewed by many studies. However, data regarding meat quality under the influence of crating densities in the winter season and its interaction with journey length are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of winter transportation under various crating densities.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Birds

The study was conducted at the Department of Poultry Production, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore-Pakistan. ROSS-308 broilers (body weight 1900–2050 g; age: 35 days) were selected from a commercial farm after four hours of feed withdrawal before catching. During the growing phase, the broilers were fed with standard broiler rations and raised on a litter floor in an environmental controlled broiler house under optimum management conditions. The sampling was based on transportation distance and crating density (3×3=9 treatments+1 control group). Transportation distance was categorized as short (80 km), medium (160 km), and long (240 km) under three crating densities: 10 birds (0.050 m2/ bird), 12 birds (0.042 m2/bird), and 15 birds (0.033 m2/ bird) per crate. The control group comprises birds slaughtered on farm (n=30) without crating and transportation while applying four hours of feed withdrawal. The birds were transported in commercial trucks (capacity 144 crates) in loose plastic crates (Engi Plastic Industries Pvt. Ltd., Sundar, Lahore-Pakistan) having a dimension of 0.91 m (length) × 0.55 m (width) × 0.30 m (height). To reduce the effect of the microenvironment, each treatment was replicated 10 times and placed at various locations in the trucks and the meat sample (s) were collected randomly from all locations. All the protocols and birds handling were performed in accordance with the laws and regulations of Pakistan and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore-Pakistan (No: DR/916-2017).

Climatic Indices

The experiment was conducted during the winter season (January) and the birds were transported in the vicinity of Kasur and Lahore district, in Punjab, Pakistan. The birds subjected to transportation distances of 160 and 240 km were first transported in laps of 40 km from the farm and then transported to a slaughtering facility located almost 80 km from the farm. The birds transported 80 km were directly sent for slaughtering. The temperature and relative humidity were recorded with the help of a digital weather tracker (Kestrel 4500 NV, Nielsen-Kellerman, USA). The temperature range and relative humidity measured at various times and distances remained between 3.6–9.5°C and 63.3–78.8%, respectively. There were patches of mild to severe fog at several locations along the journey.

Meat Quality Measurements

Upon reaching the slaughtering facility, three tagged birds from each replicate were randomly picked and slaughtered manually with a knife following halal slaughtering. Birds were then defeathered and eviscerated. After recording some initial parameters, carcasses were placed in chilled water to reduce the temperature and the following meat quality parameters were recorded.

pH Measurement

The pH of individual breasts was measured from three different places at 15 min (initial pH), 2 h and 24 h {ultimate pH (pHu)} post-slaughtering using an electronic pH meter (ProfiLine pH 3110 SET 2, WTW, Germany). The probe was rinsed with deionized water after every reading and between the samples. The pH was measured from warm carcass at 15 min, while pH was recorded from deboned breast samples stored at 4°C in display chiller at 2 h and 24 h (S80100VVC, Tecnodom S.P.A., Italy).

Meat Color

The breast meat (pectoralis major) was separated from the carcass and placed in polystyrene food grade trays covered with cling film (250 mm thickness) and kept in a display chiller (S80100VVC, Tecnodom S.P.A., Italy) at 4°C. The meat color (L*=lightness, a*=redness, b*=yellowness, chroma=saturation, and hue=angle that the metric chroma line makes with the+a* axis) was measured at 24 h postmortem employing the Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE, 1976) L*a*b* system using a chroma meter (Minolta® CR-410, Konica Minolta, Inc. Japan). The color was measured by placing the Minolta head at cranial, middle, and caudal region (skin side) of the breast free of any obvious color defects such as bruises, discolorations, hemorrhages or any other condition that may have affected the uniform color reading.

Drip Loss (%)

Following Honikel (1998), the drip loss (%) was measured by hanging the breast muscle (weight 165–174 g) by a thread in a polythene bag under atmospheric pressure for 24 h at 4°C.

Marination

One day after slaughtering, the marination of six breast fillets per treatment (kept at 4°C) with 4% brine solution (chilled overnight) was performed. Marination was carried out by immersing a batch of 10 fillets (pre-weighed w1) in marinade solution and manually tumbling by hand for 15 minutes for maximum absorption of brine. After performing marination, the individual fillets were reweighed (w2) to determine the brine uptake. The fillets of each treatment were placed in polystyrene trays and held overnight at 4C before individual fillets were reweighed (w3) to calculate marinade retention using the formulas.

graphic file with name jpsa-57_175_1.jpg

Cooking

The breast meat samples, with and without marination (having uniform weight in each type of meat), were individually packed in labeled polythene zipper bags (food grade). The bags were placed in a water bath (WNB45 Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany) operating at 80°C. The samples were cooked until the core temperature reached 72°C. The temperature was monitored at the thickest part of the breast using a hand-held digital thermometer (TP-101, China). The cooked fillets were cooled on ice, drained, blotted dry, and reweighed (w4) to calculate the cooking loss and yield of raw and marinated breast fillets using the formula:

graphic file with name jpsa-57_175_2.jpg

Shear Force

The Warner Bratzler Shear Force value (N/cm2) of raw and marinated meat was analyzed using a texture analyzer (TA.XT plus® texture analyzer, Stable Micro System, UK). Three rectangular blocks, each with a cross section of 1×1 cm and fiber direction parallel to a long dimension of 2 to 3 cm, were cut from each cooked fillet (Dadgar et al., 2010). The fibers were cut with a V slot blade perpendicular to their direction.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected were analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique under completely randomized design. The means were considered significant at a p value of 0.05. For the separation of means, Tukey's HSD test was used with the help of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, 2013).

Results

In the present experiment, the pH of the meat measured at 15 min, 2 h and 24 h PS remained significantly different (P<0.05) among different transportation distances (Table 1). At 15 min PS, the birds in the control group showed the highest pH compared to all the transported treatments. On the other hand, at 2 h PS, the same control group had the lowest pH compared to the rest of the treatments. At 24 h PS (ultimate pH) the birds transported up to 240 km had the highest pH followed by those transported for 160 and 80 km and the least in the control group (Table 1). The findings revealed non-significant differences (P>0.05) among various crating densities for PS pH but the differences were significant in transportation distance × crating density interaction (Table 1).

Table 1. Meat pH and drip loss % under transportation distance and crating densities.

Treatments pH 15 min pH 2h pH 24h Drip Loss %
Distance
0 Km 6.68±0.04a 6.14±0.03b 5.81±0.02c 1.87±0.07a
80 Km 6.55±0.03b 6.27±0.02a 6.01±0.02b 1.62±0.03b
160 Km 6.49±0.02b 6.26±0.02a 6.04±0.02b 1.17±0.03c
240 Km 6.48±0.02b 6.30±0.03a 6.12±0.02a 0.99±0.03d
Density
10 birds/crate 6.49±0.02 6.31±0.02 6.10±0.02 1.21±0.07
12 birds/crate 6.50±0.02 6.25±0.03 6.03±0.02 1.27±0.08
15 birds/crate 6.53±0.03 6.27±0.02 6.03±0.02 1.31±0.09
P-value
Distance 0.0001 0.0134 <0.0001 <0.0001
Density 0.4898 0.2566 0.066 0.6311
Interactions 0.0094 0.0373 <0.0001 <0.0001
Open in a new tab

Note: Different alphabets (a, b, c) on means showing significant differences (P<0.05) among treatment groups (Mean±S.E.M.)

Similarly, the drip loss % was also found to be significantly different (P<0.05) among different transportation distances and interactions of transportation distance X crating density while the differences remained non-significant (P>0.05) among different crating densities (Table 1). Among different transportation distances, the birds slaughtered on farm had the highest drip loss % and a gradual decrease was observed with increase in transportation distance (Table 1).

Among different meat color parameters, the lightness (L*) of the meat was found to be significantly higher in the control group while the redness (a*), yellowness (b*), and chroma was significantly lowest in the control group compared to all transported treatments (Table 2). Similarly, among different crating densities, the birds transported with 15 birds per crate had the highest (P<0.05) lightness and lower redness compared to birds transported at 12 and 10 bird/crate density. The meat hue was found to be higher in the birds transported at 12 and 15 birds per crate density compared to those having 10 birds per crate density (Table 2). There was no significant difference in meat yellowness and chroma among different crating densities.

Table 2. Meat color under various transportation distance and crating density.

Treatments Lightness (L*) Redness (a*) Yellowness (b*) Chroma
(c)		 Hue
(h)
Distance
0 km 56.73±0.26a 13.20±0.53b 14.68±1.23b 19.79±1.15b 47.69±1.95
80 km 50.90±0.55b 16.86±0.41a 16.55±0.30a 23.67±0.31a 44.54±0.98
160 km 51.54±0.56b 16.09±0.31a 16.92±0.26a 23.36±0.32a 46.46±0.59
240 km 50.02±0.40b 17.32±0.34a 17.22±0.38a 24.47±0.34a 44.82±0.89
Crating Densities
10 birds/crate 49.96±0.43b 17.53±0.32a 16.58±0.24 24.15±0.30 43.433±0.65b
12 birds/crate 50.50±0.55ab 16.53±0.38ab 17.25±0.38 23.94±0.39 46.23±0.91a
15 birds/crate 52.01±0.44a 16.20±0.33b 16.86±0.31 23.41±0.32 46.16±0.80a
p-value
Distance <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0106 <0.0001 0.1705
Crating Density 0.0121 0.0255 0.3287 0.2890 0.0245
Interaction <0.0001 0.0001 0.0058 0.0001 0.0272
Open in a new tab

Note: Different alphabets (a, b, c) on means showing significant differences (P<0.05) among treatment groups (Mean±S.E.M.)

The meat marination showed a significantly higher (P<0.05) marinade uptake (%) in the bird slaughtered on farm without any transportation. Whereas, a gradual decrease in marinate uptake % was observed with the increase in transportation distance (Table 3). On the other hand, the marinade retention was significantly higher (P<0.05) in birds transported for 240 km and decreased gradually with decrease in transportation distance. The cooking losses % in raw meat was found to be significantly higher in birds transported up to 80 km, followed by those in the control group and slaughtered after 160 km transportation, and lowest in those transported up to 240 km. In the marinated breast meat, the birds in the control group had the highest cooking losses while those in 240 km had the lowest (Table 3). Among different crating densities, marinade uptake % was non-significantly different (P>0.05), but marinade retention % and cooking yield %, both in raw and marinated breast meat, were found to be the highest in birds transported at 10 birds per crate density and lowest in those transported at 15 birds per crate density. The interactions showed significant differences among all treatments.

Table 3. Meat marination, cooking, and shear force as affected by transportation distance and crating density.

Treatments MU1
%		 MR2
%		 Cooking loss (%) Cooking yield (%) Shear Force (N/cm2)
Raw Marinated Raw Marinated Raw Marinated
Distance
0 Km 20.02±1.69a 95.34±0.25c 12.23±0.47b 23.07±0.36a 87.77±0.47a 88.01±0.91b 11.71±0.36a 8.88±0.07a
80 Km 15.68±0.72b 96.66±0.39b 13.66±0.48a 15.86±0.52b 86.34±0.48b 94.04±0.58a 10.27±0.48b 7.41±0.18bc
160 Km 13.34±0.57c 97.42±0.22ab 12.04±0.38b 16.05±0.45b 87.96±0.38a 92.68±0.56a 10.66±0.37ab 7.97±0.21b
240 Km 11.21±0.24d 97.74±0.19a 10.82±0.35b 14.28±0.34c 89.18±0.35a 93.17±0.45a 9.03±0.15c 7.33±0.15c
Crating density
10 birds/crate 13.12±0.63 97.84±0.19a 11.02±0.42b 14.83±0.37 88.98±0.42a 94.22±0.31a 9.44±0.26 7.16±0.20b
12 birds/crate 13.55±0.85 96.78±0.43b 12.91±0.55a 16.02±0.38 87.09±0.55b 92.22±0.21b 10.37±0.32 7.62±0.21ab
15 birds/crate 13.57±0.60 97.20±0.15ab 12.59±0.37a 15.34±0.61 87.41±0.37b 93.44±0.80ab 10.16±0.54 7.93±0.11a
p-value
Distance <0.0001 0.0002 0.0001 <0.0001 0.0001 <0.0001 0.0010 0.0001
Density 0.8783 0.0367 0.0108 0.2061 0.0108 0.0274 0.2155 0.0135
Interaction <0.0001 0.0003 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.006 <0.0001
Open in a new tab

Note: Different alphabets (a, b, c) on means showing significant differences (P<0.05) among treatment groups (Mean±S.E.M.)

Marinated: Breast marinated with 4% brine solution for 15 minutes

1

MU: Marinade uptake (% of water absorbed by breast meat during marination)

2

MR: Marinade retention (% of water retained by breast during 24 h storage at chilling temperature)

Shear force (N/cm2) in raw and marinated breast meat was found to be significantly higher in the control group and lowest in those transported up to 240 km (Table 3). Among different crating densities, non-significant differences were observed among different treatments for raw meat shear force. Birds transported at 15 birds per crate density had the highest shear force for marinated meat and those having 10 birds per crate had the lowest (Table 3).

Discussion

Results revealed that the initial pH of the meat was significantly higher (P<0.05) in birds that were slaughtered on farm compared to the rest of the treatments. The pre-slaughter cold stress and struggle in birds may have resulted in the production of more lactic acid before slaughtering and a relatively lower initial pH of the meat (Lee et al., 1976; Debut et al., 2005). Similarly, Yalçin and Güler (2012) also reported lower initial pH in birds transported for longer journeys, that is, 6.53 compared to those transported for relatively shorter periods with a pH of 6.58, but the differences were non-significant (P>0.05) among treatments. The pH at 2 h postmortem was significantly higher in all transported groups compared to those in the control group. The findings revealed a lower rate of pH fall in birds subjected to transportation compared to the control group. Furthermore, the ultimate pH was higher in birds transported up to 240 km (Table 1). It has been reported that during rigor mortis development, substrates such as glycogen and glucose are converted into lactate, which accumulates to acidify the meat (Price and Schweigert, 1987). The amount of glycogen in muscle will determine the ultimate pH of the meat (Lawrie, 1998). Therefore, due to a significant decrease in the muscle glycogen reserves with the stress associated to the length of journey (Lin et al., 2004) and increase in feed withdrawal period (Nijdam et al., 2004), the ultimate pH of transported birds was higher than the control group. Similarly, a significant increase in the pH of the meat with the increase in the length of transportation journey was also reported in many studies (Zhang et al., 2009; Yalçin and Güler, 2012). However, crating densities had no effect on the PS pH of the meat. Similarly, Delezie et al. (2007) also reported no effect of different crating densities on ultimate pH. However, significant differences were observed in the interaction of transportation distance and crating density (Table 1). The lower number of birds in each crate during the winter season resulted in cold stress in birds due to relatively less metabolic heat accumulation (Watts et al., 2011). Therefore, the struggle to maintain body temperature combined with the long transportation journey resulted in relatively higher pHu of these treatments. Similarly, Dadgar et al. (2012) also reported significantly higher pHu in treatments kept at low ambient temperature before slaughter.

Color is one of the most important sensorial characteristics influencing the acceptability or rejection of the meat (Fletcher, 2002). In the meat color characteristic observed at 24 h postmortem, the birds transported for various distances had significantly lower lightness and higher redness, yellowness, and chroma compared to birds slaughtered on farm without transportation (Table 2). Previous studies classified the meat with the aforementioned conditions as dark meat (Barbut et al., 2005; Bianchi et al., 2007). The color development in meat is dependent on denaturation of muscle proteins due to pHu and rate of pH fall (Lawrie, 1998). The low pHu (<6) of meat will result in greater lightness (L*) due to an increase in scattering of light while higher pHu (≥6) will lead to darker meat (low L*) due to less light scattering (Swatland, 1994; Barbut, 1997; Barbut et al., 2005). Similarly, in the present trial, the longer transportation has probably resulted in depletion of glycogen reserves and higher pHu of the meat causing darker meat color (Owens and Sams, 2000; Lin et al., 2004). Our findings are supported by several previous studies (Yaçgin and Güler, 2012; dos Santos et al., 2017) that also reported lower lightness and higher redness in birds transported for long distances. Among different crating densities, the birds transported with crating density of 10 birds per crate had the lowest lightness and higher redness compared to the other treatments (Table 2). Although there is lack of published data regarding effect of winter crating densities on meat quality, it is likely that the birds transported at lower crating densities during winter experienced relatively higher chilling effects compared to those transported with relatively higher crating densities. In agreement with the findings of the present study, Petracci et al. (2004) reported darker (low L*) breast meat in birds transported during the winter season compared to summer. Similarly, Dadgar et al. (2012) also reported higher redness in meat of birds exposed to lower crating temperatures. Similarly, Bianchi et al. (2006) also reported higher redness and saturation of meat kept for longer periods in crates at relatively lower temperatures. Moreover, Adzitey and Nurul (2011) reported that chronic stress can cause to dark-firm-dry (DFD)-like conditions in poultry.

The ability of meat to hold water is one of the most important parameters related to processor's economics and consumer perception of meat. The results of the present experiment revealed that the drip loss (%) and cooking loss (%) of raw and marinated breast meat were significantly higher in the control group and lowest in birds transported 240 km (Table 1, 3). Cooking yield was found to be higher in birds transported compared to the control group. Different crating densities had non-significant differences for drip loss % and marinated breast cooking loss %. However, the raw meat cooking loss was higher in the birds transported with 12 and 15 birds per crate compared to the control group (Table 3). The cooking yield was higher in the birds transported at 10 birds per crate. The water binding capacity of proteins and release of water from muscles are dependent on the isoelectric point of the meat, that is, the pH at which there is no net charge on muscle proteins (Offer and Knight, 1988; Le Bihan-Duval et al., 2010), which has been reported to be approximately 5.5 (Swatland, 1994). The farther the muscle pH from the isoelectric point, the higher the net charge on the proteins will be and more intracellular spaces will be available for water (Van Laack et al., 2000; Huff-Lonergan and Lonergan, 2005). Similarly, the birds in the control group had lower pHu and higher losses % (Table 1, 3). The low transportation crating densities may have resulted in cold stress in broilers due to relatively lower metabolic heat production. These two factors therefore interact in such a way that the longer transportation of broilers under lower numbers of birds per crate resulted in depletion of muscle glycogen, an increase in the pHu of the meat associated with an increase in water binding capacity and a reduction in drip loss %, particularly in colder environments (Zhang et al., 2009; Dadgar et al., 2012; Sowinska et al., 2013). Similarly, dos Santos et al. (2017) compared two transportation distances (15 and 90 km) in two different seasons (Rainy: 25°C+67% RH and Dry: 19°C+44% RH) in Brazil and reported higher pHu and lower drip losses in birds subjected to long-term transportation in both seasons. Furthermore, Yalçin and Güler (2012) reported a significant decrease in meat thawing and cooking loss % with the increase in transportation distance from 65 to 165 km in Turkey. Delezie et al. (2007) reported no effect of different crating densities on drip loss of meat.

The present experiment showed significantly (P<0.05) higher marinade uptake in the meat of birds slaughtered on farm without transporting, whereas marinade uptake was lowest in birds transported for 240 km (Table 3). However, non-significant differences were observed within different crating densities. Reduction in marinade uptake with the increase in transportation distance may be due to higher WHC of meat with higher pHu (Le Bihan-Duval et al., 2001), as shown in Table 1. The muscle-bound water content will be higher in meat having lower drip losses and there will be less space for new water molecules to add to muscle structure during marination. Furthermore, the results of marinade retention % also confirm the above-mentioned findings. The higher (P<0.05) marinade retention observed in longer transportation birds may be due to low pHu, which increases the water binding capacity of meat (Van Laack et al., 2000; Huff-Lonergan and Lonergan, 2005). Owens and Sams (2000) also reported that 3 h transportation of male turkeys caused a significant increase in breast pH and marinade retention and reduction in cooking losses. Among different crating densities, the higher marinade retention in birds transported at lower crating densities could be attributed to chilling/cold stress due to lack of metabolic heat accumulation inside crates. The cold stressed birds had relatively higher ultimate pH (as shown in Table 1) and WHC (Dadgar et al., 2012). However, no previous studies have focused on the effect of crating densities on marinade retention, but an increase in water retention capacity of meat in birds transported at low ambient temperature has been reported by Bianchi et al. 2007.

A gradual decrease in shear force (N/cm2) was observed with the increase in transportation distance (Table 3). Lower pHu in the control group may have caused inhibition of proteolytic enzymes resulting in more drip loss % and higher shear force (Khan and Cohen, 1977). Similar findings were also reported by dos Santos et al. (2017), who observed a significant decrease in shear force with the increase in transportation distance of broilers. Our experiment revealed an increase in shear force of broilers at a transportation distance of 160 km compared to 80 and 240 km. Similarly, Ehinger (1977) also reported that broiler meat tenderness and WHC were reduced after 2 h of transportation but improved after 4 h of transportation. Among different crating densities, the shear force of marinated breast meat was higher in the birds transported at 15 birds per crate (Table 3). The differences in marinade retention in different crating densities (Table 3) may have resulted in variation in shear force of marinated breast samples only. The treatments with higher marinade retention showed lower shear force (Table 3). A similar decrease in meat shear force due to the enrichment of muscle water content was also reported by Silva et al. (2011).

The current study demonstrated that transportation of broilers is associated with economic losses due to depression in meat quality and physical appearance. However, the cooking characteristics of the birds transported for longer distance during winter were improved. Thus, the meat from birds subjected to long-term transportation can be used for further processing operations. Similarly, the birds transported at crating density of 15 birds per crate had better physical appearance and those transported at 10 birds per crate had better yield and tenderness. Thus, transportation at a crating density of 12 birds per crate (0.042 m2/ bird) during the winter season is recommended for producing meat with better physical appearance, yield, and tenderness.

Acknowledgments

The authors express thanks and appreciation to Birds Inn Poultry for allowing on-farm experimentation and Ms. Aisha Shoukat and Mr. Muhammad Waseem (Seasons Foods Pvt. Ltd.) for making necessary arrangements regarding transportation of birds.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors certify that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adzitey F, Nurul H. Pale soft exudative (PSE) and dark firm dry (DFD) meats: Causes and measures to reduce these incidences-a mini review. International Food Research Journal, 18: 11-20. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbosa filho JAD, Vieira FMC, Fonseca BHF, Silva IJO, Garcia DB, Hildebrand A. Poultry transport microclimate analysis through enthalpy comfort index (ECI): A seasonal assessment. In: Livestock Environment VIII, Iguassu Falls, Brazil: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbut S. Problem of pale soft exudative meat in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 38: 355-358. 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbut S, Zhang L, Marcone M. Effects of pale, normal, and dark chicken breast meat on microstructure, extractable proteins, and cooking of marinated fillets. Poultry Science, 84: 797-802. 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bianchi M, Petracci M, Cavani C. The influence of genotype, market live weight, transportation, and holding conditions prior to slaughter on broiler breast meat color. Poultry Science, 85: 123-128. 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bianchi M, Petracci M, Sirri F, Folegatti E, Franchini A, Meluzzi A. The influence of the season and market class of broiler chickens on breast meat quality traits. Poultry Science, 86: 959-963. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CIE. Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE). Colourimetry: Official recommendations of the international commission on illumination. Bureau Central de la Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. Publication CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1) Paris, France: 1976. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dadgar S, Lee E, Leer T, Burlinguette N, Classen H, Crowe T, Shand P. Effect of microclimate temperature during transportation of broiler chickens on quality of the pectoralis major muscle. Poultry Science, 89: 1033-1041. 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dadgar S, Crowe TG, Classen HL, Watts JM, Shand PJ. Broiler chicken thigh and breast muscle responses to cold stress during simulated transport before slaughter. Poultry Science, 91: 1454-1464. 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Debut M, Berri C, Arnould C, Guemené D, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Baéza E, Jehl N, Jégo Y, Beaumont C, Le Bihan-Duval E. Behavioural and physiological responses of three chicken breeds to pre-slaughter shackling and acute heat stress. British Poultry Science, 46: 527-535. 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Delezie E, Swennen Q, Buyse J, Decuypere E. The effect of feed withdrawal and crating density in transit on metabolism and meat quality of broilers at slaughter weight. Poultry Science, 86: 1414-1423. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. dos Santos VM, Dallago BSL, Racanicci AMC, Santana AP, Bernal FEM. Effects of season and distance during transport on broiler chicken meat. Poultry Science, 96: 4270-4279. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ehinger F. The influence of starvation and transportation on the carcass quality of broilers. In: The Quality of Poultry Meat (Scholtyssek S. eds.). pp. 117-124. European Poultry Federation, Munich, Germany: 1977. [Google Scholar]
  14. Elrom K. Handling and transportation of broilers-welfare, stress, fear and meat quality. Part IV: Handling of broilers. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 55: 121-125. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fletcher DL. Poultry Meat Quality. World's Poultry Science Journal, 58: 131-145. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregory NG. Preslaughter handling, stunning and slaughter. Meat Science, 36: 45-56. 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guarnieri PD, Soares AL, Olivo R, Schneider JP, Macedo RM, Ida EI, Shimokomaki M. Preslaughter handling with water shower spray inhibits PSE (Pale, Soft, Exudative) broiler breast meat in a commercial plant. Biochemical and ultrastructural observations. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 28: 269-277. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Honikel KO. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science, 49: 447-457. 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan S. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of post-mortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Science, 71: 194-204. 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kannan G, Heath JL, Wabeck CJ, Souza MCP, Howe JC, Mench JA. Effects of crating and transport on stress and meat quality characteristics in broilers. Poultry Science, 76: 523-529. 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan AW, Cohen DC. Rapid estimation of muscle proteins in beef-vegetable protein mixtures. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 25: 236-238. 1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lawrie RA. The conversion of muscle to meat. In: Lawrie's Meat Science. 6th ed. pp. 96-118. Woodhead Publishing Ltd. Cambridge, UK: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  23. Le Bihan-Duval E, Berri C, Baéza E, Millet N, Beaumont C. Estimation of the genetic parameters of meat characteristics and of their genetic correlations with growth and body composition in an experimental broilers line. Poultry Science, 80: 839-843. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee YB, Hargus GL, Hagberg EC, Forsythe RH. Effect of antemortem environmental temperatures on post-mortem glycolysis and tenderness in excised broilers breast muscle. Journal of Food Science, 41: 1466-1469. 1976. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin H, Decuypere E, Buyse J. Oxidative stress induced by corticosterone administration in broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus): 1. Chronic exposure. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology, 139: 737-744. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Minka NS, Ayo JO. Effect of wet-cold weather transportation conditions on thermoregulation and the development of accidental hypothermia in pullets under tropical conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60: 373-380. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mitchell M, Kettlewell PJ. Transport and handling. In: Measuring and auditing broiler welfare (Weeks C, Butterworth A. eds.). pp. 145-160. CAB International. Wallingford, UK: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Moran ET, Jr, Bilgili SE. Influence of Broiler live haul on carcass quality and further processing yields. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 4: 13-22. 1995. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nijdam E, Arens P, Lambooij E, Decuypere E, Stegeman JA. Factors influencing bruises and mortality of broilers during catching, transport, and lairage. Poultry Science, 83: 1610-1615. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Offer G, Knight P. The structural basis of water-holding in meat. In: Developments in Meat Science (Lawrie RA. eds.). pp. 63-243. Elsevier Applied Sciences, London: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  31. Orlic D, Kapetanov M, Potkonjak D, Stojanovic D. The influence of feed withdrawal and transportation on weight loss, mortality rate and carcass quality in broiler chickens at slaughter. Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 40: 512-516. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. Owens CM, Sams AR. The influence of transport on turkey meat quality. Poultry Science, 79: 1204-1207. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Petracci M, Fletcher DL, Northcutt JK. The effect of holding temperature on live shrink, processing yield, and breast meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 80: 670-675. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Petracci M, Betti M, Bianchi M, Cavani C. Color variation and characterization of broiler breast meat during processing in Italy. Poultry Science, 83: 2086-2092. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Price JF, Schweigert BS. The Science of Meat and Meat Products. 3rd ed. Food and Nutrition Press; Westport, CT: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  36. SAS Institute SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Release 9.4. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC 27513, USA: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Savenije B, Lambooij E, Gerritzen MA, Venema K, Korf J. Effects of feed deprivation and transport on preslaughter blood metabolites, early postmortem muscle metabolites, and meat quality. Poultry Science, 81: 699-708. 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sowińska J, Wójcik A, Pomianowski JF, Chorąży Ł, Mituniewicz T, Witkowska D, Piotrowska J, Kwiatkowska-Stenzel A, Czaplińska B, Kuczyńska P. Effects of different variants of pre-slaughter transport on body weight loss and meat quality in broiler chickens. Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 69: 420-423. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Swatland HJ. The conversion of muscle to meat. In: Structure and Development of Meat Animals and Poultry. Technomic Publishing Co. Inc. Lancaster, PA, USA: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  40. Van Laack RLJM, Liu CH, Smith MO, Loveday HD. Characteristics of pale, soft, exudative broilers breast meat. Poultry Science, 79: 1057-1061. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Warriss PD, Kestin SC, Brown SN, Knowles TG, Wilkins LJ, Edwards JE, Austin SD, Nicol CJ. The depletion of glycogen stores and indices of dehydration in transported broilers. British Veterinary Journal, 149: 391-398. 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Watts JM, Graff LJ, Strawford ML, Crowe TG, Burlinguette NA, Classen HL, Shand PJ. Heat and moisture production by broilers during simulated cold weather transport. Poultry Science, 90: 1890-1899. 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Whiting T, Mairead ED, Rasali DP. Warm weather transport of broiler chickens in Manitoba. II. Truck management factors associated with death loss in transit to slaughter. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 48: 148-154. 2007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yalçin S, Güler HC. Interaction of transport distance and body weight on preslaughter stress and breast meat quality of broilers. British Poultry Science, 53: 175-182. 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang L, Yue HY, Zhang HJ, Xu L, Wu SG, Yan HJ. Transport stress in broilers: I. Blood metabolism, glycolytic potential, and meat quality. Poultry Science, 88: 2033-2041. 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Japan Poultry Science Association

RESOURCES