Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 May 26;10:8803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65140-8

Author Correction: Quantified forces between HepG2 hepatocarcinoma and WA07 pluripotent stem cells with natural biomaterials correlate with in vitro cell behavior

Riina Harjumäki 1,2, Robertus Wahyu N Nugroho 1, Xue Zhang 1, Yan-Ru Lou 2, Marjo Yliperttula 2,3, Juan José Valle-Delgado 1,, Monika Österberg 1,
PMCID: PMC7248075  PMID: 32451383

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-019-43669-7, published online 14 May 2019

This Article contains two errors in the Discussion section under the subheading ‘Effect of material properties on the cell interactions’.

“In accordance with previous findings measured with a different method and other cell types74, we observed that the un-normalized adhesion of a polysaccharide with cells was very weak, only about 2 nJ for WA07 and 2.7 nJ for HepG2 after 30 s in contact (Table S1e,f)”

should read:

“In accordance with previous findings measured with a different method and other cell types74, we observed that the un-normalized adhesion of a polysaccharide with cells was very weak, only about 1.6 fJ for WA07 and 2.7 fJ for HepG2 after 30 s in contact (Table S1e,f)”.

Secondly,

“The corresponding un-normalized adhesion values for LN-521 interactions were 3.8 nJ for WA07 and 33 nJ for HepG2 (Table S1e,f)”

should read:

“The corresponding un-normalized adhesion values for LN-521 interactions were 3.8 fJ for WA07 and 33 fJ for HepG2 (Table S1e,f)”.

Additionally, the Supplementary Information that accompanies this Article contains errors in Table S1, S2 and S3.

In Table S1, the units of adhesion energy are incorrectly given as nJ instead of fJ. Additionally, three values of adhesion energy for CNF in panels (b), (d) and (f) are incorrect.

In Table S2, two values of radius are incorrect for CNF in panel (a) and Col I in panel (b).

In Table S3, the units of adhesion energy are incorrectly given as nJ instead of fJ.

The correct Tables S1, S2 and S3 appear below as Tables 13, respectively.

Table 2.

Radii (µm) of the used colloidal probes for force measurements between HepG2 (a) and WA07 (b) cells and collagen I (Col I), collagen IV (Col IV), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and laminin-521 (LN-521).

a b
HepG2 Col I 13.0 – 19.2 WA07 Col I 14.7 – 17.6
Col IV 13.5 – 14.4 Col IV 12.2
CNF 14.7 CNF 10.3
LN-521 14.6 LN-521 8.2 – 10.2

Table 1.

Adhesion energies and maximum pull-off forces for HepG2 (a,c,e) and WA07 (b,d,f) cell interactions with collagen I (Col I), collagen IV (Col IV), cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), and laminin-521 (LN-521) at contact times of 1, 10 and 30 seconds. Mean values and standard errors of the mean (SEM) are shown.

a HepG2 – 1 s contact b WA07 – 1 s contact
Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m) Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m)
Col I 37 0.168 0.027 2.54 0.051 0.008 Col I 10 0.060 0.008 0.88 0.016 0.002
Col IV 21 0.319 0.042 4.32 0.074 0.008 Col IV 20 0.026 0.004 0.32 0.013 0.002
CNF 24 0.122 0.026 1.79 0.085 0.012 CNF 48 0.098 0.012 1.00 0.032 0.002
LN-521 23 0.94 0.14 13.7 0.199 0.025 LN-521 48 0.231 0.038 2.19 0.053 0.007
c HepG2 – 10 s contact d WA07 – 10 s contact
Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m) Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m)
Col I 29 0.213 0.019 3.24 0.069 0.007 Col I 11 0.051 0.012 0.75 0.015 0.003
Col IV 13 0.374 0.056 5.08 0.090 0.010 Col IV 21 0.075 0.013 0.91 0.030 0.004
CNF 24 0.153 0.030 2.25 0.097 0.014 CNF 44 0.130 0.016 1.33 0.044 0.004
LN-521 20 1.15 0.14 16.8 0.240 0.027 LN-521 29 0.317 0.042 3.14 0.066 0.006
e HepG2 – 30 s contact f WA07 – 30 s contact
Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m) Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m)
Col I 22 0.249 0.028 3.90 0.074 0.006 Col I 12 0.207 0.026 3.04 0.039 0.005
Col IV 11 0.384 0.087 5.27 0.090 0.014 Col IV 22 0.072 0.011 0.87 0.027 0.003
CNF 26 0.182 0.043 2.68 0.045 0.014 CNF 46 0.160 0.026 1.64 0.055 0.006
LN-521 18 2.26 0.20 33.0 0.482 0.035 LN-521 27 0.379 0.041 3.76 0.100 0.016

Table 3.

Adhesion energies and maximum pull-off forces for HepG2 cell interactions with uncoated, APTES-coated, and PEI-coated glass probes after 1 s (a), 10 s (b), and 30 s (c) contact times. The radii of used colloidal probes (µm) are presented in (d). Mean values and standard errors of the mean (SEM) are shown.

a HepG2 – controls, 1 s contact b HepG2 – controls, 10 s contact
Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m) Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m)
Glass 18 0.023 0.007 0.36 0.011 0.002 Glass 17 0.030 0.007 0.46 0.015 0.002
APTES 12 0.043 0.008 0.56 0.018 0.002 APTES 6 0.090 0.042 1.18 0.042 0.013
PEI 7 0.66 0.19 7.22 0.150 0.048 PEI 5 0.45 0.19 4.88 0.086 0.027
c HepG2 – controls, 30 s contact d Radii (µm) of control probes
Number of force curves analyzed Normalized adhesion energy (nJ/m) SEM (nJ/m) Adhesion energy (fJ) Maximum pull-off force (mN/m) SEM (mN/m)
Glass 15 0.083 0.020 1.30 0.032 0.005 HepG2 Glass 15.6
APTES 7 0.172 0.026 2.24 0.124 0.026 APTES 13.1-13.5
PEI 7 1.14 0.32 12.5 0.31 0.11 PEI 11.0-13.4

Contributor Information

Juan José Valle-Delgado, Email: juanjose.valledelgado@aalto.fi.

Monika Österberg, Email: monika.osterberg@aalto.fi.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES