Boronic acids are tremendously useful building blocks for organic synthesis.1 However, to avoid incompatibilities with most synthetic reagents, it is typically necessary to introduce the boronic acid group just prior to its utilization. Because most of the methods for achieving this have limited functional group tolerance, accessing structurally complex boronic acids can be very challenging. A variety of sterically bulky boronic esters are more compatible with synthetic reagents than their boronic acid counterparts.2 However, liberation of the boronic acid usually requires harsh conditions that can be incompatible with complex substrates. Trifluoroborate salts can in many cases serve as highly effective surrogates for boronic acids.3 These compounds are also stable to a variety of common reaction conditions and benchtop storage, thus providing novel access to many important organoboranes.3,4 However, a lack of compatibility with chromatography can significantly limit the utility of trifluoroborate salts in the multistep synthesis of structurally and/or stereochemically complex building blocks.
In addition to being unreactive under anhydrous cross-coupling conditions, we have recently reported that N-methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) boronates5 are universally compatible with chromatography, exceptionally stable to benchtop storage, and easily hydrolyzed using mild conditions to liberate the corresponding boronic acids.6,7 MIDA boronates thus represent a potentially general building block platform with distinct advantages over boronic acids and other surrogates. Greatly expanding access to these materials, we herein report the discovery that MIDA boronates are compatible with a wide range of common synthetic reagents. As demonstrated with the total synthesis of (+)-crocacin C, this finding now makes it possible to reliably transform simple B-containing starting materials into structurally complex boronic acid building blocks via multistep synthesis pathways (Scheme 1a).
Scheme 1.
Due to a lack of the p-orbital that is typically involved in the reactivity of boronic acids, we anticipated that pyramidalized MIDA boronates might be relatively stable to some mild reagents. We first explored the compatibility of the model substrate p-hydroxymethylphenyl MIDA boronate 1a to a range of oxidants and found the conditions of Swern afforded the desired benzaldehyde 2 in good yield (Scheme 1b). PDC, TPAP/NMO, and Dess-Martin periodinane were also well-tolerated. Expecting to identify the limits of this stability, we exposed MIDA boronate 1a to the very strongly acidic and oxidizing Jones conditions (H2SO4/CrO3). However, we were surprised to find a 90% yield of benzoic acid 3. The corresponding boronic acid 1b, pinacol boronic ester 1c, 1,8-diaminonaphthalene adduct8 1d, trifluoroborate salt4 1e, and N-methyldiethanolamine boronate9,10 1f all decomposed under Jones conditions.8
To gain understanding of the dramatic difference in reactivity for the structurally related MIDA (1a) and N-methyldiethanolamine (1f) adducts, we carried out single crystal X-ray analysis of both complexes which revealed no major differences in bond lengths, bond angles, or tetrahedral character at the two boron centers (Supporting Information). In contrast, and consistent with studies of related complexes,5,10 variable temperature NMR of a solution of 1f in d6-DMSO revealed coalescence of the diastereotopic methylene protons of the diethanol-amine backbone upon heating from 23 to 60 °C, while the same experiment with the MIDA boronate 1a yielded no coalescence upon heating to 150 °C. These data are consistent with the conclusion that the N→B bond in 1f is dynamic which renders the boron p-orbital and nitrogen lone pair vulnerable to attack, whereas in the MIDA boronate 1a these potentially reactive sites are kinetically not accessible at <150 °C.
Encouraged by the unique stability of the MIDA boronate group to these strongly acidic and oxidative conditions, we explored its compatibility with a variety of common reagents (Scheme 1b). Remarkably, even TfOH (pKa −14) was tolerated, enabling the acid-catalyzed p-methoxybenzylation of 1a to yield 4, which was then smoothly debenzylated with DDQ to regenerate 1a. Alcohol 1a was also reversibly silated under standard conditions (1a → 5; 5 → 1a) or converted into the bifunctional halo MIDA boronate 6 upon treatment with PPh3/I2. The compatibility with soft nucleophiles suggested by the latter encouraged us to explore a series of C-C bond-forming reactions with benzaldehyde 2. The Evans aldol, Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefination, and Takai olefination reactions were all found to be well-tolerated. Aldehyde 2 was also reductively aminated to form 10 or reduced with NaBH4 to regenerate 1a.
In the course of these studies, we found that MIDA boronates are tolerant to a variety of workup/extraction solutions including water, pH 7 buffer, brine, aq. HCl, aq. NH4Cl, aq. NaS2O3, and aq. hydrogen peroxide at pH 6. Surprisingly, saturated aqueous NaHCO3 is also well-tolerated, except in the presence of alcoholic solvents. Despite this widespread stability, MIDA boronates 1–5 and 7–10 were all conveniently transformed into the corresponding boronic acids using mild aqueous base (aq. NaOH/THF, 23 °C, 10 min, or aq. NaHCO3/MeOH, 23 °C, 3.5 h, Supporting Information).6–8 Consistent with a focused sensitivity to hard nucleophiles, we found that MIDA boronates are generally incompatible with LiAlH4, DIBAL, TBAF, and a variety of metal alkoxides.11 Importantly, compounds 1a–10 are all crystalline solids, compatible with chromatography, and stable to long-term benchtop storage under air.
Inspired by the simplicity and flexibility of peptide coupling, we recently reported a potentially general strategy for small molecule synthesis involving the iterative cross-coupling (ICC) of MIDA protected haloboronic acids.6–8 In an ideal ICC-based pathway, building blocks having all of the required functional groups preinstalled in the correct oxidation state and with the desired stereochemical relationships are brought together using only stereospecific cross-coupling reactions. We recognized that the newfound reagent compat-ibilities of MIDA boronates should enable structurally and/or stereochemically complex haloboronic acid building blocks to be readily prepared from simple MIDA boronate starting materials via multistep synthesis. To evaluate this potential, we targeted the total synthesis of the natural product (+)-crocacin C12 (11) via ICC.
Retrosynthetic fragmentation of 11 via recursive cross-coupling generates known building blocks 1212b and 14 and the structurally complex, B-protected haloboronic acid 13 (Scheme 2). As shown in Scheme 3, the synthesis of 13 commenced with acrolein MIDA boronate 15, which was prepared from the known boronic acid.13 A Paterson aldol reaction followed by diastereoselective reduction of the resulting β-hydroxyketone12d yielded diol 16. Harnessing a key advantage of MIDA boronates, silica gel chromatography was utilized to remove the small amounts of diastereomeric byproducts that are typically generated during these types of reactions. Permethylation of 16 with Meerwein’s salt and cleavage of the resulting PMB ether using CAN afforded primary alcohol 17. DMP oxidation followed by Takai olefination12d of the resulting aldehyde afforded bifunctional building block 13. Notably, 15, 13, and all intermediates are crystalline solids, compatible with chromatography, and stable to benchtop storage under air. With building block 13 in hand, a CsF/CuI-promoted Stille coupling14 with 12 followed by in situ boronic acid generation15 and Pd/SPhos16-promoted cross-coupling between 18 and 14 completed the synthesis of (+)-crocacin C (Scheme 4). Enabled by the ability to carry a boron functional group through multiple synthetic steps, this ICC-based route is short (nine steps in the longest linear sequence) and readily amenable to analogue synthesis via incorporation of modified building blocks into the same pathway.
Scheme 2.
Scheme 3.
Scheme 4.
As demonstrated herein, the stability of MIDA boronates to a broad range of common reaction conditions and the unique compatibility of these materials with chromatography collectively make it now possible to reliably prepare complex boronic acid building blocks from simple B-containing starting materials17 via multistep synthesis pathways. Because of this and many other highly enabling features,6,7 MIDA boronates represent a uniquely promising platform for the preparation, storage, and utilization of organoborane building blocks in organic synthesis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment.
We gratefully acknowledge the NSF (CAREER 0747778) and the Dreyfus Foundation for financial support, Sigma-Aldrich for gifts of reagents, and S. Wilson for X-ray analysis. M.D.B. is a Beckman Young Investigator.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Procedures, spectral data, spectra, and X-ray crystallographic data (cif) for 1a and 1f. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- (1).Hall DG. Boronic Acids; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Matteson DS; Kandil AA; Soundararajan RJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3964–3969. [Google Scholar]; (b) Matteson DS; Man H-W; Ho OC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4560–4566. [Google Scholar]; (c) Luithle JEA; Pietruszka JJ. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9194–9200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Hilt G; Bolze P Synthesis 2005, 13, 2091–2115. [Google Scholar]; (e) Jin B; Liu Q; Sulikowski GA. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 401–408. [Google Scholar]; (f) Gopalarathnam A; Nelson SG. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 7–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).(a) Molander GA; Ellis N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 275–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Darses S; Genet J-P Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 288–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).(a) Molander GA; Petrillo DE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9634–9635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Molander GA; Ribagorda MJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11148–11149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Molander GA; Petrillo DE. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1795–1798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Molander GA; Gormisky PE; Sandrock DL. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2052–2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Pucheault M; Darses S; Genet J-PJ Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15356–15357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).First synthesis and pioneering physical organic studies of MIDA boronates: Mancilla T; Contreras R; Wrackmeyer BJ. Organomet. Chem. 1986, 307, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Gillis EP; Burke MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6716–6717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Lee SJ; Gray KC; Paek JS; Burke MD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 466–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8). A 1,8-diaminonaphthalene system for oligoarene synthesis:; (a) Noguchi H; Hojo K; Suginome MJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 758–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Noguchi H; Shioda T; Chou C-M; Suginome M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 377–380. 1,8-Diaminonaphthalene boron reagents are stable to aqueous base and deprotected using 2 N aq. H2SO4 for 10–13 h or 5 N aq. HCl for 4–12 h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).(a) Vedso P; Olesen PH; Hoeg-Jensen T. Synlett 2004, n/a, 892–894. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gravel M; Thompson KA; Zak M; Bérube C; Hall DG. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).(a) Psarras TG; Zimmerman HK; Rasiel Y; Weidman H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1962, 655, 48–54. [Google Scholar]; (b) Contreras R; Garcıá C; Mancilla T; Wrackmeyer B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 246, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
- (11).MIDA boronates have been alkylated on the MIDA ligand using >n-BuLi as base at room temperature: Mancilla T; Romo MAC; Delgado LA. Polyhedron 2007, 26, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar]
- (12).(a) Kunze B; Jansen R; Hofle G; Reichenbach HJ. Antibiot. 1994, 47, 881–886. Previous syntheses: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dias LC; de Oliviera LG. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3951–3954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Chakraborty TK; Jayaprakash S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 497–499. [Google Scholar]; (d) Feutrill JT; Lilly MJ; Rizzacasa MA. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3365–3367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Sirasani G; Paul T; rade RB. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6386–6388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Toure BB; Hoveyda HR; Tailor J; Ulaczyk-Lesanko A; Hall DG. Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 466–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Mee SPH; Lee V; Baldwin JE. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1132–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Knapp DM; Gillis EP; Burke MD. Manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
- (16).Barder TE; Walker SD; Martinelli JR; Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4685–4696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17). A large collection of MIDA boronates will soon be commercial. JA8063759.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.