Skip to main content
NASA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NASA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Minor Planet Bull. 2013 Jul-Sep;40(3):129–130.

1727 METTE: A NEW HUNGARIA BINARY

Brian D Warner 1, Robert D Stephens 2
PMCID: PMC7249731  NIHMSID: NIHMS1569909  PMID: 32457949

Abstract

Analysis of CCD photometric observations of the Hungaria asteroid 1727 Mette made in 2013 January shows that the asteroid is a binary system. A bimodal lightcurve for the primary has a period 2.98109 ± 0.00007 h with an amplitude of 0.33 ± 0.01 mag. This makes the primary one of the more elongated objects in the small binary population. The orbital period of the satellite is 20.99 ± 0.02 h. Based on the depth of the mutual events, the satellite-primary diameter ratio is estimated to be Ds/Dp = 0.21 ± 0.02.


The rotation period of the (now known to be) primary of the Hungaria asteroid 1727 Mette had been determined on several previous occasions, e.g., Wisiniewski (1987, 2.63 h), Behrend et al. (2003, 2.981 h), Gandolfi (2009), and Warner (2011, 2.981 h). Other observers have reported periods of 2.4-2.6 h over the years. See the references in the asteroid lightcurve database (LCDB; Warner et al., 2009). None of the previous results seemed to indicate signs of the asteroid having a satellite.

As part of the regular observations of the Hungaria asteroids conducted at the Palmer Divide Observatory since 2005, CCD photometric observations of 1727 Mette were started in 2013 January. In this case, the intent was to provide additional dense lightcurves for modeling the asteroid’s spin axis and shape. Initial observations showed what appeared to be deviations from a 2.98 hour lightcurve (Figure 1). This prompted additional observations so that the primary curve could be well-determined and then subtracted from the overall data set to determine the period of the satellite events (occultations and/or eclipses), i.e., the orbital period.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The lightcurve of 1727 Mette without subtracting the effects of the satellite. The deviations from the overall curve are what lead to additional analysis and discovery of the satellite.

The observations at the Palmer Divide Observatory (PDO) were made using a 0.30-m Schmidt-Cassegrain and SBIG ST-9XE CCD camera. Exposures were 120 seconds and unfiltered. Observations at the Center for Solar System Studies (CS3) were made with a 0.35-m Schmidt-Cassegrain and SBIG STL-1001E. Exposures were also unfiltered and 120 seconds. All images were measured in MPO Canopus. The dual-period feature in that program, based on the FALC algorithm developed by Harris (Harris et al., 1989) was used to subtract one of the periods from the data set in an iterative process until both periods remained stable. Night-to-night calibration of the data was done using the Comp Star Selector feature in MPO Canopus. Catalog magnitudes for the comparison stars were derived from J-K to BVRI formulae developed by Warner (2007) using stars from the 2MASS catalog (Skrutskie et al., 2006). A description of this method was described by Stephens (2008).

The results of the analysis are shown Figures 1-3. Figure 1 shows the full data set before subtracting the effects of the occupation and/or eclipses caused by the satellite. This shows the nature of the deviations that prompted the additional analysis. Figure 1 also demonstrates the usual nature of these events in unprocessed lightcurves: they are not sharp, short-lived, and deep. Instead they extend over a period of an hour or more and somewhat subtle. There are, of course, exceptions, but if an “event” consists of a few data points dropping several tenths of a magnitude and recovering very quickly, it should be viewed with some suspicion and, as always, confirmed with additional observations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The lightcurve of 1727 Mette after subtracting the primary lightcurve. The “dips” at about 0.05 and 0.55 rotation phase are due to occultations or eclipses involving the satellite. The small upward bowing between the events indicates the satellite is slightly elongated.

Figure 2 shows the lightcurve after subtracting the mutual events and so represents the rotation of the primary body. The amplitude of 0.33 mag implies a minimum a/b ratio of about 1.4:1 for a simple triaxial ellipsoid, assuming an equatorial view. This makes it one of the more elongated primaries among the small binary population. Usually, primaries tend to be more spheroidal, showing amplitudes in the range of 0.05 to 0.20 mag.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The lightcurve for 1727 Mette showing only the rotation of the primary. The somewhat large amplitude is unusual for the primary of a small binary system. Most primaries have amplitudes in the range of 0.05-0.20 mag.

Figure 3 shows the mutual events by subtracting the rotation of the primary from the overall data set. The “dips” at 0.05 and 0.55 rotation phase represent an occultation or eclipse. Using the magnitude drop of the shallower of the two, the estimated secondary-primary size ratio is Ds/Dp = 0.21 ± 0.02. The event at 0.05 appears to be total, so this is probably the actual ratio and not a minimum.

Acknowledgements

Funding for observations at the Palmer Divide Observatory is provided by NASA grant NNX10AL35G and by National Science Foundation grant AST-1032896.

Contributor Information

Brian D. Warner, Palmer Divide Observatory, 17995 Bakers Farm Rd., Colorado Springs, CO 80908

Robert D. Stephens, Center for Solar System Studies, Landers, CA USA

References

  1. Behrend R (2003). Observatoire de Geneve web site, http://obswww.unige.ch/~behrend/page_cou.html
  2. Gandolfi D, Cigna M, Fulvio D, and Blanco C (2009). “CCD and photon-counting photometric observations of asteroids carried out at Padova and Catania observatories.” Planet. Space Sci 57, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Skrutskie MF, Cutri RM, Stiening R, Weinberg MD, Schneider S, Carpenter JM, Beichman C, Capps R, Chester T, Elias J, Huchra J, Liebert J, Lonsdale C, Monet DG, Price S, Seitzer P, Jarrett T, Kirkpatrick JD, Gizis JE, Howard E, Evans T, Fowler J, Fullmer L, Hurt R, Light R, Kopan EL, Marsh KA, McCallon HL, Tam R, Van Dyk S, and Wheelock S (2006) “The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).”Astron. J 131, 1163–1183. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stephens RD (2008). “Long Period Asteroids Observed from GMARS and Santana Observatories.” Minor Planet Bul. 37, 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Warner BD (2007). “Initial Results from a Dedicated H-G Project.” Minor Planet Bul. 34, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  6. Warner BD (2011). “Asteroid Lightcurve Analysis at the Palmer Divide Observatory: 2011 March – July.” Minor Planet Bul. 38, 190–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Warner BD, Harris AW, and Pravec P (2009). “The Asteroid Lightcurve Database.” Icarus 202, 134–146. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wisniewski WZ and McMillan RS (1987). “Differential CCD photometry of faint asteroids in crowded star fields and nonphotometric sky conditions.” Astron. J 93, 1264–1267. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES