Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2020 Apr 1;2020(4):pdb.top095844. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top095844

Using the Xenopus Oocyte Toolbox

Kimberly L Mowry 1
PMCID: PMC7250317  NIHMSID: NIHMS1587885  PMID: 31980467

Abstract

The Xenopus oocyte is a unique model system, allowing both the study of complex biological processes within a cellular context through expression of exogenous mRNAs and proteins, and studying the cell, molecular, and developmental biology of the oocyte itself. During oogenesis, Xenopus oocytes grow dramatically in size, with a mature oocyte having a diameter of ~1.3 mm, and become highly polarized, localizing many mRNAs and proteins. Thus, the mature oocyte is a repository of maternal mRNAs and proteins that will direct early embryogenesis prior to zygotic genome transcription. Importantly, the Xenopus oocyte also has the capacity to translate exogenous microinjected RNAs, which has enabled breakthroughs in a wide range of areas including cell biology, developmental biology, molecular biology, and physiology. This series of protocols details procedures for using Xenopus oocytes to study a variety of important biological questions.

Background

The Xenopus oocyte has been called a “living test tube” (de Robertis et al. 1977) and has proven to be an invaluable system for investigating a myriad of biological questions. Research using the Xenopus oocytes has revolutionized the fields of cell and molecular biology, resulting in many “firsts” including, but not limited to: identification of the nucleolus as the site of ribosomal RNA transcription (Brown and Gurdon 1964), isolation of a eukaryotic gene (Birnstiel et al. 1968; Brown and Weber 1968), in situ hybridization (Gall and Pardue 1969), in vivo expression of exogenous mRNA (Gurdon et al. 1971), transcription of a cloned eukaryotic gene (Brown and Gurdon 1977), sequencing of a eukaryotic gene (Fedoroff and Brown 1978), and isolation of a eukaryotic transcription factor (Engelke et al. 1980). The large size of the Xenopus oocyte and the availability of large quantities of oocytes continues to facilitate microinjection approaches to study cellular functions of exogenous proteins, as well as biochemical approaches to study fundamental cellular processes.

Oogenesis

As depicted in Figure 1, oogenesis in Xenopus is divided into six stages (I-VI) based on size and morphology (Dumont 1972). Stage I oocytes are transparent, lacking yolk, and display the first hallmark of polarity along the animal-vegetal (AV) axis; the Balbiani Body, or mitochondrial cloud (Heasman et al. 1984), is present on the vegetal side of the nucleus or germinal vesicle (GV) of stage I oocytes. Oocytes grow dramatically during oogenesis—from 50μm at the beginning of stage I to 1.3 mm by the end of stage VI—with much of this growth due to accumulation of yolk during vitellogenesis, which refers to the uptake of the yolk precursor protein vitellogenin (Wallace and Dumont 1968). Vitellogenesis begins in stage II oocytes and continues through stage V of oogenesis (Dumont 1972). By the end of oogenesis (stage VI) the vegetal yolk mass comprises 70% of total oocyte yolk protein (Danilchik and Gerhart 1987) and 80% of total oocyte protein (Wiley and Wallace 1981). Oocyte pigmentation begins in stage III, with polarization first of the pigment evident in stage IV and increasing through stage VI, such that the animal hemisphere is darkly pigmented in fully-grown oocytes (Dumont 1972).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The six stages (I-VI, from left to right) of oogenesis are depicted. The animal-vegetal (AV) axis is indicated at the right and the stage (st.) is indicated below each oocyte and the nucleus or GV is indicated by a circle. Stage I oocytes range from 50–300μm in diameter; the Balbiani Body is depicted in gray on the vegetal side of the GV, which is in the center. Stage II oocytes are 300–450μm in diameter; light yellow shading in the cytoplasm indicates the beginning of yolk accumulation. Stage III oocytes are 450–600μm in diameter; the accumulating yolk is indicated by yellow shading. Stage IV oocytes are 600–1000μm in diameter; increased yolk accumulation is indicated by yellow shading and the GV is displaced towards the animal hemisphere where accumulating pigment is indicated by brown shading. Stage V oocytes are 1000–1200μm in diameter; increased yolk accumulation is indicated by darker yellow shading and the GV is further displaced towards the animal hemisphere where accumulating pigment is indicated by dark brown shading. Stage VI oocytes are 1200–1300μm in diameter; the yolk in the vegetal hemisphere is indicated by yellow shading and the GV is in the darkly pigmented animal hemisphere. The stages of vitellogenesis (yolk accumulation) are indicated at the bottom: stage I oocytes lack yolk and are pre-vitellogenic, vitellogenesis occurs during stages II-V, and stage VI oocytes are post-vitellogenic.

In protocol “Isolation of Xenopus Oocytes” (Newman et al. 2018) procedures for isolation of various stages of Xenopus oocytes are detailed, and each of the following protocols in this chapter use distinct stages of oogenesis. Protocols “Whole-mount in situ hybridization of Xenopus oocytes” (Bauermeister and Pieler 2018), “Fluorescence in situ hybridization of cryosectioned Xenopus oocytes” (Neil and Mowry 2018), and “Whole-mount immunofluorescence for visualizing endogenous protein and injected RNA in Xenopus oocytes” (Jeschonek and Mowry 2018), use stage II-IV oocytes. Protocol “Isolation and analysis of Xenopus germinal vesicles” (Morgan 2018) uses stage IV-V oocytes, and protocols “Heterologous protein expression in the Xenopus oocyte” (Marchant 2018), “Patch-clamp and perfusion techniques to study ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes” (Zhang and Cui 2018), and “Oocyte host-transfer and maternal mRNA depletion experiments in Xenopus” (Houston 2018) use stage VI oocytes. Protocol “Microinjection of Xenopus Oocytes” (Aguero et al. 2018) describes procedures for microinjecting DNA or RNA molecules into stage VI Xenopus oocytes.

Using Xenopus oocytes to study polarity and early development

During oogenesis, Xenopus oocytes synthesize the large store of maternal mRNAs and proteins that will be necessary to program early embryogenesis until zygotic transcription begins at the mid-blastula transition (Newport and Kirschner 1982). The highly active transcription required for this results in lampbrush chromosomes, which are a topic of the protocol “Isolation and Analysis of Xenopus Germinal Vesicles” (Morgan 2018). Additionally, during oogenesis, a subset of mRNAs are polarized along the AV axis, providing the basis for developmental polarity in the oocyte and patterning in the embryo (King et al. 2005; Medioni et al. 2012). Xenopus oocytes have been an important model system for studying the mechanisms driving mRNA transport and localization (Houston 2013), and several protocols in this chapter are relevant to this topic: Protocol “Whole-mount in situ Hybridization of Xenopus Oocytes” (Bauermeister and Pieler 2018) presents whole-mount in situ hybridization as a technique for spatial analysis of RNA expression in oocytes. Protocol “Whole-mount immunofluorescence for visualizing endogenous protein and injected RNA in Xenopus oocytes” (Jeschonek and Mowry 2018) details techniques for analyzing spatial distribution of both endogenous proteins and microinjected RNAs. Protocol “Fluorescence in situ hybridization of cryosectioned Xenopus oocytes” (Neil and Mowry 2018) describes a FISH approach, combined with cryosectioning, for high-resolution imaging of endogenous RNA distribution in oocytes. Analyzing the contributions of maternally-inherited mRNAs to early embryogenesis is of critical importance in Xenopus and many systems. Protocol “Oocyte host-transfer and maternal mRNA depletion experiments in Xenopus” (Houston 2018) details procedures for using host-transfer techniques to assess effects on embryonic development after manipulating expression of maternal mRNAs in oocytes.

Using Xenopus oocytes to study physiology, cell and molecular biology

Xenopus oocytes have long been an invaluable tool for expression and analysis of heterologous proteins and, as noted above, inspired characterization as a “living test tube” (de Robertis et al. 1977). Proteins produced from mRNA microinjected into the cytoplasm (Gurdon et al. 1971) or DNA microinjected into the nucleus (Mertz and Gurdon 1977) are robustly expressed and appropriately processed and trafficked. The development of in vitro procedures for production of synthetic RNAs (Krieg and Melton 1984) further expanded the versatility and effectiveness of the oocyte as a system for analyzing the function of expressed proteins. Protocol “Microinjection of Xenopus oocytes” (Aguero et al. 2018) provides procedures for microinjection of Xenopus oocytes and protocol “Heterologous protein expression in the Xenopus oocyte” (Marchant 2018) details procedures for nuclear injection of cDNA constructs for expression of heterologous proteins in oocytes. Both of these protocols can be adapted to study any gene of interest. The large size of the oocyte is of particular benefit to electrophysiological approaches to study channel proteins, such as acetylcholine receptors (Miledi et al. 1982) and many others (Dascal 1987). In protocol “Patch-clamp and perfusion techniques to study ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes ”Zhang and Cui (2018) describe the use of Xenopus oocytes to study heterologously-expressed ion channels. The protocol can be applied to study a variety of ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors. Together, these protocols provide a toolbox for using Xenopus oocytes to carry out functional studies for an investigator’s protein of interest.

Summary

For many decades, the Xenopus oocyte has proven to be an invaluable system for addressing fundamental biological questions. The protocols described in this chapter will assist investigators in continuing to use and study this remarkable cell.

Acknowledgments

I thank S.E. Cabral and L.C. O’Connell for comments on the manuscript. Work in my laboratory using Xenopus oocytes is supported by a grant (GM071049) from the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. Aguero T, Newman K, King ML. 2018. Microinjection of Xenopus oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot096974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauermeister D, Pieler T. 2018. Whole-mount in situ hybridization of Xenopus oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot097014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birnstiel M, Speirs J, Purdom I, Jones K, Loening UE. 1968. Properties and composition of the isolated ribosomal DNA satellite of Xenopus laevis. Nature 219: 454–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown DD, Gurdon JB. 1964. Absence of ribosomal RNA synthesis in the anucleolate mutant of Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 51: 139–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown DD, Gurdon JB. 1977. High-fidelity transcription of 5S DNA injected into Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74: 2064–2068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown DD, Weber CS. 1968. Gene linkage by RNA-DNA hybridization. II. Arrangement of the redundant gene sequences for 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol 34: 681–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Danilchik MV, Gerhart JC. 1987. Differentiation of the animal-vegetal axis in Xenopus laevis oocytes. I. Polarized intracellular translocation of platelets establishes the yolk gradient. Dev Biol 122: 101–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dascal N 1987. The use of Xenopus oocytes for the study of ion channels. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 22: 317–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Robertis EM, Gurdon JB, Partington GA, Mertz JE, Laskey RA. 1977. Injected amphibian oocytes: a living test tube for the study of eukaryotic gene transcription? Biochem Soc Symp: 181–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dumont JN. 1972. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol 136: 153–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Engelke DR, Ng SY, Shastry BS, Roeder RG. 1980. Specific interaction of a purified transcription factor with an internal control region of 5S RNA genes. Cell 19: 717–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedoroff NV, Brown DD. 1978. The nucleotide sequence of oocyte 5S DNA in Xenopus laevis. I. The AT-rich spacer. Cell 13: 701–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gall JG, Pardue ML. 1969. Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 63: 378–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gurdon JB, Lane CD, Woodland HR, Marbaix G. 1971. Use of frog eggs and oocytes for the study of messenger RNA and its translation in living cells. Nature 233: 177–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heasman J, Quarmby J, Wylie CC. 1984. The mitochondrial cloud of Xenopus oocytes: the source of germinal granule material. Dev Biol 105: 458–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Houston DW. 2013. Regulation of cell polarity and RNA localization in vertebrate oocytes. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 306: 127–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Houston DW. 2018. Oocyte host-transfer and maternal mRNA depletion experiments in Xenopus. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot096982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeschonek SP, Mowry KL. 2018. Whole-mount immunofluorescence for visualizing endogenous protein and injected RNA in Xenopus oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot097022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. King ML, Messitt TJ, Mowry KL. 2005. Putting RNAs in the right place at the right time: RNA localization in the frog oocyte. Biol Cell 97: 19–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krieg PA, Melton DA. 1984. Functional messenger RNAs are produced by SP6 in vitro transcription of cloned cDNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 7057–7070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marchant JS. 2018. Heterologous protein expression in the Xenopus oocyte. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot096990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Medioni C, Mowry K, Besse F. 2012. Principles and roles of mRNA localization in animal development. Development 139: 3263–3276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mertz JE, Gurdon JB. 1977. Purified DNAs are transcribed after microinjection into Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74: 1502–1506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miledi R, Parker I, Sumikawa K. 1982. Properties of acetylcholine receptors translated by cat muscle mRNA in Xenopus oocytes. EMBO J 1: 1307–1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morgan GT. 2018. Isolation and analysis of Xenopus germinal vesicles. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot096958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neil CR, Mowry K. 2018. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of cryosectioned Xenopus oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot097030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Newman K, Aguero T, King ML. 2018. Isolation of Xenopus oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot095851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Newport J, Kirschner M. 1982. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30: 675–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wallace RA, Dumont JN. 1968. The induced synthesis and transport of yolk proteins and their accumulation by the oocyte in Xenopus laevis. J Cell Physiol 72: Suppl 1:73–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiley HS, Wallace RA. 1981. The structure of vitellogenin. Multiple vitellogenins in Xenopus laevis give rise to multiple forms of the yolk proteins. J Biol Chem 256: 8626–8634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang G, Cui J. 2018. Patch-clamp and perfusion techniques to study ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc: pdb prot099051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES