Abstract
Gap junction channels made of different connexins have distinct permeability to second messengers, which could affect many cell processes, including lens epithelial cell division. Here, we have compared the permeability of IP3 and Ca2+ through channels made from two connexins, Cx43 and Cx50, that are highly expressed in vertebrate lens epithelial cells. Solute transfer was measured while simultaneously monitoring junctional conductance via dual whole-cell/perforated patch clamp. HeLa cells expressing Cx43 or Cx50 were loaded with Fluo-8, and IP3 or Ca2+ were delivered via patch pipette to one cell of a pair, or to a monolayer while fluorescence intensity changes were recorded. Cx43 channels were permeable to IP3 and Ca2+. Conversely, Cx50 channels were impermeable to IP3, while exhibiting high permeation of Ca2+. Reduced Cx50 permeability to IP3 could play a role in regulating cell division and homeostasis in the lens.
Subject terms: Permeation and transport, Ion channel signalling
Introduction
The proper growth and development of vertebrate tissues relies upon chemical communication between adjacent cells. This can result from the activation of cytoplasmic signal transduction cascades by extracellular growth factors to generate second messengers, or can directly occur between adjacent cells through the gap junction channels that link their cytoplasm. Both gap junctional communication and growth factor signaling pathways have been shown to play critical roles in the development and growth of the lens1–9. However, few studies have examined if differential permeability to second messenger molecules by the connexin channels expressed in the lens epithelium, Cx43 and Cx50, could play a role in the specificity of cell-to-cell communication during eye development10–12.
Initial reports assumed that gap junction channels would be relatively non-selective13,14, however connexin-dependent differences in ion and small molecule permeability were subsequently identified15–18. Further studies extended connexin permeation differences to second messenger molecules such as IP3 and cAMP10,19–23. Currently, it is thought that each type of connexin channel has functionally distinct ionic conductance and small molecule permeability19,20,24–26. The importance of permeation differences between connexin channel types in vivo has been suggested by mouse genetic studies showing that loss of one connexin often cannot be compensated for by replacement with another27–32.
Animal models with genetic manipulations of Cx43 and Cx50 have consistently supported this idea28,33–37, and the lens is an excellent model system to explore differential permeability of gap junctions to second messengers. There is a well-established literature on the pathological effects resulting from genetically manipulating the lens connexins in vivo38–41, that can be contrasted with changes in second messenger permeation observed in vitro. Here, we have used a combined patch clamp electrophysiological and fluorescent imaging approach to compare the permeation of IP3 and Ca2+ through Cx43 and Cx50 channels in vitro. We found that Cx43 channels were permeable to both IP3 and Ca2+, whereas channels composed of Cx50 showed undetectable permeability to IP3, but high permeability to Ca2+ ions that was comparable to that of Cx43.
Results
Cx43 channels are permeable to IP3
Permeability of connexin channels to IP3 has been documented in a number of experimental systems, most frequently for channels composed of Cx2621–23,42–44. Many of these studies utilized IP3 mediated ER calcium release45,46 and Ca2+ sensitive fluorescent dyes to detect IP3 permeation through gap junction channels. We analyzed the IP3 permeability of Cx43 channels using cell pairs loaded with the Ca2+ binding dye Fluo-8 (Fig. 1). In all examples shown, cell 1 was patched in whole cell mode and IP3 was added to the pipette solution. Cell 2 was patched in the perforated patch mode to simultaneously measure gap junctional conductance while imaging cell fluorescence (for experimental details see Materials and Methods). Cell fluorescence was initially monitored for 15–40 seconds to establish a baseline, then the whole cell mode with the pipette attached to cell 1 was established to release 500 µM IP3 into the cytoplasm. A rapid spike in fluorescent intensity was observed in cell 1 (red traces), which rapidly attenuated due to the presence of 10 mM EGTA in the pipette solution. For every cell pair expressing Cx43 that we tested (n = 16), cell 2 showed a spike in fluorescent intensity (green traces) between 10 and 40 seconds after IP3 was delivered to cell 1, indicating permeation through Cx43 gap junction channels. In rare cell pairs (Fig. 1C,D), the fluorescent response in the recipient cell showed Ca2+ oscillation, although we cannot conclusively explain why this occurred. In these cases, the first major response was counted as the positive result. In the third cell pair shown (Fig. 1E,F), the concentration of IP3 in the pipette solution was reduced to 250 µM. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean times (± SD) between the fluorescent peaks observed in cell 1 and cell 2 when the IP3 concentration in the pipette solution was varied (16.2 ± 10.6 seconds, n = 9, for 500 μM versus 18.9 ± 11.3 seconds, n = 7 for 250 μM, p = 0.64, student’s t-test). The mean gap junctional conductance (± SD) for all of the Cx43 cell pairs investigated as shown in Fig. 1 was 21 ± 9.7 nS (n = 16).
IP3 cannot permeate Cx50 channels
When we analyzed the IP3 permeability of Cx50 channels using the same method (Fig. 2), a rapid spike in fluorescent intensity was observed in cell 1 (red traces), which rapidly attenuated, just as we had observed for Cx43. In contrast to Cx43, for every cell pair expressing Cx50 that we tested (n = 18), cell 2 never showed any spike in fluorescent intensity (green traces) for up to 220 seconds following IP3 delivery to cell 1, indicating no detectable permeation of this second messenger through Cx50 gap junction channels. In the third cell pair shown (Fig. 2E,F), we directly introduced 500 µM IP3 into cell 2 after monitoring fluorescence for 200 seconds following IP3 release into cell 1. We observed a rapid spike in fluorescent intensity in cell 2 within seconds, demonstrating that cell 2 was capable of responding to IP3, and that the lack of response was due to the absence of its permeation through Cx50 channels. The mean gap junctional conductance (± SD) for all of the Cx50 cell pairs tested as shown in Fig. 2 was 21 ± 11.6 nS (n = 18), the same magnitude of coupling provided by Cx43 channels in the data presented in Fig. 1.
Cx43 and Cx50 channels are permeable to Ca2+
Connexin channels have been shown to be both permeable to and gated by Ca2+44,47–50. For the lens connexins, physiologically relevant changes in the levels of cytoplasmic calcium have been reported to markedly reduce gap junctional coupling51,52. To ensure that differential effects of Ca2+ on conductance of the two channel types did not cause the striking disparity in IP3 permeability observed between Cx43 and Cx50, we examined the Ca2+ permeability and gating of Cx50 using cell pairs loaded with Fluo-8 (Fig. 3). Cell 1 was patched in whole cell mode and 2 mM Ca2+ was added to the pipette solution. Cell 2 was patched in whole cell mode to simultaneously measure gap junctional conductance while continuously imaging Fluo-8 fluorescence. Fluorescence was initially monitored for 10–30 seconds to establish a baseline, then the patch was ruptured under the pipette attached to cell 1 to establish the whole cell mode and to release Ca2+ into the cytoplasm. A rapid rise in fluorescent intensity was observed in cell 1 (red trace), which persisted due to the omission of 10 mM EGTA from the pipette solution. For every cell pair expressing Cx50 that we tested (n = 4), cell 2 showed a rise in fluorescent intensity (green traces) between ~ 5 and 20 seconds after Ca2+ was delivered to cell 1, indicating permeation through Cx50 gap junction channels. The simultaneous measurement of gap junctional conductance showed that Cx50 was also gated by Ca2+, as was previously documented53, although on a much slower timescale than the solute permeation. A ~50% decline in the Cx50 junctional current was observed 60 seconds after 2 mM Ca2+ was delivered to cell 1, which increased to a 77% decline in coupling at 180 seconds. The mean gap junctional conductance (± SD) for all of the Cx50 cell pairs used in calcium permeability studies was 14 ± 5.1 nS.
We also found that Cx43 channels were highly permeable to Ca2+, although we used a more simplified assay (Fig. 4A,B, n = 5)). In these experiments, Cx43 expressing cells were loaded with Fluo-8 and a single cell in a multicellular cluster was patched in the whole cell mode with 2 mM Ca2+ added to the pipette solution while fluorescence was continuously monitored. Fluo-8 fluorescence rapidly increased in the patched cell, followed by a fluorescence increase in more distal cells in contact with the patched cell within one minute. Similar results were obtained with Cx50 expressing cells, when 2 mM Ca2+ was introduced into the cytoplasm of a single cell within a large cluster of cells (Fig. 4C,D, n = 3). For these Ca2+ permeability studies, 10 mM EGTA was omitted from the pipette solution. In contrast, delivery of 500 µM IP3 into the cytoplasm of a single cell within a large cluster of Cx50 expressing cells resulted in a rapid peak of fluorescent intensity in the injected cell, with no evidence of IP3 permeation to adjacent cells (Fig. 4E, n = 3). For these IP3 permeability studies, 10 mM EGTA was present in the pipette solution. These results confirmed that while both Cx43 and Cx50 channels showed a high permeability to Ca2+, only Cx43 displayed detectable permeability to the second messenger IP3.
Discussion
We have contrasted IP3 and Ca2+ permeability through gap junction channels formed from the lens connexins, Cx43 and Cx50. Cx50 showed greatly reduced IP3 permeability compared to Cx43, while both connexins were readily permeable to Ca2+. Differences in the permeation of these second messengers through Cx43 and Cx50 channels could influence the development of cataract in the lens. Calcium has long been known to play a significant role in cataract formation54,55 and altered Ca2+ signaling in lens epithelial cells has been implicated in cataract progression56. In addition, the lens possesses an array of G-protein coupled receptors that facilitate the release of intracellular calcium through the generation of IP357–59 and gap junction mediated Ca2+ signaling has been documented in primary cultures of lens epithelial cells60. Since the intercellular movement of IP3 appears to be more important for cell-to-cell propagation of Ca2+ signals43,61 (supplementary Fig. S1), the profoundly different permeability of Cx43 and Cx50 to IP3 could be relevant in cataract progression in the lens.
Differential permeability of IP3 through Cx43 and Cx50 channels could also impact lens cell proliferation and growth during development. Cx50 knockout decreased epithelial cell division during the first post-natal week, resulting in a significant reduction of lens growth7,34,62. In contrast, deletion of Cx43 did not reduce lens growth36,63, suggesting that a specific functional difference between Cx43 and Cx50 was required for normal postnatal epithelial mitosis and lens growth to occur. IP3 and Ca2+ act synergistically to influence cell division64–66, including in cultured human lens epithelial cells67. Elevated IP3 levels lead to Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum68, potentially linking second messenger generation following receptor activation to permeability properties of connexin channels. If restricted IP3 permeability through connexin channels were important for normal epithelial cell division during postnatal development, then one would predict that Cx43 could not compensate for loss of Cx50 in the lens epithelium, as it exhibits much greater permeability to IP3.
Recently, the structure of Cx50 has been resolved by cryo-electron microscopy at a resolution near the atomic level (~3.4 Å)69. Although there is no equivalent structure of Cx43 at this resolution, the availability of a Cx50 structure may allow approaches such as comparative all-atom MD simulations to probe isoform-specific differences in perm-selectivity to second messengers like IP3. Cx26 has been shown to be permeable to IP322,43, and there is also an atomic level structure for this connexin70, so this approach would not absolutely require an atomic level structure of Cx43. The documentation of profound differences in the permeation of connexin channels to biologically relevant second messengers is an important step in understanding the need for connexin diversity to maintain homeostasis in a variety of biological systems29,71. In combination with increasing information about connexin channel atomic structure, the molecular basis for these permeability differences may finally be elucidated in future studies.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines
HeLa cells that had been previously stably transfected with rat Cx43, or human Cx5017,72 were cultured and plated as described10. Briefly, cells were grown in DMEM (Gibco/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), supplemented with 10% FCS (Hyclone/ Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin (Gibco) and were passaged weekly, diluted 1:10, and kept at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator (5% CO2 / 95% ambient air). Permeability measurements were carried out on cell pairs plated on glass coverslips at low density.
Patch clamp electrophysiology
A combined whole-cell/perforated patch dual voltage-clamp method was used to measure gap junctional conductance between cell pairs17,73. Coverslips with cells expressing Cx43, or Cx50, were transferred to a recording chamber on an inverted microscope with a fluorescence imaging system. Cells were perfused with a solution containing (in mM) NaCl, 150; KCl, 10; CaCl2, 2; HEPES, 5 (pH 7.4); glucose, 5; CsCl, 2; and BaCl2, 2. Patch clamp electrodes were filled with a solution containing (in mM) K+ aspartate-, 120; NaCl, 10; MgATP, 3; HEPES, 5 (pH 7.2); EGTA, 10. For electrodes used in a perforated patch configuration, the solution was supplemented with 30–50 μM β-escin74. Patch clamp electrodes were pulled from glass capillaries (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) with a horizontal puller (DMZ-Universal, Zeitz-Instrumente, Martinsried, Germany). The measured resistance of the electrodes was 2–5 MΩ. Gap junctional conductance was measured throughout each experiment, beginning when both cells in the pair had been successfully patched.
IP3 permeability studies
We used IP3 mediated ER calcium release45,46 and Ca2+ sensitive fluorescent dyes as an assay for IP3 permeation through gap junction channels (Fig. 5). The detection of intercellular IP3 transfer was accomplished by culturing cell pairs where both cells expressed the connexin to be tested, and were pre-loaded with the calcium indicator dye Fluo-8 (5 μM, AAT Bioquest, Sunnyvale, CA) according the manufacturer’s protocol. IP3 transfer was monitored by continuously recording fluorescence in both cells using a digital CCD-camera (HRm Axiocam, Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY), while simultaneously measuring junctional conductance between cells 1 & 2 after the delivery of 250 or 500 µM IP3 to cell 1 through the patch pipette. An outline of each cell, and an equally sized area of background in an adjacent area without cells, were manually drawn in the images using AxioVision Software (Carl Zeiss, White Plains, NY). Fluorescent intensities for recipient and source cells were corrected by subtracting the background intensity, normalized to the peak fluorescent intensity in cell 1 and plotted versus time. To ensure that we monitored the passage of IP3, and not endogenous free Ca2+, which would also be liberated in the source cell, the pipette solution contained 10 mM EGTA to chelate the released Ca2+ in cell 1, and prevent its passage to cell 2 through gap junction channels. However, previous reports43,61,75,76 and additional control experiments (Supplementary Figure S1) suggested that the cell-to-cell transfer of endogenous Ca2+ was likely too minimal to confound our ability to detect IP3 transfer. Cell 2 was recorded in the perforated patch mode to prevent IP3 from diffusing into the recipient cell pipette. To prevent endogenous IP3 synthesis or degradation within the source cell, 3.5 mM diphosphoglyceric acid (a competitive inhibitor of IP3 phosphomonoesterases) and 20 µM IP3-kinase inhibitor (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA) were included in the pipette solution42,77.
Ca2+ permeability studies
Connexin expressing cell pairs loaded with Fluo-8 were also used to directly monitor Ca2+ permeability through gap junction channels. The detection of intercellular Ca2+ transfer was accomplished by culturing cell pairs where both cells expressed the connexin to be tested, and were pre-loaded with Fluo-8. Ca2+ transfer was monitored by continuously recording fluorescence in both cells, while simultaneously measuring junctional conductance between cells 1 & 2 after the delivery of 2 mM Ca2+ to cell 1. In some experiments, a single cell in a multicellular cluster of connexin cells was patched in the whole cell mode with 2 mM Ca2+ added to the pipette solution while Fluo-8 fluorescence was continuously monitored in the entire field of adjacent cells. For these studies, 10 mM EGTA was omitted from the pipette solution.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Supported by NIH Grants EY013163 & EY026911 to T.W.W., and GM088181 to V.V.
Author contributions
V.V. performed experiments, V.V. and T.W.W. designed experiments and contributed to data analysis, and T.W.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript prior to submission.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-65761-z.
References
- 1.Gerido DA, White TW. Connexin disorders of the ear, skin, and lens. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662:159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lovicu FJ. Cell signaling in lens development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006;17:675. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McAvoy JW, Chamberlain CG, de Iongh RU, Hales AM, Lovicu FJ. Lens development. Eye (Lond) 1999;13(Pt 3b):425–437. doi: 10.1038/eye.1999.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Robinson ML. An essential role for FGF receptor signaling in lens development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006;17:726–740. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boswell BA, Lein PJ, Musil LS. Cross-talk between fibroblast growth factor and bone morphogenetic proteins regulates gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in lens cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:2631–2641. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Le AC, Musil LS. A novel role for FGF and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the lens. J Cell Biol. 2001;154:197–216. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200101057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sellitto C, Li L, White TW. Connexin50 is essential for normal postnatal lens cell proliferation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3196–3202. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sellitto C, et al. The Phosphoinosotide 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit p110alpha is Required for Normal Lens Growth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:3145–3151. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berthoud VM, Ngezahayo A. Focus on lens connexins. BMC Cell Biol. 2017;18:6. doi: 10.1186/s12860-016-0116-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Valiunas V, Brink PR, White TW. Lens Connexin Channels Have Differential Permeability to the Second Messenger cAMP. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:3821–3829. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.White TW, Gao Y, Li L, Sellitto C, Srinivas M. Optimal lens epithelial cell proliferation is dependent on the connexin isoform providing gap junctional coupling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5630–5637. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dahm R, van Marle J, Prescott AR, Quinlan RA. Gap junctions containing alpha8-connexin (MP70) in the adult mammalian lens epithelium suggests a re-evaluation of its role in the lens. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69:45–56. doi: 10.1006/exer.1999.0670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goodenough DA. Gap junction dynamics and intercellular communication. Pharmacol Rev. 1978;30:383–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gilula NB, Reeves OR, Steinbach A. Metabolic coupling, ionic coupling and cell contacts. Nature. 1972;235:262–265. doi: 10.1038/235262a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goldberg GS, Valiunas V, Brink PR. Selective permeability of gap junction channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kanaporis G, Brink PR, Valiunas V. Gap junction permeability: selectivity for anionic and cationic probes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C600–609. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00316.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Valiunas V, Beyer EC, Brink PR. Cardiac gap junction channels show quantitative differences in selectivity. Circ Res. 2002;91:104–111. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000025638.24255.AA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Veenstra RD, et al. Selectivity of connexin-specific gap junctions does not correlate with channel conductance. Circ Res. 1995;77:1156–1165. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.77.6.1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kanaporis G, et al. Gap junction channels exhibit connexin-specific permeability to cyclic nucleotides. J Gen Physiol. 2008;131:293–305. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200709934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mese G, Valiunas V, Brink PR, White TW. Connexin26 deafness associated mutations show altered permeability to large cationic molecules. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295:C966–974. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00008.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ayad WA, Locke D, Koreen IV, Harris AL. Heteromeric, but not homomeric, connexin channels are selectively permeable to inositol phosphates. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:16727–16739. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600136200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beltramello M, Piazza V, Bukauskas FF, Pozzan T, Mammano F. Impaired permeability to Ins(1,4,5)P3 in a mutant connexin underlies recessive hereditary deafness. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:63–69. doi: 10.1038/ncb1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Y, et al. Gap junction-mediated intercellular biochemical coupling in cochlear supporting cells is required for normal cochlear functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15201–15206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501859102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bukauskas FF, Verselis VK. Gap junction channel gating. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1662:42–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harris AL. Connexin channel permeability to cytoplasmic molecules. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;94:120–143. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Harris AL. Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap. Q Rev Biophys. 2001;34:325–472. doi: 10.1017/S0033583501003705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Plum A, et al. Unique and shared functions of different connexins in mice. Curr Biol. 2000;10:1083–1091. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00690-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.White TW. Unique and redundant connexin contributions to lens development. Science. 2002;295:319–320. doi: 10.1126/science.1067582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.White TW. Nonredundant gap junction functions. News Physiol Sci. 2003;18:95–99. doi: 10.1152/nips.01430.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dicke N, et al. Peripheral lymphangiogenesis in mice depends on ectodermal connexin-26 (Gjb2) J Cell Sci. 2011;124:2806–2815. doi: 10.1242/jcs.084186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zheng-Fischhofer Q, et al. Connexin31 cannot functionally replace connexin43 during cardiac morphogenesis in mice. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:693–701. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alcolea S, et al. Replacement of connexin40 by connexin45 in the mouse: impact on cardiac electrical conduction. Circ Res. 2004;94:100–109. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000108261.67979.2A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang E, Geng A, Seo R, Maniar A, Gong X. Knock-in of Cx46 partially rescues fiber defects in lenses lacking Cx50. Mol Vis. 2017;23:160–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.White TW, Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Targeted ablation of connexin50 in mice results in microphthalmia and zonular pulverulent cataracts. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:815–825. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.3.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rong P, et al. Disruption of Gja8 (alpha8 connexin) in mice leads to microphthalmia associated with retardation of lens growth and lens fiber maturation. Development. 2002;129:167–174. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.1.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.White TW, Sellitto C, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Prenatal lens development in connexin43 and connexin50 double knockout mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2916–2923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martinez-Wittinghan FJ, et al. Dominant cataracts result from incongruous mixing of wild-type lens connexins. J Cell Biol. 2003;161:969–978. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200303068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yuan L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GJA8 knockout in rabbits recapitulates human congenital cataracts. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22024. doi: 10.1038/srep22024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jiang JX. Gap junctions or hemichannel-dependent and independent roles of connexins in cataractogenesis and lens development. Curr Mol Med. 2010;10:851–863. doi: 10.2174/156652410793937750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Berthoud VM, Minogue PJ, Osmolak P, Snabb JI, Beyer EC. Roles and regulation of lens epithelial cell connexins. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:1297–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mathias RT, White TW, Gong X. Lens gap junctions in growth, differentiation, and homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:179–206. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hernandez VH, et al. Unitary permeability of gap junction channels to second messengers measured by FRET microscopy. Nat Methods. 2007;4:353–358. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Niessen H, Harz H, Bedner P, Kramer K, Willecke K. Selective permeability of different connexin channels to the second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. J Cell Sci. 2000;113(Pt 8):1365–1372. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.8.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Saez JC, Connor JA, Spray DC, Bennett MV. Hepatocyte gap junctions are permeable to the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, and to calcium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2708–2712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gill DL, Ghosh TK, Mullaney JM. Calcium signalling mechanisms in endoplasmic reticulum activated by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and GTP. Cell Calcium. 1989;10:363–374. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(89)90062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Berridge MJ. Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:933–940. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.De Mello WC. Effect of intracellular injection of calcium and strontium on cell communication in heart. J Physiol. 1975;250:231–245. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Spray DC, Stern JH, Harris AL, Bennett MV. Gap junctional conductance: comparison of sensitivities to H and Ca ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:441–445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rose B, Loewenstein WR. Permeability of cell junction depends on local cytoplasmic calcium activity. Nature. 1975;254:250–252. doi: 10.1038/254250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Peracchia Camillo. Calmodulin-Mediated Regulation of Gap Junction Channels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(2):485. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Crow JM, Atkinson MM, Johnson RG. Micromolar levels of intracellular calcium reduce gap junctional permeability in lens cultures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3332–3341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lurtz MM, Louis CF. Intracellular calcium regulation of connexin43. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;293:C1806–1813. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00630.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen Y, et al. Molecular interaction and functional regulation of connexin50 gap junctions by calmodulin. Biochem J. 2011;435:711–722. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Duncan G, Jacob TJ. Calcium and the physiology of cataract. Ciba Found Symp. 1984;106:132–152. doi: 10.1002/9780470720875.ch8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Truscott RJ, Marcantonio JM, Tomlinson J, Duncan G. Calcium-induced opacification and proteolysis in the intact rat lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2405–2411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gosak M, et al. The Analysis of Intracellular and Intercellular Calcium Signaling in Human Anterior Lens Capsule Epithelial Cells with Regard to Different Types and Stages of the Cataract. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Duncan G, Wormstone IM. Calcium cell signalling and cataract: role of the endoplasmic reticulum. Eye (Lond) 1999;13(Pt 3b):480–483. doi: 10.1038/eye.1999.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rhodes JD, Sanderson J. The mechanisms of calcium homeostasis and signalling in the lens. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vivekanandan S, Lou MF. Evidence for the presence of phosphoinositide cycle and its involvement in cellular signal transduction in the rabbit lens. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8:101–111. doi: 10.3109/02713688909013899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Churchill GC, Atkinson MM, Louis CF. Mechanical stimulation initiates cell-to-cell calcium signaling in ovine lens epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 2):355–365. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sanderson MJ, Charles AC, Boitano S, Dirksen ER. Mechanisms and function of intercellular calcium signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1994;98:173–187. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(94)90136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sikic H, Shi Y, Lubura S, Bassnett S. A stochastic model of eye lens growth. J Theor Biol. 2015;376:15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.DeRosa AM, et al. The cataract causing Cx50-S50P mutant inhibits Cx43 and intercellular communication in the lens epithelium. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:1063–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Means AR. Calcium, calmodulin and cell cycle regulation. FEBS Lett. 1994;347:1–4. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00492-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lu KP, Means AR. Regulation of the cell cycle by calcium and calmodulin. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:40–58. doi: 10.1210/edrv-14-1-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Whitaker M, Patel R. Calcium and cell cycle control. Development. 1990;108:525–542. doi: 10.1242/dev.108.4.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang L, Wormstone IM, Reddan JR, Duncan G. Growth factor receptor signalling in human lens cells: role of the calcium store. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:885–895. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:11–21. doi: 10.1038/35036035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Myers JB, et al. Structure of native lens connexin 46/50 intercellular channels by cryo-EM. Nature. 2018;564:372–377. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0786-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Maeda S, et al. Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. Nature. 2009;458:597–602. doi: 10.1038/nature07869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem. 1996;238:1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Berthoud VM, et al. Loss of function and impaired degradation of a cataract-associated mutant connexin50. Eur J Cell Biol. 2003;82:209–221. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Valiunas V, Gemel J, Brink PR, Beyer EC. Gap junction channels formed by coexpressed connexin40 and connexin43. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;281:H1675–1689. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.4.H1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fan JS, Palade P. Perforated patch recording with beta-escin. Pflugers Arch. 1998;436:1021–1023. doi: 10.1007/PL00008086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Niessen H, Willecke K. Strongly decreased gap junctional permeability to inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate in connexin32 deficient hepatocytes. FEBS Lett. 2000;466:112–114. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01770-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yule DI, Stuenkel E, Williams JA. Intercellular calcium waves in rat pancreatic acini: mechanism of transmission. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:C1285–1294. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.4.C1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Downes CP, Mussat MC, Michell RH. The inositol trisphosphate phosphomonoesterase of the human erythrocyte membrane. Biochem J. 1982;203:169–177. doi: 10.1042/bj2030169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.